Why is the Bible so redpilled on women ?

and the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man. And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man

Men are gods perfect human, men are thoughtful, romantic, sensitive, emotional, dreamful of eternal love and ready to truly love a worthy woman, men walk the earth with their heads held high and eternally seeking true human contact and companionship
women are everything opposite of above, women walk the earth looking at the ground, having no emotional depth or investment in their surroundings, women are just bad copies, bad first attempt at human
how the duck did Bible get a true read on women way back then and modern man still cant and hopelessly simps for these imperfect beasts ?

The "standing behind a lectern and speaking to people who can't read or write" profession is arguably the first profession to come into existence and the Bible is only two thousand years old which seems impossibly ancient, however, the library at Alexandria was from 18 thousand years ago.

For 16 thousand years before the bible was assembled, these lectern pounding shamen were writing their thoughts with scroll, ink and quill, and they had nothing else to do except write, think, and reason, and they figured it all out, for all time inside those sixteen thousand years.

The hair-brained stories in the Bible are actually not two thousand years old, the story of the great flood, is arguably one of the oldest stories we have. It's closer to 40 thousand years old, back before writing and fire.

God got so mad, probably due our sins, that he made the ocean rise up and flushed everyone into the Persian gulf except for that one guy who for whatever reason had a big boat and rescued those around him, and was able to survive to talk about it.

Chat is this real???

If you think about it, even without Eve condemning mankind to darkness, the nature of women was revealed when Lot's daughters got him drunk twice to basically rape him.

Daughters?? What!!!!????

basically every religion is red pilled on women

arent men supposed to sacrifice for the woman? like if there is a car you step in front. you attack the intruder. you sleep next to the door. why are you butthurt aboutt his?

the bible sucks

I love women despite how imperfect they are, the feeling of their soft skin, their smell, the beauty. Not much beats loving a woman AND her loving you back. When she looks you in the eyes as she sucks your dick you know she worships you and can’t resist you. I can never genuinely hate women, life would lose most of its meaning without women

Idk man I just feel like Love conquers All

The legion story was literally just a borderline whore who went insane after taking 1000 cocks and hitting the wall.

she was taken out of Man

Whoever wrote that got it backwards. Female came first, and then male came second, after females realized that mating with yourself is not the fastest way to evolve. """proto-She""" figured out that spraying her immune system at the enemy and having it dissolve and the goo comes back bearing broken gifts of enemy, is a good way to keep calories coming into your craw, and so this entire franchise of the mother of mothers spraying chunky immune system at the enemy, and rewarding the chunks that come back bearing gifts with repetitive production on DNA chain replication operations for sub-cellular repairs, is where the first "male swimmer" came into existance and why all procreation involves "little swimmers". Back at your origin of males, all males were little swimmers bringing payloads of DNA to the enemy to break them apart and de-nature enemy so I can eat.

Which means the male came out of the woman. Your two jobs to justify your existence is enemywrecking, resource gathering, and slam dunking that into her mouth area, and then putting your DNA into the vagfactory factory.

I don't like these stories there is no need for them

thoughtful, romantic, sensitive, emotional, dreamful of eternal love

why do men lie to themselves all the damn time KEK
male romance

"babe, i would heckin DIE for you, okay? so i can't help you with the dishes, because in my head fantasies i give my life to save you or something"

God really looked at Adam and thought, "Aww, he's lonely. I better make him a friend!" Meanwhile Adam is really wishing he hadn't.

N makes no sense
U. Gotta place a bitch

like if there is a car you step in front

yes, a man will surely stop the momentum of a car if he jumps in front of her
the reasoning behind a man walking closer to traffic is probably because a man has better spatial awareness, twitch reflexes, hand eye coordination, etc and can potentially protect he and his partner from the path of the vehicle

David's mother was born in England and was Anglican. She was of Russian-Jewish descent on her father's side, and English Anglican on her mother's side.

jew face.png - 209x229, 53.01K

Religion is at least two and in some ways 8 thousand years older than the discovery of how life evolved on the Earth.

These ideas about God from the stone age, are devices that are only useful for historical reconstruction of what we were in that transition time between monkeys and what you see now.

If one of you shitheads fix the telomere mismatch on chromosome #2 and #13, making it possible for all monkeys and humans to breed again, I will be unhappy as the Jews force everyone to treat monkeys as human, just because they can breed with you now that an AI-fluid enables that by aligning that which was misaligned in the comon ancestor to monkeys and humans, some 750 million years ago.

Based Aussie niggas relentless abbo on death watch

Raised without religion, in 1986 Suchet underwent a religious conversion after having read Romans 8 in his hotel room. Soon afterwards, he was baptised into the Church of England. Suchet stated in an interview with Strand Magazine, "I'm a Christian by faith. I like to think it sees me through a great deal of my life.

He's the only jew worthy of not being holocausted. But of course not being allowed to spread his genes, not that it matters anyway with his age. I'm glad to say I respect him

Church tradition holds that the first five books were all written by Moses, who was unique among the prophets in that God showed him visions of what came before him (instead of the future) to enable him to write Genesis. This does, however, mean that Moses described things from his own cultural frame of reference, so even things he saw were described in a certain way. For example, Sodom has been uncovered by archaeologists and confirmed to have been destroyed by a Tunguska-like meteor airburst - Moses, having no clue about space or asteroids and probably barely even knowing the earth is round, described this as "fire from heaven", divine force was the only way he knew.

