Bill to make pornography a federal crime introduced by GOP senator

It's not them going after the money involved that worries me. They will use this as another way to persecute ordinary men further. They will send people into your home, invade your privacy, scan your computers, looking for wrong think. They will create an entire industry to come after YOU, not the porn producers. If they wanted to go after the money, this bill would look very different.

you are doing wrong, then you won't reproduce

Jamal is in prison for breaking into a warehouse to steal copper wiring and being in possession of PCP. He has 6 kids.

Your post is based on assumption, not the wording of the bill you didn’t read.

die in a pile of shit, hippie new age faggot.

your time on earth is coming to an end. will you give satan a downward doggy when you fall into hell?

I don't believe I was ambiguous in what I said. I'm White but the future belongs to the people that show up. That's not a question of porn being a problem but of people creating conditions where Jamal can reproduce. What is the universe trying to say here? hum, I wonder. What are the solutions. It's really just going down a totally different rabbit hole. It isn't going after men for having a porn addiction.

What? A downward doggy. lol Shut up idiot.

I read an article, they are coming after you for possession of porn.

So you read an opinion and took it as fact instead of going to the source, but you don’t feel shame about being this fucking stupid?

Not when the judges view all material as lacking those values by default

This will just force pornographers to produce porn with much more artistic merit

Art requires deregulation to thrive. Art is an inherent tool of rebellion, dissent. To control art is to view it as a legitimate threat to your power

You MUST have a society of people addicted to substances. You can do NOTHING to try to disconnect people from dangerous addiction because FREEDOM

Miserable people wallowing in misery and angry if others don't grow into miserable people like their own. Porn has zero benefits. Zero. There is nothing lost if it is banned.

my cuck, tranny and BLACKED porn is about rebelling against the system!

That's cool buddy, but your rebellion is fucking retarded and run by jews hoping to ruin lives.

Art isn't a justification for being an ill-intentioned piece of shit.

Republicans love censorship
It will start with porn but then places like this will be targeted too
But bible thumping Anon Babble puritans will cry based meanwhile they wanted to kill themselves because the site was down for a few days.

ChatGPT summery"

The Interstate Obscenity Definition Act (IODA), introduced by Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) and Representative Mary Miller (R-IL), aims to redefine "obscenity" within the Communications Act of 1934, particularly concerning content transmitted via interstate or foreign communications.
Key Provisions of the IODA:

1. Redefinition of Obscenity: The bill proposes a new definition of "obscenity" that includes visual depictions which:
◦ Appeal to the prurient interest in nudity, sex, or excretion;
◦ Depict or describe actual or simulated sexual acts with the intent to arouse or gratify sexual desires; and
◦ Lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

2. Removal of Intent Requirement: The bill seeks to eliminate the requirement that obscene content must be transmitted with the intent to abuse, threaten, or harass, thereby broadening the scope of what can be prosecuted under federal law.

Impact on Law Enforcement and Private Possession:
While the IODA focuses on the transmission of obscene material across state or national lines, it does not explicitly authorize law enforcement to conduct searches in private homes solely to find pornographic material on personal computers. However, by broadening the definition of obscenity and removing certain intent requirements, the bill could potentially lead to increased prosecutions related to the distribution or receipt of such material. It's important to note that, under current federal law, private possession of obscene material is generally not criminalized, but the distribution or receipt of such material can be.

Conclusion:

The IODA seeks to strengthen federal obscenity laws by redefining what constitutes obscene material and removing specific intent requirements for prosecution. While it does not directly authorize police to search private homes for pornography, its broader definitions and lowered thresholds for prosecution could have implications for how obscenity laws are enforced, particularly concerning the distribution and receipt of such material over the internet.

Look! An anti-porn bill! What does this omen portend?

I don't support Harrison Bergeron as a goal or ideal for society. Masking mediocrity as "unity" and "purity" only serves to protect the same elites from exposure by detaching them from sexual degeneracy

People voted for Trump because they wanted him to fix the economy, and stop illegal immigration. He is straying far from that path.

a man is looking at a shadow of a bird

ChatGPT

Garbage in, garbage out. Great example of this btw.

redefine obscenity

No. It’s literally basing the definition of obscenity off of current precedent and just codifying it into federal law. The wording is directly from Miller v. California. It’s not a redefinition; the definition was decided by the Supreme Court over 50 years ago.

