Pol btfo

this nigger does addition before multiplying

17.5?

30

The answer for any question on Anon Babble is either niggers or jews, in this case I pick jews.

10+5 x 2 = 20 maybe 30?

30

thats it
my eyes bad lol

Yes. There is only one whistle in the last line.

You're still probably missing another discrepancy in the pictures. I too noticed the whistle. But I have a feeling the shoes are different on one of the lines.

this

its 30

RETARD DETECTED
THERES NO WHISTLE ON THE CAT IN THE BOTTOM ROW
LOL FAIL
LOL DUMBASS

we can do math with actual numbers in the west not this heiroglypics shit

oh shit he's right

fucking gay details

No, it’s 16.5

The real answer is 16

Fun puzzle, very witty

16, nigger

16

Explaining this for retards.

Shoe =5(the pair is 10)
Cat =3(often seen with a whistle)
Whistle =2(the pair is 4)

If you said 26 your values were all correct but you did order of operations wrong. If you said 30 you counted the cat as 5 which is the value of a cat with a whistle and you also did order of operations wrong. If you said 60 you counted the cat as 5 and counted the whistle as though it was a pair and also did the order of operations wrong. 19 was both wrong values and did all operations as addition.

I will argue rhat a single shoe is worthless unless you are russian or ukranian (lmao) so its value would be zero if presented that way.

good point

22.5

nvm am blind

the cat isn't wearing a whistle in the last one

the cat was a whistle blower and the IDF took his whistle and his shoes

many such cases...

3x shoes = 30 therefore shoes = 10
10 + 2x cat = 20 therefore cat = 5
5 + 2xmeat = 13 therefore meat = 4
10 + 5 * 4 = 30
QED, EZ

dude it's in his pocket

funny enough tho, this is kind of how

luwian hieroglyphs

were written

the luwians of anatolia who lived around the same time and place as the hittites

c. 2200-1200/800 BC

were the first indo-european language speakers to make their own written language symbols - these developed independently from the egyptian ones and were used for cenuries

this is kind of how

>luwian hieroglyphs

were written

in the sense that, like the pic has the cool cat with the white, or without, it changes the appearance of the symbol but the concept is still related

its thirty
shoe=10
cat=5 (10+5+5)
5+x+x=13
or 2x=13-5
2x=8
x=8/2
x=4
10+(5*4)
10+20 = 30
bidmas

20.

There is only one whistle, not two.

It’s not 10+(5x4)
Youre close though
It’s 10+(2.5x2) since the last whistle is halved (only one whistle) and the cat is missing a whistle
So you halve the two incomplete pictures before you do the equation

10+(2.5x2)=15

30.
Remember PEMDAS

ah i wouldn't the cat having the whistle missing be incalculable, i suppose we must calculate the percentage missing from the cat from its size right to find the accurate division? ill do it right now i guess.

If you said 26 your values were all correct but you did order of operations wrong.

that means you were wrong

this
10+(5-2)x2

we must calculate the percentage missing from the cat from its size right to find the accurate division?

No.
incomplete picture (something missing etc) = you just half the value imo

The "One whistle" wasn't exactly categorized, but if using it for what it seems to imply, the answer is actually 20.

nah, you deduce the value of the wistle from the second and third equation

combined, of course

Why is the cat without a whistle 3?
Why is the cat 3 and the whistle 2?
Maybe the whistle is 3 and the cat is 2?
Or maybe the cat without a whistle is just 2.5

true enough but we do not know the value of ? (which is given now but earlier wasn't) , I would rate this exercise as bad for children. In real life the whistle wouldn't be half the value, forgive my autism.

If the value of the cat’s whistle is derived from the separate whistles, then we can safely assume the cat without a whistle is valued at 3. So it would then become 10+(3x2) making the answer 16.

If we assume the cat without a whistle has its value reduced by 50%, then the answer is 15.

The problem is that we are never given parameters under which to define the cat without a whistle and the rules are never explained, so we can only speculate.

In any case the answer is either 15 or 16.

think nigger if the wistle was 3 the third doesn't add up

Christ this picture is more fucked up each time I look at it.Alright, final answer time. Jesus fuck. I thought it was simple baby shit.

