Gay travel index 2025

Gay travel index 2025

I call bullshit

safe for gay in nigger south africa?

Notice how every country in the red are third world toilet countries that no one wants to live in.

also why the middle east will never be a tourist destination

mexico and most of south america

safer than the united states

What retarded faggots. Honestly, I wish we were as hostile to homos as they imagine us to be.

Why do you have gay porn on your pooder?

yeah we know you don't have the balls to do shit

read this & understand its the same thing

russia

DEADLY

oh come on

I think Mexico is "greener" than the US in the OP just because of you.

yeah we have freedom to love whoever we want

Mmmmmm
Sooo muuuch gaaay

Kek savage

I like how Paraguay isn't very gay friendly. But Uruguay is one of the safest. Para means near. Must be sick of being near guays.

Japan more dangerous than the USA,india or Mexico for gays

Lmaoooo this is

If pride parades arent tolerated every day on every street in your country, then you are committing genocide against gays.

youtu.be/CzEbm7yup7g?si=UauXg2Ec7D_VR7ug

brazil

safe

They must think we still drag fags all the time behind trucks like in Brokeback Mountain.

brazil safer than US

HAHAHAHAAHAHAHA

Based deep red countries

Uh...purely research purposes

conversely all the green ones are hyper faggot and those kind of hyperfag societies invide the people from the red countries to come cause of self hatred of ur own race ansd the greens will become red. hilarious poetry.

America is the gayest place in the world. They only put it as yellow bc Trump got elected.

puto y orgulloso chinga

USA, Italy, India most gay friendly

What did they mean by this?

not even close to as gay as canada. In USA u have major faggot centres like california/new york/atlanta but then u have vast swaithes which are antifag. In canada wherever u go its profag.

Based China, keeping western faggotry in check
Kigurumi isn't faggotry btw

Hopefully we'll make dark red here soon. Yellow isn't terrible though.

All three of them begin with I

I'm noticing a pattern here

It is not by far.

>All three of them begin with I

cyka blyat
slava ukrinskiii
aca en mexico mientras lo hagas a puertas cerradas, no como en nueva york que ya se andan metiendo hasta dildos en la calle, mexico es demasiado relajado respecto a la degeneracion, pero teniendo al vecino yankee es de esperar

fakest article ever written

aparte aqui no peleamos por hacer transexuales a los niños como lo hacen los gringos

tons of spics are on the down low

Ever watched vk.com/video-74868793_456246287?to=L3ZpZGVvLTc0ODY4NzkzXzQ1NjI0NjI4Nz8- / en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Serbian_Film ? There are multiple scenes where he has sex with hookers he kills in the most brutal ways possible. This is... a very slavic way of dealing with gays: If I put a bottle in your ass it is not gay, and if it breaks it will make a whole Yugoslavian war.... When I rape you, it is not gay.

Now, on the topic of this picture: I want to rape and kill that manslave. I want to break a whole collection of rakija bottles in his anus. I want to kill him in the most brutal ways you can imagine and not one of them are gay. I am not gay, just a shizo. Put 100 like me in a country and it suddenly is no longer green for gay tourism.

Also the fag in your video is already butchered and stuffed in a suitcase.

USA yellow

You need to understand why things like this are made.

Remember that meme of women taking photos of things? How it's never actually about the thing itself, it's just an excuse to exhibit herself and the thing being photographed is just an accessory? You need to adopt a similarly critical mindset here.

This *looks* like it's meant to give advice to gay people on where is or isn't safe to travel, but that's not what it's actually about. Notice how the US barely ahead of Pakistan and Mali, despite the former being an Islamic theocracy and the latter having armed insurgencies and coups for the past 15 years? This is the clue. It's not about travel, it's just fearmongering aimed at gays in the US in order to radicalize them against the US. 99% of people in the US are either lib-leftists who want to shove homosex down everyone's throats, wannagrill boomers who don't care what you do as long as you leave them alone. Claiming that this is basically the same as Pakistan is just gays being melodramatic faggots as always.

while true, it also means that people should do more to make their countries redder. In Russia it only takes one tadjik or boomer to have a bad day and a gay person will disappear and never be found again. How many people have you disappeared in your country?

why does it offend you so much that 2 men hold hands

you sound like and extremely bitter and selfish person

huezil

safe

kekaro

selfish

This kind of shaming is counterproductive and benefits the far right because it exposes your own lie. If someone was actually selfish they wouldn't care if you called them selfish. The fact that you call people selfish expecting them to change their behavior in response shows that you don't actually think they are selfish, since actually selfish people aren't going to adjust their behavior out of concern for others. This shows that your movement isn't based around cultivating empathy, it's based around exploiting it. You are a consumer of empathy, not a producer.

it's selfish because it's entirely based around what you want for other people even though it has no negative effect on you

even though it has no negative effect on you

yet
you fucking paco muerdealmohadas

oh no 2 men are holding hands society is ruined!

Fuck Yeah Canada!

zesty

White people are oppressors!

even though it has no negative effect on you

Laws that allow the state to punish people for not being able to mind-read a tranny's preferred pronouns have a negative effect on everyone in society. I was pro-gay until the LGBT movement started violating the

no negative effect on others

clause that we all agreed to. In fact I was likely pro-gay before you were. You see that's the difference between you and me.

I was pro-gay in the past when being pro-gay was difficult. When being pro-gay resulted in punishment, I was pro-gay because I didn't let negative social consequences get in the way of doing what I thought was the right thing for other people. This is the opposite of selfishness.

You on the otherhand likely only became pro-gay after it became part of the dominant culture. When being pro-gay results in pats on the back, you are pro-gay because you want the social benefits that come from holding the dominant views. This is the definition of selfishness.

Shaming doesn't work on me when I embody your values better than you yourself do.

Our countries were nicer places to live when they were dark red.