What stage of capitalism is this?

Reminder: it is enshrined in law that a companies only purpose is to make as much profit as possible for its shareholders

IMG_6412.png - 873x735, 71.81K

the jewish stage

It's cool how random ass medium posts are considered reliable sources now

posted it again!

medium article

blogs you can rely on.

lmao it's real
chris-jeffries.com/blackrock-is-suing-unitedhealth-for-giving-too-much-care-to-patients-after-the-ceo-was-murdered

The lawsuit alleges UnitedHealth “misled investors” by not being clear about how all this negative publicity might make them, you know, actually honor their insurance contracts.

cbsnews.com/news/unitedhealth-investors-lawsuit-brian-thompson-luigi-mangione/

Attorneys argued that the company's statements on performance expectations last year and earlier this year were "materially false and misleading" because UnitedHealth didn't tell shareholders "it would have to adjust its strategy, which resulted in heightened denials compared to industry competitors."

The funny thing is that it's not actually statute, it's just case law. In 1919 a state court ruled in Dodge vs Ford Motor Company that Ford must put shareholders ahead of employees and customers, and it's stuck this whole time.

Company A sues Company B for being too nice to its customers.

Ohhhhh say can you seeee!

Dodge was a jewish company in 1919 and BlackRock is a 100% jewish company. It's no surprise to the jew woke that this would happen.

And just to think, that kike just finally got home security about two years ago LMAO

AMERICANS
ARE
PUSSIES

so it's not le blackrock it's some random investor named Roberto Faller.

"Nothing to see here. You guys need to focus on the middle east" - Blackrock owned Hasan (((night media)))

Roberto Faller

this guy?

Slam dunk case. Precedent set by Dodge v Ford.

executive board changes policies so they don't get shot in the face

shareholders get mad and sue because of policy change resorting to slightly lower profits

So the executives are basically taking all the risk lmao, shareholders really are fucking leeches

Yes this is common knowledge. The "CEO is the villain" is something pushed for the shareholders benefit.

Why can you sue a company for not turning a profit? Capitalism doesn’t guarantee profit

Blackrock was behind it all
they seem to be big on assassinations and this was so they could sue UnitedHealth

blackrocker.png - 442x376, 173.84K

Didn't the health care pay out $1.6M for his back surgeries? Why was he upset at a heath care boss when he made out very well from them?

You can argue that the treatments/operations shouldn't have been $1.6M, but that isn't the fault of the insurance company.

Corporate fascism

When jews demanded an investment behave more like a loan except with infinite potential interest.

well doesn't it typically get traced back to english common law and fiduciary duty though?
dodge vs ford is usually cited when people are talking about the decisions of management vis a vis labor/employees and don't get me wrong it's a big deal and we should get it repealed ASAP, but i thought the "stakeholder responsibility" is a bigger deal and goes deeper

interestingly, some of Anon Babble's regular enemies (Klaus Schwab, Lynn Forester de Rothschild, the COP conference all stars) are some of the biggest and highest profile advocates of reforming these laws to include other interests besides corporate investors (eg "inclusive capitalism" "stakeholder capitalism" etc)

i assume it's because these high-ranking power players realize that our current babylon system based on rapacious greed will lead to an uncontrolled collapse one way or another, which would be bad for business, so they are seeking to roll out a "kinder gentler globalized capitalism" and give up, yknow, 25% or 33% of their power/control as opposed to rolling the dice on a 50% or 75% chance of losing all their power and wealth, like might happen in a chaotic collapse.

look up the material released by the Council for Inclusive Capitalism, Lynn Forester De Rothschild (Evelyn's widow)'s pet project. like their Just Energy Transition whitepaper. you can tell they are a little bit scared by how strongly they advocate for a move away from the current model. it gives the impression they know something big is coming down the pipeline.

Based. Total goyim death.

i still just dont understand why right wingers love this sort of thing. the fuck is wrong with right wingers?

Why can you sue a company for not turning a profit?

I can sue them for approving claims that they shouldnt be. they have a legal responsibility to increase shareholder value.

It's cool how all amerimutts are willing slaves for corporations and will defend anything they do online for free. Just kidding, it's actually pretty gross. Seek therapy.

I knew I would see mutts defending this. It's the only reason you're even alive, to defend your corporate masters who humiliate and abuse you on a daily basis. Obviously you like this arrangement, so the only possible explanation is that mutts are all cucks

characterizing blackrock's relationship with blackstone as "larry fink seeking funding" is such a weird mischaracterization, bordering on an outright lie.
blackrock was literally born out of blackstone, why aren't they mentioning steven schwartzman's name here? blackstone are the real estate investors and blackrock are the innovators of fianancial instruments based on mortgages and real estate (REITs, etc).
it was all set up to take advantage of the 2008 crash, and turn housing and real estate into an investment commodity.

this is a long essay, probably best read over a few sittings and digested slowly, but if you read it you will not only understand blackrock and blackstone but the entire US economy, 2008 crash and current conditions leading to the upcoming crash better than 99% of the population.
thehotstar.net/theblackstone.html

the author, simon dovey, also wrote one of the best books about epstein/pedo blackmail networks, called "eye of the chickenhawk." his whole series on the pedo blackmail/snuff film/serial murder networks (also found on that same website i linked) are some of the darkest, best reporting on this very important topic.

the only logical conclusion to come to after reading all this information and integrating it into a coherent worldview is that our world is run by evil powers and that it is the duty of every moral and aware actor to do everything possible to resist these powers by telling the truth, acting compassionately when possible, and seeking to build another system which is not governed by corruption, greed and wanton lust for power and control

it's all in the name, right? black stone, black rock...they are telling you who they are run by and what they are dedicated to. total control over the material world.

