Is this true? we used to debank people like frackers or gun store owners

is this true? we used to debank people like frackers or gun store owners
but now that it is affect us personally, it became a problem?

file.png - 576x736, 388.22K

banks must serve me

I don’t want to bake cakes for faggots

Pick one

With "you", they mean white right wingers and only them. They scream like banshee every time a nigger gets denied an account.

They are tribal to the core and they hate you. More than anything else in the universe.

sure ill just use cash instead
the faggot government can then check all my gay little purchases themselves

Become unbankable.

At this point if i was American i'd be agitating for the "Right to Hate and Discriminate against Sodomites and Niggers" to be added to the Constitution. Does what it says, the Right to Hate, and Discriminate against, Sodomites and Niggers may not be infringed. So you will be allowed to refuse to bake that cake and the bank won't be able to kick you out for exercising your constitutional rights.

if you don't have a right to a bank account in an increasingly cashless society, then no taxpayer dollars should go to assist banks in any capacity

Usury is against my religion. I only do business with Islamic banks, they also accept people of all religions.

Do you know that Jews don't even pay usury at these banks? They have Heter Iska, they give each other interest free loans by default.

Mortgages, business loans, auto loans. If you get a home loan from a zionist Jew bank you could pay over 2x the listing price just from compounded interest.

This is no conspiracy, go ahead and look up "Heter Iska" the entire financial system is built to favor Jews over non-Jews. It is a Jewish supremacist policy. Not just banks, but mortgage lending companies as well.

Muslims don't do this. Collecting or paying usury is against our religion. We have to lend money without interest. This is a way to afford a home in America.

images.png - 238x212, 11.78K

Because the government hasn't defended the sanctity of cash US dollars (not federal reserve notes or digital federal reserve notes) ("legal tender for all debts, public and private"), there is in fact an inherent right for people to have access to digital banking and therefore, bank accounts.

If a bank participates in the federal reserve system, they MUST provide banking services to EVERYONE AND ANYONE unless there's a court order revoking that right (5th amendment).

If banks don't want this imposition, then they should encourage the government to make merchants accept cash in all situations, including payment by mail.

Racism is against my religion, so is sodomy. You want to argue about wedding cakes they should be publicly hanged.

You are just a degenerate racist and want to conflate the two issues, but they are not the same. Racism is wrong and so is your racist language, punishing sodomites isn't about hating someone it's about obeying God.

yeah but usury is literally the only thing most people know how to do
people don't buy bitcoin because they believe in its usage as a currency, or in the great technological advantages of a blockchain, they just want to make money producing nothing

I dont think anyone asked

This
You do not have to have a bank, even a business doesnt have you have one

The IRS will audit you more, but that's their problem.

What you don't to use cash (fiat), you can use gold, silver, and buttcoins

you've never actually owned a business have you?
do tell me about your business that doesn't operate using a bank account

De charter banks world problems solved

job can't direct deposit because you're bankless

most refuse to pay cash

sorry goyim, guess we can't hire you

dollar valuation reaches closer to 0.01

No. Banking is essential for modern life, cake isnt. Kys, jew.

renounce citizenship and relocate

a bit of a hassle, but this would be the ultimate outcome

yeah that's most of the libertarian solutions to any problem: completely rearrange your entire life

Banks steal trillions of dollars from tax-payers
Banks exist outside of, and above, the law

oy vey goyim don't you believe in self-reliance?

yeah well but that's because they have actual power
you know, the type not backed by violence
if a large enough bank collapses, the entire economy collapses
and if the economy collapses, no amount of soldiers or fighter jets can help you

establishing personal autonomy and engaging in behavior that directly influences the course of your life is libertarian

Whats the alternative man

a more human solution to problems that takes into account that people have feelings and are not always 100% rational automatons

Easy: governments run their own banks paid for by the taxpayer. The government already controls cash, why not digital cash?
The only ones that would lose out on this would be the bankers.

im just saying dont hold your breath waiting on others to change man
cover your ass first

Only Jews have a right to bank.
Loxism is good for Jews.

Yep
Cash is the legal fiat. But kikes always over extend themselves. Always always always always. You even warn them genuinely and they'll do the opposite out of spite. God cursed Jews with being as stubborn as they are evil.

It's the same catch22 as I say about moderators and how websites have to be liable for content so people should fedpost more. Make Shitwoods asshole prolapse from all the extra work he gotta do and just sue Anon Babble jannies instead of accepting liability when your ass was being moderated.

