America is so disgustingly evil

America is so disgustingly evil

the country run by jews is evil

yes

Against: 2

Has 3 countries colored red

Whoever made this map is retarded

you don't know the half of it
brighteon.com/3d5aa0fd-1433-4013-8657-019fa316a44d

In America, rights are things you are born with, not things the government provides.

Okay I changed the law because I'm king of everything and food is now a human right. Why are people still starving?

Now zoom in
This is about genociding Gaza, nothing else

Every country votes to make food a right

You're evil if you don't give food

Who grows all the food

The United States

The United States is now evil for not giving away food to all the countries who want it for free

The United States is now the bad guy to ensure they're not the bread lines for the world

Kikes

Rights cannot be gained or lost (they come from God and you have them whether you like it or not), they can only be deprived under color of law. Any attack on a person's rights is illegitimate.

Feeding countries freely leads to countries with exploding populations that can't support themselves. They create welfare/slave states.
I don't have suicidal empathy.

How is food a human right ?

And who's going to make that food? If you're starving do you have the right to the food in my fridge?

fucking lmao, good catch. of course they only vote this way because their masters wanted it

No way... not israel...

house me, feed me, it's my right

and idgaf who works for it

fuck you commies
you get pic related

It's easy to be for free food across the world when America is paying for it all.

voting to decide the natural order of things

not how reality works

how is anything a human right? because we decided to make it so

a right is something you're willing to kill or die for
anything else is a letter to Santa Claus

I am entitled to your labor

it is MY RIGHT

I didn't know every person on earth was a tax collector

Circumcision is even worse. So yeah, they are pretty evil.

So there is absolutely nothing wrong in any country besides the US and Israel?
lmao
I mean pajeets eat shit and chinks eat dogs and cats, so I guess that's their right.

a right is something you're willing to kill or die for

not only willing, but actually able to do

Eat Shit, chang.
If I have food in my pantry that I've worked and paid for, and you're starving, it's my fucking choice if I share my food with you.
You do not have a "right" to what I fucking worked and paid for, you disingenuous shitbag.
Have some herbs to go with your stupid fucking thread.

Cannibals eat humans, it's their right

America

You spelled zionism wrong.

Leaked audio: AIPAC leader details control over Trump natsec team

youtube.com/watch?v=pHo7hyEczg0

Why should food be a right? Wouldn't there be more of an incentive to produce food if it had value?

an african country didn't vote

hahaha

No they aren't.
Food shouldn't be a right and you are an absolute moron if you think it should be.
A period of famine hits, you have enough food for just yourself over the winter. A group of people come up to you, with no food and demand by right to be fed. Congratulations, everyone is fed for a day and everyone then starves.

Fuck right off, commie.

America has a Chabad rabbi's birthday designated as a national day since 1978. It's not like AIPAC which is still a political lobby, this is straight up cult. Chabad is denounced even by Jews because of the cult thing.

Goods are not a right fuck giving the authorities more control

All I see is 2 countries in red. What 3 countries?

food is a right

In other words:

taxation to feed others is a duty

Sounds like slavery to me. If somebody else wants food they can fucking work for it.

Yeah but how can you have the right to food ? Unless someone is banning you from having food that would make sense

Anyway fuck the Jew N

no one who works at the united nations knows or has a respectable vision of what a right is.

Massive cope

I think it's actually about whether food trade must be allowed between countries, not about whether it must be free. Obviously Israel wants to starve their enemies to death and suffer no penalties. Nobody is saying Israel must feed them, but they actively block other countries from feeding them.

"Ayo gibs me dat!"

This is how.

Yeah they went to all those african cannibal countries and took a census

and god did not out food in your mouth. he gave you hands and feet to get food. you have the right to pursue food. not the right to have it.

We decided otherwise then stay mad fag

based

Than why isn't Israel and Australia against it?

the gender confused faggot thinks rights are social constructs

im so surprised

And who will provide the world with all this free food?