I'll defend my corporate masters and my corporate underlings to defend me.

i make lots of money this way

the modern phenomenon of CEOs as lightning rods/public frontmen is pretty interesting to witness.
it's sort of like thinking that trump or biden actually run the government. these global corporations are huge huge structures with thousands and thousands of people involved in making decisions. if anything the power actually lies in the boards of directors, boards of trustees, and then the committees of VPs actually turn their decisions into policy and procedure.

is blackrock the new permindex? IRL Parallax View? Larry Fink new version of Clay Shaw or Louis Bloomfield?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permindex
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Bloomfield

Permindex, also referred to as Permanent Industrial Exposition or Permanent Industrial Expositions, was a trade organization headquartered in Basel, Switzerland.[1][2][3] Allegations that Permindex was a front organization for the Central Intelligence Agency have been advanced by advocates of some John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories.[4]

this is one of the all-time great schizo conspiracy movies and features impeccable 70s vibes, right up there with The Conversation IMO
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Parallax_View

You aren’t any more bulletproof than ceo man

it's not that they aren't turning a profit, it's that they are making decisions and policies that aren't 100% dedicated to maximizing profit (in this case, as i understand it UNH was making decisions which benefited customers/policyholders instead of investors, which could be seen as a violation of fiduciary duty)

i am feeling very vindicated by this news story and discussion because i've been ranting for several years about how fiduciary duty/stakeholder interest is actually the philosophical cornerstone/keystone of the entire corrupt system but nobody ever seems to hear me, or understand, or care.

capitalism

That's right goyim, capitalism.

the modern phenomenon of CEOs as lightning rods/public frontmen is pretty interesting to witness.

Anon, it's because they're recognizable. They're the modern equivalent of nobility and landed gentry at this point.
You're right, though. Tons of power is split amongst boards and shit—much like the courts of lower barons and dukes. So they spend time and effort shoring up their own position. Meanwhile the peasantry just sees a bunch of fancy faggots in a castle arguing about who's in charge of their little fiefdoms

is blackrock the new permindex?

Soitseems.jpg - 1074x752, 70.82K

Because those "right-wingers" are the ones that benefit massively from it. They are the corporate shareholders, managers, lawyers, etc

This, they're the managerial class, they're managers and therefore in a position of authority over these matters and so people rightfully blame them. The shareholders being the main beneficiaries of the arrangement doesn't absolve the executive suite of guilt, claiming otherwise is just the usual cope from people who religiously defend CEOs like slaves.

Poor right wingers also defend this en masse. It's the only thing that unites all reactionary ideologies, the protection of capital.

they have a legal responsibility to increase shareholder value.

No they don't you gullible moron. They have a legal responsibility to act in the best interests of the corporation. If that does not align with the shareholders' desire to see line go up then tough shit for the shareholders.

there's an awful lot about luigi mangione's story and character which remains unexplored IMO. i am personally most interested in his family connections (super rich and well-connected to circles which are close to political power in a very spook-heavy region of the country) and employment history (is it possible he was recruited as an asset either knowingly or unknowingly?)

the whole thing just seems like a set-up, passion-play, IRL street theater in multiple ways- in a way that reminds me a lot of George Floyd, Michael Reinohl, January 6th riots, the Take Em Down protests about confederate statues, and so on.

it's almost like spooks have invented a new category of event or performance that splits the difference between fake or real, which uses social media to catalyze political events to guide the trajectory of the zeitgeist, sparking national discussions and legislation and things like nationwide protests, corporate policies...they go upstream of memes by creating "happenings" or IRL events which then become memes (think of the image of George Floyd getting his neck kneeled on by his old coworker at the Oddfellows nightclub, Derek Chavin, or the image of the Washington DC Capitol Police opening the gates and doors of the capitol building and waving the J6 protestors in, thereby ensuring Trump could be accused of disrupting the counting of election results)

The socialist stage

BlackRock is funded with money printing, aka redistribution of wealth.

tough shit for the shareholders.

Nah, that's why theyre being sued.

I dont need to be, I'm not CEO level. Nobody shoots the VP

So both right and left leaning activists who have any desire to see any change in the world need to target Blackrock along with C-suite execs.

It was already pretty obvious but at least they're making it easy for the retards to understand.

Poor right wingers also defend this en masse

Can you provide some examples of this? I can't say I've ever seen it, it sounds more like some seething lefty attempted smear agenda

it is enshrined in law

Can you cite the law? Can you cite any evidence to back up your clickbait screencap?

needful 6.jpg - 1024x1024, 212.05K

That's what happens when you lie continuously for generations, moishe.
Nobody takes ANYTHING written in a paper or in a chyron at the bottom of a tv seriously anymore.
You don't control "truth" because you lied too much and for too long.

so it's not le blackrock it's some random investor named Roberto Faller.

And it's because he claims United lied about the earnings projections. But let's not get facts get in the way of exciting hyperbole.

cast iron.jpg - 542x800, 29.62K

It's the only thing that unites all reactionary ideologies

When Britain left the EU it was all the lefties that were constantly crying about "think of the money the corporations are going to lose if we leave" so is that the kind of reactionary ideologies you are talking about?

It is literally the entire theme of this board and pretending that poor right wingers are suddenly against capitalism is not a winning argument. What you are doing right now is trying to establish a narrative that right wingers resist this sort of thing when in fact they vigorously defend it. Its happening literally in this thread. Why?

i am feeling very vindicated by this news story

That's because you're too fucking stupid to actually research the details and base your worldview off of clickbait you read over at r-antiwork.

