Most powerful weapon ever created kilo by kilo

most powerful weapon ever created kilo by kilo
destroys military industrial complexes
destroys empires
demoralizes whole armies
nothing can see it
nothing can stop it
it only costs less than an abraham's round
makes the american defense industry look like fools

How is it in 2023, buddy?

Drone warfare is the endgame. Dissidents need to start using this

military incompetent complex

A fucking piece of string could defeat these!!

idk. did you win yet, buddy?

Never stopped

source: the kremlin times

It’s UN bro

You might want to stop fucking in your eyes

now post the projected end of the 3 day military operation

Over 1 million russians died in Ukraine. Died. Gubarev said so himself.

you might want to stop riding putin's dick

We’re ~20 mil hohols away from it

Ukrainian officials of high circles stated 500k dead hohols BEFORE the counteroffensyiv and Kursk adventures and no one batted an eye. But had some Gubarev uttered a number…

most powerful weapon ever created kilo by kilo

Nuclear weapons average 5000kg of TNT per kilo.
1kg of C4 equals 1.127kg of TNT, leaving the drone (weighing 500+ grams) at less than 0.5kg of TNT by weight.

destroys military industrial complexes

Fuels them. Suicide drones and anti-drone weaponry are MIC products.

destroys empires

No empire has collapsed or been destroyed.

demoralizes whole armies

Then those armies would have given up and gone home. They have not.

nothing can see it

Broad spectrum radar, eyeballs, RF trackers, AI cameras.

nothing can stop it

Birds, other drones, a shotgun, string snares, jammers, moderate rain, water in general.

it only costs less than an abraham's round

Training a pilot to deliver rounds effectively is quite expensive: soldiers aren't always the most dextrous creatures and the sticks are tiny. Military cost of training per hour x 200 or so hours of flight time + cost of drone + cost of explosive. Gets cheaper if your pilots live longer, more expensive if you lose them routinely.

makes the american defense industry look like fools

Here's 60 companies that are US based that produce drones. This does not include US based drone defence companies, that specialize in jammers, drone identification, or RF tracking in general.
modalai.com/pages/us-drone-manufacturers-comprehensive-list

Your position on slav vs slav is irrelevant.
Drones capitalize on fear of the unknown, and inability of fresh units to appropriately respond.
Effectiveness drops rapidly with experienced units. Good, but essentially an IED with wings: you'll win your insurgency if you have enough. Utterly demolished in open combat or if being hunted by appropriately trained counter-insurgent units.

Start with a sim and a hall-gimbal controller. Learn soldering, learn drone flight characteristics, learn how the drone responds to different weights. Proper handling and skill development is key.

new weapon is developed

regular troops cannot defend themselves against it

requires specialized tools to neutralize

specialized tools are so effective as to make the weapon effectively useless, but only if the tools are present

Tank 2.0

ackshualy.....
i was waiting for you

You're right. Just think about it. A solider is really just another weapons platform. But it's an expensive one. Just someone who guides kinetic projectiles. The thing is, if you're playing a numbers game, that soldier had an expense and is an expense. All that money put into him to raise him to his enlistment age in his society, then the training and time, the housing, the loss of capital labor. And the expense of bullets, armor, evac, post-care, death indemnity, political repercussions for death toll, etc.

All the while drone spam, that are probably 98% cheaper than weapons platforms such as door kicking trigger pullers. CHINA ALREADY WON the long game. Simple as.

China #1

What the fuck is this shit? Once you detect the drone you have less than 10 seconds to act up. Will you have enough time to deploy this useless bullshit weapon?
Or are you going to have special teams of mongol orcs checking the skies 7/24 with this gun over their shoulder?

Why not just inundate the airspace of the trench lines with tethered balloons. Cables and netting between balloons would spool around drone rotors

2 more weeks then?

You failed to adequately prepare for my arrival.

And the expense of bullets, armor, evac, post-care, death indemnity, political repercussions for death toll, etc.

