What's the point of a ban on smoking outside kindergartens and similar when only police and security guards have the right to remove offenders and there is no penalty for the offense? What are they going to do? Call 911?
What's the point of a ban on smoking outside kindergartens and similar when only police and security guards have the...
why would you want to smoke around kids you snownigger bastard
/thread
I must have missed when I became the topic.
why would you want to smoke around kids
how else are they going to know how to look cool when they grow up?
You must have missed when Britain invented the internet and gave your kind this technology to make a thread in English. Fuck off out my thread cunt.
Almost every law requires the citizens to uphold it without it being enforced.
By your logic can I use meth and cocaine around your children?
when Britain invented the internet
fallen empires frequently revert to such claims. India invented all of civilization.That's you now.
Do you mean people not breaking the law, or do you mean people punishing those who break it? Because our law says only police and security guards have a right to remove the offender of the smoking ban.
Bring back smoking in public spaces. America would lose a ton of weight.
it is objectively true that obesity is worse for one's health than smoking. If smoking promotes weight loss then it should be encouraged for public health reasons. Anyone disagreeing is an ideologue.
First of all, socialized people, who are also white or asian, will follow laws.
Second of all, things can be socially enforced: "Why are you smoking here you fucking retard?"
This will take care of most undesirable behavior.
You're literally like a nigger going to a self-checkout and saying to himself "WOAH LOOK AT ALL THIS FREE SHIET THEY DON'T EVEN CHECK IF YOUS PAID".
I heard there used to be that thing called high trust society or something like that where people didn't do shit cause it was wrong not cause of the repercussions for doing it. All these signs are probably relics of that era.
This is wrong.
The company started selling opium to Chinese merchants in the 1770s in exchange for goods like porcelain and tea,[64] causing a series of opioid addiction outbreaks across China in 1820.[65] The ruling Qing dynasty outlawed the opium trade in 1796 and 1800,[66] but British merchants continued illegally nonetheless.
literal fact cunt google it
Can you read?
Yeah, can you? You said white people will follow laws. I disproved your statement.
I said socialized people, who are also white or asian, will follow laws.
Sorry, you said socialized people, who are also white or asian, will follow laws. I disproved your statement.
why do mfers like you have to push everything
Busybodying is very effective at pissing people off
Carries a $2,500 fine around here and triggers automatic trespass meaning if you don't instantly leave it's time to visit the jail.
This will take care of MOST undesirable behavior.
So yes, people will break the law.
Again, if you're socialized, white or asian, and you do social enforcement, you will take care of MOST undesirable behavior.
the "internet" is best credited to TCP/IP which was invented by two Americans. The WWW was just a re-do of Gopher (Also American)
The point is
a) Fine you for stupid reasons to extract resources out of you
b) It's a humiliation ritual to show you who's boss, kinda like when they arrest you for fucking prostitutes. Feudal countries simply love to show the serfs that they are still serfs and many serfs also take pride in how obedient they are.
c) Nicotine is an appetite suppressant. Smokers hurt the medical business by either dying too fast or not dying at all and not suffering for prolonged periods of time. (Note that the oldest recorded woman smoked for like 90 years).
d) Nicotine is poison to intestinal parasites and that's like gay genocide pretty much.
e) The serfs must also get their Two Minutes of Hate. Since "hate" is considered "bad" by the Thought and Feelings police, but normies by nature are mostly hateful creatures, they are allowed by the government to spill all that on some carefully selected groups. For example, smokers are allowed as an outlet for hate by default in feudal countries. Before that it was antivaxxers, after that it was Russians.
It literally cannot be true because I invented the internet. check mate
You're incapable of the most basic intellectual discourse if you can't hold a hypothetical idea in your mind and make a distinction between topic and presenter of topic. You're in good company though, that's 90+% on this board.
You're a literal sophist though.
I guess that's why you never download movies. I mean it's illegal and you're white so automatically you don't do it even if there is no enforcement.
go back to your hotel, Mr. Gore, you're drunk
Smokers either die very fast or not at all. Both kill the medikikes and the pharmakikes, you cannot extract resources for therapies from either group.
Fat fucks generally suffer longer and it's profitable to both sell them goyslop and drugs to alleviate their suffering as a result of eating that goyslop.
TCP/IP? Memes? Encryption? I've done all that shit yeah. I invented the word "unscrupulous" as well.
faggy .gay user
Can you tell me why most people follow laws? Is it because of the fear of punishment? Is it because it's actually impossible not to follow a law, for example not paying taxes for your salary? (Since the employer has already paid your taxes)
i respond to wrong person
ur the faggy .gay user
Because breaking the laws has penalties.
Okay, so it's because of fear of punishment, is that correct? I'll try to be an adult about it now.
But now the question becomes: when something is uncalled for or seen as strange in the society you live in, why do people avoid doing it?
For example, tipping is not illegal in Japan, but people generally prefer not to do it.
Why do most people follow that convention, even though it's not written into law?
The topic is about a law with no penalty for breaking it. From what I understand the business owners etc are fined if they don't put up signs or whatever but the smoker is not punished for smoking. Most places don't have security guards or at least any that can arrive within 2 minutes.
Why don’t more people ignore the non-smoking law, given that it's not enforced with punishment?
People ignore it a lot wherever there are no security guards.