Women was always weaker than m-Ack

Toxic patriarchy

That'll be $200,000,000 tax payer dollars for that "probably" (((opinion))) piece.

It's not like they wrestled the animals to death. You don't need that much strength to lay a trap or throw a sharp, pointy speak a few yards. This isn't a matter of strength and is just a stupid argument.

They have hunting related wounds, of course they fought barehanded without traps. They arent pussies like men

(((scientists suggest)))

And they wonder why nobody takes "experts" seriously anymore. The only time females take on male roles or vice versa is when a population is under severe distress and there are critical gaps left unfilled. You see it playing out now in the developed world.

If only

tfw no cavewoman amazon willing to snu-snu me, still covered in boar blood

Gee, I wonder why the public's trust in science is dwindling...

Ditsy cunt probably tripped and impaled herself.

prehistoric kikes were just as bad as modern ones
experts unanimously agree

probably

very scientific

When you have a group of guys head out to "hunt" they are doing fucking nothing but a big circle jerk

In literally every species of predator animal, females hunt as much as makes. Why is anyone shocked? A null hypothesis should be that they did hunt.

Totally makes sense that prehistoric women would just drop their kids off at daycare and go to work hunting for food all day

THIS

and >(((scientists)))

probably

suggest

Yawn.

better endurance

hunting related wounds...blunt trauma, bite marks, broken bones

how do they know they didn't simply got better at being raped ?

probably

suggest

made it up

You can get blunt trauma and broken bones simply from traveling as woman.

Bro, trust the science

The science in question

Yeah, hunting for mice maybe

I'm having a science fatigue, honestly.
I will just add that it's America's fault, thanx for your attention.
I can elaborate but I'm so fatigued

Humans are not naturally predators though

Replication problem. Someone check that paper for Jeets

women consumes more energy and get injured doing so

Nothing burger

But they are weaker. They talk about endurance. What is normal since bigge4 muscle means less endurance. Just why marathon runners are lean.

So why that picture? They wouldnt look like that

Probably

(((scientists))) suggest

men providing for women

The papers doesn't say that, it's just the common popsci article slop playing Chinese telephones with tge scientific articles. Anything written by a journalist is a lie.

What’s a m-Ack

the wandering hunter gatherer was not a predator.

We are the apex of predators.

We have examples of tribal life today and in the recent past. The women stay at camp sewing clothing, cooking food, while the men hunt. It's that way in Africa, it's what the Eskimos do, it's what the Native Americans did. It's the same everywhere and it was the same long ago.

You mean scientists will find your skull and see you had a broken nose, you have to be a world class boxer!

I agree with you. We dont know if she was helping the men hunting, hunting small animals or the wounds were from something else.
I mean she could be babysitting or berry picking than a wild boar appeared and ran her over.

To clarify, the actual paper wrote they found evidence that in some tribes some women participated in hunting. Feminist urinalists went crazy with it.

lol, just like female lions are better at hunting than males
nah, female lions just tend to get more kill because there's more of them
the male lions just handle the shit that could kill a female lion

probably

Human body is not designed for predation on its own because you can't hunt just with your body.
The fish are too fast and the buffalo are too strong and armed (and too fast).
You can't catch or kill anything without some tool because you don't have the fangs or claws.
Wolves have the teeth and cats have teeth and claws.
The comparison of humans to other "built to kill" predators is just plain stupid

dagger found with buried norse woman

"the history is settled, chuds". at least one third of viking raiders, warriors and rulers was women.

fang mark found on prehistoric woman's bone

"the prehistory is settled chuds, women actually did all the fighting and hunting and men just lazed around eating cheetos like lions."

You can bite, kick and punch.

are you muslim? Your 80 IQ is showing.

Joe Pinkstone

I'm not reading shit from some faaaag with a fake name writing about made up nonsense.

Bite a buffalo

Kick a buffalo

Punch a buffalo

Get killed by a buffalo

You get it ?

No they weren’t.

Read up on the evolutionary arms race between the size of a newborn’s head and the size of women’s birth canal. If you’ve ever wondered why a newborn giraffe can fall 2 stories out of mom’s vagina, on its head, then dust itself off, stand up, and start walking, Or why a newborn wildebeest can outrun a hyena in its first day of life, But a human baby can’t even hold its head up unassisted, this will answer that question for you.

Women are borderline non-ambulatory. They are not fit for hip-explosive movements, speed, high carrying capacity, or maintaining stamina for the duration of a hunt.

Honestly, i am more of a wolf pack ideology guy. In my family women always worked. Looking at old stories or paintings women always worked with their husbands.
So i would say women always hunted too but not at the forefront or with the big animals.

How can those who present unsubstantiated opinions as truth be dealt with?

probably

Scientists are just creative writers now.

645 comments

OMG THIS IS LIKE THAT ONE EPISODE OF STAR TREK, now my gf can do everything and I can sit on the couch and go on dating apps.

I've seen this study already. Prehistoric women spent the entirety of their lives from their teens to age 40+ pregnant or recovering from recently giving birth. That the study doesn't attempt to account for this (and the obvious effects it would have on hunting capabilities) is proof the study authors are retarded and/or Jewish.

That’s true for western men

Correct. Without a pointy stick, or Atleast a rock, we are nothing and ludicrously easy to kill.

What separates man from the animals, aside from the strait of Gibraltar, is the ability to throw rocks.

They can hunt my penis with their vagina, if you know what I mean.

probably

suggest

No. Women are smarter, stronger, more agile, more perceptive, have a higher pain tolerance, are more socially gifted, more empathetic, and all around superior to men. Men are obsolete.

What separates man from the animals, aside from the strait of Gibraltar, is the ability to throw rocks.

