Because it is a scientifically demonstrable reality, recorded and measured both in the lab, and in the field.
Evolution is the backbone of modern biology, and you are better off understanding it.
Evolution is taught in your public schools
Humans evolved from apes but not all because niggers still walk the earth.
I don't believe in the out of africa theory. convince me
it's a theory based on subjective opinion/a set of subjective opinions (inductive reasoning), based on some of the available data.
Thats cool and all, but we still don’t know the origin of life, and anybody who claims to is lying.
Real science:
”How do I design this car engine more efficient? How do I make this plane wing more aerodynamic?”
Fake science:
”hurrdurr, the universe began with a big gay bang!”
Learn the difference.
Evolution has nothing to do with the origin of life, that's what abiogenesis is for.
Watching you fumble basic distinctions like this is like watching a chimp try to decode calculus: tragic, but amusing.
If you're going to critique science, start by understanding it. Otherwise, you're just another Dunning-Kruger casualty yelling at clouds.
It’s actually not remotely demonstrable and literally zero evidence for it exists.
We have seen creatures evolve before our eyes
durrr but thats adaptation
Nigger what do you get when you have lots of small changes over a long period of time? You get BIG changes you stupid nigger ape.
people that stayed in africa were too stupid to get out, repeated for 300k years.
it all makes sense now.
Oldest Homo sapiens bones ever found shake foundations of the human story
theguardian.com
Oldest Homo sapiens fossil claim rewrites our species' history
nature.com
public schools
And yet they even don't know anything about berber people.
the how do you explain human races correlating with these theorized migration movements?
for example the australoids being all along the coast of india, papua and australia?
It’s actually not remotely demonstrable
Evolution is demonstrable, it has been repeatedly demonstrated, and there is overwhelming evidence supporting it across multiple scientific disciplines.
E. coli long-term evolution experiment
Antibiotics resistance
Chromosome 2
To name a few.
literally zero evidence for it exists.
Wrong again. The fossil record is full of transitional forms:
Tiktaalik
Archaeopteryx
Do Americans just spew shit out of their mouths without even googling first?
you sound like a biggest faggot on planet earth
Outdated map. Niggers are a separate species. We don't have a common ancestor from Africa.
you sound like a biggest faggot on planet earth
a
Hola ese, lets go pray to Jesús cabrón, o algo.
I said redpill me on out of niggerville theory anon. From my understanding the theory is based on one brown person they found in spain. If thats true its fucking retarded because that person could have been traveling, an outlier, or just not a member of the native humans of europe
The founder effect means that populations that leave their origin point are going to tend to be less genetically diverse than populations that remain. So it stands to reason that genetic diversity increases as you get closer to a species geographic origin.
Genetic diversity among native inhabitants increases as you get closer to Sub Saharan Africa.
QED.
some ancient human fossils in Asia rival or predate African ones.
high African diversity might reflect population structure, not just origin.
Interbreeding with archaic humans suggests more complex migration than simple replacement.
Whatever happened it seem like nig nogs are not fit for modern society the same way europeans and asians are
>some ancient human fossils in Asia rival or predate African ones.
I didn't say anything about fossils now, did I?
Though you're very likely mixing up Out of Africa I with Out of Africa II. Which gets to this point:
>Interbreeding with archaic humans suggests more complex migration than simple replacement.
Yes. Some early hominids migrated out of Africa before Homo Sapiens existed. Human migration patterns and their history is more complex than often portrayed and humans will fuck damn near anything.
>high African diversity might reflect population structure, not just origin
The structure of the population is heavily influenced by its origin. I'd suggest you read into the founder effect to get a more thorough understanding of the argument.
Whatever happened it seem like nig nogs are not fit for modern society the same way europeans and asians are
That may be true. But has nothing to do with Out of Africa. The first humans probably had very little in common with modern niggers anyway.
Very cool so whatever is believed as humanities origin and migration patterns its a big fat maybe and we both agree niggers aren't humans
There is no evolution, just natural selection and speciation.
Out of Africa is a debunked theory.
Very cool so whatever is believed as humanities origin and migration patterns its a big fat maybe
Out of Africa is well within the realm of "much more likely than not."
we both agree niggers aren't humans
They're just as "human" as any other group of homo Sapiens. My point is they spent just as much time diversifying and changing as any other group of humans.
Whites, Koreans, Abbos, etc. are exactly as closely related to the first humans as niggers in Africa are.
ancient-spoo
unh
macroevolution.net
900 seconds
Out of Africa is literally impossible based on DNA evidence. That's why its a debunked theory.
