You hate people because of their skin color!
Why do liberals say this? I hate Negroids regardless of their skin color.
You hate people because of their skin color!
Why do liberals say this? I hate Negroids regardless of their skin color.
I urge you to read a book on human biology. I know you won't. I know you're too stupid to do so because you're afraid it will challenge your baseless preconceived notions on "race". ;)
You have to go back sweaty
this is a good question actually. I have closely examined this topic. tldr; control in any system requires a circularity identity
read a book
i did and it reinforced my beliefs in political meaningfulness of genetic clusters
Like hell we anons would read a fucking book, because a random whore on Anon Babble challenged us. Kys retard. Your awareness level is that of a sheboon
Names are not just fancy words. We sort of mark our existence with them. In a way it is the territory you claim. Therefore this is just as much a discussion about power as it is semantics.
color is not Identity. Certainly biological difference is real and meaningful but color does not identify that. The liberal knows what difference is and knows identity is meaningful, but forcing you to reduce that to color is their way of celebrating the subjugation of meaning in differences. What they are really saying is, "we have created situation in which identity is so meaningless that the closest thing to associate with it is color". This is why I say to stop naming yourself a color even if you don't have a true name. The truth is we really are nameless
x.com
All it did we reinforce my hate for women and gays.
Now let me explain why this benefits the liberal and what compels them to do this. like I said before, a circularity of identity is essential to control systems or just control in any system in general. This includes living systems, social systems, and especially neurological systems. I will explain it further in this article:
x.com
While most of civilization was built upon the storage of capital for later use, what we have become accustomed to is a lifestyle based entirely upon consumption. Saudi Arabia for example, according to Adam Smith, should be the wealthiest nation ever, but in actuality it is only as wealthy as people buy their petroleum products. The moment we found large oceans of petroleum energy we have been constructing an open ended system that requires very little feedback into its maintenance.
Before fossil energy a community had to give as much or more than what they take to store for later use; like a seed crop or surplus production. The management of limited resources required hierarchy and social planning. Cheap available energy liberates people from the behaviors of feedback in a closed system that would otherwise reward social planning. Everything that a liberal desires can be quantified by the ability to create right angles in nature with energy they never had to make. The hypermoralization in pursuit of surplus energy (feed the world, world peace, end all violence, etc), is an evolutionary mismatch expressed as the need to fill an empty void in the pursuit of endless boundaries absent of limitations. Very few have considered how much their lives will have to change when those limitations become apparent.
the article is a very dense abbreviation of a highly complex topic. There is a reference in the comments with a breakdown by grok
You take things too literally buddy. It's a you problem.
Why do liberals say this?
it is not intuitively obvious but the ultimate answer to this question is something like this:
an evolutionary mismatch induced by the desire to consume energy resources that are freely available and to do so unrestricted by anything.
The liberal is basically a monkey on a feeding frenzy and their is hydrocarbons.
Most primates do not form hierarchies. They gather spontaneously around the nearest fertile female and beg for attention. Instead of forming strata they chase away the younger offspring. The natural tendency among lower primates is to exclude or dispose of the younger offspring (particularly male) to maintain dominance hierarchies. This behavior towards young males is only balanced by the social organization implemented by primates proficient in communication. If communication is but a tool for pointing with words, it is easy to understand why the upright primate, which is the tool wielding species, will utilize language to establish order among communities. The primate who stands upright does not use his hands to walk. His brain which evolved for balancing on two legs is equally useful for abstraction. It was made possible therefore to use language as a recursive extension of his cognitive domain. The dominance hierarchy for the upright primate was able to extend beyond Erectus alone.
The evolution of the human genus was not a linear progression to uprightness with Homo Erectus at the bottom. Homo Erectus populations continued to persist and evolve as independent self sustaining populations up to about 100,000 years ago and integrated with settled communities forming what we know as civilization
What is the significance of is this comparison to monkeys and why is it so important? Well it is actually somewhat true. The range of biological difference extends into many complex independent domains and one of those are our relationship to lower primates. We can treat it as just an analogy but know that there is real truth underlying this observation. By using this comparison and in combination with understanding the *actual* cause of their behavior we can identify with 95% certainty who is and is not a liberal despite what they say and even in circumstances when the person may not know that they are a liberal. Picrel demonstrates this method. Andrew Tate may or may not know he is a liberal or may not care. I certainly do not care, and you don't have to either. Nothing matters what he says. He is a liberal, and if or when you succeed at actually enforcing control and enacting political resolutions he will not like it. He will inevitably resist your state of harmony without serious reformations. It doesn't matter to me how many hoes he yells at. Everyone knows the worst thing you can do is ignore them
This is the solution anons:
If the liberal prevents you from identifying yourself, identify the liberal.
image
Because I can still see the skin?