My final answer is 11. PEMDAS. I could be wrong. Whatever.

shoes == 10
furry == 5
whistles == 4
shoes(10) + furry(5) x whistle(2)
10 + (5 x 2)
10+10
20

even their simple math attempts to trick you

This is maximum chink.

Shoe is worth 10
Cat with whistle is worth 5
Cat without whistle is worth 3
One whistle is worth 2

10+10+10=30
10+5+5=20
5+4+4=13
10+3x2=16

I meant to say 16. Jesus God. FUCK

No I meant the cat without the whistle

shoes (10)
cat without whistle (3)
single whistle (2)

10+3x2
3x2=6+10=16

the answer is 16

for this exercise true, since the value has been revealed itt but I would say that the whistle is 4% ±1% of the value of the cat, so roughly 4.75 and 4.85, 4.8 so the answer would be 10+(4.8x2) or 19.6 if we round it since the answers preceding are in whole numbers. it would be 20.

Correct. Though my fractured brain takes time to absorb shit I do usually circle in on the right answer. Eventually. I mean I think you're right.

I don't think this is an excercise intended for children, I think you'd need at least a 120+ IQ to solve it in a reasonable ammount of time

let's se, going row by row we get
10 for a pair of shoes
5 for a dude with a single whistle
4 for a pair of whistles
last row becomes
10 for the shoes plus 3 (5 - 2 for a single whistle) times 2 = 16

It's 16. In true chinese fashion, they've removed a tiny whistle from the cat in the last row. You're looking at:
10 + 3 x 2
10 + (3*2) for anyone not brown

16. Remember, in china, being tricked means that you messed up and it is morally justified for someone to trick you. If you catch someone tricking you, then you are very smart and did a good job catching the trickster, you should feel happy that they attempted to trick you.

They are the most jewish asians.

this is it. as long as we’re allowed to assume the cat is wearing the same red whistle as the whistles valued at 2

If that was the intention behind the image creator (it probably was) then it’s 16 yea

Why would the cats value be reduced by 50% when we know how much a whistle is worth? Just subtract the whistle from the cat

the whistle is 4% ±1% of the value of the cat, so roughly 4.75 and 4.85, 4.8 so the answer would be 10+(4.8x2) or 19.6

Lmao they actually did it

you Abo, if the cat+whistle is 5 and you know for a fact that each whistle is worth 2 the fucking cat without the wistle has to be 3. I wish an Emo rapes the stupid out of you.

If we assume the cat without a whistle has its value reduced by 50%

why the hell would we assume that?

Maybe the whistle is 3 and the cat is 2?

no, if the whistle was 3 then second row would be 17

third row, sorry

The designer of the fucking image never specified whether or not the cat is wearing the same fucking whistle mate so I just had to assume the value was reduced by 50% since the guidelines and parameters for the study were never exactly established prior to conducting the experiment
Bro is really blaming me for not knowing what the fuck some math chink meant with the fucking cat whistle. Insane

Emu*

the true percentage has to be lower than 4 if the answer was rounded to 19. I knew the chinks threw that in somewhere.

Why the fuck would we not?
Where are the rules

why the hell would we assume that?

Why not? A cat with a whistle is worth twice as much as a regular cat.

38

I wish an Emo rapes the stupid out of you.

Emo

Kek

math + communism = works
lol

Deductive reasoning bru. The whistle by themselves look exactly like the whistle on the cat.

It's 30, you absolute retards.

10+(5x4)

because it's a simple addition, niggers
you have a cat plus a whistle
if you say a slice of pizza is worth 5 dollars and a slice bacon is worth 1 dollar then a slice of pizza with a slize of bacon on top is worth 6 dollars

(((memeflag)))

doesn't show his work

just gives you final bs equation without relating it to the picture

typiacal

So these are the "ubermensch" who will save the white race.

It’s not 30 you dumb nigger. Last problem has the cat missing a whistle and there is one whistle in the problem while the others had two.

ok so the value of the cat without whistle is 4.5.
the whistle takes up 10% of the entire cat.
so the finale answer definitively is
10+(4.5*2)
which is 19

deductive reasoning

using logic to infer things in a “simple math equation”

Mfw

4.5 is the point where we get a whole number if multiplied by 2 to the answer we need. Its as shrimple as that.