Genuinely why are Fags Like This?

This is why you lolbergs always lose, and how you end up with troons raping children at drag queen story time.
You are an accomplise and bear nearly as much guilt as the sodomites themselves.

i think most gay people don't like the degenerate pride stuff

Use this webm if you want.

But that’s a legit creepy photo though.

You're actinting like l dont oppose all this shit dude.
l'm not saying l support fags, l'm saying if fags actively were different then they manifestly are l'd spend less time giving a shit about their degeneracy.
They're not though.

So any sex that doesn't result in reproduction is immoral? Does this mean you can't fuck your wife if she's post-menopausal?

I understood your point, and I am making the Burkean point that not opposing evil when it is not directly in your face is how we get the disgusting clown world we have now.

but what if most gay people also get the ICK looking at an image of some degenerate shit in front of a kid, if they're just living a quiet existence or even in the closet is it still wrong

Didn't stop Abraham from having kids.
lf God wants you to you will.
Well we're well fucking past that dude.
And l'm well past the stage where l'm down to break out the flame throwers.
Does the debate about whether or not the neighbor boy went bad for good after he stole the candy off the store shelf at 6 or at the point he stole the calf at 16 really matter after he's raped the pastors daughter and we all agree he needs to be lynched now??

lmao

A. I don't believe that is the case for a second.
B. If it were, it would not remain that way for long.
C. Even if it were and it would remain that way, I don't care. Evil needs to be stamped out wherever it rears its ugly head.

i think most nazi people don't like the degenerate anti Semitic stuff

after he's raped the pastors daughter and we all agree he needs to be lynched now??

I'm not sure what you think my position is. I'm saying it needs to be stamped out whether they keep it hidden or not.

Government shouldn't have a say in marriage, especially when now it's mainly used as incentive for tax breaks.
Get rid of them and marriage will drop precipitously.

l dont think we have a real disagreement in values dude.

Lmao. No.

Two male characters who are friends are stuck in the same house because they don't have anywhere else to go.

"OMG THEY MUST BE GAY! FAG PRIDE!!!!111!1!"

I hate faggots so much.

Yeah, why not. I don’t care what people do in private. It’s when they flaunt and boast about their degeneracy.

i have enough faith in humanity to say most gays don't like that shit either because it's just hardwired into our brains same with liberals, if you showed them a pic of some degenerate pedo shit most people in the west would have a moral objection to it. and if they're not doing anything pedophilic then it's basically just a fetish like fucking fat women or feet stuff

Didn't stop Abraham from having kids.

Okay same can be said about gays then if you're going to appeal to a miracle. That's a self defeating argument

Where in the bible did God give Faggots a baby?

Ernie and Bert are gay

Citation fucking needed

I'm saying that "homo-normative" relationships that mirror heterosexual relationships were pretty much universally accepted. Still, the takeover of "queer" ideology that seeks to disrupt the concept of nuclear family and champion every form of fetishistic degeneracy including bestiality and pedophilia removed almost all of the good will that took so very long to build.

that description sounds very similar to the peepshow too.

Okay so it's not about pride it's something about faggotry itself. What is it?

You said God decides if you have a baby, even if it's a physical impossibility. I guess that means any kind of fucking is a-okay in theory as long as god gives you a miracle baby.

Is it immoral to fuck your wife with a condom?
Is it immoral to have sex if barren or sterile?
Is it immoral to pull out?
Is it immoral to have hetero oral or anal sex?
Is it immoral to have non-penetrative hetero sex (massaging, rubbing, mutual masturbation, etc)

and champion every form of fetishistic degeneracy

How many straight people do you think have odd or abnormal fetishes? How is a blow job pro nuclear family? Or piss play? or BDSM? or slapping, choking, etc.? Or hetero anal sex? Or cum shots?

Fake ball globe propaganda bottom left

So if we stopped being the extreme pedo faggots that everyone said we were you wouldn't have a problem with us?!

if you are surprised by this then I support withdrawing all of your rights

So if gay pride parades didn't exist you'd be pro gay marriage?

No, I'm pro throw the sodomites into the volcano because it's funny.
But if they hid themselves away in shame to do their dirty works and were shunned as the degenerates they are, I'd be less likely to care enough to join a lynch mob.

I always thought they were brothers.

puppy girl

Post feet or you will never be a woman

We

I'm not gay

Should we outlaw straight marriage because straight people sometimes engage in strange and disturbing sex acts?

So gayness isn't immoral? You're just edgy?

actually just this.

Considering your flag, I'd guess it's far more likely that you just have a vested interest in defending sodomism.
But, taking you at your word, your assumption is a complete non sequitur. You assume their brains will have the same disgust reaction despite them engaging in acts that register in the same part of the brain as seeing a dirty toilet seat for neurotypical people. Their brains are already broken irreparable in one area. No reason to assume it is not broken in a related area.

how tf gay marriage is even real? it's fucking disgusting

Every single demographic has this issue, like all Whites being seen as incel/school shooter/bigot(?) because of the actions of a few or all Muslims being terrorists or all Blacks being thugs or all Jews being zionist etc. And now all gays are pedo flamingos because of this pride thing that gets so much media attention. Where is the empathy every single demographic has this happening and yet everyone participates in it

genuinely

This board is irredeemable.
Should've stayed dead. Genuinely.

OP, this might be difficult for you to understand. But people are individuals and they aren't wholly represented by their stereotypes.

Okay so it's not about pride it's something about faggotry itself. What is it?

The behavior. It's evil and disordered.
Beyond that, they rape children and spread horrific diseases.

Yes, dumbass. That's how the fags got gay marriage in the first place. They kept their fag parades in San Fran until they could trick America into letting them marry. It wasn't until then they went full mask off with their pedo agenda. How old are you that you don't remember this?

Pride flag is a Jewish religious symbol and the flag of Jewish Autonomous Oblast in Russia
Pride is also a sin.
Gay marriage is a sin in the Bible.

Exactly. It reeks of jewishness.

Is it immoral to fuck your wife with a condom?

Yes

Is it immoral to have sex if barren or sterile?

No

Is it immoral to pull out?

Yes

Is it immoral to have hetero oral or anal sex?

Yes

Is it immoral to have non-penetrative hetero sex (massaging, rubbing, mutual masturbation, etc)

To completion? Yes.

How is a blow job pro nuclear family?

strawman
The nuclear family is about monogamous, life-long relationships and raising your children -- parental rights and things like that. It's this that queer wants to destroy.

This is what the pope wanted

Post feet or you will never be a woman

He'll never be a woman, regardless.

aids

Before the mass push of free porn by jews, this was very rare. In fact even to this day I know tons of people who do not have pornographic mindsets and they look at the rest of us like disgusting freaks who should never have children.

All the kids who were fucking and sucking in highschool ended up on drugs and divorced.

how tf gay marriage is even real?

It's not.

No lie is too small for them to tell.

What part of throw the sodomite degenerates into a volcano states that I don't consider their ways immoral?
If anything, you might infer that I'm lazy and edgy, but not that I don't believe the sinners should be punished.
Tired of these ESL fucking scrubs israel is hiring to stir shit here lately. Go be brown somewhere else, fag.

some jokester posted an image of 4 guys in a vertical daisy chain piledriving each others asses at a gay parade and it's stuck in my head forever
can't blame god for torching those cities and deleting everything with the flood

Should we outlaw straight marriage because straight people sometimes engage in strange and disturbing sex acts?

This is a particularly retarded non sequitur.

If fags actually kept their fag shit inside their own houses I literally couldn't care less about them

I'm sorry I do have vested interest unfortunately, it's something I struggle with I get a massive knot in my gut thinking about if it's true and they're all like that and they'd all defend it. It's not like I interact with them or query them on this but I just have to believe if you showed them a pic of this degenerate TRASH 9/10 of them would be like That's fucking disgusting. And not just the blatant pedophilia but the rancid public displays in general.

How is it immoral and evil. If there were two gay guys left on planet earth and they just had gay consensual adult sex how is that evil?

So can I make straight marriage illegal because some straight people do perverse shit?

So if straight people are going to partake in that should we not let them marry? Should you have to sign a paper saying you will only every have reproductive sex. Also, why are those things immoral?

life-long relationships and raising your children -- parental rights and things like that.

So can a monogamous life long gay marriage not accomplish that?

Okay so it's not a gay or straight thing. It's a "what's your kink thing". BTW why is any of that immoral if consensual? How is it any more immoral than giving your wife an erotic massage that doesn't end in reproduction?

Y...you're a kike

Nigger.

How is it a non sequitur. You seem to think the only sex allowed in marriage is reproductive. If gay sex disqualifies you from marriage so too should condom sex or blow jobs.

Y E S

Okay so you're okay with gay marriage being legal then.

Y...you're a kike

Nigger.

