Why did white people chimp out about protestantism? It just seems like non-white cultist fanatical behaviour...

Why did white people chimp out about protestantism? It just seems like non-white cultist fanatical behaviour. Was it all part of the evolution of civilizing the White Man? Why do we see those same traits today? Football/Hockey Hooliganism.

I also recognize there is a class thing here - the elites used the proletariat to act out their political agenda - as has always been, and always will be.

10937.jpg - 600x645, 73.57K

Because it's a materialist religion. Protestants are the reason trannies, faggots and women can become pastors.

no white people chimped out about protestantism.

you mean, why are brown papists still chimping out about protestantism in this 21st century

It's weird how rome still cannot get over the reformation, thus they flood protestant nations with darkies

Catholicism was the only thing uniting us

like during the 100 year war?

Literally a family feud

just 2-3 million deaths

Protestantism allowed common people to read and think for themselves, which is a distinctly white trait.
Catholicism demands unquestioning obedience to an old pedo in Rome. That is what resembles a cult.

Marty was a Rosicrucian, the glowniggers of the day, and he acted to abet the schism of the husk worm by old rome to perpetuate it's final destination, as all the unknowing and knowing golems of dialectic abetting the great work do so well.

Us? Are the walls talking again?

It was the polarity all abrahamic religions require.

Protestantism allowed common people to read and think for themselves

The latin vulgate was translated by St Jerome for the purpose of making the bible more accessible over 1,000 years before your marty threw his toys out of the cot.

Anyone who believes that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, the Messiah who died for their sins and was then brought back to life, is a Christian.
Protestantism exists because Catholics forgot this truth and began murdering their brothers and sisters, the blood of Protestant martyrs undermined the Roman Church just as it undermined Pagan Rome before them.
Christians are not justified by adherence to the doctrine of a denomination, but by their adherence to the Lord.

As Scripture says, “Anyone who believes in him will never be put to shame.”

making the bible more accessible

If Jerome succeeded in this it was no longer true during the build up to the Reformation, and this is well documented. Or do you believe this whole argument has persisted for five hundred years for no reason?

There's some broader going people aren't seeing.

The Catholic Church during the medieval period was incredibly corrupt and full of simony, power games (with the Holy Roman Emperor, the King of France, Naples, Spain, England, between cardinals, whatever). Those corruptions caused the Church to spread heretical ideas that had nothing to do with God's Will, but rather just money or power, using "the Church is infallible!" as a cover.

Jan Hus protested the church, the church promised to give him free passage to talk about it, then said ''sike!'' and murdered him. Luther and Calvin weren't right about everything - thinking predestination is factual is heresy - but they had a lot right.

The Church wouldn't turn around and fix their issues until Vatican I and II councils. (Allow local language in the reading of scripture or prayers, shorten mass to make it easier for people, have the priest turn to the audience to serve the people rather than be distant). The Protestants too have turned around in the right direction in a lot of cases; predestination, in the Calvinist churches, is rarely seen than more than the theory they forgot about. And the political powers that drove Catholic church policy have been eroded over the last decades; for the faults of the Pope John Paul, what he did correctly is spread out cardinals over many nations, eroding local politics from interfering heavily in Church business.

However, this isn't without flaws; Vatican II didn't address concerns about liberalism properly, but *all* churches are now battered from without and within by liberal heresy and agnostic attacks. That doesn't mean the Sedevacantists or the SPXX club are correct or that old mass should return.

The Orthodox, meanwhile, have lost the overpowering presence of Moscow after the war of Ukraine (or SMO whatever you want to call it) started, with Kirill losing the plot entirely. This causes the Greeks, Serbs and others to be able to talk to Rome.

(cont)

I work to live, instead of living to work, that simple

Whites are born cattle golem

Anything that requires them to develop a soul and think for themselves is abhorrent

They'd rather have some grifter telling them what to think rather than understand what the fucking religion they subscribe to actually says lmao

Also Abrahamic religions are Jewish psyops

catholics dont like him because they got soft after a thousand years and let kikes sneak their way into their order. which was essentially a room full of jews larping as christians while trying to outjew one another.

This is what I *suspect* is going on - take it with a grain of salt; The Holy Spirit is guiding all Churches that remained loyal to Christ and doctrine (Romans 1:18-32) to re-unite; Ecumenism. However, not in a way any Christian will like.

Soon, liberalism will break just like how fascism, communism, Napoleon or other crises for the church broke. All Churches that remained loyal to the Spirit and didn't give in to the rainbow cult or worldly powers are ''eligible'', so to speak. Anglicans are done for; they're led by literal Marxist atheists (''modernists'') who want fancy jobs. They're dying. The American Presbyterians are filled with Republican/Democrat party politics or rainbow cult-like behavior. German Lutherans or Scandinavian churches largely capitulated. The Catholic church is hammered by liberalism or by love-less, hateful, spiteful Sedevacantists. The Russian-Orthodox churches are done for too, with Kirill placing the Russian State higher than the Kingdom of God.