AMERICA IS A 47% WHITE NATION
IT'S A MAJORITY NON-WHITE NATION

IT WILL COLLAPSE LIKE THE USSR XD

This is just one of many example in which we are right and everybody else is wrong. Guns being another, more famous example.

So we only vote that way out of a desire to starve Palestinians to death? Seems kinda malicious.

Who's "right" will it be to provide food for 3 billion sub-humans in African and India who cannot or will not make any effort to provide it for themselves?
Who gets to be the middleman responsible for feeding all these parasitic orcs at the expense of the producers?

Joking about Alaska.

Sorry ladyboys, we outlawed slavery in the USA. Try joining the civilized world next time.

That sounds retarded. So, if you have a famine you still have to keep selling your food abroad?
Seems like fake and gay news.

I work hard to buy my food. It would be a shame to feed useless people with it.

So, if you have a famine you still have to keep selling your food abroad?

Isn't that what happened in Ireland? And yes, that is exactly how it works. Farmers sell for the best price they can get, and the whole market works that way. Doesn't matter at all who ends up with it. You pay more you get it.

I knew I shouldnt have taken that seriously but did anyways.

Yes and they never shut up about it. The same with India. There is no way they voted for a richer nation to buy up all your food and you can't stop it during a shortage. Are Micks and Jeets really this retarded?

US feeds a lot of useless people.
I don't understand why we would be against it, except to fuck over Palestinians.

The idea that one's pursuit of their own needs justifies depriving others of theirs is false.

Rights are not conditional on individual efforts or circumstances.

Even if an individual starves, it doesn’t mean that the human right to food no longer exists.

Have you noticed how many preppers and stockpile threads appeared lately? They want to know where the last resort food is.

Amerigolems are the ultimate form of shabbos goyim

Aka slavery to parasites. Food is already a right, you have a right to acquire and make your own food and a right to feed yourself. You dont have a right to force someone else to do it for nothing.

The existence of food to be a right? It is. What the fuck does that even mean? Like tranny rights, everyone has the same rights, because it's a negative concept, e.g. anything that isn't a wrong, is a right, and a wrong is anything that hurts (steals) from another person.

garretthardinsociety.org/articles/art_limited_world_limited_rights.html

There is no right to food on a severely overpopulated planet.

What the actual fuck is wrong with these people?
Image makes absolutely zero sense, zogolems voted against this with the greatest ally. And the only ones who abstained are the ones getting fed in that image. It's in the interest of the world to not have starving citizens and that's why basically everyone else voted for sanity.

Go fuck a kangaroo chink.

chabad

Weren't the New York tunnel jews chabad?

Nothing brings closer the mutt golem and its Jewish master when it comes to being psychopaths.

There is no right to food on a severely overpopulated planet

The world can easily sustain all of these humans though. And I am sure a starving person would rather eat lentils and bugs than be forced to die. You can also use them to grow more food

99% of the world has no philosophy

they say "nice sounding things"

shysters introduce le epic "it's ok for people to have food" motion

the worlds most important morons vote yes to virtue signal

motion passes inadvertently causing cascade economic and legal consequences that coincidentaly benefit the people who presented the motion

if i mismanage my country such that a famine occurs you are morally and legally obligated to give us food for free.

If the world wants our Big Macs they must buy them fair and square. No freebies

So, if you have a famine you still have to keep selling your food abroad?

That's what Bongs made the Irish do

we have literally solved huger in america (we solved it too hard in fact). we dont need fat fucks claiming even more food stamps because of some gay semantic thing about them having some "right" to continue stuffing themselves.

Rights are something you are born with that cannot be given or taken away. You are not born with a "right" to be fed - food is given to you (as a privilege, or a trade), or you work to obtain your own food. Privileges can be taken away, trades can be negotiated, and growing your own food means you own it so you can do with it as you please.

What this UN vote is really saying is "everyone should be fed, so everyone that makes food should be forced to give that food to everyone else". That is, quite literally, communist bullshit. The US (and Israel, amusingly enough) are rightfully saying in response: "Fuck you. Grow your own food, or pay us for our food."

