Why is this white man always trying to play God?
Can somebody tell me that?
Why is this white man always trying to play God?
Can somebody tell me that?
Because it's based.
Because the white man was created in god's image and we take after our creators.
Why are you a faggot?
GMOs are fake.
God can simply stop us but does not
so either there is no God or he does not care
so you can get your sexchange - show some damn appreciation
DIREWOLF IS BASED
SPIDER ISNT BASED
so either there is no God or he does not care
there is no God
I hope there is no god
Big difference there chief. Good luck
Both cringe, still no foxgirl gf with big fluffy tail.
God can simply stop us but does not
so either there is no God or he does not care
We might be close to a reset so they can try again. They aren't bound by our spacetime so they don't have to wait 15 billion years.
would be cool for clothing. we already have one bug enslaved that cant survive without us anymore making silk for us
We're living in a sin simulator. Lucifer challenged God that people with free will would choose to turn away from Him. God created this place for us, to let the truth unfold. Lucifer and the fallen angels are allowed to torment and misguide us, so that we can be tested. Its Gods beautiful reality, filled with unholy sinners and unholy obstacles from Satan.
Physicists have been at a roadblock for decades wasting taxpayer money faced with evidence that Einstein's theories about the fabric of time and space aren't quite right. Look up The Crisis in Cosmology or wave-particle duality.
Idk, man. Spider seems pretty based to me.
Lucifer challenged God
Uh huh. Why didn't god just punch him in the throat.
We're not even the only animals that do this. There are ants that have domesticated aphids. And mitochondria are essentially cellular domestication.
Lucifer challenged God
*exactly like the being with both omnipotence and omniscience that created LITERALLY EVERYTHING created hi to do
God is never surprised, and is also infallible, and somehow also benevolent
one of those things has to be untrue, logically you can not have omnipotence and omniscience in a creator of all that is also benevolent
one step closer to biomachines
You will see man made horrors beyond your comprehension
Using the tools that God gave us to shape the world that God gave us dominion over is not playing God. Experimenting and taking leaps of faith is why we have modern 1st world countries, modern medicine, glasses for people who have shit eyesight, pet dogs and cats, etc. If you want to live around people who never push the limits of their capabilities, go live in Africa.
logically you can not have omnipotence and omniscience in a creator of all that is also benevolent
meant "and still have free will" there, but that also works
because we are God, and you're a cursed child of satan
will see
We had a nigger president
Hey bro, just a heads up but you got schizophrenia.
The fruit falls not far from the tree.
What makes you think God can put a stop to it? This is a false dichotomy.
Fun fact
You're not white if you are afraid of spiders. Only sweaty brownoid jungleoids have to worry about venomous spiders.
There is no God!
if there is God then show me miracle!!!
My brother in Christ. You are asking to see a magician, a showman. You ask for hocus-pocus card tricks and fireballs.
Bite me, spider. I was french a slut with rock hard nipples while I hang upside down in the rain. >: (
God gave us the capacity to change His world, and gave us free will, perhaps just to see what we would do. Who knows? Only God. Don't try to act like you know what God wants or doesn't want.
bug enslaved that cant survive without us anymore making silk for us
It would make more sense to GMO silkworms to produce unique "naturally dyed" silk
if he can't, then he is not omnipotent, and also you're outside of abrahamism then, because for abrahamism he must have omnipotence, and omniscience
fair trade off when the consequence for not believing based on LITERALLY FUCKING NOTHING BUT AN ANCIENT HUMAN AUTHORED BOOK is "eternal torture"
he's not saying "believe in me or not idc" he's saying
believe in me OR ELSE"
If you presume to know the complete nature of God and/or reality, I simply don't believe you. You exist for His amusement and pleasure, as do the concepts of tension and disorder. The material realm is the garbage pit for outcasts and mortal test-takers.
And Australians.
you're outside of abrahamism then
So what? This is not a church with strict doctrines to follow. This is a philosophical discussion of ideas about God, being held on a Mongolian basket-weaving forum.
Remember that chink that got arrested for manipulating the DNA of two human children
Look up Russel’s paradox. You’re playing word games. God is all powerful in the meaningful sense. Obviously he can’t do all things that can “be stated”. He can do all things that can be done, however. He can’t impose on our free will AND give us free will, because that is a logical contradiction. You are playing word games.
