Warcrimes?

Not a ruskie, but this seems kind of fucked. Again kill all Russians, I hope they lose, I hope their government dissolves, I hope Putin gets raped.
I mean warcrimes are basically rules for warfare. Both agree not to do fucked stuff like this, if one does it the other can as well. I wonder how the world would react if Russia ; Got a civilian truck, Dressed as civilian, Filled with explosives, Drove it to a military target, Blew it up.

this is the sort of thing that gave israel the go ahead to bomb civilian targets

hiding as a civilian is a good way to get your civilians killed

And now theyre going to escalate and bomb even more shit bravo

Well what happens to that mindset if Russia decides to do the same? They could target politicians on all levels directly, make Kiev another Dresden, kill all pows. Even use a few nukes to get rid of some troublesome resistance.

M-MUH WAR CRIMES

lmao

russia bombing civillian targets daily

ukraine bad for retaliating

kys asian boy retard

You red line retard are always wrong, Russia wont escalate because Russia is already doing everything it can possibly do to win

meanwhile russian bombs civilian places all over ukraine and somehow this is different

play stupid games, win stupid prizes

well this is a jewish war, so not really different then the Ukraine one, both being funded and coordinated by jews or useful diots for said jews

Now with those bombers they aren't lel

This is war, there are no rules
thats what nobody gets
You do what you have to win

yes, israel did it with exploding pagers too (and much worse) without international repercussion
its becoming normalized

this is a lie.
If we all accept that war crimes don't exist then retroactively everything during the Nuremberg Trials is moot (which I agree)

imagine pretending there are any rules in a war
only the winners can make rules anyway
every one lose in a war if you win you get the explicit right to make rules
I asked several years ago what would a win looks like for Russia or Ukraine none of them were able to tell. I bet they still can't.
If you've seen your whole village get bombed and everyone you know dead or exiled. You see life differently.
And why do you think they're not doing so?

yeah its a war crime by genua convention

Are you retarded?
Military targets were targeted, not civilian flats.

it's a warcrimes when Russia does it

kek nafo fingoloid, herbed your stale spam

how is blowing up military equipment a war crime? dont be retarded.

Yeah goymany said this in WW2 and look what happened after lmao

War can always escalate and get worse

russians have been using civilian vehicles for the entirety of the war. thousands of unmarked donkeys, for example.

they used civilan trucks

Destroying enemy bombers is a warcrime.

Why?? It just is, okay???

two can play this game
imagine russia dropping these shells full of AI controlled drones on ukraine

Just dont start seething when the other side retaliates and does something similar

what are they going to do, target a school? bomb a theatre? a nursery? a kid's hospital?
oh wait

I mean they shouldn’t fight back at all, isn’t that right?

Unironically this.
Ukraine in its own defense should have the god given right to rape and maim any Russian anywhere in the world as it sees fit.

>LETS FIGHT A MUCH STRONGER OPPONENT FAIR AND SQUARE!

The video is from a Ukrainian attack on Russia. The airbase is Russian. China hasn't constructed any military bases in the region yet.

larping as a civilian before you attack is indeed a war crime

you can use civilian vehicles when they marked as military
ukraine used unmarked vehicles

Legitimate ruse of war.
Go back home to Russia and cry some more about muh warchimes.

so what's your opinion of the french resistance during ww2 ?
all war crime terrorists ?

Oh but it isn't war, it's special civilian operation.

Warcrimes?

More like butthurt kek a couple of ukies with drones are going to cause the Russian government to meltdown

Yeah.
If they do it, they're evil criminals. When we do it, we're justified in our holy struggle. Been that way since Nuremberg.
Unmarked military equipment constitutes a war crime. This one goes back as far as Hague.
There have always been rules in war. Since literally antiquity, people have tried to mitigate the destruction of war. It's this mentality of "must win", pride, that leads to these retarded conflicts dragging out. Not to mention the modern world is built on agreements and genuine attempts at upholding law. Ukraine and Russia are both signers of Hague and Geneva so there's no ambiguity about this. No one will get prosecuted so war crimes will remain a joke, however.

Russia should send a strongly worded letter to the UN to complain.

larping as a civilian before you attack is indeed a war crime

achsually its not, just raise your colors first

do you see any obvious russian markings on this russian military vehicle?

muh civilian targets

Go back to plebbit.
That couldn't be further from the truth. For the entirety of the conflict, Russia has not made a single attempt to eliminate Zelensky, or to target the government district in Kiev.
(This seems to be a mutual agreement though, as piggers haven't tried that either).
Nor has Russia declared war and started a full mobilization. Nor has Russia attempted to strike at Ukrainian nuclear power plants (or even the majority of regular ones), or, most notably, the Kiev Hydro power plant.
There are way too many things Russia could escalate.

No, its not, deception is not a warcrime. Engage in battle while wearing civilian outfits without markings is a warcrime.

Not that ziggers know anything about war crimes, they just cry about it when they get BTFO.

No vehicles. They would have to militarize donkey, and that might be suspicious.

muh war crime

call the war police faggot

can't wait for reapatriate volksturm

2 more weeks

Unmarked military equipment IS a war crime. They fucking kvetched about this in Iraq. That was their justification for striking Highway of Death.

There have always been rules in war. Since literally antiquity

Fuck no. The only rules of war is whoever win make the rules.
History prove it over and over.
If Germany didn get backstabbed by everyone even from inside and had won ww2. Do you think they would have been subject to the "international communities" rules?
Fuck no. They would be the ones making them.
Oh wait...

but isn't this literally a warcime

Not really. Civilian vehicles can be used freely for warfare, and it would be only a warcrime if they used some international identifier such as red cross for it.

Also if it was a warcrime, then russia using old ladas and civilian motorbikes for attacks would have been also a warcrime.

oh? is larping that you're amassing at the borders as part of a training exercise with belarus, insisting that the west is paranoid, having your entire government make speeches to the effect that you are not going to invade anywhere and everyone in the west is stupid and insane to think so a war crime - when you do indeed launch an attack that night? you seem to think pearl harbor was a war crime, but russia launched this attack the exact same way.

"No rules in warfare"

Righty O then.

