Reunification, Russonification

A strong Rusia is good for the world.

No, it’s not. Russia should be divided into multiple smaller states. The same goes for China. Heck, I’d like to see that happen to the US.

we should start with Scottish and Welsh independence

if EU would accept Russian membership

EU doesn’t accept membership from corrupt, unstable dictatorships.

putting sanctions on Russia for 30+ years straight

Maybe Russia shouldn’t have needlessly attacked it’s neighbours (Georgia in 2008, Crimea in 2014 etc).

Instead they opted for killing Russian minorities in Donbas

Russian propaganda. Ukraine has been fighting Russian backed separatists in Donbas, not civilians.

Neither Wales or Scotland want to leave the UK. Minorities in Russia and China would absolutely have their own states if they could.

I agree with your post, but both sides are at fault in this war. Igor Girkin Strelkov, former intelligence agent, sent his troops into currently occupied territories and held government buildings, illegally controlling those territories. Ukraine's fault was that they used huge ballistic weapons with a broad range. As a result, hundreds died from unintentional shellings. In my opinion, this war should end in stalemate, but what needs for it to be done, I'm not quite sure

Minorities in Russia and China would absolutely have their own states if they could.

and who would provide them with electricity, food, heat, etc?
You do know (hopefully) that Moscow loses a lot of money from having to subsidise 80% of Russia's territories

I have a friend from Scotland, and she wants independence from UK. Mind you that she's a zoomer (18+)

EU doesn’t accept membership from corrupt, unstable dictatorships.

cool so why is it trying to accept Ukraine into EU? It's the most corrupt country in modern history.

Maybe Russia shouldn’t have needlessly attacked it’s neighbours (Georgia in 2008, Crimea in 2014 etc).

Maybe NATO shouldn't have needlessly declared a roadmap plan to integrate these countries into NATO. (hint: Bucharest NATO summit in April 2008, before the Georgian war).

Russian propaganda. Ukraine has been fighting Russian backed separatists in Donbas, not civilians.

Sure, so these Ukrainian soldiers randomly shooting at civilian buildings and laughing is AI generated: x.com/ricwe123/status/1673686231064952834

that Moscow loses a lot of money from having to subsidise 80% of Russia's territories

They already raised tax for fuel. They can raise tax for other things to. And about money sinks, at moment three comes in mind: Kaliningrad, Chechnya and Crimea. Luganda and Donbawe will not count, as it is still warzone, and there are different criteria.

Kremlin ALREADY is in "money printer goes brrrr" mode. They can easily print more. They can easily live with ~40% inflation. For years. Issue at moment is that they do not have enough equipment and ziggers. They can relieve some stress by renting some troops from Best Korea. But base issue remains.

Wow, the EU is based

NATO is a defencive alliance that prevents countries from chimpout nations like Russia. Btw, ziggers could be in NATO after cold war but Putin went paranoid about muh natooo

Btw, ziggers could be in NATO after cold war but Putin went paranoid about muh natooo

It is more complicated. Soviet Union applied for NATO membership, and was declined. Then they created their own Warszaw Pact.
Russia was in talks about joining NATO, but never applied. Also, they created their own version, called CSTO. Very similar outcome as during Cold War. V.Putin did brief talk about joining NATO around 2000, and created CSTO in 2002.

That "NATO expansion is dangerous" thing became their slogan relatively recently. Baltics joined in 2004, and it was basically nothinburger for them. As here basically was DMZ zone, with very small national countries.

NATO is a defencive alliance that prevents countries from chimpout nations like Russia

members of NATO countries have been involved in more offensive wars than defensive wars. And this is a fact. You know this fact. You still continue to shitpost online though

Baltics mattered very little because Kaliningrad and Baltic Sea exist. In case of an open conflict between Russia and NATO, geographic realities imply Russia can take conrol over Baltics within a day. This is why NATO is sperging out 24/7 about the Suwalki Gap. It's their Achilles Heel

Yeah, NATO would invade Russia, which have ~6k nuclear warheads, and around ~10k tanks. Yeah, right.

Monke chimpout in Ukraine was because of natural resources Ukraine have. From security standpoint, they did not gave much fucks about NATO. But now are pissed, that a lot of NATO members provide Ukraine with weapons, because it was thing they did not expected. Because did not gave a fuck. And did not gave a fuck, because expected quick victory in Ukraine.