If God didn't want us to do this, why would he grant such digits? Besides, us doing this is probably adorable to Him, like when kids go into grandmas pantry and use random ingredients to make potions.
Yet we aren't allowed to edit for IQ, delete all traces of niggers from the genome
that's pretty sick.
First bit of modern fuckery that actually sounds cool.
We are going to flood the world with red spiders
They are criminals
If you presume to know the complete nature of God and/or reality, I simply don't believe you.
I presume nothing but the abrahamic god being the source of evil according to its own rules and logic
no interest in that discussion
You’re playing word games.
literally 100% of the evidence for its existence is words
and?
I want a vest made of pure red spider silk.
whitey always feels the need to enslave all living things around him as he is the devil incarnate. See how he warps nature to his twisted will, like Saruman in their so-called Lord of the Rings. A cautionary tale of their true nature to be sure.
I only want to talk about this if I can feel like I'm winning a debate club!
uh, okay. have fun.
no, I only want to discuss abrahamism and how it's pure bullshit right now, deeper discussions about whatever reality and god actually are, not the moment for it
faggots who claim genetic engineering is an affront to nature or whatever some hippie shit that is say positively nothing when they reap the rewards of centuries of genetic manipulation such as through imbreeding, radiation blasting, and hybridization. You faggots have it way too fucking easy to be complaining about this.
According to the Bible, man was granted dominion over all the beasts. I don't see why that wouldn't apply here.
Christ is the pathway to everlasting life. Christ is the source of truth. Judaic scholars claim Yeshua was a false prophet because Jesus' miracles and message threatened their power.
That's enough for me to know there's two sides competing, and I've sworn my allegiance to Jesus.
God can test me or put a red fluorescent spider on me or do whatever he wants to me as long as theirs a pathway for me to ascend to a higher existence.
I only want to discuss this subject through the lens of Abrahamism, which I consider to be pure bullshit, that way I can feel smug instead of thinking about the nature of my existence
Faustian Spirit
You wouldn't get it
Dunno about radiation blasting but combining two kinds of citrus fruits is not the same as putting e. coli DNA in corn you fucking kike
Because whites are closest thing to me unlike niggers.
that way I can feel smug instead of thinking about the nature of my existence
it's blackpilling no matter which way you approach it, smug beats the hell out of depressed
Christ is the source of truth.
source for this claim?
They have been playing God for a long time now.
Urgh gross
Get the brake cleaner
Dunno about radiation blasting but combining two kinds of citrus fruits is not the same as putting e. coli DNA in corn you fucking kike
we have been blasting radiation onto crops to induce mutations for over a century since the 1920s.
and so fucking what shit for brains? As if the same thing couldn't be reproduced using sheer volume and randomization to acquire the same effect. What exactly is wrong with that? You know, you faggots never specify why you just huddle like cavemen not understanding just saying new thing bad hrumpf.
genetically modified glow in the dark spidie niggers
The Dire Wolf was a con, this is the real deal!
Boh je slovaak
also, hybridization induces a fuck ton of mutations. Its an easy way to experiment and get new stuff. You're hitting the genetic slot machine. Making plants imbred also has a similar effect. You're just comp
More like German/Russian but living in Slovakia.
just figure out how to edit dna
run around like a chicken with its head cut off editing any and everything we can think of
almost all of these uses are purely motivated by shekelgrubbery
why are we like this
Personally I think gene-editing is lazy compared to the great lengths people go to, to create new hybrids/varieties. This is my main objection which isn't a matter of morality but principle.
you wont understand.
True respectable work is mastering such new mutations.
bro what if we made spider goats that produced flourescent silk
"but why though"
cope communist
Erm wait...a genetically modified spider?
Are you thinking what I'm thinking?
Yep...f*cking epic!
It's just a belief. I operate with an understanding that I'll be rewarded for putting my faith in something I can't fully prove. That's the whole point of what I'm trying to say. We're living in a sin simulator that tests our faith, giving us more reasons to doubt than to believe. That's why the saying goes: "it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven"
But it might as well mean something like: If you only believe in the material world, your afterlife is in question
The bottomless pit that revelations speaks of where untold horrors come out and slaughter billions?
