380

aero dynamics said air is going to lift 500 000 kilograms for no reason while flying animal max size is super fucking small despite hollow bones

nukes arent real tho bro

we will never be allowed to nuke our own species

Night shift at Eglin AFB?
Drink some coffee and watch some anime.

The safety margin is much closer in aviation.

i wanted to say op is gay
but op that would be a severe understatement he's an imbecile severe mentally retarded drooling idiot

A380 has massive wing. At maximum take off weight a square meter of the A380's wing needs to generate only 680kg of lift to get off the ground. That's not factoring lift generated by the body itself. 680kg of lift is nothing. F1 cars generate more.

why are you so mad? dont you pretend like you understand any of this, at best you would rehash stuff like a drone without ever questioning it of computing it in your head in how it could make sense

of course this necessitate a strong denial reaction in order to avoid looking under the carpet of your coping brain in the form of a deflection and insult

if you can believe in this, imagine in what else you could believe as long as a lot of people around you believe in it?

What is flexible deformation, the wings are not static, they bend through the force.
So some of the energy is temporarily deforming the wings.

It is 1.25 to 2.5.
I once visited a facility in Germany that build passenger planes.

Nice

Sorry, I should've read you post before replying. My bad

lol imagine dismissing common and somewhat mundane technology because of your overly simplistic understanding of the world.

This. Also planes are made from aluminum, which does not have an endurance limit. This means, that while strong, the structure is guaranteed to fail from cracking over the life of the plane. Now, this isn't really a problem, because you have to inspect the fuck out of aircraft. You fix the cracks. When the maintenance expense gets too much; you send the aircraft out to sit in the desert for spare parts.

yes the 500 tons plane only adds 2 tons to fight off gravity of course

now imagine the MOVING PARTS of the wing to go up, imagine the WEAKEST link of the chain, the SMALL ASS fucking moving parts taking TONS of air in the face and they dont break of course no problem

does boeing have an equivalent of this marvel?

you know what leverage does right?

The top "junction" is under compression. The bottom "junction" is under tension. Both "junctions" are designed with this in mind.
You should take a course in engineering. You're clearly interested in the subject.

what is flexible is less strong so they re even less strong

also if they bend they even have less power to prevent the plane from going down

if this shit weights 500 tons shouldnt these bitch flex like a motherfucker constantly? yet it doesnt ?

it just gets lost in magical "aerodynamics" which is your religion

Are you fucking retarded? You can go see a 380 fly, hell I’ve even seen the Antonov take off from an airport. Seeing isn’t believing now anymore for these retards

You know how fish (and you) can swim underwater.

Well, we live under air.

No. iirc boeing bet that the a380 was a bad design choice; that consumers would rather sit on smaller airplanes that get you closer to your destination. Boeing was correct; but they do have lots of other problems.

Reminder: planes are NOT real. They literally can’t stay in the air

im not interested in brainwashing. planes are fake and so is everytyhing else. you re ruled by psychopaths who have been studying the subjects for thousands of years and spend their free time torturing children and rebuilding a bunch of differnet bones together and tell you giant lizards walk the earth and you believe it because "muh science" depsite knowing nothing about it

you all roll with the plan without questyioning because such is your religion. i heckin love science

surely if the wing bends then these 2000 tons wings can tank 200 000 tons each no problem, on these small ass pieces of matter

they want you to believe that planes can fly because they can only fly in you believe in it

they channel your will power into their designs, they steal your power through "muh science"

Bro, don't let them know you know, they will van your ass.

i possess powers far beyond your understanding

I can explain it. Its conservation of momentium. Air 'weighs' ~1.23kg/m^3 at standard temperature and pressure. The shape of the wing, as it moves though the air creates a downwash. You take hundreds of tons of air per sec flowing over the wings, and you force it downward; that is lift. It also works out that the pressure is lower on top and higher on the bottom, and there is 'circulation' around the wing - but ignore that - it is all the same thing. Take huge amounts of air, and push it down, and it pushes you up - lift.

t. did aero related work for a lota years.

Apparently it generates enough lift to get in the air. If you don't believe me, go visit an airport and watch aircraft fly.

now imagine the MOVING PARTS of the wing to go up, imagine the WEAKEST link of the chain, the SMALL ASS fucking moving parts taking TONS of air in the face and they dont break of course no problem

Yeah, hydraulics can easily work through those forces and surprise surprise metal can handle some air pressure. The only challenge is to make alloys as light as possible while and industry has gotten really good at it. Just for your entertainment look up how jet engines blade are made. How much thoughts and work put into it.
Also keep in mind that of almost half of 600,000kg of maximum take off weight is fuel that is in the wings, engines are too suspended on the wings, good part of hydraulic systems is too inside the wings, which means there are much less stress on the joins as you think as wing basically lifts itself, while fuselage is relatively light. I wouldn't be surprised if standing on the ground is more stressful for an aircraft than being in a level flight.

you all roll with the plan without questyioning

I suggest reading this first, to clear up your fundamental confusion
pdfroom.com/books/the-trivium-the-liberal-arts-of-logic-grammar-and-rhetoric/DkgVeW9Qd9B
(it's a free download)
Then you can safely enroll in the engineering course you are CLEARLY interested in.

