Why don't politicians understand that migration is not a solution to fertility?

Why don't politicians understand that migration is not a solution to fertility?
Also, why do we HAVE to have more people anyway?

It's called the Kalergi plan. Have you seen Europa - The Last Battle and Greatest Story Never Told yet? You also should read Culture of Critique

Capitalism can only go up. Numbers go down is very bad. Must always grow

Anon the point of immigration is to weaken the population so that you can be controlled and ruled more easily. Especially in democracies where you get to vote. The entire point is to weaken your ability to organize around any similarities. The entire civil rights movement in the west happened because white men had unionized and it was profitable to make white organization unacceptable.

They do understand.
It's intentional.

DAS KAPITAL

They understand

Artificially increased status of women is what leads to low fertility. The irony that they have to import moslems in almost every case who don't fall for any feminist shit is lost on them.

have children you fucking eunuchs

Everybody saying it's about political control is retarded. It's about money. Politicians have spent the last 6 straight decades debt spending up to the point where the US is now $38t in debt. This is an impossible sum to pay without austerity or increasing the GDP or devaluing the dollar, but any politician that imposes austerity is doomed in the next election and devaluing the dollar has political and economic consequences as well. Therefore, the most attractive option is to increase the GDP to increase the annual tax take to reduce the overall impact of debt on the national budget so that it can be paid and nobody has to meaningfully cut spending. To that end, they can either increase GDP per capita, or they can increase capita, since GDP is GDP per capita times capita. Increasing GDP per capita is hard, increasing capita just involves inviting over infinity third worlders, so that's the choice they pick. It doesn't work and it causes even more problems, but those problems are slightly less immediate and slightly less likely to lead to politicians being hanged on the nearest street light, so that's what they do.

It's all about money and never thinking about long term consequences because they won't be in charge long term, because they're elected representatives and only need to concern themselves with the current election cycle.

have children you fucking eunuchs

Man the problem over here is that the women are all fat as fuck. And then the ones who aren't are instantly 8/10, in high demand. So basically it's rough out here if you refuse to fuck fatties. And then also you have the jews shipping in millions of shitskins and giving them gibs because they want a rootless borderles brown slave class low iq goyim

Human trafficking is the biggest business in the world. White women are the most valuable commodity in the world. Which is why the biggest business of corporations and academia is importing young males to the West and not whatever their actual mission statement is.

its normal to reduce children in an advanced society
you see it worldwide

a country is poor

a lot of children

a country is wealthy

not so many children

its quality over quantity, you dont need 5 kids if everyone is retarded

Neoliberal parties listen to corporate lobbyists who tell them they don't have enough "skilled labor and talent in the country" and then demand for more immigration or outsourcing.

You can not serious believe politicians honesty believe mass immigration is a solution to anything. After the decades of politicians and the media screaming 'diversity is our strength' while demonizing anyone who complains about mass immigration as being a xenophobic nazi surely you can not still believe politicians have anything good in mind

I know many of you niggers are just trying to spark conversation and some of you are actually clueless morons who have not followed these social/political issues almost daily for decades but at what point will you niggers finally understand government and the propaganda media are the enemy

Everybody saying it's about political control is retarded. It's about money.

No it isn't. The rothschild jewish banking family controls most of the world's fiat currency printing and distribution. These invaders are a net drain on White tax payers. We're dealing with jewish bankers like Soros and Rothschild. They already have infinite money. This is about absolute control over a brown low iq borderless goyim. It's all on record.

Look into the Kalergi plan

Yep
Literally get rid of all nigger, shitskins and kikes and all the countries economies will be fixed

Why don't politicians understand that migration is not a solution to fertility?

Why don't you understand that they do understand but they don't care.

They want to replace you with people who will live in slums and work for nothing.

That is not white people.

Why don't politicians understand

They do, they do this on purpose you dumb NIGGER

NAW! You psychos will then scapegoat the gingers. Any excuse for bloodshed...

AI sloppa really showed them

why do we HAVE to have more people anyway?

to lower your quality of life and keep the poor fighting each other instead of the big guy upstairs

They do understand that though, you are nothing but a number to them or even worse they actively dislike you

remove "lack of housing" and the graph would be perfect

It's actually because there's an ageing population crisis, without migrants providing cheap labour your quality of life would be even lower and old people would need to make up for the missing productivity

Without migrants providing cheap labor they'd have to pay enough that we might even have single income households.

It was never about fertility or skilled labour.

paying more isn't going to magically increase the labor supply, there is going to be a labor shortage unless you make old people work until they die and force people to keep birth rates above replacement

Whites are objectively the most sniveling spineless cowards in human history for tolerating this

Yeah. That's great. I don't want to increase the labor supply. I want to increase the quality of life for working Whites. Fuck your parasitic ZOG cheap labor schemes

((They)) claim we need mass migration because working age immigrants contribute tax revenue to pay for the elderly population that grew up during the greatest financial gains in history and had more purchasing power but squandered or horde their wealth. Old people have the highest health care costs and voted for mass immigration so I think they should be cut off and thrown to the wolves

The WEF will tell investment funds like blackrock to not invest in your country unless you make it nonwhite and woke.

then you have a problem, because the fertility crisis means labor supply will fall and so will quality of life with more old people depending on fewer workers

quality of life would be lower

Lower how? Id have white neighbors? I wouldn't have to sit next to smelly pajeets on the bus?
What labour shortage? Every manufacturing job has been offshored, anything remaining is automated. The only reason no one wants to be a framer or plumber is because shitskins flooded the labour pool and drive down wages. If there truly was a shortage, trades would pay well in order to provide an incentive for people to join them. But kikes don't want to pay a liveable wage when there's abundant immigrants to take those jobs. in addition, the immigrants coming in are so numerous they take jobs where there is no shortage like buisness or IT

Gingers

Never said that you dumb mutt
you are just worried because natural selection is going to get rid of you all inbred kike potato niggers whose average penis size is 2 inches, even lower than some Asian countries

you can't outsource labor like healthcare, construction, sanitation, etc. without migrants

health care

Cut off the old people. Why the fuck are extending the lives of people from 85 to 95 when those years are spent bedridden or in advanced dementia costing tax payers up to 30% of all heath care spending.

construction

What is a 3D printed house?

sanitation

Sewer pipes last up to 100 years and sewage treatment is automated
You don't need immigrants if you pay white people a fair wage to do those jobs. Why the fuck do we need a dozen HR reps or 1000's of middle managers for every company? They could be roofers but won't because kikes would rather pay immigrants a lower wage to shitty quality work

more people = more workers = more money for billionaires

that's great if you accept that quality of life will go down without migration

Shit's been reposted so many times it's starting to develop an old-school veil over it.

