Does anyone else see a problem here?

Does anyone else see a problem here?

911.jpg - 805x813, 91.73K

What's the problem?

Kike physics

Kike money magic

Same shit

yeah, thats not where you park airplanes, they need to go to the airport

They were caught dancing

half the plane phased through the building

Yeah, building

7

Low resolution, grainy video footage will not perfectly capture something moving at 450 mph. Shocking i know

Not really. That’s all glass and hollow air

What do you expect to happen when a giant missile going 600 MPH strikes a building? For it to bounce off the side like it's a tennis ball? Lmao

Nope.

how does a commercial jet reach speeds of 550kts in the dense air near sea level? the plane would break apart midair

it just slides in like butter because of early 2000s photoshop tech then the bb18's planted by mosad go off and make it look like an explosion, dont question it goy

U WONT DOOO SHEEEIIITT

Yeah I see a problem. Yet another 1BPTID meme flag OP thread. All fields.

Our Greatest Ally? No way! It was obviously the illuminati reptiles from the planet Skyron, not God's Chosen Tribe!

Vertical runways were a mistake

The speed is secondary - what determines the physical limits of the Boeing 767 is Mach number and dynamic pressure.

510 kts at 400 m in standard atmospheric conditions equals Mach 0.775. This is well within the limits of the Boeing 767. But at 400 m it produces a dynamic pressure of 40,567 N/m2, and that is too much. The maximum dive speed vD
of the 767 is 420 kts.

This only means that flying at 510 kts is illegal, but it is still possible. If the airplane dove down to those 400m from enough altitude, it would entirely be capable to reach this speed, but would slow down once it stops diving.

There are several effects which can cause a catastrophic failure when flying too fast:

When the aircraft flies into a gust, the resulting load factor can overstress the structure.
When the pilot commands large control inputs, he will also overstress the structure.
Flutter might also cause structural damage.
The maximum Mach number of the 767 is 0.91 (0.05 above the maximum cruise Mach number, which is 0.86), and this corresponds to 523 kts in 11,000 m. Thankfully, certification requirements demand a margin of 20% between the maximum speeds and flutter onset speeds, so flutter might be close, but is still tens of miles per hour away when diving to 510 kts. Remember, to experience flutter you need also to excite the motion first. Here is a good discussion of this topic.

In short, flying a Boeing 767 in 400 m at 510 kts is not recommended, but is entirely possible and most likely even safe when done in calm air and by a calm pilot. It only won't last long, because the engines will not produce enough thrust to maintain that speed. Flying this dive requires guts, but no special skills.

Found the jew

Yeah.
terrorists hijacked 4 jets and attacked the US.

problem

yes trolling outside Anon Babble

patrol.jpg - 500x1200, 92.36K

kikes did 9/11

problem here

Yes the memeflag OP

fuck off memeflagget

relatively flimsy and lightweight wings

versus steel beams

the damn wings should have stripped right off and mostly fallen to the ground, retard. these jets weren't the jets that took off under those flight numbers.

yeah the problem is there were no planes on 9/11 they landed them all, murdered the people onboard after making a few of them make some fake phone calls and then they blew up 4 buildings

It’s a UFO.

massive object crashes into glass at 300mph

Remember the greatest fire fighter hero to ever exist, Orio Palmer! He made it to the 78th floor of the South tower where the "plane" crashed through. Then they pulled the building down with him and his team.

I wonder whats it like being in the head of the people to take down those two towers for insurance money and for creating the middle east war. To think that they were orgasmic killing all those people just to get a war in the middle east. And they made sure to make money off the towers' destruction, too.

That is the epitome of evil incarnate.

I am gonna fucking rip all your clothes off, rappe you violently up the ass, no lube and then KILL YOU

Even Jones is saying jews did it

makes me remember the ufo fake videos

they popped up a few years prior to the no-plane fakes

911 is so fascinating to me, most importantly because of the scale. It tickles my autism juuust right

it was the biggest jewish magic trick ever pulled off. and it worked

I don't know. Read the old testament and figure it out.

Yesh it's called CGI.