But "animals" on the other side of Gibraltar can throw rocks and make pointy sticks
You fucked up
How will you get out of this one, anon

No doubt SOME women (not most) would be able to manage a hunt. But only if they aren’t pregnant, don’t have small children to attend to, and are using modern hunting implements like rifles. But the claim that women were successful hunters in prehistory, and did this regularly, and better than men, is just absurd. Have the authors even met women in their lives?

good, women don't need men. now fuck off and stop taxing me. go make womanland or something

You got me. I have no answer and I concede defeat.

aside from the strait of Gibraltar

kek

oh my science

smarter

No

stronger

No

More agile

No

More perceptive

No

have a higher pain tolerance

Maybe, idk

are more socially gifted

Because the don’t have fists, and the social landscape for them is different because they have vaginas

more empathetic

Definitely not but I don’t even think you know what this word means

all around superior

Strictly in the realm of sexual value, but in no other way

men are obsolete

If we disappear, all women die. The converse is also true. If women disappear, we’d prob all just kill ourselves I think

Women are smarter

I doubt. They're mostly retarded bimbos.

stronger

Women are not physically stronger than men

more agile

If you look at Olympic gymnasts, doesn't that disprove this?

more perceptive

Maybe a better intuition but this may be false also

have a higher pain tolerance

Why, because they have to endure pregnancy and a period?

more socially gifted

You're probably right but they're retarded even how they go about doing that

more empathetic

Is it genuine empathy when a woman shows empathy?

all around superior to men

In what ways?
Are you just being ironic, anon?

probably

suggest

and into the trash it goes

hunting related

Those are rape related retard

Note that nothing in your article actually says they were strong it says they had superior endurance thanks to their metabolism (???) which doesn't really prove anything, and it says they had hunting related wounds from marks on their bones, whatever the hell that means. How it is that women hurting themselves with hunting tools badly enough to mark their bones is supposed to prove they were good at hunting I do not know, but even this abject fucking retard "expert" isn't trying to say they were ever stronger than men at any point in history or the archeological record.

Women would be pregnant year round after puberty and have to look after their children while gathering roots and berries (much like shopping for groceries) so it would have been a very special case to see a woman out hunting unless she were sterile and young, since women have such low bone density mothers whose kids have grown up wouldn't be able to start hunting either due to osteoporosis

woman gets mauled by a hedgehog in the fossil record

wow such a huntress

I agree.
I oppose the buzzword that they were apex hunters better than men. Because when you look at it, it mostly boils down that is all a grey think but they blow it up to a black and white.

intellect doesn’t make a hunter

Ok retard.

Science suggest

Have you ever seen women hunt? They are always terrible at it. Maybe a minority of women are good at it, its also possible that in some cultures they had to, but saying they were the better hunters is silly.

suffered hunting related wounds

Or they could have just been attacked by animals because they lived in heavily forested areas. It seems to me this scientist is just disconnected from what spear hunting actually is like.

olympic gymnasts

But really it’s any sport that is physically demanding. Sports are sex segregated for the same reason at sports are segregated into weight-class brackets. Women would never hope to compete. Even non physical sports/activities like chess are sex-segregated.

I think it’s true that on average, the female IQ is a tad bit higher than the male IQ. By like 1 or 2 points. But their bell curve is way more narrow, with a smaller standard deviation. All the world’s retards and geniuses are men, girls more or less cluster around average.

No pussy, no hunt

Well go out with your intellect and nothing else and catch a bear idgaf, you'll get mauled though.

But my intellect lets me have a gun

That's my argument, dumbfuck. Are you gonna start going in circles now ?
You can't think a buffalo into its death, dipshit

So what happened.

Cus all they do now is talk. Suck off Chad for r bbc. shit eat hot chip and charge dey phone

probably

scientists suggest

Lmao they even use specific weasel words to circumvent the fact that they have zero evidence for any of the bullshit they public

you never seen a redneck catch a bass barehanded?

Scientists suggest

Lol herbs

scientists suggest

experts believe

bunk science cooked up in some woke think tank

I’m nothing close to well-read in this field but I want to say that intelligence isn’t a hard requirement for hunting success. Proof: every predator in nature. This is the whole point of instincts. Wild dogs have the highest success rate in Order Carnivora, and they’re relay hunters, sort of like us. Except they’re just dogs running on instinct.

With that said, the other anon is right. You do need to have the physical endowments to successfully hunt in nature. You’re not beating a brown bear to death, or outrunning some ungulate, no matter how smart you are.

Combat sports are segregated*

I've seen them pulling catfish from holes but if that's hunting then collecting scallops is also hunting (it's not).

Women were also better at building, planning and war before the patriarchy took over.

Mammoths hunted to extinction

With spears that don't grow naturally from your arms

Hunt? Sure. Better at it than men? No that's stupid.

That weave.

Redneck =/= prehistoric woman. The Redneck is a man apart, a marvel of nature that defies explanation. Did you know that Florida Man lives in symbiosis with the alligators?

seriously though, it is an impressive feat to catch fish but we did not subsist off fish. We mostly hunted megafauna on land, and this required tools.

Scientists suggest

Herb

I loved these prehistoric cavebabe movies as a kid, so goddamn kino

The prehistoric patriarchy is the reason those female hunters went extinct

Uhmmm.....

It infuriates me to no end that academic domains like this are myopically co-opted for some bullshit cultural war girl power victory.

Anons here have lamented that anthropology, the field of study that tells us all about our history before we starting writing shit down, so presumably one of the most important, consequential, and sacred of fields, is just a bullshit field now taken over by ideologically motivated activists bent on retconning prehistory..

humans have superior brain power to their prey

use it to catch prey

becoming dominant species on the planet

noooo that doesn’t count because humans don’t have claws and fangs

No. I understand your argument. I think it’s arbitrary and capricious. This isn’t even getting into the fact humans are some of the best endurance athletes on the planet which is another physical attribute you’re ignoring for the sake of your argument.

You can't think a buffalo into its death, dipshit

planning isn’t involved in any hunt

Ok retard.

I’m nothing close to well-read in this field but I want to say that intelligence isn’t a hard requirement for hunting success

Because you’re not well read. Which is fine but speculating is silly.

Proof: every predator in nature.

Pack predators such as wolves have complex social skills and have shown planning when taking out prey. Lions show similar higher thinking skills. Even solo predators like tigers show intellect in the way they ambush prey. You and the Croat are taking a surface level glance and going “yeah, the only physical attributes that matter for hunting are claws and fangs, fuck the brain.” We literally have a brain that is able to manipulate the physical world to our will.

You do need to have the physical endowments to successfully hunt in nature.

You’re telling me brain size which allows for better processing of information and intellect isn’t a physical attribute?

or outrunning some ungulate

Endurance hunting is literally one of the oldest forms of hunting on the planet. You can quite literally outrun an ungulate to death or the point of exhaustion to where you walk up to it and stab it to death. This is well recorded.

The truth is that women are better gatherers. They get their little baskets and find all the edible plants. It's why their eyes can see more shades of colors.

Well if "science" says it's real, then it's real. Like trannies sterilizing themselves then declaring themselves the opposite sexual gender when they are now none. Or "vaccines" being safe and effective and us needing to stand 6 feet apart. Or 6 million died. Just random shit we're supposed to believe.

Women weren't better hunters. Why are you memeflaggers posting this? They were likely kept in cages or beaten because they're worthless and weak and dumb and annoying as shit. They weren't out just walking around like it's 2025 and they have the goypolice to save them from their own sluttery and dishonesty and insincerity.

women were better hunters than men because only men suffered hunting-relating injuries

Oh my Darwin! I just fucking love the science!