That pit is "genetic research"
The Bible
HP Lovecraft and Steven King tried to warn you but you wouldn't listen
Manmade horrors beyond our comprehension SOON
We're living in a sin simulator that tests our faith, giving us more reasons to doubt than to believe.
why does it seem like God is only interested in surrounding himself with unquestioning sycophants
i am so fucking tired of these faggots who basically are the equiv of some schmuck rolling up to a mechanic's shop and complaining about the usage of power tools. I keep these annoying faggots well fed indirectly.
In a world of sin, where men seek to control others by any means, we cannot turn to ancient books or the doctrines of exalted individuals. All that matters are your actions in the situation you find yourself in. Enslaving oneself to the flesh closes Satan's behavioural circuit, manifesting his victory. The spark of God, the conscious mind that may abend the devil's doctrine, is your key. To suffer nobly is to eventually die in non-life, to be born into eternal glory in His kingdom.
Steven King
nigger his stories are mystery boxes and he fucks up hard 90% of the time when he tries to open them
t. read like half his books
That's not really a question I ask myself. God is the chief architect of the simulation. I'd gladly enjoy serving the ultimate programmer. Call it an instinct. I think we would get along well.
if you're just knowingly choosing to believe things based on books there's way better ones
That's not really a question I ask myself.
also, heh
Not interested in your hogwash. Jesus had no interest in profiting off his message or his miracles. Why would I put my faith in jeopardy for some written-for-profit book?
I'm loyal.
The best-selling book of all time is the Bible, with an estimated 5 billion copies sold and distributed. Other notable best-sellers include the Quran and "A Tale of Two Cities" by Charles Dickens, which has sold over 200 million copies.
Jesus had no part in writing the bible at all
Brainlet atheist tier logic
According to 1 Timothy he did.
“All scripture is God breathed”
Just don't wear the clothes made out of it. Useless research.
I see you're using ad hominem already. I'm talking about the teacher, not the students, and you know it. Jackass.
Because white man is superior.
Go have long covid and be bisexual somewhere else faggot.
EW A HOMO
The letter, traditionally attributed to the Apostle (((Saul of Damascus))), a jew who never met Jesus, had a "vision", and wrote half the new testament
I see you have no clue what ad hominem even means; it's an attack on you completely unrelated to the subject, newfren
Why is this white man always trying to play God?
White man does not play God
God plays White man
What makes you think God can put a stop to it?
Why wouldn't he be able to?
I guess it's better than "this one loaf of bread fed 1000 people for years" logic
logical fallacy whatever suits you. you're not even arguing content anymore you're arguing semantics. God bless you, friend.
1/3 of the New Testament, and the rest of that statement is accurate
why are christians so anti-semantic?
Call me a Luddite but I prefer a bit of the old selective breeding myself... Just do!
Europeans have never really been known for their humility.
14 out of 27 or so isn't 1/3rd
If going by book number, sure. Word count is closer to 1/3 because John and Luke wrote some larger books (johanine epistles aside)
fair enough
let's go back to the part where he's more or less the Joseph Smith of his time
Peter said Paul was reliable, that’s the Christian position
Smith's friends said they saw the plates too
Ok but when will scientists do the actually important thing?
Ok? So according to smiths friend he’s a reliable source.
According to the apostles Paul is a reliable source.
That means you need to assess the accuracy of the original claims, Smith in Mormonism and the Apostles in Christianity
you need to assess the accuracy of the original claims
ok so one happened like 200 years ago, and the other 2,000 years ago, logically the more recent one would be more accurate, naturally
And that's fine. Quite frankly both is ideal, bank useful genes for future use and find new ones.
GYATT
Not necessarily. Both claim events 2000 years ago, Smith’s just take place in North America. If I claimed that Emperor Tiberius was a woman, it wouldn’t be more likely that tacitus’ writings about him, just because I claimed it more recently. We need to investigate all historical claims thoroughly and critically. I’m not gonna declare one right and the other wrong, we just need to research and arrive at a conclusion
Both claim events 2000 years ago, Smith’s just take place in North America.
not entirely true, the Smith event with the plates was not 2k years ago; Saul's vision of Yeshua was
no those are jews
picrel
this would play into simulation theory. actually its one of the better guesses as to why we would be in a simulation. matrix too. who really knows but lots of evidence proves that we are living in a giant simulation.
Smith found the plate 200 years ago, but the plates claim events that happened 2000 years ago. The claim on the plates is more important than the plates themselves
the plates claim events that happened 2000 years ago.
