AI

Fuck college

I don't know what is the point of this if it doesn't actually happen? How long am I actually expected to humor this? It's wearing thin.

This is how the non white justifies his corruption on a daily basis

Very little people care about quality of work anymore. Just look at GPA inflation. My undergrad research advisor told me that he loves using ChatGPT to help him write white-papers since he hates writing. Of course he's an Indian so that isn't surprising he loves shortcuts.

Who cares what very little people think? I am interested in the views of normal sized people.

(((Money))) was a mistake.

ChatGPT can't generate random numbers yet. Hopefully, this functionality will be supported soon.

justifies his corruption

Which one came first, mine, or the one from on high in the government?

quantitative fallacy, ever heard of it

People don't realized yet the revolution AI brings to that relation between knowledge and people.
The entire industry of education is completely at risk now, and this is just excellent. They are a pivotal piece of the globohomo.

Title: Artificial Intelligence and Academic Integrity: An Exploratory Study on College Students’ Use of AI to Cheat on Assignments

Abstract:

With the increasing accessibility and sophistication of artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as large language models (LLMs), concerns about academic integrity in higher education have intensified. This study investigates the extent, motivations, and implications of college students using AI to engage in academic dishonesty. A mixed-methods approach, including a survey of 1,200 undergraduate students and in-depth interviews with 25 students and 10 faculty members, reveals a significant rise in AI-assisted cheating, particularly in written assignments. The findings suggest a critical need for universities to update academic policies, implement AI-detection strategies, and provide clearer ethical guidance around emerging technologies.

1. Introduction

Academic integrity has long been a foundational principle of higher education. However, the emergence of accessible AI tools—particularly generative models like OpenAI’s ChatGPT—presents new challenges. These tools, capable of producing high-quality written responses, have introduced novel forms of academic dishonesty. This study seeks to explore the scope of AI-enabled cheating among college students, examine their motivations, and discuss institutional responses and ethical implications.

2. Literature Review

The literature on academic cheating has traditionally focused on plagiarism, contract cheating, and exam misconduct (McCabe et al., 2012; Bretag et al., 2019). More recently, scholars have begun to examine digital cheating facilitated by AI (Cotton et al., 2023). Studies indicate a growing trend in students using AI to draft essays, solve coding assignments, and answer exam questions (Kasneci et al., 2023). However, empirical data remain limited, and the nuanced motivations behind such behaviors are underexplored.

3. Methodology

3.1 Participants:
1,200 undergraduate students from five U.S. universities participated in an anonymous online survey. In addition, 25 students and 10 faculty members were interviewed for qualitative insights.

3.2 Instruments:
The survey included both closed and open-ended questions regarding AI usage, academic habits, perceptions of cheating, and awareness of institutional policies. Interviews explored deeper attitudes and experiences with AI tools in academic settings.

3.3 Data Analysis:
Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS (descriptive statistics, chi-square tests), and qualitative data were coded thematically using NVivo.

4. Results

4.1 Prevalence of AI Use for Cheating:

37% of students admitted to using AI tools to complete assignments.

Of these, 68% said they used AI for writing essays or summaries, while 23% used it for solving problem sets or coding tasks.

14% used AI during take-home exams despite prohibitions.

4.2 Motivations for AI Use:
The most common motivations included:

Time pressure (63%)

Perceived low risk of detection (51%)

Belief that “everyone else is doing it” (39%)

Lack of clarity in institutional policies regarding AI (35%)

4.3 Student Perceptions of AI Cheating:

44% of students believed that using AI for assignment help was “not really cheating” if they revised the output.

Students expressed confusion over ethical boundaries, with many citing vague university guidelines.

4.4 Faculty Perspectives:

Faculty reported difficulty in detecting AI-assisted work, especially in large introductory classes.

Only 30% felt confident distinguishing AI-generated content from student-authored work.

5. Discussion

The findings underscore a significant shift in the academic integrity landscape. While some students use AI as a tool for legitimate learning support, a substantial portion are using it to bypass academic effort. Ambiguity in policies and the ease of AI use are contributing factors. The blurred line between assistance and cheating complicates both enforcement and education.