You don't "deserve" food just for existing. You don't "deserve" anything at all - you make it yourself, or you trade for it, or you kill the guy who has it and take it for yourself. "Rights" are made-up nonsense. As Andrew Wilson describes them, they are "entitlements absent duties" - anyone demanding the "right" to something is no better than a nigger saying "gimmiesdat", and should be treated accordingly - being told to "go be a nigger somewhere else".

dumb migger cuck

look how many amerigolems come here to defend the right of israel to starve millions of palestinians. you are such good goys, give yourself a treat!

*taps the sign*

lol

the right to starve millions of Palestinians

That's not their "right" to do that, that's what they ARE doing. That's not the same thing. No one has a "right" to do anything, they simply choose to accept it or not. The strong do what they will, the weak endure what they must.

That's not an endorsement of Israel's actions; fuck Israel. That's a critique of Palestine - Palestine doesn't have a right to live there any more than Israel has a right to live there - if Palestine doesn't like what the jews are doing, they should fight back and kill them. If they do not, then they get what they deserve, which is merely what they allow, which is starvation. Fight back, or don't - there are no "rights", no entitlements without duties, that's just something that losers say when they're getting their shit pushed in.

Again, I must reiterate: this is not an endorsement of Israel or its actions. I condemn, in the strongest possible terms, Israel, kikes, the Talmud, Palestinians, Arabs, ALL of them. The optimal outcome would be that they all self-destruct and leave the middle east a barren, depopulated wasteland. But I'm not going to sit here and pretend like the Palestinians should be favored just because they're getting bullied - you punch the bully back, or you continue getting stuffed into lockers. You don't get the treatment you deserve, you get the treatment you allow.

t. nigger who hasn't moved beyond the law of the jungle

Based Chad

lmao not my problem

Huh? I only see one.

If food is a right I can just demand the government gives it to me. That is bullshit, US is right for voting against this. You have the right to buy food. Or grow it.

no retard, that's not what a right means. it means that nobody can forbid you from buying or growing your food. do you understand the difference? can you think of any government who is forbidding people access to food?

Wrong. White Christian who understands the context of the Bible verse "turn the other cheek" - that doesn't mean to permit yourself to be oppressed, that means to force your oppressor to stand against you on equal terms. In Christ's time, a backhand slap was reserved for women and slaves, it was a grievous insult when done to a man. "Turning the other cheek" means presenting your other cheek to the guy who backhanded you, i.e. daring him to slap you with the forehand and thus recognize you as a man and a peer, and if he does it you kick his ass because he just attacked a peer. What Palestine should do here is turn the other cheek - stand up for themselves and *demand* Israel treat them with respect. They wouldn't, of course, because kikes, but then Palestine would be totally justified in pushing their shit in (and getting the rest of the Arab world to join in, because again, fuck kikes). Currently they're just getting bitch slapped, and they're taking it, because they're a bitch.

Niggers don't have exclusive rights to violence. There IS such a thing as justified, righteous violence. You should know that, Pedro - you guys had 400 years of Reconquista to learn from.

making a good or service a right

if food is a right the we should make farmers slaves because if they refuse to work then they are denying us our right to their food?

See, that's what you don't get, Paco: people CAN forbid you from buying or growing your own food. Happens all the time, it's happening right now in Gaza. If people CAN forbid you from doing that, then your "right" doesn't mean shit. "Rights" are made-up, fictional, bullshit, doesn't matter, not real. No one has a "right" to anything - if someone can take it from you, then it isn't a right.

no offense man, but if you don't understand the concept of law and why you can't just go and kill another person on your way to the store just because you feel like it, there is no point talking to you. you are too stupid to have a discussion with.

Post gumballs video

If it requires someone else's labor, it's not a right.

Yeah it’s a Zionist shit hole full of low IQ citizens who think they are the smartest people on earth. We were always the bad guys I fear.

Yup. It's been this way since late 1800's.