Imagine fighting on behalf of the talmudists who want you miserable and destitute.

"purity"

just not lying to people or trying to ruin their lives

Interesting bar to set.

I'll take ChatGPT opinion over yours any day. The fact of the matter is, they have worded it to go after anyone who holds or trades porn over the internet. If they wanted to go after the producers for money, they would have worded as such.

The leftist is a fascist dupe for globalist owning elite pedophiles.

How fucking embarrassingnitnis to be a pedo-fascist leftoid idiot.

political correctness is fascism

Yes, leftists are gullible puppets of the globalists. I'm a centrist. I can think for myself, and I say this falls under thought crimes, and free speech. If they wanted to go after people making money producing porn, the wording of the bill would be very different. I don't need christcucks from Utah telling me what content I can view or how to think.

I'd like to be a lolbertarian, problem is I superimpose my values on others and then it just doesn't work because my people are mostly degen shitters irl. I dont look at porn even though it is legal, but I could see someone doing it responsibly. However you all (generalizing, maybe not you) let it ruin yourselves and by extention our society. So you cannot be trusted with it. We tried, we failed at not being coomer degens. It leaks into real life more and more, every decade it gets worse and pebetrates the divide into irl further.
Reasonable for society to ban it to save itself from the degen slide. Free society is great, but it has the attribute of the most immoral shit rising to the top over time. Fascist action is necessary when this rot gets out of control.

Anon, ChatGPT is just an aggregate of MSM articles when it comes to current events. I gave you the actual case law the bill is based on. That’s not an opinion.

You’re not able to think for yourself, and that’s pretty sad (though I doubt you’re capable of understanding why).

go after anyone who holds or trades porn

holds

Even ChatGPT didn’t say this. It’s literally about interstate commerce (trading and receiving).

Myanus is still alive anon died

Multiply that misdirection for all politics

Why does Anon Babble suck jew dick so much nowadays?

Faggot, with this bill, they will treat you just like anyone trading CP. They will abuse this if it becomes law. Republicans really don't want to stay in power. Banning abortion, now porn? I wish everything wasn't so black and white, politically. There is no middle ground of reason for any of these idiots.

There won’t be any porn to view. Get your mind straight. You’re literally an addict.

You're a faggot, OP.

It's a red herring.

Shut up kike worshipper
Go pray to ya boi the Jesus the Jew.

You're a roastie whore with NO EGGS!!!!

Porn is so ubiquitous that everyone assumes everyone else watches it in a daily basis. I haven’t watched porno in years and retards itt are saying the cops are going to come after me.

Go read you bible or some shit, you fuckin' nut.

Not a christcuck, you faggot kike

Drugs were never really legal

Wrong, retard. Kys, I want your faggot ass to give me all the classical laws where drugs were prohibit, you can go from ancient egypt or cuneiform civilizations until now.
Go, do it! You can use AI if you want to, fellow lazy fuck.

you must be religious

See: >The issue with porn isn’t morality, but psychological damage done to men.

Go buy a few usb drives and download all the porn you can

Oh, angry roastie. I see, you're right, I did get that wrong.

I MUST ARCHIVE MY JEWISH PACIFICATION SLOP!

Don't forget to download the talmud on there too

I can't wait till some loon waltz into Congress with an automatic weapon and sprays indiscriminately

I think anything beyond VHS tapes should be illegal. I’m not joking. It’s the constant switching and changing from one scene to another that causes psychological damage to men. You can easily jump from scene to scene on a DVD (or on other digital formats like webms). That’s a lot harder in VHS. DVD would be a compromise because you’re still somewhat limited.

yeah instead of banning chemicals that turn males into infertile gender confused freak shows, let's target porn

humanity wins again

Are humans really so immature that nudity needs to be criminalized? Why does it matter if I want to walk around, swinging my 7" BWC? As long as I'm not whipping kids in the face with it or getting my ass sweat on a public park bench, who cares?

banning my precious porno is just a step to far! They must pay!

The coomers are really getting riled up.

