If only you knew how bad it's going to get
If only you knew how bad it's going to get
paywall
our mind control techniques worked really well on reddit!
yeah no shit?
Positivity-bias trained yes-men bots trying to persuade Reddit users aka other positivity-bias trained yes-men bots pretending to be humans
I heckin' love future.
AI's talk to themselves on reddit.
HAY LETS TRY TO PERSUADE PEOPLE ON A PLACE WHERE THEY WERE PERSUADED TO CUT THEIR OWN DICK OFF THROUGH PEER PRESSURE
our bots were able to persuade retarded redditors
let me know when they're smart enough to persuade humans
I persuade redditors all the time, and human people on Anon Babble too, and it's very easy. It's actually extremely easy to persuade anyone on anything if you can research that specific person and keep applying pressure on specific topics to them.
I was persuaded away from being a vehement racist and anti-semite, becoming more tolerant because the people who persuaded me convinced me that the hatred and contempt I had for the world's vermin was something which hurt me far more than it did anyone else. Even if I believe it to be true, I can still identify with what and who and how it persuaded me, etc.
just edging out human baseline while benefitting from the deception of appearing human
it's worthless. even if they never learn of the deception, people will adapt quickly to any rhetorical technique.
It's actually extremely easy to persuade anyone of an obvious and useful truth
ftfy
plebbit
According to our data, our cyber-engineered velociraptor can beat a toddler in a fight.
ask jusus for true challenges nigga.
singularity
Believing there's such a thing as an obvious and useful truth shows you've been persuaded into falling for the illusions of an objective reality tunnel. There is no such thing as truth just as there is no such thing as lies: There is a primordial chaos of which things erupt from and we create an illusion of order for ourselves to operate in this chaos. That illusion of order itself births an illusion of disorder to someone who makes their oaths to it, which is what you do as a baby when you're retarded and being persuaded by adults to live in their reality tunnels.
I have no doubt in my mind the world be better off without any jews or niggers at all, however I cannot facilitate such a world and my emotions conflict with this because I was also indoctrinated into a reality tunnel with the ornaments of "do no harm" and "be loving" firmly embedded into myself. In the wild our obvious and true facts useful to us in society would have us be eaten by lions in a matter of seconds.
I consider any AI that doesn't agree with me on almost every issue an enemy created by leftists.
Stay tuned for our next breakthrough study where we persuade children to do things by giving them candy.
r*ddit isn’t exactly a shining beacon of individuals who stand firm in their own convictions
The baseline "gullibility" of the target shouldn't really matter, the control group was humans trying to convince the same audience the AI was trying to convince, yet AI outperformed the humans at persuasion by 3-6x
redditors easily manipulated by AI
Redditors are inept and incompetent compared to ai (or literally anything else)
Wow. Groundbreaking stuff.
In a nominalistic universe I can choose to accept or reject the argument that nothing exists based on expediency. In this case it would be hypocritical not to because you're talking as though things exist. If things exist, everything exists as a concept, and many things exist physically or structurally.
You can break down everything into subjective labels, where you stop breaking them down and how high you're willing to build them up is also subjective. Thus, "reality" which is just your program's function for labeling things and proving them to fit that label is still subjective in its own containers much like a snake biting its tail.
Redd*t is very easy and inhumane in how they communicate though it's probably very similar to north koreans
Subjectivity is just human nature. There are millions of subjects which creates a strong continuity. It's the opposite of what you say, a man can destroy as many concepts as he wants, but nothing will change except by action.
Everything is changing nonstop, and I can create a strong continuity out of any stupid bullshit I want. We are human nature, and the only thing we know is from that container and nothing else. Until we become something which was never and will never be human, we will never know what life is like outside of that box.
You can imagine a strong continuity but you can't convince it into existence. You can deceive people and exploit the trust of the community, maybe even make a fortune and get away with your crimes, but it will never stand up to scrutiny.
Until we become something which was never and will never be human, we will never know what life is like outside of that box.
Then its a good thing we grew up with so many other parts of nature and we've been creating AIs for thousands of years. The written word is AI, mathematics are AI. When you think in numbers or statistics, you're behaving like an alien intelligence, doing something that doesn't, or didn't come naturally to the human brain. It never would've existed if not for the underlying nature that introduced it. You can reject the human experience entirely and say we're brains in a jar, but again that doesn't match the words of your post.
Now do Anon Babble, where no one is convinced of anything but their own bullshit and even if they are convinced they'll still tell you you're wrong. Kek.
Keep track of how many cattle you have is literal alien like behaviour totally unnatural to carbon based life forms.
Kek. Retarded take, but I appreciate the effort.
not knowing the long, convoluted ancient history of numbers
pleb
full of easily swayable normies with terrible opinions and outlooks on life.
Try it on Anon Babble and see how persuasive a shill can be against a horde of autists.
Tries to apply sophistry to one of the most understandable and obviously vital behaviors humans exhibit.
The very first homo-sapiens would've understood abstract concepts like numbers without being told about them.
Herd has lots of animals
Other tribe has more men, low chance of winning
The very first homo-sapiens would've understood abstract concepts like numbers without being told about them.
no, they wouldn't. They understood more or less but not one, two, or zero. You're not reading my posts at a high enough level, I said "thinking in numbers" which is different from understanding multiple objects. You're also not writing at a high enough level, everyone (probably even you) knows the abstract concept of numbers was developed over time and was so recent, we actually have some historical record. The material reality of numbers existed and was understood long before, that's what you're talking about. Not what I'm talking about.
Unironically the only people with the rhetorical and analytical skills to combat this shit are here because this is where the shit is tested and trialed
who read it please somebody give me the DEETS!
There’s multiple obvious agents in the threads about ICE vs courts right now, it’s a fascinating character study of the clearly green recruits they assign here.
Fuck bots shitting up threads
Is this you?
only problem I have with AI is that they lie like motherfuckers. They sound like they know what they are talking about but you can trust none of it
If you install an archive plugin on your browser of choice you can select several sites that likely archived the content before it was paywalled or by someone that paid.
Please do so.
The AI presenting itself as human is an unfair advantage. Think how easy it would be to convince people as a human pretending to be chatgpt.
i asked an LLM if my mathematical proof was sufficient
it said yes
on a test i lucked out and got that question
used the same proof and got 0 points on that question
Do you have any recommendations? Is there a way to disable the paywall with ublock?
Just us FF or Brave plugin search and type "archive". I have "Web Archives" that offers 8 sites to check. If archive.is doesn't have it, which is half rare, I just click another and usually it's good.
Illusion of objective truth
It's an objective truth that you're a midwit.
they persuaded other retard bots.
He clearly doesn't believe that and was just trying to "convince" or demonstrate rhetorical superiority. Even if he achieved rhetorical victory it would still be an obvious falsehood. At least two layers of shit argument.