3 weeks jail for something that deserves no more than a warning
I dont even understand the offence here
He didnt even touch her buttocks
He only held her by the hips most likely because
Like a typical entitled Chink woman she was blocking the way
Granted that maneouver went wrong and she got pushed in the wrong direction
But he didnt deserve this
very unfair saar he was just giving her a surprise cuddle like his uncle gave to him.
poo accused of rape
He did it.
woman
She deserved it
Totally unfair. Don't they know that the CEO of Microsoft is Indian?
Only Indians and homosexuals find toilets romantic
I know, I'm more shocked he got that at all
retarded jeet assumes it was a chink stwardess
He must have tried to pull some moves on his own as she's lower chaste for being a waitress in the sky.
What exactly was the offense here. Please explain that to me
Pajeets being outside of their containment.
Three weeks is a joke. There's now an online petition to get this shitskin rapist caned as well.
rapey dalit doesn't understand why he can't rape
to put it in terms you shit people understand, the entire world is of a higher caste than you people, and you lower castes don't get to touch your superiors, and just because a street shitter is microsoft ceo doesn't grant you and all the other street shitters a caste upgrade over civilised people
Same question to you
jibber jabber
Answer the question instead of babbling like a low IQ retard
Truly an animal level of lack of self-awarness and self-reflection
Being brown in a developed country is offensive enough
Molest and attempted rape. Maybe those are acceptable behaviours in Shitdia but not anywhere else. You just have to trust me on this.
Molest
How? He didnt touch any of her private parts
rape
Do you even know the definition of rape
Don't touch people without their permission if you don't want to be met with permanent injury or significant imprisonment.
If you attempt to touch someone without their permission, and do not succeed, you are still guilty of the crime. The attempt is crime enough.
If you tried to touch me without my permission I'd kill you on the spot.
Being born.
Don't touch people without their permission
That part I understand. Which is why I said he deserved a warning
My point is there was no sexual contact.
Therefore it is not molestation as is conventionally understood
Putting both hands on her hips and pushing her into the bathroom along with him is a very clear indicator of his intention. He deserve to get a way harsher punishment.
On the off-chance that he was indeed not trying anything unruly towards the woman, he still should be imprisoned for life for being a streetshitter.
Of course you don't understand, you are a fucking jeet lmao
a very clear indicator of his intention.
How can you determine his intention
From the descriptions, it appears that the chink air hostess was blocking the way to the toilet
This. If we were living in the good times before the jewish clown world that street shitter would have been hanged
Why?
Do you think even touching a woman is molestation now?
If you hold a knife in front of a woman, you could be charged for attempted murder. Same logic can be applied here to charge him for attempted rape.
Heh, its situational and depends on local culture. You can brush your crotch against some woman in a crowded bus and she will be just mildly annoyed and tell you to move.
A touch even on shoulders can be interpreted as molestation if you are ugly enough and the culture of that place is more feminist.
You don't touch other people you fucking jeet, period.
Same logic can be applied here to charge him for attempted rape.
Only if you are retarded
From the descriptions provided
There appear to be no attempt to make any kind of sexual contact
Stop being such an embarrassing simp man
Grow a pair
Alright, let's try this scenario. You, Pajeet, are on a flight and want to walk around the plane for whatever reason. You spot a female flight attended cleaning the bathroom, by doing so she's somewhat blocking the way. Now, what should you do?
have patience and wait for her to finish cleaning up
ask her if she may let you pass
grab her by the hips and force her into the bathroom with yourself
There is one very, very wrong answer here. Do you know which one it is?
Checked. I didn't say the basis of such logic isn't retarded. But you have to be consistent. Dura Lex, Sed Lex
ok
He skipped leg day
Meanwhile a fat American demanded an Asian stewardess to wash his ass and she did
If he was Indian it be over
I already admitted grabbing her by the hips was wrong and does merit a warning
But is it molestation? I dont think so
Not gonna waste my time arguing with an Indian regarding the definition of sex offenses. If you think you guys are unfairly treated then just stay out of my country.
