Funny how ‘black-skinned’ Mesolithic Europeans didn’t cancel out the light skin genes of Neolithic farmers...

Funny how ‘black-skinned’ Mesolithic Europeans didn’t cancel out the light skin genes of Neolithic farmers. It’s almost like they weren’t black to begin with.

black skin comes from an entirely different species that contributes to the African genetic pool. this is a total lie and one of those things that will be mocked 100 years from now.

Absolute fucking bullshit
/bred

If they didn't turn black later would they be here
Cite Mesopotamia @destiny

We wuz?

You realize the creator of that statue or whatever purposefully made it dark skinned, yes

White bros we waz black n sheeeeeeit glory be!!!!!!!!!!!1

100%

20 more minutes and its ready

They still running with the out of Africa theory

black people built Stonehenge

Europeans having darker skin tones many thousands of years ago does not make "Cheddar Man" into an African. It is being spun as such by "diversity" advocates however. And he likely resembled this rather than the bust in the OP.

They lived outside and the sun does that

‘black-skinned’ Mesolithic Europeans

Were they fuck black skinned it was fuckin dirt.

i thought the model that was created in this pic was done by a artist or smth. this study is old i think, "most europeans" is probably not refering to the yamnaya as well

Made non-white by researchers for diversity reasons. They were paid to do it.

80% of blacks and even middle easterners in norway fail to get enough vitamin D. Inuits have to eat shit tons of unhealthy animal organs to have healthy D levels because they are brown. Dark skin is the primary reason for this. While it wont kill you it will 100% impede your life and ability to reproduce and thrive successfully that the idea that there were people this dark surviving in europe for thousands of years is laughable

The black obsession didn't go full ham until 2020, catholics jews and muslims are totally gay for it.

Kek.
Leave the niggers with their own history of hitting a rock with a stick for 20000 years.

black people

built

Pick one.
They're probably the ones who fucked it all up.

fake news

misinfo1.jpg - 800x5700, 817.03K

Spring is starting here and I already miss the Winter

t. white person with male genitalia

DSCN7652.jpg - 3264x2448, 1.57M

we wuz everyone

why are they like this?

Yemeni-Jews.jpg - 1478x1050, 1.08M

This is obviously fake as fuck lol

Hee hee. What an messy mistake

Because their history is the moist laughably stupid in the history of Earth.
Modern Africa looks just like prehistoric Africa just with AIDS.

Would otzi still be depicted as white had he be found today and not the 90s, even that bog bro found in the uk was only dark because he spent 10k years in the dirt

i thought the model that was created in this pic was done by a artist or smth

Of course it was. It's one person's interpretation.

"most europeans" is probably not refering to the yamnaya as well

It's referring to Western Hunter Gatherers.

COOL WERE JUST MAKING SHIT UP AGAIN NOW, HELLO MY FELLOW ETHIOPIAN ARYAN KANGS, HOW DO YOU DO

post a link. let me see the name of this (((author)))

not if the jews have any say in it

It's more likely that they bred with the local neanderthals and by the time they got to britain and places like that, they were already white. There is so little sun in europe especially up north that with dark skin you'd get some bone deformity because of the lack of vitamin D.

800wm.jpg - 571x800, 77.82K

Just a little Yakubian trickery.

out of what, swisher sweets wrappers / empty 40 ozers of King Cobra and Night Train

No isn't, but the question is tricky, I don't think is the color of the skin but the gene itself, is like it just wishes to be swaped once in a while or self destructs

No melatonon organism live in caves away from sunlight for a reason, a selective breeding of it generates less sun light tolerance in the modern world of the custom stage light you use one meter from your face

The notion that Europeans had darker skin tones many thousands of years in the past really isn't an extraordinary claim. The only reason this story has generated so much attention is due to the artist choosing to make the bust look like an Aboriginal.
Tanning doesn't alter DNA. And to be clear none of the scientists suggested he was African.