Scientists found one buried village in Egypt where the people had mended bones and took that smol fact and extrapolated from it that, as a conclusive fact, the pyramids used no slave labor whatsoever kek.

The thing is, scientific studies/journals have become click bait for systemic reasons. In their field, churning out journals etc. is how they advance in academia. Getting published and read extensively is how you flourish professionally. So there is this incentive to come out with some shock click bait tier headline journal, particularly if it jives with the social/political notions of the academic world (feminism, communism, etc.) The point is, no one cares about a journal or study that says

Thing we already knew turns out to still be true

Or

We still cant be sure of thing we didn't know previously

No. I understand your argument.

You don't. My argument is that comparing the human predator to animal predators is stupid. Your own take on it kind of confirms it yet you argue anyway but you don't really know what the argument is about, kek.

or the point of exhaustion to where you walk up to it and stab it to death.

Stab it with ... Hahaha

Scientists suggest a lot of stupid wrong shit
They can't even decide if eggs are good for you or not

I blame it on the popular science, academia is still not yet that far gone (but increasingly catching up with pop sci).

If that's true how come men's bodies are better equipped for long distance running and for javelin throwing?

You’re telling me brain size which allows for better processing of information and intellect isn’t a physical attribute?

It is, I never said it’s not. Look at my PID, I’m the guy that suggested we are nothing without our tools, fabrication and use of which obviously requires a brain. But I think one would consider brain size to be in a category of its own vs all the other physical traits. (Almost) No other predator uses tools to hunt or manipulates its environment, so that is our X factor, into which we’ve put all our points, without which we are nothing.

Pack predators such as wolves have complex social skills

100% a function of instincts. No rational calculation involved. Though I suppose you can say this about literally anything humans do too, since everything is governed by the biological software we’re born with.

outrunning some ungulate

I meant that anon specifically, alone. Indeed, he can’t.

I don’t think we disagree on anything.

My argument is that comparing the human predator to animal predators is stupid.

Because of arbitrary and capricious standards which ignore the physical attributes which make humans the dominant species on the planet. You’re distracted by the shiny and not thinking though the whole problem.

n-no ur just confirming my argument!

Ok retard.

noooo the fact your big brain can use abstract thought to manipulate the material world to make tools doesn’t count!

See above.

No shit. In my lifetime butter went from good to bad to good to bad again.
These people are retarded.

See oils

hunting wounds

Those are discipline wounds

“The holy science” does have the same effect as the church, doesn’t it? “The experts” have replaced the high priests and are that credentialed and divinely ordained class who can issue decrees, and you can’t question it because “where’s your PhD?” It just happens to have that effect. They can sort of issue worldview/software-updates to people, at will, without any pushback. I wish it were not exploited.

Superior endurance? Based on what? There's no data to back this up. Men dominate endurance races and marathons.

AI generated image

bullshit article

it's all so tiresome

I'm sure a woman could hunt a rabbit. Maybe a squirrel

I'll be honest, I've never met a woman that was even remotely as understanding of plantlife as myself. It's an obsession of mine. I basically live in a private forest and wetland and since a child have been fascinated with plants. I (without exageration) can basically ID any plant in the woods or at the very least the general family- and I live in an area with some of the most dense number of plant species on the continent. Most of understanding plants is not even being able to ID them (which is just the basics really) It's being able to ID them in all seasons, or when they are just sprouting etc. its knowing what likes to grow with other things and just getting a grip on the general groups of plants that like to run together in your region. Picking edible plants is mostly about understanding how some type of plant responds to weather and knowing based on the weather wheb and how well it is going to produce that year. Like I can tell you now the brambles and wild plums will he trash this year and the wild grapes will be good based on the weather so far.

There is a certain understanding that you only get from spending immense amounts of time in the woods and a certain fascination and understanding you get from the woodlands and wetlands that I just dont think women have the sensibility for in general. I have met many men that understood things just as well if not better than me but never not once have I ever met a woman that had that sensibility and I have known a number that fancied themsleves as having it.

My God this is such bullshit!!! They did not suffered hunting-related wounds - They were fucking eaten by animals.
I wont even bother with all the "Men have a more efficient heat-regulation", bone-density, muscle-strength, aggression, capacity for violence and so forth and so on.

I'll just ask you this OP you fucking faggot!
- What happened to all these powerful amazon-warriors who were better at running down prey (ah yes I forgot to mention womens pelvis that literally makes run less efficient than men) and fucking murder it violently???

Hmm??

Did they evolve out of it because they were such suckers for penis that they willingly let these weaker men put them in the kitchen for a couple of hundreds of generation or something?

scientists suggest

surefire way to know it's bullshit

But I think one would consider brain size to be in a category of its own vs all the other physical traits.

Which is silly.

No other predator uses tools to hunt or manipulates its environment, so that is our X factor, into which we’ve put all our points, without which we are nothing.

But for our brain size this would not be possible. Take that away and we are as the Croat is describing us. You’re both putting the cart before the horse.

100% a function of instincts.

No, it is not. They’ve done studies on this question and it has been settled for decades. Wolves as individuals have their own personalities and ability to communicate within a pack. They even have the concept of the “other” to distinguish their pack. Different packs have their own hunting techniques and it can change with pack leadership.

I meant that anon specifically, alone. Indeed, he can’t.

You actually can if you’re in shape. It’s called “persistence hunting” for a reason and is still practiced in parts of Mexico and Africa.

Modern women were happier in the kitchen I suggest.

>noooo the fact your big brain can use abstract thought to manipulate the material world to make tools doesn’t count!

No other predator does that

The initial argument was

Humans are just like all other predators

But you say

Humans are NOT like any other predator

ALL the predators BUT humans have ALL the tools needed for hunting GROWING OUT OF THEIR BODIES.
All of them. Fangs, claws, beaks, electric tasers, venom, sound blast that knocks you out, webs, you name it they are born with it.
Any predator that hunts in packs (wolves, lions, orcas etc) can make a kill alone, using just their body.
IF THEY AREN'T TRAINED OR TAUGHT THEY WILL STILL MAKE KILLS
Maybe not as good as the ones who watched their parents kill but they will be able to make a kill.
Try raising a young lion and see what happens.
Humans don't have killer body parts and if they are not trained to hunt they will end up cannibalizing their dead babies.
Humans are NOT the same as "all other predators"

Humans are one of the most flexible and physically capable predators on the planet. You're retard. No you can't punch a buffalo to death but there's way more to hunting than just that.