Holy SHIT ESL is off the charts. I said you were brown, likely a jeet hired by kikes, you fucking bobblehead.
You're a brown slave of kikes, not a kike, fag. You're obviously just too stupid to be part of the small hat tribe.

Im only anti sodomy. Some are anti rianbow flags spammed on products.

Some just dont want gay marriage.

Some dont like pride parades.

Some hate those 4.

Why?
A normal person would be disgusted by sticking his face or penis in an unusual. Having that much contact feces would make a normal person wretch.
They apparently have no problem with that at all. Their disgust reaction is clearly broken.

2010: We just want equal rights and to get married

2024: We will force hormones on your children and cut off their genitals. If you try to stop us we'll have you arrested.

When they ask why we had to go back, this is why.

Or two and a half men

Brown people like fags? Seems to me like gay marriage is a mostly white phenomenon.

I thought they were brothers when I was a kid, then I figured they were young guys, possibly NEETs, who can’t afford their own apartments in NYC so they share one. They sleep in separate beds and can barely stand each other.

White leftwingers want it. White leftwingers are just closet bisexuals.

greece and thailand

I think they vigorously clean before doing that like douching and stuff because scat fetish is so rare, right? ....... butt pr0n shows it looking pretty clean

That was the consensus that led to this whole mess to begin with...

Who do you reckon the top is? Bert or Ernie?

You said God decides if you have a baby, even if it's a physical impossibility. I guess that means any kind of fucking is a-okay in theory

No not at all.
Not when God explicitly said he is not okay with something you dishonest fucking hack.
You not liking a position doesn't make it incoherent and until you admit my position isn't incoherent and you just dishonestly attempted to claim it was l dont se why l should answer any other fucking question you have.
God liked Abrham so he gave him a baby when it was possible.
God doesn't like Faggots (and has said as much in the bible) so it is impossible
Do.
You.
Follow.
The.
Logic.
Or.
Not?

God liked Abrham so he gave him a baby when it was possible.

So God won't be giving random barren/sterile people babies. Should they be allowed to marry? Should people with vasectomies or tied tubes be allowed to marry?

and has said as much in the bible

How do you know the Bible is true?

God made them sterile as a punishment for something, they should be burned at the stake just to be safe

He literally said weed and alcohol is immoral too because muh wasted time not reproducing even though the Bible literally says to do these things. He's a retard larping as a boomer.

So God won't be giving random barren/sterile people babies

No if God he likes them he will.
God doesn't like faggots so its not going to happen for them and has said so multiple times.
What the fuck is so hard to understand??
How do you know you aren't a brain in a vat?
There is no prove anything.
As such the wish to have proof is irrational.
You choose to believe based on what you experience.
My experiences have led me to have the beliefs l do today.

Poop is gross as boogers and farts.

Is it immoral to fuck your wife with a condom?

Is it immoral to have sex if barren or sterile?

Is it immoral to pull out?

Is it immoral to have hetero oral or anal sex?

Is it immoral to have non-penetrative hetero sex (massaging, rubbing, mutual masturbation, etc)

Yes.

*No if God likes them he will.
God doesn't like faggots so its not going to happen for them and as God has said so multiple times.
What the fuck is so hard to understand??
*How do you know you aren't a brain in a vat?
There is no way to prove anything.
As such the wish to have proof is irrational.
You choose to believe based on what you experience.
My experiences have led me to have the beliefs l do today.

How is it immoral and evil.

It's disordered. As I already explained.

So if straight people are going to partake in that should we not let them marry?

Pre-crime is not a thing. You're stretching so hard because you know how dumb what you're saying is.

Should you have to sign a paper saying you will only every have reproductive sex.

Do you have to sign a paper saying you won't run your car into a Christmas market when getting your driver's license? No? Because that would be retarded? That's what I thought.
But if it makes you feel smug about your retarded redictio, then sure. Include that in the marriage license application. Lmao.

Also, why are those things immoral?

They are disordered.

How is it a non sequitur. You seem to think the only sex allowed in marriage is reproductive. If gay sex disqualifies you from marriage so too should condom sex or blow jobs.

Sodomy does not disqualify you from marriage. Milo Yianopolis can go marry any of age woman who isn't already related by blood or already married. Lmao. Pretending not to see how retarded and sophistic your non sequitur just makes you look dumb and dishonest.

So did we ever figure out how all those children and dogs got monkeypox?

Everyone in this thread fails the tldr check

Wtf are you watching faggot porn?

everyone has a disorder now, people are licking feet or masturbating to My Little Pony or fetishizing Sarah from TLOU. the Internet has spawned a legion of degenerates the amount of truly normal people are dying off especially true for demographics like you'll see on Anon Babble

Because they think being a homosexual is natural when it isn't so they get caught up in making justifications for it. There is no way that you can have this form of sexuality being normal without the other pride homosexuality coming with it.

So God won't be giving random barren/sterile people babies.

Lmao. Happens all the time.

Should they be allowed to marry?

Sure. See above.

Should people with vasectomies or tied tubes be allowed to marry?

Neither of those abominations should be legal.

Can't argue with that

Many such cases

So basically:
Non-reproductive sex is always a sin
UNLESS god magically steps in and gives you a baby even though you had the sex knowing you weren't going to have a baby.

Q: If I have anal piss sex with a woman and god makes her magically pregnant does that mean it wasn't immoral?

How do you know you aren't a brain in a vat?

I don't. But I'm not ascribing any morality based on if we are or aren't.

As such the wish to have proof is irrational.

BY that logic so is your belief in God and any moral prescriptions you make based on it

God said so

You are making a truth claim you said yourself is irrational to believe in because you can't prove it. Everything you said can be disregarded since you claim everything you say is irrational.

I wanted to make that point without looking too sus but I didn't know how to, I'm guessing most people have seen some butt porn by now and I'm assuming it's mostly clean

Even straight men who have sex with other men can get it.

Oh. So because a lot (or even most) individuals are engaged in evil we should just allow sodomites to rape children and spread monkeypox?
"Everyone's speeding. Guess we need to make murder legal!"

Okay so what is it about gay sex that makes it immoral if you think straight anal sex is okay?

Really? Proof? Can you show me where a post-menopausal woman has a baby? Not a woman who has had trouble conceiving and then finally has a baby after getting creampied the 6 gorillionth time.

If an 80 year old muslim woman has a baby does that mean God is smiling upon Islam? If two straight people who want a baby can't conceive does that mean God doesn't condone their marriage and it should be annulled?

How is it immoral and evil. If there were two gay guys left on planet earth and they just had gay consensual adult sex how is that evil?

Cause it’s gay

So can I make straight marriage illegal because some straight people do perverse shit?

No but at least they’re not gay

So if straight people are going to partake in that should we not let them marry? Should you have to sign a paper saying you will only ever have reproductive sex. Also, why are those things immoral?

Because they aren’t gay

So can a monogamous life long gay marriage not accomplish that?

It’s gay

How is it any more immoral than giving your wife an erotic massage that doesn't end in reproduction?

Because it’s not gay

How is this hard for you to understand? Being grossed out by gay shit is way more normal than the forced tolerance fags like you stomach and try to preach to us like it’s not gross

youre gay

if gays kept it in the closet no one would know they exist retard

no of course not, but if they're just fucking other dudes and not fucking kids it's probably still a disorder but most of the planet has one now

You win.

Same with straights who like blowjobs. You should be just as grossed out at a guy who goes "I love getting my dick sucked" as a gay dude.

pedophilia is still illegal retard. Lots of pedos are straight. Also, straight sex can spread STDs too. Maybe just ban all sex, it seems like that's what you're arguing for.

Non-reproductive sex is always a sin

UNLESS god magically steps in and gives you a baby even though you had the sex knowing you weren't going to have a baby.

Yeah, cause thats not non-reproductive.
And as your wife could always potentially be blessed as Abrhams wife and John the baptist's mom were in the bible its never a sin because we have precedent for such shit happening in the bible.

If I have anal piss sex with a woman and god makes her magically pregnant does that mean it wasn't immoral?

Where is anal sex allowed in the Bible?

I don't. But I'm not ascribing any morality based on if we are or aren't.

Clearly you are if you think the world is real enough to even have moral debates in or care about anything.
Like it or not you have unfounded assumptions you base your morality on as well.
The unverifyable belief that the world exists is the basis for your anti-nihilism.

BY that logic so is your belief in God and any moral prescriptions you make based on it

How so?

You are making a truth claim you said yourself is irrational to believe in because you can't prove it. Everything you said can be disregarded since you claim everything you say is irrational.

l'm making an universal critique of reality.
At the end of the day we just choose what we choose to believe and believe it.
My values are no less founded then yours and l have just as much basis to se them adhered to as you do; that's my argument.

So if gay pride parades didn't exist you'd be pro gay marriage?

no, but i would be more likely to believe the assertion in the OP's image. you nigger faggot.