Because nobody is allowed to hypothesize blacks are inferior, anymore. It's not allowed in the process of discussing issues anymore. so the leap is made to a skin color issue
Shut the fuck jew
Kek. Say that to my sickle cell… oh wait I’m not a nigger.
Nigglets can’t recognize themselves in a mirror until around age six vs 1-2 years for non negroids.
kek nobody here is your buddy you kike rat
nice word games you got there though, you people like to flip-flop between really grabbing onto every word and pilpuling endlessly about the meaning of it, but when its you say something silly then its "ohh i didnt achsually mean to say that it was just a joke goy, even though i totally push this agenda always 100% serious meaning exactly what i say"
You even take it further actually, saying that people who dont want to live with niggers are "afraid of melanin", ive heard that phrase a hundred fucking times from jew rat mouths.
But sure, "it wasnt literal". Fucking lying jew, hahaha
Getting pretty tired of your shit btw, you realize that you rats have been expelled from every society you have ever infested?
How much time do you think you still have, considering you're far away from your home in india where you started your wandering as canaanite gypsies?
How long till your next expulsion? And will it be your final one?
You might think Vaush is a liberal, and perhaps that is true, but he is far less liberal than Andrew Tate. Vaush is nation bound, Tate is not. Vaush livestreams everyday with an American flag. He depends mostly on donations from his users and is probably supported by NGO's. He is not omg masturbating to the next Iphone release. He studies philosophy (if thats what you call it) and values knowledge. Ultimately when a solution arises that requires control and results in harmonious outcomes Vaush will probably not shit a brick. He will probably just be gay about it but oh well. That's okay
Blood/tissue/organ transplant is race-specific. Just inform them of this when they say race is a social construct.
The scientific term for race is haplogroup
No. You're more likely to find a match within your race, but it's not exclusive.
*as an important caveat, Tate being a liberal does not mean necessarily that he cannot also be friendly, or useful, or an ally of sorts. But knowing that he is a liberal is also knowing how useful he can actually be in this form.
what then should be the name?
This is not an easy question to answer. Because if it is not correct you might as well not say it. Like I said, if you are an upright primate, your name is much like your territory. You can go anywhere but you are still you if you can in-fact be that identity. It is not something entirely determined by biology. There is not an equation to tell you what everyones' name is. Genetic sequencing is actually just a comparison to reference populations from an earlier date. Your genes only say, you are you and some one else may be similar, but it does not say what that is. We decide what that is, and we can decide not to decide. So acquiring a name is much like acquiring sovereignty, and in many ways the two are indistinguishable. Knowing the complexity of this relationship is understanding its power, because otherwise it would not matter, yet it does. In a way, it is the definition of power, or the way in which that definition arises. Like the resolution of an image; to know its true name is to see it most clearly. And much like the resolution of an image we can describe the dynamics of systems in the same way. You will acquire your name through the interactions and relations brought about by the harmonious resolution of relationships. Identity is identifying that, and therefore identity has a very physical and mechanical occurrence where meaning becomes apparent through the completion of process. In this system the least meaningful outcome is one where nothing happens at all. Identity is the happening happening.
*This process is called symbolic recursion, and Romulus succeeded at doing it. So now you know why liberals do not like leaders
I will be back later to post more for you faggots. taking questions
youtu.be
Haplogroups are a meme but indeed race-mixing a nigger and a White is as if you bred two entirely different species.
The resulting mutt from a such a mix is genetically so far away from both parents, that neither parent can donate an organ to child as his body would reject it as foreign, and would need to find a donator from such a mix.
This is actually a big problem that race-mixed kids aren't able to find proper donators, and thats also how there is a big organ stealing business in kike land as no kikes would ever donate their organs but there are kikes who need them, so they kill palestinians/syrians/other arabs who are genetically their cousins and steal their organs and sell them to kikes.
Also fun fact, let's say you're White and you mix with a nigger and have a kid.
In that case you're actually more closely related to your White neighbour than your own half-White child.
In fact before WWII human taxonomy was completely normal and everyone knew that there are several different human "root races" and then combinations of them, only after kikes entered academia and started to poison and censor it, suddenly race science became verboten and completely censored.
Class is more important than race
nobody likes a wigger
the liberal technophile will proclaim some scientific faggotry to plug this gap. They are not really scientists. just thirsty idiots
the state will dominate you with violence
The worst parts are how liberals insist all are equal while they claim only white people can be racist, demand whites put all efforts into propping others up rather than make white lives better, and have the gall to demonize whites despite decades of being forced to behave as the angel race for everyone else. Hence you have idiot policies like whites subsidizing other groups by paying $20,000 for the first year of a white baby life so every other group can slop out a baby for free.
