You schizophrenic retards have unironically cured my racism and antisemitism

Yeah, and my pattern recognition told me that the majority of racists and antisemites are a bunch of offputting freaks. Losers, incels, wackjobs, and the like.

You should also stop breathing since everyone you don't like is doing it

cisgendered

trips of truth

Cope.

Stfu rabbi schmecklestein you shekel seeking apartheid racist gaslighting Zionist Genocidaire. STFU.
Now, would you care for a bagel?
Toasted & dbl Toasted?

/pol anons see you shlomo...
Everybody KNOWS.
m.youtube.com/watch?v=Gxd23UVID7k&pp=ygUdbGVvbmFyZCBjb2hlbiBldmVyeWJvZHkga25vd3M=

Pure unfiltered autism.

Shlomo's got no game.

Nobody cares. Herbed.

le pepe cringe.jp

Not buying it kike.
Kill yourself.

Hello, fellow racists. I too have changed my worldview.

Post axe wound or NOSE

I know, and Yes OP is a massive btfo faggotass apartheid gaslighting Zionist Genocidaire racists

Herbed

Here's a nice song by a Jewish guy
I'm not just gonna kvetch and turn it off now because of his ethnic background
youtu.be/pvQMyVoefNI?

Yet you said you wouldn't walk in the hood at night. Leftists would still call you a racist Chud, you are no better than anyone here.

cisgendered

gave yourself away, troon

I'm not basing my entire fucking worldview on

your worldview is entirely based on hating white men and destroying the white nuclear family

What's your favorite bagel? I bet everything... you imbecile fools are suppose to have a superior intellect...ROFLMFAO
You're as easy to read as children's books.
.
Will that be toasted with butter rabbi??

still thinks the far left controls the entire narrative when Trump just won the popular vote

There are plenty of people whose racism ends there who have successful lives and aren't a bunch of NEET losers.

/pol anons see you shlomo...
Everybody KNOWS.
m.youtube.com/watch?v=Gxd23UVID7k&pp=ygUdbGVvbmFyZCBjb2hlbiBldmVyeWJvZHkga25vd3M=

hello fellow cisgendered heterosexual white males

tfw casual racist and not obsessed racist

Anon Babble is nothing but autists and cringe lords.
youtube.com/watch?v=gnXBeQwmmrc

I'm not basing my entire fucking worldview on hating them.

So who do you hate now instead?

See you tomorrow, nigger.

marxists and abrahamists

based and same

What if I gave you $10 to be racist. What then, tough guy

that's great news, now you can go back to Anon Babblepolitics and stop making slide threads out of your blog posts, faggot.

local man discovers neo nazis are anti social tools for Zionism barely a step above trannies in their stupidity and emotional dysregulation

You can oppose mass immigration, harming Palestinians etc without being a total mong. I do it every day.

gaslighting jew with reddit spacing

I was a Nazi just like you but you're such a meanie

Cry more nigger loving jew.

same
i also considered myself a christian until i came here and realised christians are fucking insane

reddit spacing

this wasn't a thing until it was introduced as a meme in 2010. muh reddit spacing complaint is the number one indicator of a newfag. second is muh summer complaint.

Notice how you have to resort to century-old pics to show any kind of aesthetic display of sane, eugenic people associated with your beliefs.

My favourite prayer is

Dear Lord

I love you but please protect me from your followers

And what do commies show? China?

But why should it end there? Yes the hood at night is an imminent thread of harm/death to yourself, due to niggers. But if niggers are that bad that being alone with them at night is dangerous, then it is reasonable to assume that niggers will adversely impact other areas of society they are present in, such as school, workplaces, stores, etc. if you force yourself to shut off your brains recognition if this fact you are a total NPC drone. Pattern recognition will always lead to total racism, given enough exposure. Whites with pattern recognition ALL know a 100% white society would be, and was previously, amazing to live in and some of us base our politics around this fact, because the founding basis of America was it was a nation for Whites of good moral character.

Can confirm. I was a local/regional admin for a pro-white group for a couple years. The amount of insane cringelord shit I had to both a) filter out entirely and b) put up with so as to at least recruit some people would blow your mind.

Really does change your view of white people and "the race" entirely. The big majority of white people aren't really worth much. They're stupid, lay, and worst of all, cowardly. Even amongst white activists, the amount of sperging and generalized antisocial behavior was hard to put up with. People wanting to form rape gangs because women shouldn't be allowed to say no to smelly dudes. People abusing drugs (and getting caught for it after they abuse their girlfriend).

