Why do chuds defend capitalism when it's literally the system under which everything has went to shit in Western...

Why do chuds defend capitalism when it's literally the system under which everything has went to shit in Western countries?

Yes I agree. Lets have communism so everyone can die of starvation instead

communism is when there's no le food!

Daring today, aren't we?

A market economy works just fine after you get rid of jews.

All Americans are the bottom picture

Not daring. Just not downs syndrome level brain damaged

For people above the age of 40 it's likely genuine brainwashing because of the Cold War. For people below the age of 40 it's more likely resentment at their own inadequacies projected outwards as taking a harsh view of others' perceived weakness

Note that the latter is particularly pronounced amongst Asians, because they tend to be raised by parents who drill into them that their worth is determined by their material success

If you put so much as a 10% tax on slave picked cocoa or lithium batteries with slave-mined rare earth minerals from the congo, the left acts like it's the apocalypse

Just be white men and write white men laws. they've done this with food labels. You just need to ban a lot of monopoly shit.

ban food stamps for candy/soda

great
now ban loss leaders.
I know why corn is subsidized for national security reasons (insulation against famine as a pressure point of the USA) but holy shit was corn syrup just the shittiest food for people.

HOW COULD ANYONE LIVE WITHOUT PISS LEMONADE?!

The market.

No, the market isn't forcing you to buy anything.

But, you have to pay a little more for any of the good ones.

But a real good one you'd have to look a little harder for and pay bit more.

So you acknowledge there are better options but you are choosing not to buy them.

You are the problem with capitalism, not the other way around.

Dummy, who has that kind of money. It makes lemonade more of a luxury and less of anything that's actually refreshing.
Capitalism presents its own problems and Jews don't need to do shit for it ti have those problems.

Dummy, who has that kind of money.

So, who is forcing you to buy lemonde, again?

memeflag

Oh looks like I've made more than enough money for a life time I guess it's time to start selling my cars cheaper and paying my workers more

Based white capitalists.

NOT SO FAST GOY!!!
I need you to make maximum profits for my shareholder dividends.

The diluted lemonade and piss manufacturers lobbied the government for special status/"regulations" that make it impossible to complete with them. Whenever you try to get the government to strip those special statuses/"regulations" so actual lemonade manufacturers can compete with the piss guys leftists throw screaming sharting meltdowns over it.

The diluted lemonade and piss manufacturers lobbied the government for special status/"regulations" that make it impossible to complete with them

WHO IS FORCING YOU TO BUY LEMONADE?

YouTubers

name a communist country that has not had a famine other than cuba

hurr durr you don't like capitalism so you must want communism

How about a more-fair capitalism / market, you retard?

There's a million steps between where we're at now, and the Communism strawman you build on Anon Babble daily.

A product existing is not forcing you to buy it.
Who is forcing you to buy lemonade?

niggers tongue my anus and I went to shit in their mouths

Logan Paul and Olajide Olatunji said if I don't drink prime then I'll burn in hell for all eternity

Unregulated capitalism leads to monopolies. The bigger company buys out the smaller ones or drives them out of business by temporarily undercutting the price. Corporations don't want competition, they want market dominance.

So they didn't force you to buy lemonade.
Who is forcing you to buy lemonade then?

No one.
But, capitalism would prevent one from having lemonade.
Under certain circumstances (inflation, recession, etc) would the lemonade be virtually inaccessible to the general public.

Government regulation causes the bottom part.

top right frame doesn't make any sense as communism never promised that
it should be like everyone holding hands under a rainbow or some gaynigger crap like that

Government regulation prevents piss being in your lemonade.
It's called the FDA.
Well, at least they used to be about that.

I hate communism, also it took like 30 seconds

naturally flavored with other natural flavors

What did they mean by this? Why isn't it just lemon and aids?

No one.

There you go. Problem solved.
Now the faggots making dogshit lemonade either choose to make good lemonade, go bankrupt because no one is drinking their dogshit lemonade or they dismantle their dogshit lemonade department allowing competition in the market to thrive.

I'll say it again: You (as in, the individuals) are the the problem with capitalism, not the other way around.

fixed it boy marx sure was jewish, never knew, not really into Anon Babble's obsession with jews, but damn though

Lynchian-Buffettian capitalism of moats and “Competition may prove hazardous to human wealth.”

