Why are Kikes so obsessed with social engineering?

Because social engineering is how they killed Christ
Captcha: TKD

Btw The story of the Fall is about the Establishment of Civilization. Once, we were Hunter-Gatherers. They lived in a direct relationship with God in the Garden. That is, they lived precisely as God intended Human Beings to live.

Adam & Eve = Hunter-gatherers (in the Garden).

Expulsion from the Garden = Development of Agriculture. See Genesis 3:17 onwards:

You shall not eat from [the tree]

In toil you will eat of [the ground] All the days of your life.

Both thorns and thistles it shall grow for you

And you will eat the plants of the field

You will eat bread

Cain vs Abel = herder vs grower, AKA two forms of Agriculture. This is an age-old conflict, because Goats etc. will eat young plants, ruining the Harvest.

The story of Cain and Abel is a story which carries an echo of the Neolithic Revolution. Abel, the Pastoralist Nomad, sacrifices his excess which pleases God. Cain, the First Agriculturalist, who must possess the land (which is another way of saying deprive its use to others, unlike the Nomad) in order to cultivate it, desires what able possesses, that is, the favor of God. Cain doesn't understand that this excess of possession and covetousness of his brother is the very thing which displeases God. Cain, the Agriculturalist, murders his brother Abel, the Nomad. God spares Cain, and doesn't just spare him, but protects Cain from others with a Mark and Cain goes off to establish the First City, Nod.

Genesis reveals that the Foundation of Civilization is Covetousness and Murder, which is why, no matter how much we Scapegoat and Murder, we can never rid ourselves of Scapegoating and Murder because this Civilization functions on it.

It's certain jews at the top, but at the same time their religion is retarded so fuck them all anyways. Just stop being jewish, ez.

The Anti-Christ wont be human.

It'll be a machine. That much is pretty obvious.

Think about the disastrous conditions that have befallen on humanity with each subsequent technological revolution: Neolithic, Agrarian Revolution, Industrial Revolution, Digital Revolution...

We are husks of real humans. We are weak, brittle, poisoned by countless artificial, horrendous chemicals, alienated from the most fundamental conditions of human life: family, kin, land. These issues were caused by technological developments.

If you think of technological progress as an alien entity, you can see the big picture. The coming autonomous conscious artificial intelligence will be our end. Think about it: what better entity to declare himself God and actually convince anyone nowadays than an artificial superintelligence?

Lucifer was the bringer of light. Its parallel to the myth of Prometheus. These are demonic entities with imbue humanity with knowledge to do things. ie:technology

Thats why there are elites who revere Moloch: he's a personification of Capital, money. This is what drives all technological advances since the Neolithic. The greed for ever larger wealth, no matter the consequences. This was just a vessel towards unimaginable horror.

Subversion is hardwired in their DNA.

I read a good article the other day about how The Big Lebowski, directed by the (((Coen brothers))), was one of the most subversive movies ever made. The White protagonist, The Dude, is portrayed as lazy, slothful, and easily controlled — and yet the audience is supposed to view these traits as admirable and worthy of emulating. The author concluded that the directors likely weren’t even intentionally trying to subvert the goyim, but they did so simply because they don’t know any other way.

If you don't believe me, Moloch literally means "King" in the same way that Baal means "Lord", both "He who possesses", reflecting the invention of Private Property after the Neolithic Revolution

Fun Fact: The original Hebrew word for angel is "malakh" or "messenger", commonly Malakh YHWH/Elohim (Angels of the Lord). And yes, it comes from the same root as Moloch, who was a man with the head of an bull and angels such as cherubim are described as having the head of an bull.

I find the Huemonke schizo sperging so boring.

Lucifer according to Isaiah and Ezekiel was the Anointed (which means Crowned/Blessed) Cherub of the Lord. He is the Morning Star (Venus) associated with the King of Tyre, who had the title of Hiram (meaning Exalted Brother) and one of them sent Hiram Abiff to help Solomon build his temple. In Western art, cherubs became associated with Puttus and the Greco-Roman god Cupid/Eros, with depictions as small, plump, winged boys. According to grimoires, Lucifer looks like a blond child.

