Putting an end to this meme once and for all

FACT: Jesus was not an ugly manlet.
FACT: Jesus was the perfect man, that's why he had to die.
The jealousy, the seething he caused. It all makes sense when you consider, Jesus was a beautiful almost perfect specimen of a man. Carefully created by God and sent to Earth and save humanity.
Good things are beautiful, and beautiful things are good. Why wouldn't his perfection be reflected in his physical form?

My personal belief is, at its core, the idea of a beautiful Jesus with an ethereal, almost Pleadian like appearance makes people feel insecure. They hate the supernatural aspect of Jesus and the sheer power of his aura. They want desperately to believe he was just some sandal wearing hobo. It's also deliberate malice and worship of ugliness (ontologically Jewish behavior).

TL;DR Jesus was a Chad otherwise Christianity wouldn't have started at all

Be honest with yourself. Would you die for this guy? He looks like he's about to hit you with a Google Play card scam.

Meanwhile: Jesus as depicted from literal supernatural visions

I'm inclined to agree.

WHY DID JESUS TORTURE PIGS FOR FUN?!?

INCORRECT
WRONG THINK ALERT

>TL;DR Jesus was a Chad otherwise Christianity wouldn't have started at all

Be honest with yourself. Would you die for this guy? He looks like he's about to hit you with a Google Play card scam.

That's a fair point, do you think a woman would wipe a mans feet with her tears and her hair if he wasn't a Chad. That a sub-chad would somehow amass hundreds of followers? That he'd be well liked by men, women, and children? That's very hard to believe.

Multiple visions confirm he looked like that prince of peace painting and that he has piercing green/blue eyes

Fact: Jesus was a jew (if he ever existed)

I also don't think that God would need to test his beggoten son by making him physically imperfect like that. It would get in the way of his mission.

obligatory

Checked & sourcepilled

Even AI written by jews says that Jesus looked nothing like them and looked European instead.

Your false brown god looks like andrew huberman. Why worship a sandnigger?

The old testament prophecies say the messiah will be short and ugly. You blaspheme.

The old testament prophecies say the messiah will be short and ugly. You blaspheme.

No it doesn't, piss off.

Your anger won't change what the Bible says. Vanity is a sin.

Thanks for informing us JIDF but unfortunately, we are not White. It is of no use to us, sorry.

Your anger won't change what the Bible says. Vanity is a sin.

Prove that scripture says messiah was short and ugly.

For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant, and as a root out of a dry ground: he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him.

He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and we hid as it were our faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not.

Painting Jesus as a physical "chad" is vain blasphemy.

Your Jew book literally says he was ugly in Isaiah

Stop trying to force he was a white America biker Cesare Borgia so you can feel better about your kike worship

It's referring to his countenance and the way he would be treated. That he would walk among us as a man you wouldn't look twice at in the street. Not OY VEY HE WILL BE AN UGLY MANLET with a crooked hook nose and beady snake oil salesman eyes.

Isaiah 53 isn't about physical appearance.

1. "No form" (תֹּאַר – to’ar)

Meaning: To’ar refers to appearance, form, or shape, not specifically beauty or ugliness.

Translation Insight: The phrase "no form" means Jesus didn't have a striking, notable appearance that would attract admiration. It doesn’t imply He was ugly but suggests His appearance wasn’t remarkable by human standards for a king.

Key Point: To’ar shows that Jesus didn’t have the expected physical majesty or royal stature, not whether He was beautiful or not.

2. "No comeliness" (הָדָר – hadar)

Meaning: Hadar refers to splendor, majesty, or royal beauty, not personal beauty.

Translation Insight: "No comeliness" means Jesus lacked the external glory people expected from a ruler. It doesn't suggest He was unattractive, but rather that He didn't have the royal appeal expected of a king.

Key Point: Hadar emphasizes that Jesus didn’t have the outward majesty of a grand, conquering king—His mission was humble, not about physical beauty.

3. "No beauty that we should desire him"

“No beauty”: The word yapheh (יָפֵה) means beauty, pleasantness, or desirability—the kind of attraction that makes someone desirable.

“Desire”: Chafetz (חָפֵץ) means to desire or take pleasure in something appealing.

Translation Insight: The phrase "no beauty that we should desire him" doesn’t mean Jesus was unattractive. It simply means people didn’t desire Him because He lacked the earthly beauty or royal appeal they were expecting. They rejected Him because He didn’t meet their image of a king.

Key Point: Yapheh refers to worldly attraction—people didn’t desire Jesus because He didn’t fit their expectations of what a king’s appearance should be, not because He was physically unattractive.

Thank you for the effortpost and swift dismantlement of that nonsense

Pilpul cope

The verse clearly states he was unremarkable even ugly

Not some white model lmao

jesus never existed you retard. none of the gospel writers or paul ever claimed to have seen him in person. it's all jewish schizo crap

It says he will have no "form". If you look into what word was translated to this in the kjv you will see it means stately form, or stature. And it quite explicitly says he will have no beauty.
You reject the word of God out of your vanity. You need to repent.

it actually means the opposite of what it says

No. Your sin of vanity is causing you to deny Christ.