It doesn't help that secret services, military, and other establishment spearheads pick & choose champions, control them via some back-channeled specially placed consultant or VP or advisor or...
The jig is up, jackarses.

In-Q-Tel?
Allen & Company Sun Valley Conference?
Daughter of Huawei as vice-president, which also coincidentally is an officer of the Chinese secret services, nevermind other Chinese companies?
Russian oligarchs backed by KGB-GRU officers?

The jig is up: securocracy propping up “capitalism” is not capitalism.

yes
good show

they play both ends
answer's in the middle

Or it stays because it's the only affordable lemonade.

it's the only affordable lemonade

Once again, who is forcing you to buy it?

I want lemonade without piss, without quality dilution, and without any other compromises for seen or unforseen.

Is that a problem, because...?

There ya go!

That's the & our problem with Lynchian-Buffettian/Chinese/oligarchic-backed securocratcy “capitalism”...

Life is.
Sometimes it's nice to have a little something refreshing that isn't just water.
Sometimes something is better than nothing.
I don't expect a Nazi to understand.
Just a thougt.

has went

Once again, who is forcing you to buy it?

Why isn't it fraudulent if it's not what it is?

Fraud apologia, literally.

KILL ALL LEFTOIDS

Stalin abolished famines.

I want

Great. So now that you finally acknowledge it's entirely a you being a consoomer issue, we can move on to the next point.

So you want some good lemonade.

Why don't you make some yourself?

Why don't you go to the small scale local brand that is far more expensive?

Even Cuba's had food shortages in the 90's.

Im going to enjoy stacking socialist corpses like sand bags in civil war 2.0

This is literally a National Socialist board what the fuck are you talking about?
If you're talking about the kikes and jeets and all types of other shitskins parasites that have flooded this board, they are not Anon Babble

How capitalism actually works

I pay the [foreign country] to make mine and sell it at a 4,000% mark up

Then I complain that they are ripping me off when they double their manufacturing costs because my investment in their labour potential formed a middle class in their country so I increase my prices to compensate.

The country that makes my lemonade has organised itself to the extent that I now need to invent a premise to completely destroy it.

Everything falls on deaf ears because their complaints are from the 19th century. Arizona Ice Tea is a business owned by one guy that never sold to some firm or went public and they can still sell them for $0.99 while the entire economy is getting raped by inflation . Once you turn it into some collective responsibility, suddenly nobody's responsible, and negligence leads to the fat cat monster they portray as Capitalism, which as demonstrated is only more present in collectivized command economies.

i diluted mine to profit more

Then consumers wouldn't buy his watery product and he would lose tons of money and go out of business.

Chile under Pinochet. Yugoslavia under Tito. Iran under Mossadeq. Now, look these up ask yourself why you were never told of them.

If this were the case then why wouldn't a businessman make more profit by making a higher quality product that people want to buy instead of piss?

How capitalism actually works:

My lemonade uses cheaper ingredients so we can sell it to the customers for incredibly cheap

My lemonade uses the best ingredients around. Grade A primo stuff, but it'll cost you.

My lemonade has added flavors like strawberry, blueberry, or etc to differentiate from the standard lemonade

My lemonade is carbonated with caffeine to function as an energy drink

All 4 exist on the market simultaneously while the first company makes 80% of lemonade sales.

it's literally the system under which everything has went to shit in Western countries?

Nah, it's actually usury and central banking that has lead to this shit.

Pinochet

lol @ me
I meant Allende. The peasants starved under Pinochet.

The west has never tried real capitalism

Chile under Pinochet

Communist

Uhhh...?

Yugoslavia under Tito

Yugoslavia had a famine in the late 1940s. Yes, under Tito. It wasn't as devastating as the famines in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia, or etc, but they did have a famine.

Iran under Mossadegh

He was in power for 2 years. If you manage to engineer a famine in 2 years that's rather impressive.

Why don't you make some yothought.

Okay, but now I'm kind of operating outside of capitalism.
The argument is why is capitalism good.

why don't I get the more expensive stuff

You more or less just answered that.

Why are the goym buying diluted and piss lemonade? The system works

If it did, it'd collapse rather quickly.