Others, like the Serbian or Greek Orthodox, the Coptics in Egypt, the Dutch Calvinists (foremostly HHK, GG, CGK), the remains of the Lutherans, Moravians and so on, have the Spirit.

Where does this take us?

What does the 3rd Secret of Fatima, a well-known Catcholic prophecy, say? That an angel shouts ''Penance! Penance! Penance!''. I suspect this indicates the Church, despite bruised and beaten by worldly powers (as the blood of the martyrs is collected) *must* penance for its sins. The Catholic Church *must* apologize to the other churches for its sins and ask for forgiveness. Vice versa too - the Iconoclastic Fury for example. All lies between the denominations *must* cease so the Spirit can act.

Then what will the Spirit do? Show everyone where they erred - now possible because "eye beams have been removed". What the truth is of these errors, I cannot say (Nature of the Trinity? Sola Scriptura vs. Tradition? Papal infallibility?)

Protestant churches are extremely anti faggot and treat women like cattle, my protestant relatives openly preach to women how they should stfu and listen to men. It was really awkard watching it.

There wasn't a proletariat during the reformation. There was a peasantry. Protestantism was generally a phenomenon of the urban middle class and some nobility. If a city was an Imperial Free City or in a principality far from Vienna, it tended toward protestantism. Rural villages didn't really participate, with the exception of the South West which Muentzer led in the Peasant War.

The Gutenberg Bible predates the Protestant Reformation and never had an official Catholic decree against it.

Jesus said "Forgive them for they know not what they do."
But if they hadn't killed him his whole ressirection thing would wouldn't have occured.
So that makes his statement incoherent

Chimp out? WTF are you MOSSAD or something?
Martin Luther nailed the 95 these to the door of the Catholic Cathedral and started a revolution.
He said the Bible is the word of God and a pope can't tell people to buy "indulgences" which will prevent them from suffering in Purgatory if they die. Even Catholics today admit that what that Pope did was straight up unholy.
So the Protestants split and the Catholics learned the hard way not to mess with them. Or Germans and Northerners would be sacking Rome in a replay of 400 AD. Now it was 1517.
Unfortunately the Jews began infiltrating The German, Swiss, Austro area.
This is where Luther made his observations regarding their cunning, their obvious agenda, and he found out they believed Christ was being boiled alive in excrement and was a common criminal being punished by Moloch in Hell. He didn't like that.
Or that Goyim were supposed to serve the Jews and could be treated as cattle, especially if they disobeyed. Also it was OK and even encouraged to cheat them in business.
He was not happy when his spies learned this.

Protestants are absolutely more puritan than catholics. They don't try to trick god, catholics are more like jews in this respect.
Catholics are just atheists, except that they ask a priest for forgiveness once a week. You can see it in the way they behave.

What's next for the Southern Baptist Convention? It's the biggest Protestant denomination in the United States and has also remained completely conservative on social issues.

Once a week? Only at my death bed

This is where Luther made his observations regarding their cunning, their obvious agenda, and he found out they believed Christ was being boiled alive in excrement and was a common criminal being punished by Moloch in Hell. He didn't like that.

I like that though. That's just believing the most offensive thing you can come up with just to piss these people off.

The Schism caused by the reforms are what let the Jews infiltrate the entire religion for good.

Why do you think?

However, this ''course correction'' is going to upset *a lot of* people. Those who entrench themselves, like the Catholic Sedes or the Orthodox clergy, might just break apart because of this. But if it truly is the will of the Spirit, the Spirit will brush them aside.

It also falls in line with something else; the Arian heresy disappeared mostly after the Church wrote down Nicaea properly. Nestorian heresy disappeared mostly as well after the Chalcedon council. But the Great Schism is still festering after a thousand years, or the Protestant Reformation after 500 years. Why?

Because they had a point. Political powers had corrupted the Church, clouding God's Will. Things that only very recently - the last 60 years - have been rectified, although they over-corrected here and there. And this was done, I believe not out of liberalism or ''making the Church more with the times'', but because some Cardinals saw the writing on the wall.

But they will not be able to do it alone; they will need to apologize to their Protestant and Orthodox brethren, and they in turn. They will need their Orthodox brethren for for sacramental tradition and liturgical depth. They will need their Protestant brethren for biblical fidelity, moral rigor, and prophetic witness against secular corruption - and the Dutch Calvinists are hardcore at that. And they will need the Coptic and the Eastern Churches for their spiritual depth, ancient witness and courage in martyrdom. (They handled kebabs for 1500 years after all).

If what I'm saying is true, the election of Pope Leo XIV is critical. So maybe he truly is ''the last pope'' - but the last of the old Catholic Church before ecumenism.

I do not know them so I can't talk about them. But if, and only if, they're not playing a "muh Republican!" or "muh Democrat!" game and refuse anything that violates Romans 1:18-32, and instead focus on the Kingdom of God and His Will, they would definitely be ''eligible''.

