Is higher math inherently jewish Anon Babble?

3/3.

ITT: retards (don't) learn about the concept of a limit

0.000...0001 = 0

He's probably one of yours. Jews larping as goys who hate jews make up a good proportion of what goes on on the internet and this low energy bait is the perfect example of the sort of soft agitation that gets past a left wing jewish committee.

kek

My discrete math class spent like 50 minutes going over proofs as to why 0.999..... = 1.
I still don't believe it.

It is, but you just can't prove it. You can pretty much take it as an axiom.

I am so dumb that I can't understand basic mathematical concepts but idgaf soo I'm a le chad or something

because it's obvious gaslighting to make people believe something is true out of necessity not our of truth because there is none

If that were true then 0.999... would be the same as 1, which clearly is false. Contradiction

It isn't though.
If it was 1, it would be 1.
Instead it's 0.999... which is not 1.

it obviously is, since 1/3*3 = 1

Fractions aren't whole numbers though, they're abstract representations.

Kikes want you to believe in schizo faggotry like "infinity"

Kikes get mad when you mention that 0.(9) + 0.(0)1 = 1

Kill all globohomo faggots.

Prove it, kike.

It's equal to 1 in the sense that our math is imprecise enough so that it ends up correct, if we could nail reality down to the smallest possible unit then it would be wrong

Please Discuss On Social Media

Mmmm.... no.

1/3 * 3 = 0.333.. * 3 = 0.999..
1/3 * 3 = 3/3 = 1
therefore 0.999.. = 1

Hey man, I will write down the proof on the exam and receive an A because I’m a straight A student.
That being said, I still don’t believe it.

1/3 * 3 = 0.333.. * 3

Prove it, kike.

0.(0)1 = 0

Prove it, kike.

but you just can't prove it

Isn't there a literal proof that 1/3 * 3 equals 1?

That makes no sense. If you know the correct answer, why do persist in ignorance?

we already did. it's called planck length.

You know what guys? this is bullshit, but not for reasons anyone says.
"..." is not a mathematical operator, and has no definite meaning.
Thus, any proof that uses it is necessarily bunkum.

However, there are defined ways to write it as a limit, and that works fine

/3 * 3 = 0.333.. * 3

Prove it, kike.

1/3 = 0.333..
substitute: 0.333.. * 3 = 1
QED

.(0)1 = 0

Prove it, kike.

0.(0)1 = 1 - 0.999..
since we already proven that 0.999.. = 1:
0.(0)1 = 1 - 1 = 0
QED

"Real numbers" are fake, unlike "Imaginary numbers" (which do exist in real life)

How is it the fault of Jews that you chuds can't grasp basic proofs? It's the limit of an infinite series. Didn't you ever take a course in fundamentals of mathematics?

1/3 = 0.(3)

Prove it, kike.

since we already proven

You didn't prove shit, you just made your kike statement, filthy kike.
Prove that 0.(0)1 = 0.

.999 repeating doesn’t exist. Prove it does lol. It’s equals 1 of but don’t you think that means it doesn’t even exist. You can’t prove 3/3 is .9999999

I know it's hard for an American to grasp.
But just because something is 0.999...% white does not make it white.

/3 = 0.(3)

Prove it, kike.

x = 0.(3)
10x = 3.(3)
10x - x = 3.(3) - 0.(3)
9x = 3
x = 3/9
x = 1/3
QED

Hahaha

1/3 =/= .333...
you giga retard nigger
die

Yes it does faggio. Tf?

This. Thanks fren

1/3*3 = 1/9

argument from personal incredulity

I guess you're prob not capable of grasping that either. baka

You're using fractions. Decimal notation and fractions don't play well together when infinity is involved. There is a reason why all proofs of 0.999... = 1 use fractions: because without fractions, it's not possible to prove that 0.999... = 1. Then you may tell me that fractions and decimal notation are just two ways of representing the same thing. In that case, there must be a proof that doesn't use fractions, as they're interchangeable. No such proof exists, hence, fractions and decimal notation aren't fully compatible, and one can't be used to prove the other.

0.999.. = 1 is the axiomatic thing because if we don't assume that things break. That is it.

"..." is not a mathematical operator, and has no definite meaning.

The ellipsis is understood to mean a continuation of a pattern beyond the existing terms. Formally, in the context of "0.999..." it is understood to mean precisely:

10x = 3.(3)

LMAO, prove it, kike.
And prove that 0.(0)1 = 0.

this is the same guy who tells you that trump tariffs are paid by china

x=0.999...
10x=9.999...
10x=9+x
9x=9
x=1
QED

It’s not a limit if its equal to one you cockgobbler

that's just the definition of multiplication. didn't they teach you how to multiply in the US before being stationed in Germany?

Why does pol make college level math seem like it's so profound or difficult, or something?

without fractions, it's not possible to prove that 0.999... = 1

well idk much about math but

x = 0.999...

10x = 9.999...

9x = 9

x = 1

no fractions seems like solid proof to me

DEI maths are different level and are the new law in the US. You wouldn't understand.

If not, then what's the difference?