And thats just the people that got through our screening process, which we pretty much had to after filtering out all the obvious insane people, people with serious anger issues, and people just wanting to start fights with other members, which were easily around 50-60% of total applicants.

Don't get me wrong, I did make 3-5 good friends with quality people. They exist. They're more personal friends now. But "da moobment" is a fucking joke and needs to die and be reborn into something else.

Notice how jews like you and your monkey nigger pets have to censor sane, eugenic people associated with my beliefs. Notice also how your kind has turned entire white nations into dysgenic Weimerian trash.

They're a bunch of retarded losers too. I didn't suggest otherwise.
I know that winning the lottery would be amazing too.
You're coping now.

everyone is retarded regardless of their political beliefs bro

is this the new narrative to try to sway people of nationalism?
Cringe
desu people with your type of thinking are the most stupid ones....legit retarded...

heil hitler 4 ever

It may be different in other countries but you can't have these views in America and be a nationalist. You essentially have to be utterly anti-America, opposed to your own people and everything they stand for. In which case, unless you're planning on defecting to Europe, you're effectively just a self-hating loser with nothing.

saw how stupid

Not an argument.
What is cis gendered? I dont think thats even a word.

Not an argument.

If your "movement" only attracts the worst kinds of people then there's something wrong with it. End of story.

What is cis gendered? I dont think thats even a word.

It means no kind of tranny / nonbinary / or other kind of modern gender faggotry.

no kind of tranny

Doesnt that imply that americans are trannies / nonbinary by default? Why not just say male? Arent normal males the majority? Its confusing to me.

something wrong with it

Yeah its a white nationalist movement in an anglokike diaspora fag country that worships israel and jews. Of course its retarded and cringe.

Rules of Reading Hegel:

Rule 1: Never (ever) actually read anything by Hegel. First of all, of course, you cannot just come out and say you never read Hegel. No one reads Hegel, but no one ever admits to not having read Hegel. It’s a sacred law of (not) reading Hegel. In fact, you cannot ever say you are reading Hegel when you are reading Hegel for the first time (if you have committed this atrocious act, see Rule 2), you are always re-reading Hegel. Here is how you do it:

I have been re-reading Hegel’s Jena Lectures recently. Some fascinating stuff, really helps you understand [insert more known works by Hegel], don’t you think?

When you send things back to other pretending Hegelians, you are projecting confidence in your ability to fake having read Hegel. Don’t be afraid to use this move – they haven’t read Hegel either so they are not likely to come back with an objection to your interpretation.
Second of all, be sure to buy Phenomenology of Spirit and Science of Logic. Open them at about 10-20 page intervals, glance at a page here and there, underline a few sentences, insert an occasional “Hmm…” and “Bullshit!” comment in the margins, close the book and never open it again. Make sure the spine is sufficiently broken (and get only paperback editions) in case anyone grabs the book off your shelf. If you are brave enough, actually tear the spine of your paperback and have the book in a kind of torn-up state on your desk for a while. Insert various notes into it, make bookmarks using post-it notes, spill some coffee in an obscure part of Logic (don’t go for Master-Slave dialectics, everyone non-reads that part). Needless to say, a broken paperback communicates a clear message: I read this book so many times, it fell apart.

Quick tip: If you bought a volume or two of Hegel in German, never open it or take it off your shelf. No one actually pretends to read Hegel in German. If you try to pretend to have read Hegel in German, everyone will see through your game. Only do that if you are a Hegel scholar of significant status, otherwise you will appear to have taken the “faking your way through Hegel” game too far.

Rule 2: If you do make a mistake of reading something by Hegel, use my personal technique of “carefully phrased selective emphasis” on certain aspects of Hegel. So you made a mistake and started reading Hegel. This is not good. Why? Because you might actually begin to think that you can and should read more Hegel. Nothing could be more counter-productive for faking your way through Hegel. It will only lead you to more reading of Hegel, to self-doubt (“Do I really understand this correctly? Shouldn’t I read more before making claims about Hegel in general?”) and ultimately to your untimely demise as a future Hegelian. Here is what you do – whatever it is you managed to read (most likely introductory sections of Phenomenology or Logic), take it and make into the crux of your interpretation of Hegel. In fact, since you have already made the mistake of having decided to read Hegel, be adventurous, read some really obscure section of the well-known book and claim that this is, in your humble opinion, the key to understanding the entirety of Hegel’s philosophy. If you don’t see how this works, you are an idiot and you must stop reading this post immediately. For the rest of you, obviously, this is how you fake it in the big league. When you say that passage X is the key passage, you clearly communicate to others that you have read the entirety of Hegel, again and again, and, having done so with sufficient effort, you concluded that this and not some other passage is the key passage.