My quality of life has been consistently going down with migration, so we might as well try something different to see if things improve, no?

lack of housing is the sole reason for reduced fertility

it doesn't help, but the fundamental reason is that white people became decadent degenerates and stopped giving a shit

amish.jpg - 1366x2048, 285.57K

How nigger? Tell me exactly how quality of life will go down. I don't eat Asian food. I can live without social media and their army of pajeet coders. Are you saying my purchasing power will go down? Nigger it has gone down in Canada because of chinks and pajeets flooding this country.

c-g23-eng.png - 850x416, 13.43K

How long did that post stay up on plebbit before being taken down for hate speech and racism?

I agree, I just hate when people cope and say quality of life would be better without migrants. There's a built in problem of too many old people living longer and not working with too few children being born

quality of life will go down without migration

I wonder who's behind this post.

If immigration from these countries is so beneficial then why isn't israel taking any? Isn't israel missing out on the benefits of diversity? Shouldn't we be sharing some of our immigrants with israel so our greatest ally can benefit too?

I wish Lady Mass Immigration would come to my town. I want a cute little hijabi woman from Southeast Asia to dote on.

Israel has a healthy fertility rate and they're a relatively new country with a lot of inward Jewish migration

why do we need more people

The ponzi scheme known as the pension

Dumb. Lack of housing doesn't cause reduced fertility. Wealth is inversely correlated with fertility up until around $250,000/year. What is HIGHLY correlated to fertility is amount of years women spend in education, and career.

Like the data is ALL RIGHT THERE. This isn't a fucking hypothesis, there literally is no more question about why people have less kids than they used to.

Use the migrants to build more houses. Problem solved.

Why don't politicians understand that migration is not a solution to fertility?

What's the solution then?

Also, why do we HAVE to have more people anyway?

Investments, the economy must grow every quarter.

/thread

Why does lower standard of living lead to higher fertility in the brown countries, but not in yours? Maybe you're just too old to have babies.

Quality of life has gone down WITH migration
I'll take my chances abdul

Try and keep up with the facts, sweetie.

2.jpg - 941x931, 133.65K

if you do <norm for all of human history> you’ll have to accept whoever quality of life

I know <latest jewish degeneracy> is also bad but it’s inevitable so you just have to do it even if it’s worse

IMG_2047.jpg - 926x764, 266.55K

They don’t give a shit about fertility. They want cheap labor to juice their shareholder equity.

Most Western politicians, would never, ever, suggest that citizens have more children. That's something Hitler did.
Can you imagine? Making a judgement based on society's needs? Maybe even suggesting adoption rather than aborting babies?
No, better to wither on the vine, and let 3rd worlders play among the ruins.

Explain to me how Anon Babble is anti-immigration but pro-capitalism.

muh ebil politicians

Nigga, if they announce a referendum with the question "No more immigrants but your quality of life drops 30%" how many would vote yes?

follow your leader

move to argentina and have 2 kids

o-okay?

Being paid way more means the quality of life goes up, and that's not including the improvements to quality of life from the absence of third worlders.

You have a problem. Not me. I want to improve the quality of life, not degrade it like yourself.

why do we have to have more people

Imagine you have $1 and you want to trade with someone for their $1, perfectly equal and fair trading.
Now the jew comes along and says hey you both need to give me $0.50 if you do that.
So now any time you want to trade with anyone, both parties lose value from what they started with.
This is an accurate depiction of all modern commerce/trade/employment.

Obviously this is completely unsustainable trickery that can only work on the stupidest of 'humanity'; and importing more and more 'people' is used to dilute the actual thinking group that could oppose it.

The people in charge are also absolutely fucking retarded and have no understanding of what arrable land is and why you can't just bulldoze all of it for highrises.

Rent seeking should never have been permitted in any circumstance. It naturally drives housing cost up to absorb all excess income because it is required to live.

lack of workers

Canada's employment rate was around 40% when Trudeau imported 4 million Indians because Canadians were openly revolting against his despotism. It's now back to 60%.

The good news is we are going to see all of these kikes exterminated in the next decade.

Anon Babble wants a population of white dumb uneducated religious rednecks that breed like rabbits. Idiocracy basically

Sounds like Appalachia.

Cut off the old people. Why the fuck are extending the lives of people from 85 to 95 when those years are spent bedridden or in advanced dementia costing tax payers up to 30% of all heath care spending.

The problem is that end-of-life care is literally an infinite money hole with no win condition. We want to extend life from 80 to 90. Either we can afford it or we can't. If we can't we go bankrupt and society collapses. If we can then it just creates the more expensive problem of extending life from 90 to 100. We just keep kicking the can further down the road until eventually we can't afford it. It's not the government's job to make you immortal. immortality requires infinite resources. If you divert all of a society's resources towards trying to make old people immortal than you will have no resources left for anything else, and the old people will still die, just at 108 instead of 107. End-of-life care is the definition of unsustainable. Any society without limits on end-of-life care will be forced into the infinite growth antipattern because infinite growth is the only way to keep up with the exponentially scaling costs of end-of-life care as people get older and older.

Being paid way more means the quality of life goes up

That means businesses will have to pay you more which results in less or no profit for them which leads to them closing the businesses which leads to unemployment and weaker economy.

that's great if you accept that quality of life will go down without migration

If migration improves society then why isn't israel taking these immigrants?

The falling rate of profit

see it's simple mathematics, there will be less workers spread across more people because of the fertility crisis

Israel sucks and nobody who isn't a Jewish supremacist wants to live there.

see

Jews in Israel have fertility rate of 3. Also they get a shitload of free money (directly and indirectly) from the Amerimutts.
It's unfair to compare it to countries with fertility rate below replacement that don't get handouts.

Is it normal to bring in millions of swarthoids from another part of the world to replace the population?

They understand. However, fixing the fertility rate would take planning, execution and accountant. It's much easier to just open the gates, then point to GDP (not GDP per capita, of course) to claim success.

This can't be the full story. Why would billionaires import workers into the countries with minimum wage laws, workplace safety laws etc when they could just move their business to the countries with no minimum wage laws, no workplace safety laws etc? If you live in a 1st world country then immigration is less profitable than outsourcing, so anyone pushing immigration must have other motives.