Women's pain tolerance stems from post-birth resilience and if not a higher rate of self-diagnosed mental illness.

You're both wrong and a complete moron

you put a rock on the end of stick and you have a very nasty weapon that could kill a bear if you hit it right.

Prehistoric patriarchy didnt LET these fierce hunter-women hunt due to small penises and fragile egos. Therefore they put these fierce hunters (who were better at hunting down and murder things bigger than them) into the kitchen. Denied any woman who had fierce hunter-instincts penis for generations until it was bred out of humanity .... Obviously...

Humans are one of the most flexible and physically capable predators on the planet.

But humans are not like other predators, you fucking imbecile.
The mere fact that you say "most flexible" while others are stuck in their niches is proof enough.
I'd like to debate someone who knows what the debate is about for once

No other predator uses tools to hunt or manipulates its environment

Several primates use tools.

OK, go catch a buffalo with your fists and teeth but film it so someone can post it here after the buffalo kills you

good metabolism and endurance

hunting wounds

The ancient try hards

To hunt ?

Based muscle enjoyer.

None of these "scientific finds" are real.

What is the "not like other predators" goalpost move? There are plenty of existing predators on the earth that are "not like other predators". That's not relevant. The claim I have issue with is that "the human body is not designed for predation". This is false.

Yes dummy

Sure they where, i wonder who payed for that study.

What is the "not like other predators" goalpost move?

Lmao you fucking retard, it's literally the original argument how fucking stupid are you

Do tell.

Worse upper body strength reaction time and depth perception

better at hunting

Women are decent at tracking because it's half about spotting disturbances on a flat surface

Women actually beat men in extreme endurance events - longer than marathon.

That chick fucked a 1000 men in a row, a man can't fuck 2 chicks in a row.

They definitely did hunt.
The Artemis myth didn't come from nowhere.
The problem with this shit is the implication that because of some rogue traits that the overwhelming majority of women absolutely don't have, all women are more suitable for this task than all men.
Some men couldn't fire an arrow with 50 years of practice, and similarly, that doesn't mean all men suck at archery.

This whole collectivist view of what humanity is and ought to be needs to stop.
Not everyone is white, some people are shite.
Not everyone's a man, some people can barely cook ham.
Stop deciding for me what I am and what I should be doing. I'm my own God and nothing will change that. Go be your own God for yourself, it's what Jesus would've wanted. And proselytised. And fucking told you to do before the Jews raped his teachings.

The first use of tools by humans was cracking scavenged bones open to suck the marrow out, not a very gender specific task. After that the "hunting" was primarily persistance based where they would follow the animal using our superior stamina reserves to exhaust it and kill it when it was defenselss. Again, not a very gender specific task. Could hunter gatherer societies have functioned more like lion prides? Yes. Did they more likely function like modern H&G tribes in Africa where the men hunt? Yes. Does any of this support their physical equality of the sexes driven bullshit? No, but it won't stop them from pushing the narrative of warrior women to fulfill their fetish and destroy the relationship between men and women.

What?

You said

Humans are not naturally predators though

and

Human body is not designed for predation on its own because you can't hunt just with your body.

These claims are both false and this is what my argument was addressing. Nowhere at any point did I take an issue with humans being unique predators or not. It's not relevant.

I know, that’s why I said “almost”, which you conveniently omitted. Even still, they don’t use them to nearly the same efficacy and utility as we do.

it’s silly to consider brain size in its own category.

No it’s not. You can take any physical trait to its limit for any species and its ecological niche and position in the food chain will not change too much. But if you make even a slight change to brain size, a species shoots up and becomes the dominant species on the planet. So I know one’s brain is part of one’s biology/anatomy, but it’s so useful and valuable that you would consider it in a class of its own. A big brain is what puts man on the moon.

take away the brain, and we are as the Croat is describing us

That’s exactly my point. You could change anything else about human beings and it probably wouldn’t have such a catastrophic effect on our place in the world, but take away the brain or reduce its size to the typical size found in nature and we go back to swinging from trees and picking berries.

diff packs have diff hunting techniques

All in the same environment? With the same prey animal?

I suppose you would need to draw a somewhat arbitrary dividing line somewhere in behavior to separate what is purely a function of instinct and what is the result of calculation. Because even an ant has a brain that it uses.

wow, this thread is why i don't care about humanity anymore. this and all of the israelis pissed we aren't spending money on them so they're attacking christianity wholesale. the timing was uncanny.

no, women aren't superior at ANYTHING but childbirth. ANYTHING else is a feminist construct purposely built to prove a "postmodernist" point that doesn't actually exist. It's the social equivalent of taking a photograph of a toilet and calling it "modern art" and insisting no one else understands it but you even though all you did was lie and be lazy. That's feminists. No one actually believes this, no one tests this, no one is EVER going to put women in a position where they could prove this. I'm so fucking bored. Is this really life now? Just feminist chauvinist dishonesty until death? JESUS CHRIST THIS SUCKS. HOLY FUCK. I AM SO ENVIOUS OF THE GENERATIONS THAT WE'RE FEMINIST KEKOLDS AND COULD JUST TELL THE WOMEN TO SHUT THE FUCK UP AND KICK ANY MEN OUT WHO WERE SO STUPID THEY THOUGHT WOMEN WERE STRONGER THAN THEM.

Chimps are known to use tools to crack open nuts, use sticks to fish, etc. All well documented stuff. Even some non-primates use tools.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tool_use_by_non-humans

Than why in still existing hunting gathering tribes females are literally walking holes

I know, that’s why I said “almost”, which you conveniently omitted

My bad. I genuinely missed that.

Might have something to do with the idea that a 9-month pregnancy is months too short.
The only reason birth happens, is the breaking of water. It's an injury that happens when the pressure exceeds the tissue's strength.

hunting related incidents

you mean a whack over the head with a club because that bitch didn't have any dinner prepared after he almost got done in by a sabre tiger.

You said

Humans are not naturally predators though

In a RESPONSE to the post That says

In In literally every species of predator animal, females hunt as much as makes.

Therefore my argument was that unlike

literally every species of predator animal

Humans are not naturally equipped with hunting weapons therefore the comparison between humans and wolves or lions is stupid.

no kikes to bait them into lowering the cost of labor

not physically possible but people can write whatever they want

is it like lions?

lion actually don't hunt it's only the females

reality is lions do hunt and have a harem of females

Why do feminist try to rewrite history?

9 months is too short.

Yes. Development that would normally take place in the womb takes place outside of the womb for humans. Because for a pregnancy to be longer, the baby, and crucially, its head, would have to grow larger, and so the size of women’s birth canal would have to grow too, and they just can’t do that without making enormous sacrifices in mobility. So we settled on altricial birth and hyper-attentive motherly case.

