How is he wrong? Google is a private business not government suppression on free speech
NHH
Alphabet (Google) is notoriously intertwined with U.S. government intelligence
businesses have moral obligations but governments don't
they tried to ban
Lady Chatterley's Lover
the mere fact that you know the name of that book is a testament to how effective this particular strategy is.
Only lolberts believe in this, guess what, they’re a (extreme) minority.
If you have your service open to the US, you gotta respect their amendments, which include free speech, otherwise, nationalize your ass.
I don't remember exactly but haven't we already had this argument with section 230 that if large platforms remove political speech they don't like that isn't illegal then they become liable for all of the content on the website?
Funny part is that you can still find actual nazi german songs and even hitler speeches from youtube.
So it is not the hitler part they are afraid
Then remove section 230 protections.
Too bad Google takes government subsidies and tax breaks, ergo they are not strictly a private company.
platform
vs
publisher
Anyway, you're only proving him right, trust me, nogs are still getting his song and bumping it. Youtube can take it down everytime it shows up, Ye has millions of people listening anyway.
Go ahead, prove his point.
But Get Trained To Make Arrests, these faggots are getting shifty.
That song would have gotten 200 million views on youtube.
That's why ending online censorship should be the next cause celebre
nooo not like this!
Judaism is a hate group, their books are full of hate speech. With the same justfication you could ban all jewish content but I bet that twitter retard would sound completely different
All made up jewish legalize that I won't stand for.
Can't believe these fucking racist media outlets trying to push the black man to the back of the bus trying to silence him once again.
How can he be a nazi? he's black. Someone please explain how that's wrong in the current meta?
he's right when it comes to legal precedents
prager university v. google affirmed youtube is a private entity and not a public forum.
the first amendment is an inalienable right granted to us by our Creator though, so any restriction on expression, even by private companies, violates the fundamental principle of unrestricted discourse.
this is why atheists can't be americans.
I never thought about it until my favorite actor from Better Call Saul! put it this way. Dang that Hitler guy was pretty bad huh. I'm gonna reverse mortgage my home to donate to Israel. Did you know the Jewish people were nearly holocausted? They need a place to call their own.
dont listen to that sir! No no, stop chuckling sir! Im defending democracy sir!
Literally like the meme lmfao, the real question is why are they so afraid of someone hearing 2 words? Why is it SO dangerous for people to hear heil hitler but its not dangerous for people to watch murder, rape and beheadings on state sponsored tv?
company censors something
private company can do what they want
company uncensors something
NOOOO PRIVATE COMPANY CANT DO WHAT THEY WANT, GOV NEEDS TO BAN THEM!!!!
these people are retarded because they support censorship for the wrong reasons.
NHH and the alt right fascists should be hunted down and executed because they are a threat to the rule of law and the democratic process. they want to destroy the democratic state. they consider themselves to be enemy combatants and they should be treated as such - not criminals, not citizens, but hostile soldiers. kill them.
this retard just wants to censor them because he personally doesn't like what they're saying. he doesn't like racism, but he doesn't care about the lawlessness. so long as you're lawless but doing things he likes he's perfectly fine with it, in fact. he is, in essence, just a fascist of a different kind.
if someone has views that need to be censored you should just kill them, because the only views that should be censored are the ones that are actively hostile to the eternal state. racism is not anti-state, but wanting to bring about a racist order through anti-state activities is. lawful racism > lawless egalitarianism.
It's suppression of free speech. People who care about free speech will not cheer on tyranny from capitalist overlords, idiot.
Why is he roleplaying as a television character? Is he autistic?
Anyway, it doesn't matter what platforms ban it. It's out. The Internet is forever. The data has spread.
Violations of civil and human rights don't become A-OK because the government has outsourced them to the Corporate Persons the government creates.
The internet is the modern public square. Anyone that has censored anyone online is guilty of treason. Our tax dollars funded DARPA creating the World Wide Web and our rights extend there as a result of that. The internet is American. Censorship is treason.
Being a private business does not allow you to break the law or the constitution.
This is true. They preach slavery and have a history of slavery. Jewish groups have been advisors to the fbi and naturally they sent them to persecute whites during this. This needs to be looked into. It is quite clear that Jews are using the American state power to act in the interests of Israel. This is treason that our own state has betrayed the people like this. Zogbots defend Jewish nationalists but hate the idea of their own people having a home.
No actually we consider you traitors.
America was founded by white nationalists explicitly as a white ethnostate. It is you who has a problem with the founding fathers. You are a traitor and an enemy to America.
What's hate speech about it? It's Heil Hitler.
Doesn't say much about jews. Doesn't really have any hate in it.
It's really been censored because Google kikes hate Hitler. So they censored a black man.
Liking Hitler is not hate speech you're not hating on anyone.
Saul Goodman is a grifter and a Jew larper. Look into his past. His real name is Jimmy McGill, better known as Slippin Jimmy.
i am not american.
And yet you faggots cry cry for government censorship on our fed traps... I mean "Free Speech" supporting businesses for saying shit you don't like and do illegal shit to them all the time.
Why don't you fuck off you faggots?
hate speech is not a real thing and even if it were it's protected. companies have gotten away with illegally censoring speech but the only things they are legally allowed to censor are direct threats, CP, and other actually illegal things.
We can tell you are china's punk bitch
Even w out the flag
Google is far more powerful than any government was when that law was written.
(((the democratic process)))
remove 230 protections for google, then. go on and do it then, pussy.
Fuck you, Saul. I'ma listen to whatever the fuck I want and there ain't shit you can do about it. I don't give a fuck if it glorifies genocide.
