CogSec Discussion

Anon Babble was always influenced by glowie operations, but it is getting really bad at this point.
So here is some quick tips:
Any headline, topic, thread ask yourself: What would groups gain from me agreeing/disagreeing.
Also ask yourself: Does this emotionalize me in some way so I waste time on the topic? Usually if a topic has 2 opposed(tribal) emotionalized positions which fight each other it is a timewaste. For example the war in Ukraine is actually happening and it has an actual purpose, but arguing either in favor of Hohols or Ziggers is absolute timewaste because Putin and his mafia friends wash their money in the City of London and thus belong to the western elites. The real purpose of the war is depopulation, testing tech on the modern battlefield(huge dataset for upcoming droneswarm AIs) and emptying the population on top of the eastern Ukraine resources so the mining operations in a few years can work in peace. Also obviously moneygrab: Transfer of taxmoney to cabal arms manufacturing companies and keeping you poorer by high energy bills.
Discuss.

psyops-patch.png - 485x470, 441.15K

Just sucked my first cock bros. Ask me anything.

Anon Babble was always influenced by glowie operations

it's the other way around

All police "organizations" are terrorist child rapist conglomerate hydra syndicates. Most cops are stupid as fuck high-school bullies who need free protection because they have a glass jaw.

wym influenced, there are irl glowniggers on this very forum?!

obviously, Hunter Biden Laptop for example was leaked here.
Hello Eglin Airforce Base
most Anon Babbletards are shabbos goy who carry water for the <current thing> by playing controlled opposition.

You're now manually breathing

Hello kike in Germany

no I read in another thread that this a glownigger free zone

Ask yourself if there has ever been any non zogged politician advertised on Anon Babble (Wayne and Ron Paul excluded).

every single Anon Babbletard is retarded, it's in the name.
Anon Babble as a collective however, is the result of the biggest mistake glowies ever made: giving schizos the access to the internet and normies' minds.

politician in itself is a zogged profession. You are not allowed to have influence if you don't play ball in that job. A glorified middle manager class below real hidden elites.
My grandpa kkkremated lots of kikes, I am of pure prussian-bavarian phenotype.
there are some good diamonds in this mud which usually get slid right off the catalog. The collective is controlled.

Whatever you say moshe

Usually if a topic has 2 opposed(tribal) emotionalized positions which fight each other it is a timewaste.

Also often nudebait is a tellsign for timewasting shit threads.
Purposely fucking with readers' lizard brains is pretty much that what one does not want in discussions.

This.

Unfortunately, there are generic threads and the ones artificially created to saw division or muddy the waters. Some get archived in minutes, some get to 300+ replies thanks to bots/shills.

yes true, though I remember more blacked threads 2-3 years ago. Nowadays it is almost zero racebait and nudebait is mostly asian/white cuties. Obviously all part of the remoralization of the white male for the upcoming wars.

More?
It was 30-50 active porn threads at the same time.

Yes, funny how that changed now, huh?
Enjoying comfy choccy milk rn btw, glowies seething.

Anons are operating in an information void.

Simple things like

Russians wash their money in London

Seem like they could be true but without forming our own intelligence agency we'll never know. We all know what happened to wikileaks.

Anons are left with simple rules of thumb which are certainly true. Your government is evil, other governments are probably also evil. Never serve the government, never die for the establishment that hates you. Simple but honestly it works for 99% of glowop counter intelligence.

They don't have the human resources right now to do this currently, due to war and shit like that but there are other systems in place to fuck shit up.

jidf, pls leave

there are some good diamonds in this mud which usually get slid right off the catalog. The collective is controlled.

Your mind is focused on this shithole, you don't understand what is going on.
What I told you has already happened, it's already done.
This place is irrelevant, it always was. it's a crash test site in the desert that nobody knows about. It's not what is happening here that is important, it's what is happening everywhere else.
I told you, schizos, internet and access to normies' minds.
There is no normie here.

If you dig into what I said you will find tons of sources for russian mafia washing through the City of London.

Wikileaks

Funny you mention that, because Wikileaks itself is not what it seems like. Wonder why Assange got flown to that bumfuck nowhere island with a US court? hint: EXIT NODE.
They have the resources at all times, they just changed the current agenda.

you are wrong, sorry.

90% of what you think is deliberate shilling is just people who spend all day on the computer and think the funniest thing in the world is being annoying for attention

glowies are high 1:4 to occult energies.

corporations 1:5

technology 1:3

government 1:4

design is one thing, the occult is another.

WWW invented by the eyes of CERN, their logo 666. not mark of beast but society's omens negater designed to draw people in to technology, sinful by default.

think occult is behind all society doings and civilisation and you'll be much stronger to recognise bullshit and laugh at muppets caught in the glow like short sighted moths flying to the flame.

Dig and you'll find

Except that I won't because media articles and public statements aren't primary sources.

Assange was flown...

Was he? did you read that somewhere online?

To know anything at all Anons would have to start digging into companies and their ownership structures to understand the upper level of the ice berg. Its not free but the investment is in the reach of groups of noobs. Could also get into some economic data to understand what entities are dependent on what other entities for inputs.