Yeshua claimed events that happened thousands of years before he lived too, and those and all of his story was written down secondhand years after he was dead
the old testament/torah stuff all of it is claimed on circulated for thousands of years WORD OF MOUTH before it was ever written down
got goosebumps as i was reading this post
the torah wastes so much time on these extensive lineages because they were word of mouth histories that otherwise would have been entirely lost
you can tell how many generations roughly it was before it was written by those lineages
Jesus mostly claimed stuff that was already in the TaNaKh
We have literally no idea when the Torah/Pentarch was written, because Israel is wetter than eygpt. Early estimates put it at around 1250 BC, the latest possible would be around 400BC. But to assert that it was definitely oral tradition beforehand is by no means certain.
I’m not arguing that the Bible is reliable, and I’m not arguing that Joseph smith is unreliable. But ancient history, especially of wetter costal regions like Israel, is very hard to make definitive statements on
to assert that it was definitely oral tradition beforehand is by no means certain.
nothing is certain, however >you can tell how many generations roughly it was before it was written by those lineages
most of those people named have nothing to do with nothing, they're just named so their memory wasn't lost entirely
I'm almost positive at some point someone added made up names to it just for shits and giggles, because that's how we are
memeflaggot
Traditional theology holds that lineages are to show decent of Christ from David, and to show God selecting the Israelite nation from Abrahams seed. The last lineage being Matthew 1, opening the New Testament. Also the lineage in genesis 5 is a messianic prophesy. Also given that the chronological progression of lineages rather than a random distribution we’d expect if it was just recording gaps between development of the story and its writing down, your theory seems unlikely.
utah
land of the ute-azteca
who migrated south and called themselves aztecs
bottom text
Because it means potential immense improvements to mankind.
Not exactly a difficult concept.
given that the chronological progression of lineages rather than a random distribution we’d expect if it was just recording gaps between development of the story and its writing down, your theory seems unlikely.
this book has had more semitic hands in and on it than the Desmond is amazing kid, it's been edited as many times as wikipedia
lineages are to show decent of Christ from David
the jews weren't even monotheistic in David's time, Yahweh was the head of a pantheon
the point of stating that is to further lean on the unreliability of the texts
how the fuck does flourescent red silk benefit anyone but silk merchants and fashion fags
I cope with reality being shit by saying god loves us, but let's us get raped as a test of that love
Christkikes are the best golems.
Both of those points are possible, but without historical evidence. All we have are the claims of the TaNaKh, and Dead Sea scrolls. We can be confident that the TaNaKh was almost perfectly preserved from 200BC onwards, outside of that we don’t know.
The El pantheon theory comes from uncharitable readings of the Torah, but is pretty shaky from an historical viewpoint, especially as it’s congruent with the expulsion the canaanites
Goat fucking jews wrote about it in the desert 2000 years ago. They didn't even provide pics.
thing that weaves laser grids in dark rooms isnt based
So no counter argument then? I accept your concession
pretty shaky from an historical viewpoint
By the end of the Babylonian captivity, Yahwism began turning away from polytheism — or, by some accounts, Yahweh-centric monolatry — and transitioned towards monotheism, and Yahweh was proclaimed the creator deity and the sole deity to be worthy of worship.
monotheism is their cope for why he allowed Jerusalem to be destroyed
Yeshua's link to the Davidic line is extremely shaky since it was arguably ended with the fall of Jerusalem
Source: jews
No thanks you can keep it
I can kind of see it if you're in the desert and the global human population is less than 500 million and you have some incredibly strong drugs
This is the most likely theory for people to hold to a later date of TaNaKh authorship. But all of these gods are described as imports from the Canaanite pantheon in the Histories, which would fit with archeological finds. Ultimately it comes down to whether you think books like Jeremiah are accurate, both theories explain why we find idols, half of TaNaKh is about this.
Niggers must love that spider.
how does learning gene editing benefit mankind
Rome wasn't built in a day. Gene editing spiders today for red silk, gene editing rabbits tomorrow to live longer, gene editing humans to live longer with rabbit ears the day after.
Because they are closer to God than you, so it seems like they play God when they use God's creation to create something new themselves.
Whites are the actual "chosen people" of God.
while jews are the chosen people of the devil
so anything the white man makes is good and is part of God's plan.