Bri'ish 'yuman'

The last contribution your countrymen made to the technical fields was Newton, so lower your tone when speaking to me, bong. Also, deboonk my claim. I'm not blowing smoke, there's solid mathematics to prove my point.

This is how atheists argue against God.

college level

Pfffft

0.999.. = 1 is the axiomatic thing because if we don't assume that things break. That is it

tldr we let us gaslight out of necessity

Kike faggot is broken

LMAO, like I said, kike faggots that want you to believe in their faggotry like infinity break and get mad when yopu mantion 0.(0)1
Drink bleach, fag kike

the degeneracy always starts at the basics. if you can get gaslighted into believing that .999...=1 is true then you also can get gaslighted into thinking trans women are women

9.999... - 0.999... = 9 This part already assumes that 0.999 = 1 you dumb fuck.
Proving a hypothesis using hypothesis, genius.

Limits are allowed to equal the value they tend to lol. Didn't you learn the definition of continuity in Calculus 1?

Ted thought so

no it just assumes that 0.999... = 0.999...
but you're right that it does work out the same way as 0.999... = 1
that's because it's a proof of that equivalence

x= 1-1+1-1...
-x=-1+1-1+1...
x+(-x) = 0 + 0+... = 0
x-1 = -1+1-1+1...
x-1=-x
x=1/2
0=1/2

Dude this was ten years ago and I just did what I was told in class to get the best score. Can you show me how it’s a limit from the right and the left side???

lolol so true. the midwittery never ends. it's like they get caught in every intellectual sandtrap one can. 105-120 IQ really is the worst thing you can have. It should probably be considered a disability

No it doesn't you churka
Please study math a bit harder or so you don't fuck up my change when I get shawarma

0.(9) x 9 = 8.(9)1

0.9999... = 1

This confirms my statement that maths is Jewish mysticism because it explains coin clipping.

1 - 000001 = 1 coin
99.999999 = 1 coin
No matter how much gold you steal from the goyim coin, it's still a coin and still legal tender.

Only a kike could come up with such an invention. Fractions are Jewish.

Ooooo

Mathemagicks is nothing more than Jewish schizophrenia.

Keep it in terms of x, no need to multiply.

1-1+1+1....
Is a series and can't be treated like that

Keep it in terms of x

So that you could more easily play your kike tricks, dirty kike? No, thanks.

This is pillpul in abstract alphanumerics. It's just Jewish bullshit. Check if your wallet is still in your pocket. Were you wearing a watch before you typed that out? Check if it's still there.

Fractions are Jewish

Nah fractions were playthings of the Greeks first and they came up with some pretty neat stuff with them.
Anyone of sound mind will recognise that 0.000...1 is infinitesimal and write it off as close enough to zero to be considered nil in calculations. Only a Jew would think 'but its larger than zero, if we siphon off enough of these - we can make a mint!'

human math

lmfao
AI will kick our ass in two years and call is retarded shit-eating monkeyfaggots

Conceptually? Infinitely small. A tantalus pursuit to become a whole number but it's always lower than 1

In practical terms? No one cares, real world and engineering tolerates negligible error margins anyway

debunked

faggot

0.0000001 isn't 0, nil, nul or nothing. Then again, 0 isn't real either.

Show me what negative 15 elephants looks like. Oh you can't? Fuck off then. Literally everything that exists consists of a real number, i.e. positive integer.

Show me what irrational apples looks like. Not apples called Karen. Irrational numbers are not real.

0 isn't real

How many good jews are there?

AI will kick our ass in two years

t. never uses AI for math or programming

Show me what negative 15 elephants looks like

It's 15 elephant shaped dotted lines silhouettes

Show me what negative 15 elephants looks like

you put up a border that you declare a zero and walk 15 elephants over the border. simple as

Fake news. This is just an assertion that has no basis in reality. The assertion is circular as well.

it's true because we set up a formal abstract system in which we say it is true.

It has utility in terms of applying it to physical systems in situations that are not required to have accuracy to arbitrary decimal points. That's all. The process can never be completed. The universe is digital/discrete/informational/virtual and computed. Infinity can't be computed, and that infinite processes is not comfortable or real in either a physical OR abstract way.

None. That is different to 0.

So you need 15 real elephants (positive integer) and then walk them backwards over a real line (1) (another positive integer) to a fixed point that exists (1) (another positive integer)?

Show me what your negative post looks like.

X=.999....
Therefore 9x=9×0.999...

Show me what negative 15 elephants looks like

I can show you what a negative one globohomo kike looks like.

oi mate, it literally is, it's like the definition you dumb bong, and there is really nothing to discuss about that if you have taken at least some kind of basic calculus 101 course, literally the litmus test for mathy persons: this shit is just not interesting if you can actually into math

you shouldn't, see here
It's fake news. Continuousness/analogicity are fake news.

None. That is different to 0.

Sounds like the usual semantics argument jews love to use to avoid giving straightforward answers.

negative one globohomo kike

A dead something doesn't make it negative.