Starts using chemical weapons

Clouds of gas

Nuclear bombs going off

Strapping alive women and children to the front of armored vehicles

All targets are valid, nothing off limits

Start wearing enemy uniforms

Start wearing disguising as civilians

0 concern over civilian lives, kill everyone you see. (Russia kills civilians, but it could be way worse)

There are some common playground rules to war that both parties agree to. When one side breaks a rule, the other one can too. Rules are good for both sides.

you retarded

Terminal attack video released.

files.catbox.moe/95ne9h.mp4

There is literally a hole on the Chernobyl sarfacagus because a Russian drone shot it?

Containers are not military equipment.

That was their justification for striking Highway of Death.

You're retarded. There is no justification needed to attack fleeing enemy troops. Keep coping, faggot!

Unmarked military equipment IS a war crime.

you're allowed to fly false colors as long as you raise true colors before engaging in combat

t. "anarchist" complaining about rules not being followed

no, there are crimes

makes no sense to say this, they committed a lot of war crimes there, do you not read history?

It's a war crime if you lose. ONLY if you lose.

Not to mention the modern world is built on agreements and genuine attempts at upholding law. Ukraine and Russia are both signers of Hague and Geneva so there's no ambiguity about this. No one will get prosecuted so war crimes will remain a joke, however.

Laws without mechanisms of enforcement are not laws you fucking retard. The Hague and Geneva in a modern context were post-war allied damage control. That really is it. The rules based order was always a farce.

It's literally only a warcrime if you lose the war.

then where's your country list of crimes?
you carpet bombed half the world for several decades
when the winners do a warcrimes it's "collateral damages"
when the loser does it, it's scandalous
was Israel pager attack a war crimes?
was the hannibal directive a war crime?

its more about goverments rules i dont opted in
ukrain opted in into geneva convention so they should obey it

Killing your enemy while dressed as civilian is a war crime?

but isn't this literally a warcime?

Warcrime number 6831420.
I stopped caring about warcrimes after that Russian soldier used a knife to cut the balls of a Ukrainian prisoner. I think that was late 2022? Don't remember.
Every day there's a new warcrime.

was Israel pager attack a war crimes?

no, it was one of the more surgical strikes ever, the targeting was handled efficiently by the target

The only rules of war is whoever win make the rules.

Hague and Geneva were both made at times of peace.

ww2

Is an example of subjective application of the rules. Allies should have tried their own but refused. Post-facto implementation of laws should have been dismissed. Everyone knew the rules and knew this but le world order decided it had to do what it wanted.

Again, everyone knows the rules.They're quite agreeable if you read them. It's just that every government is a pussy and would never ever abide them if it impedes their jewish overlords.

i'm an anarchist and the geneva convention should be obeyed

And indiscriminate bombing of civilian housing isn't? As our mutt friends put it, FAFO.

as per international law it's considered ruse of war
which is legal

yeah

problem ?

take a number and have a seat mr.zigger complaints will be heard in order

The original concept was so much cooler. Why does everything real have to be so lame and gay?

youtube.com/watch?v=7FwDMzIbZrg

It's what lead to the US killing a bunch of random civilians in Vietnam.
Their army use uniforms, so there's no way to know who's an enemy than to just kill any Vietnamese person you see.
So yea.

No Uniform = More civilian deaths in a war

its a code. once a state starts using false flags and civilian infrastructure, everything is game. waving a white flag and then bombing shit is more for protection than criminal proceedings.

caveat emptor, nigga

That couldn't be further from the truth.

Yeah I know that is what you think zigger, you chug propaganda strait from Putin's ass. Where is the escalation from ATACM and storm show hitting inside Russian borders.

The only rules of war is whoever win make the rules.

It's not that simple, because winning is only the first step in establishing control. You need to prove legitimacy still. to support it with violence for a long time and your army itself will begin to degrade to bandits, if there is no law, then there is no law against soldiers. who can start killing because they are stronger and have won, including your people.

After all, if you have to stoop to war crimes in order to win, then you've clearly started a war that you can't handle.

Interesting that warcrimes in your minds only go 1 way. Pretty jewish of you kikel.

Their army didn't use uniforms*

This. Russians should kill truckers on sight

But you start bitching the second Russia does a thing

isn't this literally a warcime?

The WHOLE WORLD is just powerful people doing whatever the fuck they want to do and then slapping a post hoc legal rationale on it for public consumption. Please tell me you don't buy into the illusion that there's some sort supra-national arbiter of justice that imposes law on nations the way the legal system imposes laws on you...

Any time in modern history where a "war crime" law was theoretically enforced, it just just powerful nations ganging up on some powerless nation to depose its leader for their own ends.

There is no justification needed to attack fleeing enemy troop

Nigger, the US is the one that used it. They claimed it was Iraq committing a war crime.

Containers are not military equipment.

It literally has military equipment inside it. I swear you fags will say the stupidest shit.
This is true, but disguising as civilian is not the same.

Laws without mechanisms of enforcement are not laws you fucking retard.

No lol. They're not effective but they're laws. All it takes is implementation for them to become relevant. Law is hoops and hurdles because of that.

The Hague and Geneva in a modern context were post-war allied damage control

They were both drafted and signed before the war. There is no confusion. You're right, rules based order is a farce but only because ruling parties refuse to uphold them or approach them with any genuineness. Like when the US said it would invade the Hague if any US service member was prosecuted.

same here they didn use it to do terror attacks
they targeted legitimate military targets exclusively
a whole lot of words to convince yourself you're totally not agreeing with me
of course you will only be able to make the rules it's up to your regime to enforce them and that also historically failed miserably several times

After all, if you have to stoop to war crimes in order to win, then you've clearly started a war that you can't handle.

I can picture you in the trojan war. Getting slaughtered and telling yourself as a Trojan "Those pesky greek and their fucking horse, they can't respect the rules of war".
I don't support that brother war. On any sides.

I didn't think I had to spell it out, but fine.
I stopped caring about war crimes, both ways, from either side, a long time ago.
Happy?