Yugoslavia had a famine in the late 1940

All of Europe had a famine of varying intensity in the late 40's. We just had a world war.

He [Mossadeq] was in power for 2 years

And then he nationalized the oil. And then MI6 and CIA, and the rest is history that's never told.

Pinnochet

Yes, a brain fart, I meant Allende.

yep. Capitalism while faster than other systems, destroys any soul behind a thing. First it corrupts everything to make money out of it and then while innovating it also does the most cost cutting possible. In the end it's beyond horrible but when it starts you don't see the end.

now I'm kind of operating outside of capitalism

You aren't, you are still engaging with it. It's a question to make a point further down the line.
So, why don't you? If all you care about is having some good lemonade, there's no reason why you wouldn't make it yourself, right?

You more or less just answered that.

No, I'm looking for your specific answer. No wiggle room for you to say "b-but I didn't say that".

Pinochet turned Chile into the richest country in Latin America (per capita). He did the hard and unpopular work because he didn't bother with elections until all the hard work was done.

He invited a bunch of hyper capitalists (including Milton Friedman) to advise him on how to fix the ruined economy and it worked miracles. To the point where even Thatcher and Reagan were taking notes. The Chicago Boys were ignored in the West until Chile was proof positive of their work.

True, but Somalia has.

They weren't fucking communist you retard

We did have food shortages and mass inflation you absolute niggerlover
We had large black markets due to the economy falling apart, as well as brownoid communist militias being used as attack dogs by allende, killing and occupying land from white farmers (descendants of german immigrants in the south), all of which eventually led to pinochet the CIA asset taking over and jewing up the country
The retard couldve just made some social reforms like other NATO countries if he wanted to help le poor so badly, instead he decided to become castro's best friend and constantly trigger the US into helping coup us
Go kys now

Why do it have to make it?
Why isn't it produced through capitalism?
Also to the latter, it's expensive.

Don't know about that, but I'm meming on the "never tried real communism". But I'm critizing capitalism with that.

Because all competitors not only went to shit but died too, making capitalism still remain the winner if a pitiful one.

This is beautiful

All of Europe had a famine of varying intensity in the late 40's. We just had a world war.

That's not true. You had famines during WW2, but after things stabilized as people were able to get back to farming. The Netherlands had its worst famine in its entire history in the Winter of 44/45 because the Nazis stole all their food. They even resorted to eating tulip bulbs because they didn't have potatoes or carrots.

And then he nationalized the oil. And then MI6 and CIA, and the rest is history that's never told.

Oh no, you can't just steal someone else's property without just compensation? Damn, who would've thought?

Iran wouldn't seen a cent from their oil reserves if not for the Brits and Americans setting up the industry for them. They didn't have the wherewithal or intelligence to drill for oil. Persians and Arabs were incredibly backwards because of their strict adherence to Islam.

Iran was better under the Shah. It was on its way to being a world power before Jimmy Carter fucked it all up by unleashing the Ayatollah.

So, which on is it?

What if we just forced all the shitskins to work as slaves to feed us in a Spartan style system? We imported enough of them might as well put em to good use.

The Jews aren't why Chile is fucked up now. It's the Communists you let creep back in with Pinochet's fall from power. Same with Peru being fucked up because the Fujimoris were couped from power. Or how Argentina went from being the 3rd richest country in the New World to backwater shithole because of a century of Peronism.

Command economies don't work. You can meddle in the market and make things better if you know what you're doing, but Marxists understand economics about as well as those who believe in the Four Humors understand medicine.

I love democracy

You forgot one!
Interestingly jews always forget that there is a third option

Why do it have to make it?

Why not? You said you wanted some lemonade. Why shouldn't making it yourself not be an option?
You engage in the capitalist system while not engaging with the bad actor/corposs making shit lemonade. It *should* be a good thing if you have a problem with corporations, shouldn't it?

Why isn't it produced through capitalism?

It already is. You have low quality dogwater, and good quality one. But you apparently don't want to buy one (for being shit) nor the other (for being expensive).

it's expensive

Why shouldn't it be? It's a good product, made from good ingredients, not diluted or cut corners.

Absolutely fucking retarded

Eurocunts can't comprehend a system where daddy govt DOESNT hold your hand and wipe your ass from cradlevto grave

Shut up you racing lunatic.

