BASED! BASED! BASED! BASED!
DEPORT EVERY ILLEGAL!!
MASS DEPORTATIONS NOW!!!!
SUPREME COURT RULINGS ARE RETROACTIVE!
CHILDREN OF ILLEGALS AND TEMPORARY VISA STATUS HOLDERS LOSE THEIR BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP ON MAY 15TH!
HAPPENING!!!!! CHILDREN OF ILLEGALS AND TEMP. VISA HOLDERS TO LOSE CITIZENSHIP LIVE ON TELEVISION!!!
based, itll get all the spics reagan made citizens out too
Post your sat score and what you do to earn money so you can properly be identified by the internet naturalization services
youre all going back
nothing is happening, please take your meds OP
My great grandfather was a 2nd generation immigrant that had a house servant
Sorry about your inferior ancestry and the mercury content of the water in west virginia
On May 15th 2025 the Trump Administration plans on presenting their argument in front of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning his executive order to end Birthright Citizenship for the children of Illegal Aliens (Found here: whitehouse.gov
If SCOTUS rules in the Trump Administration's favor that would be RETROACTIVE (See here: constitution.congress.gov
On May 1st, 183 Democrats after spending 4+ months working on it have finally presented their Counter-Argument to SCOTUS and it is not looking good for the shitskins and their goblin offspring! In the counter-argument (Found here: litigationandresponse.house.gov
This is the single most important event in American history since its founding; the question of who IS and IS NOT a citizen will be put in stone by SCOTUS in June or July after hearing the arguments presented on May 15th.
PREVIOUS THREADS (STILL UNDEFEATED):
The Law as it stands already supports my and the Trump Administrations argument that Temporary Visa Holders and ILLEGAL Migrants and their offspring are NOT U.S Citizens. The intent and meaning of the 14th amendment is clear as can be seen in pic related which can be found at: congress.gov
The United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) builds upon that and offers FURTHER PRECEDENT to support my arguments that ILLEGAL MIGRANTS, TEMPORARY VISA HOLDERS (such as H1B) AND THEIR OFFSPRING ARE NOT U.S CITIZENS as the majority opinion explicitly uses the words "permanent resident" and "permanent domicile" which the modern day equivalent is the Permanent Residency Card or "Green Card".
The opposition has NO ARGUMENTS. They WILL NOT respond to my thread because they are LOW IQ, have NO ARGUMENTS, and couldn't come up with an argument even if they tried.
Wong Kim Ark addressed a very narrow legal question: whether a child born in the United States to lawful permanent residents of Chinese descent was entitled to citizenship under the 14th Amendment. The case did not, despite the conventional wisdom over decades, reach the question of whether children born to parents illegally in the United States were entitled to citizenship under the amendment.
In other words, it did not answer whether those not subject to the political jurisdiction thereof were entitled to birthright citizenship. The court ruled in favor of Wong Kim Ark, concluding that the children of lawful permanent residents who are “domiciled” in the United States are entitled to birthright citizenship.
Wong Kim Ark did not address the question of whether children born to individuals who are unlawfully present in the United States qualify for birthright citizenship, no matter how many jews say otherwise.
The 1898 case is available for all to read here: law.cornell.edu
The opposition knows that the facts and the constitution support my arguments this is why they DO NOT wish for the Trump Administration to present these arguments in front of SCOTUS because they KNOW they WILL LOSE.
The following is a quote from Charles J. Cooper from Cooper & Kirk Law Firm which testified UNDER OATH in front of the House Judiciary Committee on February 25th, 2025.
COOPER: Why did its framers choose such a strange way to say that (and subject to the jurisdiction thereof)? Why didn't they just say subject to the laws of the United States? Doing so would've been quite natural given that this straightforward, unambiguous phrase is used in both Article III and Article VI.
The clause also ensures that birthright citizenship makes newborns citizens of both the United States. And of the states wherein they reside, that is where they live, their home. This word standing alone implies a lawful permanent residence, and it plainly excludes tourists and other lawful visitors, as well as illegal aliens who are prohibited by law from residing in a state.
