Were the monarchs right about socialism?
The expansion of the state hasn't been good for the individual, art, tradition, morale, etc.
Monarchy vs socialism
Sima Qian once commented that the recollections only get longer.. and he's right
If monarchism worked the UK wouldn't be a browning judeo-tyrannical shithole
So I guess western Europe doesn't exist? Miga amerimutt
Define "Worked"
Monarchies mostly keep people weak and ignorant to gratify the owners of the system.
Is it a real monarchy? It's shit because of socialism. Taxing the working class to pay the nigs.
when monarchy doesn't work, it's actually socialism
hello rabbi
English monarchs have been funny tourist attractions for centuries. Queen Anne in 1710 was the last to truly govern and even that was an anomaly not tolerated by the likes. The English monarchy never recovered from the (((glorious))) revolution. James 2 did nothing wrong.
No, that's only high expectations. People had more personal freedom under monarchy and had more of an ethnic identity.
If you want to find weak people, just look at the modern man. They own even less than medieval peasants. Small family, no social life, no purpose, no belonging, etc. The modern man owns less in every way.
The King has had all his power usurped, again only proving an absolute monarchy is the only way.
If the king can have his power usurped then that is by definition a failure of monarchy
If monarchy works so well, how come it doesn't exist anymore?
Rabbi? A lot of the democratic socialists in Britain were jewish. You're claiming that the governance of Britain is monarchy, yet they've a democratic parliament that literally runs the country. Your claim is not a serious argument.
In what way is monarchy governing the average Brit?
Every monarchy that has ever existed has failed
Based Stuart appreciator.
Well, yes, the monarchy failed many years ago all throughout Europe. Any that exists is just an aesthetic for the country and not an actual form of governance.
You're claiming that the governance of Britain is monarchy, yet they've a democratic parliament that literally runs the country. Your claim is not a serious argument.
It's called a constitutional monarchy you delirious potato worm. And considering the negative effect the British monarchy has had on your country you should be ashamed for posting this opinion
French revolution and its consequences.
Might over right. The bolshevisks won in Russia, but it doesn't mean the people were under a better system.
Monarchy can't be that good then if something as shitty as liberal democracy replaced it
What negative effect? They haven't personally taken a significant administrative decidion in centuries, and they bring in five times what they spend in tourism and people press bongbucks.
i want a small state
i want an unaccountable leader with absolute power
Genius.
It's called a constitutional monarchy
Ok? What's your point?
And considering the negative effect the British monarchy has had on your country you should be ashamed for posting this opinion
The Irish survived centuries of British monarchy but collapsed under two decades of state socialism.
Is that an argument for communism?
The Irish survived centuries of British monarchy but collapsed under two decades of state socialism.
Ireland is now one of the richest states in the EU with a higher average wage than Germany, while they were literally starved to death under monarchy for decades, leading to one of the largest diasporas in history
You are a schizophrenic jew
Remember what they stole from you.
This logic is wrong. Might can always win over right. It doesn't automatically mean it's a better system. Are you implying that modern globo homo is a better system?
The French Monarchy made the doubke mistakes of losing a pissing match against England then blowing their bank account helping the Americans.
Bad governance, but hindsight is 20/20.
Wow I've always wanted some random inbred pedophiles to spend my tax money on fancy cloths for themselves.
i dunno, the dudes in those photos don't look like jews to me...
nhh
picture of cryptojews who oppress the populus
nhh
youngest generations are majority african
"Ireland survived!"
The decline in British society correlates 1:1 with the decline in the power of the crown, only proving Monarchy works.
how come it doesn't exist anymore?
yeah sure, you don't call them king or emperor or your highness anymore but if you think we're not in some dystopian neofeudalism, you should stop taking your happy pills for a week
um ackshually correlation is really causation
You seem to be conveniently forgetting the crown sending millions of young british men to die in WWI when their power was unchallenged
Which was also coincidentally when they started reeling back on the crown's power because they had showed they were willing to execute every last one of their subjects in order to avoid threats to their power
Ireland is now one of the richest states in the EU with a higher average wage than Germany, while they were literally starved to death under monarchy for decades, leading to one of the largest diasporas in history
You are a schizophrenic jew
This is so much bullshit that even economists themselves have agreed that GDP per capita needs to be revised as a measure of economic success.
You can't tell me how my own country is. People may not be starving to death, but they're a broken people in every other way.
The Irish are now second class citizens in their own country. At least in the past, they had each other. Now they've got nothing. No hope, declined culture, demoralising agendas, and state socialism.
You can't tell me how my own country is. People may not be starving to death, but they're a broken people in every other way.