Aren't black people more likely to be God's chosen? Whites repeatedly leave the faith en masse while blacks are unceasingly faithful.
if the reasoning isn't shekelgrubbing, it's muh dick
the older I get the more I hope we never make it out of this star system, anything else that may exist out there is way better off
Read the story, always thought there was something objectively fucked up about her. Apparently she remained close to her father.
Because we ARE gods.
I'm a smart Christian
kek
Yet you don't refute it or even try, lmao.
Now make pic related reality dammit
Cool, can they gene edit niggers so they're not complete fucking assholes?
kikes
white man
pick one imbecile nigger faggot
Don't ask us fag. We don't know either. Nobody should mess with this shit. Also neck yourself.
Look up Norman Borlaug you stupid fag.
Whatever occurred, whatever occurs, we do not have to apologize, we step over what exists.
youtube.com
Isn't it natural for our children to become superior to us? Isn't that the goal of life? I think this was a metaphor for that ancient knowledge that you need to watch your offspring carefully.
Man should not gene edit the spiders this will only end in horror.
I mean you're free to gloss over that whole "live longer" part. You seem like the type of person that wouldn't be satisfied with any answer so I'm just going to stop while I'm ahead.
How I think of it is like this; we are simply children playing on God's sandbox. We aren't creating anything, we're simply modifying what's already there. Basically making sandcastles in God's sandbox.
You seem like the type of person that wouldn't be satisfied with any answer
only the bullshit logic ones displease me
shit like "living longer" is the carrot at the end of the stick that enables shit like monsanto's "copyrighted seeds"
see my vest see my vest
made of real masticated insect flesh!
We were created in the image of God
The image of God is the creator
Then to embrace our divine inheritance, we too must create
there's so many obstacles to "living longer" in the way people think it's probably never going to happen in any kind of conditions you would want
anyone who's spoken to enough of the VERY elderly would understand; life past 60 is just increasing misery for the vast majority
what good is an extra 50-100 years if you can barely move without breaking a bone
Christcucks are inhibiting anything useful like stem cells, all the dead babies must go to waste
dislike christcuckery but "abortion clinic to stem cell factory lab" has so many red flags on and around it
look at how they be with circumcision already, and stem cells would be exponentially more profitable than foreskin cells
Good luck selectively breeding goats until they make spider silk.
Are you thinking what I'm thinking?
maybe
maybe having goats make spider silk is just one of those things like trying to make a man a woman; aka "impossible and unnatural so it's abominable to even try"?
breeding goats
he's doing that already I suspect, all pakis do
What if I don't want to!
Why is this white man always trying to play God?
Are you implying science can replicate something God can do? So much for an all-powerful God lol.
pretty sure man has been able to impregnate a 14 year old then take off to leave some other guy to raise "my wife's son" for a long time now
before science, even
Like what? Its not like they need to poach babies, you have a surplus of abortions
They did do it. Also you could do some bacterial horizontal gene transfer shit au naturale but it would take forever
fag flag
talking about playing God
I'm confused
Can I be a g-d too??
*Tips Fedora*.
Right, let's do the Christian thing and interpret whatever we want into a small segment of the bible that fits our wishes and kill everyone who disagrees. That more like it?
Making a new living being using an altered genome is very different from trying to reshape an existing living being. While you could definitely, in theory, make some abominable things via generic engineering, useful creatures could be created using it as well. The spider goat was an example of something radical, yet real.
it's not like they NEED to make a new smartphone model every other year and push updates to the existing ones that purposely make them obsolete
you know how we is
bacterial horizontal gene transfer shit
don't think you can make a man a womerns that way
I'm not an atheist
spider-goat isn't an abominable thing because it's profitable, goy
what use would being able to produce silk be for a goat
ignore us entirely
you hear a baaa-ing somewhere above you
it's a goat in its web ready to pounce
how do i shot web literaly
Spiders are based.
spiders with butt lasers
be not afraid
what use would being able to produce silk be for a goat
Spider silk has tensile strength comparable to that of steel. But gathering it from the tiny spiders that make it is extremely costly. Also, you are thinking very narrowly. This doesn't have to be goats or spider silk.
Fluorescence isn't that cool, it's nothing like lasers.