Who cares
let OP blame Blackrock anyways its not like they deserve sympathy or protection considering how they have single-handedly destroyed the US housing market since 2008.

poor right wingers are suddenly against capitalism

kek. what a specious argument.
Have you ever listened to a SINGLE country song in your life? Half of them are about a woman and the other half are about how the bank repossessed their shit, with a small fraction about cowboys

Also if this lawsuit succeeds then it proves without a doubt that even if there was a cure for all cancers it would never be released to the public because its bad for business and its more profitable to treat cancer with poison (chemotherapy)

it was all set up to take advantage of the 2008 crash, and turn housing and real estate into an investment commodity.

to build on this, i would argue that after the Long Term Capital Management mini-crash and the dot-com boom (incidentally, both were caused by high-frequency trading and algorithmic trading), all the Wall Street insiders knew perfectly fucking well that 2008 was coming, they knew perfectly fucking well that these derivatives and subprime mortgage tranches and collateralized debt obligations were going to blow up sooner or later, you could even say that the periodic collapses are intentional outcomes which are part of the cybernetic feedback loops created by the financial engineers, which allow them to buy up even more of the economy

the case study of the LTCM crash is very under-studied and under-rated in my opinion. it was the first big test of letting algorithms dictate the trajectory of the economy (even if it was laughably small and simplistic compared to what we've got today, for example Renaissance Technologies' black box AI trading machine or, especially, Blackrock's Aladdin AI)

incidentally, a lot of people connected to LTCM are popping up today, Larry Fink being one of the more obvious ones. it's almost like these wall street insiders were using LTCM's derivatives trading algorithms as a pilot test. and then when it collapsed, it was the butterfly flapping its wings that ended up with fucking Lehman Bros and Bear Stearns going down a decade or so later.

it's all about AI running the economy. high frequency trading and algorithmic trading. the reason these .01% ghouls are obsessed with AI is because it represents the ability to manage, control and even engineer complex nonlinear systems- like the economy, like weather, like the collective consciousness (see: Cambridge Analytica) and behavior of the human race and environment. LTCM represented the first babysteps of this.

It was real in my mind!

How many single family homes does Black Rock own? What do you do for work, how much savings do you have, how is your credit rating? At what price point do you feel you'd be getting into home ownership if it weren't for this giant conspiracy?

the left

Liberals are not the left, that's just something right wingers tell themselves because their liberal rightoid brothers embarrass them. Any leftist opposing Brexit would have been doing so solely because it was a privatization scheme and associated with austerity. So, why are you, a poor right winger, defending the wallets of those who exploit you for free?

Formulaic mainstream musicslop written by millionaires and produced and promoted by the multibillion dollar corporate music industry puts on blue collar minstrelsy show without ever actually calling out the perpetrators

the poor

Lmao yeah mutt, Toby Keith is struggling isn't he? Poor guy.

enjoy your earthly wealth in this lifetime because after you pass from this material realm you will be confronted with the legions screaming souls whose suffering you benefit from.

think about that next time you're out on your boat, or grilling at your cabin! imagine a diabetic grandma who died of unmanaged COPD, suffocating slowly over months, crawling up your leg wailing while you flip that ribeye and sip your hefeweizen.

Late stage

Post a link to the lawsuit and cite which claims you believe would cause any of that to happen.

What stage of capitalism is this

the jewish stage

/thread

Reminder: it is enshrined in law that a companies only purpose is to make as much profit as possible for its shareholders

ironically this is the jewiest part of the jewish shareholder-capitalism see

that they shouldnt be

source: My ass

Kill yourself. Save the insurance company money and make your stocks worth more by killing yourself YOU HAVE A MORAL OBLIGATION TO KILL YOURSELF AND MAKE STOCK GO UP FAGGOT DO IT NOW

44% of single-family homes that were bought in 2022 - 2024 were purchased by private equity investors a trend that was kick started by Larry Fink in the early 2000s, and they themselves own an enormous portfolio of properties.

And most of these homes are "flipper" homes, which used to be called "starter homes" they are usually older, smaller, single-family units that are bought up by the neighborhood by large private equity firms and then then they begin selling those units at ever increasing prices. Because the way "zillow" works and the "value" of land works is that its all based on what your neighbors house recently sold for, they don't factor in things like average income of the zip code or cost of living of the zip code the only metric that is truly counted for housing prices is the value of the nearest home that sold recently.

It is an absurd system which has created an absurd scenario where income has barely moved in 40 years but the cost a "starter home" has increased from $40,000 to 500,000 - 750,000 depending on which state you live in.

after 2008 blackrock became "the private federal reserve" and "the fourth branch of federal government" and was more or less gifted an absolutely huge amount of distressed assets from the multi-trillion bailouts engineered by Wall Street Spook Sockpuppets Henry Paulson, Ben Bernanke, Timothy Geithner, Rob Rubin, Larry Summers, who (if hell exists) will certainly all burn in the hottest corner of hell for their crimes against humanity

next time you see an 80+ year old elder working as a door greeter at Wal Mart or taking orders at a fast food drive through, imagine Henry Paulson's cadaverous face laughing as he counts his millions, or Timothy Geithner high-fiving Larry Summers over successfully de-regulating financial markets.

66% of all bankruptcies in america come from medical debt.

Medical debt is a significant factor in American bankruptcies, with a large percentage of filings attributing medical expenses as a primary or contributing cause. Specifically, studies indicate that a substantial portion of bankruptcies, as high as 66.5%, are directly linked to medical bills. This means that medical debt is a major driver of financial distress for many Americans, leading to bankruptcy as a last resort.1

Each of these financial vampires (all of whom seem so closely tied to Goldman Sachs) should be made to eat leatherbound copies of the Glass-Steagel legislation with knife and fork. and then if they survive the indigestion, they should have to work a dead-end service job and try to support a family. or wander the land subsisting on alms, like buddhist monks.

