Just so I understand correctly, the Bible goes like this:

Just so I understand correctly, the Bible goes like this:

The god of the Jews creates 2 Jews who are the ancestors of all Jews

Then he destroys the Jews but saves his favorite Jew from a flood

Tells a Jew to create more Jews and to create a nation that will consist solely of Jews, who will be his chosen Jews

Tells another Jew to lead 3 million Jews (which there are no records of) out of Egypt

Tells the Jews to quit worshipping other Jew gods and to only worship him, the REAL Jew god

Then centuries later:

Another Jew claims to be the savior of the Jews and a bunch of other Jews get mad at that Jew

Romans kill said Jew for claiming to be the King of the Jews

then for 2,000 years both Jew-descended groups take turns calling themselves the REAL Jews and that the others are the fake Jews

So...what does this have to do with white people?

You literally dont understand the Bible and should just kys instead of spreading antichrist propaganda

Moses wrote the Torah and he wasn't Jewish. He wasn't from Judah, nor did he practice the Talmud traditions, which is not the Torah, it's interpretations about it and what Jesus explicitly condemned them for.

Believe it or not, but there is not a single verse in the entire Bible that specifically calls the Jews or the tribe of Judah God’s chosen people. This misconception comes from the fact that the Jews of today have declared themselves to be Israel and not the house of Judah, as the Scriptures rightfully call them.

youtube.com/watch?v=eT_RUdBTlp40hxmp

million Jews (which there are no records of) out of Egypt

Jews didn't fucking exist yet you retard, not until 2 Kings.
You think Hebrew = Jew = Israelite.
This is part of why you'll burn in hell

You literally dont understand the Bible

He does though that’s exactly what happens in the Bible

The old testaments has like 18 authors all Jewish rabbi and the New Testament was written by rabbi Saul the pharisee who was also a Jewish rabbi

Every single word in the Bible both old and New Testament was written by a racially and religiously Jewish rabbi

You post this image trying to shit on God and think anybody will take you seriously? Are wrongdoers that dumb?

The answer is the number of Shekels you got for making this nonsense 1PBTID post.
back2plebbit pls, dont forget fedora and katana.

This is part of why you'll burn in hell

YOU DONT UNDERSTAND MY HEAD CANNON ABOUT JEWISH MYTHOLOGY

That’s why you LL BURNNNNNN FOREVER AFTER YOU DIEE REEEEEEEEE

why are christcucks like this?

Immmm What does this has to do with politics?

Truth

Luke, the author of Acts and Luke (and possibly Hebrews but that’s debatable) was a gentile

Elagabalus was also Magrebi not Roman

There’s 0 proof the gospels weren’t also written by Saint Paul

1. Proof doesn’t exist in history, don’t be stupid
2. Every single source for the authorship of Luke and Acts attributes them to Luke, including the early church and the texts themselves (which are addressed to one of Luke’s friends)
3. There’s zero evidence (not proof, EVIDENCE) that Paul wrote them either
4. There’s zero proof that Paul isn’t the only person to have ever written anything ever, because proof doesn’t exist in history

The gospels were written anonymously.
Moses didn't write the Torah. Its debated whether or not he actually existed at all.

christian identity larpers believe in the serpent seed doctrine.
Which says that eve was actually impregnated by the serpent (shape shifted to a jew/nigger) which resulted in cain.
Then, the serpent abandoned cain and adam became the dad that stepped up (cuck) for eve and her mixed race son.
lmao

eve.jpg - 1280x720, 375.51K

Jews didn't even exist prior to the flood.

Luke didn't write shit. He was an illiterate peasant from rural Palestine at at a time when only 3% of that population was literate. There's no was the apostles wrote anything or even dictated them to scribes, there were too few of them. Most of the New testament is falsely attributed to famous authors because no one would read them otherwise.

So...what does this have to do with white people?

That first book was written using Greek mythology and Plato's ideas among many other myths from non judaen sources. picrel. It is Hellenistic thinking mixed with jewish poison.
Think of it like rock and roll. The British Invasion was bong bands feeding rock and roll back to white, american kids.
Jesus is just a jew flavored mystery religion savior god. Completely Hellenistic.
What does it have to do with white people? Jews are going to steal your culture and feed ot back to you attached to their shit.

the serpent seed doctrine.

eve was actually impregnated by the s

Literally none of that is in the Bible. wtf.
Btw, is this you van by chance?

The gospels are as anonymous as Harry Potter, which is to say that we have numerous copies with the authors name on the front from antiquity (Matthew doesn’t have a single copy missing a name) and the early church unanimously agreed on the authors. You may think that the writers weren’t real, but they aren’t anonymous

3. There’s zero evidence (not proof, EVIDENCE) that Paul wrote them either

Statistical analysis the same method used to catch criminals by their writing style

Plus Saul was inventing a religion it makes a lot more sense for him to do all that, sock puppet accounts, Saint Paul created Christianity not Jesus

Luke was a doctor according to church tradition. Very much not an illiterate peasant

Just so I understand correctly, the Bible goes like this

You don't understand correctly. The image you posted indicates you are approaching the discussion disingenuously.
I will not elaborate further.
Christ is King and has clothed Himself with majesty.
ICXC NIKA

My mistake, luke wasn't an Apostle. But there's no evidence he actually wrote it at all. That doesn't stop the bible from being a book written by Jews and about Jews though.

