It is my honor to officially sign the 'Take It Down Act' into law...With the rise of AI image generation, countless women have been harassed with deep fakes and other explicit images distributed against their will...We're making it totally illegal.
Trump makes it illegal to create AI deepfake images of women
bans literally the only thing AI is good for
India's economy in shambles
Based Trump for protecting women
Oh noes
How is this not protected free expression
finally, legislation that doesn't help me in any way. I guess that's what happens when all the real problems are solved.
The courts will stop it. Just empty virtue signalling, same with the ban porn hype.
Supreme Court is christcucked
freedom party strikes again
Eh, I think it will stand. But it basically changes nothing. These are always anonymously created and distributed; good luck tracking any of it down unless you post it to one of your accounts. And you could already get nailed for doing that, so nothing changes.
Motel 6 in Benson, AZ still is an open air hub for truck-stop child trafficking, and I'm supposed to care about this.
i cant watch porn in florida legally without giving all my real ID info to a corpo contracted by the government, but conservatards wont show ID for their AR15 for their 14 year old school shooter child.
i cant watch porn in florida legally
How many have gotten arrested for illegal porn watching?
Don't worry burgers
We'll produce some bootleg artificial coomies for you up here in the north
idk, but all sites are blocked unless you show your real ID or use a VPN. Of course a paid vpn to a corpo.
Ban this, drumpfy.
If you can’t figure out how to get around that without an id or vpn you don’t deserve the porn.
No one should have to get around anything, you dumb faggot republican shittard bootlicking cuck. Now sing the national anthem about your love of freedom.
Isnt just for nonpublic figures? Thats the way its always been
my guns aren't
'Take It Down Act'
Should've called it shut it down act.
i hate you fucking traitors with a passion
Go suck some BLM dick. You’re just mad you can’t watch your tranny porn.
Im my that the party of "small government" is constantly banning things and controlling our lives in more ways every single day. You have NOTHING except hypocrisy.
There’s free porn all over the place and it’s not banned anywhere.
Ya it's not banned unless you show your real ID to a corporation contracted by the government. Youre not allowed to watch what you want in your own home. You'll force people to show ID to see the human body but wont show ID for your power fantasy guns you'll never use. (except maybe to protect tyranny.)
The gop has never been a conservative party and they have never downsized government in any significant way whatsoever. They are the party of lincoln
You have to show ID to buy a gun
Just like they have never been fiscally responsible and always spend more money than democrats.
Depends on the State, here in florida you can get plenty of guns legally without showing ID.
how many times are you going to make this thread flaggot?
This is unconstitutional and violates our free speech protections. How about you make it illegal to rent or sell homes or cars to illegal alien beaners instead?
Good
Libel is already illegal
nooooo I can just put celeb’s heads on porn stars
Go ahead…just don’t share it
Libel
i cant watch porn
Oh no! It must suck having higher testosterone, a higher IQ, and less social retardation.
unconstitutional
Technically it’s not
annnnnd nothing has changed
Sick fucks making AI pics of minors is what caused this. Coomers making AI porn is why you can't get a decent GPU for less than $700. AI as a technology has no business in the hands of normies or corporations.
Hopefully something god-awful happens and they're forced to outright ban the technology globally like methamphetamine was banned, for similar reasons. AI is the meth of technology.
the intimate visual depiction was obtained or created under circumstances in which the person knew or reasonably should have known the identifiable individual had a reasonable expectation of privacy;
This orange faggot and celebritites do not have a reasonable expectation for privacy, which is why fakes and cartoons have always been upheld. This is supposed to be for random people and revenge porn but, if the training data is taken fron faceberg or instagram or whatever do you really have an expectation of privacy? I dont think you do given that you agreed to their terms of service.
Oh and intelligence and law enforcement are exempt from posting deepfakes because of fucking course they are
magadrones are defending this and laughing at libs as cucks?
how did gaymergate lead us to this timeline?
The OnlyFans lobby succeeded.
that much effort to grab your girl by the pussy
Another reason to hate yoga pants
How about you make it illegal to rent or sell homes or cars to illegal alien beaners instead
Thats already a felony. Some spic will have to kill a politicians daughter before these shitheads actually enforce the law
Conservatards have always acted like cucks, they have always wanted to ban books, games, music, dungeons and fucking dragons, and all sorts of other shit. They just announced new school book bans in Florida today.
What about feet
Exactly. And for public figures, there has still been legal repercussions despite previous court rulings. So nothing changes.
this what about feet
Not naked, not illegal ha ha
Technically it’s not
Only if they only go after "malicious intent" like the law says. Otherwise it is a violation of freedom of expression.
Considering defaming someone is already a civil penalty then my guess is this law will get gutted pretty heavily when challenged.
Women and jews continuously go over every last thing we can ever enjoy with a fine toothed comb just to make sure it's all taken away from us. The fact that women have ever been created and ever existed is proof that we live in Hell. They are an absolute plague and a curse that cause me absolute misery and torture every second of my life.
Learn to draw.
best the court can do is everyone has synthetic likeness copyright this nonce is delusional
I dont like this because it gives power to mossad and CIA to push their own ai deceit under shroud of anarcho tyranny. Its safer for our societies to distrust what we see on screens entirely knowing pajeeto chang ari or john could have made it up.
Sure. You would just watermark it as a deep fake. Which most do anyway.