1. ilr.cornell.edu/scheinman-institute/blog/john-august-healthcare/healthcare-insights-how-medical-debt-crushing-100-million-americans

Source: Trust me bro.

OK. Well that's all the proof I need. Carry on feeling sorry for yourself and e-crying on social media and I'm sure life will throw you a better pitch one day.

proletariat.gif - 800x780, 40.74K

wahh wahh why isnt my healthcare free

i cant wait till Trump deports you welfare sucking leeches.

Indeed, jews love nothing more than goyim dying due to denied healthcare they’ve paid for. Really gets the old paws rubbing together

no, you fucking retard, actually doing violence to the visible tip of the iceberg is exactly what the bad guys (spooks) want. because it gives them the excuse they are looking for to crack down even further and remove whatever remains of our civil rights.

when the state enjoys a monopoly on violence, then using violence is a strategic error- falling into a trap- playing a game on a board that they own, whose rules they write, where they own all the pieces

IMO any meaningful resistance NEEDS to be nonviolent- not necessarily out of ethical concerns, but strategic concerns.

if we want to win (ie, create a system that works for the 99%, not the 1%) we NEED to build a nonviolent political movement which speaks to the concerns of everyday people on all parts of the political system (eg, lack of housing, incredible levels of debt, a medical system that is run for profit, the fact that banker-psychopaths have been allowed to write all legislation and regulation through their elected sockpuppets, wealth inequality, stuff like that)

i would honestly say that targeted assassinations of visible high profile individuals is one of the worst possible things that could be done, same with infrastructure sabotage, or any of the other dumb bullshit violent tactics proffered helpfully by intelligence agency-created extremist ideologies online.

IMO mutual aid and involvement in local political issues, connecting with local communities via old-fashioned outreach (phonebanking, doorknocking, community meetings) is a much more powerful technique. "propaganda of the deed" has always been a spook provocation tactic advanced by agents provocateurs infiltrated into activist groups

atomwaffen/patriot front sympathizers would do well to read "the man who was sunday" by GK Chesterton, extremist activist groups have always been infiltrated by spooks. violence serves the owner/managerial class by turning the majority of the population against the movement.

Liberals are not the left

The left no longer exists as a political force though, at least in CA/US/UK. Time after time liberal progressives go

hey look a spooky rightwinger!

and gain whatever support they needed to govern the next 4 years entirely as they wish.

they have a legal responsibility to increase shareholder value.

Why? That’s like saying casinos have a legal responsibility to pay me out when I bust

i am not going to let facts get in the way of my internet dopamine.
my sense of righteous indignation is too strong for your flimsy "truth" or "facts"

The left no longer exists as a political force though

Not within the western neoliberal order, certainly. Everyone is a liberal.

What stage of capitalism is this?

the stage where you whine endlessly like a bitch but nevr actually shut up and fuck off to a commie shithole to starve in silence....so, all of them i think.

it is enshrined in law

What law?

hurr durr blackrock are just investment managers they don't own anything

checkmate, loser!

you are the gayest form of pedant and i hope you stub your toe or burn your tongue on hot coffee

lmao saved

thats like saying casino have a legal responsibility to make a profit. and me being a board member or shareholder of that casino can sue them if they fail to do so.

Important things to note:

They changed their model, resulting in more people getting treatment. This underscores: violence DOES work. As always.

This best practice can be implemented in several other industries, f.e. hedge funds and the like.

2+2=4 no matter what others are telling you.

He's technically right. This was established with the Dodge brothers suing Ford motors for out-competing them and incentivizing his workers with substantial benefits. We've had more than a hundred years of modern bullshit Jewish profit hoarding because of that. Why do you think people are pissing themselves over tariff trade deals? Trump is literally acting in a way that is functionally just national unionizing and everyone making a buck off foreign slave labor is having a meltdown.
<en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_v._Ford_Motor_Co.>

same with infrastructure sabotage

One thing that might work is targeting, perhaps by a strong boycott, the economic interests of your opponent's elite support.

This looks kind of like what is being done to Musk, except his interests are diversified beyond Tesla, and it's a bit weird because the campaign has been promoted by mass media instead of being a more grassroots thing. However I doubt the campaign with Musk has any hope of working because those guys don't have any political demands besides a vibe of

please die in a fire and let Hillary have her turn

Intensely opposing someone "because he's a Nazi" because "he just is" doesn't really leave a path open to redemption or self-correction.

Each of these financial vampires (all of whom seem so closely tied to Goldman Sachs)

Our new Prime Minister has a history with Goldman Sachs. Why did GS keep showing up to profit off of the public's misery?

They don't have a monopoly on violence though, any man with a rifle and scope can take out a high value target, any man with a drone can take out 10, and any man with an understanding of gathering intel before acting can take out as many as he pleases

Do you think the world would be the same if tomorrow someone like soros was shot dead? overnight things would shift to backstabbing as each involved party fearfully tries to uninvolve themselves

Look I'm not advocating violence, it's not "ethically" or "morally" right, but if the people pushing these problems were killed things would absolutely and rapidly change, violence works, and saying that it doesn't isn't really a helpful statement, because even if you don't want violence to happen, it's absolutely incorrect to say it does not work

Violence against who?
Idiots killing random npcs, civilians, kids? Of course it is the most retarded and immoral option.
But saying "they want to be killed so they can govern you harder" is the most pathetic christcuck slave mentality you can imagine.
Shooting the right 100 people out of 8 billion tomorrow would literally change history and the global world order.
That many people die on the world in every minute anyway, so not that it matters in the statistics.
This is the general rule since ancient times, the rulers are de facto a miniscule group ruling over was amount of masses since they are retarded.