Israel has a healthy fertility rate

Yeah, because of Ultra Orthodox Jews that do nothing but read the Torah all day, these people aren’t working construction jobs.

see

Under capitalism, yes.

Not everything can be outsourced, but they are pushing in that direction, AI is a big part of that

see

Israel has living standards on par with the west which suggests otherwise

under jews you mean

its normal to reduce children in an advanced society

It's not normal in advanced societies, it's normal in collapsing advanced societies. There is a big difference.

its quality over quantity, you dont need 5 kids

You are putting the cart before the horse. The purpose of children is not to help with work, the purpose of work is to provide for children.

It’s actually a shithole but regardless the people actually breeding there aren’t productive.

Jews are only able to operate within a capitalist framework.

The politicians (and their handlers) aren't doing this in good faith. They're doing this to keep everyone in a race to the bottom and kill the cohesive and high-trust societies we once had.

Short term thinkers who need people to live in their cousins houses so they can get kickbacks.
Anyone who has worked in corporate or government knows long term solid solutions are ignored because it costs more short term.

according to you they've managed to achieve the same standards of living with less labor so by definition they are more productive

It's actually because there's an ageing population crisis

not my problem.
also solving the ageing population crisis with more population is batshit retarded, this problem was caused by irresponsible and explosive population growth to begin with, reap what you sow and all that. big cities should have a population cap to ensure quality of life and people need to stop breeding like niggers, simple as. and stop breeding niggers too while we are at it

The Chinese need to import one billion niggers.

IMG_0288.gif - 800x600, 3.05M

Look up what a welfare state is nigel

Why do Socialists and Communists protest to let in more refugees, while protesting against the deportation of illegal aliens?

Why don't politicians understand that migration is not a solution to fertility?

They understand, they're just paid by jews.

I'm entertaining his retarded hypothesis

Muslims don't work either. If they wanted workers they wouldn't choose them over eastern Europeans.

Lack of housing? I have two homes and 3 hunting properties. Right now I can bring up over one thousand homes in my immediate town that are for sale.

Bullshit.

Europeans who don't understand economics made the graph

the problem is every modern country has below replacement fertility, and everyone's competing for migrants

They obviously care since they're hostile to it. Generational wealth and community structures don't exist unless there are families. And those are perceived threats to their position.

They don't. Socialist countries are the most ethnically homogenous on the planet. It's capitalists who are calling for infinite jeet migration.

Get rid of the invaders and suddenly you need less services/workers.

why do we HAVE to have more people anyway?

Good people that are productive are demanded everywhere.

There is no such thing as a non-capitalist framework because capitalism is inevitable in a sexually reproducing species. Sex is based off a relative standard and thus necessitates competition.

state capitalism

free market capitalism

welfare capitalism

crony capitalism

etc capitalism

If you need to add a "capitalism" suffix to everything then it's redundant. You may as well just say

states

free markets

welfare

cronies

etc

All the redundant "capitalism" suffix does is say that things are not magical, but magic isn't real so who cares?

Exactly. Fascism is the solution.

I have 84 different holiday homes

In Europe we have to live in communist tower blocks its that crowded.
When muslims set the special energy saving cladding on fire, the advice is just to wait patiently in your flat until the authorities come. Presuming they come.

grenfell.jpg - 968x681, 64.82K

You can't afford a house because of lack of government funding and restrictions. Not because of a brown person moving in down the steeet

they know, they are doing it on purpose

If they weren't evil faggots they would only allow female immigration.

see

It would be. Migrants create more crime and slums. You know this is true.

brown person

oxymoron

There's a built in problem of too many old people living longer and not working with too few children being born

Houses would be much cheaper at least.
Right now the elites have made it so a lot of people cant afford their own home.

Paid for by US tax dollars and there is a mass exodus leaving Isreal.

migration is not a solution to fertility?

but it is. they have tons of kids.

If they wanted more white children there would be more support to raise children.
There isn't

that only lasts a few generations, the fertility crisis affects them too

Oh, I thought this was relating to the US. My bad. Sorry for you folks

looks up homes and property for sale in England.

Oh this is bullshit too.

Socialist countries

He didn't say "socialist countries", he said "socialists".

It's capitalists who are calling for infinite jeet migration.

Every socialist organization in the anglo/euro world is in favor of open borders and mass migration. If I go to the webside of DSA etc, I guarantee that they will be pro-migration. It's always socialists sending thugs to intimidate people who are critical of open borders and mass migration, not the rich. Mass migration benefits the rich, but socialists are the ones fighting for it. This is precisely why we call them "useful idiots".

And socialist countries were pushing mass migration. Russia spent billions every year promoting mass migration in US-aligned countries. Just because they weren't pushing it at home doesn't mean they weren't pushing it in the US. You typically use weapons on the other side, not your own side. Saying socialist countries weren't pushing mass migration because they didn't inflict it on themselves is like saying the US never used nuclear bombs because they didn't drop them on their own cities.

Also, why do we HAVE to have more people anyway?

To keep wages low. This is often an explicitly stated goal of replacement migration; if you won't produce enough children to suppress wages, they'll import people to suppress wages.

Anyway none of our politicians care about the long-term consequences, brown people don't exist in gated suburbs, many of our (((elites))) feel no ethnic bond with us anyway, and those who do just won't consider putting up with a few less million a year so the plebs can have better lives. As long as they can make it through retirement, anything after that is someone else's problem; although in practice anything after the next quarterly shareholder meeting is someone else's problem.

The decline is starting to affect them. I think the DC airport collision is an example of lowered non-White standards and DC airport is where the elite children fly out of so it should matter. But even then they won't consider changing anything in a significant way, they'll just keep pushing the same narratives publicly while privately withdrawing from any industry or institution they know to be sabotaged. They're all looting, they all know it, but none of them is going to take the risk of trying to fix it.

It's sort of a mistake to describe these people as elites. When you look at the behavior of the organizations they run it's not really that different from the kind of short-sighted behavior you might find in the individual life of a druggie or a minimum wage worker. They're still just human.

How are we going to deal with this crisis? The elite are holding course in public and building bunkers in private. Seems like the plan is no plan.

We dont have a "lack of housing" problem though.

sWaRcssssss???

usafacts.org/articles/how-many-vacant-homes-are-there-in-the-us/
apnews.com/article/housing-home-sales-real-estate-home-prices-6b0a5692ad279ee25f106fde04656713

tldr: ~15,000,000 vacant homes in america. Homes ready to be bought, with no buyers. The number has increased by 100,000 in the past year. Comparison, there is 800,000 known homeless in America.