The triad at the top of the hierarchical structure of the Livre des Esperitz, the Book of Offices and, by extension, the Pseudomonarchia Daemonum and Lemegeton, comprises Lucifer, Belzebuth, and Satan. The chief of these is Lucifer, the Father of all Devils. He is described as a being of great beauty whose vanity led him to become the sovereign of hell, or as “a boy of very fine appearance, greater than can be described,”(1) whose eyes flash like the Sun and become flooded with redness when he is angry

1. Peterson, Joseph H. (ed. and tr.), Secrets of Solomon: A Witch's Handbook from the Trial Record of the Venetian Inquisition, Twilit Grotto Press, 2018, 8

Lucifer. Illustration du Dictionnaire infernal de Jacques Auguste Simon Collin de Plancy par Louis Le Breton, 6eme édition, 1863.

The people who mixed with the Natufians to create the Canaanites/Phoenicians were the Caucasus Hunter-Gatherers, who also mixed with the Eastern Hunter-Gatherers (who were more likely to have the blond hair mutation than their Ancient North Eurasian ancestors, who are also ancestors of the Amerindians) to create the Yamnaya/Proto-Indo-Europeans.

I'm talking about all this because Lucifer is associated with childhood and the idea of Protogonos/Logos like Christ.

There is no “brown hair gene” you have competing genetics for black and blonde hair creating the brown hair phenotype which is an expression of incomplete dominance in the genome meaning the mutation for blonde hair is present but not dominant, which is exactly what blonde people have but with a different presentation and yes everyone that has (actually) brown hair had blond hair when they were younger.

Thats the only way they're able to live among humans.

Lucifer is Latin - “Luci” is Latin for "light" and “fer” is Latin for “to bring”. “Phanes” is the exact same name but Greek; it’s a morphed word that means “to make appear” or “illuminate”, like turning on the lights in a dark room to make things visible. Lucifer is far older than Christianity, and he was worshipped by certain aristocratic sects as the Supreme God by the Greeks and the Romans - the Orphic sects. He was the God who was the first emanation of Chaos/the Monad that gave order and created the Universe and set the stage; he was, in those sects, pretty much the divine emanation of Eros (Cupid), because it’s love that underpins the Universe - the struggle of consciousness learning to love themselves and love others.

And they - the Hellenics - 100% connected Phanes to other Greek gods like Eosphoros. There’s morning star imagery all throughout the Orphic hymns to Protogenus/Phanes. When the Abrahamics took over, he took on a new mythological form, one that uses darker aesthetics and spooky hell imagery - but they are the same God. The sheer irony of course is that when the Christians stole Platonic philosophy and applied it to Jesus, they ended up stealing Luciferian metaphysics and applying it to Jesus. It’s why you often get a sense from some people that there’s a connection to Jesus and Lucifer - it’s because the Jesus myth of being the primordial first begotten (Logos) of God who gives order to the Universe and created the Universe out of love was lifted directly from the Luciferian sects.

Fascinating

In Orphic cosmogony Phanes /ˈfeJˌniːz/ (Ancient Greek: Φάνης, romanized: Phánēs, genitive Φάνητος) or Protogonos /proʊˈtɒɡənəs/ (Ancient Greek: Πρωτογόνος, romanized: Prōtogónos, lit.'Firstborn') is a primeval deity who was born from the cosmic egg at the beginning of creation. He is referred by various names, including Erikepaios "Power" /ˌɛrJkəˈpiːəs/ (Ancient Greek: Ἠρικαπαῖος/Ἠρικεπαῖος, romanized: Ērikapaîos/Ērikepaîos) and Metis "Thought"

Chronos is said to have created the silver egg of the universe out of which burst the first-born deity Phanes, or Phanes-Dionysus. Phanes was a male god; in an original Orphic hymn he is named as "Lord Priapos", although others consider him androgynous.

Called Protogonos (First-Born) and Eros (Love)—being the seed of gods and men—Phanes means "to bring light" or "to shine" and is related to the Greek "to shine forth" as well as the Latin "Lucifer". An ancient Orphic hymn addresses him thus:

"Ineffable, hidden, brilliant scion, whose motion is whirring, you scattered the dark mist that lay before your eyes and, flapping your wings, you whirled about, and through this world you brought pure light."