Most of being a good hunter or gatherer is not as much physical skill as it is just understanding the woodlands intimately after spending alot of time in them almost every day for seasons across numerous years. That's the only way to really get a grip on the little patterns and behaviors that are really all too complex to every truly understand completely. Now having said that the more physically robust a person is the better.

Anyways, I will go to my grave believing women just dont have the sensibility and fascination to spend the time out there and get a grip on this stuff. Im sure there are some out there but it has to be rare. This makes me sad because I would have loved to find a woman who shares this but I never could. I dated numerous that liked hiking and outdoors but that's where it stopped. I mean I'd rather go piddle around from morning to evening and look at the plants and collect some seeds and stuff than I would hike to the top of a mountain or camp and take pictures and all.

And I dont say any of this as a brag, hell when I look back and think about all the time I've pissed away in the woods and swamps piddling it is sort of depressing I mean it was strictly out of personal fascination and wasn't particularly productive rather than having some exceptional native landscaping around my house now.

hunting-related wounds

Which would be?

Chimps are known to use tools to crack open nuts,

Oh,so they HUNT nuts ? Are you OK, anon

use sticks to fish

LOL

All well documented stuff.

Well do share it because Wiki doesn't say chimps "fish with sticks" kek

Even some non-primates use tools.

To hunt ? For what, nuts ? Hahaha

Human body is not designed for predation

yes it is. the human brain is magnitudes better for hunting than any claws or teeth.
"b-b-but only MY definition of hunting counts!"
there are fish who hunt by spitting out of the water

Humans are not naturally equipped with hunting weapons

But this is false. Hands are a weapon. We're not even the only ones. All primates use their hands too.

No

I think there is a bird that will break off cactus' thorn to use as a needle to stab and that way pick up worms from treecrevices.

Quotes only half of the sentence

The full sentence was

Human body is not designed for predation

on its own

because you can't hunt just with your body.

Do you disagree. Are you saying that you can use just your body without any artificial tools to hunt

Hands are a weapon.

Cool, go catch a buffalo with your hands

no retard, there ar lists of payments done for unskilled labor at the site for large work teams, and facilities that took payment (would slaves have money?) in the pyramid construction areas dated to the construction period, plus texts and documents indicating huge slave labor are absent.
The fact is pyramids weren't built once. They were built for centuries and in multiple versions, evolving from various religious and productive construction techniques. Back then they were a combination of religious centers, tourist attractions, political power, tombs AND labor sinks for a large young population. People likely came even from abroad to participate in the construction, because saying "i was there building the pyramid" was a great fucking bronze age resume and a social boost for your average peasant, given they were massive symbols of power and divine influence.

Hunts for worms

Do you consider harvesting shellfish to be hunting

Are we just going into pointless semantics now? Here is a short video that has chimpanzees using sticks to catch termites. There you go.
youtube.com/shorts/OMyUrlid2cQ

Meant for

So now there are biological differences between men and women again? Imagine that

Yeah you could probably technically "hunt" without any tools I mean you can basically walk around without even a stick and pick up tortoises, turtles, snakes, frogs, armadillo, and some other things. With alot of animals its basically just "gathering" more than hunting if you were inclined to eat them.

Cool, go catch a buffalo with your hands

Humans can endurance hunt a buffalo you massive retard. Even with your arbitrary restriction on "hurr don't use a stick", it could still work.

To catch termites

Hunting

When the termites are outside they just pick them up

It's harvesting, not hunting

Fishing and harvesting termites it's the same thing, don't argue about semantics

Kek that's desperate
So, where are the stick fish hunting chimps

They can kinda move away.
Even though slugs are pretty slow you wouldn't say gathering slugs, or would you?
genuinely asking

you just made up your own arbitrary definition of "hunting" that you defend relentlessly like king midwit that you are
keep embarrassing yourself in this thread

They probably only set small basic traps for rabbits and stuff like that and fished. The men were the only ones to do the dangerous hunts

That's not hunting, my dude and not what thread is about.
Of course you could say that

"women were just as skilled hunters as men because they got their bones broken while picking up turtles"

But you better not say it seriously kek

Just like we came from ancient fishes and eevolved, amirite?

probably

suggest

no proof

"wemen stronk and independnt since cavemen"

Made up trash. Bet "scientists" are just watching femdom porn and made this shit up post-nut.

They might be referring to the 'endurance hunting' meme that reddit is strangely in love with. Where a small group of negro cavemen never figured out traps and throwing spears so they would chase an animal until it ran out of steam instead

Humans can endurance hunt a buffalo

Without spears

Yet they never do and you're now clutching at straws.
Also they can't

There really needs to be more caveman movies.

They likely carried knives and spears for rare opportunities and protection while foraging.

No arguments

Uh-huh you're a midwit, OK ?

Your concession is accepted

women was

nigger

Look bozo the clown, you could take one look at those quarries where people were banging out giant blocks with other rocks and be pretty safe in presuming there was some slave labor involved. I mean that is a slave labor job if there ever was a slave labor job I'll tell I'd rather work sugar cane than pound out stone blocks in a quarry... especially given we KNOW they and their neighboring civilizations at the time definitely took slaves in warfare etc.

The bigger problem here is that there are too many confounding possibilities and inferences being made. We can assume there were some skilled laborers and artisans that weren't slaves, we can assume there were some moderately skilled workers that may have been paid, but how can you just assume there were no slaves? I mean this shit happened thousands of years ago are you suggesting you found the Egyptians complete records of the construction? So complete as to remove the possibility of slaves being used? Ok so if you found evidence that SOME people were paid how can you rationally conclude from it conclusively that there were no slaves? Do you realize how little of their records we have even found it is a small small fraction. Its insane really that this sort of logic is acceptable for so many people.

Im only going to respond to the stuff about finding labor records records weed cause all your other points were pure speculation. Interesting coffee table conversation but you'd have to be high on crack rock to seriously base conclusions about the ancient world on them.

catching food suddenly doesn't count as hunting

keep moving the goalposts I guess

Researchers documented 22 cases of chimps fashioning tools to jab at smaller primates sheltering in cavities of hollow branches or tree trunks.

In the vast majority of cases, the chimps used the tools in the manner of a spear, not as probes. The researchers say they were using enough force to injure an animal that may have been hiding inside.

news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6387611.stm

So, where are the stick fish hunting chimps

I meant fish as a verb (e.g. fishing for termites) not catching literal fish. My fault if that was not clear.