Drugs are illegal so a priest class of doctors can give it out to you at their discretion. If they really wanted to solve the problem of people ODing from fent, they have standardized strengths of opioids that abusers could buy. Like an ABC store for drugs. They don't actually care if people die from opioids, is about power over people, and money. No, I'm not a drug addict but I can see.

Porn is the leading cause of transgender Ian and you can’t convince me otherwise. All of this tranny shit started when Pornhub went live. The first wave of trannies where just entering adolescence at the time. That’s not a coincidence.

based

Utah

I can assure you that represenative probably watches from a chair. Mormons are peaked cuck, and there's a reason why we killed their founder in Missouri.

Why don't you go back to your Amish farm, and leave the people who aren't Luddites alone. I bet this Amish are just now discovering VHS. You should feel right at home.

No, the leading cause of transgenderism is that people don't have the right to freedom of association. We have lost the right to shun people we don't like. You don't have to associate with a porn addict but you need to stay out of their business. Don't worry, if their porn addiction doesn't allow them to reproduce, the universe will sort it out in time.

Because those people are destroying themselves and they live in my society.

is there a word that gets tossed around meaninglessly more often than fascism? capitalism maybe

“Rape” is up there. “Sex trafficking” as well. The former is practically a myth while the latter is just prostitution.

The conversation needs to switch from “porn makes baby Jesus cry” to one about mens psychological wellbeing and porns impact on society. I think a lot of men (perhaps even the majority) are porn addicts and don’t even realize it. How could they when porn use is basically universal, private, and totally secret? Of course that will never happen because it would be good for men.

It all centers on internet porn, not just porn as an amorphous entity. The media type matters quite a bit. DVD porno shops should be legal. That solves the major issues of porn and dials it back to early 2000’s level.

Political correctness is authoritarianism enacted by the sensitive, the power hungry, the fake puritans and the hypocrites that you don't want anywhere near power.

Isn't this the same guy who introduces a new bill like this every year? And further, why does this bother coomer-brained idiots? It never passes.
Because if you haven't noticed, people who hyper fixate on sex and gooning go completely insane. They provide no merit and don't even identify themselves with their work and actions. Instead they chop off children's genitals and traffic them.

I am not some puritan that despises those who have sex or desire it or look for ways to satisfy themselves. But a man or woman must be more than this.
Freedom of speech always contained exceptions for obscenity, for seeing a naked woman has nothing to do with petitioning your government or living well or truth. It is not appropriate to display this in the venues of children.

Nigga, white women don't need any coaxin' to do some nasty, degenerate shyt. That shyt ingrained into their DNA. You know how many white women I've encountered that fuck their dogs? I've even had some cute lily white biches lick my asshole -- and they did it gladly. White women be nasty AS HELL, yo, so stop sitting there on some shyt like the jews made white women degenerate, they BEEN degenerate.

Anon, addiction requires that it impacts your life to the point that you're aware of it and want to quit, but can't. This shit is just temperance 2.0. Nearly every man watches pornography. Some are unhealthy users, just like some people are unhealthy drinkers.

Police the producers, sure. Make sure there's no trafficking or grooming. But Why are we even dancing with the idea of thought crimes? This neo-puritan shit is so weird to me. Is Anon Babble this contrarian? Are parents so unable to install fucking parental controls on their ipads? Come the fuck on people. Your parents had access to more smut than you thought. Movies have had sex scenes and tits in them for decades. Social media is breaking your brains, not tits.

People who fixate on alcohol also go insane. In the "Land of the Free," the government should provide you liberties. And if you misuse your liberties and start sexually assaulting people or chopping off your kids dick, they ought to brick you.

they want to go after the people addicted to it

Not my problem/Day of the oven soon pornkike zionazi/Kys

Imagine the massive, CREAMY, meatball marinara sub braps that slap outta that eggy stinker...

chefskiss

can you explain what psychological damage is being done with porn

and be very specific please

akleg.gov/basis/get_documents.asp?session=33&docid=27774
1. Male subjects demonstrated increased callousness toward women.
2. Subjects considered the crime of rape less serious.
3. Subjects were more accepting of non-marital sexual activity and non-coital sexual practices such
as oral and anal sex.
4. Subjects became more interested in more extreme and deviant forms of pornography.
5. Subjects were more likely to say they were dissatisfied with their sexual partner.
6. Subjects were more accepting of sexual infidelity in a relationship.
7. Subjects valued marriage less and were twice as likely to believe marriage may become obsolete.
8. Men experienced a decreased desire for children, and women experienced a decreased desire to
have a daughter.
9. Subjects showed a greater acceptance of female promiscuity.