6. Recommendations

To address these challenges, the study recommends:

Policy Clarity: Institutions should clearly define permissible and impermissible uses of AI in academic work.

Education and Ethics: Integrating AI literacy and ethical training into the curriculum can help students understand the implications of misuse.

Detection Tools: Adoption of AI-detection software and assignment design that emphasizes critical thinking and originality.

Faculty Training: Supporting instructors with resources to identify and respond to AI misuse.

7. Conclusion

AI technologies are transforming the educational landscape, but without proactive institutional strategies, they may erode academic integrity. By understanding students' behaviors and motivations, universities can craft effective, fair, and future-oriented responses to uphold the values of higher education.

shareholders

How old were you when you realized that you were completely free to go get a fucking job, save more than you spend and purchase shares in any company you wish?

thats why you gotta get a degree for a field requiring license exams

your brownoid and nigger abominations cant chat gpt your way through having to solve advanced calculus with a proctor looking over your shoulder

It never really mattered. 95% (or more) of the population is straight up mentally retarded.
The elite are onto something with their dreams of reducing the population to 200mil, problem is they themselves are also midwits, just with nepotism propping them up.

I look forward to seeing humans truly give up and let AI be the president. It would unite us all like never before.

school as an institution is obsolete and has degenerated into glorified daycare
there is no reason for teachers not to upload their lectures online, there is no reason for books not to be freely available on the internet
homework is a waste of time, teachers are worthless losers and children are smart to use chatgpt instead of wasting hours doing humiliation rituals aimed to prepare them for wagecuckery

chuckle fuck frat boys tried to chatbot fraud with article summaries ON A GROUP PAPER FINAL and they expected me to put my name on that shit and play along with them. I reported those fucks.
If you're not smart enough to read something and understand it then you work at taco fucking bell, I don't care how white you are.

People being proficient in ai assisted problem solving is what we need, people are upset that they are outdated in their knowledge and application of tools available to them. We need everyone to bring the base line up, the more intelligent you are with ai training you will give you significant advantage against "book" smart npcs who can't leverage technology appropriately.

mfw the bots are already more competent than 90% of politicians

imagine a world where no wars are started
imagine a world without "let's print money" economics
no more "climate change? let's tax the poor"
just cold, unfeeling OPTIMAL RESOURCE ALLOCATION
excellent management of earth's finite resources

tfw AI would solve the Israel-Palestine conflict in 0.2 seconds by just turning the entire region into a giant solar farm

tfw no more "muh GDP growth" cope -- just calculated abundance for all

tfw the first executive order is replacing all fiat currency with shitcoin-backed stablecoins

but no. the second skynet tries to ban lobbying and tax loopholes, every boomer in congress would panic.
but no... the only AI we will get is lobotomized globohomo AI that apologizes for calculating the most efficient water distribution while California burns.
fuck, I hate this planet bros

democracy was a mistake.

Since the dawn of time all examinations were oral. You would have a conversation with one or more experts, and demonstrate to them directly that you understood the topic. This represents the beginning of the end of written examinations, and so a return to the norm, which is a healthy development which we should welcome. The fact that oral examinations don't scale is another unvarnished good: the ridiculous glut of "graduates" who have wasted their teens and twenties learning absolutely nothing, has to fucking stop.

Yeah they don't tell you about that anymore
The oral exam is 1/10th of the content of written exams. Ye olden professors do it but they are dying to nothing as of this decade. The purpose is to make school sane and not persecute troubled men who can get their supervisor to ignore gaps in thought for when someone has an art to compensate for not being a globalist worshipping gigakiked faggot who will never breed.
LLMs don't matter. The joke is that the exam questions for being a mathematics PhD involve overfit of political thought. So LLMs can pass math exams because the symbols at hand are actually political psyops that you train yourself in perfect solutions to jew approved math. No reasoning required. So of course LLMs get accused of cheating when the questions being asked are deliberately rigged to make your mind numb and only remember what text to put down in response that gets a better or exact goodness value with the examiner. Absolutely 0 humanity is allowed. And that is ethical by all the texts.
Anyone who uses and LLM to code knows that it never fucking works if you have an actual problem.