Let's be real here: who among us hasn't manhandled a cuteypie stewardess into the shitter for a quick romp onboard an international flight? That's what I thought. Glass houses et all.
This man probably does not even know what a sexual offense is
He probably thinks a man touching a woman is already a sexual offense
Men like these pave the way for the feminist hellscape
lmao
pushed his way in to the toilet
he will face persecution for this back in india
i hope they cane that nigger
Would you be happy for a stranger to touch your wife like that?
He's a jeet so we already know he wasn't planning to use the toilet for its intended purpose.
I'm an incel but if your are referring to close female relatives
No I would not be happy if anyone touched them like that
At the same time I would be happy with a public acknowledgement of the wrong
And a warning to the offender
Perhaps even a one month flight ban
But three weeks jail is completely out of proportion
These Singapore people look like complete flakes
what good would a warning do? all the jeet would do is pretend to be sorry in public, then carry on putting his unwanted brown hands on other women the next day. maybe jail will get the message across in a more permanent way. they should cut off his hands after the public flogging to make sure he doesn't do it again.
What exactly was the offense here. Please explain that to me
Perhaps some of us believe in the rule of law
And dont believe in arbitrary punishments for imagined offenses
I know its difficult for people with Low IQ to understand
She should not have given mixed signals if she did not wish to be loved by generous strangers saar. When a woman bends over we do the needful.
Perhaps some of us believe in the rule of law
Singapore certainly does, kek
And dont believe in arbitrary punishments
It's probably all done according to Singaporean law. Don't do crime in a foreign jurisdiction if you don't like it, you ganges river floater.
for imagined offenses
And what do you imagine your fellow countryman would have done to that woman after he grabbed her and forced her into the toilet with him? Make her watch him shit? Here's a tip, you 20 IQ dung beetle - if you push a stewardess into the toilet with you for getting in your way, then there's less room in the toilet for you to stand on the seat and shit all over everything except the bowl. But I understand using a toilet is too complicated for you people, it's just an airborne rape cabin for you.
I know its difficult for people with Low IQ to understand
I'm not the one who cheated on my university exams to obtain my degree, unlike you, toilet boy
All this blabber
And the half with cannot explain what the offense is
Truly Low IQ
I dont even understand the offence here
Oh that I have no doubt. They should have excuted that jeet fuck.
half with
*HALF WIT
indians are so digusting I wouldn't rape any of their women and yet they would rape all women outside of their species even the niggers
Of that*
Touching anyone without their permission can be charged as "assault".
AI Overview
Learn more
In legal terms, assault is generally defined as an intentional act that puts another person in reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact. This means it doesn't require actual physical harm, but rather a reasonable belief that physical harm is likely. The key is the threat of harm and the victim's fear of it, not the actual contact itself.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
Intentional Act: The action must be deliberate, not accidental.
Reasonable Apprehension: The victim must have a reasonable belief that they are about to be harmed or offensively touched.
Imminent Harm: The threat of harm must be immediate and likely to occur soon.
Harmful or Offensive Contact: This refers to touching that could cause harm or offend a reasonable person.
No Physical Injury Required: Assault can occur without any physical injury being inflicted.
Words Can Be Part of Assault: Words, combined with other actions, can contribute to an assault claim.
Captcha: SAR00
unfairly
Alright. This one actually seems to speak with a coherent mind
So what is the imminent harm here?
Well for your low IQ jeet mind, the boolean function in the legal definition is "or offensive contact", where or results in true under the conditions where either or both are true.
The fact of the matter is that jeet was a low IQ animal who acted on animal behavior. I would have treated him like an animal and put him down myself because he's subhuman, but he got off light for 3 weeks.
Looks like I spoke too soon.