Yes. Facts only turn into hate when they are put into proper perspective. These stats are collected from legitimate research sources.
It is a distraction, and none of it doesn't matters to them. Consuming free energy is the only thing matters to them and your understandings of things interfere with that. Making things matter is simply an inconvenience to their consumption habits.
Political, economic, and religious systems may be destroyed and resurrected by men, but the death of a race is eternal.
The liberal is not empathizing with anyone. Putting anyone in any hierarchical relationship interferes with their consumption habits. Notice how the liberal does not like Marcus Garvey or MalcolmX
Where is the color? Point to the color? Do you see the sun or its effects?
This book?
Ya stupid or something?
"Then why can you still tell which is which?"
Because I'm seeing the "skin deep" part and not just the colour of it. If I was seeing skeletons or flayed bodies, then I'd struggle to tell.
Niggers are hideous, and it's not just the color. This is an excellent reminder.
I've read a bunch of books on biology, and anatomy and physiology, and pharmacology, and microbiology. Why can't niggers take ACE-inhibitors and ARBs for their blood pressure? Why doesn't the antipsychotic Zyprexa work well for Japanese people? Shouldn't all medications work the same for us all if we're all exactly the same?
Help me understand, brilliant liberalanon. I'm confused. Teach me what my 8 years in university couldn't...
it will challenge your baseless preconceived notions on "race".
All I got from my few dives into human biology show we were genetically engineered from Homo Erectus by an outside source and the evidence is blatantly in our faces.
Also Aboriginees arent fully human, and the "races" as we know them are more akin to subspecies than breeds.
Ancestry.com and the entire science of genealogy proves it's real. There is no functional difference between race and genetic ethnicity. Technically any group with a shared culture can be considered an ethnicity (like, "goths") which is why it's even stranger that services like Ancestry use the word ethnicity in place of race.
I even got upvoted on fucking Reddit for pointing this out and saying there's no difference between how the words race and ethnicity are used in relation to genetics. It's a very strange phenomenon - race is apparently not real but also totally measurable in exact percentages in any person.
And one more thing before this retard tries to claim race is some pseudo-scientific term that refers to a quasi-religous belief about the 4 races or whatever. No, you're wrong and retarded. That was just an early scientific claim that was eventually expanded upon into countless races.
What is the difference between race and ethnicity when we can genetically measure your "ethnicity" and refer to it with the exact same terms that were once called races??
Once you realize this it becomes obvious why medical advancement has hit all time lows this century. In many cases doctors are taught anatomically incorrect information about how humans work so of course they can't come up with any good ideas when they fundamentally misunderstand how humans work!
do you think he believes you are wrong? describe for me what is happening here
A little too generous with the White or Caucasiform Group. Reduce it just to the Nordic and Alpine Races.
It's a very strange phenomenon - race is apparently not real but also totally measurable in exact percentages in any person.
Just like the parroted talking point “a white person and a black person can have more genes in common than two white people” which is obviously nonsensical if thought about for three seconds.
I can tell you that anyone that has picked up a book on biology knows very well the differences
I urge you to-
Reddit kike glowfaggot
that is better. It is worth asking then what is best. How is this optimized? As it turns out natural language is a function of anatomy. Some people incorrectly believe they can learn a new language but they are not. They are actually just leaning new words as an extension of their natural language. This is the most intuitive way to understand ebonics. It is significant to note that ebonics is just the way all Africans sound, and all Africans always sound like Africans if you pay close enough attention.
The natural language method works as an optimization tool for identity because language is like an independent reference
Race being more than skin deep is literally one of the first things proven when DNA was discovered.
It just does not mean one is inherently better than the other.
Go talk to organ transplantation specialist and tell them race has nothing to do with it.
Reality is not like I. Your medical TV drama with the blood type being all that matters.
We check for more than 50 different markers in organ transplantation and still have issues with the organs getting rejected and having to take meds for the rest of the life to prevent rejection from or having to find a new donor organ like every 10 years.
I don't care about their skin color.
I get a dark tan every summer.
It's the content, or lack of , in their character that makes me see red
no one cares about skin color, but we all care about names.
I am a difference which makes a difference
We are the difference we make
There is another, don't remember what it was called.
Something like racial differentiation index.
Different race for wolves and dog with barely 100 points difference.
Blacks and whites nearly 2000 points difference, all the same race.
White people come from albinism and live in collective shame of it. A potemkin village tribe of apes who forsake their own ancestors for hubris.
iq map