It's only libel if you suggest it's real.
No it doesn’t. There has been liable and slander laws before The Constitution and after. You use to be legally allowed to challenge people to duels for besmirching your character. Andrew Jackson had many of those duels. We don’t do that anymore but can be sued for putting out slanderous material on people. What Amber Heard did to Johnny Depp and if he got fired from several major movies. Even though he won the legal lawsuit he will never recoup loses and it will hang over him. There are a lot of stupid people that will pose obviously fake AI shit thinking it is real. More realistic it gets the more it will be even bigger problem
doesnt make sense, the CIa would want everyone making Ai porn to obfuscate the inevitable pedo politician tape one day. This is a revenge porn backdoor, porn or abortion, MAGA will have to deliver on one if they want Catholic money for 2028
Thats fine except intellligence and police are explicitly exempt in the bill, so this is obviously not being done in good faith
Unless they are going to spam sites they dont like with deepfakes and then throttle them with takedown requests
no, but I appreciate your effort. As it stands now, changing a persons face on a porno, isn't obscene, ergo, not illegal and protected free speech. Want it illegal? redefine obscenity. Dead in the water act
Also making dueling great again would solve soooo many problems
America is really really starting to suck
touche, viable route. I think the only thing stopping the feds from pulling the 08 Anon Babble play is it would be documented forever that FBI build a ** model. i cant even type it, but I see this as a backdoor to revenge porn. Otherwise, a celeb or politician certainly has no grounds to action a takedown. You can literally say whatever you want about celebs and politicians per the Supreme court, why would they outlaw putting JLaws face on a better naked body
There are a lot of stupid people that will pose obviously fake AI shit thinking it is real.
Tough shit, we don't determine the limits of our God-given rights based upon the incapacities of the least intelligent among us.
The way I see it; if visual and audio materials are untrustworthy then leverage by extortionary materials is worthless and also messaging is less monopolistic. Govt would not enjoy this because their authority wanes. Yes though if you were a pure cut the antennae off of everyone sort you might be more optimistic.
Actually it is illegal retard. One, you don’t own or have copyright over said porno. Two you are altering said porno or image. Third, you are using another image you do not have permission to use or copyright over. Try using some celb, disney character or whatever and sell it and see how that works out for you
you have presented a valuble retort my syrup nigger, and I am considering it heavily. It does make sense losing this sense of blackmail would warrant a fake white knight cause. Interesting to consider
Look up copyright laws, slander and liable laws and whole bunch others
copyright infringement assuming it was a used porn, but indulge me on a sora generated scene and a local LLM. Wouldnt need anything copyrighted, unless, say you give every single person inherit synthetic likeness rights. But not free speech? Incorrect, fully rendered in blender no copy right used (training models on copyrighted materials is yet to be settled) public available images, be it facebook or the news. I cant see how this isn't protected free speech if pornography itself is, now if all porn is illegal, well different story isn't it
conservatives just want to ban everything
God-given rights
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights
That means our rights are inherent and not granted to us by other men.
redpill yourself on pornorgraphy. Theres two counties in America that wont charge you for obscenity and only one county where porn was determined to be free speech. The better part of 45 states porn is banned. if you are making porn and not charged its bc your porn is vanilla and you are poor. But porn is Canada and Czech/Germans
probably the last flag to have this argument with my fellow countrymen. Also, Hamilton lost this argument like 250 years ago
This violates 1st amendment free speech rights.
Take. It. Down.
Will fail in court like all his shit
Should have been called the Taylor Swift act
buy a computer with a 16GB nVida GPU
download comfyui stable diffusion
download an uncucked version of reactor for faceswaping and inpainting
download a realistic pony diffusion model for static images
download Wan video for video
download various LORA's for both
now you can make as many deepfakes as you want.
And this is going to benefit AOC in 2028, Republicans are morons to help the Democrats like this.
But you do have to show an ID to buy a gun? I had to wait a week to pickup my AK as when I went in for the paperwork I realized I lost my driver's license and needed to get it replaced.
Only reason why AI images of movie characters etc and even memes aren’t illegal is they fall under the fair use clause. But that has limits. You can’t sell AI images of copyright shit. We are going to see a lot of lawsuits over this. You also won’t be able to claim fair use spamming or selling images of realistic AI pics of a celb getting gang banged
if you can't figure out how to buy guns even though it's illegal then you don't deserve guns
if you can't figure out how to not incriminate yourself when testifying then you don't deserve that right
if you can't figure out how to phrase your speech in a way that doesn't offend others then you don't deserve free speech
Thanks friend I actually have two GTX4080 gpus and I have been wanting to do this with Diana from the Hitman series.
yeah listen im just presenting the "you are here" part of the Ai likeness generation. Personally I think they go the route of everyone has a right to copyright their images from birth to death, 70 years after etc. Otherwise, grotesque free speech is permitted, only obscene isn't, we could argue for years if a fake gang bang picture is obscene
How is this any different from an artist drawing a picture of a woman?
You use to be legally allowed to challenge people to duels for besmirching your character. Andrew Jackson had many of those duels. We don’t do that anymore
We really need to bring it back.