Another rambling tangential rant
Lol, dalit toilet boy can't even speak the language of his colonial masters properly, let alone understand why his lower caste friend was subject to Singaporean legal jurisdiction, and he has the temerity to comment on the IQ of his betters. Your own IQ is inversely proportional to the height of your mumbai trash mountain. Bet you don't even know what that means because the only language you understand is shit and rape.
saaar, please to not use the big words, dalit not educated like superior sir and gets easily confused
Always remember, every jeet is a dalit to everyone else in the world, including niggers.
HOW JAHAMJAGAR CAN THEY PROSECUTE
BLOODY HOW?
Singaporean legal jurisdiction
And yet the scholar here
Cant identify and explain exactly what offense he was charged with under said jurisdiction
Dont touch people unless they say you can you fucking retarded nigger if you touch someone with out thair Prohibition we throw your ass in an 8x8 cell
3 weeks in jail
Holy fucking soft punishments. We used to lynch people for shit like this and he's going to get food delivered on a plate and a toilet (i.e. living like a king) for 3 weeks.
I already admitted grabbing her by the hips
He shoved her into the toilet
Just when I thought I couldn't hate an Indian enough, I come in here and watch one try to defend pulling a woman into a bathroom with yourself by her hips. Over 18 posts no less.
It says he 'pushed' her into the toilet not shoved
We used to lynch people
Thank the Divine Cosmic Good your side got badly hammered in the Civil War
And still cant stop whining about this
I don't have to, a judge in Singapore already did the work for me. You'd know that, if you weren't so stupid. You go and look, then file a complaint if you're so bothered about what happened to your fellow toilet boy. As for me, i'm going to find that petition calling for the cane and sign it.
Correction
It says 'pushed HIS WAY into the toilet"
which further indicates his intent may have been to push her out of the way
Oh so that’s how it is. Your race never had human rights, but the instant another race applies your culture to you you’re enraged. Racist much?
So you dont know what offense he has committed under Singaporean law
You just have a habit of talking through your ass
Half Wit confirmed
Holy shirt your general low intelligence and lack of awareness and social cues is somewhat astonishing.
I know you're all literally scientifically mentally retarded.
But wow buddy.
Wow.
He shoved her into the toilet and flushed, ejecting her from the plane and killing her. However she made a full recovery
We have an actual rape jeet in the thread lmao
How have you animals devolved so bad since we let you go free?
Same question to you
cleanest toilet in india
Bro are you a troll or a genuine pajeet. You're not doing the toilet rapist any favors with your thread.
All you've succeeded in doing is making another 60 people utterly disgusted, and cemented their hatred for your country, culture, and people.
Seriously, take the L and leave the thread. Try again another day.
Gaslighting yourself to think you've somehow outthought all of these anons and their points is mental illness.
You are physically, literally, mentally unwell.
You need psychiatric assistance, but unfortunately nobody in India cares or is qualified to do anything more than mix cow shit with yogurt.
existence jeets arent welcomed anywhere
filthy jeet cannot even grasp the concept of sexual assault
You cannot make this shit up
What exactly was the offense here. Please explain that to me
Assault, battery, sexual assault (or attempted sexual assault), sexual battery (or attempted sexual battery), kidnapping (or attempted kidnapping).
You can't touch people without their consent, and you can't drag women off to a toilet to rape them.
I realize you won't understand any of this, Shitjeet.
I need np lectures in morality from a depraved racist
Who thinks lynching black people was a good idea
But you apparently do lol
After browsing pol the last few days I have come to the conclusion that Indians are master-baiters, truly kings of shit stirring figuratively and literally
Assault, battery, sexual assault (or attempted sexual assault), sexual battery (or attempted sexual battery), kidnapping (or attempted kidnapping).
Good. Now explain to me how all of this is proven under Singaporean law and the specific sections of it
You so beautiful ma'am, you poo with me?
