HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
THE FUCKING MADLAD!!!!!!
Donald doesn't have zingers anymore, it's all reddit posting like pic related.
We literally pay so much to the Vatican. They can't make it on their own. Swiss guards in striped tights? Who's paying for that if we turn off the faucet. What I'm saying is there's NO reason why the Vatican can't keep their Swiss fags prancing like they like if they just become a new state. They know it. We know it. I have no idea if the Swiss fags know it but they don't matter.
Religious synthiziation with business
Babylonic bullshit in plain view
quad 6's
God, i get it, its clearly going to happen, and no, i don't think Trump is the antichrist or the false prophet, more than likely, they're both still waiting in the wings, the synthization is what is hinting that its coming and of course it would be coincidental with the fourth turning and lines up directly with what Ted said about technology, and of course kikes using the debt advice in deuteronomy would make the perfect conditions with their usury, because you knew that their greed would drive this system into necessity.
Religion continues to be ever obvious evidential proof of satan's existence, its the fact that people are delusional enough to believe that every single one of them is perfect by what they do rather than what they believe, and given the obvious overwhelming compatiblity of religion with the world, you can plainly tell that religion, which is the general idea of karma/beinggoodtogotoheaven is accepted literally anywhere and everywhere.
However, tell someone its by simply believing the gospel as a fact that means they're going to heaven because they believe it, and watch how they recoil like cain, accuse you, and if it were possible, would put you to death. The hour is late, grace runs completely juxtaposed to pride, and any who believe are not condemned, but those who do not believe are condemned already, for they have not believed on the only begotten Son of God.
Religion isn't what God is asking for, he's asking for your faith, it is not represented by what you do, your faith is represented by what Jesus did, in that you accept by what he did alone, means you are saved by what God has already achieved, and no one, no priest, pope, rabbi, demi, iman, angel nor demon, army, nor country can seperate you from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus.
"It is finished!"
based
If that's a real tweet, then his copium doses are being considerably increased and he's having a bad high.
unholy checked
This nigga really the Antichrist.
6666
Holy shit. The Antichrist has come.
it's real
I prayed for this.
Deuteronomy says that a man can't die for another man's sin. The amount of cope Christians have about whether Jesus was a man or not is crazier than trying to argue the trinity with them. They call him a sinless man but in the same breath tell you about his infinite magical powers. I'm not trying to hate on Jesus himself, because he just preached a simple Jewish message, but I am hating on everyone who claims to do stuff in his name.
Deuteronomy says that a man can't die for another man's sin.
John 10:18
stop talking about a book you clearly do not have any interest in actually reading. Why do you people insist on weighing in on something that clearly refutes what nay sayer say logically within scripture.
This is not suicide, its a sacrifice, the priests conspired to murder him under false charges, him allowing it is not suicide.
I don't accept quotes from the New Testament anymore than I would from the Book of Mormon. Deconstruct this article for me and I'll believe you.
jewsforjudaism.org
One of the cornerstones of Christian theology is that the only way to achieve atonement for sins is through the offering of a sacrifice whose blood is shed in our place. The Greek Testament makes this very clear in Hebrews 9:22 "...without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness." Is this idea consistent with the teachings of the Tanach, or do the Jewish and Christian bibles diverge on this issue? Christians generally insist that the absolute need for a vicarious blood sacrifice is rooted in the Torah, and cite as proof Leviticus 17:11 "For the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls; for it is the blood that makes an atonement for the soul." Are there differences between Christianity vs Judaism? Let's find out.
deconstruct this talmud inspired overtly exaggerated interpretation from someone who has already made up their mind
argue with me pointlessly over evidence that i won't consider because i don't accept the initial premise
its not a strawman,
atheism/agnosticism is epistemologically unsound.
Why would you assume the existence of evidence for something you do not believe in?
If you do not believe the evidence already provided in the book, what exactly do you think exists to affirm it already?