That is kinda true but jews are the ones who aid communists as well, they play both sides of the coin
Without pinochet, an inevitable right wing victory in the 1976 elections would have led to chile still becoming a relatively wealthy country without jewish aspects like the rise of lgbt, feminism and nigger worship, sort of like japanese capitalism
Not to mention leftoids would not have their favorite boogeyman and the 6 gorillion dead communists

Better version

Your jewish family will be put to hard labor until you die, ARBEIT MACHT FREI

Because we are invested in the capital markets.

Why not? You said you wanted some lemonade. Why shouldn't making it yourself not be an option?

You engage in the capitalist system while not engaging with the bad actor/corposs making shit lemonade. It *should* be a good thing if you have a problem with corporations, shouldn't it?
No. It's either I make it or nothing.
Which is a failure of capitalism.

Why shouldn't it be? It's a good product, made from good ingredients, not diluted or cut corners.

But, then it becomes a matter of who can afford it.

I think any market that has sold humans can adequately say it's tried "Real capitalism", retard.

No. It's either I make it or nothing.

Wrong. You still have the option of buying cheap and bad or buying expensive and good on top of it.
You are choosing neither of those. Do you even ACTUALLY want lemonade?

then it becomes a matter of who can afford it

But this is not a problem exclusive to capitalism.

Fruit juices like lemonade are retardedly concentrated out of America and don't have piss in them.

Fuck all socialist euronigs

I'm going to enjoy watching millions of you retards die in ww3

Chile under Pinochet

The fuck I just read?

Notice the fraud apologia, yet again.

But this is not a problem exclusive to capitalism.

If the poorest of the poor can't afford, the rich mustn't have access to it either – foreign or domestic.

There, I just fixed the social contract vis-a-vis economics & affordability between all social classes.

If the poorest of the poor can't afford, the rich mustn't have access to it either

Explain why.

It doesn't even apply to food, you have good quality food at decent prices across the glkbe due to free markets. Outside of people actually living beneath the poverty line everyone can afford good healthy food.

They just also tend to choose not to.

Fuck you jew and your whole rat family of parasites

No

I will piss on the mountain of retarded leftist corpses from ww3 and laugh hard

"Lemonade" is just an abstraction for whatever product or service rather than strict meaning so its okay if he's referring about something else as long as it is clear.
That said, I doubt he can make any valid point in which atomizing the market because "if someone can't afford it no one should" fixes it. I can hardly think of anything that gets better from destroying it.

Explain why.

I did.

{1} Culling fraud, fraud apologia, together with their fraudsters and fraud apologists in suits & curated CVs.

{2} Fixing the social contract between all social classes regardless of income brackets and wealth, within econometric frameworks that dictate our world and affordability (accessibility, PPP).

That; or nuclear winters, or world wars, and global collapse.

They just also tend to choose not to.

Bullshit, though you know that already.
More fraud apologia.

All you are writing is schizo babble. I knew I shouldn't have bothered replying to you.

There's no fraud in making a subpar product. You are free to not buy it. We've been over this a dozen posts ago minimum. Either keep up or don't bother me with your worthless replies at all.

Because it turns out niggers and mutts are fine
with buying piss.

There is another.

“I cannot counter-argue it, therefore it's [insert defamatory words]”

I'm correct, you're incorrect – eat shit, drop dead.

I cannot counter-argue it

You didn't even argue anything. You listed a bunch of actions rather than explaining WHY those actions should be enforced.

Bullshit

No it's not, retards think they're forced into buying processed shit when potatos and cabbage are cheap as fuck.

There's no fraud in making a subpar product.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH.

Because Man On TV ((())) tells them to

This. Make it illegal for people to not work harder.

You were given a century to prove otherwise and you failed to do that. You have the reputation you earned.

Correct. There isn't.
You are free to not buy the subpar product.
Notice how you are conveniently not addressing this part.

kek, unfathomably based.

Where's the deception?

These are examples of more fraud apologia.

Do not mistake them for anything less.

By the way — this applies to subpart services as well.

Fraud & fraud apologists.

Nothing is stopping you from using the subpar services.
Notice how you can't form a retort to this simple fact.

You sound like a deranged lunatic.