Both cringe, carrier pigeons will be based
not one use for the goat itself can be conceived
I knew this already
you are thinking very narrowly. This doesn't have to be goats or spider silk.
it shows the mentality with which we approach things
thus far every use of this shit I can think of has been for shekelgrubbing and that part of our nature NEVER leads anywhere good
*have to amend this because I just remembered the chink that gene edited the babies to have HIV resistance/immunity and just YEETed them out into the world with pseudonyms, that was a chaotic use
still arguably dumb, we shouldn't be seeing uses of this shit out in the world in our or our kid's lifetimes, simply because evolution works on longer time scales and there's no fucking telling what all with happen when you start making crayon edits of the source code of life and that starts mixing uncontrollably with nature
but there's shekels to be made NOW for "ME" goyim, so YOLO
>not one use for the goat itself can be conceived
I have not said that. Spider silk can be used in medicine since its both durable and biocompatible, and also just for more durable clothes. Nice job pilpulling my statements.
What does evolution have to do with this? The whole point of genetic engineering is bypassing evolution. Instead nudging it to produce specific changes, you directly edit the source code.
GENEMOD EVERYTHING
I have not said that.
...so what use does it have, FOR THE GOAT ITSELF, no humans involved
What does evolution have to do with this?
everything, since you can not control it and how it might incorporate and EVOLVE the genetic engineering itself
for example, we've already been engineering viruses to have elements from other viruses that affect different species entirely
there is greater than a 0% chance that winds up somehow becoming viruses gaining the ability to start jumping species willy-nilly, via evolution muttifying things
we thought we knew what radium was too, started sticking the pretty glow in the dark shit on everything; then found out there was some invisible shit called RADIATION we couldn't immediately perceive the negative effects of on us, and found out what a bad fucking idea that was
there is no way to undo this once it's out there
monsanto crops ALREADY UNCONTROLLABLY CROSS BREED
why SHOULDN'T we just start giving animals the genes of other creatures that aren't even their same type of animal at all, to no benefit to the animal itself whatsoever, purely for profit centric purposes?
this is objectively evil
niggers are bioweapons of jews
they would all be extinct now if the jews didn't use them as bioweapons to destroy white people
it doesn't matter who they pray to, they are instruments of the devil
Lucifer, himself, and all his works, are instruments of God, without whom Satan would not even exist
It's just a belief. I operate with an understanding that I'll be rewarded for putting my faith in something I can't fully prove.
If that is true then why this specific belief in christianity and not any other religion or story?
...so what use does it have, FOR THE GOAT ITSELF, no humans involved
Oh, this is what you meant. None. The goat just has spider silk protein in its milk, which can be spun into fibers. I'm actually curious how this would affect the goats' ability to breastfeed their offspring.
everything, since you can not control it and how it might incorporate and EVOLVE the genetic engineering itself
That's a dumb argument. If it works, then the change has already been incorporated. As for how it "evolves" (mutates), that's a complete non-factor. The altered gene is a gene like any other, and any gene can mutate with various results. But thankfully, DNA is pretty good not fucking up when replicating itself. And even when a copy is wrong, there are mechanisms for fixing/removing it.
we thought we knew what radium was too
It's clear to me that you are projecting your ignorance of the matter onto the whole of humanity. If we thought like this about everything, nothing would ever get done. I'd rather humanity take risks, and we thankfully do.
monsanto crops ALREADY UNCONTROLLABLY CROSS BREED
I hate Monsanto, btw, for patenting their GM plants. Absolute kikery.
What is a "type" of animal?
to no benefit to the animal itself whatsoever
Anon, we've been killing animals for food and resources for as long as we've existed. As long as the genetic changes aren't making the animal suffer (see: pugs), I'm fine with it. Unless you are vegan, you can't use this argument without being a hypocrite.
Or he is weirdly autistic in how he does things.
You have the chip on your shoulder. You can make the best of it if you want. You think you're entitled to an easy-going life? You little clown
None.