We also do not have a lack of affordable homes, as american homes are already being built by migrant slaves using paper mache.

citation: multple webms on Anon Babble of poor american housing. Search 4plebs for more details.

What we have is people not being able to afford the housing that is available.

This actually doesnt make sense to me how that is possible, free market economies etc, so im left to assume its artifical pricing by banks/whales to keep afloat boomer assests.

This. Sad how this post goes unnoticed. It's just like Jeff Bezos explained in an interview on why he likes a diverse workforce: they're harder to organize into unions. Fuck Unions as well, they're highly prone to their own form of corruption and flavor of jewery, but the point is, according to western liberalism, you don't have to take care of your people, just replace them. If they complain? Call them racist and pit their new "neighbors" against them. Boom, profit, now everyone's fighting each other. Aristotle spoke of this millennia ago. Modern western liberal countries are ruled over by tyrants who seek to use the foreigner to demographically dilute, and economically and politically disenfranchise their political rivals. We're ruled over, and normies think there's a happy ending for them if they shill for a side hard enough.

just import more

stupid simp cracker faggot

IMG_7200.jpg - 500x562, 71.38K

white boi swede still thinks it is about economy

Barbara.png - 1200x694, 1.05M

You and I are being intentionally exterminated by the design of a Zionist Occupation Government, because Jews hate Whites and want them exterminated. They accomplish this by total control of Central Banking in most countries allowing them to use infinite funds to buy all politicians through Zionist lobbying groups like AIPAC, and buying all News Organizations so none of this is properly reported, and controlling all entertainment media companies to create endless anti-White demoralization propaganda to make Whites hate themselves and more likely to support their own destruction. These self-hating Whites are called Leftists, and they are the only group that hates their own race. They are suffering from a mental illness characterized by pathological altruism towards outgroups and contempt or hatred toward their own ingroup.

Occupation.jpg - 1024x367, 100.2K

Birthrates of non-whites in western countries are cratering too. They're cratering even in the migrants' countries of origin. It's some nice silver lining.

If I could turn back time,
If I could find a wayyy

As a politician, why would I wait ~18 years and spend money on tax payer subsidized programs that I wont be able to steal while making my life harder by employing more people with expensive things like wages that match to the local market and citizenship/workers rights? I can steal more tax payer money if I bring in the cheap slave labor instead.

consider the following:

IMG_6333.png - 206x278, 19.57K

Only causes deflated wages and increased burden on social services (tax burden put upon the native population) so natives are just taxed more and earn less.

It's about tax burden versus tax consumer
White men are taxed the most and foreigners consume more tax benefits. This is basic public policy. Taxing something results in less of that thing. Subsidizing something results in more of that thing.

They understand. It's divide and conquer. A homogenous society built around a centralized framework of ancient morals is immune to tyranny because they band together to overthrow their would-be oppressors immediately. They naturally recognize the threat and instantly reject whatever pretense of authority it claims because they all understand that the authority to rule arises only from within the community and their ancient traditions. So the tyrant is motivated to dilute the population with strangers who share different morals and customs. A population will never rise against the tyrant because the men will never form the requisite trust needed to form militia. And the tyrant will always be able to make the population fight by promising one group some meaningless bullshit that pisses off the other groups. This is partly why the LGBT alphabet grows every year to LGBTQQI2AO+ because the further you can break down rhe population into smaller and smaller units the better.

Tldr in a homogenous society your politics aligns with your policy positions and practical needs. In a heterogeneous society your politics aligns with your race and religion.

its capitalism and globalism dumbass no conspiracy required.

How about breeding stables?

They understand. It's divide and conquer. A homogenous society built around a centralized framework of ancient morals is immune to tyranny because they band together to overthrow their would-be oppressors immediately.

This is why everything in western societies are so anti-natalist, anti-family, and pro-Feminism (inherently anti-family). Everything to destroy or hamstring the development of large, stable families, the one thing that put government in check. A diverse and atomized people are far easier to rule over and abuse.

In a homogenous society, democracy is a competition of ideas. In a heterogenous society, democracy is a demographic headcount.

To keep wages low.

Again, this cannot be the primary reason. The profit motive favors outsourcing over immigration. How does it make any sense to move all the workers into the countries with the highest minimum wage, the most stringent workplace safety laws etc? That's just going to make labor even more expensive. If the purpose of browns was cheap labor then the elite would keep them in brown countries to circumvent minimum wage laws, workplace safety laws etc.

Mass migration is driven by hatred of whites. It's that simple. All of the architects will tell you that. There are entire libraries worth of academic literature produced by the architects telling you their motives. Some of these architects are socialists, some of them are market liberals, some of them are jewish ethnonationalists, some of them are islamists. They are not united by their "isms", they are united by their hatred of whites.

Hitler shot himself through the mouth to the back of his head , not sideways at the skull.

And yet even the most atheist urbanized Ashkenazi has a replacement birth rate in israel.

Despite what commies and retards will tell you this has literally nothing to do with capitalism and has existed for as long as the concept of a nation and government have existed.
The Elites will ALWAYS bring in loyal outsiders because they work for less, accept worse conditions, and as said prior are loyal.

This doesn't nessisarily have to be another race either, look at what's happening to Texas for instance where they are becoming California 2 by shipping in half of California and New York into the state. A lot of these people are white but they are still outsiders to the state.
Roman's did this, Greeks did it, all nations have done this, and it generally always causes things to get worse for the average man.

I like that India's looks like a huge never-ending turd. How poignant.

this.
If you still think (((they're))) still motivated by profit, then you're a gullible goy.

They already have infinite money through their control of the banks that make up the Federal Reserve, the Federal Reserve itself, buying all the politicians through AIPAC and all the media companies in any position to change this setup or even credibly complain/report it. They have accomplished this coup in ever Western country, starting with the Dutch Republic and then Great Britain, France, and America. The Germans fought it and were annihilated and literally occupied.

Profit is not the motive.

indeed THE most important question never asked. why do we need to maintain or grow population size, when animals adapt to crisis and abundance in exactly the same way as we do. we'd be happy at 3 billion people, which it was when i went to school. we'd be happy at the much discussed 500 million. then why do we need brown migrants. we all know the answer. then why do they get away with this nonsense?