They killed other competition. Or you can buy special lemonade with $7/bottle

Nothing is stopping you from using...

Fraud.
Apologia.

———

All, ALL “answers” that start with “it's your/their/our fault” — all, all, ALL of them are fraud apologia.

See it for what it is – the fraudsters' & fraud apologists' issue isn't subpar products or and services tainting our livelihoods.

That crap product?
Those predatory rules?
Those abusive clauses in the contract?

“It's your/their/our fault” for the fraudsters and their fraud apologists — NEVER that these subpar products/services exist in the first place as accessible!

See fraud apologia for what it is.

Jewish run central banks "capitalism"

ok moshe.

Correct, if you willingly buy something subpar, it's your fault. No one is forcing you to keep doing it.

Anyways, how do you know if a product or service is sub par without a superior product or service present to compare it to?

I used gamer girl bath water

Correct

Incorrect – eat shit, drop dead.

if you willingly buy something subpar, it's your fault. No one is forcing you to keep doing it.

Conjecture; That subpar mustn't exist in the first place for being subpar as [it] is.

Anyways, how do you know if a product or service is sub par without a superior product or service present to compare it to?

As a start; By not being a fraud apologist like you are enforcing quality differentiations to justify subpar products, services, predatory & abusive clauses as default.

But since you've established yourself as a fraud apologist, all you can do is deflect, pivot, change parameters.

Eat shit, drop dead.

If the poorest of the poor can't afford it, the rich mustn't have access to it either – foreign or and domestic.

Spin this con on the label, why don't ya.

You have addressed nothing.
I'll take that as you conceding.

“There's no fraud in making a subpar product.”

Correct, if you willingly buy something subpar, it's your fault. No one is forcing you to keep doing it.

I can keep going on forever as long as you don't explain who is forcing you to buy subpar products AND how do you know if a product is not subpar without a subpar product to compare it to.

Where's the deception?

Top is capitalism pre-1960
Bottom is (((capitalism))) where zog oppresses all competition

More fraud apologia.
These two don't want to accept why & how they're incorrect, so instead they prefer to eat shit knowing the consequences – they want to die.

For everyone else, don't ever let fraudsters & their apologists, ever again, twist your judgement like these two & others.

Subpar, predatory, abusive = Fraud
Fraud apologia = deception

Put it on your money, your prayer book, your guidelines, your ISO rulesets, wherever. It's enough.

More fraud apologia.

You can't define where the fraud in it is.

You are not addressing anything (over and over again, I must say), which mans you don't really have a point.

A) Who is forcing you to buy subpar products?
B) How do you know if something is or not subpar without a superior/inferior product to compare it to?
Two simple questions. Waiting for your answer to them.

Hey don't go speaking for everyone now. Us piss lovers are having a blast.

Germany was starving throughout the 1930s.

Fraud {noun} – the crime of getting money by deceiving people

t. Cambridge dictionary online

Fraud {noun} – [uncountable, countable] the crime of cheating somebody in order to get money or goods illegally

t. Oxford dictionary online

Fraud {noun} – (1) [a] deceit, trickery
specifically : intentional perversion of truth in order to induce another to part with something of value or to surrender a legal right; [b] an act of deceiving or misrepresenting

t. Merriam-Webster dictionary online

Fraud – [1] {variable noun} Fraud is the crime of gaining money or financial benefits by a trick or by lying; [2] {countable noun} A fraud is something or someone that deceives people in a way that is illegal or dishonest; [3] {countable noun} If you call someone or something a fraud, you are criticizing them because you think that they are not genuine, or are less good than they claim or appear to be

t. Collins dictionary online

Fraud {noun} – [1] the crime of using dishonest methods to take something valuable from another person; [2](a) a person who pretends to be what he or she is not in order to trick people; (b) a copy of something that is meant to look like the real thing in order to trick people

t. Britannica dictionary online

Fraud {noun} – [1] {countable, uncountable} the crime of deceiving people in order to gain something such as money or goods

t. Longman dictionary of contemporary English online

Law.com provides more: constructive fraud,
extrinsic fraud, fraud in the inducement, intrinsic fraud

Common denominators: crime, deception...
You can skip the shit eating part and drop dead directly.

by deceiving people

Again where's the deception?

Do people not see its both?