I thought America was a first world country.

Ford v. Dodge court case. Jewish Dodge brothers sued Ford because he was a good capitalist who helped both his employees whilst still guaranteeing modest but not the highest possible investment returns.

suddenly

A large amount of this board is national socialist. Do you think hyper-oligarch 1% capitalism and socialism are on the same side?

You clearly don't understand Brexit or my so called "ideologies"
Can you show where I "defended the wallets of those who exploit me"?

Reminder: it is enshrined in law that a companies only purpose is to make as much profit as possible for its shareholders

That would be the state interfering with the market then. The very fact that such a law exists suggests that under free market conditions there were corporations not doing this.

The virgins of Anon Babble will believe any unsourced unlinked screenshot as long as it scared them enough to shit their pants in their mom's basement.

libertards get the rope
international capitalism and international communism are two heads of the same jewish snake

Third Way is the solution

ideologies.jpg - 3794x1480, 1.09M

You have a low IQ. Your low IQ way of thinking indicates to me that you are a migger.

IMG_9974.jpg - 226x222, 24.22K

I wasn't agreeing with it, just pointing out the absurdity. Seethe less.

Why not national capitalism? You get nothing from socialism but a less efficient economy. If you really want to provide for the white race, you will give them a free market.

Enraged kikes

Reminder: it is enshrined in law that a companies only purpose is to make as much profit as possible for its shareholders

Which country's law? Can you link to it?

In fact NatSoc economic policy is closer to what you'd consider "national capitalism" than anything the word "socialism" brings to your mind, because you've had a bad jewish education where you think that socialism means communism.

You should read the works of Gottfried Feder and then Mein Kampf and educate yourself.
There is a reason universities don't teach the National Socialist economic model, because once you learn about it, it becomes the OBVIOUS choice of how economy should be ran.

National socialist doctrine is the acknowledgement that everyone should live in peaceful ethnostates with their own people, and not live in other people's countries.
And the economic policy side of it is to structure the economy in a way that disincentivizes parasitism like rentiering, and also shuts out foreign investors keeping all the prosperity inside the nations borders, no international jew stealing the profits that your people worked for.
Money will be printed debt-free interest-free by the State Bank, instead of the current central banking system where the money is created by "loaning" it from the jews, i.e. you are on the hook to jewish private bankers for the loan and its interest even though it came from thin air.

nationalists.org/pdf/hitler/manifesto-for-abolition-enslavement-interest-on-money-gottfried-feder.pdf

There is absolutely nothing wrong or immoral about people feeling more comfortable and inspired when being surrounded by people like themselves. In fact, it’s what is best for everyone intellectually, emotionally, physically and spiritually.
When communities are homogeneous, there is an instinctive obligation to look out for one another. Society goes from zero sum adversaries to cooperative big families.

People are happier; civic engagement explodes; prosperity is more evenly distributed and enjoyed and culture flourishes.
It’s all been definitively proven by all sociological studies and the entirety of human history.

hitler40.jpg - 1280x720, 483.9K

Leftists in jail

Shabbos goy dead

Kikes seethe

How can win even more in this timeline?

merely the 1st stage

It was made into U.S. law by their doctrine of 'case law', that is the results of a precedent trial shall be used as a reference in the future. In fact, most U.S. laws are made this way, like when hardcore inter-racial pornography was declared 'speech' and thus protected by 1A when jewish pornographers and jewish attorneys made that argument in Supreme Court in Sam Roth v. United States.
Before that it was banned by obscenity laws, but the Supreme Court ruling overruled those laws.

This case in 1919, particular was that Dodge Motors and specifically its largest jewish shareholders had a problem with Henry Ford and his Ford Motor Company, because Henry Ford was an anti-semite who thought that people should be paid according to their productivity, and not the least amount possible.
So Ford pioneered the 40-hour work week, and Ford's employees were the highest paid in the entirety of U.S., allowing Ford employees to purchase a Ford car for just one month of pay and a house for a year of pay.
This greatly angered Dodge Motors shareholders because this caused Dodge employees, and in fact lot of other factory workers in US also to demand better wages and working hours, cutting to the profits of the filthy, parasitic jews.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_v._Ford_Motor_Co.

A lot of that is just not true. Nazi Germany's economy was very similar to the soviets. Companies had to apply to the state to get resources like metal, anyone that didn't run their company as the Nazis wished would have their property seized and given to someone who would, and they unionized basically everyone into the German Labour Front. Hitler may deny it but there's a good reason people say he's against private property.

Sound money is a good policy, but foreign investments are a good thing.

/thread

anyone that didn't run their company as the Nazis wished would have their property seized and given to someone who would

Right, next you're going to point at the only time this actually happened which was Hugo Junkers' company not conceding his company to manufacture warplane parts as he was a pacifist.
And even in that case he did not have his property seized, but he was cast temporarily out of command, the company was still his and would continue to be his after the war.
No Germans had their property seized.

It's funny how you anti-nazi shills seem to completely forget how "seizing" manufacturing for the war effort is completely normal procedure and everyone else did it too, all the factories in Britain were "seized" to produce towards the war effort, and rationing was implemented everywhere EVEN in U.S. which was in a much better position as the war didn't rage on its soil.

German Labour Front also worked fantastically, union for workers without the possibility of them being infiltrated by mobsters like what happened in labor unions in the U.S.

but foreign investments are a good thing.