With all the money spent to make this voting session happen, could've certainly made food a right for me for the rest of my life atleast

turn the other cheek means starve and blow up those who exist next to you

Nice head canon bro! You actively support one side with all of your resources and then you pretend they aren't trying to survive. ~330 million vs not even 2 anymore

"“Put your sword back in its place,” Jesus said to him, “for all who draw the sword will die by the sword." - Matthew 26:52

seems like you have forgotten that part too

Food can't be a right, it doesn't make sense. It can be a noblesse oblige of the state, but not a right.

When you talk about law, what you're talking about isn't "rights", you're talking about "privileges". I have the *privilege* of not getting murdered on my way to the store because there will be severe punishments to the guy that does it, enforced by other men, the "law" in this case. I do NOT, however, have the RIGHT not to get murdered - if some crazy motherfucker decides he wants to end my life, the "law" won't stop him, God won't stop him, no one but me can possibly stop him. I do not have the "right" not to be murdered, I have the ability to stop myself from being murdered by strength of arm and force of will. Life is NOT a right - it is a claim, and claims can be encroached upon, and must be defended if you want to keep them. ALL rights are merely claims, not entitlements. If you think you are "entitled" to anything, then I got some ocean front property in Arizona to sell you.

First part

Strawman. Wasn't what I argued

second part

I do NOT support Israel. The American government supports Israel. I am not the American government.

every country that said 'yeah' needs to be sterilized

voting to spend other people's money

easy for you faggots to complain about

That's what I said earlier: this UN vote is nothing more than people voting that they are entitled to someone else's property and labor. No one with any sense would agree with that if it was framed that way, which it isn't because, obviously, commies.

Prottykikes are not Christians.
Divorce is forbidden in both the old and new testaments.

If you believe yourself to be entitled to the fruits of someone else's labor, then you're the piece of shit here. Nothing that someone else has to provide can ever be considered a human right. Otherwise, what you really support (looking at you third world labor supporting libshits) is slavery.

Grow up and take care of yourself, or don't, but don't pretend your livelihood is anyone else's responsibility you lazy asshole.

So is interracial marriage, for that matter, but misunderstandings abound in mistranslated Scripture. *shrug*

Scripture says "he that does not work, neither shall he eat."

So does Marx's Communist Manifesto, interestingly enough, the distinction being that commies think forcing others into slavery counts as "work" on their end.

kek

Occasionally, the Jews that run the government do something that's technically correct.

Leaf coming in hot with the bantz, haha

What you said is nonsense and deserves no better. You're arguing that they should present themselves in an even more vulnerable position, because that way they would be "equals" and somehow this would magically spawn an iron dome of their own.

I do NOT

1) you voted for it and 2) you're defending the starvation of innocent while pretending this is what Jesus wants. Read biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew 25:31-40&version=NIV
Absolutely. They are the main reason Christians are losing numbers anyway.

Funny, that - sometimes "greed" is the morally correct action, although in this case it's every other country in the world that wants handouts that are the greedy ones, they just try to frame it as America being the greedy entity here.

I'm not giving up meat so Pajeets and Changs and Tyrones and Pablos can keep breeding like rabbits while my race's women are psyop'd into sterilizing themselves

A commodity can never be a right without slavery

You forgot something, in the same year this vote took place America contributed more than the rest of the world combined to food aid and has done so for every year since.

we

Ancaps may be pedophilic retards, but they are 100% correct when they say that anything that requires the labor of another person cannot be a right.

USA and Israel

name a more iconic duo, unironically

Not even Batman and Robin are this iconic

I never said they would magically spawn an iron dome, I said they should fight back, or else accept their fate. There are many ways to fight back that don't involve missiles or missile shields.

You voted for this

Do you understand that there is a distinction between individual and state? Do you understand that American politics is limited to one of two candidates? Do you understand that it is possible to support one candidate over another, even if the one you support is not entirely in line with your own preferences? Do you understand that, in a democratic representative form of goverment, that politics is extremely nuanced, or maybe a better word is "messy"?