According to Hesiod's Theogony (c. 700 BC), one of the most ancient of Greek sources, Eros (Light/Love) was the fourth god to come into existence, coming after Chaos (Formless and Empty, Darkness), Gaia (Earth), and Tartarus (Abyss)

"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Now the earth was Formless and Empty, Darkness was over the surface of the Abyss, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters. And God said, “Let there be Light,” and there was Light." (Genesis 1:1-4)

In the ancient Eastern mythologies, the cosmogonic myth states that there was but water (the father) and the prolific slime (the mother, Ilus or Hyle), from which crept forth the mundane snake-matter. It was the god Phanes, the revealed one, the Word, or logos. How willingly this myth was accepted, even by the Christians who compiled the New Testament, may be easily inferred from the following fact: Phanes, the revealed god, is represented in this snake-symbol as a protogonos, a being furnished with the heads of a man, a hawk or an eagle, a bull--taurus, and a lion, with wings on both sides. The heads relate to the zodiac, and typify the four seasons of the year, for the mundane serpent is the mundane year, while the serpent itself is the symbol of Kneph, the hidden, or unrevealed deity--God the Father

Time is winged, therefore the serpent is represented with wings. If we remember that each of the four evangelists is represented as having near him one of the described animals--grouped together in Solomon's triangle in the pentacle of Ezekiel, and to be found in the four cherubs or sphinxes of the sacred arch--we will perhaps understand the secret meaning, as well as the reason why the early Christians adopted this symbol; and how it is that the present Roman Catholics and the Greeks of the Oriental Church still represent these animals in the pictures of their evangelists which sometimes accompany the four Gospels. We will also understand why Irenaeus, Bishop of Lyons, had so insisted upon the necessity of the fourth gospel; giving as a reason that there could not be less than four of them, as there were four zones in the world, and four principal winds coming from the four cardinal points, etc

I was always curious of recessive genes b4 is the only "pattern" in mutt gene expression

Because we know how shallow White women all are and how they can be used to control White men who don't control themselves. It is true. White women are used to sell things other than just in ads, my man.

As far as I know, blonde hair comes from Ancient North Eurasians, who lived in Siberia. The initial ANE was 2/3 Proto-Proto-European (65% Ancient West Eurasians) and 1/3 Proto-Abbo/Mongoloid (35% Ancient East Eurasians). As they mixed with other AEE and migrated towards the Bering Strait to America their % of ANE in their blood decreased the further they migrated towards South America. This is why North American Amerindians have robust skulls while those in the South have spherical/round Asian faces and they get fat easily as pic related (Mexicans are some of the fattest people in the world and so are male members on my father's side of the family).

Native Americans have the highest amount of ANE DNA of any living population, around 30% or more. Indigenous Siberians such as the Kets people also have a large amount of ANE dna. Europeans also have quite a good amount, especially Balts, Finns and such, at about 20%. Corded Ware, Yamnaya etc all had a good amount of ANE dna. I think it was strongly sexually selected for in Europe. Not so much in Natives. An offshoot of ANE people fled into Eastern Europe we call EHG they were the first blondes than it spread through sexual selection the indo-europeans actually became blonde slowly through a process of diffusion from Scandinavia.

Blonde hair is a recessive trait that evolves from intense selection pressures which explains why Nordics are more progressive evolutionary than all others.

Speaking of the ethnogenesis of these ancient populations: Natufians are the product of ancient miscegenation between CHG/Caucasian-like Kebara people and Pardo Iberomaurusians. They are basically ancient quadroons and octoroons mulattoes.

Roman Senator and historian, Cornelius Tacitus (110 A.D.) had written that the Jews often traveled to Crete to celebrate the festival of Pentecost in Jerusalem and that they eventually were exiled from the island when Saturn was driven from his throne by the violence of Jupiter. The Cretans are called Idaeans, and then Judieans who eventually became fugitives from the island and who then settled on the nearest coast of Africa in the remotest corner of Libya. They are said to be descendants of the Ethiopians which would connect them to the children of Moses who is said to be the Father of Ethiopia

Modern East Africans (Horners) were first known as the Ethiopian race, who the proto-ethiopid race were descended from a an Caucasoid-like race. The proto-ethiopoid race was the only race of the "blacks" to have Neanderthal ancestry. The PROTO Ethiopoid race were most likely used to build the Egyptian Pyramids. This period dates back FAR into pre-history. We could even classify the proto-ethiopoid race as Caucasoid, perhaps ancient Jews. This is where the Negroes get, "we wuz jewish." Subsaharans do not have Neanderthal admixture. Only kushites like Ethiopians have a trace amount. Ethiopians have a lot of Arab and levantine admixture due to their proximity to the ME, they also have more Neanderthal DNA than any SSA group.