Even now, a lot of NATO members piss in their pants by being scared from Russia. Not willing to give some longer range weapons and similar.

EU doesn’t accept membership from corrupt, unstable dictatorships

Pfff

Romania

Ukraine

possible Turkey

Possible Serbia

...

geographic realities imply Russia can take conrol over Baltics within a day

Well, doubt. They THINK that they could do it. But in reality, their track record is not that good. But to build our defense strategy around that ziggers will be yet again incompetent, it is not really smart and sound one.

What?
Russia is like lowest lows of UK, US and China combined.
Thank God it's only 1% of world economy and cant influence shit.

Russia like 70% a wasteland not worth investing into, and that's not even taking into account population density, or the quality of the "people" living there. It's basically like Canada, 80% of the land worth living on is within 100 miles of the US border. If Russia wants more lucrative land it has to steal from Europe, chinks, or central Asians down south.

Russia actually wanted in EU.
But EU is a US glownigger project that aims to keep europe fucked up and weak.

Also the French and German buerocrats and their retarded ways would loose power.
Not to mention greater relevance to all slavic countries currently in EU.

I can already see Russia from my house

> possible Turkey

Turkey will not get in, as long as they have such high inflation. They do not qualify.
About Serbia, it is interesting, as some of existing countries could place some concessions from Serbia. Might happen, might not.
For Ukraine, there will be transition period for like a decade.

Imagine how russia would look if instead of staring a war they had used all that capital into infrastructure social services and education!

The same how it looks right now.
Russia has passed Germany and Japan by the more real GDP number, PPP.
Also, 92% of russians own their own homes, while Germany is bottom 3 in the world below even Africa.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_home_ownership_rate

Yeah, NATO would invade Russia, which have ~6k nuclear warheads, and around ~10k tanks. Yeah, right.

NATO already invaded Russia in Kursk region just last year. Whose tanks, missiles, satellite and military intelligence, mercenaries were there do you think? And who defended this invasion politically?

People who don't understand politics, geopolitics, deterrence - also don't understand war.
Here's a popular American military youtuber unapologically even walking around Kursk embedded into the Ukrainian units, walking on Russian corpses and making money from it:
youtube.com/watch?v=Ox9_V-APOGg

Here's US/UK spec ops admitting they were in Ukraine and what they learned from partaking in combat:
youtube.com/watch?v=Tge7YMi4gJs

So to answer your question, yes the west ALREADY invaded Russia. Many times actually. There's also "Ukrainian drones" flying from Finland and Estonia, hitting infrastructure in Leningrad region.

Russia has already passed Germany by all stats.
In fact, German companies such as BMW and SAP reps sit in russian top university cities to collect top russian graduates.

Why are so many people afraid of this?

i don't know and i don't care
people who disagree are welcome to form garrisons and field armies

Afganistan (70s), Iraq, Lybia, now Syria, were all secular regimes who kept thier muslim wack jobs in check. NATO exists to destroy countries and turn them in Mad Max hellscapes ruled by warlords who kill christians for sport.

NATO already invaded Russia in Kursk region just last year.

Yeah. Two years after ziggers were raiding ukie lands.

Bottom line is, that NATO was as threat for Soviet Union in early years. In past like 50 years, it was not.

There's also "Ukrainian drones" flying from Finland and Estonia, hitting infrastructure in Leningrad region.

Doubt that. It is as deflection because their anti air defense could not intercept those. Then they invented this bullshit. It is relatively harder to spot low flying drones with radars they have. Especially, when their AWACS was shot down, and they does not use them anymore.

It's in the past. I haven't seen any new wars led by nato occurring after 2020s, i think nato understood their mistakes, or i might be naive

cold war

Old dogs can't learn new tricks.

i think nato understood their mistakes

oh in that case!

Yeah. Two years after ziggers were raiding ukie lands.

this is not an argument and you should stop the mental gymnastics. Facts remain facts:
- NATO invaded Russia
- Russia didn't invade NATO

NEXT

Bottom line is, that NATO was as threat for Soviet Union in early years. In past like 50 years, it was not.

Sure, except that NATO-member states continued to fund terrorists, invade countries, built anti-missile systems and bases on or near Russian borders, while refusing to negotiate collective security with Russia.
I don't know if you take people for idiots, but most people know NATO remained an Anti-Russian organisation. There is virtually no reason for NATO to exist, if Russia doesn't exist.