Fertility has nothing to do with lack of housing. The vast majority of kids are unwanted (yes, you inclded anon). Ban birth control or import niggers to dumb to use it or mulsims fearing God.

blackrock owns a lot of rental property here and it's not exactly a benefit to the tenents. i'd love for them to piss off, and all other usuruy as well please.

feritlity

anon when a civilization produces abundance, it growth until it saturates every pathway to resources, spaces, opportunities and prospects. at that point, the civilization has to diminish or face crises until collpase.

diminishing means that the elites have to begin a war among themselves to see who gets to stay at the top and who gets crushed and yeeted down the ladder.
but the current elites are weak and soft due to the exceptional cushy and long peace period; they want to continue living their principesques lives, and they prefer to take the easy route. in order to do so they want thing to not excalate to violence level and mainly use deceit and bribes to move around. they need a little magic circle of "supporters". the bigger is the amount of benefits they can provide to the little circle, the more numerous and loyal support they can get, so the chance of the elite to stay at the top.

enter the immigrant:
the immigrant is willing to work for much less and care extremely less for that thing called human rights, furthermore, it is racist, and he cares not about the natives of the country and is willing to inflict suffering upon them than your average native would never be able to.

the difference spared of paying the immigrant cheaply are funneled to the inner circle, furthermore, the immigrants defend the elite that allow him to stay, providing the elite his tiny private cheap army.

1/2

As this change is introduced in the civilization everybody is forced to resort to cheap migrants more and more to stay competitive, it trickle down and affect society, the people most affected complains, but the elite and their benefitting minions can't give up their scheme, they insult and slander their people and seek to destroy every value of society that hinders their plans, such as family, patriotsm, etc. but these values are also the same value that keep society glued together, by destroying them you expose the civilization to the assault and take over from an another civilization

yet there is a solution; if the same process I describe above happens everywhere at the same time and is global, then elites have not to worry about other countries because the elites of those other countries are actually on the same boat as them. all they have to do is agree on which place where they can get new migrants for the next cycle, and this is what we called globohomo

in short, if for the elite to stay in power, he has to create a world where you live so shitty and so soulcrushing you cannot even make a family, the elite does not care. and this is why we say they want to genocide you.
why they do so? they believe they can actually pull this off and keep being in charge. so figure.

2/2

styrofoam on fire. and all houses around here are clad with this shit. normal people wouldn't hold a lighter to it, but someone could. don't worry though, if you're bame the good people from adjacent better areas will donate for the funerals. and talk about it.

Well you can't talk too much about that because if you type the word "union" that codes as lefty and Anon Babble still has sidebrain.

styrofoam on fire. and all houses around here are clad with this shit

When they got burned to death in their homes at least they were happy that they saved some CO2 with the special cladding.

Years ago in the UK some local unions were picketing job sites that didnt speak English and stuff like that.
But the top union leadership who are ultra wealthy were like 'noooo you have to be replaced by foreigners'.

Good luck convincing the boomers to sacrifice themselves for the good of the young.

/thread

If your "union" boss spends too much time talking to the management eventually he becomes management. Sad! Many such cases.

This actually doesnt make sense to me how that is possible, free market economies etc

Because "housing" isn't a real thing. There is no demand for "housing", what there is demand for it housing with a bunch of additional qualifiers that everyone likes to omit. For example housing within 30 minute drive from Manhattan. There may not be a "housing" shortage, but there is absolutely a "housing within 30 minute drive from Manhattan" shortage.

The reason markets don't work for housing like they do for most other producible goods is that the value of housing comes from location and the supply of land in any particular location is fixed. Markets work well when supply can vary in response to variations in demand, but when supply is fixed people start treating it as an investment vehicle rather than a usable good.

Markets are necessary when supply can vary.
Planning is necessary when supply is fixed.
The USA has constant housing crises but never has food shortages because they use markets everywhere.
The USSR had constant food shortages but never had housing crises because they used planning everywhere.
If you want a society without housing crises or food shortages then you need to use markets for food and planning for housing.
If you want to create a maximally dysfunctional society for the lulz then you use planning for food and markets for housing.

You can also see this dynamic at play in total war scenarios, where food etc goes from being allocated via market to being allocated via rationing. If you are under siege then no new food can get in, so from the perspective of people inside the walls food is now a fixed supply good. Planning is optimal when the supply is fixed so a society under siege shifts from markets to rationing in response. Once the siege has been lifted, rationing also stops because the food supply is now free to vary against and markets are better than planning when supply can vary.

Immigrants into the West are primarily used for jobs that can't be outsourced for one reason or another. You can't build a house in Texas with labor that's living in China, it's just impossible. But you can build a house in Texas with illegal Mexicans who came over the border into Texas and accept less than minimum wage. That way you get your low wage even at home. This is exactly how Californians use illegal immigrants as well, just to get ahead of sidebrain on this, all industry loves slaves and will always use them where available.

Everything that can be fully outsourced had been already by the 2010s.

I'm sure that many of our elites do hate/fear White people, but keep in mind; if Biden's White House staff was 41% Jewish, yes that's well out of proportion for Jewish population, but it also means his White House was 59% helpful goyim, including Biden himself. The same holds true everywhere else. Jews show up in abnormally high numbers in every elite profession and they are at least matched in every such profession by goyim, often White, often nominally Christian, who happen to have all the same values and act in exactly the same ways.

We use the high proportions of Jews in all these parasite fields to pretend that parasitism is an exclusively Jewish problem even though many of our own practice the same tactics. This is to avoid the psychological burden of recognizing the Jewishness of our own spirit. You get the Jews you deserve.

This problem solves itself by just not importing migrants and lettting nature take care of itself:

less people means less workers

demand for labor rises

business owners pay higher wages to attract workers

wages are able to support new families

more workers and prosperity in the end

There's no "fertility crisis" Old people and big business just want cheap free wagies to sustain their lavish lifestyles and attempts to live forever.
Mass migration should've never been allowed and doesn't even solve the problem, all it does is divide and conquer the population and as a temporary stopgap.
Old people should be subordinated and embrace their twilight years naturally as that is expected of them and allow younger people in their prime to direct where society goes, they should only advice, not dictate.

why do we HAVE to have more people anyway?

jews
read: They need more slaves for the line to forever go up, otherwise interest won't be pay'd, and you LOVE to pay interest to kikes, right?
RIGHT?

it has proven to drive up cost. installation first, then the need arises to air out the place or get mold, cause now walls can't brreef. airing lowers temperature, inside humidity level needs heating. nobody has saved anything on this. it was a huge jew scam from the start. keep business going, get huge contracts for companies you own. demand any price when you're blackrock. picrel zeitgeist cycnicism.

grenfell.jpg - 1600x900, 156.46K

Based and Georgepilled.