Africans have the least neanderthal dna, many have none, europeans and asians have 1-2-3% asians have a little more

up to 94%, who were already mixed with anatolian farmers, were wiped out by disease when the steppe people (us) arrived about 4000 years ago
certain traits, namely blue eyes, were aggressively selected for
they're still our ancestors, and we're still more related to them than any shitskins coming to europe, but they constitute a minority of our ancestry

No isn't, but the question is tricky, I don't think is the color of the skin but the gene itself, is like it just wishes to be swaped once in a while or self destructs

And here we go

i think mostly the women dna, no? we have mostly yamnaya male dna, right?

Reminder all Pop Sci garbage is fake and exists to be propaganda.

there were some in southern europe, like the epirote greeks, but there's no evidence of any in northern europe at all.

That means I can say the nigger word

africans have a long history of mixing and conquering other peoples

thats all the genetic diversity in the world right there

how did we go from this? to this?

all because a bunch of people decided there was no choice but to eat each other?

i swear the entirety of my existence is nothing but why? and how come they

in the west we descend from corded ware people who are themselves descended from the yamnaya
the impact of ydna is relatively low compared to the whole genome from which the source, i.e. male or female, doesn't matter
the dominance of steppe people in europe is mostly due to disease, likely airborne yersinia pestis, and not mass rape like in the subcontinent

you have it backwards, their impact on the Y-DNA was bigger than their autosomal impact especially in west Europe where there was a nearly 100% replacement with steppe Y-DNA(R1b-L51) but by the time they got to Iberia they were only 25% WSH
disease cannot explain this alone

I do find it strange that ANF basal derived populations were so light skinned despite being relatively "Levant" shifted (and almost pure EEFs like Sardinians are relatively dark) but WSH were relatively dark though now the highest mixed populations are the lightest skinned.

in britain the anatolian farmers, who had mixed with western hunter-gatherers were reduced to about 6% of the population
it's a different situation in other countries, and significantly different in southern europe where anatolian farmers fared better

i admit i have a parochial view on this by being english
southern europe is another discussion to which i can't give you any insight

To be honest, I'm a bit thick. Can you explain this bit, lad?

when steppe people (us) arrived in europe, we brought airborne yersinia pestis (the same bacteria responsible for the black death, but missing a few mutations) which decimated the previous population
this cleared space for us to start farming, copying the anatolian farmers who today constitute 6% of your ancestry
anatolian farmers received blue eyes from western hunter-gatherers before passing them down to us

wait blonde hair had nothing to do with the eyes? we got the blue eyes from whg, where did we get the blonde hair from? insane that both rare feautures mixed with together, creating a unique combination with unique euro phenotypes

the jews do not have any say in it

blonde hair (and light skin) came from eastern hunter-gatherers
the anatolian farmers themselves were lighter than the western hunter-gatherers

thats insane, what are the chances that these types of people merge together, creating a race with unique eye, hair and face structures

Would otzi still be depicted as white had he be found today and not the 90s

Pretty sure I've seen people trying to claim he was a swarthy fucker too, even though he's most similar to Sardinians.

You're using 'we', 'you', and 'us' so interchangeably that you made me poo my mom's knickers.

I'm going to back Anon Babble

It's more likely that they bred with the local neanderthals

Mesolithic hunter gatherers didn't. Neanderthals were long gone by the the time of the Mesolithic. Their ancestors mixed with them though.

pretty unlikely, but now we're throwing away this unique ancestry to become brown mutants

they're all used correctly thoughalbeit

there's also no evidence of neanderthals hybridising with our ancestors in europe
we know some of the first humans in europe did, but their lineage is extinct

They were not black. they just had a permanent tan, like a greek or italian in the summer.

we indeed wuz, mah swedenigga, we WUZ

where did we get the blonde hair from?