Pornography is not going to be illegal and don’t be know why it’s brought up into this except as some weak stawman argument. Porn stars sign waivers to get paid to fuck on camera. If you went and posted videos fucking your girlfriend without her permission you can face criminal and civil charges. There was a case of this stupid bitch doing a selfie in gym locker room mocking bodies old naked old women. She posted them naked in the background without permission and got criminal charges
as of now, legally, nothing. Especially for a celeb or politician in America. Way I read it, would have to be framed as assult/revenge porn or copyright. If you go unprotected speech its DOA
There are a couple of LORA's for her on civitai
Anyone can do it and the results are better than what you would get with drawing.
But you do have to show an ID to buy a gun?
Depends on state and setting, you can go to a gunshow in florida or private seller and legally buy with no ID. But watch porn in your own home? Sorry the party of small government and freedom needs you to register your ID with their crony corporation.
you have a low level understanding of free speech. I am telling you, there is nothing illegal about putting anyone face on a gangbang, because it is not obscene. Unless you call all porn obscene. Ergo, you will be watching and seeing Ai porn of every single politician and celebrity, all legal. Nonsense to think this cant happen with publically available nude models and photos
You're giving the government an avenue to go after you in case they need to down the road. Say they raid or hack a VPN or porn site for facilitating "illegal" porn view, collect the logs, you're implicated. Do they act on it immediately? Probably not. Do they keep it in a file on you in case you start causing trouble for them and they need probably cause to investigate you, most definitely. If may never happen to you personally, but it might happen to somebody who's fighting for you.
Conservatives used to be a lot more redpilled about giving the government too much power. Now they can't lick enough boot.
I made deep fake of myself, wasn't porn though just turned myself into a roman goddess, was fun
There's no way this is real
Issue is not about obscenity and everything about using people’s likeness without permission and especially trying to pass it off that it’s real. If made an obvious cartoon pic of AOC fucking you could claim it’s satire
sounds good but the legally of the bill rests on the content provider, nothing illegal still about accessing xvideos in Florida. But you do have a point. Also America doesn't own the internet btw, the Ai porn is coming regardless
You don’t even known where free speech. Get out
its a compelling argument, one i say needs to legally say we all have copyright to our face and bodies inherently "god given rights" but until that happens I stand by my argument. Its protected free speech
wptv.com
Florida hasnt been able to access tons of sites this entire year and earlier in some other conservatarded states.
take your top down law
in the 90's people use to photoshop celebrities into porn, For random women this is kinda wrong but celebs I don't know also I think deepfakes is good you can always claim it is deep fakes if it's real porn
if not that then certainly falls under satire
surprised you arent using this avenue to redpill about the Czechs and their payment processor that enables eastern European human trafficking. You know the owners of the sites the FL/USA can not ban
Doesn’t matter what you use a copyright image for. If I sold mechanize of Disney characters or uses Disney images as my log for my business or whatever I would get my ass sued by Disney.
youre assumin we cant build a model with our own genetials and put a public copy right free model and tensors together to create Ai porn, copy right is moot bud, unless you're talking about the person's likeness in question
I dont give a nigger flying fuck about the Czechs. I care about my country that retard conservatives constantly try to make worse in every conceivable way.
HoMM on the CRT
Checked and New World Computing pilled
jewish babylonian money magik is a energy debt. The only way to be free of it is repaying or ideally never engaging. By not paying, you propagate the Babylonian money magik further
Honestly the first thing i have seen him do where i just dont get it
the language of the bill is atrocias
the purposes of the bill completly misses the bigger picture
the writing ethos and implementation is complete shambles
the preported positive effect is different to the bills intention
its litterly bad for AI companies and creator's
it will unironically give other countries a competative advantage in future domain's
i do not get it
"just save the celebrities"
who advised him on this what has happend here.
people will be fired for this
You’re defeating your argument because you’re saying you’re altering the image so much it’s not an obvious image of the celb or whoever. That happens all the time with copyright. Musicians sue all the time that someone ripped their song off. But it has to be a blatant rip off to usually win
Bottom line is AI is going to be a legal nightmare for a very long time. Trump’s executive order like all his other ones will be challenged in courts. He knows it and why he did it
Dude it's honestly easier and more fun (and legal) to harass women with their legitimate nudes that they've sent you. Western women will send you nudes in a heartbeat because they're spiritually Jewish and lacking of morals. After they give these to you, you have every right to send them to their father, their brother, their future dating prospects. And it's all legal and very fun :)
why did they not just bad profit and leave the rest to defomation... that is all they had to do
Ban profit from the immages
defomation already covers everything else
how does AI porn even harm a persons charicter by just existing
anybody claiming it is real is a case closed defomation suit
when we talk about fraudulent identities
make an amedment to identity theft extend it to digital identities
anybody claiming to be x person & AI is used as an enhancment
do we have chilldren running the planet what the fuck has gone on here.
instead we have
litterly every AI company has to amend the model's
surely nothing could go wrong while the other countries just go all gas no breaks
thousands of gooner retard's who would play around with stupid ai porn they can make as a gateway into the industry just gone ect
this will be a complete disastor
we are all conflating corporation and IP and politicians and celebs. The later has no protections for libel, slander or anything in America. Fair use is for a lawyer to answer your questions on your statement. I don't know its so convoluted on what you can and can not do here, none of its settled
Not surprised the jeets are seething about this.
kek wait untill the federal goverment is sueing people on behalf of celebrities.