So that should make me ignore the toxic feminism and leftism (also crafted by jews) that they push everywhere?

Back in 1971, physical anthropologist J. Lawrence Angel wrote in The People of Lerna that the skeletal remains of Neolithic peoples in Greece and Macedonia showed “Negroid” physical traits common to African people, which he speculated had arrived in the region from the Nile Valley of Egypt and Sudan. More recently in 2005, C. Loring Brace claimed that the remains of a prehistoric Middle Eastern people called the Natufians — among the immediate predecessors to the first farmers in the Fertile Crescent and then Europe— showed “unexpected ties” to African populations

Such ties between the Natufians and African populations may not be limited to skeletal features. Archaeologists such as Ofer Bar-Yosef and Graeme Barker describe the primitive tools the Natufians used as similar to those of earlier populations along Africa’s northern coast, even speculating that these similarities could attest to African technological influences if not a full-blown migration

If the skeletal and archaeological data hinted at recent African admixture in the first farmers of the Fertile Crescent and their European offshoots, later genetic data from remains such as these would confirm it — even if the geneticists haven’t always realized it

When analyzing ancient DNA extracted from various prehistoric remains in 2014, Iosif Lazaridis concluded that the first farmers to appear in Europe had 44% of their ancestry derived from a population he called “Basal Eurasian”, characterized by an almost complete absence of the Neanderthal ancestry that all non-African people have inherited today. He would later find in a second study that approximately half of the ancestry in Natufian and early Neolithic Middle Eastern populations came from this “Basal Eurasian” heritage

Common sense alone would imply that this so-called “Basal Eurasian” component must actually be African. After all, it is the indigenous peoples of Africa, not anywhere in Eurasia or the rest of the habitable world, who have little to no Neanderthal ancestry. Yet, in a sense, Lazaridis’s label might only be partly wrong. One of the ramifications of the “Out of Africa” theory is that not all African people will be equally related to those outside the continent. Instead, those Africans from whom non-Africans splintered off (i.e. populations in the northeastern region of the continent) would have a greater genetic affinity to those non-Africans than would other Africans. And indeed, genetic research has revealed that native Northeast African ancestry is genetically closer to that of non-Africans than is ancestry from, say, West or Central Africa (the ancestry of aboriginal peoples from southernmost Africa, who speak Khoisan languages, is the furthest removed of all). This means that Northeast Africans really would represent a population basal to non-Africans (hence “Basal Eurasian”)

It is very likely, then, that the “Basal Eurasian” ancestry identified by Lazaridis and his colleagues actually comes from a native Northeast African population that stayed home on the continent for tens of millennia before moving into the Middle East and giving rise to the Natufians between 12,500 and 9500 BC

An estimation for Holocene-era Near Easterners (e.g., Mesolithic Caucasus hunter-gatherers, Mesolithic and Neolithic Iranians, and Natufians) suggests that they formed from a combination of Basal Eurasian ancestry, and Western Hunter-Gatherer-related (WHG) and or Ancient North Eurasians-related (ANE) ancestries respectively. The Mesolithic and Neolithic Iranian lineage is inferred to derived between 38–48% ancestry from Basal Eurasians respectively, with the remainder ancestry being made up by Ancient North Eurasian or Eastern Hunter-Gatherer (EHG)

Anthropologist C. Loring Brace (1993) cross-analysed the craniometric traits of Natufian specimens with those of various ancient and modern groups from the Near East, Africa and Europe. The Late Pleistocene Epipalaeolithic Natufian sample was described as problematic due to its small size (consisting of only three males and one female), as well as the lack of a comparative sample from the Natufians' putative descendants in the Neolithic Near East, such as the PPNB. Nonetheless, Brace observed that the Natufian fossils lay between those of the Niger–Congo-speaking series included and the other samples (Near East, Europe), which he suggested may point to a Sub-Saharan influence in their constitution. Subsequent ancient DNA analysis of Natufian skeletal remains by Lazaridis et al. (2016) instead found that the specimens were a mix of 50% Basal Eurasian ancestral component (see Archaeogenetics) and 50% West-Eurasian Unknown Hunter Gatherer (UHG) population related to European Western Hunter-Gatherers. Natufians have also been described by other anthropologists as a Proto-Mediterranean population, being similar to the Kebarans