The Trojan War is just a fairy tale. Rather, it was just a donkey with gold.

kek I kinda like you

I don't agree with you. War crimes do exist and should exist. World governments and the ICC should stop being pussies and start trying these motherfuckers. All of them, from the bottom up. And people SHOULD be giving up their own when they're obvious war criminals.

I think the most criminal aspect of this is that the drivers were civilians who had no idea what was going on. This lends credence to the (DEBOOONKED) fact that Ukraine used a suicide truck bomb on the Crimea bridge with the driver totally unaware. I think that's a pretty unconscionable thing to do. Not just involving civilians, but using civilians as delivery systems. It's pretty fucked up.

HAHAHA DEAD OIKRANIANS HAHAHA

HAHAHA DEAD ZIGGERS HAHAHA

NO FAIR HE ATTACKED WAR CRIME WAR CRIME HELP HELP

HAHAHA DEAD...

Can you two just sign Trumps gay papers already so we don't have to hear from you retards again

I'm not an expert but why do you even think this qualify as a warcrime ? You've never heard of covert ops ?
War crime is bombing civilians
they bombed military targets
War crime is disguising as medics or journalists
they didn't

Nigger, the US is the one that used it

Listen, you retarded fucking sub 80 IQ nigger, the US didn't need any justification to bomb Iraqi troops on the 'highway of death' as there is no justification needed to bomb enemy troops.

The only time its illegal to bomb enemy troops is when they are clearly signalling their intent to surrender. Dumb fucking faggot.

I think that's a pretty unconscionable thing to do.

well, on the other hand civilian workers are a legal target if they're participating in siege works

NOOOOO YOU CAN'T JUST BOMB STRATEGIC BOMBERS THOSE TUPOLEVS WERE FILLED WITH HECKIN WHOLESOME DAGESTANI ORPHANS N SHIET DAS TERRORISM

Getting slaughtered and telling yourself as a Trojan "Those pesky greek and their fucking horse, they can't respect the rules of war".

Literally all of the Achaeans were stranded for years after the war because they behaved dishonorably and deceitfully. Same with Achilles. Nigga do you read?

they were literally filled to the brim with african food aid ready to ship out

you retarded fucking sub 80 IQ nigger

So much fucking irony from a dumb fucking slav mongrel that can't read my fucking post.

THE US IS THE ONE THAT INVOKED THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS TO JUSTIFY THEIR ATTACK. THEY WERE THE ONES THAT SAID IRAQ WAS COMMITTING WAR CRIMES BY HIDING AS CIVILIANS TO FEIGN THEIR MOVEMENT. THEY NEEDED JUSTIFICATION BECAUSE OF BAD OPTICS YOU STUPID FUCK.

Fucking dumbass retarded drooling monkey nigger.

Muh warcrimes, doesnt stop Russia from all of theirs. How about you hand those stolen children back from the tajik rape families you put them with.

World governments and the ICC should stop being pussies and start trying these motherfuckers.

I don't remember voting for any of those peoples, so forgive me if I don't respect their "rules".
You missed the point.
Plus that war lasted for a decade. They were stranded because a decade long hardcore war with your neighbour is kind of a bad idea to begin with. Over a bitch too.

they didnt operate it from russia. Ghost of civilian stoey is fake to hide something else

Again, you dumb retarded illiterate nigger faggot. The US did NOT need ANY justification to bomb Iraqi troops on the 'highway of death'.

Fucking troglodyte.

Fuck, did they just get chat gpt in your eastern european shithole? I think I'd take the bot over trying to communicate with someone as stupid as you.

covert operations are absolutely war crimes a lot of the time, the way they get away with it is by not officially existing.
Think about it. Name 5 covert operations that weren't made known due to a leak

No? Otherwise, any form of covert saboteur action would be a warcrime.

Ukraine is resorting to nuclear terrorism and blackmail to derail peace talks. They want to start a nuclear war between the US and Russia. Trump needs to depose Zelensky before we all literally die. Any attack on the nuclear deterrents or defenses of a nuclear nation warrants a nuclear response.

Fucking nigger retard with his faggot copes is too fucking braindead to comprehend even the most simple of concepts.

Just fucking hang yourself you waste of fucking oxygen.

no, it's not illegal to be in civilian clothes. Whatever gave you that idea?

Russians already did stuff like this.

We're talking about a world where small children are getting air-striked for posting videos to help their classmates who are being starved to death. this is pretty low down the chain of war crimes going on right now.

major train terror act in Bryansk

zero news about it on pol

HMMMM

The crime is disguising yourself as civillians, shit for brains. Now Ruusia can assume any civillian is a troop in disguise.

Its only a warcrime if you lose.

but did they CROSS STATE LINES???

They're not effective but they're laws.

No. They are not. “The law” implies an enforcement mechanism behind it. The purpose of laws is to lay out a code of conduct for people to abide by. If they do not there is no enforcement then there is no point in people abiding by said code. If there is no mechanism of enforcement, and I would go further and say a selective enforcement, the law becomes words on paper. That is it. Prohibition was the law but it was such an unenforceable mess it was ultimately abandoned at the behest of some of its greatest proponents. The words on paper were changed to meet reality. It is the greatest example of a law being nullified out of existence based on lack of enforcement.

They were both drafted and signed before the war.

And evoked post war by the allies despite their misbehavior. It was selective enforcement which made the law meaningless.

but only because ruling parties refuse to uphold them or approach them with any genuineness.

Because they do not matter and are meaningless. The powerful will use power despite what the law says. The obsession with laws reigning in conduct is enlightenment cuckery not based in reality. Get that though your thick skull. You think the Hague is going to prosecute Ukrainians who torture POWs? No. Because the “law” isn’t for them. It is for the “other.”

They got stranded in the Iliad, because they pilfered temples and killed women and went too far. Achilles died because he refused to return the body of Hector. These are all legends, they're meant to have a moral aspect. The Achaeans behaved dishonorably and violated conventions of war. Obviously these aren't modern war crimes, but the principle is definitely there. There are things everyone agrees to in war that are too far.

damn, this is what they did? that's crazy. probably not a warcrime, no

What's Russia gonna do about it?

no
even kremlin didn't react on this
it would be hillarious if chuds will whine on this
or not, they are retarded after all

No lol. They're not effective but they're laws.