If you don't then you don't care if it exists or not, the decision was made a priori before the debate even occured and the resulting debate has little to do with whether or not its actually true, so bringing up evidence is a red herring, and is intentionally done to make rational skeptics look like they actually have a point, when the basis of the debate has already assumed one side doesn't believe, and because of that there is no reason to have a debate, evidence, no matter how convincing, can not override someones will to believe contrary to what it is suggesting, you are not a robot, and thusly, even objectivity or other metaphysical concepts pertaining to logic or truth also have little to do with the subject matter at that point.
Believe or don't, not my problem. not my responsibility, not my incentive, not dependent on me at all.
Everyone has faith, atheists are just contrarians because of religion, which acts like a strawman they can attack at anytime, as the people who subscribe to it slander God with every fuck up and false claim about what Jesus was talking about. Perfectly allowing Satan to hide behind religion, which is why Christians are not mass murdered in the west, and the latest incidents involving religious persecutions of people who simply believe was the middle ages of the catholic church inquisition, that burned people alive for attempting to understand it themselves. Final reply.
So fucking cringe
Trumps so cringe, him and miganiggers have set the stage for total dem victory in 2026 and a dem president in 2028, guaranteed.
I've read about 80% of the bible so far including the New Testament. Christians cower in fear from this article every time I post it. I'm giving you every opportunity here to debunk kikes forever for me. Tell me where the logic is flawed.
The true pope
so is it happening or wat nigger i aint readin dis shit
super satan digits
lol
I know abrahamic religions will die in about 600 years but this is a very fun way to see it die.
Abel and Cain
literally first fucking chapter of the book
clearly not only literal but also metaphorical allegory foretelling the dichotomy of two types of people
people of grace (Abel) who believe in the blood of the lamb
people of religion (Cain) who believe in their own merit
clearly in genesis the book is already condemning religion
somehow anon thinks that Jeremiah was a chapter devoted to inter religious conflict rather than God telling Israel that they’re being subverted by satanic idols that make them do things contrary to what God was asking for, when the sacrificial system itself was hinting that God was trying to get man to trust him, given that he literally asked Abraham to stop before he killed his own Son, then promised him that he would do it himself.
Yeah tell me where kikes accept that the blood of animals could never take away sin like Jeremiah and Isaiah clearly say about the blood of bulls. Meaning that the sacrificial system was priming Israel to understand why Jesus was going to do what he did. Kikes refuse to acknowledge the righteousness of God, and instead are obsessed with their own.
Jeremiah 17:5 is the death knell of religion in the Old Testament and it’s repeated several times by Paul and even James. The book has nothing to do with religion, and this is why apologists still manage to ass rape skeptics because the book is logically distancing itself from religion.
I'm personally voting blue down the line. Fuck this jewish cock sucker.
You got absolutely shitted on, kike anon.
Final reply
Read 8/10 instructions for final exam
Rush the exam
10th instruction says to turn test in blank and receive a 100
pontiff trumpman
wielding swords of flame and darkness
Those digits
Put me in the cap.
That guy is only interested in filibustering and not actually debating.
The article addresses your Christian narrative of the sacrificial system and debunks it. Shedding blood is not necessarily a prerequisite of the Old Testament.
According to the Christian narrative that only the shedding of blood can atone for sins, Jonah going to Nineveh and the people atoning without the shedding of blood, is completely impossible. Paul was just reinterpreting things for his own version of religion.
10th instruction says to turn test in blank and receive a 100
I've never been sure of what that trick test was for. The only time I've seen it useful was to read a contract in its entirety before you fill and sign.
he thinks turning from sins is what leads to forgiveness
Religion has completely subverted your understanding of the word ‘repent’. In Greek Koine, it actually is used in the context of changing your mind, Metanoia. It never had anything to do with what you do, in Jonah, them choosing not to sin leads to God choosing not to destroy them, that doesn’t mean they’re positionally forgiven, it simply means that God opted to not destroy them on the basis of their deeds, it is in no way what so ever a sign of forgiveness. God is simply giving them time to repent. Which isn’t represented by what you do. Jonah was told to go to them because if someone told them, they would do it. Not because God was going to do it anyway, the point is that even when Jonah was fighting God because of his own political views God was not going to allow Jonah to decide the fate of Nineveh when God is the judge.