Okay so what is it about gay sex that makes it immoral if you think straight anal sex is okay?

Why are you lying? I have said the exact opposite repeatedly. Demonstrating that you sodomites are pathological liars is not helping your case that you're not innately immoral.

Really? Proof? Can you show me where a post-menopausal woman has a baby? Not a woman who has had trouble conceiving and then finally has a baby after getting creampied the 6 gorillionth time.

So, more sophistry. How do you propose we would bar the infertile from marrying without some means of determining they are infertile? Oh, you don't have an answer? Then the entire thought experiment is gay and retarded. Women diagnosed as infertile conceive all the time. As such there is zero reason to bar women based on a factor that is misdiagnosed as often as not.

If an 80 year old muslim woman has a baby does that mean God is smiling upon Islam?

Lmao. Of course not.

If two straight people who want a baby can't conceive does that mean God doesn't condone their marriage

Lmao. Of course not.

and it should be annulled?

Infertility has been grounds for annulment for all of recorded history. It certainly wouldn't necessitate an annulment but would be grounds for one.

Looks interesting. Is that Cirque du soleil?

Further more can l just ask why do you give a fuck?
Some people think you being a faggot is immoral, other people think you eating pork is immoral, why do you care dude??

but if they're just fucking other dudes and not fucking kids

There's virtually no evidence this happens and mountains of evidence it doesn't.

it's probably still a disorder but most of the planet has one now

Again, I fail to see how this is remotely relevant.

So if I intend to have non-reproductive sex it's not a sin if god magically puts a baby in the woman's womb? I thought sins can occur in the mind? Does the intent not matter?

Where is anal sex allowed in the Bible?

Where is non reproductive sex allowed in the Bible?

Clearly you are if you think the world is real enough to even have moral debates in or care about anything.

Where does my morality hinge on being a brain in a vat or not?

Like it or not you have unfounded assumptions you base your morality on as well.

Like?

The unverifyable belief that the world exists is the basis for your anti-nihilism.

I can't possibly know the world exists. But I'm not ascribing any morality based on if it does or doesn't. You are making a moral claim that gay sex is immoral. Why?

How so?

You claim asking for proof is irrational because it's impossible to know. So you just stating "God is real" is just as irrational and as a result so are any moral proscriptions you make based on your belief of God.

At the end of the day we just choose what we choose to believe and believe it.

Sounds like you believe in subjective reality then. So why are you appealing to a God you don't even believe. Just say "Gay bad because I said so" it makes way more sense and is way more sound than appealing to a god.

pedophilia is still illegal retard.

Not if you had your way, sodomite. It was asked earlier, you failed to answer. How did those kids and dogs get monkeypox?

Lots of pedos are straight.

Blatant lie.

Also, straight sex can spread STDs too. >Maybe just ban all sex, it seems like that's what you're arguing for.

Lmao. Look at how hard the sodomite is seething over being told he can't rape dogs and children. "IF I CAN'T RAPE CHILDREN NO ONE CAN HAVE SEX!" This is why functioning societies stone you freaks or throw you off buildings.

What is immoral about anal sex?

How do you propose we would bar the infertile from marrying without some means of determining they are infertile

By testing them and annulling any marriages once we find out they are infertile or barren. If two people KNOW they cannot have kids should they be allowed to get married? For instance if a man is sterile. Or the woman had a disease and had to have her womb removed.

Of course not.

Why not? Are you telling me muslims and Jews don't have miracle births when they were thought to be barren?

Of course not.

Why not? If the point of marriage is reproduction and God gives people miracle babies for being married it sounds like he hates people who can't have babies.

It certainly wouldn't necessitate an annulment but would be grounds for one.

And if they have sex without an annulemnt knowing they're infertile is that immoral?

Where is non reproductive sex allowed in the Bible?

You’re just a load that your mother should’ve swallowed

Why is eating pork immoral?

Not if you had your way sodemite.

Incorrect I'm in favor of it being illegal

How did those kids and dogs get monkeypox?

Probably through sex. Are you saying straight people never have been perverted pedos or had sex with animals?

Blatant lie.

Not a blatant lie at all

Look at how hard the sodomite is seething over being told he can't rape dogs and children.

I'm straight and personally find gay sex gross. But I don't see how it's immoral. If two gay people want to get married and fuck each other not my problem. Or if they want to have kinky sex outside of marriage not my problem as long as it's consensual.

Swallowing sperm = a sin apparently

Why is being gay morally permissible?

I will never be pro fag anything ever again. Because you faggots are malicious. I hate you.

So if I intend to have non-reproductive sex it's not a sin if god magically puts a baby in the woman's womb? I thought sins can occur in the mind? Does the intent not matter?

Sure.
lf your consciously rejecting God's commandments yes that's a sin.

Where is non reproductive sex allowed in the Bible?

lt's not.

Where does my morality hinge on being a brain in a vat or not?

ln the fact that you ascribe any value at all to any moral system to speak of.
lf you are a brain in a vat everything is meaningless.

I can't possibly know the world exists. But I'm not ascribing any morality based on if it does or doesn't.

Yes you are if you say anything that """happens""" in this world is immoral you are basing your belief on an unfounded hypothesis.

You are making a moral claim that gay sex is immoral. Why?

Because all propositions are equally epistimologically justified (which is to say not at all) and l choose to.

You claim asking for proof is irrational because it's impossible to know. So you just stating "God is real" is just as irrational and as a result so are any moral proscriptions you make based on your belief of God.

Yep.
Which is why belief system is just as justified as yours.
Because to prove anything or know anything so to say to one thing is to say something of equal truth as saying the opposite in all cases.
1/2

because presumably it's between two consenting adults, there isn't any reason for it to not be moral

2/2

>Sounds like you believe in subjective reality then. So why are you appealing to a God you don't even believe.

Oh no l believe in him
l just dont think there is any reason TO believe in him.
Just as their is no reason to believe in anything from standards of skepticism.
You might say that means l have no justification for what l believe but it also means you have no justification for what you belieie.
so in the absence you get to pick to believe whatever you want
Reality? God? "Gender Essentialism"? its all just as real as anything you articulate
And we got there with the same retarded fucking skepticism you people used to tear down the natural world.
We can just as eas>Sounds like you believe in subjective reality then. So why are you appealing to a God you don't even believe.
Oh no l believe in him
l just dont think there is any reason TO believe in him.
Just as their is no reason to believe in anything from standards of skepticism.
You might say that means l have no justification for what l believe but it also means you have no justification for what you belieie.
so in the absence you get to pick to believe whatever you want
Reality? God? "Gender Essentialism"? its all just as real as anything you articulate
And we got there with the same retarded fucking skepticism you people used to tear down the natural world.
We can just as easily use it to tear down your retarded faggot morality.
What's "good"?
What's "bad"?
Who cares!
What's that fucking mean anway.
lf its not immoral for faggots to fuck each other up the ass theres no reason its immoral to kill faggots either!
We're all just evolved apes anyway right??
Why are you so desperate to claim we are any better then the apes you insist we are?
l feel like you fags should be gassed.
We live in a materialist univers right?
l dont have free will right???
WELL THEN LOOKS LlKE l DONT NEED A FUCKlNG REASON DO l FAGGOT!!?!?

So your presupposition for permissible sexual act is two conditions.
1) Being an adult
2) Consent
So you don't object to things like incest, necrophilia et cetera et cetera?

What is immoral about anal sex?

For the fifth time, it is disordered. You monkeypox riddled degenerate.

If two people KNOW they cannot have kids should they be allowed to get married?

As was already established, this is not a thing. If you tried reading any of the responses in this thread instead of raping children and dogs you'd embarass yourself a lot less.

Why not? Are you telling me muslims and Jews don't have miracle births when they were thought to be barren?

You realize that approving of something someone has done is not an endorsement of everything they do, right? You probably got a "good job" sticker for something you did as a kid. That was not saying everything you do (such as now raping dogs and giving them monkeypox) is a good job. In the same way infidels may be blessed for any number of reasons which are not their lack of belief. You are clinically retarded.

Why not? If the point of marriage is reproduction and God gives people miracle babies for being married it sounds like he hates people who can't have babies.

If it does sound that way to you (which it may, you are clinically retard, but you're also a serial liar) it is only because you are very dumb. You are pretending to believe that any reward a person receives is an endorsement of all of their behavior always and forever. And any misfortune that befalls someone is a punishment for all of their behavior always and forever. No one is dumb enough to believe this. Not even you.

And if they have sex without an annulemnt knowing they're infertile is that immoral?

knowing

Again, something that is literally not possible.

*

Sounds like you believe in subjective reality then. So why are you appealing to a God you don't even believe.