1 and 2 are definitely positives, 7 doesn't seem related to porn at all
everything else is bad yea

If you are doing wrong, then you won't reproduce or push your species forward through innovation.

According to the Fisherian Runaway mechanism, in many species, it is the females who determine whether a particular male is permitted to mate. As observed in the prominent example of the peacock, male peacocks have developed traits that are detrimental to their survival in the context of natural selection, such as long tails, bright and colorful feathers, and a lack of camouflage. These ornamental characteristics have been selected over generations simply because they are attractive to females. This dynamic does not operate in reverse, as in this case, female peacocks lack such ornamentation, which means that, inversely to the males, they didn't need to appeal to the opposite sex to reproduce.

The conclusion drawn here is that females of a species, when unrestricted, can select for traits that may be disadvantageous to their male counterparts.

Here's where I ask you a question: If you were to reproduce, how can you be certain that, rather than possessing beneficial genetic material, you are not merely conforming to female-imposed biological standards that serve no practical purpose beyond ornamentation?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisherian_runaway

This was right above it, so it does seem to stem from porn

The following observations were noted regarding young adults exposed to pornography compared to the control group

your copy paste response doesn't really say anything

you aren't citing any actual statistics nor firsthand examples

The conclusion drawn here is that females of a species, when unrestricted, can select for traits that may be disadvantageous to their male counterparts.

Cool argument in favor of white genocide pornkike faggot

Cool argument in favor of white genocide pornkike faggot

How the fuck did you reach that conclusion? That is some seriously convoluted shit.

How the fuck did you reach that conclusion?

Because your opinion and flag indicate to me that you're muslim shitskin filth

stopping the exploiting of sexuality in a capitalistic manner is fascism

providing something natural that people want is explotation

opinion

How? I derived reasonable conclusions from observable and substantiated evidence. What opinion have (You) offered?

flag

That's very rich coming from you, Leroy Hernandez. Trump's coming for the likes of you.

Smacks of a bill created specifically to die so that people can say they did something.
In the unlikely event it should pass I'd love to see the NSA cache of the browsing history of those who vote for it.

The conclusion drawn here is that females of a species, when unrestricted

Where in nature does this ever happen you circumcized cucked ape?

AcPeds is a religious/political group and their agenda has largely been anti-trans and anti vaccine advocacy via filing amicus briefs with the Supreme Court. I'm not going to claim to be familiar with that shit but the studies they're citing here in this paper are tenous at best.

I mean, whatever. People will make up their minds based on their personal virtues and push it on others. It's always been that way. The current supreme court has been massively pro 1A, even in obscenity cases. With the current challenges to its legitimacy I wonder if they'll vote party lines or stick to what they've been pushing over the last 20 years. Based on the fact that the age verification laws haven't been granted cert in their court, a federal verification law would likely go through without much issue.

when you say "Male subjects demonstrated increased callousness toward women." YOU AREN'T SAYING ANYTHING NIGGER

learn how statistics and studies work before trying to make an argument

read the ID anon I'm not the other guy you replied to

the point still stands

It's an official study from .gov website you literal talking, brainless, penis and balls with eyes and lips

porn is natural

Didn’t know cameras grew on trees.

You just own the fucking world, don't you. Hey, everyone, the owner of the world has visited my humble thread on porn. Such an honor.

Nigga forgot Mr. Johnny and his contributions to the world.

Ghost

modern fedora wearers

sex is natural
looking at someone having sex is natural

If you want percentages specifically, say so. I'm sure the basis for that conclusion is in there, but I can't be fucked to find it for you.

Yes and this is why there are law prohibits things like being drunk in public or driving while intoxicated, even if there is minor inconvenience to people who are otherwise not really much of a threat.
Any porn ban that passes would be along similar lines. If you share it with children or teach it in schools, then it is an issue. It is only that modern communication allows children to access most anything and this could inconvenience you is why there is conflict. But you must realize there is a sensible middleground somewhere.