Doubt that. It is as deflection because their anti air defense could not intercept those. Then they invented this bullshit. It is relatively harder to spot low flying drones with radars they have. Especially, when their AWACS was shot down, and they does not use them anymore.

What the fuck are you even talking about? Do you understand geography? Did you even open a map? Do you know where Leningrad region is? Protip: it's VERY far from Ukraine, and VERY close to Finland/Estonia

The US and Europe should have been building a strong partnership with Russia since the end of the Cold War to counter China’s rise but we blew it. In the early 2000s we were well on our way then everything went to shit. Trump is neutral on Russia but gets labeled as a “Russian asset” by Democrats in America because he doesn’t want to start ww3 with them like European governments want to do.

EU doesn’t accept membership from corrupt, unstable dictatorships.

Define western european kingdoms.

british , spanish , etc.

KINGDOMS

can you define those any other way than "corrupt unstable dictatorships"?
Ah, i see. those are Stable corrupt dictatorships, because kings pass their corrupt ruling to their sons . Got it.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchies_in_Europe

- NATO invaded Russia

- Russia didn't invade NATO

It was ukies who did raid in Kursk. Ukraine at lest for now are not part of NATO.

Sure, except that NATO-member states continued to fund terrorists

Nigga, zigga-stan did the same. There was even famous Wagner company created around those operations. Also famous that they successfully captured Rostov, basically without resistance. And later did "march of Justice" towards Moscow.

There is virtually no reason for NATO to exist, if Russia doesn't exist.

If would have collapsed in 15 years, if Monke did not chimped out. Now there are purpose for NATO again. Recently Sweden and Finland joined, as they seen that it is more beneficial to be INSIDE NATO than outside.

What the fuck are you even talking about? Do you understand geography?

Ah, you are one of those flat-earthers. Ok, never mind. Then to explain earth curvature and radar blind spots will be harder.

Why are you afraid of work, spainigger?

EU isn't perfect.
You build a better world not by starting out with perfection. You build it by fighting back the worst excesses of hell, one arduous step after another.
And looking back, we have come so far. The EU better than what we had 80 years ago, by FAR.

It was ukies who did raid in Kursk. Ukraine at lest for now are not part of NATO.

if so, why are they using NATO weapons, NATO money, NATO training, NATO mercinaries, NATO instructors, NATO programmers to calibrate the misisles and targetting, NATO satellites to identify targets?

You should probably realise quite fast in this disucssion, that all you're doing is mental gymnastics. It's "not nato" because "not officially nato". People are more intelligent on this board than you hoped.

Nigga, zigga-stan did the same. There was even famous Wagner company created around those operations. Also famous that they successfully captured Rostov, basically without resistance. And later did "march of Justice" towards Moscow

What? Wagner is Russia's Blackwater. I'm talking about terrorists, not about Private Military Companies.

If would have collapsed in 15 years, if Monke did not chimped out. Now there are purpose for NATO again. Recently Sweden and Finland joined, as they seen that it is more beneficial to be INSIDE NATO than outside.

it's called bribing and corruption

Ah, you are one of those flat-earthers. Ok, never mind. Then to explain earth curvature and radar blind spots will be harder.

I accept your defeat.

60% of their land is not even used u moron it belongs to bears

Wagner is Russia's Blackwater

cuckwater wished it was anything remotely similar to Wagner in terms of equip

EU is an alliance of US glowniggers European old money demons and parasitic buerocrats united in their ability to slowly bleed the poeple dry.

The most parasitic and subhuman poeple prosper in EU. Von derleyen is one example.

The whole point seems to be to keep individual states from purging their usles buerocrats and thus creating "instability" for the elites.

You live worse than your father and your kids if you manage to have any will live worse than you. Thats the current eu agenda.

All the money would have went to the pockets of jewish oligarchs anyway, war or no war

if so, why are they using NATO weapons

Because we gave them those. They have expressed will to join.
But they are not yet part of NATO. Otherwhise, there would be HIMARS rocket launches towards Russia, and we would had daily Iskander launches towards us.

I'm talking about terrorists, not about Private Military Companies.