Oh no l believe in him
l just dont think there is any reason TO believe in him.
Just as their is no reason to believe in anything from standards of skepticism.
You might say that means l have no justification for what l believe but it also means you have no justification for what you belieie.
so in the absence you get to pick to believe whatever you want
Reality? God? "Gender Essentialism"? its all just as real as anything you articulate
And we got there with the same retarded fucking skepticism you people used to tear down the natural world.
We can just as easily use it to tear down your retarded faggot morality.
What's "good"?
What's "bad"?
Who cares!
What's that fucking mean anway.
lf its not immoral for faggots to fuck each other up the ass theres no reason its immoral to kill faggots either!
We're all just evolved apes anyway right??
Why are you so desperate to claim we are any better then the apes you insist we are?
l feel like you fags should be gassed.
We live in a materialist univers right?
l dont have free will right???
WELL THEN LOOKS LlKE l DONT NEED A FUCKlNG REASON DO l FAGGOT!!?!?

I have enough faith in humanity

Oh no, it's retarded.jpeg

oy vey goyim everyndemographic has this issue blah blah blah [gaslighting jew noises intensify]

Marriage is between a man and a woman. Everything else is jewish nonsense.

Incorrect I'm in favor of it being illegal

Are you saying straight people never have been perverted pedos or had sex with animals?

Yes. Literally by definition.

Not a blatant lie at all

As with the vast majority of statements you have made itt, it is.

I'm straight and personally find gay sex gross.

Why bother lying?

But I don't see how it's immoral.

You clearly do.

If two gay people want to get married and fuck each other not my problem. Or if they want to have kinky sex outside of marriage not my problem as long as it's consensual.

Yeah, see believing in consent based morality is really the biggest giveaway possible that you're lying about being a sodomite.

Being gay is amoral until somebody can prove to me it's immoral. Same with straight sex.

lf your consciously rejecting God's commandments yes that's a sin.

So every married couple having post menopausal sex or a woman having sex after she has to get her uterus removed for cancer = evil sinner?

lt's not.

So basically people should only fuck their wives a handful of times?

ln the fact that you ascribe any value at all to any moral system to speak of.

I don't ascribe any objective morality independent of human experience. But you do. I never said being gay is moral. I just said it's not immoral. Why do you think it's immoral?

lf you are a brain in a vat everything is meaningless.

That could very well be the case. I don't make any claim to objective morality. I don't see how morality would exist if no humans existed. How is there a universal law of something being immoral without humans?

Yes you are if you say anything that """happens""" in this world is immoral you are basing your belief on an unfounded hypothesis.

I'm not making an objective claim. I never said being gay was moral. I'm asking you to prove to me it's immoral. If you want to say being gay is icky to me. But when you invoke God then obviously you need to prove God to me first.

Because all propositions are equally epistimologically justified (which is to say not at all) and l choose to.

Okay then you're just as irrational as somebody who says rape and murder is bad. So why evoke God? Just say: Gay bad because ew.

Which is why belief system is just as justified as yours.

It's not. I don't appeal to God to say being gay is not immoral. You appeal to god to say it's immoral. I say gayness is neither immoral or moral in a subjective or objective sense. It's no more moral than it is for a wave to crash or a tree to grow. You are making them claim it's immoral. Then appealing to God. Then saying belief in God is irrational anyway. Then saying all beliefs are equally justified.

well I just feel like it's disingenuous, obviously fucking family or a corpse is different. there isn't really any big difference between fucking a woman or a man it's just a preference, I could use that logic to say fucking a fat chick is immoral or fucking someone with a lazy eye is immoral or whatever you want

because his jewish masters and a jewish rabbi in a priests coat told him it was true.

/thread

gawd

there isn't really any big difference between fucking a woman or a man it's just a preference

So men and women are interchangeable? No differences at all?

flag

Oh... you actually do believe that. Welp, that explains a lot.

but it also means you have no justification for what you belieie.

In terms of gay sex I'm not ascribing any morality to it. You are. I'm asking why.

Reality? God? "Gender Essentialism"? its all just as real as anything you articulate

I can't ultimately prove my computer exists. But I can touch it and show it to you. We can exist in a shared reality with it, even if we're both in a vat. But you can't prove or show me in any way god exists.

What's "good"?

What's "bad"?

There's no provable objective morality. I'm not sure how you could go about proving it. You can argue things are subjectively moral based on different standards though. But I'm not arguing faggotry is moral. I'm saying it's amoral.

l dont have free will right???

How do you have free will if God exists? Didn't he create all things knowing how they will turn out before they even existed? Are you telling me you could change God's eternal plan that existed before time and space even did?

Ruh roh, what's disingenuous I'm using your standard and applying it.
If it's morally objectionable because it's "just different" it's fair for me to say putting your dick in a vagina versus a mans asshole is just different, one is okay the other is not.
You either bite the bullet or you admit you're being arbitrary and being incoherent when you apply your standards.

Professor Screweyes' Eccentric Circus?

Yeah but I'm playing the skeptic game since all you want to do is be on the offensive, either something is permissible or it's not, so can you answer the question as to whether you think fucking corpses or your adult brother is permissible or not.
When I say permissible I'm asking for your prescriptions you'd apply in your own society for cases such as I have listed.

Being gay is amoral until somebody can prove to me it's immoral.

So you were willing to destroy tens of thousands of years of civilization over something you can't even defend as acceptable much less good?
Holy shit, you're dumber than I thought.

For the fifth time, it is disordered

Is oral sex immoral? If two no STD people do enemeas and clean and have anal sex how is that immoral by your cleanliness standard? What if a woman's pussy is diseased?

As was already established, this is not a thing.

You're telling me a woman with a removed uterus or born with a fucked up womb can have a baby?

You realize that approving of something someone has done is not an endorsement of everything they do, right

Or maybe it's not God blessing them and they just happen to have a baby despite not being very fertile

Again, something that is literally not possible.

Yes it is. Can a woman with no uterus give birth?

why do fags

they reproduce by touching children anon, they have to bring their degeneracy into the public or they cease to exist

The best gays are the ones nobody knows are gay. They are just a dude who does his job and hobbies, hangs out with his boyfriend the way two ordinary best friends would hang out, talks in a normal voice and not that retarded shrill gay voice, falmboyant dress is fine but not the gay shit with the ass cheeks sticking out.

Also by saying something is amoral you're applying a subjective standard as to what you apply morality to so what is it, if you're asking whether a sexual act can be immoral I'd ask the question what is wrong with pedophilia? If it's the case that it would be immoral then you have a standard for when sex is morally permissible or not so don't hide behind amorality.

So every married couple having post menopausal sex or a woman having sex after she has to get her uterus removed for cancer = evil sinner?

No, because in the bible it says you can do that,
you fucking reptitive dumb peice of shit.

So basically people should only fuck their wives a handful of times?

No.

I don't ascribe any objective morality independent of human experience. But you do. I never said being gay is moral. I just said it's not immoral. Why do you think it's immoral?

Because its not more or less justified then thinking its moral or amoral.

That could very well be the case. I don't make any claim to objective morality. I don't see how morality would exist if no humans existed.

lf you believe it exists in any form you are claiming it is objective in a sense.

I'm not making an objective claim. I never said being gay was moral. I'm asking you to prove to me it's immoral.

And l'm saying that just the same as saying its moral or ammoral.
lf we're gona get into the world of justifications we quickly find all justifications are impossible.
There is no way the articulate any meaning or its absence which is not incoherent so to say one is to say the other and nothing can be communicated in that space on any topic.

Okay then you're just as irrational as somebody who says rape and murder is bad. So why evoke God? Just say: Gay bad because ew.

Because l dont think it is because of ew l think it is because of God.
l just dont need anymore reason to believe that then anyone needs to believe anything else.
And since no one has any reason to believe anything but belief is just as justifed as theirs.

It's not.

lt is.
For the reason l just laid out.
The concept of "amoral" itself cannot be destinquished from "moral" or "immoral" as such the values are equal.

Marriage is between a man and a woman

Source: The Torah

So a man having sex with a little girl or a female goat is not straight? Okay then a fag having sex with a little boy or male goat is not gay.

As with the vast majority of statements you have made itt, it is.

Except it isn't. The history of child marriage will prove you wrong.

Why bother lying?

I'm not.

You clearly do.

I don't.

Yeah, see believing in consent based morality is really the biggest giveaway possible that you're lying about being a sodomite.

How? If I come and take 5 dollars from you I'm stealing. If I take it and you say it's okay then I'm not stealing.

Whats that elephant thing? Looks cool

In terms of gay sex I'm not ascribing any morality to it. You are. I'm asking why.

And l'm saying that no one has any answer for that question for anything.
So when i tell you for no reason it is the same as yours.

I can't ultimately prove my computer exists. But I can touch it and show it to you. We can exist in a shared reality with it, even if we're both in a vat. But you can't prove or show me in any way god exists.

Who is this "you" you are talking about??