Go learn about velocity and get back to us. Tornados can punch tree branches into concrete.

how fast would a plane have to be going to completely disappear, like at the pentagon?

no

kikes pulled the whole thing off in reality

thats how much they despise you

Looks like a plane hitting a building

Thanks chat gpt: can a 75 ft tubular section of 5/8" aircraft grade aluminum at 500mph penetrate a perpendicular 2" thick construction grade steel column?

Please base your answers on the known ANSI tensile strengths of both products at the specified velocity.

Ya theres grey smoke above the building as the plane is flying into it...

Are you guys retarded?

no, nobody. you are on your own chud.

A Boeing 767 is a 140 tons object.
I guess a 140 tons projectile traveling at 500mph dig an hole in steel grid while disintegrating into it.

source on the quote? i think you are either kike or uninformed posting

"disappearing planes" is a well poisoning narrative. its impossible for a plane crashing into that steel structure to make it implode. its physically impossible. its also impossible that the fire in building 7 caused its steel structure to implode.

its

No shit. Nano thermite, dews, 100% government insider job... they're all distractions. The truth is actually "hidden in plain sight" to borrow from OG 9/11 conspiracies, but no one will accept it because of what we've been taught.

Everything is a lie, but nuclear testing has been almost entirely underground for the past 50 years. What have they learned?

What are you trying to say? Spell it out after watching the entirety of the following video. I just don't understand what you are getting at.

youtu.be/7hApRZ_7v2A

I doubt an event like this could be done again with all the cameras we have today.

Nope, just business as usual.

yeah they have to go back to doing gulf of tonkin style events where nobody but their grunts are around to witness things

Does anyone else see a problem here?

No

When large aircraft crash it looks like they are melting into the ground.
youtube.com/watch?v=UG85NYN659I

Does anyone else see a problem here?

memeflag

1pbtid

2 problems

tower.jpg - 422x710, 87.5K

Did that b52 cut through 2" thick steel and leave a loony toons hole somewhere ? All I see is in that vid a fireball and some parts flying off.

The spooks haven't answered any actual questions yet itt. They want us to be angry and blame some particular group because it's an outlet but the actual truth is worse:

They're not in control. We don't know who really is, anymore than them. They get one story with some truths, and we get a bunch of theories to choose from but st at the very least, we can all (glowniggers and non retards combined) agree that the official narrative is bullshit. 100% nonsense. A dozen sandniggers with box cutters didn't destroy 3 skyscrapers.

Or what about when the government used HAARP to divert a hurricane away from NYC the evening of September 10th, 2001.

IMG_9070.jpg - 673x342, 50.93K

If a hurricane was coming toward New York, that almost feels like divine intervention to stop the kikes from pulling it off. Makes me believe in God even more than I already did.

God

So that’s what we’re calling HAARP now? Weather modification has been a thing since the 1950’s if not earlier.

Fun fact: for the captchas the letter ‘o’ and the number ‘0’ are interchangeable. Same with ‘s’ and ‘5’; and ‘z’ and ‘2’

9/11 videos are all AI generated as fuck.

its impossible for a plane crashing into that steel structure to make it implode. its physically impossible.

Cool because it collapsed from the compromised section of the structure down instead of imploding, as shown in all videos.

its also impossible that the fire in building 7 caused its steel structure to implode.

Cool, because building 7 was compromised by debris and was missing several stories of one of its corners. it collapsed unevenly from the center out, as seen in all videos.

Your mother is a 140 ton object but I don't disintegrate when she bounces on my dick at 500mph.

If you control the media it's easy

Just shit CGI planes

Yeah that's exactly what happens when one corner of a square structure is compromised. Goddamn debris.

I'd like to think Anon Babble was brought back to identity subversived, but if also except some legit arguments to draw them out. There's nothing though, just the same midwit talking pointsm no actual arguments.

WTF are you cunts looking for? Are your all really this stupid that you haven't questioned what you've been told?

Don't answer; that's rhetorical. I don't view you as an enemy. I just think you haven't bothered to think some stuff through is all.
Take a moment and think logically about what you've been told.