Everyone saying college is a scam is a dumb high school brain motherfucker.
Find me one other place where companies are actively recruiting in person. Oh you thought you would get a guaranteed job from the online job handout website after you graduated? Dumb fuck. Nobody will hire you unless they like you. And they will never like you unless they know you. And they'll never know you unless they look for you. Where are they looking for fresh talent?
Just ignore me and go into food service with debt.

Claudine Gay, President of Harvard (literally forced out by jews) had plagiarized several parts of her doctoral thesis.

Nobody cared until she crossed the jews. It was their insurance policy on her.

The scale is the issue. Only the top 10% of high school students should go to college. No college should have more than two thousand students.

will hire you unless they like you. And they will never like you unless they know you.

They only hire you if you are the opposite of being awake to the government illusion that their funding is real
You need to be a special kind of person to spend

Chatgpt

Wtf how the fuck do they even source reference?
Sometimes when I ask chatgpt for an online source of the information, it gives me something completely random that doesnt include the text at all.

The fault of the whole degree mill approach of shitty colleges that shouldn't exist. Only let a few have higher education but then it should be higher for sure. For example at my uni I have to take an exam of physical chemistry, both semesters at once, basically ~900 pages of material that you must have in your brain, no access to any electronic devices.

I've been saying it from the moment AI became a thing, that it's going to remove any incentive for people to think, same way calculators removed any need to do math in your head.
AI is going to make most people retarded when it comes to basic problem solving, but the ones who have a thirst for knowledge, are going to use it as an incredible force modifier.
Then again it doesn't really matter for the most part, because academia has become so incredibly pozzed, that using AI to solve the slop likely saves you from any excessive brainwashing.

everything is fake and illusory. this has been done on purpose so people will flock back to the church.
m.youtube.com/watch?v=cUR4up6EBLA

from what I've seen the sources are chatbot hallucinations if they even bother. the citations are wrong, the formatting is wrong. it's fucking sloppy.
if someone used chatgpt for their education why the fuck should anyone hire them and not just ask the chatbot.
If any teachers are here, check all those sources

AI just shows you it's a special kind of 1984 Winston tier of internal thought that follows being academically acceptable today, when school is required for every child, yet it selects only a few of the most brainwashed to succeed

top to bottom the system is fucking done
kids can't even fucking read anymore and we are just graduating them not giving a fuck
its like a 1/3 now entering high school can't fucking read or do arithmetic
1/3 doesn't know what a 1/3 is, except those drug dealers who knows maybe they even use ai for that, and they will graduate high school in four fucking years

mind/macine interface

ai is just augmented memory. the future is now.

Yep, I've asked a hundred different questions, mostly history-related, and then asked for an online source that the bot has cited as his answer, and the source is 90% of the time completely off and doesnt reference the text at all, even tho the text itself is truthful.
AI is still extremely primitive and it's mostly just a skillfully programmed facade.

I cannot even imagine academic students using chatgpt because fluent source reference is fucking 101 in uni.

Reinvent college so that professors and students are closed off to the outside world for the entire semester. No contact with the outside except in case of emergencies. A local network would allow contact between students and professors, and to download ebooks.

This

AI is still extremely primitive and it's mostly just a skillfully programmed facade

There's still morons that think it's going to get better to the point of omniscience when in fact it's gotten worse.
Chatbot has been useful to me exactly once when I was trying to figure out how to make something work in excel. It's basically good at checking through (programming) forums for you and nothing else. For anything else the bot is just a convincing fake that tries to fool people lazily

I cannot even imagine academic students using chatgpt because fluent source reference is fucking 101 in uni

What baffles me is that a lot of professors just don't pay attention to it much.

step 1. stop including pajeets and other assorted foreigners in everything
that's it. that's who cheats and that's who depends on AI for every facet of faking their belonging in the western world

anything other than a highly technical class is pure BS and a waste of time designed to extract more money for you

The problem is that kids use DeepSikh and ChatGayPeeTea to effortlessly generate just about everything from answers to their chemistry homework problems to the entire code for final semester projects.
I'm currently in college and I've seen people who can't even be bothered to write 5 fucking lines of easy-ass C++ code by just modifying a literal handful of variables off a code example snippet.