The Christian claim that our sins can only be forgiven if blood is shed on our behalf also seems to limit the power of G-d. It's ludicrous to say that G-d`s ability to forgive us is dependent on anything. One of the most basic teachings in the Bible is that since G-d is merciful, He often forgives us simply because He is merciful. "Who is a G-d like You, who pardons iniquity and passes over the rebellious act of the remnant of His possession? He does not retain His anger forever, because He delights in unchanging love." (Micah 7:18; cf.Psalm 103:7-18). Even when we don't seek G-d appropriately, He has the ability to reach out to us with love and forgive us:
"Their heart was not steadfast toward Him, nor were they faithful in His covenant. But He, being compassionate, forgave their iniquity...remembering that they were but flesh." (Psalms 78:36-39)
"You have not brought Me the sheep of your burnt offerings...or the fat of your sacrifices, but you have burdened Me with your sins...Nevertheless, I will wipe out your transgressions for My own sake, and I will not remember your sins." (Isaiah 43:23-25)
limits God
two covenants
using the idea that God cannot change nor has favorites to try and make it sound like the New Testament contradicts the old
You don’t believe in the God of the Old Testament, so exactly how would you go about interpreting it otherwise? The other anon is blatantly correct, you’re full of shit. There was never a time in the Old Testament where people were declared righteous by what they did rather than what they believed, King Saul’s final act was suicide and he still ended up with the prophet Samuel, who also specifically said that God looks at the inner man.
It's not a Tweet! It's a Truth! He is posting exclusively on Truth Social! So should you, if you love Trump!
Numbers 23:19 specifically says that God doesn't change his mind like a man and Chapter 30 in Deuteronomy asks why people think it is so hard to follow the rules he set forth.
There are many verses in the books of the prophets where they warn people that simply bringing an animal sacrifice doesn't fix their sin. From what I understand Jews would agree with the statement that belief precedes action which is why they follow the rules God put forth.
those digits
You can’t make this shit up
It's coming and so is He.
Just be ready.
follow the rules God put forth.
lol
Psalms 143:2
David blatantly condemns religion himself.
loves jews
loves niggers
part of a child rape circle
he would be the perfect pope
christcucks will seethe
christians will be mad
which Christians are you talking about? You're sort of revealing your hand here Moshe. You unironically drank your own kool-aid.
you have to go back
Catholicism is Satanic
David blatantly condemns religion himself.
The Jews I've met would agree with you that understanding comes first. I don't know what else you're getting at. You did skip over the counterpoint that God doesn't change his mind.
cross needs to be upset down but otherwise it fits
Official WH page just tweeted it wtf
the word repent is mentioned several times in genesis. Most of the time, It's God.
he wants me to believe that what God doesn't allow for man, he cannot do himself when he is not a man that he should lie, somehow means that Jesus isn't God, when his logic is heavily implying that there isn't a single righteous man that has ever existed, which is the basis for his interpretation based on his religion.
Anon, you simply do not believe, and this is what Isaiah meant by 29:12.
Matthew brings it up again in 13:14. Matthew and Luke are books devoted to Jesus dunking on religion and religious priests. Matthew 7:21 is literally aimed at people who think they're justified by what they do, clearly meaning that the God of the bible advocated for grace from the beginning, and that this in of itself contrasts itself against every religion that has ever existed. Which all seemingly hate this specific interpretation of the book, and validates what Jesus said, "My kingdom is not of this world."
Seriously, your talmudic jewery has no power here, synagogue of Satan.
I don't even know if we're discussing the same thing because Christians view righteousness through their lens of Original Sin, which isn't in Judaism. From what I understand, Jews consider fulfilling their mitzvot (commandments aka the rules put forth by God) that those are acts of righteousness.
Original Sin, which isn't in Judaism.
Dishonest. and this is why Christians will not engage with you.
Also, Judaism, (the word) is no where even in the Old Testament, and its existence and the fact that you acknowledge it is very telling.
Original sin, isn't biblical. Neither is judaism to the extent that it has anything to do with God in The Old Testament.
Paul is credited with the theory of Original Sin from Romans 5:12
what a sperg
votes are in
white smoke, there is new Pope
announced, it's not Trump
Trump urges millions of his followers to break into the Vatican and void the vote because it was fraudulent