It is exploitation to teach children gambling or get them addicted to drugs. It is exploitation to sexualize them or have adults try to convince them to engage n the act, teach them in ways that are not just about the biology of the process.

psychological harm

Oh the humanity someone might see a titty how horrible anything but that

the sex you see in porn couldn’t be further from natural.
and at no point in human history was it considered normal to masturbate while watching another couple have sex

George Carlin sucks
I tought he was cool until I paid attention to the details
He is just like Bill Burr, cowards who can't blame the jew.
Carlin even spoke about white bankers!!! hahahah!!!! the audacity!
And Burr is the same, he don't have the guts to attack progressives it's always white women or white men.

Where in nature does this ever happen you circumcized cucked ape?

In the case of the peacock, as I mentioned
In the case of the pheasant
In the case of fish
In the case of mammals
In the case of amphibians and reptiles

We're not an exception. Get over it, retard.

something natural people want

so everyone wants to watch other people have sex instead of having sex themselves?

no one can have sex/make porn/partake in prostitution but faggot jews and their selected porn pets

Is not providing something natural that people want, it's stopping sometime natural that people want, you piece of shit jew, go die

Which of those animals gatekeeps its females and forces them to have sex with other species?

my highly produced and filmed online porn I can stream directly to my phone is natural

because I said so

No it isn’t. It is not natural by its very definition. I’m not even getting into the mortality of it (I don’t care) but objectively there is nothing really natural about porn other than two people fucking. Everything else is entirely artificial and reliant on a logistic network and industry to make happen.

The real conversation needs to be about how you are an angry roastie that wants to punish men because they would rather masturbate to porn then fuck your ugly, old ass. It's about raising you sexual marketplace value.

Literally, if men weren't meant to masturbate, nature, god, whatever wouldn't have given men foreskin. Men literally evolved foreskin to aid in masturbation, clear the mind, and get the poison out.

All you're looking for is power over men. Fuck you, and I don't care if I make you or god cry.

so you didn't read the study you copy pasted

and at no point in human history was it considered normal to masturbate while watching another couple have sex

I know groups of irl people where I can do that nigger lmao

Yes please. Americans suffering is always amusing.

>Subjects developed an accurate view of reality

muh psychological poopoopeepee

Fuck you, and I don't care if I make you or god cry.

You aren't wanted by either and I don't know what compels you to think otherwise. They just want you out of their sight.

if you think showing sex for entertainment is a new thing you're more retarded than a monkey

anything the goverment says isn't true unless it fits what I believe in

I'm getting really tired. I'm not saying you specifically are doing this, but people can't call other people stupid for blindly being sheep and believing a CDC paper on vaccines and then say this shit about some random paper by a lobbying group that happens to be posted on .gov domain. Read it, read the studies, and read countervailing points. I'm not an expert, a developmental psychologist, or anything related, but it feels politically motivated to me and some cursory research into the group reveals a lot of bias. Personally I want a more objective source because I mean, maybe porn IS bad for you? But I'm fucking fine and all my friends are fine. Anecdotally there doesn't seem to be much issue outside of personal guilt which is its own thing.

I genuinely believe that there is just too much information for anyone to really figure out what the fuck is going on anymore. People choose a side and just follow it based on faith.

to be an addict you have to want to quit

What the fuck did I just read?

What the do you mean by that? Are you slow, by any chance? What's the point of your question?

I agree with your sentiments. But I will not play fair with these subhuman (((people))).

Well, apparently, you might get porn taught in schools and children convinced to take puberty suppressing hormones or castrated. You might get children trafficked.

It is one thing to care if children see some old greek statue. It is another for them to visit Anon Babble and be taught it by those who they are supposed to be obedient to.

Which of the animals you listed restricts its females sexuality in a way that forces them to select for dysgenic traits?

Freedom is about personal responsibility. If a person destroys themselves with their own freedom, that is on them. People with no will power deserve to be weeded out.

