Is arguing about politics a waste of time?
Is arguing about politics a waste of time?
Yes Aristo said it's a waste of time for the young man
Yeah is a watste of time talking to woke and woke right
Yes.
Fuck off, kike
Politics is a waste of time.
Yuri Bezmenov would say that arguing with demoralized leftists is a waste of time because they have been rendered incapable of processing logic by communist subversion.
For most people, yes. Just like religion. Idiots do it to feel important despite having nothing worth saying. That's the real reason it should generally be avoided.
I’m sure his arguments boiled down to “you have to do the thing I say for le greater good of le society “
Politics is a question, and violence is the answer.
religion is the most important thing in the universe
Dumb people dont care about your fancy logic
Why worry so much about politics? We’re all slaves to the aliens, CIA, royal families, and military forces working deep underground anyway. They have UFOs and cloning and who knows what else. There’s nothing we can do to stop them anyway, and why should we? We might as well just keep working to contribute to the scientific experiments that will help maintain the existence of conscious life in this universe. Complaining and being bitter all the time doesnt help anyone. We should just enjoy the finite time we have while we can.
Yea, feelings don’t care about your facts. Democracy runs on psyops.
that mind over matter tattoo is hilariously ironic
uses logic to explain how logic is illogical
i too, am somewhat of a semantical dilettante.
No but you don't really go into a debate expecting the other side to give up on whatever they are arguing for right there. Rather they give their arguments, you give your arguments and both are judged by the audience.
it's very obvious it's all about being the first to seize the gun.
yes. real change only comes with violence
Huge waste of time. normies don't actually research anything, they listen(news), and repeat. That's it. No thought. You say something that goes against what they heard, they will rely on personal anecdotes if they have one, or simply just mock/ignore your points as being offensive somehow (ie. "that's racist, sexist, etc. etc. etc.).
Utterly pointless. I LOVE arguing. I don't know why, it just gives me a thrill, so I've argued with a lot of people in my life. I'd say only 5% of the people I've argued with, actually provide fair counter-points to what I say. I prefer arguing with extremists actually. Even though I disagree with a lot of what they say, usually extremists are at least decently well read on their opinion.
Liberalism is a mental disorder but 17 years of arguing with other people on the right led to Trump, Israel being unpopular with youth and White nationalist viewpoints becoming mainstream Republican policy.
new glow nigger psyop just dropped
Someone has to be personally affected to change their viewpoints the vast majority of times, otherwise you're wasting your breath. People know they are wrong but continue with however they feel regardless.
Arguments are for convincing the naive or the ignorant that are already vaguely on your side but not extremist enough to become more extreme in their views.
Occasionally it is useful to "argue" with an enemy publicly if you think you can make them look devious or insane in front of an ignorant crowd, or to provide a morale boost to your people or a morale hit to your enemies.
This is the way it is, and this is the way it always is, and always will be. You were never going to "win" without your enemies being killed, and the fact that anyone thought so is shocking beyond reason. Degenerates argue until they feel comfortable killing you and raping your children and not a second longer.
Your people will be judged as a group whether you choose to identity as a group or not.
This is the gayest thing anyone has said on this site, and maybe ever.
It did fucking not.
Those arguments were being made across the west by more people and smarter people, for a hundred fucking years and the "arguments" did nothing.
Suffering led to Trump, not the warning about suffering.
It's a time sink like vidya.
Some people enjoy 360 noscoping others to demonstrate coordination and familiarity with the game.
Others like debating to demonstrate rhetorical skill and familiarity with the topic.
They are important but most people don't really know shit about them or are passive regarding them anyway. It is a waste of time for random people to get heated at each other over them.
Yes. Mocking in as few words as possible is funner.
Absolutely, if you think you're affecting change of any kind. I just treat this like a 24 hour constantly rolling Soap Opera sort of, it's comfy content
Is arguing about politics a waste of time?
Yes! It took me a long time to realize it but yes. And mostly because /it does not matter what people say they think/. That is the least important thing by any metric. I do like understanding what people say they think and if I am asked I will explain what I think. I have no interest in changing people's mind about anything. History is not changed by people changing their mind. History is not a reasoning, democratic process.
Tribalistic fervor is vitally important to not having every single member of your culture put to the sword or led away in chains, even if that fervor relates only crudely to a core philosophy.
gay = happy
Keep seething I guess
If you're explaining, you're losing.
All politics originate from emotional argumentation. Logic and reason are justification.
If you want to convince someone of anything your argument needs to affect them emotionally.