Wow, that;s some cool shit man!! I'm now instituting a law that everyone in my city must begin paying taxes to me.

and the international criminal court is in the Netherlands.. kek

I don't like the ruskies, but

No, you're supposed to say the same wrong thing again and again. Train your bot better.

shit i wish that were true ukroniggers have deserved it for the past 10 years

you're mixing up everything and diverting from the subject. Read up on what constitutes a war crime, it's not that hard you just google it and the AI will give you a summary. Takes 5 seconds

The eternal mutt talks
Join both world wars in second half where there was clear victor already and when everyone was exastued from it
NOt just that, manage to somehow in their eternal bravery nuke 2 civilian cities.
Procede to think they are shit they aint and chimpoint in ol Nam.
Reality check kicks in

all we are saying is give peace a chance.

You are worse than french faggot WORSE

No, deception isn't a war crime. Pretending to be a civilian and then attacking is. So in your scenario if Japan came in civilian aircraft and attacked, yes.

Unmarked military equipment constitutes a war crime. This one goes back as far as Hague.

its called "camo" dingus.

should be wiped off earth

mongoloid fins

There are things everyone agrees to in war that are too far.

The legendary duality of an american. Seemingly preaching moral superiority while stumping you with a star of david stamped boots.
Then why don't you apply that so well crafted judgment to your own country and the quantity of civilians you killed for absolutely no fucking reason whatsoever?
Japan?
Vietnam?
The Middle East?
Korea?
Where was the convention of war when your President sent so many planes to Japan if it would to ever happen today peoples would probably believe it's AI and CGI?
Please tell me.
Where's that convention of war when Israel shout on Israeli to justify a genocide?

War crime is disguising as medics or journalists

You are a retard just making shit up. All troops must be in uniform or they can be shot on sight

uhhhhh what?

I don't like the ruskies, they should be wiped off the earth, but isn't this literally a warcime?

All Ruskies Must and WILL HANG BTFO

I like to imagine all the angst and stress induced shits that is happening in the Kremlin.

you win or you lose
when you win you just say whatever your enemy did were warcrimes

oh? is larping that you're amassing at the borders as part of a training exercise with belarus, insisting that the west is paranoid, having your entire government make speeches to the effect that you are not going to invade anywhere and everyone in the west is stupid and insane to think so a war crime

No, because those forces on the border were clearly marked as Russian troops, not civilians. It’s a crime to larp a civilian because it inevitably causes civilians to be targeted now that Theres so distinction between the two and any civilian car or individual can be a hidden combatant, car bomb, transport etc.

Name 5 covert operations that weren't made known due to a leak

define leak and I'll try

no understanding of the purpose of law

It is mostly written to protect civilians, not protect enemy forces. This is like arguing that you got an STD from raping a woman.

Well, niggers and jews are punishment for all of this.

That's right, the purpose is to protect civilians. Because if the enemy is travelling in civilian trucks now civilians are at risk in the future.

I want the glowies tonknow despite my satirical comment history I will not evade a draft, kill all the bad guys

“The law” implies an enforcement mechanism behind it

Not necessarily. Common law is all about precedent rather than statute. It's why Hague and Geneva have zero delineated penalties. They're not gonna dictate x amount of years for such crime because then it becomes a game.

Prohibition was the law but it was such an unenforceable mess it was ultimately abandoned

Prohibition was not abandoned, it was unpopular and removed. By law. It was enforced too, tons of alcohol destroyed and century old farms literally burned. In much the same way that destroying US currency is technically illegal but no one gets arrested for throwing away a penny or tearing a dollar bill. It's not gonna be enforced until it needs to, that doesn't mean it isn't a law and doesn't have significance.

It was selective enforcement which made the law meaningless.

It was not meaningless to those that had it enforced on them or the officers hanged. It's only meaningless in its spirit and moral validity. This is exactly why law is dangerous, a seemingly unenforced law can suddenly bite you in the ass. Ignorance to crime is not a defense either, sadly.
I completely fucking agree with prosecuting every US soldier that commits war crimes. It's one of the few things I feel very leftist on. Abu Ghraib and all that middle eastern shit is a fucking slander on the US's name.

Scarface was put on trial, by Jew infested post WW2 courts no less, for dressing up in Allied uniforms, and it was found an OK "ruse of war".

THERE ARE RULES TO WAR YOU MUST FIGHT FAIR AND SQUARE! YOU MUST FOLLOW LE RULES!!!!

kys

lul, russians did so many war crimes, that i almost have no sympathy for them

STFU peninsula evader
STFU
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_Conventions
The whole rules of warfare are adopted

its for civilians

fucking Breivik missed a few

I'll give them a pass because its funny as fuck.

I wish, white men is tioo noble to slash orc faces indiscriminately as they deserve. Russia is just too kind and noble, that's why all subhumans are against it. Pick literally anyone who hates Russia and he will turn out to be a subhuman who should be exterminated for a betterment of the white race.

Yeah, it was one of those war hawks from the think tanks that claimed Iraq was committing war crimes by disguising their troop movement with civilian cars and hiding behind evacuating civilians so they should prosecute Iraqi soldiers for the highway of death. This was on Fox news or some shit way back when the whole thing was bad publicity. It was obvious nonsense but the point is it isn't a forgotten rule.

bro are you a roman general?

NO you can't just use tricks and strategy that cheating

fight me head on wwwhaaaaaaaa

Bullshit

Using soldiers disguised as civilians to conduct military operations is considered perfidy and is classified as a war crime under international law. This tactic undermines the protections afforded to civilians and violates the laws of armed conflict.

It’s not like Russia was making a distinction between civilians and military before this.

And all that facilitated through 'neutral' countries. War is always a crime.

And we all get them. I tell you we're fighting the wrong war fren.