They were operating in Africa and Afghanistan. It is open secret that bunch of blow-ups which sand people did against americans, was financed by Russia. As Russia was not happy that they were gaining stronghold next to Tajikistan. As tajikistan was important source for labor force in Russia.

it's called bribing and corruption

There is more to that. As there was very low mil spending among most EU/NATO countries. Like France or Germany. For Germany it was as bad, that more than half of their mil planes was in no combat condition. Due to lack of maintenance, spare parts and that some weapon system suppliers went bankrupt. For Germany and France, migrants was way higher priority. To get them housing, clothing and similar.

things that never happened:

Because we gave them those.

Yes, you had a choice of either helping kill Russians or not helping to kill Russians.
Your choice was to help kill Russians.
Russians took note of this. And now you are an enemy in their eyes.

They have expressed will to join.

Yes, and Russians have taken note of this too. This is why Russians view Ukraine as a legitimate enemy now, that will be destroyed.

But they are not yet part of NATO

De facto they are, because they receive more NATO weapons and money, than actual NATO members do.

Otherwhise, there would be HIMARS rocket launches towards Russia, and we would had daily Iskander launches towards us.

There are HIMARS rocket launches towards Russia. Quite a few Russian soldiers died in Kursk region because of it.

They were operating in Africa and Afghanistan

French soldiers, British soldiers, American soliders were operating in Africa and Afghanistan.

It is open secret that bunch of blow-ups which sand people did against americans, was financed by Russia.

US literally financed the creation of the Taliban though. And that's an actual terrorist organisation, not a PMC. Operation Cyclone - read it on wikipedia.

For Germany and France, migrants was way higher priority. To get them housing, clothing and similar.

It's not a priority, it's a corruption scheme. Same as is the entire Ukrainian war, which happened thanks to corrupt fucks in the west.

A strong Rusia is good for the world

lmao
You're like those leftist faggots who want to give government more power under assumption that givernment will be filled with competent, benelovent and just people. Except government isn't filled with competent, benelovent and just people and giving them more power is counterproductive.
There is a reason why no neighboring country want Russia to have any say in politics. It's because how Russia itself is ruled. Russia with its population, resources and technical culture inherited from soviet times could be powerhouse rivaling USA. But it isn't because all this potential is wasted on keeping up oligarchic, degenerate system. Look at people who emigrated to USA long time ago: they integrated and think of themselves as americans now. That's because USA in the past had softpower that made people want to be part of it. It's no longer the case, but Russia never offered such thing, nor does it offer it now. Russia expanding to your territory equals being managed the same way Russia is, and no one wants that as it means corruption even bigger than there already is, treating own people like cattle, stagnation in development and infrastructure besides couple biggest cities and goatfuckers on the streets. Meanwhile here they laid fiber internet in the smallest villages not to far from Polish-Belarussian border last year. If russian elites weren't the way they are, that country could easily replace USA with its resources, more competitive prices and closer culture.
Stop romanticizing gas station with nukes, which is what Russia is. There is plenty of things to admire in it, like nature, music, dilligence in upkeeping space technology and standards in universities etc, but it really isn't country that should have bigger say on global scale.
I wish for mass, global nuclear proliferation so they'd lose their 'muh nukes' argument.

Look at people who emigrated to USA long time ago: they integrated and think of themselves as americans now

Nigger, USA is a country by immigrants for immigrants. As for "integration" I don't know what you mean, but most people in New York can't speak English:

Your choice was to help kill Russians.

No, no. Not russians. Ziggers. There are difference. I have no issue with russians. I have issue with ziggers.

Yes, and Russians have taken note of this too.

That NATO thing for them was not as important as EU thing. NATO become relevant after 2014, and "krim nash" event.

This is why Russians view Ukraine as a legitimate enemy now,

And Baltics, Finland, Poland, Germany, UK, USA, and bunch of others except Hungary. Hungary is golden.

De facto they are

There is no "de facto NATO member". Such thing does not exist. Either you are in, or you are not.

There are HIMARS rocket launches towards Russia

But those are not from Baltics, or Poland or Finland. If Ukraine would be member of NATO, we would also bombed zigger weapon stockpiles. But we are not.

Quite a few Russian soldiers died in Kursk region because of it.

Not only russian. Also soldiers from Best Korea.

US literally financed the creation of the Taliban though.

It was saudi, but close enough. Later USA supported them, when Soviets did their campaign in Afghanistan (1979...1989).
Now Kremlin are in process of improving relations with Taliban even more. Not sure, is there opened afghan embassy in Russia yet. But if not, then will be in few next years.