I was being generous. I am really thinking about nick fuentes and nick rochefort. Both are catholics, but also act incredibly degenerate all the time. Rochefort's favorite bit is showing obese porn ans BBCs to his friends.

hey mom, you wanted to see this gardening stuff

i have it on my phone

kys kike

The Roman Catholic world is the non-White world, the "Latin world".

Protestants are very White nations, north-western Europe, America, Canada, Australia. It's also just Bible. The Protestant Reformation was simply the open Bible for the common man, so that we could see the abominations and sins and blasphemies and heresies of that harlot church of Rome.

Africa

Negroes take everything that the White man gives them. Leave them alone and they will immediately go back to their voodoo religions and jungle law.

nKxf8S2.png - 1280x1258, 438.85K

The Protestant Reformation was simply the open Bible for the common man

I am a little worried about this part. The common man is going to either misinterpret the bible or take it too far. Doing everything the bible tells you to will make you end up either homeless or in prison.

give away everything you have

beat your kids as much as you want, just don't kill them

thats bullshit
the Renaissance is from Italy for example

Because he actually read the bible and found Catholics didn’t even bother to read their fucking source material.

Democracy is nice tho

Anon, this is why Biblical study (structured too) is important. Scripture *and* tradition. This is why the catechism (which all denomination abide by) is important. How else can be apply Ephesians 6? And of course proper definitions of things so we don't fall into Arian, Nestorian, Docetism, Gnosticism or other heresies. And a good smack banner for those that preach heresies.

However, the Catholic Church sure loves to use the ban hammer on anyone that they think preaches a heresy rather than seeing a potential problem that requires rectification....

Overall i like protestants more than catholics, but the problem of the common man reading that shit and acting on it is there.

Shut the fuck up Rajesh only niggers "chimp out".

That would be too harsh to americans. All of you chimp out, but not all of you are niggers. You're wrong.

Last post; *why* am I so suspicious this is going on? Because ecumenical dialog has cleared up the air tremendously. Turns out Nestorius kind of realized Mary is the mother of God, not just Christ, since Christ's Godly and human nature are inseparable. A good part of the Assyrian Church of the East and the Ancient Church of the East are now like ''uh... I think we should rectify this...''

Another thing I'm seeing in my home country is the ecumenical dialog in recent decades between the Catholics and the Protestants. In 2016, the Pope received a delegation at the Vatican from the Calvinists which went over smoothly, and their talks (albeit slowly) are slowly gaining traction. The fact the rainbow cult exists helps to smooth things over. So old lies like "well, you're praying to the dead!" is not something I really hear anymore. I personally believe it will be the Dutch Calvinists above all who will have a critical role to play. Unless you browse Anon Babbleder, you have no idea how based these people are, being slandered for decades on end and refusing to give in to even the smallest of concessions, not even allowing female politicians. And the Vatican has taken notice of this, realizing the Spirit is with them. (Even though the biggest flaw the Dutch Calvinist have is that they're afraid of God...)

So, the future appears very hopeful.

Non-denominationalism is bad. You can't be alone, you need to be part of the communion of saints. That teaches you, guides you, corrects you. And alone you can do far less for His Kingdom than using organized resources. Simple as.

us = jews and goyim?

The Gutenberg Bible was still in Latin. People didn't appreciate the significance of Gutenberg immediately. At first it was as though Gutenberg had just made a bunch of scribes obsolete. Where the rubber hit the road was that your typical scholar (Erasmus, Luther, etc.) could access texts easily. And since a lot of people were now reading the same things they could argue about them. Before the printing press it wasn't unusual for someone to travel to various countries to read what he wanted to learn. So there were very few experts on any particular old text, and they discussed the text locally rather than sending letters to each other all over Western Europe

You could say Gutenberg and Dordrecht were councils just like the Council of Trent was.

Online Tradbros shit on Luther, but fail to recognize how off the rails the church was. It's funny because Luther wasn't the first to call bullshit. Girolamo Savonarola got himself executed when Luther was still a boy because he took over Florence and turned it into a theocratic republic

Yeah, or that before Gutenberg's press eventually reproduced enough texts that the church entered a state of permanent council because discussion became ongoing

Because catholics understood that christianity only works when people aren't allowed to read the bible.

Luther translated the bible into german
and it was so significant he basically created the modern german language

Luther taught Agricola who brought written finnish to Finland

materialist

Looks at simplicity of most prot churches

Abrahamic

good morning saar

this

There was also Jan Hus in Bohemia, who just got straight up murdered by the Catholic Church even though they promised him safety when they invited him over to talk.

For the same reason people here chimp out about cultural marxism, you clearly don't know what you are talking about and can't see the effects of the protestant cycle (the actual one).

file.png - 625x961, 1.22M

Yeah. But I like Savonarola as an example because the Latin Mass and SSPX that crap on Luther now would almost certainly consider Savonarola as /theirguy/ and ended up on the end of a rope. Luther wasn't the first to point out problems, he was the first to survive the reaction