The Irish are now second class citizens in their own country. At least in the past, they had each other. Now they've got nothing. No hope, declined culture, demoralising agendas, and state socialism.
This is the result of women voting, not a lack of monarchic power.
See how easy it is to reduce complex issues to a correlative value?
The French revolution was caused by Jews because democracy is easier to subvert. The democracy experiment has failed.
Ok, what's your alternative?
Wow I've always wanted some random inbred pedophiles to spend my tax money on fancy cloths for themselves.
Instead of 1 of them now you have 100,000 bureaucrats who act like royal Kings, you still don't get it faggot
Monarchy had preserved traditions. Voting was always a slippery slope, so you can't blame women.
Monarchy is a system of government, socialism is a mode of production
Voting was always a slippery slope, so you can't blame women.
I can, and I will
Voting with only white male landowners allowed to vote is the highest, best form of governance. Which is why the jews have completely eliminated it's existence throughout the world
What if people got to collective decide how the country is governed, instead of it just being a random guy?
Except you don't and they don't.
I am a monarch. I and destined to d the king of the world. I am the most just incorruptible person on earth.
AMA
You will be getting to know me very well soon :)
only white male landowners
What would they need a vote for? Can't they run things themselves?
no purpose, no belonging, etc.
So much this my life is truly without purpose not dying in a pointless war for some inbred Habsburg
What would they need a vote for? Can't they run things themselves?
Even boards of directors have to have frequent votes on things. You either vote or roll dice, it ends up with less conflicts to just vote
What if people got to collective decide how the country is governed
You have to be over eighteen to post here.
dying in a pointless war for some inbred Habsburg
What about dying in a pointless war for some inbred zionist instead?
With monarchy, it was a privilege to serve your empire.
The state is the most evil institution ever devised by man or Satan. Statists, who are often violent and irrational, are suffering from a mass delusion because statism is the most dangerous religion.
Agreed.
Worked for whom? The managers sitting at the top of extractive institutions? Why the fuck do you think the system went up in smoke the moment the farmers realized they can just get better wages by moving around.
Monarchy will make a come back in your life!
A bad king doesn't disqualify monarchy dumb mutt subhuman.
Did someone say King?
Is it a real monarchy if the monarch has no power and can't be deposed by other royalty?
No ugly kings. Only handsome kings! Ugly kings are an offense! No mamzer kings! Mamzes are a shame!
nigga you've been ruled alternatively by the House of Lords and Parliament for over three centuries now, you are either an oligarchy or a Res Publica in a skinsuit
Monarchy works very well for the people at the top. It's terrible for everyone else however. All monarchs were originally revolutionaries and this goes back to a time where a caveman bashed in another caveman's head with a rock and claimed their resources. Monarchy is completely arbitrary and people who support it who aren't the monarch themselves are natural born slaves.
Monarchism inevitably degrades into inbred retards wasting all of their time on vanity and luxury while the court jews loot the kingdom's treasury and sell the populace into slavery
Not saying democracy is a solution to this, just pointing out the obvious to the retards who think monarchism will fix all of democracy's problems
Monarchist are subhuman edgy retards. No one actually belives it. And once you show them how the most monarhical nation where king and nobility controll most of the country is absolute hell for average citizen. They cope and seethe and invent bulshit.
UK has treated its citizens like shit for hundreds of years. Its not one bad king its a continuous policy. And the king has a lot of power to opose globohomo. King could kick foreigners out immediately king could end loicence shit and make housing cheap in UK . No one would opose it. They have legal authority and support from the poeple.
They have 1000 times more power than average poeple that opose globohomo every day yet they did absolutely nothing. If anything they aided it.
Direct democracy would never vote for mass migration and all the wef own nothing policies .
Unless you have legaly binding referendums you are not a democracy.
democracy's problems
All centralized power structures are just monarchy wearing a facade. And monarchy is really just a bunch of gangsters. Democracy just creates a diversion and a spectacle for bread and circuses morons. Centralization of power as an inevitability, but I propose that the individual do everything in his power to break the chains that bind him and become his own "monarch". Become the person that everyone sends money to just for existing by any means necessary. Or get stomped by a bunch of gangsters.
What if people got to collective decide how the country is governed
all collectives are fucking retarded, its just math
that could only even theoretically work if there was some qualifier, like >120 IQ
literally no collective has ever done anything meaningful of their own will. everything starts with the vision of one leader, whom then needs followers to carry it out
Direct democracy would never vote for mass migration and all the wef own nothing policies .
Only if you exclude women from voting. Women would vote themselves into the mouth of an open volcano if they thought it was the popular thing to do