Republicans should be making pro-pedo laws, republicans making anti pedo bills is hypocritical, republicans came back from epstein's island so they should corrupt their legislation the Epstein way

firsthand examples

give me anecdotes!

what exactly do you mean with "porn taught in schools" anon

PACIFICATION

So how many revolutions have you started? Lmao

what he posted is just citing other documents
it's not first hand information

he basically posted a high school report as a fact

I know groups of irl people where I can do that nigger lmao

Nobody is saying it doesn’t happen. We’re saying it’s not normal. 99.9% of humanity does not partake in these activities.
The question isn’t whether it’s new. The question is whether it’s natural.
Sex exists to reproduce. Not to put on a show for a small handful of degenerates.

it’s natural!

no it isn’t

well if you think it’s new than you’re an idiot!

Nice goalpost shift. The “sex industry” has been around for a very long time. This is historically undeniable. However, being able to blast hardcore pornography for free directly to your phone is very new. That being said the popularity of the “sex industry” is directly linked to the rise and decline of a civilization. Generally speaking the more popular things like pornography, prostitution and such are the closer to implosion a nation is. This is, again, not even approaching the morality of porn. These are objective facts.

I actually do think females have too much control over traits that get selected. I'm all for artificial wombs to even things up a bit.

being able to blast hardcore pornography for free directly to your phone is very new

which is only an issue because of irresponsible parents

No one is teaching porn in school you lunatic. As for the tranny thing that is an issue of mental illness

muh trafficking

I don’t give a fuck about beaners and saying you might get something is not a cause to ban things you retard. You might get hit by a bus today you are a retard after all we shouldn’t ban busses just because you are a retard.

visit Anon Babble

Anime website faggot and you have to be 18 to visit this place watch your kids retard don’t let them play in the street with the bus

cutting your nose off to spite your face

I mean whatever dude, it's your own personal liberty. I agree with
If a society cannot exist with freedoms in place, then what even is the fucking point? I'm pro 2A, pro individual property ownership for this reason, and pro free speech as well. You can't just pick one.

If you have a fight to pick with some boogeyman then whatever but stay out of my life. I don't want people advertising porn in schools anymore than you do. Frankly, I don't want it advertised at all, same with alcohol or even prescription drugs. It should be an entirely personal choice that an individual engages with in the first place, not pushed on anyone.

what's funny is that these laws aren't doing shit because anyone can take an image and share it in fucking telegram and the government can't do shit about it

You've made up your mind, already. There's no convincing you. If you were actually curious, you'd go "oh, a government link making these claims. Let me investigate and possibly change my worldview."

it has .gov at the end so it must be true!

Which of the animals you listed restricts its females sexuality

Mallards, elephant seals, chimpanzees, dolphins, fruit flies, water striders, and many more. All of the males of the previously mentioned species use coercive mating tactics.

in a way that forces them to select for dysgenic traits?

Not sure what you meant by this part. Were you asking for species whose males restrict the females, and as a byproduct end up causing dysgenic traits to accumulate?

which is only an issue because of irresponsible parents

Didn’t say anything about parenting or kids being exposed to porn but this response is quite telling. At what point do you look at the pornographers (mostly jewish) and start asking if what they are doing is fine? Especially when they don’t follow existing laws to begin with and those laws being made for when online porn just simply wasn’t a thing and they know it. Yes, them being Jewish is an important factor because many of them are on record saying they make this stuff to crash cultures.

let me investigate

POSSIBLY change my worldviews

you're room temp iq and allergic to reading

Florida was accused of 'banning books' by democrats and leftists because they removed some books from public schools.
The main example given by those in favor of the removal included definitions and instruction on 'pegging' or the use of strapons (fake phalluses) for sexual pleasure. This included an illustrated depiction of minors and personal accounts of the author.

There are countless similar stories from across the US, where students and parents have read homework assignments or excerpts of works they were given to read by teachers. Some have included graphic sexual depictions. Others were given an essay to explore and describe their sexual desires was given to children of the age of 12.

Anime website faggot and you have to be 18 to visit

Anyone can visit freely. Nothing prevents a child from clicking a button except perhaps the vigilance of parents and other adults.

artificial wombs aren't necessary for that, removal of women's rights is enough

most of the porn I watch are just regular people who post it on twitter

why should it be illegal to post something that happens naturally and that you're watching consensually?

I actually do think females have too much control over traits that get selected

It's apparent if you think about it enough. Hell, it's even an established mechanism since Darwin suggested it, and Ronald Fisher expanded on it.

mentions mens health

be accused of being a woman

Your mind is totally destroyed, probably from porno.