I knew this already
I'm actually curious how this would affect the goats' ability to breastfeed their offspring.
honestly don't see them being able to at all, these things would only exist as organic machines, effectively
that's a complete non-factor.
again, thought we understood radium and a bunch of other shit like giving children heroin for a cough
you are projecting your ignorance of the matter onto the whole of humanity.
nigger what can one go off of if not history
>it's not like they NEED to make a new smartphone model every other year and push updates to the existing ones that purposely make them obsolete
both of the above and other historical mistakes
FUCKING FOR-PROFIT MEDICAL EXPERIMENTATION ON CHILDREN PUBERTY BLOCKING THEM
when we shekelgrub we lose all of our better instincts and natures 99% fucking percent of the time inarguably, you can have all the fucking "hope" we're not gonna humerns with it like we normally do but that's not doing shit to the odds
I hate Monsanto, btw, for patenting their GM plants. Absolute kikery.
the only reason it's "bad" is because kikery
almost as funny as you being willingly blind to how it's kikery in the goat use
that's fucking hylarious frendo
What is a "type" of animal?
you may be unaware of this but spiders are not mammals, and goats are not insects
As long as the genetic changes aren't making the animal suffer (see: pugs)
hilarious that you bring that up since that one didn't come out of the blue, that was many many smaller changes over dozens of generations to end up there
AKA "we didn't see what we were creating when we started making it"
Why must you assume it was a white man, it could've been a fluorescent man.
you may be unaware of this but spiders are not mammals, and goats are not insects
This literally doesn't matter for genetic engineering. At the base level, it's just protein production. The source animal is irrelevant.
hilarious that you bring that up since that one didn't come out of the blue, that was many many smaller changes over dozens of generations to end up there
What's hilarious about it?
AKA "we didn't see what we were creating when we started making it"
The selective breeders had an idea for a final result and spent a lot of time trying to achieve it. I have to assume that they got what they wanted.
these things would only exist as organic machines, effectively
As long as that existence isn't suffering, I'm fine with it. I'm very much a "humanity first" person.
when we shekelgrub we lose all of our better instincts and natures 99% fucking percent of the time inarguably, you can have all the fucking "hope" we're not gonna humerns with it like we normally do but that's not doing shit to the odds
I agree that giving puberty blockers to children is terrible, but that sentence is not coherent.
Or He's long-suffering, loving to not impede on our disgusting free will :(
This literally doesn't matter for genetic engineering.
*as far as we can see right now since we literally just fucking started editing it and immediately tossed it out into nature to fuck around and find out
this shit should have been super isolated for 100-200 years or so and carefully experimented on before being allowed out into nature, but YOLO
What's hilarious about it?
see above
The selective breeders had an idea for a final result and spent a lot of time trying to achieve it. I have to assume that they got what they wanted.
nobody saw a wolf or even other early dogs and saw pugs
As long as that existence isn't suffering, I'm fine with it.
would you know if it was
it can't tell you
that sentence is not coherent.
I literally just asked chatgpt if it was coherent to it or not, and this is what it suggested I use instead
"Whenever we 'shekelgrub'—whatever that means—we lose our better instincts and nature almost every single time, no question. You can cling to all the 'hope' you want that we won’t screw it up like we usually do, but that doesn’t change the odds one bit."
so this is a (You) problem, because it changed almost nothing
All of that is different from messing with the base level genetics. Imagine comparing medicine (not allopathic, but by means of plants and such) and glasses to shooting bioluminescent genes from a fish into a rat, and such. Lol.
I literally just asked chatgpt
forgot to mention it gave the longest pause before replying I've ever seen it give, it typically gives it in total in 1-2 seconds, this was like 20-30 seconds
if it's not x then it is certainly y
it's funny because I gave it no context for the subject being discussed, so it may have 'thought' AI was what was being discussed
red fluorescent silk
But why?
cope Kamala voter, you lost
Gay science
under all the wrong set of circumstances here you've effectively created something vaguely similar to some grey goo scenario where the genetics of literally everything that has DNA gets fucked
and people are seriously wondering why there should have been any kind of caution at all
but hey, shekels to grub, YOLO
Checked and divine pilled
505164915
Isn't a jew "doctor" who invented the first troonie operation? You're not white.
Red silk sneakers for niggers.
Magnus Hirschfeld
Bitch this be 100% spider silk Nikes you best not scuff em
the vast majority of shoe niggers would never even wear them
they're like s o yboys and "action figures" only vastly gayer since women collect shoes
I want to live longer to coom moar!
Sweat makes them melt instantly so don’t stress just chill please
Lol
source code of life
came from nothing (rocks, water and dirt) and kept evolving without any guidance
I use terms all the time that are only metaphorically accurate
but I'm not wrong
noooo the guy with the beard in the jewish fairy tale forbids this