Why improve your product when it's selling?

Why worsen your product if it's not?

Communists have to imagine what they would do if they ran a business (apparently piss in bottles and force people to drink it) and then demand to control the entire economy

If I wanted lemonade I would buy cheap lemons grown in some shithole country and sugar produced from beets.

if I wanted to buy a product, I would do research into which is the best product for how much I'm willing to spend on said product.

Sounds like capitalism works for people with intelligence, and fails for retards who can't get a good job and have no fucking clue how to sustain themselves.

Cuba still has a Famine lmao.

More people have died under "communism"
Relity is it's all due to shit leadership like mao and pooh

We now have dedicated channels documenting all the crazy backwards shit that happened in Communist Russia and China. It's literally a click away, where you can learn about just how fucked communism really was. Often from people who lived it.

It's not good. It was never good. And it's still not good, your little commie darling Russia is fucking with Ukraine right now, and Democrats hate that. Not a great time to be a commie supporter.

Inflation and usury is not capitalism you communist piece of shit.

If only there was something between capitalism and communism.

Are you contrasting it to a command economy?
I live in the US and I don't trust the government to run education, healthcare, military, basically anything, so why would I all of a sudden trust them to centrally plan literally everything and remove my ability to have private property?
How does this not, in this current world, not just lead to "Eat the bugs, own nothing, be happy"?
Genuine question. I could theoretically be in favor of a command economy, if I actually had faith in the government. But why should I accept it under these, real world, circumstances?

I forgot to mention, just so it's clear: all religious books condemn fraud & deception.

A) Who is forcing you to buy subpar products?
B) How do you know if something is or not subpar without a superior/inferior product to compare it to?
Two simple questions. Waiting for your answer to them.

Nigger again you cannot describe where the deception in it is.

By omission of that fact you yourself are deceiving.

It's a strawman for commies to make up shit to hate on capitalism.

The REAL facts here is capitalism figured out how to make frozen concentrated lemonade which made lemonade available YEAR ROUND, which is a fucking miracle of science. A seasonal fruit, now available year round even to flyover states. Prices stabilized to boot, hedging against bad weather and harvests, both allowing the producer to profit AND the consumer to have cheap all year access. And it's pasteurized to boot! Making it safe for consumption. Turns out you niggers wanted more convenience, so they unfroze it and bottled it for your easier consumption. You can still buy it condensed though. And yes, you can also do it yourself anytime thanks to world wide growers helping to smooth out the supply.

(technically it was the orange that first did that, but lemons are now part of it, as is most fruits)

What your describing is Jew corporatism , not capitalism, Jew filth

all religious books condemn fraud & deception

ALL of them, Mr. Memeflag?

This.

A) What is forcing you to buy subpar products?

Existence, counciousness, eudaimonia, the tyranny of distance/logistics, the fraudulent fiscal+monetary woowoo determining purchasing-power parity between continents & countries, fraudulent market forces, and all the other subpar products/services because of immediate/urgent need by the sheer iniquity of not being lawful nor legal to cull personally those responsible.
See more >B) How do you know if something is or not subpar without a superior/inferior product to compare it to?

I know something is subpar, without a superior/inferior product to compare it to, because of the aforementioned answers (apparently, you need to consume shit to convince yourself it's worse than bread, and instead you'll drop dead). That subpar products/services are used as benchmarks to justify skimming/surging (another form of fraud) via the price quality superior products & services instead of being at the same price as the subpar ones.

If the poorest of the poor can't afford it, the rich mustn't have access to it either – foreign or and domestic.

Eat shit with your casuistry, I've already answered multiple times, fuckin' fraud apologist.

Existence, counciousness, eudaimonia, the tyranny of distance/logistics

None of those things are forcing you buy anything, much less a subpar product.

I know something is subpar, without a superior/inferior product to compare it to, because of the aforementioned answers

Not an a real answer both because it's not a real answer in and on itself and because "the aforementioned answer" is not a real answer either.
Here's proof of that not being a real answer:
Pic related, is this a subpar cable?

I'll ask again
A) Who is forcing you to buy subpar products?
B) How do you know if something is or not subpar without a superior/inferior product to compare it to?
Two simple questions. Waiting for your answer to them.

each system that is being taken will further the wealthies agendas and you plebeians wont do shit, its because youre retards. thats right and crying about it wont help anyone.

