Normally, giving civilians so many weapons would be enough to cause a riot. Civilians would be intent on overthrowing the government for a variety of reasons.
Mexico is an example of this, where the drug lords are basically similar to warlords. The Mexican government is powerless to stop them from dealing drugs, and ruling their cities.
And civilians in the US have so many guns and the only thing the civilians have in mind is to loot and create massacres of innocent civilians. No idea of overthrowing the government or revolution comes up.
How does the US government do that?
How does the U.S. government manage to have everyone with a gun and not have riots?
Do you think these guns can damage a fighter jet?
Can a fighter jet defend critical infrastructure from sabotage 24/7?
How does the U.S. government manage to have everyone with a gun and not have riots?
Because we are not an authoritarian Communist dictatorship. Its understandable your government wouldn't trust its subjects with guns, but we live in a free society unlike you.
A just government wouldn't have to worry about any of that.
Guns don't do crime, people do.
Do you think these guns can damage a fighter jet?
This anon never heard of asymetrical warfare. Guess what, those fighter pilots have families.
Cause guns aren't the problem.
Niggers are, spics are, jeets are, etc
YELLOW PERIL
chink spies are everywhere
Because americans are fucking worthless pussies who would never dream of using those guns to defend themselves against the government.
Niggers and communists have absolutely shit tier guns and virtually no idea how to use them properly. Actual whites very rarely riot. How ever the kikes and their zog state are absolutely terrified of an armed white uprising and will do literally anything to subvert and prevent it.
Unlike you cunts Americans have a democracy that sorta, almost works, they have some say in policy and are able to influence policy without violence, but it's always on the table.
Do you think these guns can damage a fighter jet?
Kek I grew up in one of the shittiest parts of africa, two blokes with .50 cals can cripple an entire airforce in 5 minutes, one bloke with a thermal lance can drop a bridge and halt an entire army.
The government knows this all too well which is why they go to great lengths to keep some semblance of democracy alive, especially in the US.
Stasi tactics prevent this. Surveillance, informant culture, censorship of scientific knowledge (it’s very hard to find old chemistry textbooks that sren’t censored to hell). and also making sure most people are too poor to afford building up any real threatening armaments or a financially viable company etc on their own.
The US and all western governments are very totalitarian and communist, but they spend lots of money annually on maintaining an propagandistic illusion of this mid-20th century potempkin “freedom”.
You wouldn’t need to. A competent guerilla strategist who is using the element of surprise would immediately say
destroy all enemy aircraft while they are on the ground.
And it’s just that simple. Fighting jets after takeoff is the same as blowing up your own spot. In vietnam during the Tet Offensive, this is precisely what they tried to do, albeit many AF bases were out of reach behind US lines. But domestically, this caveat clearly wouldn’t exist.
You need to study why revolutions happen.
two blokes with .50 cals
They can hold aircraft at bay by forcing them up to higher altitude, but I challenge you to show me a documented case of one or 2 50s bringing down a modern jet. Those hellfire missiles or whatever they call them can still hit their targets even if fired way up at the high altitudes. Might be less accurate
we were and still are to some extent a very civilized people. it's why it's so easy for team poooutsideofloo and la raza to take over. fuck dude, we literally let women be in charge because we felt bad about it.
Do you think these guns can damage a fighter jet?
There was some kid who shot an Apache to the point of severing a hydraulic line during training. They handed him live rounds instead of blanks. That pilot must've shit himself and the infantry grunt probably was called a legend for it.
Flouride
Geography.
Most gun owners do not live in cities, only in distant suburbs and small towns. They use them mostly to protect their property from drug addled hicks. No sane yank is going to drive a hundred miles at current gas prices just to shoot up the ghetto, and no gang banger has that much motive to drive into the sticks where there ain't no Popeyes or KFC. It's worse in Europe, where if the population did have guns, they'd be other throwing governments every other week, like in South America.
america is too fat to revolt
they would be gasping for breath before they finished running a single city block carrying any of those guns
Yes.