Nope.
Nobody actually needs the foreign investors and only jewish parasites would argue that you do.
It is of absolutely no use to allow profits to be plundered to foreign nations, this is the cause for the economic woes of many nations for example the whole stagflation that is going on in Japan is because jews staged a coup there where they forced their economy to open to (((foreign investors))) in the tail-end of 80s in addition to the Plaza accords that were shoved down their throats because they were doing too well in their closed economy that barred foreign investors.
When the jews created and crashed the housing bubble there and then forced Japan to open up and allow jewish investors to buy their assets for pennies on a dollar, now half of their profits are siphoned out of the country so obviously it no longers powers the domestic economy.

You are simply a jewish parasite and a liar and you will continue shilling against the solution that is Nazism because you greatly benefit from the status quo.
If you parasites would be cast out of White countries and your money lines cut, the economy of israel would collapse overnight and who the fuck would you jewish parasites feed off of then, each other?

Single-income households haven't been a normal thing in Japan for 20 years now.

Their profits are being plundered overseas, so it doesn't benefit the Japanese economy. The "foreign investor" is nothing but a parasite.

Let me explain.

This is entirely because of the jews, the stagnation they are experiencing is because the jews stole their banks and economy in the 90s.
Libertarian shabbos goy idiots claim that the Japan's post-war economic boom is an example of the gloriousness of unfettered capitalism and opening up the economy, but that is ENTIRELY untrue.

In reality post-war Japan used a very similar economic policy to NSDAP Germany, but instead of calling it "national socialism" they called it "welfare capitalism".
They basically turned the wartime production to producing quality consumer goods, the companies were free to compete and industries to govern themselves, however the central bank (bank of japan) was in strict governmental control and they controlled the interest rates and gave loan quotas to the japanese private banks. And most importantly, the economy was closed, they kept the (((foreign investor))) out entirely.
Because of the jewish propaganda that has been going on for so long, people today are very economically illiterate and don't understand that you don't actually need the jewish banker, you don't need the (((foreign investor))) for anything.

(cont.)

You can have the state-owned central bank print the money needed for whatever, debt-free and interest-free, and you can get the foreign capital by exporting goods and services.
This model actually worked so well that japan ended up with a astronomical trade surplus in the 80s and the wages and quality of life were the highest in the world.
The international jewry however, was seething because they were denied the opportunity to leech from the japanese economy.
So they devised a plan that they first forced the plaza accords down the japanese throats and used plants in the BOJ to hike up the loan quotas to unreasonable amounts and they were forced to the private banks, so the private banks HAD TO give out loans even if no one really wanted them.

Then all that extra cash went into property, creating a massive property bubble which came crashing down in the 90s. This was all very deliberate, so the Jewish IMF could then swoop in and "rescue" the japanese economy.
They made demands such as forcing the BOJ to become (((independent))) (((private))) organization, decoupled from the government. And also they forced the selloff of the Japanese private banks to the (((foreign investors))), and opening up the Japanese economy to the (((foreign investors))).

And that is how the Japanese economy was stolen by the Jews.
That is the same blueprint the Jews have used to force such changes in many nations of the world, that is why most central banks are (((independent))) and not in control of the government.
They use Jewish organizations like (((IMF))) and the (((World Bank))) to indebt entire nations, thus placing them firmly under the Jewish bankers heel.

(cont.)

(cont.)

This is actually the real NSDAP Germany's "crime", that they tried to extricate themselves from the jewish cartel of international banking and (((independent))) central banks colluding with them.
I obviously can't fit all the facts in couple of posts, but the following documentary is excellent for anyone interested how our monetary system actually works, how the central bank and private bank relationship works, and why the control over money supply and interest rates is no longer in hands of the people, but in the hands of the international jewry.

Princes of the Yen | The Hidden Power of Central Banks

youtube.com/watch?v=p5Ac7ap_MAY

whatever is enshnined in law that private companies should do with their profits is literally the opposite of capitalism, for starters

you fucking commie retards know so little about capitalism, you could probably be tricked into supporting ancap policies if the media tried. in fact in the US the media already got commies angry about tariffs kek

btw the problem with US healthcare is in itself a consequence of not enough free market

Cronyist investor monopoly stage. The stage of capitalism without free markets and socialism for too big to fail companies.

post-war Japan used a very similar economic policy to NSDAP Germany

you don't need the (((foreign investor))) for anything.

commie opinion discarded

There's a bit more nuance to this than posted here. They are being sued because they didn't tell investors they were going to switch strategy to fewer claim denials in the wake of Brian's death.

If the board wants to get scared for their own safety, that's fine but they shouldn't lie to their investors about it.

but foreign investments are a good thing.

What kind of foreign investment, anon?

In Canada, which jumped on the foreign direct investment bandwagon quite early sadly, the vast vast majority of foreign direct investment has not been the creation of new businesses to expand the Canadian economy. It's been foreign money buying out productive Canadian enterprise to either extract the profits overseas, or sometimes to shut down the Canadian competitor. Sometimes the Canadian competitor is shut down after the buyer pinky swears to the government that they won't shut it down in order to get the purchase approved, then not too long afterwards they shut it down anyways.

Actually it's not even foreign money buying Canada out. In many cases Canada's economy is buying itself out to the benefit of the foreign entity. No hard comprehensive stats available for this sadly, but the foreign buyer can come to Canada and use the value of the purchase to get a loan from our wonderful patriotic Canadian banks. The interest is even tax deductible.

In the ultra rare case that some brand new technology and enterprise is being brought to Canada, how much public money from levels of government is being used to subsidize that? Tens of billions of dollars recently went towards battery and electrical vehicle factories in Canada, and more recently they all started going bankrupt or getting cancelled.