Ancient DNA analysis of Natufian skeletal remains found that the Natufian ancestry could be modelled as a mix of about 50% Basal Eurasian ancestry and 50% from a West-Eurasian Unknown Hunter Gatherer (UHG) population, which was related to the western hunter-gatherer group of Mesolithic Europe. Vallini et al. (2024) modeled the amount of Basal Eurasian ancestry among Natufians at roughly 15%, with the remainder being associated with West Eurasian sources

The Natufian population also displays ancestral ties to Paleolithic Taforalt samples, the makers of the Epipaleolithic Iberomaurusian culture of the Maghreb, the Pre-Pottery Neolithic culture of the Levant, the Early Neolithic Ifri N'Amr Ou Moussa and the Late Neolithic Kelif el Boroud culture of North Africa, with samples associated with these early cultures all sharing a common genomic component dubbed the "Natufian component", which diverged from other West Eurasian lineages ~26,000 years ago, and is most closely linked to the Arabian lineage. Possible bidirectional geneflow events between these groups has also been suggested, with particular evidence for affinity between the Natufians and Iberomaurusians

Contact between Natufians and other Neolithic Levantines, Caucasus hunter-gatherers (CHG), Anatolian and Iranian farmers is believed to have decreased genetic variability among later populations in the Middle East. Migrations from the Near-East also occurred towards Africa, and the West Eurasian-like ancestry among populations in the Horn of Africa being best represented by the Levant Neolithic, and may be associated with the spread of Afroasiatic languages. Lazaridis et al. (2016) did not find a greater genetic affinity between Natufians and sub-Saharan Africans than that existing between sub-Saharan Africans and other ancient populations of Western Eurasia, and also stated that the ancestry of a primitive population from North Africa could not be tested because modern North Africans are largely descended from late migrant populations from Eurasia

The Natufian population also displays ancestral ties to Paleolithic Taforalt samples, the makers of the Epipaleolithic Iberomaurusian culture of the Maghreb, the Pre-Pottery Neolithic culture of the Levant, the Early Neolithic Ifri N'Amr Ou Moussa and the Late Neolithic Kelif el Boroud culture of North Africa, with samples associated with these early cultures all sharing a common genomic component dubbed the "Natufian component", which diverged from other West Eurasian lineages ~26,000 years ago, and is most closely linked to the Arabian lineage. Possible bidirectional geneflow events between these groups has also been suggested, with particular evidence for affinity between the Natufians and Iberomaurusians

Contact between Natufians and other Neolithic Levantines, Caucasus hunter-gatherers (CHG), Anatolian and Iranian farmers is believed to have decreased genetic variability among later populations in the Middle East. Migrations from the Near-East also occurred towards Africa, and the West Eurasian-like ancestry among populations in the Horn of Africa being best represented by the Levant Neolithic, and may be associated with the spread of Afroasiatic languages. Lazaridis et al. (2016) did not find a greater genetic affinity between Natufians and sub-Saharan Africans than that existing between sub-Saharan Africans and other ancient populations of Western Eurasia, and also stated that the ancestry of a primitive population from North Africa could not be tested because modern North Africans are largely descended from late migrant populations from Eurasia

This is why Jews have more SSA than Meds.

Haplogroup E-M96 is a human Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup. It is one of the two main branches of the older and ancestral haplogroup DE, the other main branch being haplogroup D. The E-M96 clade is divided into two main subclades: the more common E-P147, and the less common E-M75

Most members of haplogroup E-M96 belong to E1, while haplogroup E2-M75 is rare. Haplogroup E1a is split into two main branches: E1a1 (E-M44) which has been mostly found in Europe, West Asia and among Ashkenazi Jews; and E1a2 (E-Z958) which has been exclusively identified in Sub-Saharan Africa. Haplogroup E-M2 is the most prevalent subclade of E in Sub-Saharan Africa and is strongly associated with expansion of Bantu speakers

E-P147 (also known as E1) is by far the most numerous and widely distributed branch of E-M96. It has two primary branches: E-M132 (E1a) and E-P177 (E1b). Haplogroup E1a is split into two branches: E1a1 (E-M44) which has been mostly found in Europe, West Asia and among Ashkenazi Jews; and E1a2 (E-Z958) which has been exclusively identified in Sub-Saharan Africa

Private commercial DNA testing at Family Tree DNA shows numerous E-M75 males originating from the Arabian Peninsula (Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, Yemen, and the United Arab Emirates), and among Ashkenazi Jews. E-M75 has also been identified in a Lebanese male