Although they all must obey our laws.
The full Transcript can be found here: congress.gov
The original colonists were escaping prosecution for sex crimes
In The United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) it is stated in the majority SCOTUS ruling that (emphasis mine):
The fourteenth amendment affirms the ancient and fundamental rule of citizenship by birth within the territory, IN THE ALLEGIANCE AND UNDER THE PROTECTION OF THE COUNTRY, including all children here born of RESIDENT ALIENS, with the exceptions or qualifications (as old as the rule itself) of children of foreign sovereigns and their ministers, or born on foreign public ships, or of enemies within and during hostile occupation of part of our territory, and with the single additional exception of children of members of the Indian tribes OWING DIRECT ALLEGIANCE TO THEIR SEVERAL TRIBES.
For a person born within the territory of the United States to be "subject to the jurisdiction thereof", it appears from the above passage that the person MUST at birth owe a sufficiently direct duty of allegiance to the sovereign in return for the sovereigns reciprocal obligation to protection. The child of members of an Indian tribe who owe direct allegiance to their tribe does NOT qualify, although clearly born within the territory of the United States.
NOR DO THE CHILDREN OF ALIENS WHO ARE HERE ILLEGALLY.
Grovel to israel muttling.
Im 23 and work as a truck driver and contribute to society. So im going to get my citizenship stripped and then get shipped to south america because my parents are slap dicks? Makes zero sense. I was born here and am a model citizen. If this actually happens the President is an idiot. I'll just move to Russia and contribute to a country that actually wants me. This is absolutely ridiculous and the fact that you celebrate it suggests you have something severely wrong with you.
spics support a jewish president and voted for more dei and jewish dick sucking under kamala, youre going back pablo
go be a truck driver in mexico, mutt.
I support UPHOLDING the U.S Constitution. I am sorry that you HATE America and the U.S Constitution but that's not my problem. I personally LOVE America. You can also come back LEGALLY so long as they don't forcefully deport you in which case you might be banned for upwards of 20 years from reentry.
I'm here legally, I was born in New Jersey retard. I have a passport, I celebrate the fourth of july and christmas just like any other "real" american. Glad to know you see me as a second class citizen for factors I cannot control. Definitely regret voting for Trump in these past 2 elections now. Didnt realize so many people think like this, very disgusting.
Fruit from poisonous tree is poisonous Simple as
just because a rat was born in a stable doesnt make it a horse
I doubt anyone's actually losing citizenship over this even if something does happen. Laws are not retroactive.
that feel when you become stateless because there is no father on your birth certificate
defeated by the eternal roastie yet again, i hope canada will take me. i was born here and so was my mom lol
laws are not retroactive
SCOTUS does not "make laws"
Of course, he may try to force it. But I don't think he'll be able to do so. Considering he is comporting himself with all the subtlety and ability of a short lived Latin American despot.
Laws are not retroactive.
This law is very old. Interpreting it correctly corrects illegal actions it's misinterpretation created. Trump is a cuck tho so will likely just give everyone affected by it amnesty.
A hadji that has eaten big mac's and whoppers all their lives is more American than this antiquated notion of citezenship that you have. To think that the country as a whole is still supporting Israel after the U.S.S. Liberty is further proof that your misguided fervor is simply that. Misguided.
How many red bleeding sons of citizens saved many incompetent officers during the gwot?
Those spics and hadji's showed more patriotism than this blatantly racist and outdated notion of citizenship. If things were to stand as you say they should, it should apply retroactively to all families and we should deport your disgusting yugolavic, baltic whatever kike bullshit you are larping as because you are simply not Mayflower material.
Fucking peasant. Life was better when we sold you with the niggers on wholesale
he thinks Barrett or Kavanaugh would side with opposing judges
I swear, you MIGA tards struggle to learn lessons.
We should burn the constitution because... because... RAAYCISM!!!!!!!
pottery
hose spics and hadji's showed more patriotism than this blatantly racist and outdated notion of citizenship
go be patriotic in your own country spic
Reminder that the current state of the oppositions argument or lack thereof is as shown in pic related
immigrant
back
video says supreme court says things
youtube.com
Same retard different bus
Don't jump to conclusion nigger. If you loved the contitution so much, why is a foreign agent sitting in congress with an IDF uniform?
