Mission Impossible 8 acknowledges Israel has nukes

What consequences will Tom Cruise face?

hq720 (1).jpg - 686x386, 56.07K

None, because Nukes aren't real

You are stupid.

Where

The bigger deal is they have them pointed at Europe when Europe has none pointed at them... now that's something to think about what they think of us!

The Anti-white cult.

How

But enough about your bot script...

None.
Xenu tells Yeshua what is what…

How

What do you mean? Germans were guilt tripped into giving you the technology.

The jews have had nukes for a long time. It's called Russia.

nukes.jpg - 300x168, 8.82K

MOoom,Tom Cruise won't come out of the closet

Isn’t this common knowledge?
Israelis are vindictive hypocrites,

but Pakistan has nukes and threatens war after State Sponsored Terrorists kill civilians on Indian territory from India who genuinely always got caught flat-footed when China went for a power-grab because they are the only genuine mega-state that thought relying on good-will and state relations was a good strategy, and hasn’t fought anyone in any iteration of their history that much past India’s modern border, China was never Hindu and the Middle East was never Hindu.

Now China’s facing a two pronged war if they try to take Taiwan, and almost every country near them distrusts and fears them.

IMG_3177.jpg - 606x609, 86.73K

Nukes are real, they're just not practical. The Manhattan Project was real, the initial tests were real, the accidents like the one with the screwdriver were real, etc. But they were never actually dropped on Hiroshima or Nagasaki because the cost of producing them is laughably ridiculous for the actual amount of destructive power they produce. That's why they've never been deployed in a battlefield anytime after WW2. They're a psyop. They're not fake, but they're not practical weapons, either. It's much more cost-efficient to just use conventional explosive devices, like the MOAB that Trump dropped on Afghanistan in his first term.

It's like making a baseball bat out of precious metal. It would cost a fortune, be really impressive, but in the end would hit the ball basically the same way, if one could even have the strength to swing such a bat. In the end, it's just easier to use a wooden bat because it gets the job done for a LOT less time and money.

The fuck they are.

If they weren't real, nuclear power wouldn't be real, which it is. It's just that using energy from nuclear reactions is far more practical and efficient in reactors over time than trying to discharge all the energy at once in a war scenario.

the 7th one was slop dogshit - even tom cruise movies are shit now

Fission and A nuclear chain reaction are two diffrent things. Nukes are not real.

Fission and A nuclear chain reaction are two diffrent things.

Tell that to Chernobyl.

A chain reaction is a self-sustaining process where a reaction triggers further reactions, often involving neutrons splitting atoms in a nuclear fission process. A meltdown, in contrast, is the consequence of an uncontrolled chain reaction where the reactor core becomes extremely hot, leading to the melting of the fuel rods and releasing radioactive materials
Once again, not the same thing, nukes are not real

So you can create uncontrolled chain reactions that produce incredible destructive power and radiation emission, but not controlled ones? You're so smart.

Correct, not a hard concept. Nukes are not real.

>So you can create uncontrolled chain reactions that produce incredible destructive power and radiation emission, but not controlled ones?

Correct

If it weren't for your flag, I would think this was a troll. But because of your flag, huehuehuehuehue.

he's from brazil

jewish meme bombs

Lel!

radiation.webm - 1280x720, 2.02M

The final reckoning

It's his last movie anon, he has nothing to lose

Retired in brazil, Either way what I said is correct. Nukes are not real.

Fpbp

No, they assassinated JFK because he was blocking their nuclear aspirations and then they stole American nuclear intelligence and installed the pro-Israel LBJ. Israelis are parasitic rats.

This is a running gag. Israel doesn't have nukes. But they'd like you to think they do.

Nukes might be an expensive bomb but if you can destroy a whole city with one bomb you save enormous money on the equivalent amount of conventional explosives and the bombers to deliver them.

Now put that on a rocket that can't be intercepted and you have a super weapon that's cheaper than conventional forces. Don't @ me troll. I won't debate you.

Jfk was trying to issue silver certificates that would have undermined the federal reserve, that's why he was assainated. Nothing to due with nukes. Because nukes are not real.

They are trying to remind the world about Project Samson I think. It's a bluff though, their nuclear arsenal is probably similar in destructive mass to Pakistan. Even if it were significant it's not like God would let them launch it anyways, humanity has a funny way of narrowly avoiding events like these.

Nice what if, to bad they are not real. You should be more worried about drone swarms.

right now i'm more worried that pakistan will launch some at india, they'll fuck up somehow, and we'll end up with an even larger flood of indians going to the west

The real kicker is that they control nukes on US territory.

Both are real. And both "attack" the same people.

No argument the jews killed jfk, but nukes are not real. Elephant foot ≠ nuclear explosion

Real or not, every single government in the world acts as if they are real, and makes decisions based on them being real, so you might as well do the same if you want to be right every now and then.

By your logic we all Better get the vaxx and trust Epstein killed him self. Your argument is retarded.

He aint kiddin u r a retard

What will happen is Pakistan will launch some nukes. They will fail and explode over Pakistan.
They'll blame India for it and launch all the nukes they have. India will also launch all their nuke, also landing on India.

Nukes might be an expensive bomb but if you can destroy a whole city with one bomb you save enormous money on the equivalent amount of conventional explosives and the bombers to deliver them.

No, you don't. That's my point. The cost to develop and deploy them is astronomical even for one device versus conventional explosives that we've perfected in terms of efficiency.

Don't @ me troll. I won't debate you.

Tongue my anus, potatonigger.

Well, lads. Trips of truth. It's gonna happen in two weeks.

Checked, boy do I hope I'm wrong.