BYGEORGE.png - 680x709, 357.95K

Why don't politicians understand

Don't make the mistake of thinking they believe their own lies.

Don't make the mistake of believing they don't either.
They ain't smart people for the most, quite emotional too.

You know the worst thing about this? Reading about what happened AFTER the Black Plague in Europe. After the plague killed off a lot of the old and sick, there was an economic boom. Suddenly there was more wealth, land, and opportunity available for the younger generations to inherit. This helped spur the now famous Renaissance Age, the European golden age that we're still benefiting from today. If post WW2 Boomers weren't such greedy, jewish-led retards, then we'd be on the verge of another golden age, or mini one at least. Boomers would naturally croak, resulting in one of, if not the largest, transfers of generational wealth and opportunity in human history.

Instead, they chose 2nd or 3rd homes, remortgaging their homes, selling out their businesses to China, and importing the rest of the world to keep their capitalism numbers going up. People do not hate Boomers enough. All we needed were a couple caretaker generations to see them out. Instead greed won. I'm sure informed Canadians know what I'm talking about. Their boomers up there on most of the real estate market, and for them, the mass influx of immigrants is wonderful because it drives up the value of their assets (as well as cheap labor). Their youth be damned. Boomers are Saturn incarnate.

Capitalism

It's literally the pyramid scheme of retirement. It only works if population grows quadratically... it's a scam originated by the baby boom.

To expect population to endlessly keep doubling every 20-30 years is fucking retarded. This is not an anti-natalist sentiment... it's anti-mind-numbing-retardation... even if Earth can sustain a larger number of people, you eventually reach that number and it'd only be a bigger mass scale extinction event.

retard

business owners pay higher wages to attract workers

Well this is the issue in a nutshell, they don't want to do that. Business owners love the free market until the invisible hand decides it's their turn to lose and then suddenly they want government intervention.

It's the same reason nobody on Wall Street refused the bailouts in 2008. Probably every person on every board and every CEO had at some point espoused their love for the free market. But when it was time for them to be the loser in what I think is undeniably an instance where the free market should force a loss; people selling bad debt and people buying bad debt without due diligence; not a single one refused the bailouts on principle. They all said

yes please we'll take the socialism

Nobody said

No thank you, the invisible hand has decreed we go out of business and so we shall.

The game doesn't work if you redact any outcome you don't personally like.

To reconstitute ethnocultural nation-states as corporate nation-states instead

Corporations like Google and Amazon are building campuses that in-
creasingly look like autonomous mini-states, with their own infrastruc-
ture, retail, social services and even shelters for the homeless. Google also
announced a billion-dollar housing investment plan in the San Francisco
area, directly intervening in urban planning at a time when states are in-
creasingly unable to guarantee their citizens’ right to affordable housing.
archive.is/0uwgA

A politician's primary job in modern day DC is fundraising, getting enough money to get re-elected, which doesn't require an in-depth knowledge of law and policy. We know for sure that the majority never read the laws they sign. The laws are too long, the deadlines too short. How are they making the decisions then? Vibes? Orders?

i do hope the generations after you will think in the same way. 'all we need for a boom is a forced redistribution of wealth by killing the old.' you won't be old. not that it's particularly nice. think about it though, with an opinion like yours, boomers would be forced to defend themselves from you. preventively. good luck, m8, with times to come.

This is actually the main point. You will be too busy and exhausted from fighting the immigrants one way or another to pick a fight with old money elites that own more and more and that brought them there.

This is where coorporate leftist logic falls apart. You can't be pro unions and workers rights and pro migration.
And no you are not gonna convince an Indian that works whole day for 3 bowls of rice in his homeland to join you in fight against the rich that brought him there.

It is also visible how they pick the most incompatible immigrants on purpose to cause conflict.
For example in Europe they picked the worst of the worst.

Retard. It's called the older generations help prepare and secure a future for their children and grandchildren, not sell it out to Jews or the rest of the world. You're the one who immediately thought of mass-snuffing, not me. Right now, the current model of western liberal prosperity is:

Why invest in our own people's future? Why even HAVE a people or a future? Just replace them, it's cheaper!

That's not a successful society, that's a failed society. A successful society is one that secures a future for itself and its people, not flush it down the toilet to make stock market numbers go up.

Because the 'people' that rule over us are evil retards who only care about lining their pockets and couldn't care less about the constituents they are suppsed to represent.

Old people should be subordinated and embrace their twilight years naturally as that is expected of them and allow younger people in their prime to direct where society goes, they should only advice, not dictate.

Except this generation of old people is filled with narcissistic subhumans.
And Yes off course a younger person should decide where society goes.Or at least should have a bigger say than someone who will live 10 more years.
Old poeple should get half of a vote at best.

Also, why do we HAVE to have more people anyway?

Line must go up.
That's what's funny about leftists shilling for mass immigration, the entire justification for mass immigration is that it's good for GDP and the stock market. Nevermind that it fucks over everyday workers.

Housing is also affected by the flip side of globalism. Globalism is not a one-way street. If people are expected to immigrate to your country in search of a better life then you will also be expected to emigrate from your country in search of a better life.

In a nationalist USA the system has failed if the average american worker cannot afford the average american house.
In a globalist USA the system has failed if the average american worker cannot afford the average global house.

The average global house is not in the USA, it's somewhere like indonesia, brazil etc. The average american worker can afford these houses, so from a globalist perspective there is no housing crisis. The very concept of a housing crisis is something that only makes sense from a nationalist perspective, because it assumes that people should have access to housing within their own nation/state/country as opposed to just having access to housing anywhere. This is a huge part of why the modern left doesn't resonate with the working class. Most working class people know they can easily afford a house if they move to a poorer country, so they must adopt a nationalist perspective in order to recognize the existence of a housing crisis. The left encourages violence against nationalists, therefore the left encourages violence against anyone who acknowledges the existence of a housing crisis. The only reason many naive college leftists feel safe believing in a housing crisis is because they haven't thought about it hard enough to understand how this belief implicitly makes one a nationalist. Once it finally clicks they will start getting scared of their own side. They will start seeing antifa violence etc and putting themselves in the shoes of the victim rather than the perpetrator, and so begins the perennial trend of today's left becoming tomorrow's right.

Boomers are so narcisistic they would plunge the world in to dark age rather than let younger poeple out do them.

Imagine if all that investment didn't go to housing a usles artificially scarce asset but in some productive industry buissness ,idea etc.
We would be in almost post scarcity.