Man. You're right. The only ones that come to mind that aren't old stop motion flicks is shit like The Croods and that sucked.

No I think a rock on the ground could see women are not as skilled as hunters at men that's just obvious to anyone who isnt deluded or autistic.

My point was really just that yes you could probably technically "hunt" without tools in some limited way.

You still need a spear to kill the buffalo after it collapses lol. Even if you straight up ran it to death you would need some kind of tool to cut it up and eat it

if I just repeat my arguments in a different tone that will make them less arbitrary and capricious

Lol no. I am saying the human brain is what makes us an apex predator because it negates the need for fangs and claws. We are I born with the ability to think abstractly. This directly plays into how we hunt.

Humans don't have killer body parts and if they are not trained to hunt they will end up cannibalizing their dead babies.

Utter horseshit.

No it’s not

Yes it is and you’re also making the same mistake the Croat is by arbitrarily sidelining that physical attribute to focus on what we lack. The value in which you’re saying it puts us in a class of its own is why we’re the apex predator on the planet. We don’t have claws or fangs. But thanks to our big brains we can smack rocks together and make tools. The physical attribute of a large brain is why we are the way we are and I refuse to put it in its own bucket in support of a flimsy argument.

All in the same environment? With the same prey animal?

As far as I’m aware the studies focused on wolves in the western US and Canada which have similar environments and similar prey species. Larger packs will tailor their hunting tactics to their advantage and smaller packs will do the same. They will target different species at different times of the year to take advantage of the environment. It’s honestly fascinating.

I meant fish as a verb (e.g. fishing for termites) not catching literal fish.

You could simply run it off a cliff.

fun facts but women build the pyramids
also jesus was a women and chinese women build the whole wall of china in just 6 month
1 women can actually beat up 100 bear like easily

Floyd Mayweather is the best boxer in history. Beat all white boys he ever faced and never got as much a scratch.

Look it's semantics now but look at the broader picture and what most anons itt imply and what the argument is about
Picking up turtles doesn't make humans apex predators and in order to be apex they can't use their natural/organic devices, therefore humans aren't comparable to other predators that are born with their weapons

I've never met a woman that was even remotely as understanding of plantlife as myself

Are you geniunely retarded?
Just because (you) can do it, doesn't mean the vast majority of modern society ever learned or practiced it as much as you did. It's an obsolete skill that no one but hobbists learn.
Women have better eyesight in regards of colour spectrum they can see, and noticing subtle differences in colour. Men in contrast, have far better motion detection and depth perception. This naturally leads to young girls being better gatherers and boys being better at hunting(accuracy when throwing rocks and sticks). This matters when you're in the year 15000BC, and need to quickly get kids working on getting food.

Just because (You) personally are good at something, doesn't mean jackshit for the averages for the greater human species.

the human brain is what makes us an apex predator because it negates the need for fangs and claws.

Other predators depend completely on their fangs and claws

Therefore humans are just like other predators

Total moron

I don’t mean the brain is something magical with no connection to biology or time or space. I’m saying it’s unique, and it’s uniquely unique, with no other trait quite like it, and maximizing the size and use of the brain is absolutley preqreuisite to being the dominant species. do you seriously think of brain size as being something equally important to something like tibia length, or the ability to jump? There is only one dominant species on the planet, and it’s not even close. And this species has put all of its points into brain size.

We’re not even really arguing anything desu.

Stop replying to the retard. He think humans arent natural predators because they evolved to use tools. Completely ignoring the fact that humans did so in order to facilitate hunting. We gave up sharp teeth and claws because our brains and hands working in unison can make those out of almost anything that perform much better then what nature could give us.

No I generally agree. I get what youre saying. But I would only point out that if you turned me loose in the woods I wouldnt be overly preoccupied with hunting deer or hogs or anything as primary survival.

I mean depending on the time of year there is going to be alot of wild fruit to eat and other plants and greens and tubers and all. But the big thing would be the pecans and hickory nuts. That's your fat content for the year right there. You can't replace that. They store well you could even press them into an oil. Id probably fish and make traps and pick up tortoises and turtles alot too that's like zero calorie expenditure and involves almost no danger at all.

We gave up sharp teeth and claws

Can you post the text of that declaration, thank you

Opposable thumbs and hands are the best weapons you can have. Your bare hands can easily kill most prey.

inb4 hurr durr you can't punch a whale to death

I'm bored at work today

probably

suggests

Oh, so nothing but rage bait. Cool.

There were a few in the 80’s... don’t remember the name. Some comedy some “serious”

Must have been a scientist in gender studies

Who creates these dogshit threads? Get a real fucking job.

I would have no argument against the fact that it's an obsolete skill I didn't do any of it for utility anyways I did it out of fascination and interest. I mean I'm not trying to survive on wild foods I just like plants kek.

And the gist of the post was that I just dont think women have the sensibility for it, I say this out of extensive experience with men and women in the outdoors. Something about the way women are hardwired just doesn't seem to have this sensibility it is hard to put your finger on. I dont think this happened by accident either I think it is so pronounced that there is something hardwired different here. That's not to say they didn't do it back in prehistoric times or couldn't do it, but that all things being equal the men would probably still be notably better at it.

then why haven't eagles evolved hands yet? they could make some sharp sticks that would perform better than le sharp talons of an apex predator

But I would only point out that if you turned me loose in the woods I wouldnt be overly preoccupied with hunting deer or hogs or anything as primary survival.

I agree with that, I wonder if early humans were actually just catching lizards until the population got so thin they had to start catching other food.
However, although it's meat, animals that do that are generally not considered predators, at least mammals that do it, it's more like an omnivore.
Wild boars eat small animals, gorillas eat bugs, some birds eat just worms and bugs but they aren't necessarily predators.

This headline is misleading. Technically there's two scientists saying this, but they're social scientists, so they don't count as full scientists. Also, the main mouthpiece is really the only one saying it, and she's doing it in the same fashion that Destiny keeps posting pics of himself on here asking why no one from the right has beat him in a debate.

Buy an ad

Yeah, at husband hunting, maybe

Women are smarter, stronger, more agile, more perceptive, have a higher pain tolerance, are more socially gifted, more empathetic, and all around superior to men.

I'll take sexual dimorphism for $100, Alex

Men are larger than women because men historically protect women. Anything a woman does a man can do better, and everything a woman does is effectively a hobby compared to male efforts.

humans are just like other predators

Not my argument but you being an idiot isn’t my problem either. Find another strawman.

I don’t mean the brain is something magical with no connection to biology or time or space.

