Why doesn't men's body count matter?
Why doesn't men's body count matter?
both matter. Both ruin pair bonding ability and both ruin a potential partner for others.
It matters but inversely. It's good as a man to fuck as much as possible
It does if it's zero.
Men are the KEY women are the LOCK
It does, if you're over 25 and your body count is under 25, you're basically unfuckable
it's good, why exactly?
A key that opens any lock is a master key
A lock that is opened by any key is a worn out useless lock
But it does? How many women like a man with a body count of 0?
It shows you are a high value man and that you are good at sex
But It does, women love a guy who can bang every girl
yeah just because you compare the 2 doesn't mean they have the same implications. People are more than simple genitalia one has to get into. If you only think about it in terms of "locks and keys" you end up with a degenerate society that cannot progress
Men value purity, women value experience. However it absolutely does matter and impacts your ability to trust and love her. Some might say that's a good thing, as it makes you less susceptible to her emotional and social manipulation.
women are loving caring and monogamous
men are sex crazed and promiscuous
remove all social restrictions on sex
men stop having sex
women become profligate whores
pussy juice doesnt accumulate in the balls and will influence the genetic makeup of potential offspring
Men aren't women.
We don't collect women DNA.
We aren't wired the same.
Females retain the DNA of every mam they sleep with
no it doesn't? if you rack up a body count of different women maybe it showcases your social status or attractiveness but you can be fucking horrible or the very best, it doesn't matter if they're different
A man that can impregnate many women is a master man
A woman who gets impregnated by many men is a useless worn out woman
(it still works retard)
based and true
caring what women want
ngmi
women do not value experience. Women value the traits that allow a man to gain "experience", namely attractiveness
we are wired similarly and also lose the ability to pair a bond. You're right on the telegony front
39
Good.
correct
but the consequences for women are more visible
mental instability and dissatisfaction
men will cope with the damage internally
It does. People who get in to frivolous relationships cannot form strong bonds. So, a manwhore is as useless in being a solid partner as a tramp.
She has to carry the baby and she has to raise the baby and feed the baby. Do we want damaged goods carrying, raising and feeding the baby? Is that what you want for your kid? Dad doesn't have the same baggage, sorry not sorry take it up with god.
i'm not saying it's not an applicable comparison, i'm saying it's a retarded way to think about the world.
It matters just women care about it less then men. Men and women have different priorities. And really the short answer is women's low body count is worth more than men's. Getting a high body count removes the female privilege women start with.
wrong. if you're horrible or have a little dick you're going to notice women's disgust and boredom with you and lose confidence and be less likely to acquire more belt notches
The natural order is not retarded, there are very real practical reasons for it.
What other metaphor could you say that about & not look like a simpleton?
It's telling only the very dumbest posters on the board are still concerned with sex and breeding yet can't figure out the most basic of prerequisites required for relationships. Civilization is cooked.
it's all so tiresome
young men now not getting any labelled as 'incel' terrorism risks
Analogies are arguments retards make. See how easy that was to btfo
the natural order that allowed us to progress out of the caves in the freezing mountains is monogamy. Polygamy/polyamory leads only to death through either disease or simple conflict.
A man that can impregnate many women is a master man
A woman who gets impregnated by many men is a useless worn out woman
(it still works retard)
...they're disgusted and bored after they have already fucked you (This matters in acquiring a higher bodycount...somehow)
implying women are defining 'horrible partner' in the same ways a male does
You guys should research some serial killer fanmail
Because there is no inherent value in men's sex. In fact men can't be virgin, the word refers to a maiden who hasn't married yet. Men cannot be virgin.
Men can still bond after multiple partners.
Trvth nuke
Fake and gay
Because I'm not looking to date men. I don't care.
okay, why do you say that?
keys impregnate locks
IT JUST WORKS
kek
Correct but males are far better at dealing with the consequences. Women need to have their rights taken away or society will never recover.
Men don't get stretched out
I've had about 50 sexual partners in my time from 19 to 25 yo. some of them girls, mostly women.
I married when I was 26. my wife was virgin. I do not know how to feel, because I always feel bad when having sex with her. It is pure love. those before were never like this. fuck that. i wish i never did it before i got married...
Because men and women are different and value different things.
Because men’s dicks don’t get stretched out
be in charge of hiring
hire everybody with no standards
get fired
be job applicant
get accepted for every job I apply to
congratulated for my excellent resume and interview skills
The same way it is good to have a key which unlocks many locks, it is good to be a man who impregnates many women.
The same way it is bad to have a lock which is unlocked by many keys, it is bad to be a woman who is impregnated by many men, and at any rate a woman can only be impregnated by one man at a time.
It's real straight forward stuff m8e.
Name?
i'm not saying it doesn't make sense i'm just mad that it makes my argument look stupid
Lol
yes
whores are whores no matter the sex and points to poor partners and its ability to form an actual relationship
that's a nice palm that's been clearly neglected...
it doesn't, because my argument was not about what is best for achieving the most sex. it was that striving for the most sex is bad for society as a whole, for people of both sexes. I don't care about the gay metaphor because it is inherently a destructive mindset to be in.
hymen
pair bonding
Lock & Key, bitch.
It's the correct analogy, which is why it makes roasties seethe.