In Singaporean law, assault and battery are distinct offenses. Assault involves intentionally causing someone to believe they will be subjected to immediate and unlawful force, while battery is the actual unlawful application of force. Sexual assault (including rape) and sexual battery involve non-consensual sexual acts. Kidnapping involves unlawfully taking or restraining someone, and attempted versions of these offenses involve actions taken with the intent to commit them but without completing the full act.
concept of sexual assault
Another man with a poorly developed brain
Thinks the event described constitute sexual assault
But just like the other retarded people in this thread
Cannot explain how any of this constitutes sexual assault
Can you provide me to a quote to those specific sections
3 weeks in jail is a "warning" in a civilized and orderly society.
In jewmerica you can rob dozens of people and get no time if you're non-white and a minor so that's probably where your confusion is coming from
Under Singaporean law it absolutely constitutes sexual assault.
Regardless, are you a Singaporean judge? Does your lack of knowledge and shit opinion qualify you to absolve this man of being a rapist? No, not really.
Take a Xanax and calm the rock down rhabdool.
Under Singaporean law it absolutely constitutes sexual assault.
See
Since I think that you genuinely don't understand the issue, I'll try explaining it. See, sexual assault does not have to be rape with a dick going inside a vagina. Any act that you do that includes touching with a sexual motive, falls under "sexual assault". It's not even a woke new thing, it's the law here, and since we use continental law (ours derived originally from Italian penal code) I reckon it's similar in pretty much every fucking civilized country. Think of it like this, it's basic sexual assault. If you go further, like get the victim naked, put the penis or any other object inside, it becomes more grave hence gets more punishment.
I've never been to Singapore but knowing some stories that I've heard I say the pajeet got lucky. Usually they're too fucking strict and harsh with their laws.
The Penal Code also covers attempted offenses of these crimes. For example, section 511 of the Penal Code outlines the penalties for attempting to commit any crime punishable with imprisonment, which includes attempted assault, attempted sexual assault, and attempted kidnapping.
Chal hat chootiye
kahi aur jaake goro ka maalish kar
Good. Now explain to me how all of this is proven under Singaporean law and the specific sections of it
1. This case would be proven by witness testimony and probably security cameras on the airplane. The stewardess would testify that the subhuman rapejeet grabbed her in a sexual manner and shoved her in the bathroom. The jury would convict, since everyone knows that all Pajeet males are rapists.
Feel free to Google Singapore's criminal codes to find the particular statutes criminalizing assault, battery, sexual assault, sexual battery, kidnapping, and the attempt versions of these crimes. I'm not writing a legal memo for you.
Okay what is the 'crime' he attempted to commit?
no saar i am from good family its just the pakis/kikes we worship making us look bad saar bloody bich show bobs rape u later bb
your entire race is a disgusting shit stain on the planet just die man
This case would be proven by witness testimony and probably security cameras on the airplane
Do you have any evidence of this are you merely speculating about this
Feel free to Google
I dont have to Google shit. If you make the claim you have to provide the sources
In Singapore, attempted kidnapping constitutes an offense when an individual intends to abduct or wrongfully restrain a person, but fails to complete the action. The act must involve a specific intention to hold the victim against their will, and the accused must have taken steps that significantly further that intent, even if they don't fully succeed in abducting or restraining the person.
touching with a sexual motive
What part of the provided description of events indicates a sexual motive?
Okay what is the 'crime' he attempted to commit?
He committed assault and battery. He also committed either sexual assault, sexual battery, and kidnapping or the attempt versions. The article isn't clear enough as to what exactly happened for me to say with certainty, but I believe he committed assault, battery, sexual assault, sexual battery, and attempted kidnapping.
All Pajeets are rapists, so we know he's guilty.
Today the loo poos on us
Tomorrow we poo on the loo
SAAR! GOOD MORNING SAAR!
We will redeem!
We will redeem!
We will redeem!
We will redeem!
We will redeem!
We will redeem!
We will redeem!