There's no provable objective morality.

And yet you are sure it doesn't fall into the catagory lol.

How do you have free will if God exists? Didn't he create all things knowing how they will turn out before they even existed? Are you telling me you could change God's eternal plan that existed before time and space even did?

That is a question genuinely to complicated to get into this late, but spark notes is string theory, single consciousness theory ect.

Is oral sex immoral? If two no STD people do enemeas and clean and have anal sex how is that immoral by your cleanliness standard? What if a woman's pussy is diseased?

You realize how retarded and dishonest asking the same questions I have answered multiple times makes you look, right?

You're telling me a woman with a removed uterus

No

or born with a fucked up womb can have a baby?

Happens all the time.

Or maybe it's not God blessing them and they just happen to have a baby despite not being very fertile

And? I haven't mentioned God once itt other than direct quotes from you. You're bolstering my point here.

Yes it is. Can a woman with no uterus give birth?

No

probably

they're not "interchangeable" but most people you interact with in daily life is men and women there isn't really any reason why loving a man would cause a moral dilemma assuming they aren't fucking a kid or their partner isn't their brother or something, it's not different than loving a woman it's just a preference

I think you're the one being arbitrary, I'd have more respect if you just "bit the bullet" and admit you don't like it because a book or whoever told you what to think

Gay marriage is bullshit, the fags are promiscuous no matter what.

I would argue amoral things are permissible. I can scratch my arm right now. Is that moral or immoral?

so can you answer the question as to whether you think fucking corpses or your adult brother is permissible or not.

As to a corpse I would say no unless they entered into a contract saying please desecrate my corpse. The reason being I don't want my corpse to be fucked and most people don't.

As for the two brothers if it's consnensual sure. It might be disgusting to me but I don't see who it's hurting. The only argument I could see against it is power dyamics but you could argue that for basically any relationship

So a man having sex with a little girl or a female goat is not straight?

Correct

Okay then a fag having sex with a little boy or male goat is not gay

Cool. I haven't used the word "gay" once. Not sure what you think you're proving.
It is sodomy though.

Except it isn't. The history of child marriage will prove you wrong.

It is.

Why bother lying?

You are.

I don't.

You do.

How? If I come and take 5 dollars from you I'm stealing. If I take it and you say it's okay then I'm not stealing.

And you apply this standard to all moral issues? Fraud is ok because the retiree gave the Nigerian prince scammed her money with consent?
More relevant to the conversation, you view incest as moral? Necrophilia?
I was correct in stating that you are in favor of child molestation and bestiality? Why do you lie earlier and say you opposed those things if you are saying they are moral here as a result of your consent based morality?
Sodomites are not sending their best.

No

I'm not religious and I have standards I can reference from yes books like Freud, Aristotle and the list goes on.
You're being arbitrary because you refuse to apply your standard to all the particular cases it fits, you're in a performative contradiction if you refuse to.
With sexual morality you can either pick
1. Primitive (No standards to sexual morality except for being an adult and consent)
2. Aim inhibition (Assuming these aims are going to be whatever you subjectively find as a preferable practice for ideal demographic, for example a heterosexual population even if there is no birth rate demand you always have the necessary people to be able to fulfill that duty but on the complete contrary this wouldn't be the case and be exceptionally difficult to reverse devoted sexual degens to heterosexuality)
3. Telos, function, purpose. (The sexual organs have a purpose and should only be used for that purpose, benefits can be avoiding biological pitfalls like a sexually degenerate population that can't tap into higher mental faculties they abuse their dopamine system.
For evidence look at patients that receive L Dopa or sex addicts and look at the consequences.)
I personally choose 3 but can defend 2 if needed, yes that means I'm also not arbitrary and apply the standard to infertile people.

it's not different than loving a woman it's just a preference

If they're not interchangeable then by definition it is different.

their partner isn't their brother or something

Now you're contradicting yourself. If you want to arbitrarily place limits on which partners are acceptable and which are not, fine. But then you have no defense against those of us who choose to draw the line at same sex couples.

So you were willing to destroy tens of thousands of years of civilization over something you can't even defend as acceptable much less good?

What?

Pedophilia is wrong because children can't reasonably consent and it's coercive in nature. Is it OBJECTIVELY immoral. No, not in a way anybody could ever prove. But in a subjective way where you want to maximize wellbeing then yes it's immoral.

No, because in the bible it says you can do that,

So you agree you can have non reproductive sex. SHow me a single case of a woman with no uterus having a baby.

No.

You just told me only reproductive sex is okay. So you fuck until you're wife is pregnant then stop then only fuck to have another baby. etc.

Because its not more or less justified then thinking its moral or amoral.

That's not true. Is it moral to lick the roof of your mouth right now?

lf you believe it exists in any form you are claiming it is objective in a sense.

No I'm not. I don't think any of our moral prescriptions will exist without us. If sharks were conscious and could debate about morality they'd say eating your newborn babies is normal family values.

>Because l dont think it is because of ew l think it is because of God.
Okay then if that's your reason you have to prove to me God exists. My argument is it has no moral value whatsoever in an objective or subjective sense. I am totally morally agnostic on faggoty. So prove to me it's immoral.

The concept of "amoral" itself cannot be destinquished from "moral" or "immoral"

Is it moral for a leaf to land on a rock?

Guess what happens in front of CERN

Huh

NO sacred partnership for faggots, no marriages etc, you aren't religious or sacred.. you're a faggot.

Faggotry should just be treated as a piss mist, not open admiration and celebration, you are the faggot why the fuck am i or my family being told about your faggotry with the stench of the piss mist rotting away my space while being told how amazing your faggotry is, go be a faggot in your own space and stop destroying mine you fucking faggot.

Second , no adoption. You are a faggot, faggots don't have babies, leave children out of your faggotry. better yet stay away from kids.
Just imagine how disgusting you have to be as a faggot to be involved in a pride parade, maybe anyone doing that should just be flatout jailed for pedophilia i don't know.

there's probaby more rules for fags that are required.

Something being amoral is a subjective standard to where morality applies or and where it doesn't.
You think necrophilia and incest is ok, I personally think an ideal society would outlaw these things, also why do you assume whether something physically harms someone or not is the decision maker on right or wrong.
Also demonstrate the physical harm done on a non consenting corpse.

So when i tell you for no reason it is the same as yours.

It's not. You say "God said so" I say I'm not convinced faggotry has any moral value in either direction.

Who is this "you" you are talking about??

You, which I have more proof of existing than your God even though you could be a figment of my imagination.

And yet you are sure it doesn't fall into the catagory lol.

Yes, because you can't prove it and when I ask you to you say "It's just what I think bro" which is subjective anyway

That is a question genuinely to complicated to get into this late, but spark notes is string theory, single consciousness theory ect.

That proves the Christian God. Single consciousness theory is contradictory to the Christian God.

So you agree you can have non reproductive sex. SHow me a single case of a woman with no uterus having a baby.

None l gues?
Soooo dont fuck trannies??

You just told me only reproductive sex is okay. So you fuck until you're wife is pregnant then stop then only fuck to have another baby. etc.

Usually takes a few tries

That's not true. Is it moral to lick the roof of your mouth right now?

Me saying one thing would be just as justified as me saying anything else from a skeptical standpoint.

No I'm not. I don't think any of our moral prescriptions will exist without us.

Are you a materialist?

Okay then if that's your reason you have to prove to me God exists.

No l dont,
no more then l have to prove the universe exists.

Is it moral for a leaf to land on a rock?

Again, any answer would be just as justified as any other.

no

Doing physical harm against someones consent even if they haven't harmed anyone else can maximize wellbeing, reference to the sheriff argument to utilitarianism.
It's logically possible that maximizing wellbeing can be done through causing physical harm even if non consented.

what could possibli go wrong?

children can't reasonably consent and it's coercive in nature.

Sure they can. Children consent or withhold consent for things all the time. >Is it OBJECTIVELY immoral
You claimed objective morality doesn't exist. So if your alleged grounds for opposing it don't exist... sounds like you don't actually oppose it. As I pointed out hours ago.

I mean hetero and homo. Does that change your view?

It is.

So sex with 8 year olds isn't pedophilia? Fathers raping little daughters isn't pedophilia?

You are.

Nope.

You do.

Nope.

Fraud is ok because the retiree gave the Nigerian prince scammed her money with consent?

No because obviously it was not given with proper consent. She was consenting to giving her money to a Nigerian prince, not a poor nigerian using an internet cafe.

you view incest as moral

Depends on the case. I would view some cases as immoral and some as amoral

Necrophilia

Immoral given that most people don't want their body defiled. But if it was consented to beforehand then go ahead.

was correct in stating that you are in favor of child molestation and bestiality

Nope I'm against both of those. I already said why in another post.

It's not. You say "God said so" I say I'm not convinced faggotry has any moral value in either direction.