I would have voted for Hitler but, unfortunately, he wasn't on the ballot. I had to go with the lesser of two evils.

You're defending the starvation of innocents

Nonsense. I'm not defending either side's actions, I'm simply stating the reality of the situation - if you don't like being oppressed, then stand up to your oppressor. Stop trying to make this like I'm somehow directly, personally responsible for the starvation of Palestinians - I'm not, and even if I were, they would also share some responsibility in letting me do it. I'm not accepting your attempted reframing of the situation in Gaza into some personal, individual moral failing on my part - Jesus didn't give a fuck about non-Israelites, what are today known as anyone who isn't a White Christian. As far as the Bible is concerned, the Gaza shit is two beasts, in human form, locking horns: not a concern for actual humans to worry about.

Amerifilth like to larp as based, right wing and eugenicist, but look at what the average american is - an obese racemixed retard.

i dont get it, is the implication that the other 600k are dead? or are they jews?

But most importantly why the fuck do both of our political parties put israel's interests at the forefront of american politics???

anyways jordan and egypt should just take it so they don't look racist. Borders are imaginary and its totally normal to have 1.5M foreigners show up in your country and you just have to give them housing and food when that happens, and learn their language if they won't learn yours, or so im told.

we have to give free food to the africans because it's EVIL not to

how are you people so fucking retarded?

literally standing back to back against the whole world to prevent niggers from eating

such heroic nations!

food is a le right

Idealistic bullshit.

racemixed

Those aren't Americans, they're citizens of the United State of America. There is a big distinction there.

I love how every American in this thread is on the same page - you want our food, buy it, or come and take it, if you can, but we ain't doing the gibsmedat bullshit.

Warms my cold, black heart a little bit.

but we ain't doing the gibsmedat bullshit.

(Unless it's israel)

That's the American government, not Americans. There's a difference (in some cases. Regrettably, not enough, but I'm not my brother's keeper).

What the fuck is this?

Right, let's ask the Saudis if they're in favor of making energy a right

If the U.S. voted to make food a right it would've likely been perceived as a vote to make free food paid for by Americans a worldwide right. We do often give to international charities, though. It's part of our culture. Consumer rights are still absoluely essential and, I think, should certainly not be in question.

A) "food as a human right" is the perfef5 recipe to turn humans into locusts.
B) fortunately, it's unenforceable
C) the fact that niggers haven't gone extinct is a damning indictment of how evil our "humanitarian" world order is.

Exactly. The world would vote for food to be a universal right, paid for 75-80% purely by Americans if modern history is any sort of indicator. Just like Americans must abide by the Paris Climate Agreement and further neuter ourselves while other nations are free to throw all their garbage into the oceans, and America's pollution goes down every year voluntarily.

The Bible says if you dont work you dont deserve to eat. They took away the land from white farmers in Rhodesia and a year later they were starving

food being human right only means that you need to feed the niggers who gonna replace you..
food is the fruit of labor .. its not a right..
you dont work for your food you starve its that simple..
even predatory animals work for their food, its called hunting

if you don't want to spend money to feed niggers you're evil

evil it is then

There are many ways to fight back that don't involve missiles or missile shields.

Feel free to enlighten the rest of the class. It seems like you have a thing for redefining words. You think they haven't tried diplomacy?

I had to go with the lesser of two evils

Ah so you have indeed voted for him and his party, concession accepted. Nobody forced you to do anything. It would have been better to sit this one out if you have felt that you weren't represented. Or maybe go third party as a protest vote. At least that way you aren't directly responsible for giving them power and supporting their every actions.