What was their KDR?
Yeah because armies are going across security risk bridges and not bringing their own.
the government knows this
you are retarded.
its as simple as defeating the tank division defending the air field
how simple
Not a jet.
Fighter jets can't go door to door looking for contraband (like guns and ammo for said guns).
the fighter jets have to land somewhere, and the pilots have to get out at some point, so no, it wouldn't be safe for anyone in this country, even jet pilots. especially pilots
What was their KDR?
Not as bad as you think, actually. In the case of the Taliban, they not only won the war but also had a better KDR, not because they were able to kill a lot of American soldiers, but because they killed a lot of soldiers of that ZOG puppet regime we tried to install over there. Factor in those deaths and the Taliban's KDR was actually positive.
I'm not sure of the Vietcong offhand, but it might be similar where they didn't kill all that many of our guys, but did manage to take out a lot of our South Vietnamese puppet's troops. That's my guess but you can easily look it up yourself if you care to.
Either way though, a win is a win regardless of what the KDR is.
how are small arms going to threaten aircraft carriers?
We're not talking conventional warfare mate. You don't shoot them in the air, you shoot them on the ground. Which is where jets spend 99.99999999% of their time, where pilots spend their time, where fuel tankers and mechanics spend their time.
Now guys plinking airfields is what they did when I was growing up, now you can do it with a $100 drone. Even jets on aircraft carriers and tanks are no longer safe. Just look at what's happening in ukraine and the middle east daily.
Yeah because armies are going across security risk bridges and not bringing their own.
Every bridge throughout history has been a point of contention or a high value target during a war, logistics are king. When militaries have to ford a river without a bridge they are extremely vulnerable, every river crossing in ukraine has been a total fucking disaster for both sides.
And then you've got vulnerabilities like rail. If the US has to move tanks across the nation, they're going by rail. Do you seriously think the US government can protect every inch of it's rail network against it's own people?
The US government has to play nice with it's people because the alternative is africa tier only the cunts are better armed, smarter and way better organised.
how are small arms going to threaten aircraft carriers?
Drones lad.
Their KDR was significantly worse against real soldiers, whom any American militia would be fighting.
a win is a win
America did not even try.
Do you even know what an army waging war on a people, not a national force but a people, looks like? it looks like Germany in Poland in 1944, it looks like a complete stomp.
A single tank division could annihilate every mutt militard in the country.
The US army in Asia had to go home.
In America they are home.
we can not fight an army.
Either we take the army on our side, or we might as well not fight at all.
Yes. Go shoot an AR at a parked jet. Watch holes appear. Do you think jets never land?
America did not even try.
It was a good way to kill off some of America's White males, at the same time when jews in Congress opened up immigration for non-Whites at the first time, and many non-Whites did immigrate her as a direct consequence of that war.
You say we didn't win that war and you're right. I don't think it was even the point of it. That way and all others we've fought since then have been about killing off American White males, while simultaneously kicking foreign hornet's nests to stir up migrants to invade White countries (not necessarily America).
Picrel.
Americans have a democracy that sorta, almost works, they have some say in policy and are able to influence policy without violence,
Oh sweet summers child
those fighter pilots have families.
So you're saying that, during a real shift scenario, we would have armed "patriotic" maniacs threatening the families of military and government officials with rape and murder?
It takes a real patriot to rape and murder the children of tyrants.
Ukraine
You mean where both sides have tanks, artillery, and heavy weapons?
The US will move tanks by rail
If you removed all the rail lines in the US they could still rapidly deploy IFVs, tanks arent even necessary and if they were they could actually drive them if absolutely needed.
No one in America has anything that can destroy a well armed SWAT dept.
let alone the actual military.
American people do not produce Drones with that kind of range.
Also that specific instance was from a missile.
No one in America has anything that can destroy a well armed SWAT dept.
let alone the actual military.
Nigger all you gotta do is melt down pre-1982 pennies and pour the copper into cones and make IEDs. Even a desert goatherder can do it.