The judaen priests who wrote that stuff used Plato's Tamaeus which describes how to construct a nation. It IS politics at its core.

he perfectly summed it up
you are practicing jewish fairytales and worshipping jewish idols

luke copied the majority of it from Mark. Mark stole it from Marcion. Marcion was a wealthy merchant from Sinope and more than likely judaen.

Paul died in 64/5 AD, historians estimate Luke’s Gospel to have been written around 80AD. That would make it difficult for Paul to write it, unless you hold to an early authorship theory. Even then, both church tradition and historians agree that Johns gospel was written around 90AD, which would make Paul writing it quite difficult.
I haven’t heard your statistical analysis point before, and the gospels do all have quite distinct styles (for example Matthew contains Aramaic idoms not present in any other NT work) but I’ll have to do further research before making a judgement

christian identity larpers believe in the serpent seed doctrine.

closeup
Meds pls, btw

So...what does this have to do with white people?

Christianity was founded by priests of Mithra, neither Jesus nor Pedro created said religion

file.png - 1232x746, 2.22M

Funny thing is many of the Judaens of the time of the supposed jesus were Hellenized and took Hellenistic versions of their names. Like the supposed Saul of Tarsus took on the name Paul. It is known that Joshua/Jesuses would take the name Jason. Our lord and savior Jason Christ... Christ being a Greek word, too

Statistical analysis the same method used to catch criminals by their writing style

The analysis started with the Dutch Radical school in the late 1800s. Since then it has been shown over and over so many times that there are many many authors of the so called Paul's Epistles. The existence of Paul himself has long been questioned.

historians estimate Luke’s Gospel to have been written around 80AD.

Mmmh what dating method? I don’t care that much either way, no cult has ever been made up of honest people

A lot of cults at their beginning are well studied, Islam, many American cults, the Japanese poison gas attack cult, the Chinese guy who said he was Jesus 2 the sequel

In all cases, every single cult we know, both the cult leader and the inner circle lie their asses off constantly to try to add credibility to the cult and its beliefs, I have no reason to believe early Christianity was any different

There is no source of the life of Jesus or any of the events or the New Testament happening outside Christian texts, zilch, and the Bible says Jesus did things like raising an army of zombies or making bread rain, which are DEFINITELY things people would have talked about and remembered it they had happened

Another thing to consider: the church constantly added made up and threw away cannon and books, in the early days.

The Dead Sea scrolls have tons of books of the Bible that were removed by the church. A bit later the book of revelation was declared non cannon by the church because I believe it said the end times would happen within 1 century and... yeah the date had passed a bit

So the cult leaders didn’t believe it, they just made shit up as they went and discarded anything that was too inconvenient, the point being that even it it wasn’t Saul, it was another inner circle cult member who from all historical examples, we can expect to have about as much integrity as him. That’s my line of thinking.

OP is mad because he got BTFO in another attempted shill thread a few minutes ago.

koran is worse only good for burning

islam4.jpg - 1000x10000, 2.28M

that there are many many authors of the so called Paul's Epistles. The existence of Paul himself has long been questioned.

Interesting but doubtful, cults usually are started by a cult leader or a tight nit community of collaborators

It’s never some spontaneous grassroots movement that becomes a cult, Buddha existed, Mohammed existed, Shoko Asahara existed, Hong Xiuquan existed, Joseph Smith

So I find it hard to believe that Paul/Saul didn’t exist, there are records of him he didn’t write (when he went to Greece to preach, the Greeks mentioned a weird man came, they didn’t really understand what he was saying, and that "I think he must be advocating for the worship of foreign gods"), and Paul clearly has that central role in Christianity (Jesus had 12 followers according to Christian cannon, meanwhile Paul wrote the fucking bible itself + created Christianity with thousands of followers)

So basing my opinion on this off historical examples (=how these things usually go) and statistical inference I would say it would be at least very unusual if Saint Paul was a made up figure, so I believe he did exist
He was a high ranking rabbi skilled in the arts of psychological manipulation, who either came to believe in Jesus’s cause if Jesus did exist (as he claimed, his story is that he fought against Christians then saw the light and converted), either that or he saw it as a good opportunity to create a vassal religion to Judaism for the gentiles, since Judaism is a racial religion, you can’t convert, but if you create a different sect of Judaism aimed at non Jews, then you can get them in on your system

Also many Jews believe they are the absolute moral authority by default and that all non Jews are evil and immoral by virtue of not being Jewish, if Saul had these beliefs too it could explain why he was trying to make gentiles more jewish, following this logic, a gentile who follows the Torah would be more moral.

christgolem shill

Your e-larp doesn't actually exist IRL, retard.

gcpz.jpg - 1024x731, 166.77K

Current scholarship on the Koran shows it followed a similar path... a judaen offshoot that got morphed by the subculture that adopted it. Mohammed is fake just like Jesus and Moses.