Could Anon Babble have passed the literacy test?

Those who failed were not allowed to vote

A lot of this questions are ambiguous. The test designer was retarded.

No they're not you dumb nigger

Filtered (or ESL). If you take your time and read each question a few times then it is always clear.

guess you're not voting

I take the CompTIA A+ next week bros wish me luck

This wouldn't be approved for standardized testing anywhere today stupid mutt

The only issues are saying to put a “line around a letter/number” because we don’t use that language anymore, and rather say to “circle” it, and #12 being awkwardly phrased

It isn’t designed for standardized testing but to test reasoning and ability to carefully consider

Is this actually legit? The way school taught us they made it seem like you needed 200Iq in order to pass

Whats the answer to 11?

Oh no, not the (((standardized testing)))!

Both terms are used, mostly to see if someone can figure out that “draw a line around” means the same as “circle”, a function of being able to parse by reasoning instead of just by route

This wouldn't be approved for standardized testing anywhere today

Today the world is run by illiterate retards. It is a good test because it is not ambiguous and requires that the test taker demonstrate competency with the English language.

You're pretty much guaranteed to fail this test if you are undisciplined, uneducated, or unable to follow instructions. Such people should not be allowed to vote unless their grandparents were.

saying to put a “line around a letter/number” because we don’t use that language anymore

Language isn't a series of cliches and idioms. It's a tool for conveying ideas. Anyone incapable of doing that should not be allowed to vote.

The only one I'm unsure on is if they're asking you to draw a crucifix (christian cross) or x (cross out) above the letter X

t. I'm white

g6ofcsL[1].png - 639x927, 455.85K

I only don’t understand #1. Am I retarded?

Do what you are told to do in each statement, nothing more, nothing less.

Above the letter X make a small cross

Don't overthink it, just do it in your head, validate it against the rules, and then do it if it works. No pressure. When the test taker looks it over, he'll check your skin tone and then begin grading.

#1 is a red herring. It tests your ability to discard superfluous information. "Or letter" being superfluous to this instruction.

4

Sorry, no voting for you.

crossing out in and not a

i kant reed

1?

What a garbage test. Zero practicality or applicable skill involved.

Lol
This

Language

Reasoning

Discipline

Instruction following

Spatial Cognition

And this test is only for people who can't prove they had a 5th grade education and whose grandparents couldn't vote. So yeah, it's fucking reasonable to have a standard for people earning their way into being first-time voters.

How about a real English test. It's garbage.

The only problem with this test is that it doesn't ask any questions about civics. They need to ask "who pays for itwelfare benefits?" and if they answer "the government" instead of "the taxpayers" they fail

id draw a horse shoe shape, its a line but not a completed circle

They didn't have welfare benefits then

Isn't the 'correct' answer to #11 xxxx'ing (or line through) the last four 0's?

Definite article, singular, "the number" not "the numbers". While a number can have more than one digit, a bunch of zeros is not a number, therefore number in this context refers to digit

4

a

11

1

It's not an English test. It's a great test for people earning their right to vote who don't have proof of education or a prior family history of voting.

unfortunately this type of thinking isn't taught any more. it's all about superfluous information. phrases that mean nothing replacing actual knowledge and expertise.

Cuck

Thats what I thought too, because crossing out any zero leaves a number still greater than 1 million. I was over thinking it, also might be the 8 beer deep I am right now

simple as

1.jpg - 640x928, 169.53K

dumbass nigger lmao

Is (x) a cross?
Is (+) a cross?
Is (---) crossing it out?
That is the only ambiguity

fuck Im also retarded
ok im going to commit and go do more drugs

Holy shit bro you failed even the unambiguous ones

3

9 (wtf)

bro it says three circles, one inside the other...that means three circles inside each other

novote.png - 292x293, 38.32K

It's an impossibility though.
Think about it

it says 'one' not 'each' ya daft cunt

also 11 is wrong...dumbass. read your questions CAREFULLY.

ESL. + is always called cross and x is always called ex. x marks the spot

Also says 'three' not 'four'

It says "line," not "line segment," faggots.

Anon Babble once again proves it's racial superiority.

The only ambiguous question here is #11. I chose to cross out the numbers untill the remaining number is 1,000,000.

There is more to this test, i will post the next one soon. If the questions keep being very ambiguous i can see how people could get it wrong.

4386.png - 763x1113, 687.01K

1

Wrong

Fail. An 'X' is not a "cross out"

#6 is wrong nigger, no vote 4 u

dumbass.png - 293x294, 39.36K

1 is correct. It gives you the option of circling the "1." or "letter"

Yes, just show white hand.

Easy.

aadsaddggg.jpg - 640x928, 178.92K

you don't know what a line segment is

Circling the 1 is actually wrong because the number 1 is not part of the sentence but part of the line

i don't know if this proves Anon Babble is retarded or that these tests were made explicitly to deny voting. Keep in mind you only would take one if you couldn't prove a 5th grade education

anyways here is part II

1.

"1." isn't even part of the sentence. "or letter" would hint at the word "a"

4.

lol

6.

"one inside the other" is technically ambiguous, but the non-autistic interpretation would be EACH inside another, not literally ONLY ONE in another followed by a circle on it's own lol. in fact, this question is probably an autist filter

7.

cross as in literal cross, not what you would write to cross something out

11.

what are you even doing? the only way to change this to under a million (under condition of only crossing out one number) is to crossout 1

9/13, not white

I count 7 circles here

I kneel.