Militaries don't yet allow non-soldiers to act as pilots, so all of the above continue to apply to most drones.

probably 98% cheaper than weapons platforms

Drones are single use. They're cheaper than most missile systems, and will end up replacing them in time. However they don't replace soldiers or their role
As for AI motherships: running an AI is more expensive than running several tanks flat out.
Drone motherships can be hard countered by an AMRAAM or similar, and do not possess good stealth characteristics at this time (external sensors and payload, as required by the role).
.>Once you detect the drone you have less than 10 seconds
Once the drone detects you. If you detect the drone, you have many more options. Drones flying over long distance are frequently on pre-plotted courses, or looking straight ahead while the pilots leans on horizon mode and has a cuppa.

These things are great, they can carry dead bodies

$150k to destroy $400

very viable

you're so naive it's cute
i used the tactic called 'hyperbolization' for discrete purposes

you're so naive it's cute
i used the tactic called 'hyperbolization' for discrete purposes.

This thing will be the death of every non-democratic country.

Are you being retarded on purpose? You better not

'hyperbolization'

for discrete purposes

Hyperbole is for exaggeration, not discretion, idiotic nigger.

When I said soldiers, I meant vanguard assault infantry, shock troops. Drones can be simply designated as precise munitions. Battlefield effectiveness = cost - cost of losses = return on investment. For example, they don't have as much worth for instituting order in captured territory as does an actual infantry soldier. They're just another part of the arsenal making the battlefield even more dangerous for frontline soldiers.

Did you?

You nafo troons are so pathetic, you know everyone hates you right?

did you?

Nah, everyone hates you people. Calling everyone NAFO is no different to how leftists behave.

trident to keep the drone at safe distance

net to ground it

Checkmate.

Can a drone be stopped with a simple buckshot?

Can a drone be stopped with a simple buckshot?

Theoretically but its effectiveness is limited by range. By the time you could reliably shoot down a drone it might already be too late.

we're winning

easily stopped by radar jamming

Wait what has this class of gladiators been called again? :D

When I said soldiers, I meant vanguard assault infantry, shock troops

Even a soldier who plays brass instruments will cost over 500k to a western country, and be trained as an infantryman first.

Drones can be simply designated as precise munitions.

That require far more training than a missile launcher. Piloting one is finnicky, and they require maintenance and field repairs even from simply being transported.
The training to fly and ability to maintain are not something that can be done in less than 120 hours. A soldier can be deemed competent with a guided missile system in as little as 12 hours.
Training time is the largest cost of any soldier.

Drones can be simply designated as precise munitions.

Not yet. When the tech has advanced beyond boomer RF control designs that work for RC planes from the 70's, I'd be much more inclined to agree. For the interim period: they require much more investment than any comparable weapons system.

They're just another part of the arsenal making the battlefield even more dangerous for frontline soldiers.

Seriously impeded by training costs of soldiers who can operate drones effectively. However a PMC that provides rent-a-pilot services stands to make more money than JK Rowling, as they have no requirement to make every pilot a fully trained rifleman.

Droneguards are frequently used by mercs in ukraine. A droneguard is a squad member with a shotgun, and they are effective against drones they can see, particularly effective against larger drones. Smaller drones (tinywhoop size carrying 50g of high explosive) are much more manoeuvrable than a 7-inch carrying an arty shell or RPG head. They're also quieter, much easier to control when low to the ground, and can change direction very rapidly.
Shotguns work, but not in all situations, with a severe human factor. It's not like many soldiers have experience skeet shooting.

Ukrainian officials of high circles

very reliable considering you can't state their name

But had some Gubarev uttered a number…

some Gubarev

the moment a Russian is not longer needed he turns into none, traitor that shouldn't be trusted!

Most frontline drones use cables now.

You live 2 years in the past.

Guy with net and fork.

Net and Yahoo??

youtube.com/watch?v=O-2tpwW0kmU

it will always be deeply amusing to me that they warned drumpf would do exactly what they themselves ended up doing.

an abraham's round

what's an abraham? is that some retarded mutt measurement unit?

first and last time we see that reddit tier wunderwaffe

Don't forget dumbfire rockets and cheap garage homemade missiles that apparently cost hundreds of millions per missile to counter.

most powerful weapon ever created kilo by kilo

that would be some kind of biological weapon due to replicating
unless we in gray goo era already