Anons lack a clear an accurate image of the world and its workings. No one gives enough of a fuck to solve that. So tap the sign and move on.

brit posting schizo word salad the second I mention Assange.
another brit playing dumb sheep.
Don't make me post the document you british fag. The americans dogwalked you.

Your government is evil, other governments are probably also evil.

How or why could the government as a whole have ill intent?
Maybe a more nuanced view would be helpful. If you sense state actors are going against you, it seems quite reasonable to expect the worst. Lever out the legal state through secrecy. Balanceing glowniggery and legal state is the issue here. It's not an easy one, i guess.

german faggot who needs his head cut off. give us your address, i wana eat your eyes and rape your mother. you lil cyber bitch.

following the manual real good here, keep antagonizing to derail the thread.
Assange - Exit Node - Genetic Pipeline

peepee to tha poopoo to tha muthafuckin niggerkike y'all

playing

? I'm not a sheep but I *am* dumb in that I know that the information necessary to act "intelligently" isn't available.

Don't make me

Post whatever the fuck you want.

schizo word salad...

gen-z hypocrite retard. except your outlook is baby tier knowledge.

Yeah you see you're setting off my glownigger alarm because you're insinuating that the government isn't irredeemably evil and that is the one thing of which we can be certain because we can see that their behaviour is totally consistent with this hypothesis.

oopsie

image

this is a good example, I don't know what the J... file is nor can I verify any of the information presented. Is it even still possible to find verifiable untampered copies of anything that was originally released?

The only reason we can have any confidence at all that JA was ever legit was that he was violently persecuted by the authorities. The general public doesn't know more.

you are basically the soijak asking for scientific evidence right now. Which either makes you a useful idiot or an actual glowie trying to damage control.

You have nothing to give me, if your image is of value to someone else supposedly fighting the good fight then I wish them every success. I'm just pointing out the ludicrous information and resource asymmetry between the public and the glowies. I've made my suggestion as to what would actually need to happen to fix that in order to even have a hope of understanding and thus sensibly responding to the world.

As it is I respond to the baudrillardian hellscape by acknowledging that I'm better off with a blindfold and raw logic than getting sucked into literally anything that I read.

So what you are saying is that you refuse any sort of cross reference while appealing to simple sheep logic to stay clueless. Gotcha, good luck with that.

What do you even mean by a cross reference? Two bullshit sources saying the same thing? Congratulations you're now about as accurate as wikipedia.

why not both? co-evolution.

Epstein blackmailed scientists in elite universities, Epstein blackmailed british royals(Prince Andrew etc.), Epsteins scientists used the Wikileaks exit node to run genetic stuff to China. This is all part of the plan to dispose certain old elites by associating them with the bioweapon, while having new elites offer the solutions.
For this reason dumbfuck british royals took the bioweapon injection and now get cancer. They were only aware of parts of the plan and thus got gamed into compromising themselves.

The main method of engagement by glowies on Anon Babble -- by which you can ALWAYS spot them with certainty -- is the "cognitive infiltration" method:

pushing a permutation of "generally accepted" views with a subversive theme inserted

favoring contrived debates over organic or logical ones

Alan Watt used to talk about Cass Sunstein and his book "nudge" all the time. He talked about public-private "behavioral insight teams" would do consulting work for governments and other entities to "nudge" the public towards prearranged policies and attitudes.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioural_Insights_Team
cognitive-liberty.online/cass-sunstein-cognitive-infiltration/

They daily flood the space with bullshit to cause people to not investigate claims that can be substantiated.

great replacement theory, that's something flat earthers talk about!

don't think mRNA vaccine is safe? you must not believe viruses exist!

think israelis planted explosive on 9-11? you must think the planes were holograms and the towers still exist!

Q Anon shit was another great example: The early 'calm before the storm' threads from late-2017 were cryptic, but people initially tried to relate them to specific people and events in a relatively direct manner. That changed over time, as Q-shit devolved into numerology and multi-year 'deltas' and vague accusations without direct evidence. I have even seen Q-fags unironically refer to time-travel.

In other words, the following epistemic model:

We will establish specific facts and timelines using documentary evidence, and will try to identify new facts using the evidence we have or the evidence we can obtain

Was replaced by the Q-shit model:

Holy shit, look at this vague list of cryptic statements! It might mean X/Y/Z! Holy shit; was George Bush Sr. EXECUTED? OMG guys; look at these strings of numbers!!! 6 gorillion sealed indictments!!! Secret tunnels!!! OMFG THE STORM IS HERE!!!!

This is their goal, for every topic

Their main goal is to simply over-burden and disable us, because we used to be capable of picrel, and that was their "code red"

hwndu.jpg - 3218x6418, 3.63M

The solution was always violence, everything else is just wasting time. You know it's true. You just don't want it to be your responsibility. I understand.

Here's your evidence bro.

basedsonnatty.png - 492x491, 257.87K

Its fairly obvious as well because they'll always insert something that its against your interests to follow.

One of the best questions an anon could possibly ask is

Is it in my interest to do X.

If its not, then don't do it.

Is it in my interest to do X.

this, at the very least; but even just to ask "whose interest" in general should be promoted