Not a ruskie

You glow harder that the polonium in Monke's underwear.

so russia is going to kill civilians in russia then? What is your point if any

shut up, Otto Skorzeny was tried for war crimes and he walked, later started a private mercenary company with ex-military US colonel

Yeah, just like bucha where all dead people appeared a couple of days after the Ukrainian troops entered there. Europe is doomed because it got involved with the Ukrainian nationalists and decided to realize Hitler's dream of expanding the Reich in the East again. It doesn't matter how many moral excuses you come up with for why you are different from your Nazi ancestors, but the path and the result are the same.

kek ;) this

Yes, call the UN.
Or grow some fucking balls for once.

yeah, you fascist pieces of shit should be exterminated for a betterment of the white race.

kek ;)

A civilian conducting a covert operation is not automatically a war crime, but whether it is or isn't depends on the specific actions taken and the context.

Legitimate Ruses of War:

>Wearing civilian clothes to infiltrate enemy lines for espionage or sabotage is considered a legitimate ruse of war .
> However, using this disguise to fight in combat, assassinate individuals, or engage in other acts of perfidy is prohibited and constitutes a war crime .

Perjury and Unlawful Combatants:

>It is a war crime to kill, injure, or capture an adversary by feigning civilian status .
>Persons engaging in military operations while disguised as civilians may be considered unlawful combatants and denied prisoner-of-war status, potentially leading to trial and punishment .

You discord troons lie without shame
Its clearly a war crime

Fuck off faggot
Its clear

Article 37. – Prohibition of perfidy

It is prohibited to kill, injure or capture an adversary by resort to perfidy. Acts inviting the confidence of an adversary to lead him to believe that he is entitled to, or is obliged to accord, protection under the rules of international law applicable in armed conflict, with intent to betray that confidence, shall constitute perfidy. The following acts are examples of perfidy:
The feigning of an intent to negotiate under a flag of truce or of a surrender;
The feigning of an incapacitation by wounds or sickness;
The feigning of civilian, non-combatant status; and
The feigning of protected status by the use of signs, emblems or uniforms of the United Nations or of neutral or other States not Parties to the conflict.

That's how they did it? That's literally a terrorist attack and war crime.

if Putin can buy drones from Iran and China and use them to attack shit not just in parts of Ukraine that Russia claims, but deep inside Ukraine that even Putin says is Ukraine, seems like its OK if Ukraine "buys" drones, or cruise missiles, or whatever and hits targets inside Russia.

Rules Of War wise, there wouldn't be anything wrong with Ukraine getting an assload of top-tier various missiles from various "foreign suppliers", maybe even that passed through a few different client States of USA, just for the lutz, and putting Russian economy back to the Stone Age.

also, I think the point of the geneva convention is to submit to it if you want its protection. You can't break the convention every weak and asks for the opposing party to follow its rules. That doesn't mean Ukraine should not follow it, but it's not for russians to complain about it

It's called honor. Countries with more than 50 mil people never get it.

warcrime

Status of civilian casualties: 1 churka driver and 1 noviopoid

True story

Taking out the Moskva

Nordstream destruction

Counteroffensyvs

Kursk Incursion

Truck to launch drones

You have to admit, the Hohols are fucking hilarious. I've been LMAOing all morning. Even if it was only 5-6 jets and not 40 it's still a big win for the hohols. Daddy Putin should've listened to Daddy Strelkov lol

I'm not an expert

Clearly

but why do you even think this qualify as a warcrime

Disguising yourself as a non participant is a warcrime. This was established in WW2. But it doesn't really matter. Ultimately war crimes just mean things the winning party doesn't like for 90% of things. The only objective war crimes are indeed killing of civilians who didn't wish to participate. Anything else is actually politics and winners getting revenge and tactics that were annoying effective against them.

we don't know he wasn't wearing like a little yellow and blue arm band they have to wear because they also have exactly same uniforms, guns, boots, tanks, etc.

Who cares it's a war what do you expect

whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/02/imposing-sanctions-on-the-international-criminal-court/

last time I checked your white house was imposing sanctions on the international criminal court to protect Israel genocide so go out find something green and touch it
"rules" my ass

seeing the drone leaving the truck is kino af

Scarface was put on trial, by Jew infested post WW2 courts no less, for dressing up in Allied uniforms, and it was found an OK "ruse of war".

That's not why he was acquitted.
He was found not guilty ultimately because they had no proof. He also challenged that so long as uniforms were abandoned before combat operations there was no violation of the treaty.

Nah, this stuff is great. Putin will get heart attack and someone like Medvedev gets in power and levels Kiev and Lwów so well they won't even need to use asphalt for the resulting parking lot. This will be Korean war all over again with Chinks and Norks sending in 800k-1mil troops and beating down Ukranians with stones and cricket bats. Only this time, there will be no 38th parallel.

Shut the fuck up you ork. Your "nation" is literally the laughing stock of the world. A potempkin village trying to be a nation. You are Nigeria with snow with per capita poverty and AIDs rates to match. Your GDP is equivalent to Mexico, and you grow browner every day.

You claim you can fight harder as if you were fighting with a hand tied behind your back, but the reality is that one was amputated from exposure to soviet era industrial machinery, the other from an FPV drone.

Your premiere formations of VDV and tank guards were obliterated in the clusterfucked zerg rush to Kiev. Your demographics collapse has been accelerated by your fighting age youth either being dead or having left already, and those that remain being too seriously weak or infirm to fight. Armed with rusty AK's, plate carriers with no actual plates and ww2 steel helmets with modern covers you're running out of even mothballed museum pieces to throw at the wall to see what sticks. To add insult to injury, you turned to North Korea of all nations (whose soldiers, stunted and malnourished spend more time masturbating to porn than fighting) to supply your aging hardware with surplus you sold them years ago to aid your aging and flailing industry.

The three day operational objectives have become a four year long war which saw your best mercenaries rebel at Moscow and have land seized from the Russian people by a foreign power in the first time since world War two.

Now your nuclear triad gets hit and you cry fowl while posturing all tough, while those very planes were used to strike indiscriminately at civilian targets. You don't get to complain anymore. You're worse than a rogue state. You're a dying an decaying empire, and if you didn't have Nukes the responsibility thing would be to dismantle you and balkanize you.

russia is gonna escalate? i thought they wanted peace from day 1. not good optics at all!
but entirely expected, it's just further proof that russia doesn't want peace, let alone a ceasefire or mere negotiations.

Not necessarily.