Of course, this is Canada, and maybe there's some other country out there that does Foreign Direct Investment right. Besides China because you know, the whole China thing of come come build your factories here and we will have a state policy to make you unnecessary as fast as we can.

What's strange is people glorifying luigi, and then after the election when stocks were dipping, there was several occassions where United was in the green while everything else was red.

And it's bigger than that. Apparently United has bought up a lot of smaller doctors offices, so then they've got a situation in some cases where they are the insurance company and the doctor, so they are negotiating prices with themselves.

To much care?

WTF is that? How can you care to much for some one? Like what do they get the good penicillin instead of sugar pills?

Do they actually pay for the doctors now?

Gee, maybe capitalism isn't so great after all? Who could have guessed?

It seems that there is some work to be done for the Inquisition, again

so then they've got a situation in some cases where they are the insurance company and the doctor, so they are negotiating prices with themselves.

Isn't the reason for Nixon shackling America with its health insurance model because of doctors offices starting to act a bit like insurers and this was supposedly terribly terribly unethical?

China is indeed a funny one, the only major power not captured by jews.
They do a lot of foreign investment overseas because the international capitalism allows it, but simultaneously they heavily limit and regulate the amount of foreign investment to China.
No israeli jew will be buying up Chinese land to rent it back to the Chinese, or buying the rights to their natural resources only to sell the resources back to Chinese, thats for sure.
Its fucking INSANE that some jew can have a piece of paper that says that this kike now owns the land in YOUR White country and you must now pay rent for it to the jew, who might not even reside in the country. Total and utter insanity.

That is why we need Nazi Blood & Soil laws, they are simply common sense.

In a nutshell what we should do
1) laws that ONLY native Whites can own land & propty
2) laws that ONLY native Whites can go into parliament, government jobs, or any positions of power
3) laws that ultimately will close the doors from nonwhite foreigners and strip the citizenships from nonwhite people that have gotten them

And if you think 3 isn't possible, thats just the jew talking to your ear. In 1923 America, before jews removed the White-only immigration laws, there even was a Supreme Court case (United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind), where a jeet had slithered into USA and then tried to "we wuz Aryan" so he would not be deported. The Supreme Court laughed the jeet out of the country, and they ruled that not only must that jeet be deported immediately but that if there are any jeets in USA that have been accidentally given citizenship, their citizenships must be revoked and them deported immediately too.

jewlands.jpg - 729x658, 87.7K

And yes I know the CCP was originally founded by jewish support, and Mao's inner circle was jewish and all the CCP's non-Chinese members were jews.
And it was of course jews that suggested CCP to kill millions of their smartest people to make sure no one revolts, just like in USSR.

The whole point of that cull from jewish perspective is to make the host population dumber by killing all their smart ones, so the cattle become easier for jews to rule over.
The thing is though, Mao never really let the jews rule like in USSR.

And when Mao died, all the other chinks had seen how the jews tried to take the country over.
So they didnt make any scene and execute them, but rather silently phased them out of power.

This angered the USSR where jews were still in power, because now China was a piece that jews didn't control.
The Chinese wouldn't agree to reinstalling any jews, hence the Sino-Soviet split happened.

Since then Chinks have been very wary of the perfidiousness of the jews and have made sure they're kept away from power.
It also helps that it was White genes the jews stole, not Chinese, so its not as easy for ethnic jews slither into Chinese societies as it to ours.

And then starting in the 1980s the chinks started to phase out communism altogether seeing it as ultimately failed system.
Today, they are communist only in name.
Current system closer to national socialism or state capitalism.

The insanity of the American healthcare system happened simply because jewish parasites were allowed to infiltrate the White country.

The whole system needs to be brought down its fucking insane that you actually spend MORE on healthcare as taxes as Europeans do, yet you get nothing in return because that tax is only to pay for niggers, shitskins and poor elderly.
Meanwhile the typical White American wont get anything out of it, and has to pay AGAIN in private health insurance, not only paying more in tax but paying it twice, which is insane.

All of this is because the same reason as always - jews. They slithered into the system and made these very complex financial arrangements where you buy insurance and then there is insurace agent involved in negotiating price with a HMO (health management organization) which is a jewish middle man between the hospital that actually provides the service and the insurance company that pays for it.

When you think about it its fucking ridiculous, there is the customer - the patient, then there is the doctor - the provided. Meanwhile there are at very minimum 5 jewish middlemen in-between.

customer(patient)

insurance company of the patient (useless eater jew)

health management organization (useless eater jew)

insurance company of the hospital (useless eater jew)

legal services of the hospital (useless eater jew)

private for-profit hospital administration and profit-seeking (useless eater jew)

provider(doctor)

and because how all the jewish middlemen make money hand over fist for providing nothing of value, and the doctors are paid decently to shut them up about it, there is no incentive for anyone in the system to bring the costs down so they just keep ballooning and the customer gets absolutely fucked

you should either go to full socialized healthcare removing the middlemen or none socialized healthcare banning all the middlemen and paying the doctor directly

violence only works to promote lasting change if the underlying incentive structure is flimsy. If you kill someone like Soros, then you will just get another one pretty much immediately. It's not like there's a shortage of leeches on wall street.

Remember, if you don't support Black Rock owning Ukraine, you're evil!

plebbit.jpg - 524x604, 28.25K

the part where OP is a faggot and doesn't post the link

I think a genetically engineered virus that would attack jewish DNA and then unleashing it in the world would do wonders

It would let us rid of the worst pushers of multiculturalism and the saboteurs that prevent us from taking our ethnostates back.
It's obvious that everyone is more civic-minded, work as team, and less scammers around when everyone around is White and there is ethnic unity.
Basically turning countries into big families like Nordic countries used to be before the jewish mass immigration

aristotle3.png - 720x939, 807.41K

noooo you slave to jews

Your MAID appointment is next week sweetie.