You are all retards that should never breed.
See The DNA is on the side of Out of Africa unless you have some groundbreaking revelation to share.
I have 6 children
Then why do only Sub Saharan Africans have the unnamed super archaic hominin DNA?
Arguments please.
If that map is right then Monteverde was made by aliens, seriously, since Gobekli Tepe was discovered a lot of history books became garbage, only chinese keep that lie for propaganda "muh first and eternal empire".
The "ghost DNA" is only present in West African populations and probably came about through interbreeding more recently than the first homo Sapiens left Africa.
Ie. People left Africa first. One group that remained and inhabited Western Africa interbreeded with archaic homos after the fact.
You keep repeating founder effect like a parrot
Counter Points:
Gene flow may dilute founder effects: If the new population isn’t fully isolated, incoming genes from other groups can quickly reduce the impact of the founder effect.
Natural selection often plays a larger role: Some argue that adaptive traits in isolated populations are better explained by natural selection rather than by the randomness of a founder event.
Difficult to distinguish from bottlenecks: Genetic bottlenecks (drastic population reductions) can cause similar genetic patterns, making it hard to separate founder effects from other demographic events.
Overemphasis in human history: Critics say it's often overused to explain genetic differences between human groups without considering migration, interbreeding, or cultural selection pressures.
Short-term effect: Over generations, mutation and selection can override the founder effect, especially if the population grows and mixes.
is only present in West African populations
No it isn't.
Its in all SS Africans at an amount from 9 to 20%.
Then race should also be taught as niggers are subspecies.
Patently false.
Where are you reading this shit from?
>Gene flow may dilute founder effects: If the new population isn’t fully isolated, incoming genes from other groups can quickly reduce the impact of the founder effect.
Yes. But it won't reverse it and make the association go the opposite direction.
>Natural selection often plays a larger role: Some argue that adaptive traits in isolated populations are better explained by natural selection rather than by the randomness of a founder event.
I'd like to know who these "some" are that are arguing this. Natural selection isn't typically going to increase genetic diversity.
>Difficult to distinguish from bottlenecks: Genetic bottlenecks (drastic population reductions) can cause similar genetic patterns, making it hard to separate founder effects from other demographic events.
Yes. But unless you can establish another source of such an alternative bottleneck, founder effect is the default.
>Overemphasis in human history: Critics say it's often overused to explain genetic differences between human groups without considering migration, interbreeding, or cultural selection pressures.
This would not explain the increased genetic diversity in Africa.
>Short-term effect: Over generations, mutation and selection can override the founder effect, especially if the population grows and mixes.
Hence why there is still a degree of genetic diversity outside of Africa.
It's the other way around, the out of Africa is pretty much the only possible theory based on DNA, you can easily check this since Europeans have intermarried with Neanderthals and Asians with some fucks I always forget the names of. Humans in subsaharan Africa do not present any evidence of mixing with these groups, meaning that they must have come earlier than the people who did intermix, some do however present some amounts of a DNA that is of an unknown origin not present in any other population.
Patently false
Nice argument.
Well yeah. What you said is simply untrue. So no further elaboration is needed. The ghost DNA is specifically a West African phenomenon.
Since I don't have the energy, I'll just leave you with a video.
youtube.com
they have calibrated the mixture with neanderthals I think to around 45k years ago or so, so it's not terribly informative if, again, we're dealing with bottlenecked populations in different ecologies, the north was dominated by super predators like neanderthals who had the advantage for a long time
one could also bring about another piece of evidence that is often overlooked, namely, that neanderthals are closer to sapiens in terms of uniparentals than their autosomes, and this is usually explained away by saying that early homo sapiens somehow managed to move north, replace neanderthal Y and mtDNA, then disappear basically until he came back later again from Africa, while if sapiens always lived closer to neanderthal dominated ecologies, it's less cumbersome to explain
Robert Sepehr
Yeah, I figured as much.
Opinion discarded.
retard can't handle actual arguments
fucktards that never invented a wheel or domesticated an animal somehow packed up and left on a world wide tour?
At least buy me dinner before you fuck me in the ass.
Tiktaalik
modern fish do the same thing this little nigger allegedly did. I say allegedly because no one ever saw one alive and don't know exactly what the fuck it did in relation to its anatomy. Same with any other fossils that make up the alleged fossil record. Imagine if the platypus was extinct and the fuckwits that have made up this grand story found it's fossil. Lol. evolution is a fairy tale for secular materialists and nothing more. It's a bunch of made up horseshit and has not at all been proven to be true much less demonstrably so.