Your entire argument is based on this implied mechanism of enforcement. >Common law is all about precedent rather than statute
You’re conflating how a law is created and it’s enforcement. Both require mechanisms of enforcement. The “reasonable prudent person” standard is a creature of the English courts and created in the famous hay stacking case. If you’re sued for negligence, are found liable but refuse to pay the state can come in and take your shit to sell of to pay the injured party. This is the mechanism of enforcement which makes the law of negligence law, not just words on paper. Without it you have a piece paper saying you are owed money.

because then it becomes a game.

The law is quite literally a game.

Prohibition was not abandoned, it was unpopular and removed.

it was just repealed

Because it was immensely unpopular and proved to be unenforceable. Entire criminal networks were built on the sale of illicit alcohol and were nearly impossible to take down. It was overwhelmingly unenforceable because there were more stills than the revenuers could possibly destroy. Mabel Wilebrant gave up on it because it was such a mess and undermined the law as a whole.

It was not meaningless to those that had it enforced on them or the officers hanged

Did they subject themselves to the same standards they held others to? No. It was a matter of convenience to them. That is it. They won, the other lost. They had power, the other didn’t. The spirt of the law didn’t matter at all. The strongly worded opinion of the courts which tried war criminals were merely words on paper when we actually examine the history. You’re latching onto ideals that do not meet reality.

the only crime is puccia still existing

cool nigel, btw you're being replaced by indians and africans with every passing day

How is this in any way a war crime? They tricked a russian driver to drive this shit near the airfields.

Life just keeps going in war torn areas, huh?

Ukraine is going balls deep into war along with NAFO but Russia is still pretending its some sort of police action.
The only solution is to fully invade Ukraine and end it as an independent state.

The entire Crimea and Donbass was a huge falseflag by Russia. Ukraine is allowed to do everything they want by those rules

True
The whole "war crime" notion exists to bitch about your enemie's actions. So this the correct way to use it.

They send few generals to hague later and say sorry it was other government and war.

It's a warcrime yes. It will simply open up the door for similar attacks on ukraine

yup
vae victis

Yep, that's how it goes. You can do however fucked up shit you want, as long as you have the strongest army left when it's over nobody will sentence you for anything.

It's still not a reason to act like an animal because you have to live with the people for many decades.

no such thing as a war crime against foreign invaders

seethe vatnigger
Russia just got KWAB of the century lol

kinda like russian civilian clothed people bombing and burning industry and shopping malls all over europe?

what if jewish civilians are killed though, doesn't that become a war crime

No.

The only solution is to fully invade Ukraine and end it as an independent state.

That's not a solution to anything. That's not going to stop this kind of attack which is dirt cheap and incredibly easy to organize. Russia just needs to recognize that they lost.

They disguised themselves as Russians, so not really civilians (or Homo Sapiens).

Great, so you will go back now that Ukraine has basically won and quit hiding your neck in Germoney?

we lost 8 planes

we lost 5 planes

we lost 2 planes

you are here

we lost 0 planes

we only lost an oxcart full of shit parked next to one of the airfields

we actually gained several planes because a drone blew up a spare parts hangar and all the parts miraculously landed to form multiple new planes

I just don't care what happens to Ukraine and Ukrainians after they use such tactics. Hypocrites before Satan.

kek ;)

its not a war crime, because there is no war according to russia
they never declared it after all

military uses civilian trucks, trains, AIRLINERS, etc all the time for transport including of weapons and soldiers in and OUT of uniform.

WTC was a valid military target on 9/11 because unlike the Israelis that all decided it was a new Jewish holiday, the US military recruiters showed up at the recruiting office.

IMO all recruiting stations should be only on military bases and if its a mile from the gate that is OK for any punks that want to join.

Also no military personal should be allowed to fly civilian.

Are you upset?

They're basically same people wrapped in different colors.

That's actually the fun stuff I want to see form the Orc civil war.Hilarious.

тepпи, тиблa

but isn't this literally a warcime?

it's war. no one cares about rules.

Sure, but no conflict is free from warcrimes. Its a nice thought tho.

Kang Solomon here is right, and besides, nearly all invaded nations will resort to such underhanded tactics, just look at what Balkan women did to Axis men, nearly all of whom were literally boys in their teens, it was enough to make even the soviets disgusted.
Case in point, I’m in Maryland, and so I’m in a border state, we get the best and worst of both worlds, something the old timers said a lot was, “had the rebs armed their women, they could have won the war, but no, chivalry wouldn’t allow them to, and who’s flag do they fly now?”
In a war of extinction, you either go all out, or you end up like South Africa (at best).

war is a crime

war crimes don't really exist

you win or you lose

Come say that again when Ukraine Finland and Poland gets nuked pro NATO terrorist.

implied mechanism of enforcement

Yes, because they're usually separate. Where do you find a law that tells you who will come arrest you and prosecute you and under which statute and when? Almost every law is subjectively applied when convenient. It's simply the nature of the legal system. Again, it's illegal to destroy money, but the FBI does not have a penny pinching division. It is still law and people will absolutely get pinched on it if they go too far. The FBI is not cracking down on niggers shooting dice on the corner, but they will take down illegal gambling dens.

Because it was immensely unpopular and proved to be unenforceable

Prohibition WAS enforced. The alcohol industry was absolutely gutted. Prohibition was not effective, but it was enforced and it was law. There is way too much detail to argue on when it comes to prohibition that it's not even suitable to do here. Your basically arguing because niggers keep stealing and murdering each other, it's not illegal to steal or murder. But moreover, prohibition is not a good parallel to war crimes beyond the topic of enforcement. The selective enforcement of prohibition in some counties is a great example of exactly what I'm saying, the spirit of the law is lost when subjectively enforced. It is not meaningless, however, because someone is getting affected by it.

ideals that do not meet reality.

That's everything in human history. The legal system has never been perfect and no law has been 100% enforced, that does not mean it just suddenly does not exist.

and yet you cant do shit about it

Depends on who wins, the winning side is never held accountable.

But they did not target humans, so no crime in warcrime.
It is more of a sabotage spy mission where the target are some equipments.
Am i right?