Are americans not allowed to have good education?
United is being sued for misrepresenting their dividend goals, they inflated their value without openly stating that it relies on overdenying claims.
Fuck, you people are dumb.

you should either go to full socialized healthcare removing the middlemen or none socialized healthcare banning all the middlemen and paying the doctor directly

The Canadian government decided to be compassionate progressives and expand Canadian Public Healthcare aka socialized medicine into dental, so they drew up a big fat contract and handed it to one of Canada's two mega insurance companies. :/

It's cool how all amerimutts are willing slaves for corporations and will defend anything they do online for free.

It's cool how all Canadian progressives are willing slaves for Canada's largest corporations and will defend anything they do online for free so long as it was propagandized in the right way.

w-w-we hate loblaws!!1

r/ loblaws is out of control !

peepee's staffers is a loblaws

okay you love public healthcare too right so you certainly are against loblaws' Maple moving in to execute an indirect attack on our public healthcare model right?

...fuck off and take your meds!

There is still a little bit of a more traditional left wing in Canada that can think before receiving professionally made propaganda and remains opposed to policies like foreign direct investment, but it's really rare. Sharing the American internet means getting pummelled by America's psyops on Tik Tok, YouTube, etc, to the point where our own politicians sometimes campaign on solving American problems that don't actually exist in Canada.

socialized medicine into dental, so they drew up a big fat contract and handed it to one of Canada's two mega insurance companies.

Yeah this is the American model, which is exactly how you are NOT supposed to do socialized healthcare.
Use taxpayer funds to directly fill jewish middlemen pockets

It's atrocious and stuff like this will never stop until all the jews are dead and their shabbos helpers are hanged for treason

Is there no limit to how retarded and gullible and submissive you virgin chuds can be?

You are a poopoo pajeet that will never be White, and your continued trespassing of White sacred lands will no longer be tolerated

You are a russian draft dodger. You are not white. Go back to your homeland and sacrifice yourself on the frontlines for Monke's fifth superyacht.

This kiked shit hole needs to collapse already

Source: A twitter post.

.... and then one day, for no reason whatsoever, the Jews decided you were all just livestock.

twitter 21.png - 564x391, 102.83K

Kill yourself coward

Oh look, it’s this thread again

IMG_4237.png - 647x778, 15.75K

I'm starting to think that the problem isn't capitalism, but rather all these public trade companies, shareholders, Wall Street, and everything else that is killing everything.

Migger

You can just say Jews

national """"""""""""socialism"""""""""""""

Into the trash it goes. There is no socialism in national socialism, it's plain fascism, it's state mandated class collaborationism, it's zero bargaining power for workers, it's your entire society being dictated by capitalists who have the authority granted by the state to compel you to toil at gunpoint, and anyone who opposes it is enslaved or killed. Fascism is what capitalists turn to when socialists start to threaten their way of life, that's all it has ever been, and you promote it despite knowing this, because you are the enemy. Fuck off with your thought terminating cliche and your attempts to manipulate people by appealing to ideals or aesthetics, you will not be getting another 1000 [12] year reich.

mutt absolutely enraged at the truth and impotently lashing out

many such cases, as your "god emperor" once said.

They tried to screw my wife out of paying for a 20,000$ surgery they said they would pay for. We had to fight it for months just to get our insurance to pay what they said was fully covered. This is probably the type of stuff they are talking about. Pure evil.

You did not make a single argument, you just attacked me for criticizing capitalism. You are the slave.

Capitalism ≠ corporatism

Nuke Basel!

larry fink

yeah corporatism is better enjoy being a free market plumber

not real capitalism!!!!!11

lmao

Alright if you want a point of argument (you didn't bother making one either in that post btw) then how about this one:

This, they're the managerial class,

Capitalism is not a necessary precondition to the managerial class. It's more that the available technologies enable it to grow and prosper, actual capitalism or no. Did the Soviet Union ever get run by actual proletariat? How long did it take for the nomenklatura to accrue power? Who were the "ones who pretend to pay us" in the end if it was the proletariat who pretended to work?

Capitalism is not a necessary precondition to the managerial class

I didn't say it was. Your reading comprehension is terrible, as is the case with virtually all reactionaries.

money printing, aka redistribution of wealth

Wrong
and (You)—along with 97% of Anon Babble and everyone on Earth—don't understand what "money printing" even is.
Debt note fiat currency issuance is the power of central banks, exerted over everything and everyone on this planet.
Goal of central banks: to own everything, by being the lenders and buyers of last resort.
Every time a government passes a spending bill, it's a boon for central banks because new currency with handshake of that sovereign nation's treasury is created out of thin air.
This is not 'redistribution' of wealth but OWNERSHIP of (You)r assets and labor aka All (You)r Wealth, by central banks.
Central banks *own* (You), as their slave

97% Owned — How is money created
youtube.com/watch?v=XcGh1Dex4Yo

Be both a Medicare-funded insurer and healthcare provider

This is the UPMC model

Based Luigi, seems that he obtained what he wanted. What a hero!
Suck this Italian dick, filthy CEO-defender Kikes!

No, the source is the Washington Times, retard. That's a link to a Wash Times article.
Cope and seethe.

>Capitalism is not a necessary precondition to the managerial class

I didn't say it was.

I'm glad we agree. This means there's some hope to create solutions beyond sloppily blaming capitalism.

USA copies European healthcare

nooo that's capitalism

remind me how many Brits are waiting for healthcare or denied healthcare every year?
last time i checked it was 7 million, think it's over 15 now.