Indigenous peoples of the Indian subcontinent

You are a gay homosexual.

One of the most beautiful national parks is there in the Northeast of India, just above Bangladesh: youtube.com/watch?v=YCXOtcharM0

Have you ever met one?

Random question; what is Bangladesh’s stance on the current Pakistan India conflict? How will it affect Bangladesh and what do you think will ultimately happen?
What are people saying over there?

Large, dark, pepperoni nipples.

These are the true indigenous population for south asia

humanphenotypes.net/basic/Veddid.html

Dravidians? That makes sense
So where does pic rel in OP fall into this historically?

Obviously they look like the koisan and inuits

Always. They're pretty common at where I live even in the capital Dhaka (one of the shittiest cities on earth).

Despite what you know about "jeets" in South Asia, Bangladesh is actually of around 30% Sino-Tibetan admixture, especially in the eastern parts of the country.

In Bangladesh, the military officers tended to marry their women a lot (the hilly areas are still heavily militarized, even after the peace accord in 1997)

However, still today sexual exploitation and rapes of their women go unreported in the media.

They're mostly Buddhists and Christians. In fact, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Afghanistan themselves were mainly Buddhists. When (gentler Sufi) Muslims came, Buddhists went for peaceful relations and then slowly got extinct. Some evictions, forceful conversions, and likely massacres by Turkic Muslim horde were also responsible, in part.

youtube.com/watch?v=Y5f4ugcZG-M

Bangladesh just went through its own version of anti-India movement and kicked out the Indian stooge prime minister.

Anti-India sentiment here is at its peak. Islamists are increasing in numbers. Obviously, many people are supporting Pakistan.

Indian loudmouth antics have even frayed the pro-Indian faction. The supporters of ousted autocrat are supportive of India, as Delhi gave her and many of her party members refuge.

Officially, Bangladesh will not support Pakistan (still no formal apology for 1971 genocide), and is not supporting India either. Neutrality, not by choice, but by necessity.

However, Bangladesh is well aware that India might one day attack the country to broaden either the "Chicken's neck" corridor connecting both sides of India OR get a sea-route for the Northeast India.

Americans and Chinese both are supportive of Bangladesh for their own reasons. Both always eyed for some naval or even airbases, which Bangladeshi govt. didn't and still doesn't agree to.

Despite what you see in the open, US and Indian interests compete heavily in the Indian ocean region, especially in the bay of Bengal area.

Not Dravidians. The earliest inhabitants of the Indian subcontinent were ancient hunter-gatherers who were genetically related to the Andamanese people.

Iranian farmer populations then migrated and mixed with those hunter gatherers to form Dravidian speaking populations

Pic rel in OP came next from Sino-Tibetan regions in multiple waves with the earliest being around 4000-3000 BCE.

Aryans are the last ones to migrate to the subcontinent from Central Asia around 1500-1200 BCE.

When do you think an attack from India could happen? It just doesn’t seem likely since that would open up a 2-front war for them

In case you don't know, only 22 kilometers separate Nepal and Bangladesh (and China is nearby) and that corridor is all India has to connect its Northeast.

India always wanted to expand the corridor or to secure it more.

18 of the 26 Rafales of India are stationed near Delhi (one down last night) and 18 are stationed above Bangladesh, right beside the "Chicken's neck" corridor.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siliguri_Corridor

Hm, thanks for the share
I’m intrigued by south asias history and current politics
What else should I know about your country? Where do you see it in 20 years? 50?

No, India can't handle two fronts, especially as the USA has a big interest in Bangladesh and bay of Bengal.

And China is not going to silently lose further access to Bay of Bengal.

However, Indian airforce can flatten Bangladesh as we don't even have many aircraft (only several old rickety Mig 29s) or air defense systems.

indigenous

when do migrants become indigenous?
afaik pajeets have been pajeets for 3k+ years, much longer than krauts have lived in Germania

Pakistan zindabad Pakistan zindabad
Pakistan zindabad Pakistan zindabad
Pakistan zindabad Pakistan zindabad
Pakistan zindabad Pakistan zindabad
youtube.com/shorts/uH6WUIfP8MU?si=7kewQMqcfvcZoXgC

youtu.be/qZbQdhgGo7Q?si=nja-B9s5cXJb-MLH [Open]

youtu.be/7KObDdBASBY?si=jhrwwnrp3Zj_KAHZ [Open]
Pakistan zindabad Pakistan zindabad
Pakistan zindabad Pakistan zindabad
Pakistan zindabad Pakistan zindabad
Pakistan zindabad Pakistan zindabad

That would suck
Hope that doesn’t happen

They are East Asian. They are from the Northeast part of India that juts out of the subcontinent into Asia proper next to China and Myanmar. Many of them are Christians.

They had some protests a while calling on Xi Jinping to liberate them from the Poo menace.

