i have no cuarrel agaisnt you but i asked anyway for the lols:
"Objectively, a 4x4 vehicle is far superior for offroading compared to a horse, especially when it comes to covering difficult, steep, rocky, or muddy terrain consistently and carrying heavy loads over long distances.
Horses are biologically adapted for some types of rough terrain (mountain trails, dense forests, shallow rivers), but they are limited by fatigue, injury risk (especially leg injuries on uneven ground), weather conditions, and the need for food, water, and rest. In contrast, a properly maintained 4x4 can operate for hours or even days at a time provided you have fuel and can deal with mechanical issues. Modern 4x4s (like Land Cruisers, Jeeps, Unimogs) have locking differentials, winches, offroad tires, and traction control systems that allow them to deal with mud, sand, snow, and rocky climbs that would completely exhaust or injure a horse.
Situational advantage: In extremely dense woods or very narrow trails, a horse might navigate slightly better, because it's smaller and more flexible. Also, if you're somewhere with zero infrastructure, where carrying fuel is impossible (weeks deep in wilderness), a horse could survive by grazing, giving it autonomy a vehicle doesn’t have. But that’s a niche case.
Real-world precedent: Modern armies, explorers, and rescue teams in rugged environments almost universally use 4x4s, ATVs, or helicopters. Horses are only used for patrols in very specific terrains where engines would choke (e.g., certain mountainous forests)."