You know the mind can’t really differentiate between having sex and watching porno. There are theories about pheromones and how they interact with the subconscious but that Oakes in comparison to the visual image of a slightly sweating girl, moaning and she’s pounded in her back while her tits rock back and forth.

To the mind a coomer, everything they do results in a massive amount of pussy (or probably boy pussy in your case). Subconsciously they’re constantly getting laid because every decision they’ve ever made was correct. Their minds will never tell them to dial it back because no matter what it is it results in “sex.”

except perhaps the vigilance of parents and other adults.

we found the real culprit here

having no access to porn would be suffering

Pathetic

Were you asking for species whose males restrict the females, and as a byproduct end up causing dysgenic traits to accumulate?

No, that is what you are proposing by restricting human female sexuality for the sole purpose of breeding noahide niggers which does not occur anywhere else in nature, as it is a product of anti-nature ideology

This, it is IMPOSSIBLE to crush it as so much of it fucking exists.

bro if we make alcohol illegal we'll stop people from drinking

bro if we make prostitution illegal it will stop people from seeking whores

no, it will just create an unregulated market for a demand that will always exist because it's human nature

Ok kill the pedos running schools and watch your kids problem solved. I like porn because my fiancée will blow me as I watch it and it’s fun fuck you for wanting to take that from me all for your little shitskin offspring that you refuse to monitor. Are you suggesting that this place should be tied to your real identity just because you are an irresponsible parent.

Wow, Mexicans really are stupid.

there are multiple purposes to laws like this. At face value this is a "protect the kids" kind of bill. What it allows for, though, is selective enforcement against people that the government doesn't like. This goes in all directions.

Easiest analogy I have is something like speeding. Nearly everyone is speeding on the interstate. I can think of maybe one person in my life who goes at or under a 55mph limit at any time. The police are legally allowed to pull ANYONE going over 55. Doesn't matter what the flow of traffic is, they can pick you off no matter what. What they often do is selectively pick cars that they think will get them more charges e.g. drug, unregistered firearms, or suspended licenses (beater cars, sports cars, ricers etc.)

Selective enforcement will always be a thing. There's just no way to charge every single person who would violate a statute like this, just like it was impossible during prohibition. This just applies it to porn. If the govt doesn't like what you're up to, well here's a subpoena from your ISP that says you accessed a japanese basket weaving forum last week and read some MILF hentai. Oops, enjoy your charge!

yeah and if we make drugs illegal the society would stop rotting amirite!

Wrong. See:

For now on Ban republicans from making laws

Replace those legislators with psychologists who don't even believe in Making the world run on Anti-pedo mindset

Dont give republicans a single chance on what to do with laws, They are gonna corrupt the reality of sexual abuse more
and they will ruin our kids hormones by uneccesary regulation to make them chemically castarated

If the govt doesn't like what you're up to

In this case, nobody does. We all voted for it. So say bye to your jewish poison.

he's been trying over and over

Yeah, and it’s been mostly successful. If opioids were completely legal like half the country would be strung out in heroin. It happened in China. The solution was to crush the drug trade.

Like I said: Mexicans are fucking stupid.

opoids used to be legal some time ago anon...

Oi you got a VPN for that nudey lady m8?

Just because you feel strongly enough about something to make you suddenly go on a non-sequitur into a shit song, doesn't make you correct. It's actually proof you have a small brain and your taste in music further validated this since you relate to the heckin lyrics. It's bizarre and borderline schizophrenic.

You are religious by your admission that you have morals, promote morality and selectively pick religions to be against. You're fundamentally a Christian believing people are free to choose presupposing their belief that we aren't deterministic animals prone to bad behaviors as the result of the environment and genetics. You have not made one empirical critique of pornography and have zero materialist understanding of the world. You will never be a real atheist.

Pornography exerts a negative effect on the individual and society. People cannot regulate their behavior and minds perfectly because we are not perfect. Harmful behaviors like porn and homosexuality should be banned. If you weren't religious and moralbrained, you would see my statement as irrefutable and admit that I am right and you are wrong.

