America

capitalist revolution

You already had that. It was called Sodom and Gommorah

Qrd,?

Capitalism has rules

Obviously it doesn't, and it never did. Applying pro-Social rules to capitalists is by definition socialism.

USA always was oligarchy.

Like rashka a kike oligoychy

What are you talking about? Trump is setting America free and giving people the power through him

capitalism led to this...

Just cause you say capitalism doesn't have rules doesn't just automatically make it true. I believe you will find that, in real life, what people give mass consent to is what is the reality of things. People want rules, they want a fair playing field to live their lives on

Maybe so
Sure and communism led to millions and millions of people starving to death. Large, nationwide financial systems only work when people watchdog their own little corner of the world. We have become me lazy and inept and need to change it our way of life will come to an end

Just because you want to pretend that rules exist doesn't make it so. There are no rules and never have been.

What rules are you even talking about? What rules would you have to enforce to make Aryans competitive in capitalism? Here are maybe a few:

1. Strict control of all political financing. Political candidates would have to receive flat financing from the state and get the death penalty for taking private funding. Politicians must be monks dedicated to impartial public service.

2. All accumulation of capital must be individualistic, you can only make money by pulling yourself up by your bootstraps and cannot coordinate within a group of financial actors, since Aryans are terrible at this.

3. Since media is basically mind-control for goyim, all media must be state owned and dedicated to some state identity or state ideology (which would need to be invented from scratch and enforced).

4. Strict limits need to be placed on the concentration of wealth, because history indicates that any system can be bought our and subverted when enough money is spread around.

Basically enforcing rules against capitalism looks exactly like socialism.

oil is not capital

The thing you want is actually socialism, lol.

Blah blah blah, Didn't read
Ya I understand that there are no rules in nature, lol of course, but financial systems are not nature, they are inventions made by man and so, therefore, they are created in whatever image man has envisioned for it. Capitalism of course has rules or else it would just be called anarchy. You do understand that you are not allowed to just walk into a store, grab a candy bar and walk out without paying yes? That is a rule. You can, of course, break this rule and the pay off may be worth it, if you are not caught, but you still broke a rule to get ahead. What is complected about is???

Lol it's actually not

look I know its not appealing or popular or something you saw in a gay hollywood movie but its true. You are just an energy consoomer. Oil is not capital and you didn't make it. You found it in the ground and it comes out of your oil faucet. The demand to produce that energy requires you to immerse yourself in the stupid end products of industrial society that denies you life and requires you to exhaust yourself in futile efforts. Everything you desire can be quantified by the ability to construct right angles in nature with energy you never had to make, and anything that threatens this is swiftly annihilated and conformed to its consumption habits. Yeah I mean the point here is that you didn't make that energy. You just found it. You are more like monkeys in a feeding frenzy who found a pile of bananas and this is the best description of a leftists. You see pol, when you have to actually make your energy you can't live like a bimbo faggot. The faggotry is too expensive for energy producers. And thats what you are. A faggot ass faggot.

Also reason why you can't have nuclear energy is because nuclear energy is more like an energy machine or energy actuator. It does not compare at all to the hydrocarbons that are just there in the ground that you harvest from your oil faucet. Even if you had a box full of infinite energy you would still have to use that to make hydrocarbons. So as it turns out, you already have free energy. It doesn't get any better than hydrocarbons. The fact that you did not have to make these hydrocarbons, that they just exist there and its free, is why you have all the problem that you have (wokeness).

While most of civilization was built upon the storage of capital for later use, what we have become accustomed to is a lifestyle based entirely upon consumption. Saudi Arabia for example, according to Adam Smith, should be the wealthiest nation ever, but in actuality it is only as wealthy as people buy their petroleum products. The moment we found large oceans of petroleum energy we have been constructing an open ended system that requires very little feedback into its maintenance.

Capitalism is just the idea of a free and open market where individuals have the power to set prices through their participation in privately owned enterprises. Enforcing this tenet doesn't magically make it become socialism. Government bailouts and oppressively strict regulation does

and requires a Capitalist revolution to shift the balance of power back to the people

Before fossil energy a community had to give as much or more than what they take to store for later use; like a seed crop or surplus production. The management of limited resources required hierarchy and social planning. Cheap available energy liberates people from the behaviors of feedback in a closed system that would otherwise reward social planning. Everything that a liberal desires can be quantified by the ability to create right angles in nature with energy they never had to make. The hypermoralization in pursuit of surplus energy (feed the world, world peace, end all violence, etc), is an evolutionary mismatch expressed as the need to fill an empty void in the pursuit of endless boundaries absent of limitations. Very few have considered how much their lives will have to change when those limitations become apparent.