We will redeem!
We will redeem!
We will redeem!
We will redeem!
We will redeem!
We will redeem!
We will redeem!
We will redeem!
We will redeem!
We will redeem!
We will redeem!
tarnishing indian image
lol, lmao even
What happened with the Pakistan war?
You think this was an attempted kidnapping?
Is that part of the charge
Do you have proof of this?
Hands on hips and forcing her into a small confined bathroom.
Sorry jeet its an open shut case.
The rapist tarnished your country's reputation and there is nothing you can do about it.
He attempted, and failed to restrain the individual against her will. This constitutes attempted kidnapping. Amongst the plethora of other charges he will face.
Yes. Judging from the evidence and story presented. He is guilty of attempted kidnapping.
In short Duke, a shit storm.
He committed assault and battery
Are these your personal statements
Or are these derived from actual Singaporean records of the above
This case would be proven by witness testimony and probably security cameras on the airplane
Do you have any evidence of this are you merely speculating about this
Ten years of practicing law.
Feel free to Google
I dont have to Google shit. If you make the claim you have to provide the sources
I don't have to provide you with an exact statutory citation to know what the crimes of assault and battery entail, you filthy subhuman.
Assault and battery and related crimes like sexual assault and kidnapping are pretty much universally defined the same way in all civilized countries.
There is nothing there that says he was forcing her into the bathroom
Read the news again
"he was pushing his way into this toilet, which resulted in the victim also getting pushed into the toilet"
No indication of actual intent to push her into the toilet
thanks saar, i hate jeets and jews (BIRM) just a little more, thanks to your efforts here today.
Assume this Assume that
Trust me bro
ok
Um your opinion still isn't qualified because I say so
Go to Singapore and ask them about the case yourself because I'm in India and too poor I will accept no less proof saar
The excerpt states that Rajat approached a victim, placed his hands on her hips near her buttocks, and then pushed his way into a toilet, causing the victim to enter as well. This scenario raises several legal issues under Singaporean law, particularly concerning sexual offenses and trespassing.
Relevant Legal Provisions
Sexual Offenses: Under the Penal Code of Singapore, specifically Section 375, rape is defined as having sexual intercourse with a woman under certain circumstances without her consent. Additionally, Section 376 addresses punishment for rape. While the excerpt does not explicitly mention sexual intercourse, the act of touching someone near their buttocks can be construed as an unwanted sexual advance or harassment.
Outrage of Modesty: Section 354 of the Penal Code criminalizes acts intended to outrage a woman's modesty. This includes any act that involves physical contact with a woman’s body without her consent. The placement of hands on the victim's hips near her buttocks could fall under this category if it was done without consent and with intent to offend.
Trespassing: Entering a toilet without permission may also constitute trespassing if it is done unlawfully or with intent to commit an offense therein. In this case, if Rajat entered the toilet intending to engage in further inappropriate behavior or harassment, he could be charged under laws pertaining to unlawful entry.
Analysis of Guilt
Based on the actions described:
Unwanted Physical Contact: The act of placing hands on someone's hips near their buttocks can be interpreted as unwanted physical contact that may constitute an offense against modesty.
Entering a Toilet: Pushing someone into a toilet against their will can indicate coercion or intimidation, which further complicates Rajat's legal standing.
Cont.
Given these points, if Rajat's actions were indeed non-consensual and intended to intimidate or harass the victim, he would likely be found guilty of violating multiple provisions under Singaporean law related to sexual offenses and possibly trespassing.
Thus, based on the information provided in the excerpt and applicable laws:
Rajat is likely guilty of violating Singaporean law due to unwanted physical contact and potential harassment.
You're merely ASSUMING that people saw the horrified stewardess get pushed into a bathroom by a rapejeet and that she testified against him?
Yes?