9 x 0.(9) = 8.(9)1

Rolling for India to be nuked.

you put up a border that you declare a zero and walk 15 elephants over the border. simple as

Are you joking? Math is made up. It can explain some things but people literally made it up.

Are you guys dumb or acting like one?
0.999... – 0.999... can't be handled in decimal notation without assuming these numbers have some kind of finite replacement, in this case, 1. You would need to perform infinitely many subtractions to arrive at zero. That’s where limits come in, bringing us back to fractions.

0.999.. = 1 isn't provable.

Only if it's forgotten. Heidegger argues that something that has been forgotten never was in the first place, because nothing that truly is can be ever forgotten.

Apart from the most elementary mathematics, like arithmetic or high school algebra, the symbols, formulas and words of mathematics have no meaning at all. The entire structure of pure mathematics is a monstrous swindle, simply a game, a prank. You may well ask, "are there no renegades to reveal the truth?" Yes, of course. But the facts are so incredible that no one takes them seriously. So the secret is in no danger.

Ted Kaczynski said this many years ago now,
and it is 100% true.
It's one of those things you try to explain to normal people,
and they can't comprehend how it could be true,
so they think you are crazy.
This is, of course, no real secret at all amongst people who study mathematics.
Calculus was invented with concepts like infinitely small numbers,
which as this thread shows,
people still believe in what Bishop Berkley called the "ghosts of departed quantities."
It would take a very, very long time for calculus to be reinvented
in a way that most people would agree made sense.
We still use artifacts from that era of mathematics though,
treating dy/dx as if it signified anything meaningful at all.
Most mathematical proofs are completely fraudulent.
The "proof" of Fermat's Last Theorem,
is based on nothing but the same sort of mathematical gibberish,
used to say that the sum of the natural numbers
is equal to -1/12.
It relies on demonstrably false arguments over infinite terms,
something which Cauchy called the "generality of algebra."
Just like calculus had to be reinvented because it relied on illogical concepts,
mathematicians routinely re-invent areas of mathematics,
and pass them off as new research and mathematical techniques.
What we today learn as vector calculus,
was literally stolen from the quaternions of Hamilton,
by two mathematicians named Gibbs and Heavyside.
Literally the exact same stuff,
with different names and symbols.
The symbols also keep changing throughout time,
usually for no good reason.
See Florian Cajori's work.

No, I will explain clearly.

How many unicorns are in your kitchen?

0

No, 0 isn't real.

there aren't any unicorns in my kitchen

This is a real answer. It's quite a subtle distinction.

What is 15 bananas minus 21 bananas?

-6 bananas

No, because bananas are real objects that you count in positive integers that are made up of atoms which are numbered in positive integers. You cannot have a negative banana, such a thing does not exist.

there would be no bananas

Exactly, you would stop taking bananas after the last one (the 15th one, which is a positive integer).

Noting ever happens muttbro. They will open gates in 3 months max and make more treaties.

asked a question

changes and rewords the question

answers the new changed question

pilpul

here

and that infinite processes is not comfortable or real in either a physical OR abstract way.

should be

and that infinite processes is not completable, confirmable or real in either a physical OR abstract way. "real numbers" are fake.

What is a concept anyway?

We are keeping it in terms of x, we are not multiplying

Infinitely many subtractions

x-x=0 regardless of value of x

0.999...=1 isn't proveable

Yes it is and I just did it above

sum of all natural numbers is -1/12

Watch less popsci channels

Try this: draw right triangle with base and height each of length 1 cm (or meters, whatever makes you happy). Now measure the hypotenuse, go into as much precision as you humanly can - then tell me there are only positive integers at play in the natural world. Oh and 'negatives' are just a direction, I think it was Euler who lamented that we ended up calling them negative numbers rather than directed numbers. Think of left/right or up/down on a number line/plane. This is all very elementary and I'm sure you're trolling, but I've already waited out the captcha so why not, have a (you).

9 x 0.(9) = 8.(9)1

this sounds right
9x9 = 81
81 + 8,1 + 0,81 = 89,91

nooo I never claimed it being true it's just a concept!

way to move the goalpost faggots

What? It sounds like you're too conditioned to think clearly. If you're confused about 0 I will try again to explain.

There are not 0 giraffes in your living room.
There aren't any giraffes in your living room.

You can't point at 0 atoms. You can't hear 0 noise. 0 is Jewish mysticism.

You can observe a lack of atoms. You can think or say you can't hear anything.

They are subtly different things.

geg the same reason they have ridges in the coins. So kikes couldn't scrape gold from coin sides.

End result is 8.999..., but jt doesn't matter for the same of proof, since it's kept in terms of x

Jews do accounting, not math.
Math is for wipipo.

0.999... isn't 1 though.

It isn't though.

It is though

Alright you faggots here is your proper proof:

We know that the finite series
S_n = 0.9 + 0.09 + 0.009 + ... + (9 / 10^n) = (geometric series)
= 0.9 * (1 - (0.1)^n) / (1 - 0.1) = 1 - (0.1)^n

0.999... = lim_{n ∞} S_n = lim_{n ∞} 1 - (0.1)^n = 1 - 0 = 1
=> 0.999... = 1
qed