It really is and why it will be tied up in courts for the foreseeable future. If you use a tech company AI generator like Microsoft they won’t let you make celb AI imagines but can make movie character ones like Darth Vader or Harris Ford looking Indiana Jones because that falls under fair use
I already knew you were a jeet you didn't have to confirm it
jeets are not affected by your law iddiot
india is fine with deepfakes
im going to bump this thread so people understand you think american law applies in india... pro tip it dosent.
That’s what it’s going to likely end up as. But it’s such a gray area because more realistic AI gets more your argument of fair use goes out the window. Again if you make a cartoon looking celb having sex its obviously a cartoon and you can claim it’s satire. But if its super realistic and you’re passing it off like is real is entirely different thing. Again courts will have to figure that out
AI deepfake
Then back to the photoshop.
again if it says AI in the title at best they can argue defomation why is the goverment paying for defomation cases.
and if you are clearly impersonating somebody thats identity theft.
Why did Elon specifically make Grok the mainstream AI that can do deepfakes right before Trump bans it
I think it's funny that the only good piece of policy Trump has signed so far and everyone already hates it
you can't watch your porn legally because child porn is illegal florida man stop bitching
are taylor swift Ai's the exception tho?
we just have to hope that the courts actually throw this one out i seen trump do some questionable thing's but for the good of the nation this one needs to not happen
i get it porn is bad defomation is bad ect
but the consequences of the bill will have zero intended effect and is completely misplaced in everyway
for the reccord i actually dont give a fuck if deepfakes stopped existing today if somebody said hey i can wave a magic wand and they will all disapear i would be like go for it why not
Exactly. IE, what if Kim K becomes a politician in the not so distant future and thus decrees that anyone who has viewed, posted, owned, etc any bit of her overedited sex tape will be prosecuted?
The courts will stop it
Just like they stopped affirmative action after almost a hundred years?
(In case you didn't notice, affirmative action is still law of the land. They switched to talking about DEI instead while you were distracted.)
The bill got bipartisan support which is almost unheard of today. Take it Down bill passed the House 409-2 vote last month and will likely pass the senate with no problem.
So this is an illegal image now?
Ai porn of REAL women
What an absolute waste of technology
kek it should be that amount of makeup is criminal
this actually raises an interesting point rofl if they dont actually look like that is it even their likeness.
̶S̶h̶u̶t̶ Take it down
As a man I would be honored if some nerd girls made hot ai generated photos of me
what Zootopia 2 should have been
Would you be ok with realistic AI photos of you sucking another man’s dick and getting gaped?
i would not want to get my knob slobbed by that
the garbage disposal would give better odds of coming out better
you know this act includes authentic, non-consensual content as well, right? even if she sent you nudes and doesn't even say you can't share it, if you do, she can take you to court because she changed her mind. any judge will side with her when her crocodile tears start flowing and you will pay the price as a sex offender registered for life plus a 2 year prison sentence on top of that. everybody in here better delete all their Fappening photos off their clouds right now. that's all i have to say
Simping gone wild
kek he would just take legal action like a normal person in poland it would not even be thrown out he would win
that same case in california wouldnt even make it to trail
You all assume deep fakes will just get hot women. That faggots won’t be making deep fakes of straight guys doing perverted degenerate gay shit.
While men's penises can be mutilated and parts be cut off from them.
Some equality you got there!
What about Photoshop you dumb niggerfaggot
US is a matriarchal state no doubt
I don't see a law that covers this. It was her decision to photograph herself naked, creating a digital trail, and disseminating it through the internet or phone. If the photograph she created of her own volition that gets further disseminated, then it's her fault for ever creating it in the first place. If the photographs were stolen, it's a completely different story.
you assume this will do litterly anything to stop deepfakes it will make india an extra trillion over the next 5 year's
Someone should post a AI deep fake of his wife on the truth social post
Larp unless proof
I personally I prefer herbivores
Who cares about India. If this bans deep fakes and especially fake movie trailers from jeetland that’s a win
That invalidates every AI generated image because they are all trained on publicly available images.
are you trying to summon kiwis?
Oh good more stealth censorship
No it doesn’t. Again, if you use microsoft or and big tech AI generator it will not let you make AI images of celbs or actual people. You can make movie characters because that falls under fair use. So I can’t make a William Shatner AI but I can make a Captain Kirk one
why would it ban that i dont understand
why do you think it would ban that?
it would ban it from america and if vuewing it is illegal it just means all the american hosted sites ect have to find and take it all down
I mean I can't really provide proof that I've sent chick's nudes to other people in the past... Don't exactly keep records of my dastardly deeds. Just kinda do it and forget about it, ignore the backlash. It's fun. Just recently had a freshly 18yo jewess send me nudes and masto vids. Waiting a little on those to send to her next boyfriend and maybe figure out how to get them distributed on her campus when she goes off to college.
Not censorship. Always been copyright laws and slander laws. Why this bill just passed the House almost unanimously which is unheard of
youtube short's uses AI editing software do you have any idea how large the grey area would be
litterly hundreds of thousands of americans have broke the law overnight without even meaning to
is a deepfake just porn? the bill does not specify that.
he just made like 50million american teens felon's
it's not censorship. It actually a win.
we live in a simp / feminist society, sir. the only women who don't get away with such things now are pedophile female teachers, unironically. the only reason johnny depp won his lawsuit was because he hired a female masterclass attorney to defend him, a qt one too, i might add
Let us know how your “muh freedom of speech” works in court
Who cares?