I thiink more than ever that you are a real rapejeet, because you cannot even COMPREHEND basic human reactions to seeing someone being touched and pushed into a confined space
While the excerpt does not explicitly mention sexual intercourse, the act of touching someone near their buttocks can be construed as an unwanted sexual advance or harassment.
That is your interpretation
I say he held her at the hips and attempted to push her OUT OF THE WAY
Because she was blocking the way to the toilet
If he wanted to shit he would have shat in the aisle, as is tradition in india.
This is an artificial intelligence analyzing the context of the scenario and applying it directly to the actual Singaporean laws.
What do you do when you need to go to the toilet and some idiot is blocking the way?
You literally weren't there, how is your interpretation as valid as those of the people who were on the plane?
You ask then politely to move. You don't grab them by their hips and take them in the bathroom with you king dipshit.
That is nice but the AI can be wrong
So can you. I wonder which is more likely.
No I am providing an alternative explanation to the people
Claiming without evidence that this is sexual assault
Probably, what if he did
In any case the point is the
The actions described in the news reports in no way confirm sexual assault
Its merely speculation
No you are justifying your kinsman misconduct abroad in an attempt to save face while simultaneously acting egotistical and lashing out with ad hominem attacks against those (everyone) who disagrees with you.
It's speculation until the point he is tried and found guilty in court. You are correct. However speculation exists to add evidence to a case. And in this case speculating that a dirty street shitter wanted to cop a feel of some nice Asian pussy isn't very much of a stretch.
Like I already stated its misconduct
But from the description provided it isnt sexual assault or molestation
Or any of the other similar colorful words used to describe the above events
I guess the judge will determine that, won't he? We are all thankful you aren't a judge.
tried and found guilty in court
Okay what was he found guilty of in court?
Do you know?
I'd imagine he hasn't been tried yet. And if he has, probably, yeah. Regardless, you're disgusting, your country is disgusting, and frankly we couldn't hate you more if you tried, you pregnant dog tit ducking, lizard raping, grandpa funking, River shitting degenerate retard
get someone out of the way of the tiny aircraft toilet by pushing them into the tiny aircraft toilet and following them in
High caste indian education on display, everyone.
saar what would you do if you were high class brahmin and someone was blocking your way saaar
Toilet boy could have just asked her politely if he could get past, but no, high class brahmin is above such politeness and just shoves people into his own way in his eagerness to befoul the facilities for everyone else.
saaar grok confirmed it
did not touch private parts
Nta, but it doesn't need to be bob, vagene or ass to count as "outrage of modesty". Loudly calling a woman a slut will also get you in trouble. Jeets' nationally accepted standards for rape are very high.
nuh uh, your standards are the ones that's retarded
Irrelevant. Learn the local rules before fucking around, or it's on you. The jeet got a merciful judgment already accounting for him being a foreigner: if it was a local who did this, they would have gotten the lash + up to 7 years. Reminder: upskirt photos here will get you an "outrage of modesty" criminal charge. That's the expected level of public behaviour. PLEASE fafo.
but it's just the hips!
Which is an erogenous zone. Same as thigh, neck, belly. If you really need to touch someone to get attention, tap the shoulder and elbow as a last resort, or say "scoos me maaaam.'
How can you yap so damn loud and long in Tamil and Hindi to each other, but you can't say "scoos me maaaam" as a first resort? Disingenuous. Everyone that thinks like you needs vitamin C.
Same question to you
What offense is he charged with under Singaporean Law
And what are the relevant sections?
was he a brahmin
You don't touch White people, period, you fucking disgusting jeet.
I am a man and if you ever put your disgusting jeet paw on me I would break your fucking skull
Forget it, hes not listening. I know law enforcement in your country is a crapshoot. Let him come over and try ours. If enough jeets do "touch is not rape" here, one of them will get the full measure of the law as an example. DYK, getting rotan lashed has a % chance of permanantly disabling the male sexual function? What a useful colonial relic it is.
which section
354
Whoever assaults or uses criminal force to any person, *intending* to outrage or **knowing** it to be likely that he will thereby outrage the modesty of that person, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 3 years, or with fine, or with caning, or with any combination of such punishments.