See more

Huh, you really want to go down that path?

subpar
adjective
(also sub-par)
uk
/sʌbˈpɑːr/ us
/ˈsʌb.pɑːr/
worse than the usual or expected standard

How do you have something that's worse than the usual and expected standard without something that's the usual and expected standard, hm?

None of those things are forcing you buy anything, much less a subpar product.

Yes they do, fraud.

Not an a real answer both because it's not a real answer in and on itself and because "the aforementioned answer" is not a real answer either.

“It's not a real answer because everything you've written I cannot counter-argue, so instead I'm pivoting, evading, changing the questions because that's how I've been taught when I'm in a crisis from admitting error.”

Pic related, is this a subpar cable?

Yes.

I'll ask again
A) Who is forcing you to buy subpar products?
B) How do you know if something is or not subpar without a superior/inferior product to compare it to?
Two simple questions. Waiting for your answer to them.

I have answered them, here:

Yes they do

No they don't.
Explain how those things make you buy stuff that I don't buy.

It's not a real answer because everything you've written I cannot counter-argue

counter-argue

There's nothing to counter argue. It's not an answer because you didn't answer anything. Saying "I know something because I know something" is not an answer.

Yes.

How do you know?

I'll ask again
A) Who is forcing you to buy subpar products?
B) How do you know if something is or not subpar without a superior/inferior product to compare it to?
Two simple questions. Waiting for your answer to them.

You forgot to add the shareholder saying that he'll sue them if they stop adding piss because it'd cut into profits

so instead I'm pivoting, evading

This is a projection though. You keep moving the goalposts.

changing the questions

I've asked the exact same two questions for a dozen posts. Here, I'll ask them again

A) Who is forcing you to buy subpar products?

B) How do you know if something is or not subpar without a superior/inferior product to compare it to?

I expect actual answers to this, not pivoting and evading.

Capitalism is a communist term.

I've already answered multiple times

No you haven't, if the product is advertised honestly where's the fucking deception?

Advertised honestly

You mean the same as the originial but has hidden crushed insects now?
If you want to compete you have to buy 1 million cows and a factory

No they don't.

Explain how those things make you buy stuff that I don't buy.

Yes, they do.
No, I'm not going to continue your fraud apologia of “it's our/their fault”.
We've established already you're an apologist for fraud and fraudsters.
All there's left is the cull.

How do you know?

I know, with ease.

I'll ask again

I've answered here: >This is a projection though.

Although it isn't, fraud apologia & the innate tendency to commit fraud is a pathogen.

No you haven't, if the product is advertised honestly where's the fucking deception?

“If”
See people? This is how you treat those that commit fraud & their fraud apologists.
They know they're adequate enough to be used as manure, nothing else, because that's all they're consuming.

And here: If the poorest of the poor can't afford it, the rich mustn't have access to it either – foreign or and domestic.

even a king 100s of years ago couldnt coprehend the idea of a farmer boy going to a buffet then buying himself a machine for endless free entertainment (tv)

No, I'm not going to continue because everything you've written I cannot counter-argue, so instead I'm pivoting, evading.

Sweet!

I know, with ease.

Sweet, more evading and pivoting.
By the way that is literally the BEST cable that exists, so you were wrong about your judgement of it being subpar no matter the method you used.

I've answered here

No, you haven't answered.
You are not even quoting the right post, in fact.

Although it isn't

Considering all you've been doing so far is EXACTLY what you accuse others of doing, yes it is a projection.

“If”

Tough luck, I never said that. That's a different poster.
But you just admitted that there's no fraud despite you making a blanket statement that subpar products are a fraud. So there's that.

If the poorest of the poor can't afford it, the rich mustn't have access to it

And I already asked you to explain why to which you... big surprise, didn't explain why.

Your posts andarguments are subpar, that makes you a fraud I guess. They shouldn't exist.

Asking again:
A) Who is forcing you to buy subpar products?
B) How do you know if something is or not subpar without a superior/inferior product to compare it to?

real capitalism has never been tried

The last time usury was banned was under feudalism

Not one of those alternative meat/insect protein companies has been successful.

Because they're advertised as such and no one buys it.

National Socialism