It's not a priority, it's a corruption scheme

Nah. It is different thing. Migrants had VERY high priority. They switched away from them just recently.

No, no. Not russians. Ziggers. There are difference. I have no issue with russians. I have issue with ziggers.

"Ziggers" is your headcanon, you invented the term in your political fanfiction. But we all know what you mean by it: all Russians who dislike the west.

That NATO thing for them was not as important as EU thing. NATO become relevant after 2014, and "krim nash" event.

NATO and EU are virtually the same thing. You can deny this all you want, but reality tastes sour: almost all EU members are NATO members too. And this is not a coincidence. This is the law of the nature of politics. You cannot have a political/economic union without a military layer supporting it. Hence EU cannot exist without NATO, and NATO cannot exist without EU.

And Baltics, Finland, Poland, Germany, UK, USA, and bunch of others except Hungary. Hungary is golden.

Russia views NATO as an enemy, and all countries you mentioned are part of NATO. Hungary doesn't want to be in NATO anymore hence why it is "golden"

There is no "de facto NATO member". Such thing does not exist. Either you are in, or you are not.

"de facto" is not something NATO or you get to decide, it's a term that exists in legal logic. Something that is "de facto" is materially that, even if not on paper. And materially - Ukraine enjoys a lot of NATO materials (namely weapons)

But those are not from Baltics, or Poland or Finland.

HIMARS is from NATO
it's funny how you love to manipulate words.
In scenario A it is NATO unity and action, but in scenario B it is "not from this VERY SPECIFIC member of NATO".

Not only russian. Also soldiers from Best Korea.

And?

It was saudi, but close enough. Later USA supported them, when Soviets did their campaign in Afghanistan (1979...1989).

You genuinely argue like a woman. Did NATO fund creation of terrorists?
Yes. Loud yes.

Now, yeah. But the fact that USA is, as you've said, despite being country of mutts consisting of pioneers and immigrants managed to create some form of american identity, proves what I said. USA despite lacking natural, genetic glue that is actual nationality/shared ethnicity, natural cultural glue like shared history and religion, developed enough softpower by providing people opportunities to live decent lives that people did integrate and created american identity. You're talking about todays USA which is crumbling empire with no cards, with clown on the throne, overran by barbarians who do not integrate, which isn't even surprising because who the fuck want to integrate into shit that is better to be exploited than integrated into? American dream is dead and people are hedonistic, unhelathy degenerates even moreso then in the rest of the west.
So yeah, both Russia and USA are shit, but USA at least runs on fumes of its golden age which allowed better quality of life than Russia, and thus people aren't going to look at Russia with sympathy and hopes. If Russia wants other nations to respect it then it better starts respecting its own citizens first and doing something about improving their quality of life instead of sending them with no medevac possibility on fortified trenches in neighbor countries like they're some disposable fodder. But this of course won't happen because it would require replacing incompetent, corrupt, nepotistic elite, and it's elite who makes decisions. Elite won't remove itself for the benefit of the country because it is the way it is because it's selfish in the first place. Most people are as nature is opportunistic. That's why system matters as counterbalance for nature.

What a classic rusian subhuman monkey. " Rusia dindu nuffin!! We wuz kangz and shiee!!"

to summarize your wordsalad in a few sentences:
- america "we wuz great"
- russia never was good
- both american and russia are bad now
- but russia is still badder cuz war and shit (and bad quality of life or smth)

Reality check incoming:
- US is very young as a country compare to Russia or Europe in general. Yes USA had a golden age, it's over. Move along/
- Russia had many ups and downs in its long history, however, despite everything, it remained a major power for centuries, and Poland keeps seething about it
- If we'd be super honest, nobody in Europe or US or Poland gives a single flying fuck about how good or bad life is for an average Russian. This is not how human nature functions. You just use "quality of life" as a tool among many to attack your political adversary

" Rusia dindu nuffin!! We wuz kangz and shiee!!"

nobody said that, you probably need to go back to nigger tiktoks, this board is too complex for you

Anytime you see them addressing like 3 points with a paragraphs of "rusia dindu nuffin!! We wuz kangz and shiee" you know thats a well seasoned subhuman rusian

"Ziggers" is your headcanon, you invented the term in your political fanfiction

It was not me. It was some other clever guy on Anon Babble And I am grateful to him for that. It is such brilliant term. Fits perfectly. Especially after those toilet seat and washing machine looting events. Just brilliant.