If we were to assume a technological society requires existing within an error space that never requires a correction, the probability of any correction to a normal configuration relies entirely on the energy used to supply that system. If we do not have the energy we cannot afford to make such a mistake. An infinite amount of energy consumption only produce a maximum amount of error. All living systems resist entropy by repeating form. A system will usually allocate a certain amount of energy to propagate backwards for error correction, but under certain conditions this fails to occur. This is called control and we understand this as governance.

Notice how whenever a politician encounters a problem, the answer is always to print money and build an institution. This would never work if oil was not abundant. So to a politician today, an error is just another expense rather than something which requires a correction. And that is why nothing ever happens, but this is a very temporary luxury. A system can only function without unity and harmony if it has an abundance of cheap energy. That does not describe our current situation. It only functioned that way in the past based upon ignorance of what is about to occur. There is currently no ideology to represent what life will be like in the future with less hydrocarbons. No one is doing it

Lets just say boomers had it really good their entire lives but especially when they were kids. It was like the best and easiest time to be born a human but that is gone now. If one dollar bought them 30 units of oils in 1965 it would only buy them 3 today. Energy animates life. What made their population "Boom" does not exist anymore. They consoomed it already but they still want it. They cannot imagine life any other way. It is not just boomers though. This trend is true for everyone who experiences less energy abundance as time progresses.

The True Pope already is the current President.

Capitalism is globalism.
If you give business the power, they will open up your borders and sell your sovereignty, culture, ethny, all down the river for a few pieces of silver.
What we need transcends materialist ideas like Communism or Capitalism.

capitalism precipitated the oligarchy tho

The problem arises when you have to input energy to get energy. So since we use energy for everything in the form of petroleum, it is more like inflation. But also there is less return on investment to discover more oil reserves. It takes years to build a well and return an investment. We can all track the rate at which people are investing and discovering and drilling more oil. At the rate we are currently at, demand will exceed production in a few years.

What makes oil so unique is that it doesn’t have to be made. It only has to be harvested. The oil is just there in the ground. The consequence of this is that anyone can make use of it and everyone who uses it does not know how to make it without using oil to make it. It cannot be substituted. It is the primary energy source for everything and feedstock for most industrial chemicals. If you had to produce the hydrocarbon molecules you consume a much different world would exist with far less abundance. When you spend dollars you spend energy, and likewise debt is a lean on future energy production.

GDP is correlated 1:1 with energy consumption along with population growth. Technological development and innovation is correlated 1:1 with population size. The ability to innovate and manage current existing technology requires maintaining the health and size of the population. For example, many people will fail to invent a thing before such a thing is actually achieved. Innovation has an energy cost overburden. Doing such things and maintaining them is only possible with excess surplus energy in a society that is highly managed to achieve that goal.

But if we were to discover that technology and excess energy itself is in some way hostile to living things, like for example low birthrates, these conditions cannot be sustained. Take a look around your city and realize nothing is living. The society you live in is hostile to life in general. It is just as hostile as standing on top of a grenade, or the Newtonian equivalent of standing in front of a car moving at 200 miles per hour. You are continuously immersed in vast amounts of available energy in the absence of all control. For living things this is not survivable.

muh open market!

A free market can't make moral decisions, it is entirely self-interested and material.
If there's not a market for it, it can be created. You don't want free markets unless you want trannies to exist.(that's just the easiest horror industry to point out)
I want libertarians to hang next to the progressives. Degenerate hedonists with nary a conception of God or hierarchy.

The thing you want is actually socialism, lol.

Yes, National Socialism, not gay and retarded internationalist marxist jew communism.

And communism precipitated dictatorships. No system is perfect but I prefer a free and open market

Capitalism doesn't straight up facilitate power into the hands of corporations. Infact I would agree that is gives average consumers considerable leverage over the market. It took a hundred years for a "revolving door" to be installed into our political system and I agree that the answer is to remove the door

You just have a committee of dictators now.
Truthfully it really doesn't matter what system you're under, power works the same and the masses don't have any. The organized minority will get exactly what they want while the majority get nothing.

That's little bitch talk. I don't speak little bitch talk

In capitalism the people with the capital set the rules, that's how it works. If you want to set new rules you will basically have to expropriate all capital from the current elite and make sure they can never accumulate it again. Maybe learn something about the last group of people that made some anti-capitalist reforms:

Hitler on democracy and capitalism:
argentbeacon.com/films/alerta-judiada/adolf-hitler-the-man-who-fought-the-bank/
Goebbels on Jews:
argentbeacon.com/films/alerta-judiada/the-jewish-problem-dr-goebbels/
Hitler on Palestine:
files.catbox.moe/oswmzk.mp4
Hitler on why they hate Germany:
files.catbox.moe/kzc2z0.mp4
Hitler on art and culture:
files.catbox.moe/4lbitt.mp4
Hitler on race:
files.catbox.moe/czva93.mp4
Hitler on the meaning of Europe:
files.catbox.moe/ud7q94.mp4
Hitler's war for all mankind:
gofile.io/d/de2Z4I

There is no grassroots revolution and populism is a mirage used by special interests.
I hope you recover from your delusion.

