ITT: describe your political wordview in one to three words

My land, no modern capitalism, no state no taxes.

Don't like 'em

death to enemies

Capitalist Transhuman Agnosticism

Anything for Ireland

Staslinism

Clown pussy. Honk!

I should rule

not my problem

Might makes right.

Front toward enemy.

race war now

Based fellow zero'ed-dubs.

Pride

whatever she wants

Capitalist Transhuman Agnosticism

Anon chose almost all endings on all Deus Ex games at the same time.

Peace, freedom? Based!

Babies Need Diapers

I've never played them, but I am serious...

revenue, recital, ritual

NIMBY

They are Anon Babble-approved, even Invisible War. You will really like them, they explore all those topics.
And you have a pretty interesting position, usually transhumanism goes either into solarpunk post-work stuff or cyberpunk dystopia, which might describe your views.
I wish I could see a post-scarcity solarpunk but right after the communists have been ground up and used as fertiliser, a new age for humanity marching on its path towards the stars.

Progressive evolutionary perfectionism

ius volo e Deus

Based. No communists allowed.

"might makes right"

loses

lmao

nhh

Anarchy
and fuck your 3 word rule.

Blood, fire, steel.

الله أكبر

youtube.com/watch?v=vp7xoPeWzEw
This is what an outcome of your view might be, made with AI which is pretty fitting given the topic. Post-scarcity yet visibly non-communist non-automation cyberpunk stuff.

"Fuck your rule!"

abides by it

lol

Not my problem

Canadian

Shut the fuck up jeet. Go eat out of the shitter. It's all you're good for.

You lost

If you get a paper cut in jeetstan, do you immediately get tetanus?

They develop super-aids.

Attrition

Demographics

Preserving Western Civilization

Hear hear

describe your political wordview in one to three words

Christ is King.

anti communist fascist

nothing ever happens

Flamin Hot Cheetos

Free video games

Fuck India

peepee poopoo niggerkike

Strength through adversity

'ick on 'eck

White Protestant ISIS

TOTAL KIKE DEATH

Ethnonationalistic Sharia Law
oh wow look, it's a redditor
hehe

Fpbp

Communism Will Win

Nuke India

stability and ultilitarianism

could also be "stability above all"

Italy
GioScotti
Fascism

Battle ain't over untill the white race is gone, try again jewboi

one to three words

Blood and soil.

White

Natural

Homogeneous

It was 1 to 3 and you followed it like the duck you are

gas
the
kikes

Ignorance is Strength
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery

Hang all politicians.

kill all niggerfaggots (it's one word)

czech'd. baste quads of Christ

Father to son

Festina Lente
Niggar

Social cycle theory (Anacyclosis).

The theory of anacyclosis (ἀνακύκλωσις in Greek) represents the culmination of ancient Greek political thought on the evolution of political communities. It is a “unified theory” of political history in that it attempts to explain the evolution and dissolution of all regime types, including democracy. The theory is most clearly and succinctly expressed in the writings of the historian Polybius, though many aspects of the theory were described by earlier thinkers such as Plato and Aristotle. Recognized by Machiavelli for its explanatory power, Polybius’ model was studied by the Founding Fathers of the United States and profoundly influenced their vision of the republic they were founding

The word anacyclosis has been variously translated as “the cycle of political revolution” and “the cycle of the constitutions.” In short, the theory states that the six regime archetypes that the Greeks identified and which we still use today (monarchy, tyranny, aristocracy, oligarchy, democracy, and ochlocracy or mob-rule) each represent different stages of one long process of political evolution. There is good reason to think that Polybius and his predecessors arrived at this theory empirically. After observing the rise and fall of many hundreds of city-states, most of which cycled through several of the governmental forms mentioned above, Greek political thinkers concluded that these transitions from one form to another were not random. Rather, they seemed to follow simple and recognizable patterns. For example, tyrants were frequently overthrown by groups of aristocrats, while popular revolutions frequently overthrew oligarchies and ushered in democratic rule. Interestingly, the reverse of these trends (aristocracies being overthrown by tyrants or democracies turning into oligarchies) were statistically less likely to occur

meta-constructivism, drive-driven, deterministic

What else morons?

Thread

Through such observations, Polybius extrapolated the likely complete course of political evolution for an independent state whose lifecycle is not cut short by war or disaster. According to our interpretation of his model, the cycle proceeds as follows. Political communities are first ruled by kings. Kingship is eventually corrupted into tyranny. The last tyrant is deposed or forced to share power with an aristocracy. Aristocracy degenerates into an oppressive oligarchy. Occasionally, an independent middle economic stratum – a middle class – emerges; hoi mesoi in Aristotelian terms. If this middle class is entrenched, democracy emerges. In time, however, a plutocracy emerges, stratifying society between opulent and dependent. The hopes of the dependent masses fuel an intensifying competition among their political patrons, transforming democracy into mob-rule, perhaps better described as rule by demagogues. This tournament of demagogues rages among a narrowing field of popular leaders until a single champion arises victorious, dragging political society back to some form of monarchy, thus completing the cycle

Plato describes his cycle of governments in his work Republic, Book VIII and IX. He distinguishes five forms of government: aristocracy, timocracy, oligarchy, democracy, and tyranny, and writes that governments devolve respectively in this order from aristocracy into tyranny. Plato's cycle of governments is linked with his anthropology of the rulers that come with each form of government

Marxists call this "Historical Materialism" (not to be confused with Dialectical Materialism which is the class conflict).

Communists, who are more influenced by Marxism-Leninism (Lenin's view of Marx), add a stage between Socialism and Anarchism (Communism IRL) called "Vanguardism". Basically, Lenin thought that since society was hostile towards Marxism, that the best way to implement it is for a group of workers with a good understanding of Marxist theory to seize control of the government as the vanguard party and reorder society. This is what leads to the Communist complaint about "state capitalism" not being real communism. In a communist society, the workers are supposed to own the means of production, while in a country controlled by a vanguard party, the government owns it. The party is supposed to move the country further into "true" Communism, but they usually devolve into a bunch of corrupt bureaucrats.

Freedom for Whites

Race War, NOW

checkd

Shut up Poo

witnessed

Rape all women

Based

Worldwide White Rule

SLAVERY

checked and kekd

fully automated communism

destroy all y*nkees

Apocalypse inbound.

Death to Israel

this isn't working

aesthetic catholic accelerationism

Scape the archons.