Fuck off shill
LMAO YESSSSSSSSS HAHAHAHAHA
Bill just requires these platforms to have to take it down if someone reports it as fake image of them
Take it Down Act was veto proof so Trump has no reason to fight a veto proof bill that had 409 yeas and 2 Nays. OP would rather Trump veto the bill only to suffer embarrassment from his veto being overridden by Congress days later.
so then its completly ineffective... good news.
A bill that makes millions of people potential felon's but is openly not acted on.
Youtube can’t claim ignorance on this. They faced the same thing when they first were created. Many people thought Youtube would get sued out of existence when it first started and allowe copyright videos, movies, clips on their platform
Brown shit covered hands typed this
This is a kike
you're fucking DONE for
You have been outed as a shill so your further points carry no weight
youtube has basically imunity to laws like this
"reasonable action to remove the content"
10 year's later litterly billions of hours of the banned content on the platform
zero legal consequence
It's going to be interesting see how "identifiable" shakes out in court. Picrel was inspired by an actual photo, but the photo itself was not used as a digital input.
The actual definition:
(5) Intimate visual depiction
The term "intimate visual depiction"-
(A) means a visual depiction, as that term is defined in section 2256(5) of title 18, that depicts-
(i) the uncovered genitals, pubic area, anus, or post-pubescent female nipple of an identifiable individual; or
Yes, that does mean pre-pubescent female nipples are okay, at least from a letter of the law perspective.
(ii) the display or transfer of bodily sexual fluids-
Presumably doesn't include saliva.
(I) on to any part of the body of an identifiable individual;
(II) from the body of an identifiable individual; or
(III) an identifiable individual engaging in sexually explicit conduct
What have you done?
Hopefully a war is coming.
I can't wait to start killing you stupid maga faggots.
I’m a shill for stating facts and law and your subhuman hairy jeet ass can’t handle it
No chance. Courts are controlled by the orange turd and there's too much interest from celebs..
Actually no. Youtube use have full movies , posted illegal PPV fights, etc. All that shit has been pulled. Only thing have now is short clips which fall under fair use act and material studios allow on the platform. Reason why Google bought it. Youtube not even same as it originally was. Basically like how Netflix changed to mostly its own content
They should call it the SIMP act. I’m sure there is an acronym there.
Courts are controlled by the orange turd
Is this bait or are you just an idiot bong. Trump got more injunctions and lawsuits going on than any president ever! Idiot. Add on he had nothing to do with this bill. It literally just passed the House almost unanimously
harry jeet ass
If these types of thoughts occupy your mind then I truly feel sorry for you
That was something both Biden and Trump agreed on during their 2016 campaigns.
as if this fucker can do shit about it
The law is not so much anti-coomer as it is preventing women from catfighting. You absolutely know teenage girls will be generating true-to-life deepfakes of classmates to destroy their reputation when they can.
I still can’t believe it cleared the House with only 2 votes against it. When was the last time that ever happened
Trump had nothing to do with this bill.
Yet he will abuse the fuck out of it, so its basically his.
Ah, so that explains why the site with him has the mascot got shut down
"I have a micropenis"
I foresee serious problems with the following section:
“(B) INVOLVING MINORS.—Except as provided in subparagraph (C), it shall be unlawful for any person, in interstate or foreign commerce, to use an interactive computer service to knowingly publish an intimate visual depiction of an identifiable individual who is a minor with intent to—
“(i) abuse, humiliate, harass, or degrade the minor; or
“(ii) arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person.
the sexual desire of any person.
of any person.
any
Does Congress realize they just made the posting of babies in diapers illegal? Because there's a whole community of sick fucks who get their jollies off that.
And no, if they meant "any reasonable person" they would have written that. FFS there was a time in this nation's history where people got off on strong calves. Are you going to ban children's shoe commercials?
pee-pubescent female nipples are okay
That's because they're not sexual you degenerate
kek anon the next time a ppv fight happens youtube it.
youtube anyfilm you want to watch rn.
its all still there
i had to stand up and do exactly that to my girlfriend, i couldn't help it
So trap deep fakes are still on the table.
Its slander, you are making someone look like a slut and it is an attack on their character. They should have the right to sue for defamation of character. I don't want to vote for someone with big juicy honkers when they don't really have them irl. There is more than one victim here. This has to stop.
literally the first fucking thought my god even google AI said they shag em until the kikes had to SHUT IT DOWN
two years ago?
Annnnnd a federal judge has just put a moratorium on the law ruling it unconstitutional
can't somebody stop him?!!
Holy kek
If deepfakes are illegal, using face filters should also be illegal.
Hell, it would be twice as illegal since a bunch of mid e-thots are making a career of marketing shit in social media when their whole persona are fake filters.
It should count as false advertising.
Source?
I said no such thing, simp lord. I've done this to other chicks because they're whores who send nudes. All they can do is cry and yell at you "how dare you". They created it, they distributed it. It is the property of the ether and the internet after they decide to create it.
Goddamn dude, you're trying to protect women you don't even know.