Remember when the dancing in drag jew president at the start of the war gave civilians weapons making them enemy combatants, baiting out non-jew civilian deaths so he could cry warcrimes?

have a spy drive a truck behind enemy lines and park it near a critical infrastructure

OMG WHAT THE FUCK THIS GUY IS DISGUISING AS A CIVILLIAN THIS IS A WAR CRIME AAAEEIIIII

We are the same as you the same with saami living in your north. The ukraine is notorious being a rape play ground for arabs and mognols raping them for centuries until we freed them (several times).

who's gonna arrest who?
the world police?

lol somebody is triggered.
Honestly US is more of a Potemkin village than Russia at this point. A government so pathetic that it doesn't even know what technology it has.

Russian journalists asked the head of Russian negotiating group, Vladimir Medinsky, a question - how would he comment on the strikes on Russian air bases.His answer - Wait for tomorrow

So you're saying nothing of value was lost, except some old planes.

These american flags, I swear americans are such pussies. I bet they would let a home intruder fuck their wife if it meant de escelation.

Ukrainian hide military elements in civilian infrastructure

Kvetching when they get struck

Ukraine was mining roads west of Kiev at the beginning of the war to stop their own citizens from leaving. They've committed pretty much every war crime on the books and every accusation towards Russia is simply a confession.
I'll admit Russia's hands aren't clean either, but the sheer audacity to plant landmines in playgrounds while press ganging your own citizens (including the mentally and physically handicapped) and then shooting them for having bad morale is astounding.

or general incompetence because westoids keep importing low IQ niggers to fill the jobs

good morning saars

yes

I'm going to be honest, this might warrant a strategic nuke. This is likely the single most provocative war action I've seen in my 115 years on this wretched earth. Always thought it would be Pakistan/India but they seem content to mostly dance on their borders at each other. This is like being on the fucking titanic and you get kicked in the balls (gotta keep the references in line with cognitive capacity, here)and called an incel for pointing out it's really cold out and there are icebergs at this latitude.

ukraine kikes are the scum of the earth all they know how to do is warcrime

two more weeks

no, they don't fill any jobs like that (for some reason)

russia is on video randomly killing civilians and castrating a ukrainian soldier alive but you want me to care about ukrainians using innovation and deception to directly attack purely military assets?

lost

kek
Whatever, allowing Ukraine to exist and an independent state will be a loss for Russia.
Once NAFO went all in with Agent Z, there was zero chance of Ukraine making a rational choice.

Is there any info on how they managed to get drones to russia? Did they somehow move explosives past customs? Or did they assemble the drones in russia?

Can you even commit warcrimes if you're not at war? Or has Russia escalated from special military operation to full scale war?

it's not even close to being perfidy
fucking snowflakes

I don't think russia checks for explosives.

Sabotage is war crime? It's obvious that you can't pull it off without someone from the inside giving you a hand.

this

im sure british kikes helped them

How the fuck is it a crime to attack military targets? What Russia does daily, besides their evil invasion, makes this pale in comparison

Whatever, allowing Ukraine to exist and an independent state will be a loss for Russia.

Yeah and that's what will happen. They're going to lose, it's now far too easy for even non-state actors to inflict great damage on your country. It's nothing but suicide at this point to continue making enemies.

"Khamenei, we just had our bombers destroyed by rockets launched from civilian logistics vehicles. You have experience with this sort of thing, how do we respond?"

"Ah yes we have dealt with this many times. First you must raise the yellow and brain flag of pee pee and poo poo. Then, a strongly worded tweet. That should do the trick."

They russians were just lazy and didn't check the top of the truck for hidden compartments.

making enemies

Oh gear Fritz be very careful what you wish for.
Russia is in a war against NAFO - Ukraine is essentially irrelevant at this point.

Russia will cut off Kiev - sever all road and rail transport links into and out of the city. It's basically over.

just look at what Balkan women did to Axis men, nearly all of whom were literally boys in their teens, it was enough to make even the soviets disgusted.

I never hear of this. Can you in to some sauce?

Russia will cut off Kiev - sever all road and rail transport links into and out of the city.

I can guarantee you that they won't.

yeah using civilian disguise is a warcrime
but they attacked military equipment so it justifies, ukraine is a terrorist state anyway so it doesnt matter what they do lol

Your mum tell you that?

Why can't Russians stop crying about this and calling it war crimes when they literally, purposefully, target civilians and civilian infrastructure that's completely unrelated to the war? God they really believe should just be allowed to do whatever they want while nobody is allowed to touch them, no wonder all of them are cheating niggers in online games.

Russia will cut off Kiev - sever all road and rail transport links into and out of the city.

how? with their non-existent bombers?

this

nazis also acted the same way as russia today "no! you cant just retaliate!!"

hahaha dilate ruski bots

weak pidorussia will collapse in your lifetime and you will have to cope with it

glory to Ukraine, total zigger death

kek
joke of a country

No international body actually cares about war crimes unless they happened during WW2 and can be blamed on the Germans or can be used as a pretext for a military operation that will benefit it's members.

nooooo not the h*cknig warcrimeeeeeeeeeooooo

They’re a liability because of their obsession for filming everything. When you’re doing stuff like this you shouldn’t film it.

This. Ukrainians could sniper kill Russian children luke the jews do Palestinians and Americans would still cheer them on.

Name one time that happened then.

still in civilian disguise

war crime

That would make things like special forces and undercover operations a 'war crime' according to this logic too.
Every military could theoretically use the existence of spies as an excuse to murder all civilians because 'they could be spies, impossible to know'

nice try vatnik. kidnapping children is a war crime, breaking your toys isn't one

Rescuing orphans kicked out into the street in a war zone is not a crime, faggot.
Why did Zelensky make no effort to evacuate them?
Why did 160 of the kids on the list turn up in Germany? You nafo faggots are trafficking kids and blaming it on Russia.

Why can't Russians stop crying about this and calling it war crimes when they literally, purposefully, target civilians and civilian infrastructure that's completely unrelated to the war?

Russia thinks lying is a virtue.

It's like Russia last week saying the USSR never formally was taken down therefore the war in Ukraine is an 'internal Russian matter'.

