Should everyone have the right to vote, even if they are not well-informed about politics and government issues?
Should everyone have the right to vote, even if they are not well-informed about politics and government issues?
Women absolutely shouldn't have the right to vote. Feminism has been a disaster to the West and is the cause of its collapse.
Who decides who knows "enough" or is smart "enough" or morally righteous "enough" and why is it always the worst people who try to do it?
service guarantees citizenship
Voting rights are not universal even now, but I think they should be further restricted.
I think it's time we hand over all government planning and decisions to AI.
I propose a triumverate of three main AI cores. One that hates shitskins, one that hate kikes, and one that hates women. The perfect balance, for a perfect government.
No. The right to vote should have to be earned.
When the country was founded only land owners were allowed to vote. I posit that to earn a vote one must either
1) Have served in the military or as a first responder
2) Be the Head of Household for their family with a steady employment history
3) Performed an act that saved one of their fellow countrymen's lives
I have a proposition for you.
Flat % tax AND when you file taxes you decide where your money goes. If you think the health care system needs more funding, you allocate more of your flat% to go to health care than something you don't think is as crucial like feminist basket weaving comic books set in Lithuania.
Should everyone have the right to vote, even if they are not well-informed about politics and government issues?
No. The simple fact that low IQ's are breathing is already enough reason to make me mad and it is a insult.
sex with chinese anime 3d womens
This is accurate
You're talking as if society doesn't already filter people and gatekeep.
Nobody should have a problem with universities rejecting applicants because they're stupid and lazy, yet apparently some now allow niggers to enrol by typing the word nigger 100 times.
There are plenty of jobs in government and the private sector that require a clean criminal record and uphold a standard of behaviour.
If your IQ is below 85 you don't get to vote, if you're a recidivist or a violent criminal you don't get to vote, if you're a childless cat lady (by choice i.e. not a widow) you don't get to vote.
If you're a retard or you don't have a stake in the future of the country why should you vote or be in politics? We've got too many childless cat ladies in position of power as is.
I'll let you in on a secret:
Actually smart people don't need a government. It exists for the stupid people.
No one's denying thatt, but the government which is necessitated by the existence of retards, needs to be comprised of the best and brightest
Small groups of people can operate without an hierarchy, but for many, many reasons you could never organise the whole of society that way.
Anyone who wants a leadership role is suspect.
Being king of the retards is a punishment.
Nah that's a huge lie lol
Governments have moved civilizations. Without it would collapse
alan sex with SHEroyuki
FPBP
If you select 1000 people at random and put them on an uninhabited island they'll naturally form groups based on identity/interest and hierarchies within the groups, it's human nature.
Any system that depends on the good nature of humans is destined to fail (communism), any system that depends on the right people to be in power (monarchy/dictatorship) is destined to fail.
The best we can do is make it so there are checks and balances and accountability for those in power to dissuade them from abusing their power, and even that doesn't last forever and becomes eroded.
Society is held together by our collective belief that the institutions we've built actually work as intended, the moment you set a precedent that the rules don't matter that trust crumbles and politics becomes LARPing at best.
It is. Hence the entire doctrine of Christ. Leadership is meant to be sacrificial. It is not meant to give you power over others for the sake of enjoying a higher status.
So like half the people that voted for TrumP
Rules
Legislation does not dictate morality no matter how much people confuse the two.
I'm of the mind that we're all kings of our own castles.
Sure. Every vote counts equally.
The world's richest man and assistant crack whore living in the sewers have the same rights
Legislation is meaningless unless it's enforced and people's perception of the effectiveness of the law has a direct effect on people's behaviour.
Sure most people won't do anything bad even without the threat of retribution, but there are enough that will if given the opportunity, and it's even more demoralising for good people and encouraging for bad people when those at the top are exempt from punishment.
It's interesting to look at religion in that context.
Even the divine follows a hierarchical order and God has a kingdom, because that's what the people who thought it up knew.
The threat of divine punishment is also a perfect extension of government order, for most of history the enforcers of morality/laws were your peers in your village or the state, but you could still hide your crimes from them, but not from God, he is *always* watching you.
True
Trumpler wants to take away my welfare. I have to vote democrat because I can't afford to eat or go to the doctor without food stamps and medicaid
Democrats are basically bribing their low income voter base. Republicans will win every election for eternity if they leave welfare alone instead of advertising how they're going to cut social services every time they campaign
no
correct
You are both correct.
In US kids can vote from 18 yet they can only drink at 21
. And human brain fully develops into an adult at the age of 25
(that's why car insurance is so expensive before you reach 25)
My list:
1) Have served in the military or as a first responder
2) Be the Head of Household for their family with a steady employment history
3) Own a property
4) Pay taxes and aren't a burden to society (ie if you are a school teacher you live off other people's taxes and shouldn't be allowed to vote).
5) not a woman
Forgot, 6) should be over 25 years old.
If you are over 75 years old should pass cognitive test (bye boomers).
NO!
In fact, thwre should be an option to opt out and be exempt from jury duty!
NONE of the Republicans advertise how they are going to cut Social Security or Medicare / medicaid.