Quick tip: The more grandiose your claim, the better. You can even push it further and make statements like this: “We don’t need more Hegel today, we need more Plato!” This is big league faking. It quite clearly states: 1) I read all of Hegel, 2) I read all of Plato, 3) I grasped the very essence of our time and discerned that it needs Plato and not Hegel.

Rule 3: Read only tertiary literature. This is a no-brainer. Only real losers read secondary literature. Read literature that refers to literature about Hegel. But, and here comes the useful bit, if you choose to use any of the tertiary literature for your own paper/book/presentation, follow their quote to the original Hegel’s passage (be sure not to read any of the context, it is dangerous – see Rule 1) and under no circumstances actually mention this tertiary source. Remember, if it is a citation, it’s not plagiarism. The advantage of tertiary literature is clear: those who choose to cite secondary literature in preference to actually citing the primary source are already compromised and are already under the general suspicion of faking, so taking ideas from them is simply expropriating from the expropriators (as Lenin aptly put it). When you fake with the fakers, everyone wins!

Rule 4: Remember, no one actually speaks Hegelian language, so you only have to learn to translate things into it, but never from it. Any good philosophical conversation must use the lingo – people who try to explain complex philosophical points in the common tongue of the great unwashed masses are an abomination to the profession and to the human race. If you could explain Hegel in simple accessible language, then the entire inexplicably turgid pile of steaming secondary lit about Hegel is shown to be fake. Remember, no faker likes to be revealed as a faker – that is one button you do not want to push. Luckily, unlike real languages, in Hegelian language you only need to learn to put things into it, and never to translate things out of it. Most of it is nonsense to you and your friends anyway, but, again, you mustn’t do it ironically. Learn it just like you learn any other language: start with good vocabulary building exercises (“absolute” – “concrete” – “spirit” – “sense-perception” – “sublation” and so on), add some verbs and adjectives, learn some phrases and you are ready. Because it is ultimately a made-up language, only a few truly master it to the point of actually saying something – you are quite safe to use it in almost any circumstance.
Quick tip: the more boldly you state things in Hegelian language, the less there is a chance you will be discovered. So take it to the next level, write a paper for a Hegelian conference, be confident, use it all the time, especially during the Q&A session. There is no other way to learn a language, even a fake one.

Rule 5: Always claim to have already overcome Hegel. This is the easiest rule to follow. No one reads Hegel for the sake of reading Hegel – no one fakes to have read Hegel for the sake of creating an illusion of having read Hegel for the sake of having read Hegel. All of this is done for a simple purpose: to create your own peculiar philosophical position on the basis of your having overcome Hegel. Hegel is in the way of any real philosophical achievement. You can never claim that your particular philosophical system is the next best thing until you show how it falls outside of the already predicted historical development of philosophy by Hegel. The man ruined it for every ambitious youngster who can’t wait to create his own ontology – he must be overcome! But be not afraid, if you follow all the previous rules, you will not ever actually have to overcome anything – you will, however, have the sufficient “experience” of Hegel to claim to have overcome him.

And that’s all you need. These should get you on your way!

based enlightened frogposter

Now imagine what it's like living in a country that is from top to bottom nothing but Anon Babble's talking points spewed by retards so low IQ they make the average crow look Einsteinian in intelligence.
That's Estonia for you. A white version of India where everyone's a low IQ impulsive and retarded psychopathic Jeet who happens to know how to shit inside.
Ironically, the most bright and obviously intelligent people where - from all the people I've met, from Russian teen to Estonian uni teachers - different shades of brown and from Myanmar, Bangladesh, Punjab, Ghana. I still don't know what to make of it when the white people in Estonia, shilled as the most intelligent in Europe, fail to match the intelligence of browns and black.
Wish I were kidding.
Schizophrenia is also pattern recognition, but glitched out.