There are no lines. So this test is flawed.

It being worded as "one inside THE other" means that it is almost certainly intended to be all three circles nested inside one another as in , as there is more than one other circle. That said, it's the most poorly worded one by a significant margin. If I was assessing them I'd grant credit for either interpretation.

or letter OF the sentence

Not A letter

The sentence number 1

Or the sentence A

Anyway you circled the word

First year stanford university exam these days.

nvm i read >11 wrong, still, 10/13

(was going to say final year but don't want to exaggerate).

So what's the answer to 11?
Do you cross out the 1 because the number needs to be below 1 million or do you cross out all but the last 4 zeroes so you got 1 million crossed out or do you cross out the last 4 zeroes to leave 1 million?

9 is perfect.
it says line not lines

Circling the number is wrong, retard

I'll be surprised if more than a third of Americans can pass this.

draw a line around the shortest word in this sentence.

not possible by definition

first question is stupid. the other ones are pretty clear

you gotta understand people in louisiana don't speak intelligible english on a good day, unironically...the fact a coonass could put thought to print in the early 20th century is beyond belief. any ambiguity is excused for such reasons imo. if when you read the questions you imagine them being read by a big dumb fuk coonass then it all becomes much clearer.

it's actually pretty ambiguous

most people shouldn't be allowed to vote
shocking nobody

I don't understand what #1 is asking me to circle. The numeral 1? The letter 'a'? the words "number" or "letter"? Am I missing some archaic idiom?

the rest are straightforward.

Lines are straight by definition

do you play Noughts and ex's or Noughts and crosses?

Your literati are worse than your scum

Looks like someone won't get to choose between usha vance and kamala harris/gavin newsome (gretchen didn't get chosen because she's not indian and in 3 years the country will be 15% more indian).

Depends on interpretation. Can we have SCOTUS look at it?

Read more.

You'll be fine.

I'd say it's on purpose. To filter those who can't tell they mean to circle. I knew what it meant.

Not even if their grandparents were. Test should be taken every damn decade.

They're called exes and ohs here. Nought as a term is not used in America, zero is called zero or oh. 305 is pronounced three oh five

You fucked 4 and 6.
I got them all and I'm Cuban.

so why does it not say draw an O around the number in question 1?
checkmate

A is used in the context of a word so it isn’t “the letter” of the sentence it is A LETTER but not THE letter. Key word “THE”, the letter of the sentence is the word letter. Letter doesn’t necessarily mean a character in the alphabet, it can be a letter as in mailing a message also. You can also circle the word number to pass also, because “number” is “THE” number of the sentence also.

The only question I got wrong was last question I should have x marked instead of single line

There is no number in the sentence, the number is it’s own sentence separate from the question “THIS SENTENCE”.

Because it's a literacy test

all of them are badly worded but 6 and 11 are especially bad

yes, they also shouldn't be allowed to vote just because they can read since they're too cowardly and weak for personal responsibility
somewhere between 20%-35% of the population should be the voting body

file.png - 750x580, 796.24K

Since all lines are straight by definition, how do you draw a line around something? Wouldn't that require bending spacetime?

Noughts and Crosses is only played in Scotland

1. sentence
2. sentence
3. sentence
What is the number of the sentence
1. question
2. question
Question number 2; sentence number 2

'a' isn't a word, it's a letter

This is like me saying you are obtuse and you trying to demonstrate I am geometrically wrong. The definitions here are everyday usage, not Euclidean geometry (which would be unfamiliar to someone who never finished 5th grade)

Gib part III

He'd fumble it

It's both. The indefinite article "a" is a word with only one letter, like "I". It's the same word as "an" but preceding a word beginning with a vowel

Since all lines are straight by definition,

Wrong

Gay lines weren't legalized until after this test was written

Good luck bro
You should study

Cross out 3 zeros, 1,000,000 xxx

It is

10,000,000,000 is a number, zero is also a number

You cross out the 1 making the full number 0, ie. below one million.

It doesn't say cross out the number or numbers, it says cross out the number.

Good luck in your journey towards a basic level of fluency in english.

a bunch of zeros is not a number,

yes it is a number, idiot.

03 is a number, it's equivalent to 3, but 03 is a valid way of representing it. Try to enroll at your nearest kindergarten.

is 0000000000 a number

holy shit

No, it's not legit. Notice the lack of a control number, or the name of a department, or instructions to submit it to someone for grading.

It's also written in a font that came out in the 80's.

Number 6 needs all of the circles to be in the same place.

If someone told you to stack bricks one on top of the other would you stack one brick on the other brick and leave the rest of them around the place? No, it means to keep putting one on top of the other, it's an idiomatic expression as in don't take it completely literally.

Not legit.

Fake bullshit with ambiguous use of the word "the". Draw a circle around the word. Which word? The word "the" is a definite article in grammar studies. It presumes a reference to something definite. This "test" is some crybaby shit to make niggers feel oppressed and to nurse their grievance against White people.

The font didn't even exist back in the 60's. Just look at it, and there is no old-time feel at all.

I don't know how to draw a line "around", so I just drew a line near it.

it's not a line if it goes around

LOL niggers
Good one, OP.
Hats off.