NATO and EU are virtually the same thing

No, no. Different things. NATO is military alliance, EU are economic union. There are some overlap, as for EU there are Lisbon agreement, which also includes clause when one of member states gets attacked, other countries react. But EU does not include USA, UK and Canada. In a sense, way weaker military potential.

Hence EU cannot exist without NATO, and NATO cannot exist without EU.

No, they can. It is under question what will happen with NATO now, when D.Trump have ambitions in Canada and Greenland. And if USA withdrews from NATO.

Hungary doesn't want to be in NATO anymore hence why it is "golden"

No, no. They want. Otherwise they would initiate exiting procedure. As France did it in sixties.
In one of interviews, V.Orban said something along the lines, that he does not cares where Ukraine-Russia borders are, but he does not want direct borders with Russia.

HIMARS is from NATO

If it would be NATO-Russia war, then Baltics would be one of battlegrounds. Here in past 2 years arrived significant numbers of missile systems. At moment, we have what to launch at Russia, if they decide to chimp out. Not much, but there are munitions.
Thing is, that Russia also expanded their mil bases near our borders. Pulled a lot of anti air systems. Radars, and jamming equipment. Expanding warehouses. No tanks yet. But Russia also does not deploy their newly built T-90 to ukrainian front. They are stockpiling those somewhere deeper in Russia.
Instead of deploying Electronic Warfare systems near ukrainian borders, Kremlin decided to deploy those at Kaliningrad Oblast.

We all have to agree on one thing: rusians are subhuman monkeys. There is no way around it.

Yes. Russia was never good. Even at its technological relative peak when they were ahead of west for a brief time, their massive technological jump was at the cost of fucktons of lives of its own citizens and there was so much nonsense along with it that it ultimatelly collapsed. Not to mention technological power of Soviet Union was in part jumpstarted by landlease at the end of WWII with machining tools sent from US because it was in their interest to grind germans with russian lives, just like now they are grinding russians by throwing away ukrainian lives.
I have no idea why russians are the way they are, what is reason for this, but it's how they are in practice and I won't delude myself it's not the case.

If we'd be super honest, nobody in Europe or US or Poland gives a single flying fuck about how good or bad life is for an average Russian

Of course. Only some people can feel some sympathy for them, like me who have couple friends in there with who I play games. You miss the point though. The point is, we don't need to care about russian lives to not want to be ruled like russians are ruled. And expansion of Russia means exactly that. Most people don't give a fuck that majority of Russia is so poor they are willing to enlist despite knowledge of how Russia shits on its own soldiers. They just don't want to be in position of those tajiks and other russian peasants.
Your deflection won't change anything and won't solve underlying problem of why no one wants Russia to have any power, maybe with exception of USA which wants it only to use russians as cannon fodder again, this time against China.

It was not me

no shit, you're just a braindead monkey that follows dumb trends. What a surprise.

No, no. Different things

and then

But EU does not include USA, UK and Canada

So basically NATO and EU have same members, except 3 countries. Thanks for proving my point that they are the same thing.

No, they can

They "can" but they don't. No wonder you don't know what "de facto" means. You live in a world of possibilities rather than in a world of reality.

No, no. They want. Otherwise they would initiate exiting procedure.

Kinda weird that Hungary does everything NATO disagrees with.

If it would be NATO-Russia war, then Baltics would be one of battlegrounds

And NATO is preparing for it.
Did you already forget about Poland and Baltics buildings defensive walls and trenches on the border with Russia?

to summarize your wordsalad again: (but with interpretation)

Poland hates Russia for the same reason Venezuela hates USA. In fact, there is no fucking difference between all the hate USA receives from Latin America, and all the hate Russia receives from Eastern Europe.
You are the Latin America of Europe, with lots of "we wuz" energy as a cherry on top

The decline and fall of the Golden Horde has been a disaster for the human race. I will never forgive them for failing to end the Russian menace before it was born.

Yeah couldn't they invade the world like anglos did

Golden Horde WAS RUSSIANS.
Invented by you, brits, mongols, don't exist in reality (no mongolian DNA anywhere).
However, russians are home to 2 largest white Y DNA Haplogroups , R1a and R1b .
Somewhere 20K years ago in Siberia , Russia, where you brits invented "mongols".