Yeah because you cant understand how meaningless any of those terms are by the very standards you are appealing to.

You, which I have more proof of existing than your God even though you could be a figment of my imagination.

How?

Yes, because you can't prove it

How can you identify an absence of a catagory you cannot define?

hat proves the Christian God. Single consciousness theory is contradictory to the Christian God.

Wrong but again to late for that shit.

If you've been on this site for more than a week, you've seen fag porn posted here.

What's with Americans always seeing secret homosexual subtexts, or just sexualizing stuff in general?

Do they honestly think no one will ever notice how 20 years ago they were just asking: “Why do you care what people do in the privacy of their own bedroom?

We are WAY past that. That was 60 years ago. They were blowing each other with fetish gear on in the street during the 80s.

So if gay pride parades didn't exist you'd be pro gay marriage?

No. We’re just pointing out how dishonest you are.

Maybe people wouldn't care so much if fags didn't parade down the streets naked and groom children in fucking public. Fags have never kept it in their own houses since it was legalised and that's a bad thing.

Dude I literally just want pic related to fuck off and that triggered you to 29+PBTID all this tryhard turbologic like it means a damn. I get that it's finals week and you really want that A in discrete math, but proving that there are people who:

don't believe in spreading faggotry to little kids

and

also happen to be retarded and bad at arguing

doesn't negate the fact that fags are fucking gross and need to be publicly minecrafted for very obvious reasons.
7/10 b8 made me reply

Things can be amoral

Moral and immoral is a subjective standard

The question to you is what makes something moral and immoral in terms of oughts and then please tell me how you got your ought from a description about reality from physical harm.

if you aren't reproducing in a traditional family you aren't

Does Andrew Tate reproduce or his audience?

why do you assume whether something physically harms someone or not is the decision maker on right or wrong

I'm not sure what else would make sense to appeal to? Since you can't sense morality in any way. You can't study it like a law of nature.

None l gues?

Okay so you agree a straight woman who had to get her uterus removed should never have sex with her husband.

Usually takes a few tries

Yes but my point is once she's pregnant no more sex. Then you can fuck a few times then no more sex. That means no romantic sex for fun.

Me saying one thing would be just as justified as me saying anything else from a skeptical standpoint.

Not really. I'd ask you to justify why you think that. It's pretty clear it's amoral from the view of human wellbeing which is what I'm going by.

Are you a materialist?

I'm not 100% sure. But I don't see any evidence of objective morality so I don't believe it. Same with anti-materialism. I'm open to not being a materialist tho. So I'll say I'm agnostic.

No l dont,

Yes you do if you're saying it's a universal objective law from God

no more then l have to prove the universe exists.

Not when you're talking about a subjective standard that will remain the same even if we're brains in vats or I'm the only true person

Again, any answer would be just as justified as any other.

Really? You can't answer based on a biblical standard?

Yes if you're a utilitarian you can make that argument. I'm not a full on utilitarian since I understand you can have a psychopath with a super brain that feels more pleasure than anybody ever felt before by mass rape and murder.

i don't think you need to do so much mental gymnastics, you interact with other men every day of your life it's inevitable people develop feelings and those preferences

I'm not sure what else would make sense to appeal to? Since you can't sense morality in any way. You can't study it like a law of nature.

Then how did you determine as to whether something is amoral or not, please tell me if it's whether something physically harms you then if you can make an ought from an is so can I.

So if gay pride parades didn't exist you'd be pro gay marriage?

American reading comprehension.

The Venn diagram between any sexuality that isn't plain straight and narcissistic personality disorder is nearly a perfect circle, the only exception being narcissists that aren't fags. They need to be seen and demand your approval; anything less is emotionally indistinguishable from an existential threat to them.

The faggots spawned their demons the troons which decided to build nightmarish discord honeypots inside normal spaces filled with troon propaganda to lure children into their spaces which is where they give away several concoctions of hormones to children on discord.

You are reminding me of how much i hate fucking faggots, these fuckers will always try swindle and jew you and point the finger at the other demons in our midst.

I don't care if you sword fight with your wieners or suck each other's dicks, but I draw the line at anal sex. It's such an unnatural act, that doing it in a natural setting (i.e. no antibiotics or enemas) literally gives you an infection inside your urethra.

So sex with 8 year olds isn't pedophilia? Fathers raping little daughters isn't pedophilia?

Both would be child rape which can exist with or without pedophilia. Both would also be sodomy, which you endorse. As well as child rape, which you endorse. And incest, which you endorse.

Nope.

Yup

Nope.

Yup

No because obviously it was not given with proper consent. She was consenting to giving her money to a Nigerian prince, not a poor nigerian using an internet cafe.

Oh, cool. So you're not using the definition of "consent" in the dictionary, you're just redefining "consent" to be anything which allows the things you like and disallows the things you dislike? Well then just shift whatever definitions you need to oppose sodomism.

Depends on the case. I would view some cases as immoral and some as amoral

And this is why every non-jewish society ever would have killed you long ago.

Immoral given that most people don't want their body defiled.

Proof?

But if it was consented to beforehand then go ahead.

Again, you should be executed.

Nope I'm against both of those. I already said why in another post.

You're not. You very explicitly said the reason you would oppose those doesn't exist. If you don't have a reason for opposing something, you don't oppose it.

What will happen when a deadly virus comes out that is spread primarily by fags? Fags will fight to keep bathing houses open.

Also

this thread

"Oh no, my based gayerinos"

Lmao, fags. pol apparently is a leftist gay board.

You did mental gymnastics by dodging the entailment of your position, you called me disingenuous but you lost the second you failed give a syllogism to prove the fundamental difference as to why your standard doesn't apply to allowing incest and necrophilia.
At least the american retard said it's ok.

No, because marriage is between a biological man and a biological woman. Faggots should simply not be allowed to exist openly in public. Homosexuality should be a criminal offence just as bestiality or incest is.

I can't remember an instance where I have, but I rarely watch the webm's posted. If I did come across one I certainly wouldn't watch close enough to determine cleanliness.

Go back to twitter, you retarded feminist.
We are ok with homosexuality when men do it.

Marriage is supposed a sacred religious ceremony. The government having it be such a critical factor in how it carries out judicial action is heinous.

NOBODY should be allowed to be legally considered married. It shouldn't matter.

That being said, gays are literally not supposed to be married. It's not a matter of opinion. The religion that coined marriage strictly prohibits it.

The fact gays are so obsessed with corrupting religious tenants is nonsensical and dangerous. Separate marriage from government and the problem is solved.
Faggots just can't help themselves though. Their defining character trait is lack of self control.

That's a good enough answer.
If your a layman and want a basic standard for finding out what you think is right start simple.
Ask what kind of person would do this action? Observe the people that do these actions.
Only do the moral actions in which you wish to see repeated in everyone else.
If the actions you do was to be repeated in everyone else what would society look like? And furthermore would humans still even exist?

you interact with other men every day of your life it's inevitable people develop feelings and those preferences

Lmao. I'd suspect I'm a good deal older than you and I have never once felt anything approaching romantic or sexual feelings for a man.
If this is not only happening to you, but so often that it's "inevitable" that is very much a problem in your head.

flag

Yeah, should have known.

I think molesting kids is the biggest reason to hate all kinds of faggots for most people

Why the fuck are there so many posters on Anon Babble that talk and think like a literal nun

What's wild is the bible says drinking is cool if your life sucks too.
However if you want to be a king you can't drink.

God is pretty cool

Rightist politics go hand in hand with Christianity. It's very near impossible to be one without being the other.

Well necrophilia should be obvious it's a corpse, incest is a bit more nebulous/arbitrary it's just commonly accepted it's gross and kind of pointless because out of all the humans on the planet why would you do that. I just always thought this line of argument was really retarded "Oh you think fucking a dude is OK, does that mean fucking a kid is OK to you?" obviously not, it's just so random and retarded

This

just this

The greatest trick the devil played was convincing the world he does not exist.

LOL meanwhile every irl christian who isn't a Anon Babblelarper:

Nuh uh, it's them democrats who's the real racists! Them's immigrents is happy to be here and work harder than these entitled m'lennyalls. I don't got no problum with them black folks! Praise Israel!

inevitable for the human species as a whole there's no reason to have a hang up if someone developed those feelings it's bound to happen for some people, I don't really care about your sex life

I didn't say kid, I repeated the two necessary conditions back to you retard.
You still can't give me objections, saying it's obvious is called question begging.
It's obvious to me that homosexuality is wrong and if you ask why I'll repeat myself and we can both question beg.
Also if you claim it doesn't apply to necrophilia that's called special pleading which you should know.
You don't know how to debate and you're uneducated which is your own fault.