As the other anon said, from Eastern Hunter Gatheres (EHG)
They got it from their Paleolithic (specifically late ice age) ancestors, the Ancient North Eurasians (ANE).
So far as I know, the oldest known person to carry the gene that creates blonde hair was an ANE woman, from Siberia.

there's also no evidence of neanderthals hybridising with our ancestors in europe

Yeah I'd heard something similar. Didn't that happen in the Middle East instead?

we know some of the first humans in europe did, but their lineage is extinct

Do you mean people like Zlatu kun woman?

you are closer to 40% EEF, not 6% lol
at best maybe 6% british EEF

Blond hair gene originated in the Ancient North Eurasians, who the Eastern Hunter Gatherers correctly mentioned. ANE --> EHG --> WSH --> Yamnaya, Corded Ware. The ANEs had overhwlemingly dark hair and eyes, the blond mutation in some of them didn't lead to lots of blond people like you see in Northern Europe today for a very very long time, after lots of sexual selection. Even the WSHs were mostly pretty dark haired. And yeah blue eyes are from WHGs. Our ANE ancestry is where we get our R YDNA haplogroups from ultimately, which is a sibling clade of Q, which is found in other ANE descended peoples - some Siberian and Native American peoples. Interestingly, there are some strong parallels between some Indo-European myth and Siberian and Native American ones - World Tree cosmology (Norse Yggdrasil etc), underworld being guarded by a big dog(s) (Norse Freki, Greek Cerberus). Look up Survive the Jive channel on youtube video called "The World Tree that grows from Hell" for more info on this.

there's no blond hair gene, it's highly polygenic unlike blue eyes, what you can say is that some of the known alleles were from ANE, but overall they probably weren't blonde; hirisplex(which must be taken with a grain of salt) predicts some blondes among ANF

British and Irish skeletons from the Bronze Age that followed the Beaker period had at most around 10 percent ancestry from the first farmers of these islands, with the other 90 percent from people like those associated with the Bell Beaker culture in the Netherlands.

Reminder that the faggots in (((academia))) hate that chuds know more about archaeogenetics than the average 'professional' does.

yeah, but the Beakers had already a lot of EEF from the continent, Yamnaya/CWC didn't migrate straight into Britain as 100% WSH lol

Listen kids, white people are magical beings with no past and no history who managed to colonize nearly the entire globe and for that we are very sorry. Trust the science.

A I dream.png - 606x606, 513.04K

The humans (of today) that came from africa did interbreed with local neanderthals. Even dna tests show it, when they came the neanderthals were still present.

We likely did come from africa, because except for the pale skin we are built for hot weather. We need clothes or warm shelter in europe otherwise we wouldn't survive. Sweating is actually bad in cold weather, but very useful in hot weather. Endurance running in cold is hard, but we are endurance hunters.

White skin has probably evolved a lot sooner than 3000 years though.

Only africans did not mix with neanderthals everyone else did

There are some denominations of Protestant Christianity (Episcopalians, Evangelicals, and Unitarians come to mind) that are so intent on white replacement, they should be outlawed. Imagine fucking up demographics, labor, and housing markets on top of what investment firms are doing and think you're serving God.

They make Satanists look good.

Protestants are the ones who want more racemixing not catholics. (Maybe both are okay with it, but protestants are more into it)
True

my bad, i can't find the figure i'm looking for so i'll assume you're right

we probably mixed with neanderthals in the near east
that said, traditional out-of-africa is bullshit
picrel shows how 80% of our evolution in the last 2 million years could have occurred in eurasia
the oase skeletons show neanderthal hybridisation in europe, but those skeletons belong to a dead lineage

Only westoid hunter gatherers. That's why modern day westoids love niggers so much and can't stop filling their cunts with them. They are RETVRNING.

They wouldn't be able to fake Otzis skin color because his skin was still there and similar to the color it was when he was alive.

Your people descend from WHGs as well.

it's probably the original article on the bell beaker invasion and he transformation of england, IIRC the name was something like that, it's just that Beakers had a lot of EEF already
here's an historical plot of EEF(Cardial) ancestry in England through time with global25 and the usual WHG/EEF/Yamnaya model

Europeans were actually black!!!

Where exactly do niggers think whites came from?

Yakub.

Our great Father Yakub that greated us as bioweapon to kill blacks

tanned tucker

thjjr.png - 964x612, 1.06M

they actually found one of his direct descendants not even a mile away from where they found the DNA and the guy is white as snow

cheddarman.png - 583x609, 470.81K