A bacteria developing a resistance to an antibiotic is not the same thing as a bacteria turning into a completely different kind of animal you stupid cocksucker. And no, this is not a religious position, plenty of Christians I know believe in evolution, I can take the first chapter of Genesis and prove evolution. Evolution isn't true because it literally has no rock solid evidence and there won't be any. Why? Because according to the con, it takes millions of years, which no human has the time to fuckin actually observe.
You're going to have to provide one first. So far you just parrotwd a false claim from Sepehr that all SS Africans have ghost DNA which you'd know isn't true if you got your information from literally anywhere else.
Honestly just fucking Google it.
Evolution does not apply to humans, you FUCKING retard precisely because we are all out of Africa.
There is only one race, the human race.
they just haven't found wakanda right is all
Evolution is fake and gay. Out of the nigger continent is fake and gay. You are a dumbass or a shill.
Prove him wrong.
Damn you're retarded.
Show me one example, other than Sepehr, of a researcher claiming all SS Africans have ghost DNA.
So you have no source proving him wrong.
I thought so.
False. Christ the Word made flesh has spoken and He said that he made them man and woman from the beginning. Adam and Eve were real people and probably more beautiful than current top models as the first human design of God. Evolution happens to a degree but it isn't only one line to a higher species at all. Looking at how a simple cells functions disproves it in reality. Some Africans especially and Asians do look more primitive, indicating that there were numerous sub-types created at some point and/or we evolved differently similar to dogs during the ages. Life is way too complex to only be from random mutation and selection. Creationism is ipso-facto true. Evolution is a gayyyyyyy atheistic bullshit theory overall. Sasquatch dna has been found yet people will not believe in bigfoot with undeniable dna evidence (looks created by ETs editing females with another species) yet you will believe in evolution. Homo erectus looks like an Ape. Neanderthals just like a different sub-type of man.
Op - "Yes you are all descendants of niggers, therefore you must let them all in your country"
You first Kike. Go make Israel 50% black and maybe we will take you seriously.
Science is not supposed to be set in stone. As we advance we learn new things and have to change our world view. You look at the science books and journals of 50 years ago. Things have changed vastly since then.
Literally just says "erhm no" to all common counterpoints. Lmao
Your attempt at pretending you were trolling to save face is transparent as fuck.
Just admit you took some retard's YouTube video at face value without any cross examination and move on.
jewish fairy tales like the big bang and believing in their made up bullshit is how they control every fabric of your being.
Who's trolling?
I posted a claim and you can't disprove it.
post hoc explanation
you can't be serious
Literally the first result when you Google "Africa ghost DNA:"
npr.org
Was that so hard you couldn't do it yourself?
That article doesn't say anything about the DNA not being in all SS Africans. It just says it was found in West Africa.
Because that's the only place they did find it.
You're really not good at this whole "just pretend you were trolling" thing.
The burden of proof is on you to find an example of this DNA anywhere but in West African populations.
No that's where they FIRST found it.
Show me an example elsewhere then.
I already did. You rejected it for no reason.
No you didn't. Sepehr's claim is what's in question here. It's unsourced and needs verification.
You didn't actually watch the video did you?
Maybe you should do that before completely dismissing it.
I've seen enough of his material to know it's bullshit meant to convince morons who can't be bothered to cross examine him.
If his claim had any merit to it, you'd be able to find it in writing *somewhere* other than his own material.
I've seen enough of his material to know it's bullshit
That's what I thought.
Last (you) from me.
If his claim had any merit to it, you'd be able to find it in writing *somewhere* other than his own material
Kek, you can't be serious.
He's just retarded. The proof he wants is in the video he refuses to watch.
If he cites a source, then it shouldn't be too much trouble for you to just retrieve it.
Fontéchevade, a cave site in southwestern France known for the 1947 discovery of ancient human remains and tools probably dating to between 200,000 and 120,000 years ago. The fossils consist of two skull fragments.
britannica.com
Modern human originated in Europe most likely
Why do zoomers post youtube videos as a "source"? How lazy are you?
The problem with evolution is that every unsolved link in the chain is instantly explained by <insert time gap over which it happened, but we have no evidence>. Furthermore, they ignore the evolutionary differences between the various races too and they leave out everything that isn't politically correct.
Wrong. Sneed.