They believe that invoking complete bullshit like this actually gives them some legitimacy. This may be because in Russia telling lies and not getting called out on the lies is considered impressive. If you lie to someone and he knows you're lying but he doesn't say it then that means you 'won'. This is called Vranyo.
It's a verbal equivalent of intentionally bumping your shoulder into another guy in a bar and if he doesn't react then you're meant to feel superior.

Civilized countries don't have a concept like this that requires a word of its own because it's completely stupid shit that only impresses primitive morons.

everyone is trafficking kids. It's musical chairs at this point.

War crime? I don't know. But Ukraine is fighting for its life, so I doubt they give a shit.
I don't see what's the difference between using your superior firepower to attack your neighbor head on, and them using their own weapons and stealth to attack you?

TA ЗA ЩOOOOOOOOO

I don’t remember what exactly they were called, but you can probably easily find them by looking up Serbia and looking for historical accounts of the female regiments. The one story I remember most was how they would strip the boy soldiers naked, tie them to a table, and dance upon them while wearing sharpened high hails, they would usually do it well enough as to only burn through a soldier a night, most of said dancing was on their privates. The older soldiers would be cooked alive basically.

Strapping alive women and children to the front of armored vehicles

That's dumb, everyone should be strapped to all sides of armored vehicles.

Well if you travel with organs you need paperwork. Easier to keep them alive and transport kids untill you find a buyer for thier organs.

Did the drone operators get killed before they could flee or did they know it was a suicide mission?

true.

sounded like an old guy on video so probably suicide or maybe they had pickup

It's not a warcrime. They attacked military targets. It was rather clever thexscale of it. But it's certain death for any involved and caught.

What gets me is how stupid it actually is. Stupid those planes aren't in hangars and were sitting on the tarmac. Stupidly it also provokes what kind of response?

In any case the war escalates. Escalates into a point of what return? There's no return from waving a white flag and then attacking with it. Seemingly any notions of agreements or play acting and didn't know aren't gonna fly. Who knows what that actually means. Except escalation.

Escalation where awful governments are keener to constantly insert themselves further into it. Until it's nearing that point of all in and much larger war... Who cares today.

The Ukrainians commit war crimes all the time. And they have the audacity to broadcast them all over the media and internet. That is why I am no longer supportive of them.

Go be a cunt somewhere else Fin, we know you’re on a VPN or something because no one in Finland would suck up to Russians.

MUH WAR CRIMES

If you can’t take the heat, stay out of the fucking kitchen Pidor Pidorovich.

You’re here to sew doubt. If you had any idea what a fucking war crime was you wouldn’t have posted this.

warcrimes warcrimes

There is literally a Russian fever dream 3d animation where they pretend to do this to the US.

I thought ukraine agreed to a cease fire ?

Heat? Is it what you call gullible? It is what you call gullible.

Enter basic probability into any computer what happens next? Explain it.

Add to that people dont like being lied to. Government sponsered propaganda has turned millions of people against ukraine.

Legally those planes have to be out in the open so the US can count them via satellite.

Second time I heard that

w-we just don't WANNA escalate! hmph! b-baka!

if not for tom clancy & co. writing books about the spooky russian boogyman to boomers nobody would even know where russia is on a map

Ukraine is making senators and congressmen rich and all they had to do is tell Zelensky to keep poking Putin because we will take care of it.

AI says you wrong

The SALT treaties, specifically SALT I and SALT II, did not require nuclear bombers to be in plain sight, but they did impose limits on the number of strategic nuclear delivery vehicles and aimed to prevent either superpower from gaining a significant advantage in nuclear capabilities. The treaties focused on arms control and verification measures rather than visibility of the bombers.

Yer we should just fire nuclear missiles at eachother

Tactics and strategies are warcrimes? Let's just club each other everytime.

> NOO YOU CANNOT BOMB US BACK

> YOU HAVE TO LET RUSSIA BOMB UKRAINIAN CHILDREN // ELDERLY

UHH OHH ASSHOLE

EVEN THE INDIANS
ARE LAUGHING AT OP

IT'S PRIGOVER... BILLIONS MUST CRY. WAGNER HAS FALLEN. SHOIGU IS RETIRED. THE USSR HAS COLLAPSED. FINLAND MAY BE NEXT ASWELL.

I WAS RIGHT
THE FEDS WERE WRONG
ENJOY 20-30 YEARS OF WAR

this total war

Considering that the Soviet Union currently has 0 strategic bombers I doubt either of those treaties matter.

THEY SHOULD HAVE LEVELED KYIV IN THE OPENING 2022 IF THEY HAD AN IQ ABOVE 90

NOW UKRAINE HAS ANTI-AIR DEFENSE SYSTEMS // GUNS EVERYWHERE
HOW ARE THE RUSSIANS THIS STUPID

I FOR ONE
BLAME THE JEWS
& TWO WORLD WARS

THE DRONES WERE ASSEMBLED
INSIDE OF RUSSIA

RUSSIA HAS A TERRIBLE SECURITY SITUATION RIGHT NOW

FIRST THEY CANNOT DEFEND KURSK // BELGOROD
AND NOW THIS

IT'S GOING TO GET WORSE ANONS ISN'T IT... S-A-D.

this

YOU MORONS DIDN'T USE YOUR AIRPOWER IN THE BEGINNING OF THE WAR

THANK GOD
THE RUSSIANS ARE RETARDED

HOW
THE TABLES
HAVE TURNED...

Vin aigre.

The chair is against the wall. John has a long mustache.

You're a dumbass. Trump threatened it? Yes. A few days ago? What did he say exactly. Pull it up?

HELLO DUMBASSHOLE PAKI ANON SHITSKIN NIGGER MUTT

80 IQ SUBHUMAN
TRUMP IS TOO BUSY TYPING IN ALL CAPS ON TWITTER BEGGING PUTIN TO 'STAPH THE WARRRR'

YOU'RE
A RETARD ;D
YOU'RE HERE FOREVER TERMINALLY ONLINE LOSER.

POOR SUBHUMANS
LOSING A WAR THAT THEY STARTED
AWW POOR BOO BOOS. CRY ABOUT IT.