>it actually means the opposite of what it says

No. Your sin of vanity is causing you to deny Christ.

The context and the original Hebrew prove it's not even talking about physical beauty in the way modern people think of it. Again it's in context of Jesus being the messiah suffering servant and the crucifixion. Nothing to do with whether he was ugly or not.

Absolutely, God bless.

its close...

Christ will always be King, Jim

Threadly reminder jewsus failed to return in the apostles lifetimes despite declaring it

It clearly says he will not be attractive or tall. Your pilpul won't change the scripture to mean the opposite of what it clearly says.
Vanity is a sin , you need to repent.

So according to you, is every church depiction and commissioned art of Jesus such as Divine Mercy and the Prince of Peace are "vanity" because Jesus isn't ugly enough?
The point is, Jesus is being depicted ugly on purpose as an attack, and he wasn't, by the simple fact that many aspects of the story just wouldn't check out if he was actually unbearably "ugly" as you claim He was

Pic related, apparently blasphemy because Jesus doesn't look like Quasimodo

The key words in Isaiah 53:2—to’ar, hadar, and yapheh—all contribute to the understanding that the passage is not concerned with modern concepts of physical attractiveness, but rather the absence of external, worldly markers of power and majesty.

To’ar (תּוֹאַר) refers to "appearance," "form," or "shape," but it is more about the general outward form rather than specific physical features like attractiveness. It is used in contexts that describe a person’s external presence, without implying anything about beauty or charm in a contemporary sense.

Hadar (הָדָר) means "splendor," "majesty," or "royal beauty," and it is often associated with the grandeur or splendor of royalty or high status. This term suggests that Jesus did not have the expected outward splendor or glory of a king or a ruler. It doesn't suggest unattractiveness, but rather a lack of the regal or majestic qualities people typically associated with a king.

Yapheh (יָפֵה) means "beautiful" or "pleasant," but in this context, it’s more about desirability based on external beauty. The phrase "no beauty that we should desire him" indicates that, while He may have been physically appealing to some, He was not someone who inspired the typical, worldly desire that a royal or a conquering king might evoke.

But the Lord said to Samuel, “Do not consider his appearance or his height, for I have rejected him. The Lord does not look at the things people look at. People look at the outward appearance, but the Lord looks at the heart. (1 Samuel 16:7)

And he said to them, "You are those who justify yourselves before men, but God knows your hearts. For what is exalted among men is an abomination in the sight of God. (Luke 16:15)

"I'll take so-called Christians not understanding their own (Jewish) religion for 500, Alex"

by the simple fact that many aspects of the story just wouldn't check out if he was actually unbearably "ugly" as you claim He was

Exactly. explain how this makes sense if Jesus was short fat bald and ugly

That's a fair point, do you think a woman would wipe a mans feet with her tears and her hair if he wasn't a Chad. That a sub-chad would somehow amass hundreds of followers? That he'd be well liked by men, women, and children? That's very hard to believe.

every

No, the first Christians and many denominations of Christianity view depictions of Jesus as blasphemy. And depicting him in a way that implies he did not fulfill the prophecies is denying that he is the messiah. You are letting your vanity cause you to spit upon Christ.

explain how this makes sense if Jesus was short fat bald and ugly

Because he was the Son of God and the godly were drawn to his spirit. Vanity is a sin. You need to repent.

Because he was the Son of God and the godly were drawn to his spirit. Vanity is a sin. You need to repent.

That doesn't make sense, it's basic human nature to be repulsed by the physically ugly.

but what about these other denominations bro

Well, I'm a Catholic. We already sorted that business. I feel a snakeyness from you. A jewey energy. I mean this sincerely.

it is blasphemy because depicting jesus is idolatry and forbidden by moshe's laws

It does make sense if you believe the Bible and are open to the Holy Spirit. Your sin of vanity is blinding you.
I will pray for you brother.

He didn't gain a following of people being unbearably ugly. He was average at worst.

Dreams and visions prove he was/is handsome with green/blue eyes Look into the story behind the prince of peace painting

Catholicism is rife with pagan influence, idolatry, and blasphemy.
Jesus Christ is the Son of God, the Messiah. The Bible is the word of God.
Vanity is a sin.

He gained a following through his Word and spirit, not through vain means.

Vanity is a sin.

not through vain means.

Can you explain what this means exactly?

I'm on to you friend I don't trust you.
This isn't just about "accurately" depicting Jesus, although, that's what we're actually doing. It's a wedge in the greater war on beauty, and by actively DEPICTING Christ as an ugly bum, bad actors are using it as an angle to weaken modern Christendom.
It's the same angle as tearing down beautiful old buildings and putting up shitty glass and concrete blocs, or redesigning nice old ornate logos into shitty "pop art" new ones. Uglification and the crushing of the human soul by satanists.