1-4

All of these are just problems that occurred with the separation of church and bank. Some might just say there never was a separation of church and bank. What church is your bank? Because everyone knows you don't have a church or a king or anything of the sort

National Socialism

communism

socialism

Lets be real. Heidegger is the only relevant idealist

The only system that has ever put power in the hands of the average citizen is a free an open market facilitated by capitalism

is freedom of will expressed without the unfree will of others or is total freedom just the unfree will of everyone

how many legions does he have?

In capitalism the people with the capital set the rules, that's how it works.

Correct and guess who has all the capital, it's the combined spending power of the average citizenry. When you read statistics like 1% of people own something like 90% of the wealth they are talking about assets. And it's true, 1% of rich people do own like 90% of all the things but the raw money is still in circulation with the common classes. If the major corporations owned all the money then advertisement would be unnecessary, taco bell would just say "you are eating taco bell on Tuesdays" and you would eat taco bell Tuesdays. Elon musk may have hundreds of billions but the combined spending power of the American consumer base is in the hundreds of trillions

It's the other one

No. As long as I am forced to suck oligarchical cock, I will stay nice and comfy in my delusions, thank you

here ya go

What I'm saying is that any movement that crops up will have either been an invention of the elite or will be coopted by them.
Elites don't all share the same views, but they'll be damned if they'd ever relinquish actual power and control. Democracy in general is just full of this pipe dream, slop thinking.
Every revolution in history has had powerful interests behind them, there'e no getting around the necessity of financing.

That is not how leadership works actually. Power is the one field where superstition does not survive. The degree to which that organization does not reciprocate accountability provides an accurate estimation for power vacuum it creates around them

Agreed but I think that """they""" over played their hand this time. Selling the plebs the idea of freedom, as a control mechanism, is starting to backfire. Idk if they ever truly considered the possibility that we would completely and fully internalize the concept and then, attempt to make it real. We'll see

but they'll be damned if they'd ever relinquish actual power and control

you and AA are just as wrong. They don't have control and that is the totality of your problems. No one has control. Yet there are things you can control. AA really does sound like granny talk. fuck that. You can do things

its a trick question actually. Nietzsche realized that to exercise will he has to control himself. Control is innate to all purpose built mechanisms.

I don't like the word collapse. We really have to frame this correctly. Is bringing the world into being a catastrophe?

And it's true, 1% of rich people do own like 90% of all the things

it is not certain if their wealth is worth anything. Jeff Bezos did not buy a billion donuts this morning, and there is not enough farmland for Bill Gates. Everyone knows their property is overvalued and we cannot fulfill all the total obligations for the money we printed. Many things we value are worthless without cheap oil like working in an office and living in a suburb

Irrelevant, there is no such thing as ''average citizenry'', it is just a mystery-meat rabble. The elite are all unified by blood and culture, they act as a cohesive unit and easily override the wealth of any individual goy, even a billionaire. Read Kevin Macdonald's trilogy on Jewish power.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Culture_of_Critique_series

I totally agree. It's all essentially artificially manufactured wealth

The elite are all unified by blood and culture

This is myth is provably false. Its more like they are giving you a tour of the underworld. Like how often are the Amish being defeated by the phantom jew? Just point out the Amish are succeeding in all fields other than faggotry and this phantom vanishes

here is the real one

ia601002.us.archive.org/12/items/ANONTheGreatJewishMasque1953V.1/ANON-The_Great_Jewish_Masque_1953_v.1.pdf

Look I get it. People are hard to trust with even a drop of power because of inherent corruption within man. But, I propose that the collective will of this nation can balance or even over come that. People want rules. They want a fair and level playing field. If this country can get over itself and demand that they get what they pay for, out of their government, out of their financial system, then we can start something new and powerful. A Capitalist revolution

well they kinda have to print the money to keep the energy flowing, and everything increasing in value as your salary decreases just represents the rising cost to mine more oil and minerals. Inflation is basically just oil well depletion. They have to print the money so that liquidity is available to finance oil and gas discovery. We drill and frack millions of wells that only produce for na couple of years

This is myth is provably false

Our so called liberal states imprison any Aryan that looks askance at a nigger while openly supporting the most brutal genocide the world has seen in hundreds of years. All of our politicians and oligarchs are openly blackmailed by Jewish pedophile syndicates. All pretense is over, Jews are the sovereign, no one else is even in the game.

I don't know if capitalist revolution is the best word for it but yes, it is happening, and by their actions it does appear the leadership are aware of the issues I have presented itt. Scott Besset framed the problem perfectly as two competing economic theories: a) cogs in a machine , or b) a living organism/system (picrel)

yeah your phantom menace. A real ass in a lion's skin. The Amish have discovered some super power to shield themselves from faggotry. How did they do it. How did they overcome the populist delusion?

symbolic recursion the proof