I like Asimov but this seems like such a bitch argument by a compromised asshole happy with the system
Yes
We're in the middle level violence phase with a cult of conformity. The answer out of the lose lose dichotomy they're trying to set up is well established
No one wants to give up their chick fil a
yes. a close self examination will prove it from your own experience, no one changes their mind unless they already want to change their mind. they may not know in advance what they want to believe, but they are seeking it. a person who doesn't want to change their mind will never change their mind no matter what arguments or evidence you present. debate is a jewish trick and merely entertainment where two people who don't want to change their minds see who has more biased fans who also don't want to change their minds in the audience to automatically vote that their guy clearly won.
Always was and will always be.
I seemed so close to breaking through an iron skulled idiot about tariffs being retarded. He looked visibly defeated but just shrugged finishing with "We'll agree to disagree". Those are the words of someone who has nothing left to say but still wants to pretend there is a debate going on.
Actually, based on what the gospel itself is implying by basic ontology. Religion is controlled opposition to satan which is why its a direct product of the environment man finds himself in.
Religion is a manifestation of the flesh, which is why most people assume that the truth of the gospel itself is gnosticism when it isn't. Not everything physical is innately bad. The problem is we're spritually sick, and its leading to social cascades and war. These issues stem from personal pride as a matter of fact, and religion directly nurses it, which is why atheism/religion is actually a false dichotomy that satan devised so he could hide from the secular world.
The parable of the mustard seed logically hints to this, because Jesus forewarns that religion would infiltrate the faith and try to make it appear far larger than it actually is, with so many compromising elements that even the "birds" (enemies of God) would and could find comfort in its branches (sects). There is no division between believers. Believers know that while they're incapable of obeying the law to its required degree, they're justified by the blood of God anyway, and can recognize when someone simply believes the gospel and trusts god over themselves.
That doesn't inherently mean that the gospel is endorsing the idea that we just let ourselves go, or that its enabling rapists or any sort of worst case scenario strawman you could think of. Its just that religion with judaized logic is asking you to become God in the flesh, and thats precisely what Satan is trying to do. So naturally of course the people trying to do that would conspire to murder Christ upon meeting him, for failing to understand that there conditions cannot be fixed of their own accord.
Jude and Paul tell you that people are not the enemy, its demons, religious systems and philosophies of the world that are your combat enemy, and people are merely battlegrounds in that regard. Pride started all of this, grace will end it.
Those someones / "people" are called NPCs, but yeah Anon
You have to also realize that there are lots of people that prefer the lie. They know and they actively promote and protect that lie.
What a retarded faggot response lmao
I know a dude who thinks 'people are still on the fence about issue X.'.
Whatever, man. Argue on Quora if you want.
If some oldfag could post the 'Arguing on the internet is like competing in the Special Olympics...' meme.
If it were a waste of time, kikes wouldn't be trying so hard to shut us down.
Is arguing about politics a waste of time?
Pic Related (kinda).
Flawed Epistemology ≠ Mental Illness.
Sometimes it can lead to mental illness, but many things which can lead to mental illness— like anti-racialism— are encouraged in the wider political scene.
You may be tired, but that’s not my problem.
that's why you need to have illogical arguments and appeals to emotion in your tool kit as well.
Yes, it's crazy there are anons who sacrifice love, work and life just to argue on Anon Babble kek. It's very low IQ.
Just like with government there are people who need to be told what to do in a spiritual sense, hence religion.
If you can't understand that then you have lost sight of the realities of life.
Yes.
Read Stop Reading the News by Rolf Dobelli
For you and yours, yes. But that's because your ideas suck.
These people don't understand that there's a time and place for arguing politics, they will start that shit out of nowhere in avenues of life where it is inappropriate and then crash out when told to cut it out. Then they twist boundaries into this shit about how people won't change their minds.
yuri memenov
Sometimes yes and sometimes not.(agree to disagree)
I’ve said it when I don’t want to go down the jews and blacks rabbit hole with normal people around.
Homosexuality is the first step on the road to sodomy (nigger worship).
single mother lesbians with nigger children
Your pic only confirms what I know.
My neighbour's daughter came out as a lesbian and then a few months later came home with a nigger baby. What kind of lesbian is that? The mystery of iniquity is literal nigger worship.
You're not wrong. But the plebbit spacing is atrocious. On this site, please assume that people are capable of following a sentiment without needed a space after every sentence.
That said:
Be Girl
Easily manipulated
"Just be with a girl!"
"So much easier and safer!"
Become Lesbian.
All Lesbians are leftist.
Can't be in the Lezzie Cult if you're not.
Be Lesbian Leftist.
Get approached by nigger.
"Lemme fuhg, bish."
Uhm, I can't, I'm a lesbian with a girlfriend.
Bish, yew raysiss.
NO! I'M TOTALLY NOT!
Bend me over in the bathroom.
See? I took your nigger dick so I'm totally not racist.
10 months later hatch a niglet.
Pic Related.