This is a Democrat anti-Republican LIES.
Democrats lie in media that republicans will cut social security , mostly to keep boomer votes
and mostly to make boomers think R are bad
while Republicans are the highest earners who pay for everything with taxes.
Then they will be rule by idiots.
People should only vote on local issues. They're by and large unqualified to make big decisions, and bigtech can algobait the population too easily.
People should sign up to guilds, which elect lords to represent them in the upper house based on their industry and talent.
Local representatives should elect national government.
Straight fight popular vote for regional presidents who act based and populist.
It should be only married couples with children that get a say in the nations future
Women should not
No because democracy is for suicidal white trash faggots and everyone who still buys it needs to hang himself right fucking now.
Democracy is as retarded as the people involved. Involving everyone serves no purpose other than to normalize gerrymandering, racketeering, and other criminal conduct meant to influence elections.
These are communists. They belong in a mass grave.
it might be time to go home.
I am home, stupid faggot. But I'm an Aryan, the whole world belongs to me. My kind own this fucking place, I can live wherever the fuck I want.
Well, by current rules of voting it really doesn't matter.
Voting is anonymous, and voters don't have to provide reasons for their choice. This means that a voter can accidentally put down the wrong choice, and when that ballot gets counted, it is assumed that that is indeed the choice the voter truly intended.
In other words, the current rules of voting only requires the voter to mark a choice, and that's it.
If the current system of voting counts a randomly or even mistakenly cast ballot the same as a ballot cast based on a careful value judgement, it essentially assumes that a vote is legitimate as long as the ballot is cast properly.
Under the current rules of voting, the age requirement is entirely arbitrary, and I am sure a fuckton of adults with a mind of a child vote at every election.
If I can't participate in the political process, why should I recognize its authority or respect its laws? Am I a slave?
No. Only landowning taxpaying white men should be allowed to vote.
They wish everyday
They stare at you from their ivory towers thinking
I wish anon did shit for me for free
Women’s rights and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
The internet proves most people don't have good judgement. Moderation on the internet also proves that basically everyone who attains power is a corrupt, evil retard who makes things worse and then tries to blame everyone else.
Niggers shoudn’t be allowed to vote.
no
the only people that should vote are landed white males
Good people don't need laws and bad people don't follow them.
The only reason bad people continue to exist is that good people don't want to kill them if they can help it.
Idiots will proclaim themselves kings and be oblivious to what smart people actually do or what is necessary for stable governance.
Internet moderation in a nutshell.
No, only landowning men. I think the balance was better back then
No, every woman should be excluded for starters.
So SHE"S the one making the BWC threads
Hiroshimoot…
Absolutely not. You should be able to answer basic questions such as who the present state an federal reps are, who your senators are, and be able to pass a civics test. People now vote majorly based on whether someone has a D or an R next to the name. Give people blank ballots for elections. They should be well informed about the candidates and issues, not have it spoon fed to them.
No.
In fact nobody should have any rights they do not actively engage with or defend.
If you don't into politics you have no rights to politics. Just like incels have no right to women unless they make it so. If you can't keep your abode in order then you should not have one. You make no effort to learn? GTFO out of school.
People do not appreciate what they get for free.
I'd go further and demand of people to actually be able to debate their political position without obvious bullshitting or fallacies.
If you do not properly understand your position you are not entitled to it, nevermind enforce it on others.
There should be an acceptance test
Mein Kampf audiobook (excellent quality)
odysee.com
The Ultimate Red Pill (Banned From YouTube)
odysee.com
George Lincoln Rockwell @ Brown University
odysee.com
Kevin MacDonald : Deciphering Jewish Intellectual Movements
odysee.com
Europa - The Last Battle (full)
odysee.com
Jared Taylor - The Color of Crime: Race, Crime and Violence in America
c-span.org
Jared Taylor - What we believe and why we fight
odysee.com
Jared Taylor - Basic facts on race in 13 minutes
bitchute.com
Jared Taylor - Whose country is this anyway?
bitchute.com
Newfag General #1 - /nfg/
4plebs.org
Why are the jews so obsessed with destroying the white race?
archive.4plebs.org
What was your biggest red-pilling moment?
archive.4plebs.org
Yookay Dystopia
Law of big numbers. Direct democracy is superior to anything else. Representative democracy is a joke though and can hardly be considered democracy.
Name one policy that was voted just by women or at least 80% by women.
Name last time you had a referendum about anything.
This is all your fault glowie stop deflecting.
Great logic retard. Tomorrow you would be declared criminal for some tweet and stripped of voting rights.
You know what you deffinetly have iq below 85 of you dont think this would happen immediately.
voting is decided by who knows our current buerocracy the best
Great only lawyers will vote.
Also what you retards don't grasp is the fact that you don't have voting rights as it is. Voting for a person instead of a policy is retarded. Person can always be blackmailed . Always. Policy with direct democracy cannot be changed.
If people voted purely based on how happy they were with their current situation it would work better.
And human brain fully develops into an adult at the age of 25
fuck off, boomers draging the average voting age up is responable for basically everything wrong with western countries