“It means the people of Mizoram are not taken into consideration by the Union government. If that’s the case, we are not also not interested in being India citizens. We better be with China, where the people also belong to Mongoloid tribes like us.”

I am from a place just north of this corridor pointed out by this kanglu from a small state called Sikkim and let me say it is literal paradise on earth also the girls look super cute and are very lovely . The best thing about Sikkim is we generally are a very respectful people and a high trust society .

We are real patriotic and most of the men in my family were in the army also my family are staunch Dharmic people and I practice both Hinduism and Buddhism .

We strongly hate Bangladeshis and want them out from entire Sikkim and Assam .

That sucks. I don’t think it’s healthy to hate

Well you would hate them too if they come to your land , steal shit tease women and just make a mess of things .

Are Bangladeshis aware of this beef?

Shitty, as usual.

In the 2000s, Vietnam was poorer. Now Vietnam has almost double the GDP per capita.

Bangladesh has too many people with low IQs and Islamism is on the rise.

Now, I'm not blaming Islam in its entirety, as "moderately Islamic" Bengal was one of the richest regions of the world (around 13% of the world's GDP) 350 odd years ago (before the industrial revolution).

But this brand of Islam (a mix of Talibanism* and middle eastern harsh Islamism)

* Taliban subscribe to the Deobandi school of Islam, which originated near Delhi.

The pajeets are the migrants. These people are the indigenous people. They were there first. (We are specifically talking about Northeast India here where these people are from)

Whoever migrates first ig. See thisMost of the people are illiterate retards unaware of any history right now but I wonder if in the future one day they will use this information as a tool for political leverage kek.

I thought that the Jamaat Islamic political party didn’t have much weight over there
The Yunus government is Islamist?

Believe it or not, Pakistani economy is smaller than Bangladeshi economy (both in total GDP size and Pakistan has around half the GDP per capita of Bangladesh), despite Pakistani population being much higher than Bangladesh.

Yet Pakistanis field one of the best air forces in Asia. Pakistan is that militarized.

How stable is it these days? Does it have a chance to stabilize and attract investments?

Why do many Indians come across so angry at everyone else?

Hey, how many Bangladeshis are there in Sikkim? It is partly closed even for Indians! You can't freely relocate there as a non-Sikkimese, as far as I know.

Sikkim was forcefully absorbed into India in 1975, no? Many Sikkimese are staunchly pro-India now, but some do like their state to be autonomous. Even your local political parties are different. However, they do tend to form coalitions with Indian mainstream parties.

I’m not Indian

Don't care we don't like them .

Also they are black

Ahh yes the Bangladeshi knows more about my state then me .

We have a sizeable population of you blacks living in north Bengal

Hope things get better between you guys

It is an Indian propaganda that Yunus is an Islamist. That guy is NGO by blood.

It's just that after the fall of the autocrat, Islamists got new freedom and Yunus couldn't control it, as the police vanished and the policing system still isn't working fully.

Jamatis are just infants compared to what we are facing. Again, Indian propaganda.

I've always been repulsed by Jamat, but the real issue is the actual jihadis, which are radical Islamists subscribing to Taliban ideology. Some go as far as being Laden and some Baghdadi fanboys.

Few talk about them, because, again, Indian propaganda and foreign journalists know little.

Sorry, your (You) got mixed up. I was addressing that Kraut flagged Sikkimese Indian.

Hey, you just stated you state was Sikkim. Now you're talking about North Bengal, who are literally Bengalis (Nepalis in Kalimpong-Darjeeling).

Surely there is illegal immigration from Bangladesh to the West Bengal state of India, of which North Bengal is a part. But it isn't Sikkim.

Bangladesh is destined to be shitty. Yes, it will be stabilized, yes it will attract some investments. But it's not supercharged development, just limping on.

See how Vietnam has surpassed us, despite starting lower and slower than us.

Ignorance is a bliss in this land. Braggart behavior is in South Asian collective psychology.

I saw people commenting in a video that north east indians should try to be cast in bollywood and im 100% sure is related to Kpop and Kdrama popularity lol

The original people of Europe were darker than the Arayns/indo-eruopeans/steppe people who conquered them. You can tell because in the north it is like 50% sintastha and the rest is anatolian or other indigenous european hunter-gatherers. In the south it is like 1/3 sintastha, and they are slightly darker than northern Europeans, but they are still white nonetheless.

This connects to India because they only have ancestry from different population groups, varying from white, brown, and black, and when you mix those three together, you get different variations of brown.

Complete cultural replacement probably happened in Europe because the orginal people who made stoneage are LOOOONG gone. We have no idea what their culture was like or even their names. They got culled out, but in India, this never happened because the population was just so large, and because it was a jungle environment, it was pretty much impossible to go into a forest and not get some type of disease. Hence, caste system was created.