The air frame is made out of wood, the jet engine uses no fuel (where are the fuel lines?) Thats all.

wing basically lifts itself, while fuselage is relatively light.

heres the religious bullshit a zealous madman has to come up with to rationalize why these wings cant prevent a 500 tons plane from falling (for no reason) without having the wings breaks apart at the joints

500 000 tons start flying at 150 mph but 700 Kilograms F1 cars stay on the ground at 233 mph because muh wings

Wow. You should submit your report to the le scientisterino society. You will definitely get a Nobel prize for solving this problem that no one else has ever figured out.

i love how these zealots have to come up with nonsense like how light everything is, how empty and hollow, made of light materials, how incredibly light this 500 000 MOTHERFUCKING TONS plane is

Yeah they stay on the ground for the same exact reason as 500 ton aircraft lifts off. You're stupid nigger

Your right and planes are fake. When you get a plane they kill you and clone you at your destination with your memories

As others have noted; the structural strength of the wings is immense. This is a boeing test to failure of the wing of a 777.
youtube.com/watch?v=Ai2HmvAXcU0

for no reason

It isn't a secret, though the phd's love their circulation.

algerians btfo by physics

Show me a fucking duck doing 900km/h in the air, I will train them to suicide bomb themselves into you, like a reaper drone.

Actually they do flex on every flight and that is a known thing and they test for that shit, because if it was not flexing it would actually break.
Hell the wing can flex several meters at the tip on big passenger planes.

There is literally nothing that explains how planes stay in the air. No matter how much you think otherwise.

Yeah it doesn't make sense that this huge giant piece of metal is just floating through the air. We live in a simulation.

I wouldn't be surprused a yurotrash made this thread.

Actually F1 cars use the same principles as plane wings, but in reverse to generate pressure to keep them on the ground.

You can stick a wing in a windtunnel and measure it. Everything about it. Pressure distributions, airflow, etc. You can do CFD and match the experiments. None of that is easy to do correctly, but it all works out. No unknown physics here.

Engine vibration makes them lighter. They are almost like balloons when they land in high winds.

Nukes arent real.

We don't know why it works but it works. Some retards start making planes saw what was working and we keep perfecting it, that's how things were made in the past. Now, without publishing science papers, nothing is permitted, you would try to make a plane and you would end up in jail because planes are a conspiracy theory and pseudo science. The science says it can't work, it's obviously impossible and you would endanger yourself and others trying to build one. You know what works ? Hot air balloon.

That’s where you’re wrong, kiddo. You will probably have to repeat 9th grade physics next school year for your 3rd time as a 17 year old.
scientificamerican.com/video/no-one-can-explain-why-planes-stay-in-the-air/

we literally just copied birds

Safe and effective.

This. At top speed, an F1 car would drive on the ceiling.

look man, that article is clickbait. I skimmed it. There is no need to expect a simple explanation of the navier stokes equations; but there is no magic in them. You can derive them yourself. It all works out in the laboratory too. You can use simple cfd equations to compute the lift on all the naca airfoils, and then go stick them in a wind tunnel, measure static pressure distributions, all day long, take piv, hotwire, ldv measurements as much as you want, and it all works out. Been there, done that.

jew magic

Lift only accounts for less than 10% of the reason planes stay in the air. The rest is unknown. The science agrees with me.

ummm... no. Is the 90% in the room with you? Did it touch you? Can you show me on the doll?

if they flex like that the air goes away at the sides of the wings and lowers its gliding power

but somehow the 500 000 KG stay in the air because muh lift

yes it generates 300 tons of pressure which would crush the car but lifts the plane no problem i love science too

Where does all the fuel go too? There’s not enough room in the “wings” for the amount of fuel it says it burns on a flight.

I missed you retards so damn much; but lets not go full retard.

he thinks birds are real

Nobody tell him, this is funny.

the horizontal displacement generates 500 000 tons of vertical lift but somehow they can blast horizontally with their small fuel tanks without any air resistance because aerodynamics cancels physics despite the front not even being close to pointy and the fucking GLASS doesnt even break

It’s called science you goat fucking sub Saharan nigger.

