Wow this is like a true panorama of every dorm-room tier argument, straw man, and melodramatic framing compiled into one post complete with even the most stereotypical vocabulary of the the phone-it-in tier partisan argumentation.
And no, there may be cases where government regulation may be legitimately within the purview of the federal government. However, even the most deluded of our populace can see that the government hase become bloated and ridiculous. Bureaucrats pathologically seek bigger budgets and more authority whether they need it or not and it has produced a monstrous and bloated hellscape from an administrative standpoint.
How did it get this way? Shameless whoring of tragedies and hard-luck stories to convince people to turn over more authority to this government. And does it ever actually help? No all it results in is me having to fill out 50 forms eith three different agencies to get nothing done and me having to finance the purchase of fat women buying crab legs and Little Debbies.
Your argument is a policy argument. The type of shameless shit peddled to get things passed. Of course there are always dozens of policy arguments one way or another. Instead it is more logical to look at the state of the government and its programs... are they effective? Are they efficient? Have they done what was promised in the past? Are they costly? Does their effect make up for the cost?
The answer to all of these questions is a manifest and laughable "no" and everyone knows it. So in this light you'd have to be fuller than a zeppelin on crack smoke to think these old well worn arguments for more programz would ever find fertile ground. You people should know when to stop when you are ahead you have already created a monstrous and frankly insane bureaucratic state that is a decades long process to even try to unwind and make sense of.