Dreams and visions do not prove that Jesus did not fulfill the prophecies in his physical incarnation on earth. Suggesting that they do is blasphemy.

Vanity causes pride, jealousy, envy, haughtiness. Look to the reasons for monks shaving the middle of their head.

Jesus spoke words, he preached, those who were open to the holy spirit heard him and were drawn to him. Jesus did not draw people to him by flexing and posing like a model, no. Jesus brought a spiritual message, not from vanity.

I am going to pray for you. You are rejecting the word of God and Jesus' fulfillment of old testament prophecy to satisfy your own vanity.

not through vain means

He wasn't flexing, he was preaching. But, for that message to snowball and become what it is, he had to at least have a certain threshold of charisma, which is invariably on some level going to be connected to his physical appearance. It's not the main aspect or focus of his story at all, though.
I'm just saying, "not comely" doesn't mean "was ugly".

Jesus wasn't even jewish. He was born of the virgin mary and god shaped him in his image, roman and white. now all you kikes get lost

Vanity causes pride, jealousy, envy, haughtiness. Look to the reasons for monks shaving the middle of their head.

Jesus spoke words, he preached, those who were open to the holy spirit heard him and were drawn to him. Jesus did not draw people to him by flexing and posing like a model, no. Jesus brought a spiritual message, not from vanity.

But again, the original Hebrew proves that it's not about physical beauty in the way we modern people understand it, or that he was ugly.

Being beautiful doesn't mean you're vain. A beautiful animal or landscape isn't vain. It just is. Vanity is an inward facing and narcissistic sin. Simply existing and being beautiful isn't vanity.

He had the Holy Spirit. His people heard Him. It was not vanity that caused them to hear, it was their openness to the Spirit of God. Jesus was not a salesman pedaling a product that people didn't need. He fulfilled the prophecies. I am growing tired of you denying Jesus as the messiah.
I am shaking the dust from my feet. Goodbye.

You worship a jew rabbi that was circumcised and celebrated passover

Anon that's a rabbi upset other jews conducted business at the high jewish temple on a jewish holy day, have you ever read the bible?

It was not vanity that caused them to hear, it was their openness to the Spirit of God

Obviously, HOWEVER, speaking from a sociological standpoint, ugly Jesus still doesn't make sense. Both can be true.

every church leader ever says he is jewish

the bible clearly says he is jewish

99.999% of christians to ever live knew he was jewish

weak troll. fuck off retard

ok rabbi

Jesus Christ is transliterated from Yeshua Ben Yosef a Jewish rabbi baby rapist. Isho Cristos is the Assyrian/Greek (Real name) of said prophet. The real figure of the Bible was an extremely antisemitic anti Canaanite figure. In fact most of the Bible has been re-written by the evil Canaanite Jews to mock the “goyim”.

mary was jewish, jesus was not. uh seethe harder

mary was jewish, jesus was not

notice how the internet crusader utters heresies that would get them kicked out of literally any church. have you told your priest that, you clown

CHRUST IS KANG!! CHRUST IS KANG!!!

you're being baited, you realize that right?

The iconoclasms were fought to dispel those laws.

fact check: yeshua is a dead jew

It doesn't matter what the embodiment of God would look like, does it? It shouldn't matter what vehicle God chose to carry his message, should it? What is important is that you received the message. It is unfortunate that some decide to focus on the material world rather than the immaterial. The point of Christianity is that it all works out in the end.

Many will be shocked when they see his Mother, Mary the most beautiful women who ever lived.

Jesus was only a part of the movement. If the apostle Paul had never written his documents and spread Christianity to Rome we probably would never have heard of Jesus.

Fact: you are a stinking, shit-eating jeet

Thats nice.

it's me my friend. this is me. you'll never hear about me

Jesus died for your sins faggots

blasphe-me

t. almudic jew

“But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark; and they knew nothing about what would happen until the flood came and took them all away. That is how it will be at the coming of the Son of Man."

May 22nd, 2017 Trump @ Western Wall
November 2nd, 2020 this picture taken and posted to Anon Babble

1,260 days, 42 months

Every source listed there is a forgery, every single one. We have no historical sources besides revelations and Isaiah 53 depicting what Jesus looked like

Song of Solomon 5

very pale

Lmao your sources are all made up...
the absolute state of chriggers

Being a Christian is the most politically correct thing on Earth you could do, please leave this board

How can you tell?
christians are literal retards here

I don't understand how someone can read the old testament and see how jew like the hebrews are depicted and not be utterly revolted.... and still believe this abhorrent people wrote the word of God.

How do you know songs of solomon 5 is about Jesus?

sounds like you are faggot

Gullible nigger.

Blood is a factor when it comes to this, but you're right that the message is what truly matters.