God will punish you and everytime you eat, you will do it knowing that you are eating because of the labor of others and not because your 'people' did anything. You are a consumer and are outdated, you are to be replaced.
Fucking faggot, show us all how much Israeli cum you've guzzled.
You will eat your words, after your daily Shapiro cock
This is your brain on Goyslopp.
I don't follow this shit, but it seems that Spic Fuentes is a better white man than you, probably more patriotic than you.
Worse than a Jew you are
OP has gone delulu chat...
OP is Israeli
spic Fuentes is a better white man than you,
hes not white.
It's only this stubborn retard making a daily thread, who doesn't even know the definition of "retroactive".
Trump has never said he intends the ruling to be retroactive.
It might be impossible to make it retroactive. How far back can you even go?
I'll just move to Russia
Make sure you cross their border illegally like your spic parents. See what happens to you
You are beyond the salvation of christ if you do not undestand what I meant.
In simple Jack terms, you are less than white. You are lower on the caste than he is, and you should apologize for displaying your stupidity in front of all of us.
Apologize to Anon Babble cocksucker, or get the fuck out, kike
It doesn't matter what "Trump said" for POTUS CANNOT supersede the US Constitution and SCOTUS majority opinion rulings on Constitutional Question and ORIGIONALIST MEANING are RETROACTIVE DEFAULT because to claim otherwise would be to claim that SCOTUS has the POWER to amend or change the U.S Constitution which they DO NOT therefor an Constitutional Ruling SCOTUS is seen as interpreting what the Constitution ALWAYS WAS therefore it is by default retroactive in nature.
literally who?
plus, this sounds a lot like what spic fuentes is doing, funny how that is. nick has admitted multiple times he isnt white and you will also never be white pablo
you will always be a mexilard
Your constitutional crap is toilet paper.
Either the U.S.S. Liberty gets avenged or your constitution is toilet paper for making Israel great again.
Thank you for your donation, Goy
My father was the child of two Scottish immigrants who arrived to the US in the mid 1930's. Is my boomer dad going to be deported? He died a few years ago after being talked into maxxvaxxing by CNN. But I'm just wondering if they'll take his state employee pension payments that now go to me.
Oh wait, nevermind, my grandparents were legal immigrants.
We really need to fix the education system, you are beyond retarded
The constitution is toilet paper
Yes, I know that (You) hate America.
your iq is roughly 87 on average spic
Fuck of /ptg/ migger.
The opposition has completely conceded at this point. They utterly refuse to present a cogent argument and instead rely on school yard tactics and logical fallacy with intent to antagonize.
lmao trump isn't even gonna deport the illegal spics either. mass deportation is not happening and anyone with a 3 digit IQ understands that now.
Are they intentionally doing this? As in, they see this ruling as a way to cause chaos, later use it to their advantage?
theyve already left on their own pablo
OP is a retard.
Shows no proof about SC rulings being retroactive.
The page he links to, specifically says that it should be weighed the harm that applying retroactively causes, as opposed to only applying prospectively,
This idiot claims that ALL SC RULINGS are retroactive (false), and can't even name 1 example of a case where government issued a tangible thing, then automatically and retroactively took it away
I believe he's a high school kid, who read a book about the Constitution and now believes he knows everything about it.
I hope this happens so bad.
You must be a mod to be this dense and stupid on purpose. I hope you get a hemmeroid and die, this was a waste of time, but showed everyone what a fucking retard you are.
You have not addressed the foreign enemies in congress. You are fake news. I wish you death
lol youre brown
Present an argument
Hint: (You) will not
They're not changing any law, asswipe.
This has been explained to you multiple times, by multiple people, you fucking donkey.
The law was interpreted so that birthright citizenship was granted to all babies born in American soil.
A ruling against it next month or whenever, means NOTHING to the people born BEFORE the potential ruling.
But you keep saying some nonsense shit about changing the Constitution.
