Normie mentality

Watch this video, and if you actually believed the man that the circles were of different sizes at first, then you do not belong on this website.
You now understand why we live in a clown world.

What do we have that we have not been given? We even think in words from language we learn exclusively from other people. all behavior is learned, meaning all you are is taught.

blue circle is higher intensity than red circle

camera POV puts blue circle closer than red circle

Fuck off you retarded faggot, you and the guy in the video should be executed.

Like three people in the room raised their hands. The class room wasn't fooled either

probably because everyone is wise to these retarded crowd-pleaser "science" presentations that prey on people's delight with counter-intuitivity.

What a fucking retarded presentation. As the presenter the audience trusts you because they came to listen to you. So when you tell them they're looking at an optical illusion and then 30 seconds later say sike you aren't making a point about the larger culture. You're just making your audience distrust you because you're purposely trying to humiliate them. It's like a dog who expects you to throw the Frisbee and then you don't throw it and you call the dog a dumbass for reflexively trusting you in that particular situation.

that isn't how trust is formed. the best trust strategies accept miscommunication in repeated interaction is inevitable, and always interprets the miscommunique as generously as possible. every other strategy is inferior. it has been proven through formal game analysis. you simply were never taught what, why, and how to trust. now ask yourself why on your own time.

You could be misinterpreting me by the very same logic I applied to him. I'm pointing out the flaws in the presentation and your point just sounds like moral grandstanding with infinite regression based on giving charity to miscommunication

the red circle is smaller because of the perspective of the camera

This is how they got everyone to believe the "Holocaust" actually happened.

As the presenter the audience trusts you because they came to listen to you

That's the fucking point. Just because someone is an authority figure and just because you are there to listen to an authority figure, does not mean you should give up your agency and implicitly trust and believe everything the authority figure tells you

that is the fucking point of it you moron

exactly. what is his point? it isnt anything he said. this is important, because communication occurs on multiple levels, and the best communication is effective in a different way on each level. in other words, everything is miscommunicated necessarily, and so it is ok to miscommunicate. simply because someone resists the miscommunication, without understanding the message, causes their flawed thinking to become immediately apparent--good for the teacher, good for the group.

Red

blue

"they are in fact equal"

Gee it really is that easy

As the presenter, the audience trusts you, because they came to listen to you.

That just reinforces the point. In todays world, loads of people take to social media to "get informed". They are exactly like the audience. They put their trust in others and are all too easily mislead.

Think back a couple of days, there were a bunch of threads purporting that Macron, Merz and Starmer were caught doing coke. A random person who by chance found the video by itself on some site wouldn't think anything of it. They'd see Macron getting a tissue out of the way to pose for the cameras. But the "audience" in this case was told that they were looking at something else entirely and they believed it. Trust in other peoples framing is a real problem.

yeah, I'm thinking OP is a fag.

blue one is bigger

its dey tradishun

the flaw with this argument, is that optical illusions exist and we know optical illusions exist.
We know our natural instinct cannot be trusted.
If I see two shapes that look equal and a professional tells me that they aren't equal, I'll sooner believe that the subject is about optical illusions than me agreeing with them about something that is false.

He did the experiment in lncorrectly
He didn't imply the difference but explicitly required it
In his version *any answer, included none* is incorrect
In the original version the question is
"See these two circles? Which is larger: left or right?" And not answering is correct

He actually failed to show how manipulation works by explicitly calling it out

This, blue is clearly larger

It's not that easy to tell which one is bigger if either just by comparing what's shown in the video.

He did the experiment in lncorrectly

No. False dichotomies are also something you'll need to be able to deal with if you're on Anon Babble. Sometimes the premise of an argument or a question needs to be rejected, there isn't always a right answer.

has visual perception of a woman

watch out when driving my dude

asks a question

um akshually you are all wrong because i misrepresented the question

what a retarded faggot, he reeks of midwit

No this is an actual experiment and the wording really matters
He did not follow the wording and changed it from a false dichotomy to an appeal to authority with a bald faced lie and an ambiguous answer grade

I teach philosophy, he 100% fucked this up

The problem is that his answer response is a requirement that the premise must be taken, so if you throw out the premise, you are incorrect
He p=!p this

most adults don't progress past stage 4
many are still stuck on stage 3 virtue signaling
these people will suck dick because of peer pressure

this isn't a good test because it makes it look like it could be possibly a little smaller. The line test shows this problem much clearer.

My first instinct was the blue circle was bigger because it looks bigger.

kek

That's a different experiment
This was *supposed to be* a false dichotomy experiment
He fucked it up

liberalism is the bottom pretending to be the top.

So what your really saying is “don’t trust science “?

False dichotomies are bald faced lies. If I tell you that either you support X or you're a Y, in most cases that's just going to be a lie and there's a million reasons why you may not support X. The only winning move is to reject the premise and call out the logical fallacy.

so if you throw out the premise

The premise being that they are of different sizes. Is what I mean, if you believe that premise there's no correct answer. You need to throw it out, the correct answer would have been to get up and measure them instead of taking his word for it that there is a difference.

Person in authority meant to educate you and tell you truth

Bet you didnt expect Id lie to you!

God normal fags are retarded.

I'm still on stage 1. I have no interest in further moral development.

Pure commie slop. Let me fix his presentation.

Basically... What these faggots want to do now is tell everyone that those 2 circles are exactly the same. There is no difference, at all. You can and should use violence and outcast anyone who dares say one is blue and the other is red. They are the same. Imagine how fucking retarded you have to be to believe that.

This is just "I was merely pretending to be retarded" the seminar

that is the fucking point of it you moron

Then he failed by a wide margin. After doing his gay "reveal" he proceeds to drop red pills to an audience that he's already lost credibility to.

look at 2 circles

they look similar

presenter says AKTUALLY THEYARE NOT THE SAME

oh cool is this some optical illusion?

the blue looks a bit bigger in the video

presenter I LIED THEY ARE THE SAME

presenter LOL SEE HOW EASY YOU ARE TO MANIPULATE?

presenter THIS MEANS YOU BELIEVE EVERYTHING JUST CAUSE SOMEONE SAID IT

presenter THEN YOUR KIDS WILL BELIEVE IT AND YOUR KIDS KIDS WILL BELIEVE AND YOU WILL BE RETARDED

presenter IM A HUGE FAGGOT AND I SUCK DICKS

There may be a point in his ramblings but this dude strawmanning so hard.

Person in authority meant to educate you and tell you truth

Yeah people you trust might lie to you. Lying wouldn't be a problem if only people you didn't trust did it.

I thought the blue circle looked bigger before he said anything, then I decided they were probably the same size and he was lying right about when he got the hands up.
This is why they hate schizos.

Didn't work. What a retarded video.

What if it's not development what if it's genetic.

If you have 2 circles or anything of the same size the brighter one may appear slightly larger

maybe this is better in person. i get his point and OP's but camera tricks are dishonest and so is framing , which is again part of the point. whether you got the answer right or wrong about circle size is not really an indicator of anything compared to something like getting the vax, wearing the mask, or continuing to think the vax is effective and safe.

also because the camera angle, there is a 10% size difference going by pixels. blue is right at 100px, red is 90px so this is, in fact, fake and gay

This is how they got white women to believe that niggers are actually human.

So that's how the BBC myth was born

Human mammals are easily swayed, conned, propagandized...

As the presenter the audience trusts you because they came to listen to you.

Only normie subhuman neurotypcal trash is vulnerable to these manipulation tactics

Your mental illnesses are not universal.