Well all the same, if banks didn't want liability they should deal in cash not their systemic Judaism, but if they did that, they couldn't grift, be worth infinite money and propped up by the government.

I have a business. I get paid in cash.

Cool it with the antisemitism.

I am pretty sure Islamic banks are a scam. Unless the bank is full reserve, than its practicing usury somehow.

Nooo goyim you have to use a visa card if you wanna run a business

OP glows for the EU pedo ruling class. Normalizing Totalitarian Control is a psychological operation.

There is no greater crime a country can commit than having its own sovereign bank.

OP tongue the ball of globohomo totalitarian regime.
OP love blockchain overgoverment cum in his breakfast latte.

it should be a human right and it is in some european countries
where if you are a legal resident, you have a right to a simple near-free bank account, typically at the post office which operates bank service at the postal counter
this needs to be worldwide

postal.jpg - 797x790, 97.68K

it isn't a scam it works like leasing or 'rent to own' when you borrow money, you don't see an 'interest rate'
the technical idea is that it is profit sharing and the bank must 'risk' along with you, then the bank can 'earn' along with you
picrel the jew version
europeans have tried a secular version I think in Sweden

This wouldn't be a huge issue if it weren't for the fact that you now have a cashless society. Meaning literally everyone needs a fucking bank account to be paid or purchase goods.

No, you don't have a right to exist

I think in UK and the EU banks are obliged to provide basic banking accounts to everyone, even people with wrecked credit score and criminal record, these are basic debit cards.

Brings a smile to my face to see a bong say this lol, nature is healing

When ALL banks conspire to deprive you access to commerce, goods, services, and economic security, yeah... Big difference.

Denied a cake

Denied access to all food

Learn the difference

ok then prohibit women from having bank accounts?

Sorry but cakes aren't needed for everyday life, and you have no right to steal my money.
Don't want to end up like the United Healthcare CEO? Don't pull that shit

oh shut up arabs are very racist against non arabs

Journos are just like prostitutes

banks don't have any right to exist.

they are creations of Govt and Govt can call all shots on their conduct.

Govt can't SAY "you can't be a bank because you are Niggers" but AFAIK doling out a Corp by State Sec of State is a PRIVILEGE.

Just like the cops have no legal "duty to protect" or do jack shit.

But the way, its not YOUR money in your account. You GAVE the bank the money in exchange for having a fictional "account".

A bank bail-in is a financial mechanism where a struggling bank restructures its capital by converting debts owed to creditors and depositors into equity, allowing the bank to stabilize without relying on taxpayer funds. This approach contrasts with a bailout, where external parties, typically governments, provide financial support to prevent a bank's collapse.

Yeah, to prevent BANK's collapse by causing YOUR collapse. :)

So they can do the same thing again.

Without taxpayer "bail out" Warren Buffet would have neg net worth and be bankrupt. He is a terrible investor, just good at bribes.

Fuck them
I've been with the same bank for decades and they've let other people use thousands of my money.
I never took loans, lived responsibly, and they have the records to prove I can budget

When I needed a couple thousand for legal fees when my rights got violated, they told me to fuck off.
I now do not leave my money in the bank, it was supposed to be a 2 way relationship

a lot of places won't accept cash. I don't even know if you can pay taxes and bills with cash anymore. if that is the case then bank accounts are a necessity as there isn't an alternative.

The problem is that the goverment need to know your bank information, that way they got you by the balls, controlling everything you purchase or not, you can debank some people as punishment but over do it and you have a problem, thousands of dissenters angrier and harder to track

freezes your bank account for some arbitrary reason

move to crypto

wants to sanction your decentralized crypto

tries to charge you with money laundering for not using banking instead

tries to sue you for shilling before a dump

lol kikes

They charge an "operations fee" for lending you money.
No difference from fixed rate interest, usury with extra steps.

A less racist, less homophobic, and ethically and logically sound Amendment would be the right to associate freely. Does what you want it to do except it avoids naming one specific emotion or group of people you don't want to associate with.

Retard

Islamic banks are required to have 100% reserve IIRC

no difference

Huge difference, the Islamic Bank takes on almost all the risk in a "loan", since they have to actually buy the object of the loan at full price, without a usury loan themselves.

I don't care what you call yourself