You dont need to centrally plan housing . You just need to allow poeple to build whatever they want and not allow poeple to hoard land.Make it so you can own 3 houses of land tops.
Also ban coorporations from owning land.

It would seem insane except that parents love their children. Among the Inuit, if a blizzard went on too long and the food started getting low, the oldest man would often stand up, put on his furs, grab his spear and say

I'm going hunting

and leave. On a rare occasion he might come back with a seal, but usually he would perish. Just as well, one less mouth to feed. Why did he completely subvert his own self-interest that way? He loves his kids and his grandkids. His self-interest lies in them, not himself.

And the thing is the boomers wouldn't even have to do anything that drastic, they'd just have to downgrade their living standards. The idea of a retirement where you live in just as much luxury as when you were working was historically just for the very wealthiest people, it's only in the mid 20th century that it suddenly became something for plebs too. Prior to that you survived retirement (i.e. no longer being able to work) by moving in with your kids and reducing your standard of living to poverty levels. Unless you could work into old age and then you'd just work until you died.

Boomers could've set up their children to be masters of the Earth and then we could probably afford to pay for infinity Social Security/Medicare/pensions, but they didn't do that already, so what they could do now is just take less so their kids can live their lives. Move in and live in a sideroom, do babysitting, if you're grandpa do home repairs around the house, don't have any expensive hobbies or take so many vacations, maybe work part-time if you can. Still much better than dying in a Hooverville the way plenty of our ancestors did.

I am of course aware boomers will never do any of this.

That's the kneejerk since every boomer is vaguely aware that if the youth understood the real situation, generational war would immediately be on the table.

so you're a divide and conquer one, who goes ad hom immediately. i get it. well, if you don't want to act on what you perceive as a problem then why complain? about something that isn't even true. why don't you buy a second and third home and rent them out? economy, eh. now who's to blame for unlimited money supply to a few chosen ones. boomers, i'm sure. which boomers exactly are you complaining about? age range is broad. btw. the boomers i know, own three houses because they inherited houses from a better time. that makes a couple, the house they built and two more. what should they do with these houses? give em away?regardless of current money depreciation? to whom? you? i know you might be referring to US boomers. it's not like that everywhere. you are generalizing though.

jews are ushering in an age of diversity and multiculturalism (they say this themselves, but then when I say it it's considered "hate speech")

Ginger hate's rare on Anon Babble although a few seething brits are the exception, it seems

I think your brain is pickled.

capitalism is inevitable in a sexually reproducing species

Sex is based off a relative standard and thus necessitates competition

Women literally fuck retards at higher rates than geniuses. Women were a mistake.

Inuits would also decimate boomer generation.

The Yupik Eskimos use the term kunlangeta to describe a man who repeatedly lies, cheats, steals, and takes sexual advantage of women, according to a 1976 study by Jane M. Murphy, an anthropologist then at Harvard University. She asked an Eskimo what the group would typically do with a kunlangeta, and he replied, “Somebody would have pushed him off the ice when nobody else was looking.”

if you're not inheriting a house, that's just tough luck. you should have one yourself by the time your parents leave you one. if your parents sold out rather than supporting you, bad luck. you should still make it yourself. pickled. lol. fuck off

Need to uphold boomer voterbase

nice bait 2/10

They understand, they want whites extinct is all because we lost ww2 and Jews control the entire planet and all white countries and hate us with every fibre of our being and boomers think they are our friends

Also, why do we HAVE to have more people anyway?

Well in my perfect world, we would zerg the other races.
We would shit out kids and expand our great empire outwards, conquering new lands for our surplus of people.

Alas, we some retarded greeeedy elites, that want money.
I hope when they die they bury them with their money and let all the niggers know.

kiketalism says we should work and get rich

spare money goes to investment funds

investment funds due to competition migrate to sectors such as housing, food, health and education

cost of living gets expensive

workers who want a comfortable life choose not to have children

kiketalism decides to import immigrants to keep the coomsuming wheel turning

makes you wonder...

Make it so you can own 3 houses of land tops

Also ban coorporations from owning land.

When I say planning I'm including stuff like this under that label.

Some asian countries have a system where only citizens can own land. Foreigners (including multinational corporations) cannot own land and must rent from citizens. It seems to be quite effective at reducing speculative hoarding while not requiring citizens to sacrifice any rights at all. Of course if you live in the same country as all the speculative hoarders then you might need additional measures which might infringe upon the rights of citizens somewhat.

Make it so you can own 3 houses of land tops.

This has the issue of subjective measurement. How big is a house? How long is a piece of string? Etc. Any regulation of this kind would need a more objective way of measuring things. Something like land area etc would work better, but still has issues. For example a farmer would be incorrectly flagged as a hoarder under this system. You would need some way of allowing farmers to own large plots of land for work without creating loopholes that allow speculators to masquerade as farmers in order to buy up all the houses. Maybe just do what china does and designate some cities as "special economic zones". Land ownership in these cities (mostly living space) can be limited to X per individual or whatever, but land ownership outside these cities (mostly farmland, industrial sites etc) can continue as a mostly free market.

Not only that, but once our genetics are ruined by subhuman nigger and primative brown genes, there is no coming back from that (well maybe in ~500,000 years of evolution we will be back to being white again). We will no longer be able to achieve a white civilization anymore once we are niggerized, only what is possible with inferior nigger and mongrel-white intelligence levels.

sounds good, but so did other utopian plans for the greater good. you are proposing to limit wealth. whose wealth is the question. it's not boomers who own blackrock. blackrock owns the homes of many many people who can now only rent. boomers renting out their inherited family homes isn't even a thing here, because as the other anon so well explained, it's about location. i know several who are trying to sell at reasonable prices and there's just no interest.

I miss Adolf bros but I don't think we are going to see him reincarnate in our lifetime... :(

None of this is possible in absence of a government that represents its people. Property ownership is only a small slice - our infrastructure and primary industry (what’s left of it) is owned by multinationals and foreign billionaires. It’s usually African countries that allow their sovereign assets to be plundered like this

How long did that post stay up on plebbit before being taken down for hate speech and racism?

Usually these are posted on r*ddit with a disclaimer something like: "look how AWFUL this meme is! WHO WOULD MAKE THIS?! I'm literally shaking right now"

an exceptional man he may have been, the outcome of him trying what he claimed to be trying, was devestating. would he be a net positive a second time around? did he ever have a chance? would there be one now?

Politicians understand that incredibly well. They're not stupid, they're evil. They prey on the misplaced goodwill of their stupid people to convince them to vote and fight for their own replacement. A diverse population is easier to control since it's harder for them to unite.