You should be just as grossed out

No, faggot. Homosexuality is deeply repulsive to the overwhelming majority of normal people on Earth. You don't understand how fucked your brain is. Trying to normalize it is such a fucking waste of time. You just don't get it becuase you're a faggot. You are literally faulty in the brain. You don't deserve to mistreated for that alone, but the fact you have turned it into a religion like this means you will face consequences both personally and culturally when the planet realizes what you faggots are up to. There's already countries purging you in violent revolutions, it is only a matter of time before it happens in the west.

Keep fucking pushing it. Please. Speed up the process.

Wish we had a degenerate pride parade here, with all the pissing and sucking and fucking instead of this crap where the local gays carry a flag and walk with the same zest of HIV patient in the terminal stage of the disease. Estonia is so pozzed by the Soviet fascist regime that even their gay prides resemble more a Stalinist march then the Depraved Carnival of the US.
The conservatives here and purebred Estonians are the biggest homosexual demographic group here. Nazis around Tartu used sodomy as in initiation rite, and then do private orgies to stregthen the Eesti puha vaimu between themselves, the understanding being that the Estonian spirit resides in cum and it must not be wasted by idle masturbation. It must either go into a cunt or the mouth or arse of another Estonian. Father and son relationship between Estonian is extremely homosexual: cuddling of the ass in public, kissing on the mouth in public, fathers bathing with sons, checking genitals, forced fellatio for patriotic reasons. The Sojavagi is the gay place to be. It's an orgy of cock.
So, yeah, homosexuality in Estonia goes hand in hand with right wing beliefs.

Christians are substantially less likely race mix, support immigration, and they have orders of magnitude more children than fedoras or new agers.
Even if you weren't lying about what they say, and you are, what they do is right wing. Whereas your fellow fedora has spent hours in this thread defending sodomy, incest, and necrophilia.

Yeah, this still sounds like you assuming everyone suffers from the same fucked up trauma you personally do.

It's obvious to me that homosexuality is wrong

You haven't given any reasons why that is obvious, you just make weird comparisons "If you think fucking a guy is OK, then how about fucking your sister? GET PWNT" it's retarded and pseudo shit argument we've seen all the time, replace incest with pedophilia or bestiality seen it all. You're living in your own fantasy world where getting a blowie from a guy is the same as sticking your dick in a literal rotting corpse lol it's so retarded there isn't even a real good way to counter it all you can say is well I guess your autistic brain just can't comprehend why fucking a corpse is weirder than fucking half the consenting population

The evola pagan types don't do any better than the fedora tippers, pretty sad case.
One was telling me how prostitution is antithetical to feminism, dumbest shit I've heard on this board.
If you look at the fraternal birth order study that's pretty eye opening and it's also factually true that homosexuals weren't exposed to enough testosterone while in the womb, they basically have brain damage, if exposed to too much testosterone there is also pretty bad consequences but no distortion of heterosexual orientation.

The reasons for banning sodomy should be obvious.
And the fact that someone pointing out logical inconsistencies in your worldview makes you upset in no way makes the criticism less valid.
Now if you want to say you don't care, you're just inconsistent, and you want to bang the things you dislike and allow the things you do like, fine. But don't be surprised when we do the same. And there's a lot more of us who oppose sodomy than you who favor it.

this happens alot with adoption
I don't understand why cps doesn't check on kids for at least the first year after they get adopted

No
Fags are genetic dead ends, they can't reproduce, nature would naturally cull them from the gene pool if it wasn't for forced intervention.
Ass fucking and pussy bumping is a genetic dead end. If you can't even do the most basic thing that protozoans do (reproduce) your genetic line deserves to be erased.
Also, it naturally evokes a similar reaction in men as watching maggots eat rotten flesh, its disgusting and should be shunned and pushed out of decent society.

Really? You can't answer based on a biblical standard?

Dude its clear your just a fag who is mad people find the faggot sex you have immoral.
You keep applying skeptical critiques to fucking everything yet feel acknowledge that by the logic of skepticism theres no way to know anything (even the coherence of your own subjective thoughts) and thus basis for anything.
lf you're going to play by skeptical rules l'm gona take it to its logical endpoint and say that nothing means anything and something being wrong as the same as it being right or meaningless.
That is the logical endpoint of your ideology and regardless of if you are intelligent enough to realize it or not it remains the case.

FAGGOT DEMONS AND THEIR LIES.

It's a jewish creation.

*yet fail to aknowledge
*is the same as

If I tell you that sexual actions are ok so long as they comport to the standard which in this case is being an adult and consenting then many things apply I never said bestiality or pedophilia.
If you don't need to give reasons as to why incest or necrophilia is "obviously wrong" then I don't need to as well, if you can question beg I can too and I already gave my argument I actually hold to and I said I'm not arbitrary about my standard.
I'm not going to reply to you if you special plead, question beg and be arbitrary, tough luck you suck dick.

The evola pagan types don't do any better than the fedora tippers, pretty sad case.

Yeah I'd class them as new agers since their connection to pre-Christian European cult praxis is virtually non-existant.

One was telling me how prostitution is antithetical to feminism, dumbest shit I've heard on this board

Audibly loled.

Gays don't need marriage to blow each other in fetish gear.
The gays that DO get married tend to be more monogamous and less degenerate than the ones that don't get married.

Gay marriage unironically is like burt and ernie. It's the unmarried ones visiting a different "gay bar" / bathhouse every other night that you need to watch out for.

it's just power plays.
and the greatest of them is to say something that is objectively untrue, yet have everyone nod along anyway and pretend they aren't aware that you just lied.
it's why women love telling blatant lies so much, too.

I don't understand why cps doesn't check on kids for at least the first year after they get adopted

Fear of being labeled a bigot and unpersoned.

The religion that coined marriage strictly prohibits it.

Marriage has existed in every culture on the planet. Why do sand tribes get a monopoly?

It doesn't work like that, being obscenely degenerate in public is the cornerstone of gay culture. The image of the quiet, sensible, gay man, who is just like you or me, is a creation of 40 years of propaganda aimed at marketing homosexuality to the general public.

CPS is just as corrupt and incompetent as any other government institution

They apparently have no problem with that at all. Their disgust reaction is clearly broken.

Anal sex is absolutely disgusting. Even with spending an hour "cleaning out" beforehand, it's still nasty.

t. fag

ive seen faggot homes before, theyre nasty. dildos everywhere, weed and bongs and all sorts of drugs, cocaine and poppers. these werent even boy faggots, these were lesbians. i dont even know or want to know what a man faggots cave looks like. in that lesbian home I even saw a massive 6 foot long double ended dildo so they could fuck each other. you coulda dueled darth maul with that thing

Brother what is with you and necrophilia, it's a rotting corpse. Even putting aside how a corpse can't consent, that is the least of the reasons why it's disgusting. I don't really care if that's what your preferences are it's not the same as fucking a man who is HALF THE POPULATION OF THE PLANET, the moral objection people have for it isn't "Uh what's the difference between fucking a guy and fucking your sister?" it's because of religious reasons. Your brand of logic is far beyond niche, it's braindead just like the corpses you want to fuck. You're alone, and good night!

The gays that DO get married tend to be more monogamous and less degenerate than the ones that don't get married.

There's no evidence for this. As for degree of degeneracy when you're mashing your face and genitals into feces, I can't even begin to imagine how you'd measure that.

Gay marriage unironically is like burt and ernie. It's the unmarried ones visiting a different "gay bar" / bathhouse every other night that you need to watch out for.

Again, there's not really any evidence for this. But even assuming it were true, there's no reason to undermine one of the foundational pillars of civilization just to keep a handful of sodomites from being quite as brazen in their evil.

Straight men live horrible miserable lives and murder the women they are supposedly attracted to but then come to Anon Babble to seethe about gays lmao.

I oppose gay marriage purely out of spite for the left. I want to take things from them that they want and force them to waste time and resources fighting to get them back.

Apparently not enough to stop you from doing it.

90% of posts here (who aren't bots or NGO shills) just post shit for the lulz.
It's more fun to try and rile up some gays than it is to just post in a fucking general or something.
Also occasionally you learn something new by doing that.

Based.

Why are you such a faggot anon?

A person can consent for whatever usage of their body for when they die, just like the donation of a liver.

Yet we've never given a child or dog monkeypox.

No instead you had a whole pedo island and pedo ring to rape little girls and a plane called Lolita Express even your heterosexual president used.

I've had a gay guy proudly brag to me about getting fucked by a dog at a saint Patricks day party. It wasn't even a sexual conversation. I was telling him about my dog and he just started being weird before telling me.

That never happened, anon.

16 years old is not really what anyone would call a "little girl". Nor did most heterosexuals visit epstein's island.
Whereas the children you gave monkeypox to were in the 6-8 range. And sodomites report having been sexually abused as children at right around 100%.

alwasy suspect a gay that owns a dog

Oh it did, if you hang out with gay dudes you will hear some shit. They have absolutely no filter so long as they think you're cool with them.