>which means the pressure under the wings basically adds 400 tons of pressure constantly at the joints (the part between the wing and the fuselage)

do you also wonder why very tall skyscrapers dont just break down under their on weight? imagine all the weight from 100 floors lying on the very first floor. surely cant be engineering and good materials right?

i hope you are trolling

Except the 400 tons of lift are spread over the entire bottom surface of the plane, not just the wings. The wings just provide thrust. It nets that the main force acting on the joints between the wings and the fuselage is just the momentum of the wings

Nukes aren’t real

pulling something like a wing is extremely devastating mleverage wise, you can break very strong shit with leverage, its harder if it bends of course but once maximally bent you back to zero its much worse than a sky scraper that can add tons of material at the base at the sides so that the pressure also has to push laterally inside the foundations, here below the wing there is nothing to support it, triple digits tons on that small piece of shit for hours, more at take off

barely a small belly of material below the plane compared to a building in which you add ad much as you want to

and i doubt the "belly" below is flexible

it shouldnt even take off anyway. there is not hundreds of tons upwards lift its all fake

school dropout can't do basic math for material resistance and fluid dynamics

Many such cases

math

delusions, hallucinations. attempts to rationalize the incomprehensible. it is precisely because of your maths than this piece of shit shouldnt fly.

you just watch something happens and you try to fit the pieces after the fact. everything began with experimentation, maths is just an attempt so steal credit and pretend you were useful

math is true because math says so

zealous madmen all over the shop. you are one of them

If you guys want a real redpill, check out the data on jet fuel, namely - how much does a plane ACTUALLY need for a full flight.

In short - when you do the math on how much the fuel actually weights, and how much space it takes - you realize how big of a scam it is.

In other words - we pay (in flight ticket prices) for fuel that doesn't exist.

Here's a great video on the topic:
bitchute.com/video/2yKhfTkmr9Jg/

it doesnt need fuel, magical aerodynamics simply push the plane upwards, then you just fall and with the power of gliding on wings bent at 45° you just go forward forever

Seeing isn’t believing now anymore for these retards

You must be new here, so welcome to Anon Babble,

You know what's weird?
Jumbo jets are designed for sheer maximum passenger capacity, getting as many people as far and as cheaply as possible.
Fuel economy is part of that equation, and it's atrocious.
You see even though the jets have to be extremely, perfectly efficient, they strap 2-4 gas turbines under the wings, right in the way of good airflow, in the perfect spot to ruin efficiency.
Those turbines might seem efficient when you look at their figures, but look at the way they work. They slam into the air like a brick wall, and air is forced through little metaphorical cracks in the wall and compressed by a really big centripetal trash compactor.
The drag created by these apocalyptic pieces of shit is so immense, that the airframes they're strapped to can't reach transonic speeds despite the fact that they'd be more efficient, cheaper and faster if they did.
"But the sonic boom is annoying"? They already know how to eliminate it. Planes aren't allowed to go supersonic because if people can travel faster, they have more economic freedom, and the elites don't want that.

you know what leverage does right?

That's why wings taper towards the end.
It gives the further part of the wing less leverage over the joint.
This shit broke bi/triplanes all the time in WW1 and sweeping the wing back was the first attempt at figuring out how to deal with that. Then they figured out just the tip will do.

This is also a known issue, which is why wing design is its own field in science and every major plane builder and designer does research in reducing the loss of performance.
Yes because the F1 cars wings are the same size those of an airliner.
I cannot believe you are part of a big 3 nation.

You are probably a nignog living there larping as a french guy.

Tl;dr
It’s the jews again

you believe in 500 tons planes taking off because they go forward at 150mph we all have our problems

does that wing scientific field also study why f1 car speed lifts 500 tons for no reason?

same size

so the almost twice as fast stream of air gets spread over a small surface not even designed to be resistant or bend and everythings fine

There's 200km of range in making that nose Jewish

Nukes aren't real.

You know what is funny.
The engines we use on airliners have their sweet spot in fuel efficiency and speed and so on at 700km/h.
Yes we can build faster planes, but people don't like them, nut just because of sonic booms and the like.
For example passenger windows become a real structural issue so either omit them or make them small.
Guess what passengers don't like, no windows.
Many people already complain about the pressure on a normal flight, many also have physical issues with it.
That gets worse if you break the sound barrier.

why go at a hige speed if all that matters is air lift

make a slow ass vehicle with huge metal wings many times its sice and it ll start flying

If an orchestra of 80 people need 70 minutes play the 9th symphony, how long does an orchestra of 200 people need to play it.?

are you implying that faster speed doesnt cause more airstream thus more upward liftt according to your religion? why does your plane take off at 150mph instead of 3 mph then?

The concept is called "well poisoning."
Nukes aren't fake, just highly exaggerated in power. Space isn't fake, but some manned missions were (especially Apollo.)
Jews rape kids.

Exactly, which proves that you only need a fraction of the fuel that's supposedly tanked into those planes.

The more I learn about this shit the more I start to believe in the reality prison/matrix demiurge clusterfuck.

Wanna bet there'd be fewer issues if they made the whole frame a titanium monocoque?
It'd be difficult as fuck. As difficult as manufacturing a Jew out of the ashes of the holocaust. Prohibitively expensive and pointless, many engineers will say.
But look at it this way. Monocoque. No gaps. No windows, but a lot of passengers don't like the windows anyway, if scares them to look.
It'd be heavier, but again, it'll be tough and sturdy as fuck, safety rating easily at 14,88 instead of 2.
You can even go straight through the twin towers and fly out the other side unscathed.

We're just cattle for these people ain't we