It's like the EO from Trump to stop giving babies of H1b people, birthright citizenship. Did it apply to babies born before the date? NO.
For it to apply, you'd need to bring a case against the people who did get the birthright citizenship.
In your idiotic drooling fantasies, you believe the stroke of a pen, will "automatically and retroactively" invalidate the citizenship of 10s of millions and turn them into stateless residents.
The law was interpreted so that birthright citizenship was granted to all babies born in American soil.
Name the SCOTUS case please, and by "law" I assume you mean the 14th amendment.
Hint: You will not
by default retroactive in nature
You post no proof or example, other than your retarded ass kindergarten tier reasoning.
2 weeeks !!!
Unless you're OP.
This is the stupidest motherfucker I've met here. He must be a zoomer. Him and the other dumbass. Report these niggers with their low quality retardation. Their supposed hubris will be their downfall
I have provided DOZENS of SCOTUS rulings that were automatically applied retroactively not to mention a simple internet search will tell you that SCOTUS rulings on Constitutional Questions are retroactive which is why when someone is serving a prison sentence and the law they were convicted under is deemed unconstitutional they are released from prison.
Dreamers, but their dream was a nightmare.
Hint: You will not
Reported!
toplel
That's the point you drooling excuse of a human.
NO CASE was presented to SCOTUS, to argue that issuing birthright citizenship to all babies born in American soil, was unConstitutional.
Until you present your case, and the SC rules in your favor, can it be applied.
It can't be applied before the ruling, because no case was brought up to specifically forbid such children from getting birthright citizenship.
Are you getting paid by reply?
why do you keep repeating the same shit over and over and over, pretending you don't get it.
Incorrect
List of SOME of the SCOTUS rulings that were applied RETROACTIVELY:
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
Crawford v. Washington (2004)
Padilla v. Kentucky (2010)
Atkins v. Virginia (2002)
Roper v. Simmons (2005)
Miller v. Alabama (2012)
U.S v. Booker (2005)
Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
Loving v. Virginia (1967)
Arizona v. Gant (2009)
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
Batson v. Kentucky (1986)
Ring v. Arizona (2002)
And none of them showed a ruling applied retroactive.
Desegregation of schools. Have you figured out yet, how they traveled back in time to desegregate schools BEFORE the ruling?
Or with mixed marriages? They went back in time to marry the couples that got denied a marriage license?
Step 1. Get a dictionary, and look up the word retroactive.
Wong Kim Ark already set the precedent that only the children of Lawful Permanent Residents, and US Citizens are recognized under the 14th Amendment.
Does the mexican flag that for something to be "retroactive" that you first require a time machine? Is this like the niggers with the "have you had breakfast this morning" question?
Youre not a citizen though, and even if you were you're still not American. That said you are not the one that broke the law, the government did when it gave you a Ssn. The court will cuck and further ruin this country forever, but even if it doesn't it wont be retroactive
Retroactive to 1801, all you anchor baby welfare kweens are going back.
OH NO NO NO NO!! THE POOJEETS HAVE LEARNED THEIR H1B BIRTH TOURISM SCAM IS OVER!
Yes. In accordance of SC weighing the harm of applying a law retro or only prospectively.
Now rub your two neurons together, and think hard.
Does voiding tens of millions of people's citizenship and making them stateless, counts as "harm"?
Can you say all SC rulings are retroactive, when the "proof" you keep posting speaks about not causing harm through applying a ruling retroactively? NO
Did the students who get into college through aa, got their degrees revoked after SC ruled aa unconstitutional? NO.
I can keep going. And you'll keep saying "but you can't change the constitutionnnnnnnnnn OMG!!!!"
Explain how interracial marriage was retroactive.
I concede that SCOTUS rulings apply retroactively
I accept your concession
Yes. He's a dense one.
Pick one.
Explain the ruling.
And explain how it was applied retroactively.
better yet in nicaragua or costa rica, those fuckers have immense balls of steel
president cant override the constitution. while i dont care for birthright citizenship it has to be repealed the proper way.