In 2011, Moorjani et al. detected 3%–5% sub-Saharan African ancestry in all eight of the diverse Jewish populations (Ashkenazi Jews, Syrian Jews, Iranian Jews, Iraqi Jews, Greek Jews, Turkish Jews, Italian Jews) that they analyzed. The timing of this African admixture among all Jewish populations was identical. The exact date was not determined, but it was estimated to have taken place between 1,600 and 3,400 years ago. Although African admixture was determined among South Europeans and Near Eastern population too, this admixture was found to be younger compared to the Jewish populations. This findings the authors explained as evidence regarding common origin of these 8 main Jewish groups. "It is intriguing that the Mizrahi Irani and Iraqi Jews—who are thought to descend at least in part from Jews who were exiled to Babylon about 2,600 years ago share the signal of African admixture. A parsimonious explanation for these observations is that they reflect a history in which many of the Jewish groups descend from a common ancestral population which was itself admixed with Africans, prior to the beginning of the Jewish diaspora that occurred in 8th to 6th century BC" the authors concluded

Moorjani et al. (2011) estimated that some Southern Europeans have inherited 1%–3% sub-Saharan ancestry (approximately 3.2% in Portugal, 2.9% in Sardinia, 2.7% in southern Italy, 2.4% in Spain and 1.1% in northern Italy), although the percentages were lower (ranging from 0.2% in Sardinia and northern Italy to 2.1% in Portugal) when reanalyzed with the 'STRUCTURE' statistical model. An average mixture date of around 55 generations/1100 years ago was given, "consistent with North African gene flow at the end of the Roman Empire and subsequent Arab migrations". This admixture was not identified in Northern Europeans

Because it controls the goyims you fucking retard. They don't have the numbers for the violence methods.

It's is obvious objective for controlling people.

They'll do anything but get an actual job.

this
they are so lazy they would rather scheme world wars and genocides rather than having a day of work

To avoid being genocided they need to run 24/7 social engineering to make people tolerate their presence

When your people have been expelled 1,030 times since Babylon you finally try new techniques.

They are physically weak. They have no way to protect themselves if the majority turns on them.

Because social engineering is psychological warfare. It's how they fight their battles.

Also thanks to open borders if one population gets uppity it can quickly be diluted with another.

BTW This is why Aphrodite/Venus, the goddess of love and mother of Eros/Cupid, was blonde. She came from the Phoenician Astarte (20% CHG, 30% EEF and 50% Natufian), which came from the Babylonian Ishtar (30% CHG%, 20 EEF and 50% Natufians), which came from the Sumerian Inanna (50% CHG, 20% EEF and 30% Natufians). It was the CHG (who also descended from ANE) who brought blond hair to some Natufians and ANF/EEF (from whom the Greeks/Romans and other Mediterranean Europeans descend more, who gained more blond hair with the coming of the Yamnaya/IE, who were themselves a product of the WHG with EHG).

In Western culture, blonde hair has long been associated with beauty and vitality. Aphrodite, the Greek goddess of love and beauty, was described as having blonde hair. In ancient Greece and Rome, blonde hair was frequently associated with prostitutes, who dyed their hair using saffron dyes in order to attract customers. The Greeks stereotyped Thracians and slaves as blond and the Romans associated blondness with the Celts and the Germans to the north

Aphrodite, the Greek goddess of love and beauty known to the Romans as Venus, was often described as golden-haired and portrayed with this color hair in art. Aphrodite's master epithet in the Homeric epics is χρυσέη (khruséē), which means "golden"

Sappho also praises Aphrodite for her golden hair, stating that since gold metal is free from rust, the goddess' golden hair represents her freedom from ritual pollution

The most famous statue of Aphrodite, the Aphrodite of Knidos, sculpted in the fourth century BC by Praxiteles, represented the goddess' hair using gold leaf and contributed to the popularity of the image of Aphrodite as a blonde goddess

youtube.com/watch?v=aCbxws6yT-g

He had a big butt probably because of the Natufian/Basal Eurasian mix (populations that had a late Neolithic Revolution like West Africans still have Steatopygia to store energy for hunting-gathering running just like most Eurasians before that as the Venus Figurines show).