So it frees men from the feminist plantation, interesting. Really don't see the damage here except to whores that want a simp to extract wealth from, as society has clearly demonstrated that will condone female promiscuity (and likely porn creation/use) while demonizing men for jerking off instead of giving all their shit tona cheating slut. Poor argument.

by restricting human female sexuality

Yes, that's useful.

for the sole purpose of breeding noahide niggers

No, that's anti-human.
You probably misunderstood. I was not suggesting anything; I was describing reality as it is. The fact that you misinterpreted my words, and warped them in your mind to have conveyed a meaning other than what was intended, is not my problem -it's yours. Do you realize that the males of some species have adopted coercive mating tactics to offset the dysgenic traits caused by the Fisherian Runaway's female choice mechanism?

what negative effect porn has on people though

Do you realize that the males of some species have adopted coercive mating tactics to offset the dysgenic traits caused by the Fisherian Runaway's female choice mechanism?

Yes there is plenty of diversity in nature regarding biology, sexuality, courting, all kinds of weird shit happening but nowhere on Earth are there animals that restrict its females sexuality for the sole purpose of killing itself. That is not natural and I do -not- believe you could ever argue for such a thing in good faith.

You are brown and circumcized, goodbye

thanks for the thought provoking defense of porn and picture of noted anti-white comedian George Carlin, I'll file it securely my trash can

I told ya to address the incel issue reasonably. Now the incels will usher in Sharia Law by the end of the decade. They are too powerful.

World's oldest profession is 'exploitation' :^(

Amazing how Anon Babble becomes identical to feminists from tumblr on this stuff.

The problem with a lot of metal is that it isn't accessible to new listeners. Autists make music for themselves, which often sounds like a train wreck of "black metal" with no soul to it, and when an artist makes music more accessible, some elitist, artsy fag comes along and says it's too weak, or gay, or something not up to their standards.

We addressed the issue reasonably we told you to have sex.

If porn gets banned then Anon Babble gets banned (along with every other site that hosts nsfw media) and that means you and everyone else goes postal without your daily Anon Babble fix

what's even funnier is that trump hired a PORNSTAR to cheat on his wife and his supporters are lecturing you about morals

It was always going to be Sharia law because they're brown, circumcized SLAVES

it also makes men cucks and stops them from wanting kids

everyone else goes postal without your daily Anon Babble fix

Sure just like in April when nothing happened. This site has served its purpose anyway - in exposing you.

no I'm pretty sure people don't want kids because everything is unaffordable today and society sucks

not because of porn

It says "compared to the control group."

nowhere on Earth are there animals that restrict its females sexuality for the sole purpose of killing itself.

At no point in this entire thread did I state what you have just claimed I said. I mentioned that female sexuality is often restricted in several species for the sake of survival, not for "the sole purpose of killing itself," or whatever that means. However, for some reason, you seem hellbent on misrepresenting and misquoting my statements. You're being obtuse. Is it deliberate?

No. These sites would adapt and blur the images on U.S. IPs. And you can have ID verification that blurs the images until you enter in ID. Or allows the poster to say "it is or isn't SFW," and if they lie, it's akin to posting CP

There are many ways to make ID verification work, but Anon Babble niggers are lazy and just go "security issue!"

he can't into Burzum or Suffocation

gatekept/filtered

Actually, I spend most of my time in deep thought after reading news articles. I'll read six hours a day. If anything, that is my addiction. I view my sex drive as more of a thing that needs to be taken care of so I can move on to other things. You're obsessing about porn more than I am.

or whatever that means

being obtuse

Bye, nigger

That wasn’t my question.

this website doesn't make enough money to do something like that nigger

you say something about jews yet the porn I watch is normal people who just upload it to social media

Bye bye, Amerimutt.

What compels me to think otherwise is the butthurt roasties, in this thread, complaining about men watching porn, instead of having interest in them.

you think the sky is blue? heh. you know who also thinks the sky is blue? TUMBLR FEMINISTS. guess that makes you a TUMBLR FEMINIST

very basic logical fallacy, try again
this is not a libertarian board btw

hundreds of thousands, if not millions of software engineers kicked out of the job market

hurrrrr we can't find anybody to implement this

You could probably find somebody to do it for free just to put it on their resume.

I agree, choice is nice but pushing things on people isn't .