You are white SJWs. You are not distinct in fashion from nonwhite SJWs...

You are white SJWs. You are not distinct in fashion from nonwhite SJWs. You are not distinct in any fashion from woman SJWs. You are not distinct in any fashion from gay SJWs. You are not distinct in any fashion from trans SJWs. You are funded by the very same billionaires. Right down to the individual.

If I say:

"Fuck _____, they caused all our problems in the world. They run the world. The entire world is run by _____, and if we got rid of them everything would be better"

You can't tell who said that. If it was a BLM redditor talking about whites. Or a radical feminist talking about men. Or a radical LGBTQ gender theorist talking about "cisgenders". Or a Anon Babbleack nazi talking about jews.

Same if I go:

We as _____ are uniquely oppressed. Some other groups are oppressed too, but we as _____ face more oppression than other groups. And we as _____ are victims of conspiracies. The entire society in America is against _____."

Again, you can't tell if that's the BLMer talking about himself, the radical feminist talk about herself, the gender theorist talking about themself, or the nazi talking about himself.

Of I go:

"WE'RE not funded by billionaires! OTHER groups are funded by billionaires but not us! Because we are victims of oppression based on our _____"

Again, skin color, gender, straightness, gayness, transsexuality, you can't tell which is in there. Cuz none of you WHITE SJWs are ANY different from ANY of the other SJWs.

Come on white SJWs, tell me why you're any different. Come on woke rightists. Tell me why YOUR woke identity politics are better than other people's woke identity politics.

Lil white SJW land over here. Full of white SJW redditors doing the exact same thing nonwhite SJW redditors do

Are you actually here for a debate or are you going to be a faggot?

Look at everything I wrote in the OP. Look at how much work I put into that meme infograph. Look at what I said. Then look at your comment and the inevitable lame, manipulative, dismissive and goalpost moving replies of anons that will come. WHO is "here for debate" and who is "not"?

Not that there's much to debate since what I wrote is such blatantly and obviously factual

I am trying to judge whether you are worth bothering with. So far I'm leaning no.

You're right, the only real difference is that the rightwing SJWs are a tiny fringe group confined to places like Anon Babble and have no actual power, whereas lefting SJWs control the Democrat party, universities, public schools, Hollywood, etc.

all day spam thread

fuck off glowies, fucking faggot.
nobody cares if you are pay to be a shaboy retard.

Op has already decided he is right and no anon can have different views because we are all one person just filter his file names

Like I always say, totally empty, lame, meaningless answers from you people. Just emptiness and butthurt in your responses because IRL there IS nothing for you to say when confronted with cold hard facts of truth

I haven't even started to address anything yet. To begin, drop the attitude.

"Woke right" isn't a real term. Knock it off. No one will take you seriously if you use media-generated, system-approved fake language. You might as well start using 'Latinx' unironically.

This is the exact same thing reddit SJWs would say.

You're right, the only real difference is that the leftwing SJWs are a tiny fringe group confined to places like Anon Babbleshitredditsays and have no actual power, whereas rightwing SJWs control the republican party, universities, public schools, Hollywood, etc.

The only difference in fact is that America is a capitalist country which goes to war against countries who adopt leftwing politics. So actually YOU are the establishment IRL and not them. They're just puppets getting manipulated into helping you with racebait

Why can't any of you speak with anything remotely approaching concrete responses? Facts. Information. Rationale. Reason. Why is it WHENEVER you're confronted it's just this empty buttmad seethery?

If you are not going to engage in good faith then why do you think you deserve responses to you shit?

Empty. Just the emptiest, buttmadded seethery, like with every time I come here and confront you over these matters. When you have nothing more to say you always just pull out a handful of tricks to try and manipulate other people viewing the thread, and right now your chosen trick is to randomly play the victim with classic rightwinger manufactured victimhood.

Here I'll help. "I'm sorry I will stop being a faggot. I am here to learn more about you. Please tell me what you think on blah".