Women literally fuck retards at higher rates than geniuses.

Sure, but as long as some people are getting more than others, there will be competition that selects for selfish behavior. Even if women were property and had no choice, there would still be capitalism as men will still compete with other men to monopolize access to women and this competition will still be a zero-sum game.

Sex is so tightly coupled to social organization that you can reliably predict how a species will organize based purely on its reproductive strategy, and you can reliably predict how cooperative/competitive a human society is based on how monogamous/polygamous they are. For example almost all eusocial animals share a reproductive quirk whereby they have more DNA in common with their siblings than with their own offspring. This is what makes them so cooperative.

An ant/bee/wasp/etc is ~75% related to a sibling and ~50% related to a child.
A human is ~50% related to a sibling and ~50% related to a child.
This is why ants are so much more cooperative than humans. It has nothing to do with socioeconomic factors, it's purely down to reproductive biology. Monogamy lies somewhere in between eusociality and polygyny in terms of sibling relatedness vs offspring relatedness, which is societies typically become more warlike or capitalistic the more polygynous they become.

why do we HAVE to have more people anyway?

Who else is going to pay for all the boomer pensions and social security? Did you think they saved and invested the money they put into it or something?

Jews are only able to operate within a capitalist framework.

They thrive the most under communism actually. Communism was invented by a jew

Because capitalism died in 1971. Heil kikepitalism!

Governments and benefits are a fucking pyramid scheme and they must always grow or they will collapse.

would he be a net positive a second time around?

if he achieved his goals the first time or if someone similar achieved them in the future it would be an overwhelming net positive for the human race

did he ever have a chance?

He did, but that's not a reason for why you should or shouldn't try something and he knew that.

would there be one now?

Using anti immigration as a start would be a very easy way to start. The goal of national socialists wasn't genocide either if that's what you're talking about

less labor

more demand

labor is more valuable

labor compensation in turn increases

The only downside to this is the potential for work to be "harder". I don't think anyone would mind hard work if an average job allowed you to buy a house, keep your wife from working, and allow you to comfortably raise multiple children.

Using anti immigration as a start would be a very easy way to start.

This is redundant and retarded I need to get off Anon Babble and get coffee

being a parasite isn't productive. pissrael is a parasite and should be dealt with as such.

I recognize this british flag who does jewish pilpul to deflect attention away from jewish crimes and gaslight us. I wonder if this is a jew living in the UK, or a paki

Everybody knows animals struggle to breed in captivity. As it turns out, humans struggle to breed in captivity too. Make of this what you will.

This is why democracy leads to tyranny.

TRVTH NVKE

The only potential upside of mass migration is the creation of a permanently exploitable underclass to do the menial jobs and subsidize our make-work jobs sustaining our individual lifestyles. If we got rid of them all, those menial jobs would have to pay more. There would be mass labor shortage and we'd have to trim the fat of make-work useless jobs and get people into actually productive employment. If you told me I could have a piss easy make-work job that paid enough for me on my own to live in an apartment, or I'd be out in the fields picking fruit and it gave me enough to buy a house, I'd take the harder job any day. Only problem now is that work pays fuck all BECAUSE of the migrant class.

This is why unironically we need to bring back slavery. Its the only way

Broooo fuck your save the white race, nazi bullshit cringe shit. Go and get a vasectomy this shit is not salvageable. It's over. Don't make kids, don't worry about this bullshit anymore and go live whatever is left of your pathetic life

they understand, they're doing it on purpose. embrace neetdom util gibs dry out for the shitskins and they chimp out

hell no, not talking about genocide and i'm aware it would be a net positive when successful. i meant that he was forced into the destructive part and that it would be similar now for as long as the golem are corrupt and the means of corruption in the hands of evil. i don't see a way out of this via fake democracy.

I mean, it's not too far off of what these people that support mass immigration want. The only reason why you're able to sit back and relax at your bullshit HR job is because we have a permanent underclass of fresh meat to do the menial labor for you. They pick the fruit for pennies so you don't have to for dollars. If we kicked em all out, we'd have to do it ourselves and these bullshit jobs would have to be trimmed down to a bare functional minimum. The amount of admins in hospitals compared to actual doctors and other practitioners of medicine is obscene. If we got rid of all of these people, we'd be out in the fields working hard. The only difference is these jobs would actually pay more. All this nation destroying immigration just so we don't have to do hard work.

Based and BAP-pilled

It is normal, sane, and rational for parents to sacrifice, even fatally, for their children. It is saturnian evil for parents to devour their children like out society is currently set up.

you can't have female higher education above 10% and a sustainable birthrate, it simply does not work no where in the world

it is not boutique issues like housing or something

Seventy percent of exploitation (getting paid less money than the value a worker produces) is directly the result of immigration. All profit is extracted from human labor and not constant capital. This is why we don't have robots, who don't eat food, live in houses, drive on the roads, put their children in schools, clog up the hospitals, have sexual emergencies, etc. It's capitalists who do this, for which jews constitute about 25% of the class, although as Marx said, "Judaism achieves universal dominance and make alienated man and alienated nature into alienable, vendible objects subjected to the slavery of egoistic need and to trading." and that these capitalists are in practice jews.
Habermasian thought flooded Europe with cheap replacement immigrants. In the United States, it was Friedman who set up the system we have. What is the solution? Marx wrote about this during the First International when capitalists tried to bring German shoemakers into Scotland.
1) Propagandize in the immigrants' home countries not to come under threat of violence.
2) If they do come, have them join the union under threat of violence.
3) If they refuse to join the union, burn their houses down.

hey faggot what is the birthrate of north korea?

Comparable with global trends, except they have programs to encourage replacement birth rates unlike in other countries. Juche is Korean Nationalist Socialism, they don't study or implement Marxist economics in the DPRK, and like the USSR did with the Red Mafia, they rely on criminals to make up for material shortages in their economy.

agree 100%, and that's what parents do. society hasn't been set up by boomers and boomers around me don't devour their children. must be american boomers then. or something entirely different that the boomer crap distracts from. who could say.

It seems obvious but nobody acknowledges it but humans need to feel comfortable and safe and with their own people in order to reproduce properly. Add even just a handful of niggers to a safe white community and now everyone is feeling unease and birthrates will plummet.

Do you want politics and companies to continue to be run by out of touch old farts? Make more babies to replace them.
There. I just gave you a reason why we need people that isn't purely beneficial to people you hate.