It will recover they will go back to scamming grandmas
Annnnnd a federal judge has just put a moratorium on the law ruling it unconstitutional
Trump judges hate the constitution so I hope a patriot judge gets to rule it unconstitutional.
i seriously hope Trump signs a "COMMON SENSE FOR ATTORNEYS ACT" because all this money-hungry, namby-pamby suing, if anything, has gotten way out of hand youtu.be
how did gaymergate lead us to this timeline?
gamergate created the angriest feminists known to man. those feminists, alongside grifters, started calling men who disagree with feminism "incels" and began to equate not being a submissive feminist with being "incel." while this might appear incompatible with conservatism, because it is, the "cuckservative" moniker was born as the maga men went out of their way to "protect the women." (see the post a few posts above yours about wanting AI to be banned to protect women and children [which is redundant because women are children, hence age of consent makes no sense]).
because cuckservatives want to "protect" women so badly, to prove they aren't incels, they are willing to march to the feminist drumbeat even more than some liberal self-hating men. these cuckservatives say shit like "women are smarter than men; hey, men do that too!; sure most women can't do that, but some women can do that!"; men are lazy and need to get off the porn and video games and work!; just go get a woman bro, or are you a fag who can't get laid (an incel) and other shit that allows the camel's nose of feminism under the tent.
modern american cuckservatism is led by pantsuit wearing feminists cheering on women's history month (that's not a joke). the only reason cuckservatives went after trannies is because trannies were hilariously encroaching on girlbosses' sports and showing women to be inferior to men. the point of girl's sports is self-esteem. everything is about their self-esteem. everything.
why can't trump just follow the constitution instead.
you get three years in prison for that now because MAGA is all about personal liberty and freedom
Jesus christ, the obsession with protecting women from literally everything.
Because it’s against whores.
publishing* deepfake porn is illegal.
publishing* digital forgeries (deepfakes you thought were real pictures, porn or not) is illegal.
punishment is fine or max 2 years. 3 years if its a minor. if you threatened to post, same punishment but minus 6 months.
the way they define digital forgeries is... interesting. could technically include a really good oil painting. might make for some weird interpretation in the future.
its not illegal to threaten to post digital forgeries, but they did include a punishment for it, meaning thats just an oversight.
its completely legal to make deepfakes or digital forgeries though. and its completely legal to email them. just not post on the internet.
websites have 1 year to post a notice that deepfakes are illegal, and to make a system where you can report deepfakes of yourself to be removed.
so, you cant threaten to post deepfake tay on reddit. but you CAN threaten to send deepfake tay to modmail, and do it. perfectly legal.
there are a few edge cases and exceptions, but i dont feel like typing anymore
because the constitution hasn't strictly been followed since its inception. to say it isn't flawed and dated, is ridiculous
"I have a micropenis"
Not naked
could be considered a digital forgery, and "what is depicted is not a matter of public concern", so illegal. grandmas on facebook will report retards to the fbi for ai slop trump memes because theyll think its real.
ill throw you a bone and give you one fun exception: if you made tays pussy a "matter of public concern" somehow, you could legally publish deepfakes of her pussy.
You are absolutely retarded if you believe your no ID claim.
“(B) INVOLVING MINORS.—Except as provided in subparagraph (C), it shall be unlawful for any person, in interstate or foreign commerce, to use an interactive computer service to knowingly publish a digital forgery of an identifiable individual who is a minor with intent to—
“(i) abuse, humiliate, harass, or degrade the minor; or
“(ii) arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person.
“(C) EXCEPTIONS.—Subparagraphs (A) and (B) shall not apply to—
“(i) a lawfully authorized investigative, protective, or intelligence activity of—
“(I) a law enforcement agency of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision of a State; or
“(II) an intelligence agency of the United States;
Glownigger CP is officially legalized. LMAO. Explain to me for what purpose the glownigger industrial complex would disseminate glownigger CP
Does Congress realize they just made the posting of babies in diapers illegal
no, because that's not an "intimate visual depiction". and if it was, its only illegal if the "person ... use(s) a ... computer ... to knowingly publish an intimate visual depiction of an identifiable individual who is a minor WITH INTENT TO ... arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person".
if you didn't intend for your baby's diaper pic to be construed in that way, or naked picture of them in the bathtub even just posting it on facebook to be cute, then its legal.
The term "intimate visual depiction"-
(A) means a visual depiction, as that term is defined in section 2256(5) of title 18, that depicts-
(i) the uncovered genitals, pubic area, anus, or post-pubescent female nipple of an identifiable individual; or
(ii) the display or transfer of bodily sexual fluids-
(I) on to any part of the body of an identifiable individual;
(II) from the body of an identifiable individual; or
(III) an identifiable individual engaging in sexually explicit conduct and 1
(B) includes any visual depictions described in subparagraph (A) produced while the identifiable individual was in a public place only if the individual did not-
(i) voluntarily display the content depicted; or
(ii) consent to the sexual conduct depicted.
glowniggers legally can generate glownigger cp to plant on bad goys or produce in reference to bad goys to frame them for shit that didn't happen, legally speaking
It's real and not AI. My source is I don't care
youre talking about CP and you missed the weirdest part of the exceptions? youre a nigger, anon.
“(C) EXCEPTIONS.—Subparagraphs (A) and (B) shall not apply to
“(v) the publication of an intimate visual depiction that constitutes—
“(I) child pornography (as that term is defined in section 2256 of title 18, United States Code); or
“(II) a visual depiction described in subsection (a) or (b) of section 1466A of title 18, United States Code (relating to obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children).
is that a digital forgery i see? idk man, i think my mom might think thats real.