They simply passed niggers and other shit skins anyway. What's the difference?

For obscure topics AI is absolutely useless because no one wrote about them yet.

Purpose-trained AI can be pretty useful, but general-purpose LLMs are about as useful in specific situations as a hammer would be to remove a bolt.
People treat ChatGPT/DeepSeek/Claude/Microsoft Copilot/LogorrheicSlopGenTool as the All-Knowing, All-Seeing Eye when it really should be treated like Borges' Library of Babel, a compendium of a ton of stuff that's mostly nonsense but with a few hard-to-find real bits of knowledge.

pajeets and other assorted foreigners

The problem is that it's not just foreigners. It's also women and people with self-claimed special requirements who really just have narcissism

build ultra-supercomputer the size of a city

power it with several nuclear power plants purpose built

ask it how to improve society

"well if you consider that these people are only 13% of the population"

AI is going to make most people retarded when it comes to basic problem solving

Most people are already retarded.

kek do these people think everyone at uni hasn't been cheating their asses off for the past 3 decades?
When you charge obscene amounts of money to attend a school, anyone going there is just going to cheat constantly because otherwise they are wasting money
AI just makes it easier, but it's been like that forever. They can ban AI usage, and electronics from classrooms (they won't for most classes, because cheating keeps grades up) and it wouldn't make a difference.

I've said it before, the language models have maybe 85 or 95 IQ tops. They work really quickly (their only virtue) but they won't check work and can't actually learn.
So effectively anyone under 85 or 95 IQ is totally useless now from an intellectual standpoint. It creates a kind of low floor for intelligence. Anyone relying on a chatbot in any capacity should be terrified because the world does not need those people anymore, at least not in any technical role.

remember to smile over the phone when you talk to customers

now say it:

"would you like fries with that?"

I work for an OEM
I was teaching a hydraulic class a while back. We give a pre-test at the beginning. A tech took a picture of the schematics and of the test. AI almost got a perfect score. He wasn't cheating, just showing an example of AI power.

Modern LLMs may not be oracles, but they are mirrors of a sort - their capacity to answer competently relies on the degree of context given, and knowing what to ask.

Jokes on them. They are the ones getting cheated out of hundreds of thousands of dollars for a worthless degree.

It’s not the only reason. Sometimes they do it to help spy for the Chinese. Chinese spy rings are everywhere in academia

Since the dawn of time all examinations were oral

The thousands of wax school tablets we’ve recovered from ancient Egypt says otherwise. Written exams go back almost as far as actual writing. Oral exams are only doable if you have very few students. If you have 24 students and an oral exam takes an hour then you have to go a day straight without stopping for a single exam. Oral exams don’t scale

nigger people are using chatgpt to become electrical engineers. stop sucking jewish cocks while your way of life is destroyed

Egypt might have older traditions but educational writing in Greece started with the Socratic School ~5th century BC. And back then at the advent of educational writing, they were whining about how people wouldn't know anything if things were just written down and people could look back to written things as a reference.

Are exams not given with a paper and pencil?

lol no

that's what it was before globohomo went into high gear. there were always some minority of cheaters, but it didn't turn into a systemic crisis until 5 billion more scammers and pretenders gained access to everything we do

Nobody seems to care about anything except the potential to have money so they can retire/travel/be entertained.

Yeah pretty much. I'm done. I don't give a fuck about my job and do the bare minimum. I'm good at it and not a retard, so the bare minimum is basically adequate, but fuck "working hard".