Right when's the last time Google invaded somewhere or imprisoned someone?
You are a Jewish cia agent sitting at Langley falls that seethes about whites having a right to exist while also supporting your own peoples right to exist.
youtube is a business, not a government branch
okay, but can you show me every contract youtube, google, and alphabet has with the government?
because for a business that "isn't the government" i'm like 99% sure they actually get money from the government every single day, and literally converse and think tank with revolving door government cronies to regulate internet content, right?
and if so, isn't that like....the ACTUAL definition of facism? the merging of state and corporate power, so much that you can't even tell which is which anymore?
like isn't that ACTUAL fascism; when you can't tell if the government or google is restricting your speech, because let's be real they are the same thing?
yes, it's a gate that swings both ways.
if you legally claim you have the right to curate all content on your platform, you have also admitted you have curated all content on your platform, and are thus legally liable for whatever that content contains.
of course, they skirt this shit and just do what they want. because they are the government pretending to be a "private" corporation. ie the actual definition of fascism.
i DONT THINK THIS IS THE REAL sAUL gOODMAN
this is what i checked.
if it was merely okay to censor all this shit based literally only the phrase "heil hitler" then why when i search "heil hitler" it's nothing but MSM articles trying to get clickbait money from ye's song?
but they won't just host ye's song? but yeah they can put "heil hitler" in their headline?
i don't fucking get it. they took down my guitar tutorial video. all i did was play a song. it's gone now.
NHH and the alt right fascists should be hunted down and executed because they are a threat to the rule of law and the democratic process. they want to destroy the democratic state. they consider themselves to be enemy combatants and they should be treated as such - not criminals, not citizens, but hostile soldiers. kill them.
How is he wrong? Google/Alphabet is a private business not government suppression on free speech
He's not wrong, private platforms are allowed to ban hate speech and objectionable content, actually it might be their duty to shareholders of Alphabet to ban fascists since advertisers don't want to fund a hate speech platform. The first amendment is about government censoring speech, not corporations.
You are 100% correct. Their hubris will be punished eventually.
Nigga heil hitler
god the "woke right" and elon fanboys needs to fucking die already
this is the exact same rhetoric the left have been leveling against us for a decade
if you legally claim you have the right to curate all content on your platform, you have also admitted you have curated all content on your platform, and are thus legally liable for whatever that content contains.
Not true, curated content like a news story is different than banning objectionable content from an open platform. If you ran a Childrens Christian Basket Weaving Forum and someone came on posting about satanic rituals, it would be within the websites right to remove that person's content based on their ToS. For example in YouTube, if someone was posting hardcore porn or someone was talking in the comments in detail about how they enjoyed taping children, it would be their duty to Shareholders to take it down to protect advertisers from bad publicity so they keep funding the platform and it can continue to return profits to shareholders.
isn't ABC funded by taxpayer money THO?
So why can't private companies own slaves and discriminate against people?
I thought companies were free to violate rights.
Oh wait. They're not.
Historical decency
Verbal IQ showing. This has legs. Expect to see more complaints of chuds violating basic standards of historical decency.
It's going to be fun watching socialist boot licking censorship lovers die by the millions in ww3
Muslims are child fucking niggers
Google takes orders from the government and is in my opinion a kin to a public square in the modern age
its a berg word.
constitutional crisis
a threat to democracy
Yeah, we will be hearing more about how censorship is ok in this case from the kikes.
Allows rap that advocates murder
Censors a song that talks about Jews keeping Ye from seeing his children.
The noticing continues
America was founded by white nationalists explicitly as a white ethnostate
Read a history book.
Is google a publisher or platform?
Tell it to make up it's mind and suffer the consequences of its actions!
This.
Government paying and threatening a private company to censor free speech for them is a violation of the 1st amendment.
Sorry moshe kike berg but you can't both be protected from content on your platform and also decide what speech you want to allow. Also you shouldn't have bought up the public square if you didn't want to be the public square you jew.
Truly we need the White House to slap these people into the reality that is the first amendment
(((Goodman)))
google only functions because of government contracts
ask yourself the nature of money
they need twitter and google for normies to function
YouTube loses money every year. They don't operate like a business. They are just a propaganda arm of Google.
Google should NOT have the Fair Harbor exemption, because they are a PUBLISHER, and one that has worked illegally with the feds many, many, many, many, many, many times.
advertisers don't want to fund a hate speech platform
he doesn't know lol
November 2023
Sorry moshe kike berg but you can't both be protected from content on your platform and also decide what speech you want to allow.
The investors are basically the decision point and sorry but most people and companies are not interested in their ad for their small store in Germantown, WI to be aired next to a Heil Hitler video or some other neo-nazi slop video.
Also you shouldn't have bought up the public square if you didn't want to be the public square you jew.
Dim Tool, that you?
Written by chatgpt
Anyone who uses the term fascist like that is a moron. Don't need to read beyond that.
fascism is when the government pretends to be private corporations
You need to fuck off and read a book, nigger.
Nigga heil hitler
NOT MUH HECKIN FEDERINOS
It's not fair that this platform contacted the feds about muh heckin favorite Nazis to NARC on them for posting their crimes to social media
Are you going to cry faggot?
1pbtid
Is this the new line for unthinking drones on the right?
You think I cant spot the random - every sentence kek
First Ammendment = Protection From Govt. Censorship
Ok. That's true.
No a blanket blah blah blah hate speech blah blah blah.
This is where he's wrong. Censorship of anything is literally govt. enforced. That makes his statements contradictory.
So boycotting pissrael and hating Jews is just fine? Got it, thanks kike xD