The things is "revenge porn" is already illegal at the state level, but it shouldn't be. White women deserve to have their lives ruined.
they were already allowed to do it with real stuff for years. you know honeypots exist. were on Anon Babble. are you surprised they extend it to ai now too?
better delete your gawr gura porn faggots
Bruh, unless you're posting pics with accompanying captions "check out these FILTHY feet pics" then the only thing the prosecutor is going to prove intent from is the content itself.
They will do this through association.
"Ladies and gentlemen of the jury. I direct your intention to the discord server #FootFagFurries. While the accused may not have posted here, he had to be aware of the impact his toddler pedicure advertisements would have on the furry footfag community."
How is this not protected free expression
The next dumb fucking Yank that mention the holy 1st amendment is gonna get shot in his fat fucking shabbos snout!
Muh Constitution!
Muh 1st Amendment!
Muh 2nd Amendment!
Deluded to the fucking bone to live in a free society, this isn't just ridiculous and funny anymore. JUST STOP IT.
A country when prostitution is illegal but actually filming the illegal act makes it legal because muh 1st Amendment and shit.
A country where a troop of nigger Australopithecus triple penetrating a little white girl who just turned 18 is "protected speech" but actually saying the holy of the Yank holies the magical N-word is de-facto a hate-crime that brings trumped up charged to no end.
Fuck you guys, we are in this mess because of your delusions.
BTE we Euros are even worse, we are the slaves of you dumb Yanks who are the slaves of the Jews, we Euros are the lowest of the low, like... a dog owned by a nigger slave in the antebellum South.
Fuck hope, and fuck your holy Constitution.
Felony
They will do this through association.
you always need a good lawyer. im just an anon interpreting the bill as written.
also, filthy feet pics aren't an intimate visual depiction. read the whole definition the gov uses as an "intimate visual depiction" i posted above.
post all the filthy feet pic deepfakes you want (just no genitals or body sex fluids) - but not digital forgeries.
reddit spacing
i wondered why all the explicit lolicon threads disappeared recently on Anon Babble then i saw this video LMAO. to say lolicon isn't a ruse or a gateway to abusing real kids, i say neck yourself, bud youtu.be
Not just women they are protecting. You know how many people think DeSantis saying he eats pudding with his fingers is real? Got a media that continues to lie about Trump saying Nazis where fine people and called vets suckers and losers. imagine more sophisticated deep fake propaganda. That’s what’s scaring these politics and likely it passed almost unanimously
My nai subscription ends in a few hours
Only got it since my pc broke and its phone friendly
Would it even hold up if challenged in court? I think I already know the answer.
Another great day to be a Libertarian who didn't contribute to any of this bootlicking shit
Make this happen, I want America to become a luddite nation who end up cutting themselves off the Internet.
libertarians in america are just embarrassed trump retards, who all vote for Trump btw
presidents dont make laws you fucking retards why do you line up to suck this guys dick so hard when he so much as sneezes
can it even be challenged after being signed into law? I thought it had to be challenged before that
A country when prostitution is illegal but actually filming the illegal act makes it legal because muh 1st Amendment and shit.
yeah what's up with that
reddit spacing
I am glad you implicitly agree with everything I said and your only complain is about my formatting (BTW you have reddit-spacing ass-backward too, check image).
libertarians in america are just embarrassed trump retards
most of us take a strong stance against jizzrael.
rights invented by "deists" (proto-atheists) and atheists
not based on anything divinely revealed
God-given
you heretics are hilarious
hawk tuah spacing
we Euros are the lowest of the low, like... a dog owned by a nigger slave in the antebellum South.
Kek
True. You at least lost a war for it. We didn't.
Anyway, Amerimutts are retarded, they deeply want to consider their country NUMBA ONE! for some unexplained reason, the rest is just peanuts for them.
And now they live in Brazil and are on their way to be living in South Africa.
Dumb, dumb, dumb fucking mutts.
What kind of simp would ban generative AI because of roasties ?
Prostitution is legal in Nevada
OP and most the people replying are butthurt jeets. This was a bipartisan act that passed the house nearly unanimously and likely will pass the senate unopposed. Almost unheard of in todays political climate
The video that shook the Middle East
Read nigger, it's already illegal.
en.wikipedia.org
I already trained LORAs on any girl I find hot, so now I can just chill forever.
I don't even need to go online anymore.
Sorry chuds no refunds trump is going to protect women and censor the internet to do so.
Trump? Almost every Democrat in Congress approved the bill.
If it was slander or defamation to create AI content then this new law would be pointless because we already have laws creating those protections. These laws also have a higher standard for public figures because of the priority given to freeze peach.
Trump signed this bill, its his.
This degree of political support probably means people will be uneager to challenge it, however this could happen. Someone could be charged under that law, appeal because the law infringes on their rights in their particular case and it could go up to the Supreme Court and they could agree which would btfo the law.
Correction, bill already passed the senate unanimously and just passed the House with only two opposing votes. Yup, courts can’t do shit
The rights were not invented by the Founding Fathers, they were recognized by them. Your IQ is too low to understand the difference.
illegal
Yeah, good luck. Can't even fucking stop piracy.
This degree of political support probably means people will be uneager to challenge
You aren’t American, you have no idea what is going on. Cali lefties shut down a juvenile sex trafficking bill They don’t give a fuck about optics
Based
Simp culture
The courts will stop it
Lmao
I am banning the ability to paint women naked. The First amendment is now over and illegal
Yeah good luck with that.