It’s implied.

uniquely unique

That’s fine. The problem is your argument Is using this qualifier of a physical attribute. Your own words are

You do need to have the physical endowments to successfully hunt in nature. You’re not beating a brown bear to death, or outrunning some ungulate, no matter how smart you are.

The physical endowment which allows us to hunt is our brain size. It gives us higher level thinking which produces tactics and tools. We can kill bears despite of other physical lackings because we can figure out how bows and arrows work and pattern the bear.

do you seriously think of brain size as being something equally important to something like tibia length, or the ability to jump?

In the context of this argument. Yes, given predators generally have more cognitive abilities than their prey. Hunting itself requires it. Read Chapter 5 of Death in the Long Grass. Hunting something like a leopard is tricky precisely because of how smart they are. Hunting a mankiller is even scarier because it has figured out how to pattern humans.

Be me

Genetic Miracle Chad with abnormally high power generation ability and explosiveness

Can command a bunch of muscle fibers to fire at the same time generating immense power

Bone structure as dense as stone, Milk is my water since childhood, Have jumped once from two stories high as a kid and ended up okayish

Cranium So solid can literally break through a wall

So smart i am 10 x ahead of my peers and women both in terms of processing, informational salience ranking optimized AF. can still see limitations of thought of human brain and intelligence.

Yesterday my bitch wife angered me when she was being passive agressive with her noise making . i kicked a chair and it literally exploded probably generated aroud 2-3 k N of force with minimal movement.

Of course women would be doing most of the hunting. As a man back then women would be ABSOLUTE SLAVES... I would have made them hunt and even fight wars because shit would have been so easy. Nowadays i have to contend with police and a whole society that has surpassed my strenght with metal and machines. But my cunning and spirit remains as strong as before and currently playing 4 - 5 D chess to secure and even more optimized system where women serve me without me having to use my natural power...

There was a "study" awhile a go that tried to claim women were the hunters of groups.

Then you look into the actual data and they threw out about 95% of the cohorts analyzed and made their claim on a small group of women in a small group of tribes that were buried with or near to weapons. That was their proof.

wait, so youre telling me there is a god who compels jews to holocaust jews?

and hes supposed to be the bad guy?

Not my argument

It was the original argument I replied to
So why the fuck did you interject, retard, if you don't disagree you moron

I wonder if early humans were actually just catching lizards until the population got so thin they had to start catching other food.

There are a few theories on this, the one that is generally accepted is the environment changed so much in our early history gathering could no longer meet the caloric requirements of a group so hunting larger became a requirement.

So why the fuck did you interject, retard, if you don't disagree you moron

Because your argument is so fantastically arbitrary and capricious it borders on retarded.

Men are larger than women because men historically protect women.

Men are larger to fight other men. Sometimes it's for protection, but that usually only ever comes down to mating opportunities and keeping their genes safe. Stats line up that way in modern times, too.

I'm responding even though I know this is such an obvious Jew D&C thread since I changed browsers and haven't filtered memeflags yet.
Women have vision more oriented in the direction compared to men as peripheral like prey animals have.
Saying that them having a lower metabolism would make them have longer endurance is completely fucking retarded.
And even if this were true, there are about 30 other reasons that men are naturally superior hunters than women.

However, although it's meat, animals that do that are generally not considered predators, at least mammals that do it, it's more like an omnivore.

What?

Predation is a biological interaction in which one organism, the predator, kills and eats another organism, its prey.

If you're catching another live animal, killing it and eating it, that's is being a predator.

The other anon

Humans are just like all other predators

Me

No they are not, other predators grow weapons out of their bodies while humans use a totally different process

You

WRONG !!! Humans are UNIQUE among predators

But since I'm wrong

Humans are UNIQUE therefore they are the SAME

You

But that's not what I'm saying

So what are you saying

I don't know

You are a complete imbecile

but they might be right tho. refer to this : . Although Women might be less optimized for hunting they might have been more than adequate for the task since hunting is still low skill in terms of what Men are able to do. Plus the developement of tools probably made it easier to hunt as well. And on the plus side, if you are sending mothers and some of them die after having given 3-4 offpsring is a net positive for the tribe.

Pinkstone

Too easy.

Did your dumb as just reference yourself as though you proved some kind of point in either post?

Women aren't really good at anything lmfao. My wife impresses me daily with her ineptitude.

memeflag stfu

I did reference myself you have a problem with that you silly bitch ? I reference myself all the time, especially in your mother's cheeks

you're canadian bro summer down

You.

Human body is not designed for predation on its own because you can't hunt just with your body.

Me

it is because we have big brains and that is a physical attribute

You

noooooo that doesn’t count because I say so

You can’t beat a buffalo to death so nuh!

You’re riding the fine line of being a complete fucking retard while calling others imbeciles. Hilarious.

You have to be over 18 to post here

why do you faggots constantly 300+ bump limit these dogshit made up shill threads

are all of you braindead or something

Well no excuse than women should work and be the breadwinner and I should stay home and play Vidya and they still have to fuck me. Otherwise it's sexist!!!

But on a serious note. As a tribe chief, i would not send men for hunting they are too valuable. i would send mothers.

Fuck you mean canadians are top chads

ok silly nerd bitch

because it is interesting and relevant ? you don't like the topic then leave

Quest for fire

shut up you dumbass redditor faggot
YOU are the reason Anon Babble is perpetually unusable

You.

>Human body is not designed for predation on its own because you can't hunt just with your body.

Yes. Do you disagree ?

Me

>it is because we have big brains and that is a physical attribute

Can you kill a buffalo with thinking

You

>noooooo that doesn’t count because I say so

Never said that, you're childlishly strawmanning

>You can’t beat a buffalo to death so nuh!

You literally can't.
ANYWAY
Let's go from the top
The other anon

Humans are JUST LIKE ALL OTHER PREDATORS

Me

No they are not because other predators have weapons growing out of their bodies while humans use a completely different process, we are not the same

You

I disagree because ...

Go

Literally nobody said humans are "just like all other predators". I don't know why you keep arguing against this imaginary strawman.

good ! i enjoy Anon Babble exactly the way it is. seems to me you are the redditor faggot. i would probably send you to hunt with the women because you a bitch....
Back to the hunting grounds/cooking cave you go !