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_R1a
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_R1b

Again, your deflection from problems of Russia and trying to ridicule Poland won't change a thing. It's not just Poland. Georgia, Ukraine, Chechenia in the past, no idea how many chechen loyalists are there now as Kadyrov clan probably tried to get rid of them. Even Lukashenko writhes like a weasel whenever he can. Or could because after protests and Russia saving his ass he probably has even less freedom of maneuvr than he had when he was trying to play on 2 pianos, talking with both Europe and Russia. Not to mention he did everything he could to not send his own troops into Ukraine, instead he just let russians ransack his ammo reserves. For perspective: bat'ka didn't send a single soldier while fucking norks did. What does it say about Belarussian-russian "brothership"?

no shit, you're just a braindead monkey that follows dumb trends.

kek
No, no. This particular trend is not dumb. It is BEAUTIFUL. It is as form of art. Pretty sure, creator of term "zigger" had soul of an artist.

Kinda weird that Hungary does everything NATO disagrees with.

V.Orban have his own agenda. And are trying to "milk" NATO, EU and Kremlin. So far, successfully.

Did you already forget about Poland and Baltics buildings defensive walls and trenches on the border with Russia?

Not sure about Poland. I know that in Latvia and Estonia, there will be wall and bunch of bunkers. No info about trenches.
Also, few weeks ago Baltics and Poland withdrew from anti-personel mine treaty. Now are 6 month grace period, when we cannot deploy or manufacture those. Meaning, that "window for opportunity" when Russia can invade with lower casualties, that window closes.
Baltics wanted to create "drone wall", and asked EU to finance part of that projects. EU rejected. According to rummors, it was because there was potential that migrants which Lukashenko sends to us, could be blown up by drones. And that is big no-no for EU. Now that project will have to be financed by our own budgets.

Russia has already passed Germany by all stats.

Gave me a good chuckle. You vatniggers never fail to deliver fresh cope.

Lukashenko's original plan from the 90s was to become the president of Russia. This is what the whole "Union State" project was about. He wanted to unite Belarus and Russia into a single system, and become the leader of both.
However, when Putin consolidated power in Russia, and came out to be practically more competent than Lukashenko in virtually every field, that was exactly when Lukashenko started playing the Coquette as he realised he can't challenge Putin for power directly, but at the same time will get assraped totally if he goes westwards.
In essence, Lukashenko's attempt to become the king of Russia was turned against him by Putin, and this is why they had a bickering-marriage until the 2020 attempt by the US to violate the Budapest Memorandum and overthrow Lukashenko. This is the moment when Luka accepted his fate as Putin's sidekick.

As for military commitment in the SMO, Belarus' army is quite small, and in Russia's long-term military planning, Belarus will be used against Baltics in case war breaks out with NATO. Belarus is positioned quite well for launching a Suwalki Gap operation, hence why its military should not be wasted in Ukraine. Where do you think Wagner moved its instructors after Progozhin's downfall? To Belarus.

thanks for confirming my posts

vatniggers

hello newperson

migrants which Lukashenko sends to us, could be blown up by drones

:)

hello newperson

I love that term, nigger. If you prefer, I could pull one of my country's own terms - pederus.

Yes Batu Khan does sound very slavic. Kek

I love that term, nigger

i'm sure you do!

Ok, pederus, if you prefer ours, provided it translates properly, I can even call you "ambreaj" (Cцeплeниe) - нижняя лeвaя пeдaль

all NAFO has left in their arsenal is insults, quite tragic

Ok

why would you ever feel the need to reaffirm it lol

NAFO

Those twatters really mindbroke you, didn't they.

mindbroke you

ironic

sorry I meant to say Anon Babble

Khan is a military title, like a General.

Lukashenko's original plan from the 90s was to become the president of Russia

I wouldn't be surprised if that was the case.

Where do you think Wagner moved its instructors after Progozhin's downfall? To Belarus.

As far as I know remnants of Wagner are still in Ukraine but in Vetern Division or however it's now called, under russian MOD. In any case, instrumental use of belarussian troops in a war they might not be interested in is perfect example of what I've been saying. In this matter Russia isn't better than US which plays with ukrainian lives.

You don't even know wtf you're taking about, spic.