I remind you that spitting or touching a person can constitute assault. Using the same measure, just "pushing her away by the hips" can constitute molestation.
No need to take my word for it, I'm a just a native who lived here all his life By all means come over and try your luck. Fly SA Quantas.
Okay do you have a source that the person in question is being charged under this section of the law?
POO IN LOO
O
O
I
N
L
O
O
I didn't ask you to assume anything. I explained exactly what crimes this filthy rapejeet committed in detail. You lack the mental function to understand the explanation, because you're also a filthy rapejeet.
You will never be human, saar.
SAAR EXPLAIN ME
You really do have shit for brains, don't you?
Still the crime of assault and battery, you subhuman retard.
What do you do when you need to go to the toilet and some idiot is blocking the way?
Indians don't use toilets. The only possible reason he grabbed her and forced her in the bathroom was rape.
Then you must have a source that details
Exactly what crimes this man has been charged with under Singaporean law right?
Or are you just continuing to talk outta yer ass?
The actions described in the news reports in no way confirm sexual assault
Its merely speculation
The actions described in the news reports are circumstantial evidence sufficient to constitute proof of attempted rape.
A rapey pajeet grabbed a woman by the hips and forced her into a bathroom.
The actions described in the news reports are circumstantial evidence sufficient to constitute proof of attempted rape.
Thats according to you
Not according any provided transcripts or documents related directly to the case in question
Ranjesh, that's what shoulders are for
Putting your smelly brown hands on a woman's hips is no bueno
Stuffed into the crapper by a filthy streetshitter
he is a good boy from brahmin family very good
this is unfair, she was dalit or mleccha, please release him
he has good future, engineer, will earn more money than racist white cumskins
The source is my brain and my Juris Doctorate.
If you think I'm wrong, go to Singapore and grab a woman by the hips and force her in a bathroom. Let me know what happens next, saar.
What if there was not enough space en route to the toilet
Such that he could along side the Chink hostess enough to push her to the side with shoulders
And then move forward?
Not according any provided transcripts or documents related directly to the case in question
You haven't provided any transcripts or documents. You provided a link to a news report. That's what people have responded to, you dumbfuck jeet. If you want us to read the charging documents and transcripts, post them.
What if there was not enough space en route to the toilet
"Saar, I only grabbed that woman by the hips and forced her into a bathroom because there wasn't much space."
No I dont; clickbait articles usually don't spell out the charging section. I'm going by the nature of the offense, key word
molestation
aviationa2z.com
He also forced her into the airline toilet. Oooh, he is so done. Rajat can thank his ghee it wasn't construed as attempted rape. He's already unbelievably lucky.
ah HA, so you DONT know how he is charged
I don't know absolutely, since I haven't read the judgement. But I can predict with a high degree of accuracy going by past molestation cases that happen here. S. 354 is comprehensive.
What is your point in asking me this? If you think Rajat was not charged for molestation, which section do you think he was charged under?
And
I have only confined myself to statements and speculations based on these news reports
Whereas the Low IQs in this thread yourself included
Have made various statements without providing the source necessary to make such absurd claims
unfairly
nope. Stay home in your shithole country to be safe then.
not enough space
so I have to push her
Rajat is that you?
What if there was not enough space en route to the toilet
I dunno, maybe you could push her into a toilet and try to rape her for the crime of getting in the way of a brahmin or something. Who would even think of politely asking if you could get by?
he is a good boy from brahmin family very good
this is unfair, she was dalit or mleccha, please release him
he has good future, engineer, will earn more money than racist white cumskins
HE WUZ A GUD BOI HE DINDU NUFFIN
Well
Then if you are not sure of the facts
Why are you pointing to various parts of Singaporean law
When you dont have the necessary sourcing/documentation
Why not confine yourself to making statements based only on what is known?