We have been through this song and dance dozens of times now. I think you just do not fundamentally understand the definition of "retroactive" and you believe that to carry out a retroactive ruling on a constitutional question would require an actual physical time machine to go back in time or something, I am still not quite sure WHAT your argument is.
That's the POINT POTUS is upholding the constitution.
If (You) want illegals to have birthright citizenship it is (You) who must utilize Article V to change the US Constitution.
United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) says otherwise...
wongs parents werent americans they were chinese nationals. im not aware of this court case being overruled.
Incorrect, see here , here , here and finally here Wong Kim Ark specifically states that Permanent LAWFUL Residents fall under the 14th amendment.
Birthright citizenship was never intended to be used by expecting pregnant mothers to drop anchor babies and bring the whole family over for gibs abuse.
-revoke birthright citizenship
-fine the abusers
-do not jail them, just deport them and seize all their assets in the US
Also, why the fuck is the Greyhound bus company allowed to operate as a human trafficking service all over the US? All these bus companies do is transport illegals and homeless all over the nation. Dismantle their companies and seize their assets, fine and imprison the CEOs of these transport companies for their participation in this whole mess.
greyhounds are just for poor people and people who dont have cars . illegals using it is just a side affect as most are poor.
you can bet the chinese are flown in are we going to seize every airline now
kek
it's over (for dems/spics/trannies)
you're just realizing this now? shit I knew when I was edgy in high school. good luck learning Russian retard. you're so low IQ you don't realize how everywhere else in the world is a shithole ruined by Indians. but you're going to speak a language with 6 cases like in the movies and rightfully get vengeance because you're brown o Algo? ahahhahahahahahahha
grow up and I hope you starve
I love that you faggots foam at the mouth because I'm mexican, especially when you're brown yourselves. you're not helping your case.
mexicans are 40% white. you're a mutt
prostitution is a 30 dollar fine in Russia. contrary to your racist movies Russians are far more human than you El abominacion.
voted for him twice
its not a race thing guise!!!!
you get what you fucking deserve indio mugroso.
40%? the projection is outstanding but here in reality you still look like shit and can't get a girlfriend because guess what? no you're not good enough. poor you.
I wonder how retarded the latinos who voted for trump are feeling right about now lol but then again, spics aren't exactly known for being the sharpest tools in the shed.
Latinos for Trump are up there tied in the number 1 spot of people I hate the most, next to white liberals and Antifa.
actual minorities don't catch as much of my hatred than the dumb faggots who defend them and globohomo.
This screenshot is of a segment of the debate in the senate which led to the amendment being passed.
Question to the viewers here, do you think that the shit that they said before passing this amendment matters more than the actual wording written down in the amendment?
When does this actually start?
the actual wording is
and subject to the jurisdiction thereof
now you might be asking what the fuck does
jurisdiction thereof
mean? Well thankfully we have the author of those words to tell us written in the congressional record moments before the 14th was ratified.
More like they want Trump's defeat to be broadcast on live TV.
Sure buddy, the opposition can't even muster a counter-argument.
Hey man, I'm a deportation maximalist. Everything I've heard is that the court is highly unlikely to get rid of birthright citizenship.
SCOTUS should rule that they can all take 1 tatted white woman back with them to expedite their self deportation.
You triple digit sat low class motherfuckers know that human genetics are different than cats and dogs right
There are no breeds of great white and great whites can’t breed with other sharks
Not everything can be explained by dogs learn some basic biology ffs
Pick one.
Explain the ruling.
And explain how it was applied retroactively.
You don't explain, because your reasoning is bullshit.
School desegregation. From that day forward, schools are desegregated. Prospectively.
The way things were done, is not valid anymore. Prospectively.
It was valid in the past. The ruling didn't change the validity of it, before that day.
So why on Earth are you calling it "retroactive"?
retroactive /rĕt″rō-ăk′tĭv/
adjective
Influencing or applying to a period prior to enactment.
"a retroactive pay increase."
Fitted or designed to retroact; operating by returned action; affecting what is past;
ALL MY NIGHAS NAZIS HEIL HITLER