Kek you are 100% a fed, so whatever mate, you keep pretending that cheap chink drones aren't taking out millions of dollars worth of military hardware.
Never in human history has the balance of violence been skewed so heavily in the favour of the average bloke which is why never in human history have cunts like you been so afraid of your populations.
Hey no one said it was perfect, but it's clearly good enough to stop full blown armed civil war.
Only 3,000 Americans died.
America has never been to war and so there are very silly ideas in America about what wars are like.
The deadliest War in US history thus far has been the civil war and there were singular battles that exceeded that war in both scope, scale, and casualties.
My prediction, Americans will go to war, a real war, with a peer and quickly realize we are unable to fight let alone win, we will become more desperate but to no avail.
Our opponent may exterminate us entirely or if they allow us to live we will have enough war-fighters to put together a serious break-away if ZOG is still in control.
Americans are a peace loving people and we do not have the fervor or pitilessness required for revolutionary wars or serious wars.
The entire American independence war saw only 12,000 combat casualties and this wasnt a revolution per se, it was lead by landed elites who didnt want a king ruling them, not by commoners who didnt like their landed elites; which is what we are today, we are powerless commoners who do not like our own elite.
We do not have a George Washington who is already an Elite who wants to be THE Elite rather than AN Elite.
We arent a revolutionary people or a martial people.
Afghanistan was nation-building, any counter-insurgency in America will be punitive nation destroying.
It wont look like Afghans who arent allowed to be shot unless shooting.
It will look like Poland 1944 or Palestine 1930 where death squads go around liquidating entire towns if one (1) IED goes off within a 10 mile radius.
The USA does not have a race problem.
It has a problem race. The USA does not have a gun problem. It has a NIGGER problem.
Because our quality of life is high.
We have food, shelter, security, entertainment.
You have to not have your basic needs met to cause an armed revolution or conflict.
all just rifles, shotguns, pistols
no rocket launchers, no flame throwers (not even Boring), no grenade launchers, no Gatling gun
Meh. Disappointing.
Sounds like a good way to radicalize the general population against the government. Good luck with that.
Yeah because Feds want actual winning strategies for overthrowing ZOG.
da average bloke
all the righteous bluster of the Brigante's who thought if they just hated the Romans enough they were sure to win.
We saw how that worked out for them.
This is why people from the British isles are perpetually being defeated by anyone who manages to land on them.
You people dont actually have what it takes to fight, you have never won through martial prowess.
The curse of the Angolem is their inability to correctly understand themselves and their enemies.
They are the opposite of Sun Tzu's ideal General.
why no riots
look at their skin color.
Based grey beard with his hippy chick baby factory.
So you're saying that, during a real shift scenario, we would have armed "patriotic" maniacs threatening the families of military and government officials with rape and murder?
If you're having fighter pilots bombing their own people, you can't expect there to not be some sort of retaliation. Maybe that doesn't make it "right", but the one who is most wrong is definitely the one who started it in the first place.
And what happens when they are radicalized?
The Government strategically bombs all US industry, food production, and logistical networks before systematically clearing states out.
Its this easy.
The US government holds onto 2/3 its nuclear arsenal (the ones deployed by sea and air), when facing an existential threat they demand, with the threat of nuclear force, someone like say Germany, Mexico, and Canada, act as a base of operations and resupply point for the US forces.
They wield the navy and airforce to limit outside contact with the rebellion.
They deploy amphibiously with swift armored spearheads (maybes its tanks, maybe its IFVs) quickly establishing beachheads and establishing networks of collaborators.
They go state by state with a 10 million man army sweeping away any resistance.
How do you fight that with small arms?
Muh nukes
Fake and gay.
Good luck man. I'll be getting into the undertaker business.
Jews have cooked the Americans' brain to the point where they won't do shit EVER
It's the great victory of Jewish subversion and they are proud of it and think it's funny
Because guns don't cause riots.