is being ugly AND lazy a valid and justified reason to not believe in God?
Is being ugly AND lazy a valid and justified reason to not believe in God?
No. There's no just reason to disregard the Creator.
Consider that humans evolved to have religion; it's a pan human trait. Animals don't have religion.
It's not evolving to reject religion; it's devolving into a lower life form.
Yes
If your parents could make you look like whatever they want, they would make you look good because they love you
So why doesn't god?
That being said, you rarely see Animals doing things they shouldn't. I think even Animals have a primitive acknowledgement of Creator.
stupid kike. You have a hook nose as a warning to the faithful that you're toxic as hell.
you know this dude thinks he's voltaire reincarnated for sure
I thought Christnogs had a point on physiognomy, but then it turned out the infamous fedora guy was actually one of their own and had no idea why he was being called an atheist.
just becomes a variant of the problem of evil/suffering.
there are a gorillion theodicies and defenses, atheist intellectuals don't use the logical form of the argument anymore, but the emotional one is a big stumbling block for a lot of people.
one defense, especially when the argument's formulated like this is
"idk dude"
it's up to you to demonstrate the presence of [ugliness] and a loving God are logically incompatible
you do know dolphins masturbate
Young Aron Ra mogs everyone on Anon Babble.
Dolphins are much like us, burdened by sin through great intellect.
Mutt tradcaths like to talk about physical aesthetics while they hide their ugly faces behind pics of Greek/Roman statues and promote guys like Tim Pool, who has a beanie glued to his head because he's insecure about being a hairlet.
Generally speaking : yes
could've grown up to look like peter steele (catholic) if it weren't for atheism
Lazy, not but ugly - yes
If you are born ugly god hates you.
He was raised Christian and then tried out different religions before coming to the logical conclusion that all of them are bullshit.
the logical conclusion
what's his best #1 argument against Christianity?
Also I just looked it up. Peter Steele was an atheist, and then returned to Catholicism because he was a pussy who was afraid of death. I'm sure God won't know the different between genuine love and fear of the unknown.
he's based
if anti-theist and rationality rule the world, we probably have solved half of the worlds problem by now
I don't know. I usually just watch his videos about animals. Watch his debate with Kent Hovind. It's funny.
fuck i meant descartes. cause of the facial hair
It's impossible to be atheist and rational.
and yes,
christianity is a death cult.
cucktholics is a death cult.
mudslims is a death cult.
show your flag cuck
You are the cuck here. Retard.
If you don't worship the space kikes you will end up like this!!!
No thanks. You can shove your propaganda up your arse.
because he was a pussy who was afraid of death
baloney.
ascribing intents like this in any context is a shitty thing to do.
youtube.com
what's your best #1 argument against Christianity then?
belief is a choice
dogshit genetics at full display
show your flag cuck
He's brown. All the people here who LARP as crusaders are shitskins. Their only connection to White people is their kike religion, so they make it their whole personality.
If I can post on Anon Babble with VPN, I will choose the Israel flag.
belief in anything is a choice though.
there are other factors at play like evidence, reasoning, personal experience, and cognitive disposition, but ultimately it's up to you whether or not to accept a proposition.
belief in anything is a choice though.
I don't believe you and changing that is not matter of my will power
just try telling yourself you can fly and see how it goes, cretin
My whole personality is being the chosen ONE of God.
He's smart and knows bible better than 99 percent of christians or Jews.
So you attack his looks.
Classy. So the dude dresses like shit and likes to eat, big deal.
"Evolving"
looks like a fucking walrus
Peter looks too ogreish, alain delon mogs that walking refridgerator
just try telling yourself you can fly and see how it goes, cretin
i don't want to accept that proposition, because there is a defeater for that proposition.
i acknowledged other things come into play.
let's talk about an example where there isn't a defeater coming into play.
proposition: i have a blue cup of coffee on my desk.
the epistemic process would go something like this:
people often have cups of coffee on their desk when they're using their computer
blue is a very popular color
does anon have any reason to be lying? i'm not sure.
i will decide to give his claim about a 35% chance of being true, but intuition tells me he's lying for a reason i can't articulate, so i will choose to not believe him
do you need an ambulance?
No, it isn't, retard. If you're not convinced by the arguments for Christianity, you can't will yourself into believing. All you can do is lie about it, like all the Christians on Anon Babble who haven't attended church since they were children.
???
If you're not convinced by the arguments for Christianity, you can't will yourself into believing
you absolutely can and almost everyone does this.
there's even precedent in scripture in Mark 9:24.
there is literally nothing wrong with deciding to accept a proposition as true absent of a defeater. people do this constantly, even in matters outside religion. sometimes belief is about commitment, trust, or just choosing to live as if something were true. doesn't mean it's irrational, just means not everything rides on argument alone.
if I can fool myself, then I can fool God
You guys have more in common with Jews than you want to admit.
it's not "fooling" yourself unless the proposition is false.
i've asked you a few times in this thread to provide your or someone else's reasoning for why you choose to believe that Christianity is false and you've yet to be man enough to do so, despite repeating this implication.
it's not "fooling" yourself
It literally is, you retard. If you have to convince yourself to believe something, it means you don't actually believe in it. You're just brainwashing yourself. Pretending to believe in something simply because you want to believe in it until your brain can't tell the difference between the feeling and the performance, like a method actor.
His yt channel playlist for evolution, 'classification of life' is pretty good if you can get past his atheist sniping. At least until the very end when he goes into his "one race- human race" cope. But everything before that was actually pretty fascinating.
lol
I guess I am technically "atheist" too, but I don't call myself that. I normally like religious people. I never understood why he ranted about theists so much. But apparently his family was the batshitty type that substituted religious moral ardor for thinking.
Hes so abrasive towards religion though. Though in his defense, he seems mostly to be focused on culture war grifters. I can find a lot of things to like about the Christian way of life. But if someone comes at me thinking its about defending fundamentalism as literal, the chat is going to end quickly. Its tantamount to calling me an idiot, and I hate when retards like panhandlers try to con you.
If you have to convince yourself to believe something, it means you don't actually believe in it. You're just brainwashing yourself
"brainwashing" is just a histrionic pejorative.
the person convinced themselves to believe something and believed it, therefore they believe it.
this has no bearing on whether or not the proposition is true or false though.
say there's a person afraid of public speaking.
they convince themselves they can do it through practice and self-encouragement, eventually coming to genuinely believe in their ability.
similarly, someone might doubt Christianity at first but, through study, reflection, or personal experience, come to genuinely believe in it.
notice you've still yet to explain your reasoning for why you choose to believe Christianity is false.
at the end of the day, christcucks are not able to answer the ultimate questions.
why does god like foreskin so much? is he faggot?
what's the verifiable evidence that christianity (your specific version christcuckoldry not some other sect like cucktolics) is the true religion? they cant be all correct if they all claim they are the one true "church of god" are all theist retarded faggots?