What premises are you even starting with? For example, do you think that categories like 'race' are fake and have no real-world meaning beyond social assignment? If so, you are too dumb/naive for the truth, and need basic education in topics like biology and statistics before we can even begin to 'debate' anything in a non-trivial manner.

Come on faggot were you raised by sheep or something?

Now this is another thing SJWnazis on Anon Babble do when they're tongue tied. They pretend they didn't understand your posts. Have fun with that SJWnazi since my posts, in particular the OP picture that I posted, are unbelievably meticulous.

When one of you will say something with actual substance to me, other than your usual empty whiteSJW kvetching, then I'll have something of substance to say in response. Until then what you are writing to me in your comments are empty whining.

In case you didn’t know, OP is that hilarious lulzcow Shabbos faggot James Lindsey here seething at Anon Babble because his gay faggot Shabbos psyops failed and boomerang’s pathetically in of the weakest gayest things ever seen on Anon Babble. I’d call OP a pathetic cunt of a man and a bottom of the barrel house nigger faggot. But all already know that.

Were you just never taught basic etiquette?

Empty kvetching. Empty kvetching. Empty kvetching.

Say the magic word faggot.

Just one of you tell me why the substance of my OP, including its picture, is wrong. And do so with substance of your own instead of just empty whining and utterly random non sequiturs such as .

see

He did the meme guys.

Just one of you tell me why the substance of my OP, including its picture, is wrong. And do so with substance of your own instead of just empty whining and utterly random non sequiturs such as .

PS Problem is my OP isn't wrong so not one of you can. You simply cannot.

White SJWs

Statistically white, female, college students from the mid 2010s are democrats. What you find on Anon Babble are low grade autists and schizos, nihilistic shitposters, and glowies trying to control the narrative.

Is there a name for this tactic besides bad jacketing? It's been done so many times for so many things over the years I feel like it deserves one.

Total Kike Death

Nobody cares, James. This guy sucks more jew dick than a Jewish mohel.

Remember at the end of last year how if you were against being replaced by Indians it was said you want DEI for Whites?

Unironically, this.

Homophobia is an obvious example, too. Can anyone else think of a similar example of this tactic where people try to gaslight that being against something means you are the thing?

No but if it doesn't have a name you could make one.

You came too late, the battle is over and you lost. Now, help me think up some more examples and a good name for your outdated tactic.

Anon Babbleack nazi talking about jews.

Not all Jews are bad, there are Conservative jews just as there are Liberal Christians that are just as detrimental to our cause.

We as _____ are uniquely oppressed. Some other groups are oppressed too, but we as _____ face more oppression than other groups. And we as _____ are victims of conspiracies. The entire society in America is against _____."

I will point you to the multiple pro-black DEI and Affirmative Action explicitly made to advance African Americans in American society- such programs DO NOT exist for Whites, period! There is no argument against this that does not evnture into the realm of hypotheticals.

"WE'RE not funded by billionaires! OTHER groups are funded by billionaires but not us! Because we are victims of oppression based on our _____"

Your little quip after this is not even related to the point- we WANT more money invested in our cause, we never have acted like we are a grass-roots movement (even though ironically, for the most part we are.)

Wolf in sheep’s clothing but I like bad jacketing.

Best I can think of is a yiddish suplex, but I want something that describes it better.

If you are antisemite they say well maybe you are a jew then. Um no.

Transposition perhaps?

I wish we were funded by Billionaires we would take over in an instant.

Rubber think where everything bounces off at the projector as a defense?

I’m rubber you’re glue. Everything you say bounces off me and sticks to you. Literal grade school retardation from these clowns.

They are 14 in the head.

Bad jacketing is already established but it just means creating a bunch of speculation and rumors about someone in order to discredit, it feels a little off. In these examples it's been a direct reverse. Hate fags, you're gay. Call to action, you're a fed. Oppose woke with hostility, you're woke.

I like it

Call it something like the Magic Rubber Defense to denote how retarded it is.

"woke" is steeped in cultural marxism. the right wing by definition is not marxist. there is no such thing as a "woke right"