All the girls we trafficked and raped were 16, i swear

Straight men are such a joke lmao. Allergic to accountability. One second making threads about how they want an underage girlfriend, the next one accusing other groups of being pedophiles.

Don't forget please you guys had a culture surrounding these ideas like bug chasers, the "gift", etc.
You celebrate giving aids as if it's some cat and mouse game.

its probably didnt but I believe it anyways. gays have a weird thing for disgusting exhibitionism and corrupting others. they love to tell other people about their disgusting habits and lifestyle, its part of their fetish

Yes, they all do that. Both abuse animals and force that garbage on anyone around them. Because sodomy isn't sex and they don't engage in it for the reasons humans engage in sex. It's why they insist on parades. That is to force their deviance on you. It's why they all rape children as well.

No. The point is that the fag pride parades reveal the propaganda about fags being normal to be bullshit and shows they're actually gross perverts.

Sounds like a better culture than pedo islands, pedo planes, pedo cults, pedo hollywood rings, etc.
That's of course the situations in which you rape children, let's not mention the ones in which you kill them, which happens rather often.

Wonder why you straights refuse to take any accountability for your actions.

I am terminally online and never leave my house so i make imaginary scenarios about random strangers and groups i never interacted with!!!

I feel sorry for you. I guess you incels have such sad miserable lives you need to find all sort of distractions to not pay attention to your sexless, bitter, loveless heterosexuality.

I hope you don't murder a woman because you can't have sex. You straights are very prone to doing that.

it's just obese smelly faggots being envious that even on "yes we're having sex" parade nobody would ever give them even a hug
good thing there's a bible with all of the gomorrah shit they can escape to

They were all in the 16-18 range. Yeah. I'm not even defending anything I have no skin in the game. I'll gladly denounce jew sex traffickers. I wonder why you won't denounce raping 8 year olds or dogs. Doesn't really sound like accountability.

Took me one second to google it to prove you wrong.
I truly wonder how miserable and pathetic your life must be you try to lie and make up shit on the internet to try and win an argument on Anon Babble when you're so easily proven wrong.

The cherry on the cake being "W-well yes us straights rape 11 year old children but... THOSE WERE JEWS SO IT DOESN'T COUNT OK?!!!". lmao.

lets be honest she probably deserved it. bitch drove the man to a psychotic break

I mean, you'd have to embrace muzzie levels of 'no public displays of affection' for everyone or otherwise be a hypocrite. Kiss your wife in public? NO. Spank ass at any time for any reason. NO. Get seen having a quickie, better sodoku. Wear your burka at all times.

No... no one here has said "us straights rape 11 year olds". Lmao. You have admitted to raping 8 year olds, dogs, and intentionally spreading GRIDS and being proud of doing so.

That's not what hypocrisy is anon...

I renounce Satan and all his works, but that performance looks fucking cool

Bro you literally just lied and said they were all 16-18. You were proven wrong so fast. Now you're denying and trying to change the topics. "You have admitted to" nothing, i didn't admit to shit and i've done nothing. You on the other side decided to open Anon Babble to make up shit on the internet. How are you not embarrassed of lying in Anon Babble and immediately being called out?

I get out more than the average Anon, and i still remember what the gays in my high school and college were like. there was one gay kid in my high school that posted cp of himself all over facebook. I dated one girl who had a fag friend, and she told me about a time she slept over at his and his boyfriends apartment and had loud, smelly, farty sex in the same room as her while she was trying to sleep. mind you this was a liberal fag hag who always bitched at me for not being pro gay rights or whatever and she was bitching about having to smell sweaty faggot anal sex farts all night.

Avatarfags as underage anime little girl

>THIS TOTALLY HAPPENED AND UHHH FARTS FARTS AND UHHH GAYS ARE EVIL!

Incels are so embarrassing.

They just want to do stuff in the privacy of their bedroom!

So

There's a neat trick: if a counter argument starts with "So.." it's probably a misrepresentation of the argument, i.e. a strawman

There is a particular perversion added to this, which is the corruption of innocence: projecting homophilia onto a tv program for toddlers. These things go hand in hand.

p-posting anime girls on an anime website?!?!?!

yes gays are evil and they have very smelly, farty sex apparently, from the first hand account of a liberal college girl that spent a night with a fag couple

unwittingly signed up to participate in a making-people-watch fetish

Kek. This should be classified as sexual assault, but let me guess she never reported it?

The elite who try and push your demonic shit also act on similar demonic desires...

Good one faggot

God vaporized 2 cities. He did it because they had homolust.

A. It wasn't a lie. I am correct.
B. Even if you had proved anything wrong, that in no way suggests anyone has defended anything.
C. When it was pointed out that you rape children and dogs and intentionally spread GRIDS, you stated that was better than having sex with 16-18 year old girls. Which is obviously a tacit admission.

But more importantly, like all browns, you seem to be struggling with "per capita." Less than 1% of straight men visited the island. Over 95% of sodomites report having raped children. More over, utilizing jew sex traffickers is incidental to a man's heterosexuality. Whereas the de facto 100% of sodomites who report molesting pre-pubescent children, they say that they do so *because* they are sodomites

Fuck your individualism faggot liberal

50% of gay men are victims of child sexual abuse perpetrated by homosexual men. only 3% of straight men are victims of child sexual abuse.

the gay sex lobby has no response for this

Lmao. If you read anything I said and took it as pro-individualism, you need to work on your reading comprehension.

50% of gay men are victims of child sexual abuse perpetrated by homosexual men

50? The lowest I've ever seen is 83%. And that excludes those who forgot/repressed or don't consider the rape and assault.

You need to finally realize that if you stopped all child sex abuse for 20 years, the rate of homosexuality in the subsequent generation would fall to the baseline biological level of like 1 in 100,000

If you also made sure everyone had healthy developmental hormone levels, the rate would drop to statistically negligent levels. In other words there would be no gays.

Per your morality questions, ignore the christcucks, you can tap into the logic of reproductive morality by considering extinction scenarios. What is the morality of homosexuality, or any of your non-breeding examples, if we are on the verge of extinction? Pretty clear right?

but we're not on the verge of extinction

So thus you admit that your non-breeding examples are luxuries of abundance, aka not foundational? Everyone else can sense that too, which is why every example you gave feels wrong, and having kids feels right. Extinction threats are baked into our DNA, thus the gay is a jungian unconscious archetype of annihilation; a harbinger of doom.

Also it's just gross and God hates fags

Now do the amount of women victims of straight men.

Do they honestly think no one will ever notice how 20 years ago they were just asking:

>"Why do you care what people do in the privacy of their own bedroom?

Yeah I remember that.

"But we just want to be left alone"
"But we don't want to introduce this to children"
and so on

Keep in mind that this board had a rupture to the boomersphere in 2016

you have no response.

You're so close to understanding the difference between being gay and a fucking insufferable faggot

Hello, I’m the guy, ooooh, ahhh.. errrrr. I come in peeeeeeeeace

It’s honestly fucking wild how fags “celebrate” pride. Firstly, it’s a sexual preference, it’s like me throwing a parade to celebrate I like Toyotas. It’s fucking stupid. Then the way in which they celebrate if wild, They don’t have a parade where they hold signs that say “celebrating equal rights” and historical figures and such, nope. They dress in leotards adorned with dildos from head to toe, while marching along side grown adults in fetish gear and S&M and novelty items.

They don’t even have the decency to cover up if kids happen to be near by, I’ve seen videos of parade blimps with a guy getting pissed on and another being fisted. Niggers tongue the anus also

fags and groomers overlap alot. they really do reproduce by grooming kids.

Correct. If faggots kept it in the closet I literally do not care who fucks who behind closed doors. Or who marries who, behind closed doors. Faggots get the fuck back in the closet.

There were a couple in my neighborhood growing up. They were obvious faggeritos, but they didn’t have rainbow flags flying outside their house, their cars weren’t littered with stickers of faggy catch phrases and rainbow flags. And even though it was a conservative state in a conservative city, they were respectful to everyone and so nobody bothered them.

Anytime someone would bring them up, they always said the same thing; as long as they ain’t fucking animals or kids, and it’s between consenting adults in the privacy of their home, it’s none of our business.

I do wish we could go back to those times. Also, niggers tongue poopy dirty abused

Into the woodchipper you go faggot

Got me a good kek, Anon.

when it's actually just this

Well, yeah. This but also getting a pozload in your neghole from masked anonymous men in the sex club every weekend.

Lol madfag here, fuck off fagboy

Now it all makes sense, huh?

Gays are jews?

How is this different from the SVO, the random chance of dismemberment ?

i only started hating faggots/troons when they started up with picrel. prior to that if they did their dirty business in private, it was none of my concern.

now i want them all exterminated, wipe these degenerates off the map.