After this little bit of theater, Jamal with his friends went back to his place and had a gay orgy together.
Bill has nothing to do with pornography jeet. You just can’t make goomer videos using celeries images no more. Back to fucking chickens
Sick fucks making AI pics of minors is what caused this
Disgusting!
People are doing this!
You have any links
Because it infringes on women's unalienable right to profit from selling their body as outlined in the constitution.
Oh yeah, missed the reference to intimate visual depiction in the minors section.
So I guess topless AI pics of pre-pubescent girls are A-OK. Good job, Congress!
So many angry jeets
This was a bipartisan act that passed the house nearly unanimously and likely will pass the senate unopposed. Almost unheard of in todays political climate
simp culture
You can't paint the likeness of somebody naked
First amendment. Illegal law. Eat a dick.
>A country when prostitution is illegal but actually filming the illegal act makes it legal because muh 1st Amendment and shit.
yeah what's up with that
And you are asking a Euro about YOUR country history???
Luckily for you I have a Phd in Yank Historiography:
Religious fanatics got kicked out from Europe, like Jews from Spain 100 years before, and jetted off to New England to found America’s first theocrat squad, the so-called Puritans are the true founding Fathers of America.
Those prude colonizers set up shop in Massachusetts banning any sinful deviation and chucking out anyone who dared think differently.
Fast-forward to 1873: horny Victorians shoved the Comstock Act through Congress, outlawing the mailing of any obscene crap.
In 1910, moral busybodies panicked over "white slavery" and rammed the White-Slave Traffic Act (Mann Act) into law, making it a felony to transport a woman for "immoral purposes", say what you want about pre-modern Yanks but at least they knew miscegenation with niggers would have destroyed their young nation, now the Jew has brainwashed their retarded grandchildren into EMBRAICING it.
Stanley v. Georgia (1969) told cops to bugger off if you’re watching porn behind closed doors, private possession is kosher, but live whoring stays criminal conduct. The Juden lawyers used the same excuse they used for legalizing faggotry & abortion: so-called PRIVACY, that is, injecting HIV+/STDs semen into the rectum of other men creating never-ending epidemics is a HUMAN RIGHT like killing your unborn child, but paying for a massage to your penis is a felony.
TL;DR Pornography was in the hands of the Jews that's why it got legalized, prostitution was in the hands of Southern Italian/Sicilian Mafiosi too dumb to bribe US politicians like the Juden.
And that's how you end up with legal pornography but illegal prostitution in the land of the free.
Poor women.
Maybe he should grab them by the pussy to make them feel better.
>lives with parents at 38
shirt says "DICK THE BIRTHDAY BOY"
"I have lolicon"
"It's all drawn, none of it is real"
V& for ai pizza
Somehow I know there are a lot of anons like him defending AIporn on Anon Babble.
This is so blackmail of politicians and celebrities doesn't become discredited and people don't automatically assume any "leverage" released on disobedient politicians,celebrities,etc is fake.
Unironically making the default opinion of normies that anything embarrassing/illegal leaked is fake will hurt the powers that actually control the system.
Guys, I'm tired of winning.
Total simp death
Only women? So I guess stuff like this is okay?
lots of you anons are ballsy posting those ai webms when it was literally made illegal
Concern trolling snake^
Post more everyone, the government and the snakes in government don't want their blackmail files being ruined. Post ai deepfakes(politicians and intelligence officials especially) everywhere if able.
does this mean all of my AOC deepfakes are now illegal?
why are you watching porn instead of inseminating a fertile womb?
You don’t know what the First Amendment is. Get out jeet
Trump doesn’t follow the law so you don’t have to either.
you can't get a decent GPU for less than $700
I was the biggest most obnoxious freetard linux user for 20 years but I looked at the price of good video cards and bought an m4 mac mini for 475 zogs instead. Not wasting another minute of my time configuring and farting around and kludging, ive got actual professional work to do now.
Its nuh first amendment right to use and sell material I don’t have permission to use. Nooo, Disney can’t sue me for using their stuff. Noooooo!
Nobody gives a shit about you losers or anyone on here. You’re not important. This is for major platforms
Why do retards like you still believe that we have free speech? People have gotten convicted for insulting eachother. US Courts don’t recognize then constitution or free speech.
You’re retarded and don’t use VPNs that don’t keep logs? Not my problem
Shadow ban if you want, i'm just going to post on sites you don't monitor/control. Enjoy the stress slaves of satan :)
Trademark infringement is not the same thing as satirical use of a likeness
Damn they banned me for posting my precious Tay Tay aí.epic pictures.
Anon Babblehas fallen down
Kids are expensive and the world sucks. Have a gf. Still like watching porn you freedom hating grandma larper.
Deep fakes are not satire and made to look like they are real. That is the entire point of them. Even without the law you will never win in court of law that it falls under fair use
Show me where people went to jail over insults. Liar.
Kys kike.
U goin to jail now nigga
You’ll never see a jewdge do this ever for a constitutional right
It will ve once you admit in court it's a fake video.
Interesting take but I think that everyone knows that anonymous dissemination is a thing. I doubt people would see some leaked Epstein video and think it's AI just because there isn't a law on the books banning that if there minds weren't set on it being AI in the first place.
enjoy alcatraz you sick fuck