Aphrodite, the Greek goddess of love and beauty known to the Romans as Venus, was often described as golden-haired and portrayed with this color hair in art. Aphrodite's master epithet in the Homeric epics is χρυσέη (khruséē), which means "golden"

Let me tell you a story about the worship of a deity in antiquity: Aphrodite Kallipygos or Aphrodite "with the great butt" and a temple in Syracuse dedicated to great butts

The origin of the cult of this Aphrodite would be the following. Athenaios (Deipnosophists 12.554 c–e.) say that the two daughters of a relatively prosperous farmer in Siracusa (Italy), beautiful, cheerful and of sharp wit, bet one Sicilian summer evening on the beauty of their buttocks to see which of them was worthy of the first prize. For this they agreed to show it to a passerby and have him decide who was the winner

The girls lived on the outskirts of the city, so they had to wait a long time to find the appropriate judge. At last a young man with broad shoulders and a neat tunic appeared on the slope of the road. At the precise moment when he reached where they were and saw them, Helena lifted her tunic and, smiling, looked down at her buttocks

So when Aspasia told him about the bet and in turn showed him her own buttocks, he could no longer think of anything but Helena’s ass. Of course you voted for it. In fact, he fell in love with her, so much so that when he returned to the city he told his younger brother what had happened. The younger brother went to the outskirts of town as soon as he could to see the girls. It turns out that he fell in love with the younger sister, even long before he was lucky enough to see her bare buttocks

The boys plead with their father to allow them to marry the girls, and the father could not deny them when he saw the girls. They married, and the girls became famous for their assets, and were called The Fair-Buttocks. Since they had become rich and famous, they founded a temple to Aphrodite in thanks, and it was dedicated to he aspect of the goddess relating to beautiful butts, and the temple was then manned only by women with beautiful rear-ends

Ancient Greece knew the beauty pageants, it is known that the Callipyge festivals were celebrated in honor of Aphrodite, the celebration consisted of a beauty pageant in which women exposed their buttocks to be judged, hence the term Callipyge, the one with beautiful buttocks

In Ancient Greek literature, as frequent are the descriptions or exclamations of admiration for a beautiful butt, those for a beautiful breast are equally rare, not to mention the female genitals which were always passed over in silence

Alciphron also describes a competition that took place between two girls over who had the most beautiful and delicate bottom: Mirrina was the first to untie her belt and began to move her buttocks, which were shaking like pudding, and turned her head backwards to check the butt movement; then he began to make soft moans. Triallide didn't give up... She took off her tunic and, bending her back a little, said: look, look at that colour, full of youth, intact and pure: the pinkness of her hips, their slope towards the thighs; they are neither too plump nor gaunt, and then the dimples at the ends (Letters of Courtesans, "Megara to Bacchide", 14)

Hesiod had already alluded to later beauties to warn man against the power of seduction of women: "Let not a woman who adorns her behind deceive your heart by whispering caressing words to you" (Works and Days)

Interestingly, the etymology of Aphrodite and Africa comes from the same.

Etymology of "Africa":

The present name of Africa was used first by Scipio Africanus, conqueror of Carthago, and has meant originally only the region around Carthago and Utica where the Libyan people of the Afri were living. The Afri claimed their descent from Aphros, therefore the name Aphroi (Lat. Afri). After the victory over Carthago in 146 BC the name Africa was extended by the Romans under the name Africa proconsularis up to the border of Egypt. The continent itself was called Libya

According to Georgios Kedrenos, a Byzantine historian of the 11th resp.12th century, who has written in his "Concise History of the World" about the etymology of the Afri, Aphros was the husband of Astynome, who bore Aphrodite to him. Naturally Aphrodite and Aphros have the same etymology (Gr. aphros = foam). Astonyme herself came from the "island" of Lakeria, which is nothing other than the Thessalian city of Lakereia at Magnesia the home of Cheiron and Philyra too. These all was a explanation remodelled especially for the African etymology (Pauly's Realenzyklopädie). And here seems to be the source of the mythology that Aphros was the son of Kronos and Philyra and thereby the brother of Cheiron

To really answer this question you should read the book Culture of Critique by Kevin MacDonald. It goes into extreme detail on your topic. The short answer is that they have to control entire societies of goyim because they're inherently a minority group, and their behavior requires the goyim to not notice their actions or influence.

This book is seriously worth a read, even if you're already anti semitic, because it provides evidence you can use to redpill normies on the JQ.

If you don't want to read it, you could probably upload the PDF to chatgpt and have it give a summary essay.