My point is that there probably was not enough space to squeeze himself aide her
And then shoulder push her sideways or backwards
I'm only speculating based on known material from news reports
rape
Do you even know what rape is my man?
squeeze himself aide her
squeeze himself *ASIDE her
You posted a news article and asked about the legality of the actions described in the article. I gave you a correct answer. Now you're screeching that I haven't read the transcripts and charging documents that you didn't provide. That's not how this works. No one can answer a question for you based on information you haven't provided.
And yes, the news reports might be wrong. Maybe instead of pushing her in a bathroom, he pushed her out of the way of a deadly spider, or a space alien with a death ray, etc. In a different fact pattern, the answer is potentially different.
But you're obviously a 40 IQ subhuman Indian who can't understand any of this. Trying to explain it to you is like trying to teach multidimensional calculus to a slug.
Do you even know what rape is my man?
Rape: The only means by which microdicked hideous stinky pajeet men can have sex.
I agree with OP a three week sentence is a fucking outrage. It should be just a warning.
They should euthanize it with blunt force trauma and hang its corpse by the feet to serve as a warning for the rest of its kind.
legality of the actions described in the article. I gave you a correct answer.
No you did not
You provided general parts of law that may be applicable
You did not provide the specific part of Singaporean law applied in this particular event
With appropriate sources
Therein lies your failure
Every indian is a dalit to the rest of the world. You are a dalit, the rapejeet in the OP is a dalit, the CEO of Microsoft is a dalit. Do you understand, dalit?
You’re literally retarded and you should kill yourself
Fair. Maybe he really just had to take a shit and didn't want to fall into a stereotype
yes yes, come over and do what Rajat did. Come, come, it's perfectly safe for (YOU). I'm sure the police and judge will see things your way. Yes, yes, you are perfectly right. Come, come. It's not rape if you don't take out your dick, everyone knows that. It's not molest if you don't touch bob and vagene, that's common knowledge too. So come! Come and try! Nothing will happen to you.
If you want me to write a professional legal memorandum citing every single law, Singaporean or otherwise, that your shitskin pajeet rapist cousin violated, you have to pay me my customary fee of $400/hour. Want my Venmo?
The only way for a Pajeet to avoid hell is to kill itself before age 30 they understand this on an instinctual level and that’s why they love getting crushed by large machines.
If they succeed at this they reincarnate as a nigger which is the lowest form of human but as a human it’s a huge upgrade for the pajeet
Can't wait for safari on jeets to become legal.
Indians need to be segregated from the internet. Indian discourse should be relegated to deep web sites and away from regular search engines. It should be near impossible to interact with an Indian on the internet through normal use.
See, now this is daring attitude. Indians are the only race to take what they want, and damn the world for standing in the way. This way, we will colonize the stars. We are winners!
Based
saar pls let me tuch booty and vagene
very high iq saar madame
I had sex with a Singapore airlines stewardess once, my favorite airline.
The chinks should have caned the Indian it would be the appropriate way to treat their slaves
Gross you eat shit
rape jeets are worse than horny niggers.
He should have flown EVA Air instead. They will even wipe your ass for you.
cnn.com
After the flight attendant and two colleagues helped him into the lavatory, the man allegedly demanded she pull down his underwear, insisting that he was unable to do so because of surgery to his right hand.
Faced with threats that he would refuse to leave the lavatory, the flight attendant told reporters she had to prop up the man – four times her weight – from the front as a co-worker cleaned him.
Fun fact: EVA Airlines later fired the flight attendant for complaining about this. Now that's what I call customer service!
He then allegedly asked the cabin crew to help wipe his backside for him.
Good, rapists deserve to be castrated
for something that deserves no more than a warning
You think we should give every shit skin one free sexual assault?
If that's an accommodation you believe your race needs, then you're admitting we shouldn't let you in our countries in the first place.