You have to be over 18 to post here

And lemme ask you something:
Who enforces this part?

they play us like a fiddle

gives a new meaning to fiddler on the roof

Can you kill a buffalo with thinking

Also yeah. You can outwit it to run off a cliff so it falls to its death. Old documented technique.

inb4 this doesn't count because reasons

there's no reason to have women kept at homes in 2025 other than being 'le based poster on Anon Babble'. It might have been needed 2000 years ago when life was incredibly hard and deadly but right now it makes no sense

I for one support the enslavement of modern men by gynocentric society

With ancient technology and younger dryas theorists... you could make a movie that really pisses off “(((scientists)))”

youtu.be/MfZMQTkwy5Q

based
based

I just like dinosaurs and bikini cave babes bro

Yes. Do you disagree ?

yes any sane person disagrees, that's a retarded take, and the more you try to pretend tool use, strategy, and logistics doesn't count for hunting the more retarded it looks

Can you kill a buffalo with thinking

yes, it's called running them to death

GOTCHA!!! that's a good memecunt.

probably

More like guessing.

Women can't even hunt a wasp or spider without screaming.

Damn, that's crazy.

Agriculture. Women were hairy and only ovulated every 3 months when we were hunter gatherers.

women was always weaker than m-Ack

Good point! I guess it is the superior male brain that allows us to control, dominate, and subjugate women to do our bidding?!?

thinks he controls women

proceeds to do what women wants him to do

utter cope

or she got the hunting related wounds because she simply sucked at hunting. she threw a spear and it somehow managed to bounce back and hit her in the leg

yahoo.com/news/prehistoric-women-were-probably-better-193819280.html

News article has three sources, two of them are not real sources (literally they just go to a category redirect on Telegraph)

telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/11/29/prehistoric-women-stronger-elite-cambridge-rowers-study-finds/ | Prehistoric women were stronger than elite Cambridge rowers, study finds

telegraph.co.uk/hunting/ | "Hunters"

telegraph.co.uk/scientific-research/ | "Previous Studies"

I fucking kek'd when I saw the "Previous Studies" link just went to a webpage called "research". I thought Anon Babble used to be the deep-diving portion of the internet. Why do so many people no longer take 5 minutes to look at where this information came from?

Nagging at Grug when he returned to cave empty-handed.

I doubt they were better at hunting than men, that is feminist slop. But I think it is plausible some women may have hunted alongside men. Particularly, young women who had not given birth yet, or women with grown children.

But it is typically assumed that women were primarily gatherers, as were their small children. But I can see it as a possibility that in later childhood and early adolescence girls and boys could have been mobilized for hunts.

I don’t believe cavemen really gave a shit or had the luxury to care about enforcing distinct gender roles. In a survival situation, you take what you can get. Some women are definitely built stockier and some have the personality to want to fight so they’re drawn to more “masculine” occupations. Other women are fragile. But when your hunting party is low on manpower and you have a big bitch available, why not?

I am a strong believer in the idea that gender roles are very much an artificial product of industrial society. That the “nuclear family” is an aberration that strips us of our humanity. It is the natural conclusion of the division of labor that started with the agricultural revolution. In fact - if you go further back in time (obviously I am referring to lay people and not the nobility), I’ve no doubt women worked alongside men, and that fathers were equally involved in raising their children.

TRUST THE SCIENCE YOU CHUDS

scientists suggests

experts say

etc.

Idiots.

same energy as "women talking"

Deutsch fren, it is simply slop for those who want to consume garbage why even bother taking it seriously

The Anon Babble thread about this paper completely obliterated it. You'll never guess the ethnicity of the paper's primary author. Just another coincidence.

Pic related is the study's lead author, Cara Wall-Scheffler. The other authors were students in her physiology class at Seattle Pacific University or department colleagues. All are women.

The last name Scheffler is of German and Jewish origin

She has also authored papers on the magic of the female pelvis.

When their data was reviewed, problems were discovered.

It was not possible to ascertain where the relevant text was located that was used to determine women's hunting. As a result, their analysis is not replicable. Further, their coding scheme does not account for the frequency of women's hunting in a society in terms of effort allocated or the amount of prey acquired. Women's hunting was coded as a binary variable and recorded as ‘present’ whether the case was a single report or habitual involvement. There was no minimum threshold for inclusion and, e.g., societies where hunting constituted only 1.2% of women's returns (Marlowe., 2010) were coded as having women's hunting. Beyond brief commentary on ‘opportunism’ in hunting, the results of Anderson et al. (2023) give little indication about the importance or broader societal context of women's hunting activities.

sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513824000497

Pretty much no media outlet, from the New York Times to NPR to the BBC, have issued a correction. The paper currently has been cited 92 times.

Hunting raleted wounds.

Being smacked over the head with a club and dragged into a cave, ain't hunting

You now realize you share the board with people retarded enough to treat that post sincerely

Orcas use fish as bait to catch birds

youtube.com/watch?v=14wWxaMR2Mg

someone has been watching too many disney movies

You know, after an argument with my wife, something dawned on me. We’ll never form a just and harmonious society if we continue to bicker and argue about who is better, who is stronger, who did what x number of years ago, etc. Nobody wants to be defeated in an argument, and nobody wants to be the guilty party, therefore no one will ever admit guilt or concede defeat. But if you think about it also, what sort of gender relations can we build from a foundation where one sex is singled out as the guilty party? The aggressor? The bad guy?

If we really want to work things out so that both women and men are satisfied, we need to start acting like adults. We need to swallow our pride, let go of the past, and agree that the specific details of who did what are unclear. We need to just explicitly and honestly state what we want from one another and what we are prepared to offer in return.

tfw no gorilla cavewoman gf

here's your better hunter

why do blacks love fat asses?

I guess it'd explain who 99% of men worship women, even all the based tards in denial after they drool all over them in a frenzied goon session, worshipping the female form, mummy mummy!

that was found in Austria

it is not like they have a choice

scientists suggest... let me guess, it was a group of female scientists

based common sense poster

Fucking based.

Then it is no wonder why Africans want to come to Europa

Our elite is giving them plenty of choices

No, intelligent males, you know those epic beings who make roads and shit for plastic on wheels

söyentists say

Söyentists have completely trashed their reputations with their support of the covid hoax and unsafe and ineffective jabs. Now only a retard would listen to anything söyentists say

That’s only true for all white men who crave circumcision and sex reassignment for drag queen story time.

Weak white men that lack foreskin and foresight. That’s why white men only win battles against unarmed children and dead people

You mean scientists will find your skull and see you had a broken nose, you have to be a world class boxer!

if your entire body is covered with old wounds but you lived long enough to heal them all probably means the other guy didn't

How can women be better at anything when there are no differences between men and women and gender is a social construct?

How can women be better at anything

bow hunting is more about precision, experience and patience than muscle power

and men are better at all of those things

most men are actually terrified of open confrontation and unwilling to fight

okay and most women are terrified of open confrontation and are unwilling to fight

females suffered hunting related wounds.

How can they tell the difference between women hunter wounds and wounds from women being hunted?