If you think about it, the creation narrative lines up squarely with the stoned ape hypothesis. The sequence of events is as follows:

1) Humans arise in East Africa, where the climate is perfect and everything is edible. I call to mind the pasta describing Africa as the Garden of Eden.

God creates humans, male and female, and places them in a garden - this statement is actually written before Adam and Eve are personally named

2) These humans live lives which are nasty, brutish, and short a la chimpanzees where only alpha males get all the bitches
3) Man eats something that causes him to have visions and discover God. He realizes that he doesn't have to live this way. Probably shares some with his beta male friends.

Eve eats the fruit, and then Adam. They develop all kinds of knowledge they weren't ready for.

4) This new tribe of men, with their newfound knowledge, drag some women by force down the Nile valley across the Sahara knowing not what lay on the other side of it. Maybe took a couple generations to get there.

Expulsion from the garden - civilization comes at a price

5) Civilization founded on the one man one woman principle.

Adam and Eve potentially real people, but also archetypes of these first civilized men and their stupid wives who forced them to do this.

have you not read the bible?
my ex effectively did something like this to me
I sure do miss her

Suchet's father was of Lithuanian-Jewish descent, the son of Izidor Suchedowitz,[8] originally from Kretinga in the Pale of Settlement of the Russian Empire.

Love the Bible bro
The best Bible is kill serb

women say they'd let the reaper take their husband and live on

men say they'd willingly go with the reaper and let their wife live on

Ok, so in other words, men and women are in total agreement on this one.

Men have the capacity to be closer to God. When Satan chose whom to approach to convince them to rebel against God and eternal paradise he picked the woman.

Man's soul yearns for more and greater, the female soul is quite pleased with self destruction for its own sake.

why is the Bible so redpilled on women?

Civilizational collapses have happened many times before. Runaway sexual competition is almost always one of the biggest contributors, because sex in the only human need where you directly benefit from other peoples' misfortune. Imagine that I'm starving and you have more food than you need, I don't magically become better off if locusts destroy all your food. You becoming worse off didn't magically make me better off because hunger isn't comparing me to you. Now imagine I'm ugly and you're hot (ibn4 >imagine). I DO become better off if you are disfigured in an acid attack, or if you become homeless, or if you develop a chronic illness or whatever. You becoming worse off magically makes me better of because women are comparing me to you, and thus all that matters is the gap between us, not where we stand in the absolute. It's the inherently comparative nature of sexual attractiveness that causes people in sexually liberal societies to become so selfish and sociopathic.

while there is validity to your analogy, if you have food and your opponent has food and his food is destroyed, the value of the remaining food (yours) is increased in a marketplace

both men and women agree on who should die

this is somehow a bad thing

if you have food and your opponent has food and his food is destroyed, the value of the remaining food (yours) is increased in a marketplace

Absolutely, but if food was your only need and you already have enough food then you wouldn't care about participating in the market because you would already have everything that you need.

The only reason you would care about trading food in the market is if you have other needs that aren't being met. Maybe water, shelter, sex etc. You then trade food for these things until you have enough of everything. What makes sex special is that when it comes to attractiveness you can never have enough unless someone else doesn't have enough. To get the girl you need to be more attractive than me, which means I need to be not attractive enough. Sex (or rather the attractiveness, status etc needed to get it) is the one thing in the economy that is a zero-sum game. The "crabs in a bucket" mentality is the optimal strategy in zero-sum games, which is precisely why this mindset started proliferating as sexual taboos were lifted.

In a society that can produce more food, water, shelter etc than what's required to satisfy everyone's needs, the only reason to keep seeking economic advantage is sex. Sex is what keeps the economic grind going forever in societies that should otherwise be "post scarcity". Without sex the grind would end once a society finds a way to produce enough for everyone. Any society that has the means to produce enough for everyone but where some people still go without is like this because of sexual competition. This is why social conservatism evolved historically, and it's why the left are so useless at creating alternatives to "capitalism" today.

It was a porno fantasy written by a yid

women werent made from the rib of man, stop perpetuating that bad translation.

That rape fantasy establishes two ancient bloodlines.

I want to agree with you on this, but theres a whole term of "keeping up with the joneses"

Even with sex in this nuclear family coined term, man still wants to be better than his neighbor. Sex is a motivator, but ultimately I think pride is an even bigger motivator. A man rather have a statue or a football stadium named after him than a harem if you really think about it.

So what's the problem with that webm, they all agree

Sodom has been uncovered by archaeologists

After hearing GOD's punishments for the Fall; Adam renamed the woman "EVE" - because she would be the mother of all living. And Eve as part of Evening also makes sense.

She was literally Adam's property. You name what you own right?

even without Eve condemning mankind to darkness

GOD blamed Adam because Adam knew it was wrong, but did it anyway.

Try Judah who ends up sleeping with his own daughter in law and doesn't know it.

Or Jacob who had his wedding night with the wrong sister and didn't know until morning.

I'd never trust anyone who wasn't a christian even if they were white.

And Eve as part of Evening also makes sense.

Moses had all the pre-flood records and books -> passed down from Noah.

Everyone was redpilled on women bavk then.

Try that one guy who was surrounded by people from the tribe of Benjamin that wanted to rape him, so he threw his wife in front of the house and didn't let her in, so the attackers would rape her instead. By the next day she was dead and he sent her remains to all the tribes to start one of the most brutal wars of Israel.

Book of judges chapters 19-21. This was to show how lawless Israel was at that time without a king

Notice the devil focuses on Eve the woman and not Adam the man. Then SHE focuses on Adam...