Jesus didn't give a fuck about non-Israelites

That was just his primary mission. He told the disciples to preach to other peoples and helped the Canaanite woman. Anyway the very people in question are descendants of the Israelites while you aren't no matter how much you want to larp as them. By that logic according to Jesus you aren't an actual human either
It's the first one, they lost that much of their population during this conflict and it also matches independent estimates.

both of our political parties

Faith and money for the reds, and money alone for the blue. They both like to pretend it's of crucial geopolitical importance to have a land based aircraft carrier in the region. But they fail to realize that they only need it to protect greatest ally's interests.

anyways jordan and egypt should just take it so they don't look racist

Then it means that territory is lost forever to the Arabs. Trump Gaza is not going to be your anyway, that's just a temporary thing to make your people cleanse the land

Unless someone is banning you from having food

you mean like israel and USA is doing by blocking shipments to an independent state and killing medical workers rendering aid in that state?

Lefties are disgusting hypocrites and America is right on this. Human rights produce no food or anything else for that matter. This is nothing but political grandstanding.

Lmao it's literally just Israel and its vassal state.

Enlighten the class

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter, and I'll leave it at that

Concession accepted

You obviously didn't read what I wrote. Voting for one man doesn't automatically mean I agree with everything he does, nor does it make me responsible for everything he does. Representation is rarely ever perfect, and the American government system does not in any way require candidates to behave according to the voter's will, in fact they usually act completely opposite to voter interests in many regards, but there is such a concept as "lesser of two evils", and if we impeached everyone who acted against majority interests we'd have to vote in a new candidate every single day. "Not voting" is the coward's path - I don't necessarily approve of everything Trump does, but I will proudly say that I, at least in part, kept Cameltoe Harris from fucking things up even worse.

You're not an Israelite

Disagree. There's plenty of proof that White Christians are the Israelites of the Bible, but you wouldn't be convinced even if I pointed them all out so that would be a wasted discussion. Pearls before swine and all that.

By the by, Christ helped the Canaanite woman only after He called her a dog and she accepted that rebuke with humility. There's nothing stopping humans from helping non-humans as long as they know their place - the Bible also says that the dog that bites the hand that feeds it is beaten and cast out.

exactly this. it takes labor to make food and you cannot have a right to someone else's labor
should we enslave people to work for your food while you rest?

White Christian who understands the context of the Bible verse "turn the other cheek" - that doesn't mean to permit yourself to be oppressed, that means to force your oppressor to stand against you on equal terms. In Christ's time, a backhand slap was reserved for women and slaves, it was a grievous insult when done to a man. "Turning the other cheek" means presenting your other cheek to the guy who backhanded you, i.e. daring him to slap you with the forehand and thus recognize you as a man and a peer, and if he does it you kick his ass because he just attacked a peer.

I don’t know which commentary corner of the Internet you found this interpretation, but it’s immediately BTFO by the additional examples Jesus gives immediately following it in v.40-42 of Matthew 5.

The interpretation of “turning the other cheek” cannot be cherry-picked out of the immediate context of those other verses.

And when you read those other verses, it will become pretty damned clear what turning the other cheek is supposed to mean.

Who makes the food that you are supposedly entitled to? Oh yeah, us. Nigger

200 countries voting that the US should subsidize their food

Is what that really says.

Jews won't allow anything to become a right so long as it can be monetized.

you are subsidizing israels food so there is that

make a 'right'

get ignored by chadstates

lmao

how dare you let us reap the consequences of our bad decisions?!

Where is food NOT a right?

True

Israel should burn in a nuclear strike.

. In Christ's time, a backhand slap was reserved for women and slaves, it was a grievous insult when done to a man

This is a post hoc explanation with ZERO historival evidence. And it doesn't fit the rest of the chapter
Matthew 5:38-42

“You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’ But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well. If anyone forces you to go one mile, go with them two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.

"Turn the other cheek" is an explicit rebuttal of "eye for eye, tooth for tooth"

rest of the world says "GIBS ME DAT"

US says no

omg so evil

what an idiotic thing
anybody who voted for it should be shot

who is that other tiny little country

2022

Not anymore. It's 2025 and Elon, Zuckerberg, and Bezos need a tax break

sweet id love for more of my tax money to go to feeding shitskin leeches and their goblin offspring!